Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Download Real Estate Finance And Investments 14th Edition Brueggeman Solutions Manual all chapters
Download Real Estate Finance And Investments 14th Edition Brueggeman Solutions Manual all chapters
https://testbankfan.com/product/real-estate-finance-and-
investments-14th-edition-brueggeman-test-bank/
https://testbankfan.com/product/real-estate-finance-and-
investments-16th-edition-brueggeman-solutions-manual/
https://testbankfan.com/product/real-estate-finance-and-
investments-15th-edition-brueggeman-solutions-manual/
https://testbankfan.com/product/real-estate-finance-and-
investments-13th-edition-brueggeman-test-bank/
Real Estate Finance and Investments 16th Edition
Brueggeman Test Bank
https://testbankfan.com/product/real-estate-finance-and-
investments-16th-edition-brueggeman-test-bank/
https://testbankfan.com/product/real-estate-finance-and-
investments-15th-edition-brueggeman-test-bank/
https://testbankfan.com/product/real-estate-finance-9th-edition-
wiedemer-test-bank/
https://testbankfan.com/product/real-estate-law-11th-edition-
jennings-solutions-manual/
https://testbankfan.com/product/introduction-to-finance-markets-
investments-and-financial-management-14th-edition-melicher-
solutions-manual/
Chapter 07 - Single Family Housing: Pricing, Investment, and Tax Considerations
Question 7-1
Why is the income approach to value often difficult to use on a single family residential appraisal?
Typically, the income approach is difficult to use because the sale of single family, rental properties are rare in the
area.
Question 7-2
What are the differences between the cost and sales comparison approaches to appraising property?
When using the market approach, the appraiser estimates the value of a property by comparing the selling prices of
properties similar to, and near, the property being appraised. Because no two properties are exactly alike, the values
of similar properties are adjusted by the appraiser for dissimilarities. When using the cost approach, the appraiser
establishes a value for the site on which the improvement is located, then determines the cost of reproducing the
improvements and adds the two. After the costs of the improvement and land value are added, the appraiser deducts
an amount for any depreciation that improvements have suffered since they were constructed.
Question 7-3
What are the capital gains rules as applied to residential property owners?
For sales of personal residence a homeowner may exclude from income $250,000 of gain, and a married couple may
exclude up to $500,000 of gain realized on the sale.
(1) Individual must have owned and used the home as a principal residence for at least two of the five years prior to
the sale (the two years do not have to be consecutive).
(2) Exclusion applies to only one sale every two years.
Question 7-4
List four important drivers of housing demand and price appreciation.
Population growth, income, households, price of rental housing
Question 7-5
What are public goods? How may they be reflected in house prices?
Public goods include education, police, fire, health and other services provided by the local public sector. To the
extent the quality/value of these services provided to homeowners exceed the cost (taxes, fees), paid, a net benefit is
thought to exist. This net benefit is generally reflected in land/property prices.
Question 7-6
When considering an investment in “distressed” properties, what are the most important areas of research that
should be considered?
(1) Market research to determine an expected future price when the investor plans to sell.
(2) Title search to determine any defects in the title and/or liens as well as the cost to clear the title.
7-1
Chapter 07 - Single Family Housing: Pricing, Investment, and Tax Considerations
Property Data
0 1 2 3 4 5
Property value $200,000 206,000 212,180 218,545 225,102 231,855
Rents 24,000 24,720 25,462 26,225 27,012
BTCF (owner)
Year 1 2 3 4 5
7-2
Chapter 07 - Single Family Housing: Pricing, Investment, and Tax Considerations
(C) The initial rent would have to be $12,356 to get an after tax IRR of 4.5% in year 4 as shown in the following exhibit.
Goal seek was used to find this answer in Excel. Trial and error cold also be used.
7-3
Chapter 07 - Single Family Housing: Pricing, Investment, and Tax Considerations
Chapter 7
Rent versus Own Analysis of a Personal Residence
Property Data
0 1 2 3 4 5
Property value $200,000 206,000 212,180 218,545 225,102 231,855
Rents 12,356 12,727 13,108 13,502 13,907
BTCF (owner)
Year 1 2 3 4 5
7-4
Chapter 07 - Single Family Housing: Pricing, Investment, and Tax Considerations
Problem 7-2
(a) Equity Investment = $60,000, House Value = $300,000 Less Mortgage $240,000
4% ÷ (1-.80) = 4% ÷ .20 = 20%
Appr. House
(b) Year Rate Price Equity Calculation EAHE
0 0 300,000 60,000 - -
1 0 300,000 60,000 - 0%
2 2 306,000 66,000 6,000 ÷ 60,000 10.0%
3 3 315,180 75,180 9,180 ÷ 66,000 13.9%
Compounded:
(1.0 *1.10*1.139) = 1.2529
Calculation:
n = 3, PV = -1, PMT = 0, FV = 1.2529 solve i = 7.8%
(Note the greater divergence between the arithmetic and geometric mean due to the irregular rates of appreciation).
Problem 7-3
(a)
Property #1 Property #2 Property #3
Address 123 Clay St. 301 Cherry St. 119 Avenue X
Sale Price $85,000 $79,000 $75,000
Less: Adjustment
Time of Sale 1,500
Location (1,000)
Site 1,200
Design (1,000)
Construction Qlty. 1,500
Number of Bedrooms (1,200) 2,000
Baths
Garage 800 800
Comparable #2 had the fewest adjustments ($2,000) and, thus, its value of $81,000 was given the most consideration when
determining the value of the property. Comparable #1 required the next fewest adjustments ($3,200), but this property is
larger than the subject property and contains more amenities such as better design and a corner lot. As a result, this property
was given less consideration in the determination of value than was comparable #2. Comparable #3 was given the least
consideration in determining the value of the subject property. This was due to the rather large number and size of
adjustments which this property required in the appraisal process. The $5,800 in adjustments which had been made on this
property indicates that it is least similar to the subject property. The estimated value of the property using the market
approach to value is $81,000.
7-5
Chapter 07 - Single Family Housing: Pricing, Investment, and Tax Considerations
(2) Cash out flows are assumed to occur monthly and will average $2,991.
4) Adding the FV of $88,156 to the loan balance of $160,000 and $8,000 in selling expenses results in $256,156 as the
desired selling price @ EOY1 in order to achieve a 20% return.
(5) The other issues that he must consider for doing this analysis are the time when the expenses occurred and the amount of
expenses at those times. If more expenses are greater earlier rather than later in the year then the required selling price to get
20% return will be higher.
(b)
(1) Equity = $40,000
Solving the cash flow to get an IRR value of 20%, we get the selling price at the end of year 2 as follows:
PVo = -$40,000
Yr1 PMTs = -$2,991
Yr2 PMTs = +$133
i = 20%
FV = $93,451
Adding FV of $93,451 to the mortgage balance of $160,000 and $8,000 in selling expenses produces a sale price of $261,450
at end of year 2.
Problem 7-5
Cash flows are summarized as follows:
(a) PV = $200,000 Price
-$180,000 Loan
+$10,500 Acquisition fees
$30,500 Equity
7-6
Chapter 07 - Single Family Housing: Pricing, Investment, and Tax Considerations
PV = -$30,500
PMTs = -$3,200
i = 20%
n = 12
Solve for FV = (X-$183,000)
FV = $262,314
It appears that this is not a good investment if the expected sale price is $225,000. The investor would have to achieve a
$262,314 sale price in order to earn the desired 20% return.
Problem 7-6
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Morphology in Linnæus.
I HAVE stated that Linnæus had some views on this subject. Dr.
Hooker conceives these views to be more complete and correct
than is generally allowed, though unhappily clothed in metaphorical
language and mixed with speculative matter. By his permission I
insert some remarks which I have received from him.
“The (to me) obscure and critical part of the Prolepsis was that
relating to the change of the style of Carduus into two leaves. Mr.
Brown has explained this. He says it was a puzzle to him, till he went
to Upsala and consulted Fries and Wahlenberg, who informed him
that such monstrous Cardui grew in the neighborhood, and procured
him some. Considering how minute and masked the organs of
Compositæ are, it shows no little skill in Linnæus, and a very clear
view of the whole matter, to have traced the metamorphosis of all
their floral organs into leaves, except their stamens, of which he
says, ‘Sexti anni folia e staminibus me non in compositis vidisse
fateor, sed illorum loco folia pistillacea, quæ in compositis aut plenis
sunt frequentissima.’ I must say that nothing could well be clearer to
my mind than the full and accurate appreciation which Linnæus
shows of the whole series of phenomena, and their rationale. He
over and over again asserts that these organs are leaves, every one
of them,—I do not understand him to say that the prolepsis is an
accidental change of leaves into bracts, of bracts into calyx, and so
forth. Even were the language more obscure, much might be inferred
from the wide range and accuracy of the observations he details so
scientifically. It is inconceivable that a man should have traced the
sequence of the phenomena under so many varied aspects, and
shown such skill, knowledge, ingenuity, and accuracy in his methods
of observing and describing, and yet missed the rationale of the
whole. Eliminate the speculative parts and there is not a single error
of observation or judgment; whilst his history of the developement of
buds, leaves, and floral organs, and of various other obscure matters
of equal interest and importance, are of a very high order of merit,
are, in fact, for the time profound.
“There is nothing in all this that detracts from the merit of Goethe’s
638 re-discovery. With Goethe it was, I think, a deductive process,—
with Linnæus an inductive. Analyse Linnæus’s observations and
method, and I think it will prove a good example of inductive
reasoning.
“P. 474. Linnæus pointed out that the pappus was calyx: ‘Et
pappum gigni ex quarti anni foliis, in jam nominatis Carduis.’—Prol.
Plant. 338.” (J. D. H.)
CHAPTER VII.
Animal Morphology.
Final Causes
It has been mentioned in the History that in the discussions which
took place concerning the Unity of Plan of animal structure, this
principle was in some measure put in opposition to the principle of
Final Causes: Morphology was opposed to Teleology. It is natural to
ask whether the recent study of Morphology has affected this
antithesis.
Mr. Owen, who has done so much for the former of these portions
of our knowledge, has also been constantly at the same time
contributing to the other. While he has been aiding our advances
towards the Unity of Nature, he has been ever alive to the perception
of an Intelligence which pervades Nature. While his morphological
doctrines have moved the point of view from which he sees Design,
they have never obscured his view of it, but, on the contrary, have
led him to present it to his readers in new and striking aspects. Thus
he has pointed out the final purposes in the different centres of
ossification of the long bones of the limbs of mammals, and shown
how and why they differ in this respect from reptiles (Archetype, p.
104). And in this way he has been able to point out the insufficiency
of the rule laid down both by Geoffroy St. Hilaire and Cuvier, for
ascertaining the true number of bones in each species. 644
GEOLOGY.
W ITH regard to Geology, as a Palætiological Science, I do not
know that any new light of an important kind has been thrown
upon the general doctrines of the science. Surveys and
examinations of special phenomena and special districts have been
carried on with activity and intelligence; and the animals of which the
remains people the strata, have been reconstructed by the skill and
knowledge of zoologists:—of such reconstructions we have, for
instance, a fine assemblage in the publications of the
Palæontological Society. But the great questions of the manner of
the creation and succession of animal and vegetable species upon
the earth remain, I think, at the point at which they were when I
published the last edition of the History.