Community Oral Health Practice for the

Dental Hygienis 3rd Edition Geurink

Test Bank
Go to download the full and correct content document:
https://testbankfan.com/product/community-oral-health-practice-for-the-dental-hygieni
s-3rd-edition-geurink-test-bank/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...

Community Oral Health Practice for the Dental Hygienist

4th Edition Christine Test Bank

https://testbankfan.com/product/community-oral-health-practice-
for-the-dental-hygienist-4th-edition-christine-test-bank/

Oral Pathology for the Dental Hygienist 7th Edition

Ibsen Test Bank

https://testbankfan.com/product/oral-pathology-for-the-dental-
hygienist-7th-edition-ibsen-test-bank/

Oral Pathology for the Dental Hygienist 6th Edition

Ibsen Test Bank

https://testbankfan.com/product/oral-pathology-for-the-dental-
hygienist-6th-edition-ibsen-test-bank/

Oral Pharmacology For The Dental Hygienist 2nd Edition

Weinberg Test Bank

https://testbankfan.com/product/oral-pharmacology-for-the-dental-
hygienist-2nd-edition-weinberg-test-bank/
Community Public Health Nursing Practice Health for
families and Populations 5th Edition Maurer Test Bank

https://testbankfan.com/product/community-public-health-nursing-
practice-health-for-families-and-populations-5th-edition-maurer-
test-bank/

Foundations of Nursing in the Community Community

Oriented Practice 4th Edition Stanhope Test Bank

https://testbankfan.com/product/foundations-of-nursing-in-the-
community-community-oriented-practice-4th-edition-stanhope-test-
bank/

Community Health Nursing in Canada 3rd Edition Stanhope

Test Bank

https://testbankfan.com/product/community-health-nursing-in-
canada-3rd-edition-stanhope-test-bank/

Community Public Health Nursing Promoting the Health of

Populations 5th Edition Nies Test Bank

https://testbankfan.com/product/community-public-health-nursing-
promoting-the-health-of-populations-5th-edition-nies-test-bank/

Foundations for Population Health in Community Public

Health Nursing 5th Edition Stanhope Test Bank

https://testbankfan.com/product/foundations-for-population-
health-in-community-public-health-nursing-5th-edition-stanhope-
test-bank/
Geurink: Community Oral Health Practice for the Dental Hygienist,
3rd Edition
Chapter 06: Oral Health Programs in the Community

Test Bank

MULTIPLE CHOICE

1. Dental caries:
a. is transmissible.
b. is an acute disease.
c. can be prevented.
d. a and c

ANS: D
Dental caries is a transmissible chronic disease that can be prevented.

REF: p. 168

2. School-based pit and fissure sealant programs reduce dental caries as much as __%.
a. 50
b. 60
c. 70
d. 80

ANS: B
They reduce dental caries as much as 60%.

REF: "p. 183, 184"

3. Evidenced-based practices means:

a. things that seem to be true over time.
b. what is seen in clinical practice.
c. those that have been scientifically proven to be effective.
d. the consensus of what clinicians believe is true.

ANS: C
Evidenced-based practices are those that have been scientifically proven to be effective,
as opposed to empirical, or what people believe to be true.

REF: p. 169

Copyright © 2011 Saunders, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Test Bank 6-2

4. Which of the following is the federal government’s principal agency for protecting
the health of all Americans?
a. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)
b. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
c. National Institutes of Health (NIH)
d. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)

ANS: A
DHHS is the federal government’s principal agency. DHHS is the largest grant-making
agency in the federal government. DHHS works with state and local governments and
funds services at the local level through state or county agencies or through private
sector grantees. The rest of the choices are public health service operating divisions of
the DHHS.

REF: p. 169

5. Approximately __% of the states have full-time dental directors who provide
leadership and guidance in the planning, funding, and implementation of oral health
promotion programs for the residents of the states they serve.
a. 50
b. 66
c. 75
d. 90

ANS: B
Approximately two thirds of the states have full-time state dental directors of oral health
promotion programs. These programs vary in their scope of services and organization
across the United States. A state’s program may include, in addition to the state dental
director, regional dental directors, public health educators, clinical dentists, dental
hygienists, and dental assistants who provide oral health services to underserved
populations.

REF: p. 169

6. Many individual county and city health departments have federally funded clinics
that offer services on a sliding scale fee schedule and accept clients who receive
public assistance through:
a. Medicare.
b. Medicaid.
c. the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).
d. workforce development.

ANS: B

Copyright © 2011 Saunders, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Test Bank 6-3

The clinics accept clients who are receiving public assistance through Medicaid. These
clinics employ both public health dentists and dental hygienists and sometimes have
supplemental clinical coverage provided by local dental professionals. Hours of
operation are also tailored to best meet the needs of the population that they serve.

REF: p. 170

7. The Essential Public Health Services for Oral Health:

a. describe the roles of state oral health programs.
b. were developed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
c. have been used in the development and evaluation of public health activities at the
state level.
d. a and c

ANS: D
The Essential Public Health Services for Oral Health were developed by the Association
of State and Territorial Dental Directors. These guidelines describe the roles of state oral
health programs and have been used in the development and evaluation of public health
activities at the state level.

REF: p. 170

8. An oral health coalition is:

a. a division of the Department of Labor.
b. a cooperative effort on the part of many individuals and organizations to build
systems and develop programs that improve community health.
c. a collaboration between dental schools and dental hygiene programs.
d. a yearly event that provides care for low-income individuals with no out of pocket
expense.

ANS: B
An oral health coalition is a cooperative effort on the part of many individuals and
organizations to build systems and develop programs that improve community health.
For example, the Washington State Oral Health Coalition was formed in 1993 to further
improvements in oral health. It has proved to be an excellent means of bringing
dedicated professionals together to resolve oral health issues through policy
development. Anyone interested in achieving the goal of optimal oral health for
Washington residents is invited to join.

REF: p. 170
9. The community is viewed as the patient in public health, and ____________ can be
compared with the evaluation of the patient’s treatment.
a. assessment
b. planning
c. implementation
d. evaluation

Copyright © 2011 Saunders, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Test Bank 6-4

ANS: D
Evaluation and review of the program can be compared with the evaluation of the
patient’s treatment. The community survey is comparable to the patient’s examination
for assessment. The program plan and implementation are similar to the treatment plan
and the treatment of the patient.

REF: p. 172

10. Implementation:
a. is an organized and systematic approach to identify a target group and to define the
extent and severity of oral health needs present.
b. is an organized response to reduce or eliminate one or more problems.
c. includes the process of putting the plan into action and monitoring the plan’s
activities, personnel, equipment, resources, and supplies.
d. is the method of measuring results of the program against objectives developed
during the early planning stages.

ANS: C
Implementation includes the process of putting the plan into action and monitoring the
plan’s activities, personnel, equipment, resources, and supplies. This step should include
feedback from personnel and participants as well as ongoing evaluation mechanisms.

REF: p. 172

11. Which of the following is true of formative evaluation?

a. It involves judging the merit or worth of a program after it has been in operation.
b. It is an attempt to determine whether a fully operational program is meeting the
goals for which it was developed.
c. It is an examination of the processes or activities of a program as they are taking
place.
d. a and b

ANS: C
Formative evaluation, or the internal evaluation of a program, is an examination of the
processes or activities of a program as they are taking place. Summative evaluation
involves judging the merit or worth of a program after it has been in operation. This step
is an attempt to determine whether a fully operational program is meeting the goals for
which it was developed.

REF: p. 172

12. If a community’s perception of needs is adhered to exclusively, actual clinical health

problems may go untreated because:
a. funding is limited.
b. people are not knowledgeable about many areas of health care.

Copyright © 2011 Saunders, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Test Bank 6-5

c. there are differences between wants and needs.

d. desires are endless.

ANS: B
People are not knowledgeable about many areas of health care. The solution to this
dilemma involves striking a delicate balance between negligence and overzealousness.
Although it is unethical to impose one’s own perceptions on a community, it is the
professional’s responsibility to inform people of existing problems and their
consequences.

REF: p. 173

13. Developing goals and objectives is a part of the _________ process during the
development of an oral health program in the community.
a. assessment
b. planning
c. implementation
d. evaluation

ANS: B
Developing goals, objectives, and program activities is part of the planning process.
During this stage, it is essential to have community involvement and participation. The
formulation of program goals and objectives is an active process, offering specific
proposals for changes to be made in the community.

REF: p. 174

14. Which of the following is the key to a measurable objective?

a. The time frame
b. The performance verb
c. The condition
d. A specific goal

ANS: B
The performance verb is the key to a measurable objective; it is an action word, such as
“write,” “demonstrate,” or “recite.” The performance verb is essential in writing a
measurable objective. The inclusion of a condition and a criterion makes the objective
more specific and useful to the learner.

REF: p. 174

15. Which area of program planning describes how the objectives will be accomplished?
a. Program goals
b. Program objectives
c. Program activities
d. Program implementation

Copyright © 2011 Saunders, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Test Bank 6-6

ANS: C
Program activities describe how the objectives will be accomplished. In planning these
program activities, one must carefully consider the type of resources available as well as
program restraints.

REF: p. 175

16. The implementation phase of program planning should answer ________, which in
this case are the activities required to achieve the objective.
a. who
b. what
c. when
d. why

ANS: B
The strategy should answer who (the individuals responsible for each activity), what (the
activities required to achieve the objective), when (the chronologic sequence of events),
and why (the effect of the objective to be achieved).

REF: p. 175

17. Using a smaller population for a community oral health program with the intent to
expand later on is called:
a. test marketing.
b. pilot testing.
c. a stratified sample.
d. testing the waters.

ANS: B
It is called pilot testing. This implementation strategy allows for an opportunity to test
the program’s effectiveness and provides ease in control and monitoring of the program
activities. A pilot program provides useful information and enables decisions to be made
about the future of the program. Piloting is a form of evaluating the implementation.

REF: p. 175

18. Which of the following is the first step in evaluation of a community oral health
program?
a. Examine the specific measurable objectives.
b. Evaluate the measurable outcomes.
c. Perform pilot testing.
d. Review the program goals.

ANS: D

Copyright © 2011 Saunders, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Test Bank 6-7

The first step in evaluation is to review the program goals and then examine the specific
measurable objectives. The data that are obtained through measuring the objectives are
called the measurable outcomes. Each objective should be reviewed to determine how
well it is meeting the program goals.

REF: p. 176

19. Which of the following is true for evaluation of a community oral health program?
a. Evaluation determines whether the program accomplishes what it was designed to
accomplish.
b. A summary of what went well and what did not is adequate.
c. A negative outcome means that the program has been a failure.
d. Drawing conclusions based on intuition is adequate.

ANS: A
Evaluation determines whether a program has accomplished what it was designed to
accomplish. The objectives themselves must be specifically addressed. Summarizing
what went well and what did not or drawing conclusions based on intuition is not
adequate. A negative outcome does not mean that the program has been a failure.

REF: p. 176

20. If the objectives of a community health program are not met, it does not mean a
program is a failure because:
a. the workers were reimbursed for their time.
b. if a program is evaluated properly in some sense, it has been a success.
c. some form of care was delivered to the public.
d. at least the implementers tried.

ANS: B
If a program is evaluated properly so that negative outcomes become learning
experiences and indicators of future programming and research, it has been a success in
some sense. Formative evaluation during the implementation process can point out
problems and identify opportunities to correct program deficiencies early on.

REF: p. 176

21. Which of the following has been recognized as one of the top ten public health
measures of the 20th century?
a. Cosmetic bonding
b. Fluoridation of water
c. Silver dental amalgam
d. Porcelain fused to metal crowns

ANS: B

Copyright © 2011 Saunders, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Test Bank 6-8

Fluoridation has been recognized as one of the top ten public health measures of the
20th century. As a result of the general availability of public water sources to most
people, the adjustment of the natural fluoride content found in the water to levels
optimal for combating oral disease has proven to be a successful public health measure.

REF: p. 176

22. The average number of decayed, missing (because of caries), or filled permanent
teeth (DMFT) steadily declined from 1967 to 1992 in the United States because of:
a. improved oral hygiene.
b. populations residing in fluoridated communities.
c. improvements in the design of toothbrushes.
d. the use of dental floss.

ANS: B
The average number of DMFT steadily declined from 1967 to 1992 because of
populations residing in fluoridated communities.

REF: p. 177

23. The total population receiving community water fluoridation was __% in 2006.
a. 41.5
b. 51.5
c. 61.5
d. 71.5

ANS: C
As of 2006, the total population receiving adjusted community water fluoridation was
61.5%, up from 57.6% in 2000. Approximately 184 million U.S. residents currently
benefit from community water fluoridation. The target is 75% of the population.

REF: p. 178

24. The mean annual per capita cost is lower in community water fluoridation systems
for larger populations (>50,000) than it is for smaller populations (<10,000). The
lifetime cost of fluoridation per person is less than the cost of one dental filling.
a. Both statements are true.
b. Both statements are false.
c. The first statement is true; the second statement is false.
d. The first statement is false; the second statement is true.

ANS: A
The mean annual per capita cost of community water fluoridation ranges from $0.68 for
systems with a population greater than 50,000 to $3.00 for systems with fewer than
10,000 people. The lifetime cost of fluoridation per person is less than the cost of one
dental filling.

Copyright © 2011 Saunders, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Test Bank 6-9

REF: p. 178

25. The recommended levels for water fluoridation in the United States range from 0.7
to 1.2 parts per million (ppm) of fluoride, depending on the:
a. size of the population younger than 14 years of age.
b. average daily temperature for that area.
c. proximity to an ocean.
d. cost.

ANS: B
The recommended levels for water fluoridation depend on the average daily temperature
for that area. This range is based on the hypothesis that water consumption increases
with increasing climatic temperature. This assumption may not be as accurate as earlier
research indicates because of the increased use of air conditioning and the increased
consumption of soft drinks and bottled water.

REF: p. 180

26. Which of the following offers the benefits of fluoride in a structured environment in
communities where a public water source is not available or where community water
fluoridation is undesired for various reasons?
a. Fluoridated salt
b. Fluoride supplemented sports drinks
c. School-based fluoride mouth rinse programs
d. Fluoridated chewing gum

ANS: C
School-based fluoride mouth rinse programs offer the benefits of fluoride in a structured
environment. The mouth rinse program is administered by school personnel or
volunteers on a weekly basis to participating children. The children rinse for 60 seconds
with 10 mL of 0.2% sodium fluoride.

REF: p. 180

27. Advantages of community water fluoridation over a community-based fluoride

supplement program include:
a. reduced need for compliance.
b. lower installation and startup costs.
c. decay prevention and oral health benefits for the entire population.
d. a and c

ANS: D

Copyright © 2011 Saunders, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Test Bank 6-10

The need for compliance over an extended period of time is a major procedural and
economic disadvantage of community-based fluoride supplement programs. Although
the total costs of the purchase of supplements and administration of a program are small
compared with the installation and start-up costs associated with fluoridation equipment,
the overall cost of supplements per child is much greater than the per capita cost of
community water fluoridation. Community water fluoridation provides decay prevention
and oral health benefits for the entire population.

REF: p. 181

28. Fluoride varnish:

a. is self-applied by the patient at home.
b. is intended to be permanent, much like dental sealant.
c. may be used to prevent root surface caries on adults with gingival recession.
d. a and c

ANS: C
Varnishes may be used to prevent root surface caries on adults with gingival recession.
The varnish is applied by an operator, with a recommended twice-yearly reapplication
for optimal benefit. The varnish is not intended to be permanent, like a sealant, but to
hold the fluoride in contact with the tooth for a period of time.

REF: p. 181

29. Which of the following is the most cost-effective, most practical, and safest means
of preventing tooth decay?
a. Dental sealants
b. Regular dental visits
c. Community water fluoridation
d. Fluoride varnish

ANS: C
Even though other sources of fluoride are available and despite the increased risk of
fluorosis, community water fluoridation remains the most cost-effective, the most
practical, and the safest means of preventing tooth decay.

REF: p. 182

30. Which of the following is true regarding antifluoridationists?

a. They provide inaccurate false information to the public.
b. Their arguments against fluoridation do have some merit based on scientific
knowledge.
c. They attempt to link adverse health effects with fluoridation.
d. a and c

ANS: D

Copyright © 2011 Saunders, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Test Bank 6-11

Antifluoridationists provide inaccurate false information to the public and to elected

officials and attempt to link adverse health effects with fluoridation. Their arguments
against fluoridation do not have any merit based on scientific knowledge. The economic
and health benefits of fluoridation for millions of Americans have been confirmed in
numerous studies by renowned scientists.

REF: p. 183

31. Which of the following is true of dental sealants?

a. Little increase in the percentage of school-aged children with sealants has occurred
among children in low-income populations.
b. One goal of Healthy People 2010 was to have 90% of children receiving dental
sealants on their permanent molars.
c. According to the 1988 to 1994 baseline data, about 51% of 14-year-old adolescents
had dental sealants on their permanent molars.
d. Dental insurance will not reimburse for sealants.

ANS: A
Little increase has occurred among children in low-income populations. One goal of
Healthy People 2010 was to have 50% of children receiving dental sealants on their
permanent molars. According to the 1988 to 1994 baseline data, only 23% of 8-year-old
children and 15% of 14-year-old adolescents had dental sealants on their permanent
molars.

REF: p. 183

32. To reach the Healthy People 2020 goal of increasing the proportion of children who
have received dental sealants on their molar teeth, many states have instituted:
a. reimbursement through dental insurance programs.
b. expansion of dental assisting and dental hygiene educational programs.
c. school-based sealant programs (SBSPs).
d. educational grants for sealant placement in public health programs.

ANS: C
Many states have instituted SBSPs. In some programs, mobile dental vans are sent to
schools, and the sealants are applied in the van. In other programs, portable equipment is
transported from school to school and is set up in available space.

REF: p. 183
33. For health education programs to be effective:
a. the cognitive model alone has proven to be effective in producing change.
b. the participant must be actively involved in the learning process.
c. internal rather than external factors should be considered in developing an oral
health educational program.
d. external rather than internal factors should be considered in developing an oral
health educational program.

Copyright © 2011 Saunders, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Test Bank 6-12

ANS: B
The participant must be actively involved in the learning process. The cognitive model
alone (attitude + knowledge = behavior change) has been ineffective in producing
change. Both internal and external factors should be considered in developing an oral
health educational program. The outcome of the oral health educational process will be
successful only if all factors are considered.

REF: p. 184

34. Most dental educational programs have been implemented for:

a. children.
b. adolescents.
c. adults.
d. the elderly.

ANS: A
Oral health education for children is a priority because of the high prevalence of dental
caries in this group. If a society free of dental disease is the goal, educational programs
must be targeted for the future of society—the children.

REF: p. 185

35. Which of the following represents the correct sequence for the five-step lesson plan
described by Gagliardi?
1. Guided practice activities
2. Anticipatory planning
3. Instruction/information
4. Closure
5. Objectives
a. 1, 2, 5, 1, 3
b. 5, 2, 3, 1, 4
c. 2, 5, 3, 1, 4
d. 2, 5, 1, 3, 4

ANS: C
The five-step lesson plan described by Gagliardi includes preparation, anticipatory
planning, objectives, instruction/information, guided practice activities, and closure.

REF: p. 186

36. Approximately __% of Americans visit a dental office yearly.

a. 20
b. 40
c. 60
d. 80

Copyright © 2011 Saunders, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Test Bank 6-13

ANS: C
Approximately 60% of Americans visit a dental office yearly. Cost is a major reason
why people do not see a dentist. People often wait to visit a dentist only in emergencies.
Financial barriers and geographic access have become reasons why people do not
receive primary prevention.

REF: p. 190

37. Establishment of a dental home begins no later than ___ year(s) of age and includes
referral to dental specialists when appropriate.
a. 1
b. 3
c. 6
d. 12

ANS: A
Establishment of a dental home begins no later than 1 year of age. The dental home is
the ongoing relationship between the dentist and the patient, inclusive of all aspects of
oral health care delivered in a comprehensive, continuously accessible, coordinated, and
family-centered way.

REF: p. 191

38. The fastest growing segment of the population in the United States is:
a. children.
b. adolescents.
c. young adults.
d. older adults.

ANS: D
Between 1990 and 1994, the number of older adults increased 11-fold. These people are
now the fastest growing segment of the population in the United States. The Census
Bureau projects that the number of persons age 65 years and older will more than double
by the middle of the twenty-first century to approximately 80 million.

REF: p. 191

39. Which one of the following federal initiatives that provide funding to states
administers the Head Start program?
a. Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)
b. Administration for Children and Families (ACF)
c. Children’s Health Insurance Plan Reauthorization Act (CHIPRA)
d. Medicaid (Title XIX)

ANS: B

Copyright © 2011 Saunders, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Test Bank 6-14

Administration for ACF, an agency of the Department of Health and Human Services, is
responsible for 60 programs that provide assistance to needy children and families,
including the administration of the Head Start program, which serves approximately
900,000 preschool children annually.

REF: p. 194

40. A federally qualified health center (FQHC) has been designated by the federal
government by adhering to regulations pertaining to the scope and quality of health
services provided to anyone:
a. with a substance abuse problem.
b. regardless of ability to pay.
c. older than 18 years of age.
d. who has served in the military.

ANS: B
An FQHC has been designated by the federal government by adhering to regulations
pertaining to the scope and quality of health services provided to anyone, regardless of
ability to pay.

REF: p. 194

Copyright © 2011 Saunders, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
képest hittem is neki. Sőt még többet közölhetek önnel: a fentebbi
adatokat, hogy ön megbizhatatlan, ingatag, csélcsap és
szoknyavadász, éppen az ön tisztelt barátjától kaptam.
– Tessék!?
– Igen, tőle. Bulcsutól. Tőle.
„Tőle.“ Ez volt a szép özvegy utolsó szava. De azt már Pető nem
hallotta. A jogász ész nélkül kapott kalapja után és vad vágtatásban
robogott át a zenészhez.
A Nero szerzője otthon volt és a gérokkját tisztogatta, hogy az
ódon ruhadarab méltó legyen az eljegyzéshez.
– Bulcsu! – rontott be ajtóstól a házba a diák. – Mit tettél velem!?
Szerencsétlen ember, mit tettél velem!?
A zenész rémülten ejtette ki kezéből a gérokkot.
– Mit tettem!? – dadogta kétségbeesve.
– Hogy mit? – kacagott fel pokolhoz hasonlóan Pető. –
Tönkretettél, elpusztitottál, a kétségbeesésbe löktél! Végem van,
igen, végem, – tette hozzá és oly elkeseredéssel ült le egy székbe,
hogy az menten összeroppant alatta.
– De beszélj hát! – könyörgött a zeneszerző, lábra segitve
barátját. – Én nem tudok semmiről sem! Én nem tettem semmit
ellened, hiszen örök hálára vagyok neked lekötelezve!
Pető iparkodott összeszedni magát. Az okos ember még
kétségbeesésében sem veszti el a fejét. Azért tehát ő is
csillapodásra intette idegeit, azután igy szólt:
– Te azt mondottad Jozefinnek, hogy én csélcsap vagyok, hogy
tréfából sem mondok igazat, hogy szoknyákra vadászok?
Bulcsu komolyan intett fejével.
– Igen, azt mondtam neki.
 Pető a padmalyig ugrott mérgében.
– Azt beszélted neki, hogy hazudom, hogy korhelykedem, hogy
minden nőnek utána futok és egyben tagadod, hogy tönkretettél,
megcsaltál, kétségbeesésbe döntöttél engemet, legjobb barátodat!?
Miféle erkölcseid vannak, te szerencsétlen! miféle erkölcseid!?
Bulcsu tágranyilt szemmel nézett barátjára.
– Miféle erkölcseim? Azt hiszem, a legjobbak. Igaz ugyan, hogy a
hazugság magában véve nem szép, de gyakran célravezető s a cél
szentesiti az eszközöket. Ha azt mondottam rólad, hogy haszontalan
fráter vagy, az volt a tervem, hogy téged diadalra juttassalak
Jozefinnél. Hiszen tőled tanultam, hogy a Bauernebeleket
ellentmondással lehet a nekünk kivánatos véleményre birni. Ha
valamiről a Bauernebeleknek azt mondjuk, hogy az fehér, ők örök
ellentmondásra hajló lelkitulajdonságuknál fogva azt fogják rá
kijelenteni: „Nem igaz. Fekete!“ Hiszen ez a rendszer fényesen
bevált nálam, megkiséreltem tehát nálad is és éppen ezért
feketitettelek be Jozefinnél. Ez az ellenpont, ahogy mi zenészek
mondjuk, – fejezte be szavait a Nero szerzője, – avagy contredanse,
ahogy ti jogászok hivjátok.
Pető előtt egyszerre kitisztult a helyzet. Teringettét, ez más!
Szegény Bulcsu, titokban segiteni akart rajta és amilyen
szerencsétlen ember, éppen a jóindulatával döntötte kátyuba a
szekeret. A jogásznak akaratlanul is nevetnie kellett a komédián.
– Na, ezt megcsináltad, muzsikus, – jelentette ki a Nero
álmélkodó szerzőjének. – A helyzet tudniillik az, hogy Jozefin
mindent elhitt neked, szóról-szóra, ahogy elmondtad.
– Elhitte? – esett le Bulcsu álla. – Oh, én tökfej! Oh, én
százszoros tökfej!
A szegény ex-fagottista kétségbeesve rohant fel és le
szobájában, azután hirtelen szökéssel kint termett a folyosón s
ahogy volt, kalap, kabát nélkül, rohant át Jozefinhez. A szolgák nem
akarták beereszteni, de a zenész félrelökte őket és betört a szép
asszonyhoz, térdreborult előtte és sirva mondotta el neki az egész
dolgot, ugy, ahogy volt, a tudatos hazugságok indokait, az
ellenpontot, amelynek csalhatatlanságában oly szentül hitt s amely,
ime, ekkora keveredést idézett fel.
– Soha többé nem teszem, Jozefin! – esküdött meg végül Bulcsu.
– Csak az egyszer bocsásson meg! csak az egyszer, különben a
Dunának megyek!
És kedves Jozefin megbocsátott a Nero szerzőjének, mi több, hitt
is neki, mert hiszen, aki szeret, az ugyis szivesen hisz.
Igy történt, hogy pár hét mulva a második eljegyzés is
megtörtént, abban a reményben, hogy Pető mielőbb leteszi a
vizsgáit és beáll komoly ügyvédnek. A jogász ezt megigérte, meg is
tartotta s két év mulva már cifra cimtábla fityegett az irodája előtt.
Pöre az mindjárt akadt. Tudniillik, egy borzalmas dolog történt, amire
még ki kell terjeszkednem.
Egy napon kiderült, hogy Maurer, a rejtélyes csizmadia
annakidején nem halt meg, csak gyorsan elköltözött régi lakásáról és
azért terjesztette halála hirét, hogy a hitelezői ne zaklassák. Évek
mulva azonban Maurer jobb módba került és egy meggondolatlan
pillanatában elment a régi Bauernebel-házba, megnézendő,
megvannak-e még a galambjai? A galambok azonban már nem
voltak meg, épp egy héttel előbb vette át őket a város és
agyonlövette a pecérrel valamennyit. Maurer persze nem hagyta a
dolgát, valaki a fejébe magyarázta, hogy neki nemcsak az egykori
galambokra, de azok leszármazóira is joga van s miután ezek
eltüntek, Bauernebel kártéritéssel tartozik neki. A csizmadia kötélnek
is állott és bepörölte az arany polgárt.
Képzelhetni Pető rémületét, amikor egy nap beállitott hozzá az
apósa – aki, mióta megbékült a várossal és Jozefinnel, senkivel sem
veszekedhette ki magát – és azt a kijelentést tette:
– No, öcsém! Tudod-e, mi ujság? Nagy dolog! Holnap tovább
folytatjuk a galamb-pört! Itt van Maurer és rajtam követeli a gerlicéit!
Az ifjuval forogni kezdett a világ.
 Megint a galambok! Ismét előkerülnek hát a métermázsás
pöriratok, elleniratok, felebbezések, megint felvonulnak a tanuk, a
hatósági emberek, az eltünt örökösök, az eltünt hagyatéki tárgyak: a
csirizestál és az ár! Nem, nem, elég volt belőlük!
– Kedves Jeromos! – inditványozta megilletődve Pető. – Hagyjuk
ezt a tengeri kigyót békén nyugodni. Fizessen tiz pengőt Maurernek
és az ügy el van intézve.
– És az igazság!? – kiáltott fel Bauernebel, akiben pokolian égett
a vágy pörlekedni. – Odaadjam az igazamat, a jogomat? Soha! Csak
tessék pörölni! Majd megmutatom én annak a csizmadiának, hogy
Bauernebel Jeromossal nem lehet kikezdeni! Fiat justitia, pereat
mundus! Tessék csak felvenni a pört! Ezer ördög! majd befütök én
annak a csizmadiának!
(VÉGE.)
 *** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK AZ ARANY
POLGÁR ***

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S.

copyright law means that no one owns a United States copyright in
these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it
in the United States without permission and without paying copyright
royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part of
this license, apply to copying and distributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept
and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and
may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following the
terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use of
the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very
easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as
creation of derivative works, reports, performances and research.
Project Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given
away—you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with
eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject
to the trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.

START: FULL LICENSE

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
 PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free

distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work (or
any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project
Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at
www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and

Redistributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works
1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™
electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree
to and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your
possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be
bound by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from
the person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in
paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be

used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people
who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a
few things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic
works even without complying with the full terms of this agreement.
See paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with
Project Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this
agreement and help preserve free future access to Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the
Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the
collection of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the
individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the
United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in
the United States and you are located in the United States, we do
not claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing,
performing, displaying or creating derivative works based on the
work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of
course, we hope that you will support the Project Gutenberg™
mission of promoting free access to electronic works by freely
sharing Project Gutenberg™ works in compliance with the terms of
this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg™ name
associated with the work. You can easily comply with the terms of
this agreement by keeping this work in the same format with its
attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when you share it without
charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the
United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms
of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying,
performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this
work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes
no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in
any country other than the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other

immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must
appear prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™
work (any work on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or
with which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is
accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
 This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United
States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away
or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License
included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you
are not located in the United States, you will have to check the
laws of the country where you are located before using this
eBook.

1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is derived

from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not contain a
notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the copyright
holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in the
United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must
comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through
1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project
Gutenberg™ trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted

with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works posted
with the permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of
this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project

Gutenberg™ License terms from this work, or any files containing a
part of this work or any other work associated with Project
Gutenberg™.

1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this

electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
Gutenberg™ License.
1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form,
including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you
provide access to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work
in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in
the official version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website
(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain
Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the
full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,

performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works
unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing

access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
provided that:

• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”

• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who

notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that
s/he does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™
License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
 copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and
discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of Project
Gutenberg™ works.

• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of

any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in
the electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90
days of receipt of the work.

• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg™

electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of
the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set
forth in Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend

considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe
and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating
the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the medium on which they may
be stored, may contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to,
incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription errors, a
copyright or other intellectual property infringement, a defective or
damaged disk or other medium, a computer virus, or computer
codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except

for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph
1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner
of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party
distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work under this
agreement, disclaim all liability to you for damages, costs and
expenses, including legal fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO
REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF
WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE
FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY
DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE
TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL,
PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE
NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you

discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it,
you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by
sending a written explanation to the person you received the work
from. If you received the work on a physical medium, you must
return the medium with your written explanation. The person or entity
that provided you with the defective work may elect to provide a
replacement copy in lieu of a refund. If you received the work
electronically, the person or entity providing it to you may choose to
give you a second opportunity to receive the work electronically in
lieu of a refund. If the second copy is also defective, you may
demand a refund in writing without further opportunities to fix the
problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied

warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted
by the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the
Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the
Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any
volunteers associated with the production, promotion and distribution
of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless from all liability,
costs and expenses, including legal fees, that arise directly or
indirectly from any of the following which you do or cause to occur:
(a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b)
alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any Project
Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any Defect you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of

Project Gutenberg™
Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers.
It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and
donations from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the

assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s
goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will
remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a
secure and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future
generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help,
see Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at
www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project

Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification
number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West,

Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up
to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website
and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to

the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation
Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without
widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can
be freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the
widest array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small
donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax
exempt status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating

charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and
keep up with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in
locations where we have not received written confirmation of
compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of
compliance for any particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where

we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no
prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in
such states who approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make

any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of
other ways including checks, online payments and credit card
donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project

Gutenberg™ electronic works
Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be
freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of
volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed

editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™,

including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how
to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.