Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The download Test Bank for Corrections 2nd Edition by Stohr ISBN 1412997178 9781412997171 full chapter new 2024
The download Test Bank for Corrections 2nd Edition by Stohr ISBN 1412997178 9781412997171 full chapter new 2024
https://testbankpack.com/download/test-bank-for-corrections-the-
essentials-2nd-edition-by-stohr-isbn-1483372243-9781483372242/
https://testbankpack.com/download/test-bank-for-corrections-from-
research-to-policy-to-practice-1st-edition-by-stohr-
isbn-1483373371-9781483373379/
https://testbankpack.com/download/test-bank-for-introduction-to-
corrections-2nd-edition-hanser-1506306756-9781506306759/
https://testbankpack.com/download/test-bank-for-american-
corrections-10th-edition-clear-reisig-
cole-1133049737-9781133049739/
Solution Manual for American Corrections 10th Edition
Clear Reisig Cole 1133049737 9781133049739
https://testbankpack.com/download/solution-manual-for-american-
corrections-10th-edition-clear-reisig-
cole-1133049737-9781133049739/
https://testbankpack.com/download/test-bank-for-busn-2nd-edition-
by-kelly-isbn-0176555307-9780176555306/
https://testbankpack.com/download/test-bank-for-essential-
calculus-2nd-edition-by-stewart-isbn-1133112293-9781133112297/
https://testbankpack.com/download/test-bank-for-economics-2nd-
edition-by-hubbard-obrien-isbn-013600332x-9780136003328/
https://testbankpack.com/download/test-bank-for-business-
statistics-2nd-edition-by-donnelly-isbn-0321925122-9780321925121/
Stohr/Walsh, Corrections: A Text/Reader (Second Edition) Instructor Resources
Section II:
A History of Corrections
Multiple Choice (36)
1) In 1831, which pair came to America with the intention to study the newly minted prison
system? (c)
a. Bentham and Beccaria
b. Howard and Penn
c. Beaumont and Tocqueville
d. Dix and Maconochie
2) Which of the following was a benefit when examining the extent of punishment among tribal
groups? (e)
a. Gender
b. Wealth
c. Status
d. Both a and c
e. Both b and c
3) What was the first type of correctional facility to develop? (c)
a. Day reporting centers
b. Prisons
c. Jails
d. Bridewells
4) In Ancient Greece and Rome, citizens who broke the law might be subjected to: (e)
a. Fines
b. Exile
c. Imprisonment
d. Death
e. All of the above
5) King Henry II required that gaols be built for the purpose of: (c)
a. Extorting fine money from citizens
b. Removing the poor from the streets
c. Holding the accused for trial
d. All of the above
Stohr/Walsh, Corrections: A Text/Reader (Second Edition) Instructor Resources
6) The Catholic church had their greatest influence on punishment during: (a)
a. The Middle Ages
Stohr/Walsh, Corrections: A Text/Reader (Second Edition) Instructor Resources
b. Elizabethan England
c. The Reform Era
d. None of the above
7) Galley slavery was used more regularly: (b)
Stohr/Walsh, Corrections: A Text/Reader (Second Edition) Instructor Resources
d. William Penn
15) Which Enlightenment Period influenced reformer created the panopticon? (a)
a. Jeremy Bentham
b. Cesare Beccaria
c. John Howard
d. William Penn
16) Which Enlightenment Period influenced reformer sought reform in every gaol throughout
England and Europe? (c)
a. Jeremy Bentham
b. Cesare Beccaria
c. John Howard
d. William Penn
17) Which Enlightenment Period influenced reformer was also influenced by his Quaker religious
principles? (d)
a. Jeremy Bentham
b. Cesare Beccaria
c. John Howard
d. William Penn
18) Which Enlightenment Period influenced reformer instituted his Great Law which deemphasized
the use of corporal and capital punishment for all but the most serious crimes? (d)
a. Jeremy Bentham
b. Cesare Beccaria
c. John Howard
d. William Penn
19) Which Enlightenment Period influenced reformer was imprisoned in the Great Tower of London
for his promotion of his religion and defiance of the English Crown? (d)
a. Jeremy Bentham
b. Cesare Beccaria
c. John Howard
d. William Penn
20) The influence of religion on early prison operations in the United States is due primarily to: (b)
a. The Shakers
b. The Quakers
c. Enlightenment thinkers
d. Presbyterians
21) Which of the following is one of the early institutions built in America that followed the Quaker
principles and ideas? (c)
a. Newgate Prison
b. San Quentin
c. Walnut Street Jail
d. All of the above
22) The first jail in America, built around 1606, was located in: (a)
a. Jamestown, Virginia
b. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Stohr/Walsh, Corrections: A Text/Reader (Second Edition) Instructor Resources
30) Beaumont and Toqueville attributed the first ideas of American prison reform to ?
(a)
a. Pennsylvania
b. New York
c. Ohio
d. Massachusetts
31) The Eastern State Penitentiary had what before the White House? (c)
a. Security guards
b. On site garden
c. Central Air
d. None of the Above
32) What scandal(s) did Cherry Hill face 5 years after its construction? (d)
a. Prisoner communication
b. Double occupancy
c. Prisoner labor
d. All of the above
33) Who led the movement to establish separate prisons for women? (a)
a. Women
b. Men
c. Wardens
d. The Quakers
34) What was missing from the first confinement of women in penitentiaries? (d)
a. Matrons
b. Discipline
c. Solitary
d. All of the Above
True/False (26)
1) True or False? Beaumont and Tocqueville came to the United States but did not observe
anything wrong with the systems that they studied. (F)
2) True or False? One of the constant themes in corrections is that money, or a lack thereof is a
factor that exerts over virtually all correctional policy decisions. (T)
3) True or False? Prisons and other such institutions serve as a social control mechanism. (T)
4) True or False? Religious influence is not one of the themes that are apparent in corrections
history. (F)
5) True or False? Among tribal groups, the wealthy and poor were treated equally under the eyes
of punishment. (F)
6) True or False? The use of imprisonment can be traced back to the Old Testament in the Bible. (T)
7) True or False? The Protestant church had its greatest influence on punishment in the Middle
Ages. (F)
Stohr/Walsh, Corrections: A Text/Reader (Second Edition) Instructor Resources
8) True or False? Galley Slavery was only used to get the poor off the streets. (F)
9) True or False? Under 18th century England, a person could receive the death penalty for rioting
over wages or food. (T)
10) True or False? Brideswells provided a location to send poor people in order to remove them
from the streets. (T)
11) True or False? The practice of transportation was short-lived in the correctional system. (F)
12) True or False? Americans continued to transport their prisoners well after the Revolutionary
War. (F)
13) True or False? Historically, prison labor was considered part of an inmate’s punishment, rather
than solely a means of revenue. (T)
14) True or False? The Progressive period was the era that spelled out major changes incorrectional
reform and gave rise to such great thinkers as Cesare Beccaria. (F)
15) True or False? John Howard believed that English gaols treated inmates inhumanely and needed
to be reformed. (T)
16) True or False? William Penn is credited with creating the panopticon, which was the first prison
ever to be constructed. (F)
17) True or False? William Penn proposed the Great Law, which deemphasized the use of corporal
punishment and capital punishment for all crimes, but the most serious. (T)
18) True or False? One of the oldest American prisons was a copper mine. (T)
19) True or False? The first jail built in America was in Philadelphia Pennsylvania in 1790. (F)
20) True or False? Dorothea Dix was the first warden of the Elmira Reformatory. (F)
21) True or False? The state of Ohio shocked Beaumont and Tocqueville by the barbarous state of
its prisons compared to its mildness of its penal code. (T)
22) True or False? Beaumont and Toqueville extensively covered the Southern states in their
outline of American prisons. (F)
23) True or False? In the reading Norman Johnston proclaimed Cherry Hill as “the most influential
prison ever built.” (T)
24) The architect of the “most influential prison ever built” was Samuel Wood. (F)
25) The first penitentiary conditions for women were “worse than death”. (T)
26) Mount Pleasant was the first state penitentiary to include a nursery. (T)
7) Though they created separate deterrence theories, on what specifics did both Bentham and
Beccaria agree? (p. 20-21)
8) Bentham believed that his creation, the panopticon, would greatly enhancing supervision of
inmates by melding which two ideas? (p. 20-21)
9) What did William Penn’s Great law seek to achieve? (p. 21)
10) Why were Southern prisons little used prior to the Civil War? (p. 30-31)
Essay (8)
1) What key events as described in the text facilitated the widespread use of gaols in England? (p.
16-17)
2) Discuss the history of gallery slavery from its first uses to its end as well as the rationale behind
it. (p. 17)
3) Compare and contrast the separation (classification) of inmates from early Brideswells with
those of the early European and British Prisons. (p. 18)
4) Discuss the history of transportation from its first uses to its end, as well as the rationale behind
it. (p. 18-19)
5) What was the significance of the enlightenment on correctional thinking? (p. 19)
6) Pick one of the four Enlightenment Period reformers discussed in detail from the text. What did
they believe in regards to reforming corrections? How did they propose to promote such
reform? (p. 19-21)
7) Discuss the Pennsylvania and New York Systems. Which do you believe was better from
inception? Why? (p. 24-27)
8) What is the Declaration of Principles? Do you think they should be applied to our system today
(in part or in whole)? Why or why not? (p. 28-29)
10) Discuss some of the negative observations of the Ohio prison in “Much and Unfortunately
Neglected”. What were the causes? (p. 56-57)
11) Who led the reform on segregation near the end of the nineteenth century in “Much and
Unfortunately Neglected” and what grudging changes proceeded it? (p. 60-62)
12) Where was Mount Pleasant constructed? Why was it significant for its time? (p. 62-65)
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
The nature of the bacterial invasion is of more interest to the
pathologist than to the surgeon as such. In general, however, it may
be said that, in addition to the ordinary pyogenic organisms, the
colon bacilli are perhaps the most frequently to blame, while the
more putrid types are the result of actual escape of bacteria from the
intestine, as through a perforated appendix, and the addition of a
mixed type to one which began perhaps as a simple one. Thus in the
so-called putrid forms multiple bacterial contamination is usually
discovered upon making cultures. The pneumococcus, the capsule
bacillus, and the gonococcus are also not infrequently found, in
cases of peritonitis whose nature and origin will be suggested by the
discovery of the particular germ involved in each case.
Symptoms.—While varying much in time and intensity, and even
completely changing their type during the successive
stages of the disease, there are, nevertheless, certain cardinal
symptoms which are universally recognized in cases of surgical
peritonitis. These include vomiting, pain, tenderness, with more or
less shock, followed sooner or later by abdominal spasm and
distention, while to these symptoms there is sure to be added bowel
obstruction of some type which becomes, toward the end, perhaps
the most profound feature, and which may even mask the
significance of other symptoms. According as the lesion is localized
or generalized pain may be referred to a particular area or may be
general and intense. Local pain, with tenderness, usually implies, at
least at first, a localized lesion, and is not so likely to be
accompanied by vomiting as the more diffuse form. Depression is
found to correspond largely to the type and degree of sepsis, while
collapse is a prominent feature in the more severe cases. The pain,
which is sometimes intense, subsides, and it should be emphasized
that a speedy subsidence is not necessarily a favorable symptom. It
too often marks the transition of an ordinarily acute case into one of
intensely septic or even putrid type. Tenderness may be acute and
localized, or diffuse and only evoked on deep pressure. One of the
most significant symptoms is abdominal rigidity, which persists
throughout the active state of the disease, and which, when followed
or accompanied by meteorism, may to some extent mask and
obscure all conditions within. If the patient be not seen until this
stage is reached diagnosis can be made only by history and
conjecture, for it is almost impossible to determine anything by
palpation.
Temperature is an uncertain factor. It sometimes rises high at first,
and then falls, while if it fall too low the prognosis is serious. The
pulse also shows very irregular variations, usually rising, however, as
the disease becomes more severe, and being often almost
uncountable at the end. A combination of rising pulse and falling
temperature is of serious import.
In addition to the vomiting, which is a pronounced early feature of
the disease, we have, as bowel obstruction comes on, an added
fecal character to the vomitus, which sometimes is most
characteristic of complete obstruction. This obstruction is due in part
to toxic paralysis of the muscular coat of the bowels, and in part to
the result of adhesions or fixations by which bowel motility is
completely prevented. Thus in many instances of peritonitis following
acute appendicitis there are loops of intestine glued together by
exudate in such a way as to practically occlude or disable them.
The depression, shock, and final collapse of the disease are
characteristic, as is also the facial appearance, the cheeks becoming
discolored and the orbits hollowed out, so that the eyes early sink
back. Other expressions of diminished blood pressure are not
lacking—coldness of the extremities; cold, clammy perspiration;
lividity of the skin, and the like.
While this is a picture of the most common expressions of acute
septic or surgical peritonitis, it is occasionally found that conditions
equally serious arise without such marked symptoms, and that the
patients become rapidly worse, finally dying, who neither vomit
continuously nor show extreme meteorism nor abdominal rigidity.
Such cases are thereby stamped as those of more extreme toxicity,
where systemic reaction is paralyzed almost from the outset, and are
accordingly the more hopeless on that account.
Ordinarily it is not difficult to recognize the onset and the course of
peritonitis in surgical cases. The condition may be confounded with
one of septic intoxication from some focus which has not involved
the peritoneum; otherwise differentiation is rarely difficult. The
occurrence of such a condition does not necessarily indicate faulty
technique on the part of an operator, as the condition is too often
present when the surgeon begins his work. On the other hand, it too
often follows faulty technique and constitutes the strongest argument
for vigilance both in preparation, performance, and after-treatment.
Treatment.—But little will be said here about non-operative
treatment, although first it should be emphasized that
treatment in the past was too often of the non-operative type. Many
cases of peritonitis could be saved by operation were it performed
while the infection is still localized, but this is at a period when they
too rarely reach the surgeon’s hands, he being called in as such
when the inefficacy of drug treatment has been already
demonstrated. Without denying that the surgeon is not blameless in
all these respects, blame should, nevertheless, be placed where it
properly belongs, at the door of the man who fails to recognize and
carry out plain surgical principles.
The opium treatment for peritonitis, with which the name of Clark
will always be associated, was introduced at a time when many
things were considered as peritonitis which were not necessarily
such. It was furthermore an advance on previous methods and gave
better results. That, however, is no excuse for adhering to it when
better means are at hand. On the other hand it must not be denied
that much can be done medicinally to give comfort and meet certain
indications. In spite of the many disadvantages attaching to the use
of opiates it seems unnatural to let patients suffer as they would
without them. It is justifiable, then, to use them in cases which are
hopeless, or in those which refuse operation; but given
indiscriminately and early they often mask symptoms which, if
properly appreciated, would lead to early diagnosis, and, it is to be
hoped, early operative relief. Views also differ regarding catharsis. It
is a great disadvantage to permit the intestines to retain fecal matter
for days and add a consequent copremia to the other features of the
disease. On the other hand, intestinal activity tends to disseminate
infection, and is, consequently, most undesirable. If at the outset the
intestinal canal could be emptied and then left at rest it would best
meet the somewhat contrary indications.
Ordinarily, however, it is of small advantage to keep bombarding
the stomach with repeated doses of laxatives which are more often
rejected than retained, and which have little effect.
One of the most distressing features is vomiting, and here it is well
to follow Berg’s suggestion and test the vomitus with litmus paper. If
it be found alkaline small doses of morphine should be given, each
with a drop or two of aromatic sulphuric acid, in a little chopped ice. If
it be found acid small doses of milk of magnesia are advised or
some such preparation, with minute doses of morphine, frequently
repeated. The greatest relief in these cases, where the upper bowel
is emptying itself into the stomach, will be obtained from lavage. In
the same way tympanites and meteorism are best treated by passing
a rectal tube high, leaving it in place, and utilizing it for lavage of the
bowel, using warm water with a little sodium salicylate. Not the least
distressing feature of such a case is the reflex hiccough which is
produced by diaphragmatic spasm, since the phrenic nerve
distributes sensitive fibers as well to the peritoneum. For this there is
no really effective remedy. Small doses of Siberian musk, with or
without morphine, beneath the skin will sometimes quickly relieve it.
Depression and lowered blood pressure are best treated by
adrenalin and digitalis, rather than by strychnine, which stimulates
peristalsis. Fever, when high, should be treated by cold sponging
rather than by antipyretics. The kidneys should be kept active, if
necessary by hypodermoclysis, and the skin equally so by hot-air
baths, as through both of these emunctories much elimination may
be effected. The question of catharsis comes up again in considering
what can be done to improve elimination of ptomains by watery
stools, but these are hard to secure; it is, after all, questionable
whether their effectiveness in this regard has not been greatly over-
rated. Richardson, for instance, is inclined to believe that cases
reported as cured by free catharsis would, in all probability, have
recovered without it, it being doubtful whether the really infectious
element be present.
Surgical treatment of peritonitis includes a recognition of the
cause, and, if possible, its removal. Richardson has grouped in the
following suggestive manner the indications for operative
intervention in the early stages, when cases are not without hope:
General pain, becoming local; or local, becoming general,
according to cause;
Tenderness, showing the same indications;
Abdominal rigidity;
Green vomitus;
Rising pulse and temperature;
Diminished peristalsis without too much shock.
On the other hand, in cases of fully developed peritonitis, where
the surgeon may still consider the possibility of intervention, but
where prognosis is far less favorable, the conditions include:
Lessening or vanishing pain;
More general tenderness;
Great distention, replacing rigidity;
Excessive dark or fecal vomitus;
Obstipation;
Rapid and feeble pulse;
Pain extremely severe;
Low temperature and the ordinary evidences of reduced blood
pressure.
In such cases the decision rests largely upon the degree of
collapse. To operate upon a moribund patient is hopeless and brings
discredit upon surgery. Before operating upon any serious case of
this kind the circumstances should be fully explained to those
concerned, and they should be impressed with the fact that should
the patient die he dies not in consequence of the operation but in
spite of it.
The operation itself will in a large measure depend upon what can
be learned of the etiology of the disease and the diffuseness of the
resulting infection. To reach a localized focus the incision may be
made at any point which will best afford access; but in dealing with a
generalized process the middle line, and an extensive incision, will
ordinarily afford the best opportunity for doing whatever is necessary.
The preliminary incision may be made short, as for exploratory
purposes. Unless a loop of distended bowel be at once blown into
the opening there will be prompt escape of fluid, whose character will
reveal much of what has gone wrong within. If reasonably clear the
operator is fortunate. If it be purulent he has to combat a most
serious condition; if it be offensive, it is probably due to
contamination from a septic abscess or from intestinal gases, while if
the fluid be nondescript and contain floating particles of fecal matter
there is an intestinal or gastric perforation. So soon as one comes
upon fixation or adhesion of viscera he will find lymph, in condition of
greater or less organization. Inside the masses thus bound together
he will probably find the greatest centre of pernicious activity.
The more one sees of these intra-abdominal conditions the more
respect he, as a surgeon, feels for the omentum. Only recently have
surgeons learned to appreciate the kindly activities of this duplicature
of the peritoneum, with its slight or heavy load of contained fat. It
manifests a tendency which may be almost regarded as a sagacity
or instinct for shifting itself toward a local focus of infection, and there
throwing out lymph by which it becomes attached and helps to form
a protective barrier that often is most effective. Were it not for this
tendency many cases of acute appendicitis, for instance, which now
recover would be lost during the early days of the attack, in
consequence of a quickly disseminated infection. Thus a
gangrenous appendix, or hernia, or gall-bladder, is frequently so
wrapped up in a protective layer of omentum that the operator has
first to detach this, or go through it, before he comes upon the actual
site of the trouble. Some such disposition of the omentum, then, may
be easily discovered during the earliest moments of his exploration,
and if later he conclude to remove a portion of it, because of actual
or impending gangrene, he nevertheless sacrifices it with a feeling of
regret because of the good it has already done.
The further treatment of these cases is essentially a matter of what
can be done to remove the exciting cause. Questions of gravest
import, and often difficult of immediate decision, will present in nearly
every case; as, for instance, whether to resect a portion of intestine,
to remove a gall-bladder, to hunt for an appendix when embarrassed
with the difficulty of the effort and necessity for widely separating
intestinal coils, or of the treatment of distended bowel, which it may
perhaps be impossible to restore to place, of extensive and complete
flushing of the abdominal cavity, or of mere local cleanliness. And
after these questions have been decided, and action taken, there
comes still the question of drainage, with the wisdom of or necessity
for counteropening, as in the loin or in the cul-de-sac, and the
character of drain to be used. As to what should be attempted in
general there will rarely be much room for doubt. As to how best to
accomplish it should be decided according to the training, the
experience, and the opportunities of the operator, and the nature of
the environment. When the entire peritoneal cavity is invaded, and
flooded with more or less infectious material the more thoroughly it
can be washed out the better. At the same time to do this with any
degree of even apparent thoroughness requires practical
evisceration of the patient, and an amount of time spent and shock
produced by handling the viscera, which are exceedingly depressing
and may of themselves be more than can be borne. The meteorism,
which is so conspicuous a feature of most of these cases, means the
distention of the bowel to such a degree that when once the
intestines lie upon the surface of the body they can usually be
restored with the greatest difficulty; and this would raise the question
of the desirability of either one or more punctures, through which gas
should be allowed to escape, or a sufficiently wide opening, with the
introduction of a Monk tube, and the complete emptying both of gas
and putrefying fecal matter. The latter is certainly in theory the much
more desirable measure, if the patient’s condition will only justify it.
Probably after pelvic drainage the Fowler semi-sitting posture in bed
would be desirable, while after high drainage the Trendelenburg
position, with the pelvis higher than the thorax, would be preferable.
If free abdominal irrigation is to be practised a large quantity of
warm sterile saline solution should be used, to which may be added
perhaps a small proportion of acetozone or of mercury bichloride.
The silver salts also make equally effective and less irritating fluid,
the nitrate being used in the proportion of 1 to 10,000, or the citrate
or lactate in proportion of 1 to 500 or 1 to 1000. These metallic salts
will coagulate the albuminoid fluids and give to the peritoneum an
opaque appearance, which, however, need cause no alarm.
Another question of importance is that of enterostomy. In some of
these cases the acute bowel obstruction is the most predominating
and distressing late feature, and an enterostomy may be attempted,
even though it be known it will serve but a temporary purpose, in
order to relieve distress. There never can be more than sentimental
objection to it, in such cases, with the possibility of something more
than mere temporary relief. It can be effected under local cocaine
anesthesia, by attaching to the parietal peritoneum the first loop of
distended small intestine that presents, and, after firmly fixing it in
place, making a small opening, and then preferably inserting a glass
or other tube for better drainage purposes.
These constitute the precautions to be followed and the advice to
be given in cases of septic or surgical peritonitis. How successful
they may be, or how satisfactory the termination of the case, cannot
be foretold by statistics nor by reports of cases in the hands of
others. Success will depend in large measure upon the early or late
period at which the case is thus treated, and upon the general
surgical discretion and experience of the operator. It is probable that
disappointment will result more often than success. Nevertheless
every life thus saved is one snatched from a certainly fatal
termination without it, and if successful but once in ten times one life
has thereby been saved that may be worth saving, without saving
the other nine. While I would advise to make the attempt in any case
which offers a reasonable prospect of success, caution should be
used against doing it without a full understanding with those
concerned that it is an effort in the right direction, concerning which
no promise can be made; death results not from the operation so
much as in spite of it.
Summarizing, briefly, the best methods of treating a diffuse septic
peritonitis we may agree with Le Conte,[53] that they consist of the
following measures: The least possible handling of peritoneal
contents, the elimination of time-consuming procedures, most
perfect drainage of the pelvis by a special suprapubic opening, as
well as free drainage through the operative incision, the semi-sitting
posture of the patient after its conclusion, the prevention of peristaltic
movements by withholding all fluids by the mouth, and perhaps by
small amounts of opium, and the absorption of large quantities of
water through the rectum, by which there may be produced a
reversal of the current in the lymphatics of the peritoneum, making it
a secreting rather than an absorbing surface and increasing urinary
secretion. It is inexpedient to waste time sponging peritoneal
surfaces or wiping away lymph, for danger of septic absorption is
increased rather than diminished. Patients with diffuse septic
peritonitis bear brief operations fairly well, but prolonged ones badly;
therefore a minimum amount of work should be done.
[53] Annals of Surgery, February, 1906.
TUBERCULOUS PERITONITIS.
Acute or chronic tuberculosis of the peritoneum assumes usually,
first, the miliary form, after which, in the slow cases, infiltration and
great thickening occur to such an extent as to alter the appearance,
texture, and behavior of the peritoneum itself. It is rarely a primary
condition, but is usually secondary to some other tuberculous focus,
which may be one or more of the mesenteric nodes, these being
involved in consequence of infection from the alimentary canal; or
the peritoneum may be easily infected either from the genito-urinary
tract or directly from the intestine. In children, the most common path
of infection is through the mesenteric nodes; in females, through the
Fallopian tubes, and in males, either through the intestine or the
kidneys or ureters. The peritoneum, under these circumstances,
behaves very much as does the pleura, in the presence of acute or
chronic tuberculous lesions which extend to and involve it. Thus it
may become so thickened, and even “leathery,” as to have lost all its
original characteristics, and to appear more like a dense, firm
membrane than in its original semblance.
Peritoneal tuberculosis appears in three different types: A
fibrinoplastic type, characterized especially by adhesions; an
ulcerative and sometimes absolutely suppurative form, marked
always by the presence of pus and pyoid; and an ascitic type,
characterized by leakage of increasing amounts of serum and the
development of well-marked ascites.
The first, or fibrinoplastic, is a localized lesion, and leads to the
formation of dense adhesions, as, for instance, between a Fallopian
tube and the pelvic walls or the other viscera. As the disease
spreads all the tissues become matted together in a mass which
renders them almost indistinguishable, frequently much resembling
malignant disease. In some instances it may be possible to remove
the entire affected area. At other times it is best to let it alone.
The ulcerative form is characterized by more general symptoms of
conspicuous febrile type. It produces rapid loss of strength and
weight, frequently attended with evidences of intestinal ulceration
and with abdominal tenderness and pain. A certain proportion of
these cases justify exploration, though but few of them will be found
favorably disposed for radical surgical measures.
The ascitic type is characterized by rapid accumulation of fluid,
with accompanying malaise and debility. As the abdomen distends
and the diaphragm is pushed upward respiration becomes more
difficult and rapid. A certain protrusion of the umbilicus also
characterizes many of these cases. Their course is not so febrile, but
it may be possible, especially in the early stages, to make out some
enlargement of mesenteric nodes, or involvement of the viscera,
which will aid in diagnosis. It is most common in children, but it may
be met with at any age. In general such a collection of fluid, which
cannot be accounted for by recognizable disease of the heart, liver,
or kidneys may be suspected to be tuberculous.
Treatment.—Treatment of tuberculous peritonitis should be
surgical when possible. This statement is based partly
upon the fact that it is so commonly a secondary condition. Such
treatment will depend, in large measure, upon the extent to which it
may be possible to remove any exciting foci of the disease; but
experience shows that even this is not always necessary to bring
about a cure, as in those cases of the ascitic type where it is
desirable only to wash out the abdominal cavity and close it again,
this simple procedure seeming to suffice.
It is the cases of the ascitic type which seem most benefited by
incision and irrigation, usually without drainage, and it is these which
are perhaps as hopeless as any under non-operative treatment. It
was Van de Warker, of Syracuse, who, in 1883, first recognized the
value of simple irrigation in these cases, and while at present we find
it impossible to explain the benefit which so often and so rapidly
accrues, the measure is universally recognized as that offering the
most hope. This, like every other surgical procedure, should be
practised early rather than late, preferably so soon as diagnosis is
made, or, when this is difficult, it should be made a part of an
exploratory operation intended partly for diagnostic purposes. The
measure itself is simple. A small opening in the middle line, between
the pubis and the umbilicus, permits free escape of all contained
fluid, which should be facilitated by changing the position of the
patient, thus preventing plugging of the opening by presenting bowel.
Every drop which can escape having been removed, the abdomen is
then flushed repeatedly with either warm saline solution or a plain
watery solution of acetozone, 1 to 1000, or silver lactate or citrate, in
the same proportion or a little stronger. My own preference has
always been for the latter, and with a silver solution I have obtained a
large degree of success. There is no objection to leaving a small
amount of either of these fluids in the abdominal cavity—i. e., no
more than an ordinary effort to empty it before closing the wound. An
incision one inch long, made for this purpose, will serve nearly every
indication. Through it the parietal peritoneum, as well as that
covering numerous loops of intestine, can be inspected, and through
it also a finger may be inserted for exploratory purposes, for the
detection of mesenteric nodular disease or of any other focus.
Should any serious local condition be revealed which might be
benefited by radical measures, this would be the time to practise
them.
Before closing the wound margins it would be well to thoroughly
disinfect them, for over them has flowed infected fluid, and we
sometimes see tuberculous foci develop at this point. This fact
explains also the disadvantage obtaining in these cases of making
drainage openings. They serve their purpose admirably for a short
time, but, becoming thus infected, lead to the establishment of
tuberculous fistulas and sinuses, which may call for subsequent
operation. Fecal fistula may even be a more remote consequence.
As the peritoneum is approached it will be found more or less
altered, and there may even be observed bowel or omentum
adherent behind it; therefore caution must be observed.
A final caution should also be given in order that we may avoid
mistaking that form of ascites which is frequently seen in connection
with cancer of the abdominal viscera extended to the peritoneum,
and particularly that form spoken of as miliary carcinosis or miliary
sarcomatosis, for a tuberculous collection. While surgeons are
occasionally deceived, one will usually find much in the history of the
case, and in the results of local examination, which may save
making this error, if it be so regarded; but, in effect, the opening and
the evacuation will give relief, even though this character of the
disease makes it less amenable to help from any such source.
C H A P T E R X LV I I .
INJURIES AND SURGICAL DISEASES OF THE
STOMACH.