Waste stabilization

pond

Waste stabilization ponds (WSPs or stabilization ponds or waste stabilization lagoons) are
ponds designed and built for wastewater treatment to reduce the organic content and remove
pathogens from wastewater. They are man-made depressions confined by earthen structures.
Wastewater or "influent" enters on one side of the waste stabilization pond and exits on the
other side as "effluent", after spending several days in the pond, during which treatment
processes take place.

Schematic of the three main types of waste stabilization

ponds (WSPs): (1) anaerobic, (2) facultative and (3) aerobic
(maturation), each with different treatment and design
characteristics[1]

Waste stabilization ponds are used worldwide for wastewater treatment and are especially
suitable for developing countries that have warm climates.[2] They are frequently used to treat
sewage and industrial effluents, but may also be used for treatment of municipal run-off or
stormwater. The system may consist of a single pond or several ponds in a series, each pond
playing a different role in the removal of pollutants. After treatment, the effluent may be returned
to surface water or reused as irrigation water (or reclaimed water) if the effluent meets the
required effluent standards (e.g. sufficiently low levels of pathogens).

Waste stabilization ponds involve natural treatment processes which take time because removal
rates are slow. Therefore, larger areas are required than for other treatment processes with
external energy inputs. Waste stabilization ponds described here use no aerators. High-
performance lagoon technology that does use aerators has much more in common with the
activated sludge process. Such aerated lagoons use less area than is needed for traditional
stabilization ponds and are also common in small towns.[3]

Fundamentals

Waste stabilization pond at Grand

Agadir, Morocco (Station M’zar)

Effluent from a high rate algae pond

and two maturation ponds in Attaouia,
Morocco. Note the green color,
caused by algae.
Concept of stabilization
Sewage and many types of industrial wastewaters contain organic matter. If wastewater is
discharged untreated into surface water bodies (for instance, rivers and lakes), their organic
matter serves as food for microorganisms living in the surface waters. These organisms use the
organic matter for energy generation for their growth and reproduction. This is done via their
respiration, in which they convert the organic matter into carbon dioxide and water. These stable
components do not cause water pollution problems. Therefore this is frequently called
"stabilization" of the organic matter.

However, these organisms use oxygen in their respiration, thus reducing the oxygen
concentration in the surface waters. This is one of the main water pollution problems, which
may affect the surface water biota, including fish.[4][5]

Waste stabilization ponds reproduce these biological phenomena before they take place in the
receiving surface water and cause the pollution problems due to oxygen consumption. The
ponds receive wastewater, and, by natural processes similar to those that take place in the
surface waters, carry out stabilization of the organic matter inside them, as part of the
treatment. This is why they received the name of waste stabilization ponds.[6]

Microorganisms
The reactions take place by the joint participation of several microorganisms living within the
pond. The organic matter is measured as biochemical oxygen demand (BOD). BOD values in the
pond effluent are lower than in the influent, reflecting the removal of organic matter. This pond
biome uses organic matter from the wastewater as food.

Nutrients are converted to cell material and energy for life processes including reproduction and
growth of living cells. Some of these living cells will be consumed by organisms at higher trophic
levels within the pond. In ponds, the most important group of microorganisms are bacteria,
which utilize most of the organic matter from the wastewater, but also consume oxygen.
Algae are another essential group of microorganisms. They do not depend on the organic
material from the influent. Instead, they undertake photosynthesis, in which they produce the
organic matter for their own consumption and, very importantly here, they release oxygen. The
excess oxygen released supports the respiration done by the aerobic organisms in the pond.
Atmospheric oxygen is also dissolved into the liquid, which assists in maintaining an aerobic
layer on the top of the pond surface.

Oxygen levels
The oxygen concentration varies in the liquid column: Close to the surface, concentrations are
high and support the growth of aerobic organisms. Close to the pond bottom, sunlight
penetration is low, and thus photosynthetic activity is reduced. This causes oxygen
concentrations to be low there. Finally, inside the sediments in the bottom layer, there is no
oxygen at all. Here, organic matter is removed by digestion undertaken by anaerobic
organisms.[6]

A poorly maintained anaerobic

treatment pond in Kariba, Zimbabwe
(sludge needs to be removed)

Removal of pathogens
Pathogens can be efficiently removed in waste stabilization ponds. The process relies mostly on
maturation ponds for removal of pathogens, although some removal also takes place in the
other ponds of the system. The higher the number of ponds in the series, the more efficient the
pathogen removal.

Removal of pathogenic bacteria and viruses occurs mainly by inactivation. Pathogens are
inactivated as a result of a complex interaction of mechanisms that involve pH (the pH value in
ponds is high because of algal photosynthesis), temperature, ultraviolet radiation present in the
sunlight that reaches the pond surface and photooxidative reactions taking advantage of high
dissolved oxygen concentrations.[7][8]

Protozoan pathogens are present in the wastewater in the form of cysts or oocysts. Helminths
(worms) are present in the form of eggs. The protozoan and helminth pathogens can be
removed by the mechanism of sedimentation.[8] Very high removal efficiencies may be achieved,
especially if maturation ponds are part of the treatment system. In that case, the final pond
effluent may be in compliance with World Health Organization guidelines for irrigating with
treated wastewaster (or "reclaimed water").[9] However, sludge (sediment) from the ponds may
be heavily contaminated with helminth eggs, which may survive even after several years of
storing the sludge inside of the pond.[10]
Types

Main configurations of waste stabilization pond systems

Waste stabilization ponds consist of man-made basins comprising a single or several series of
anaerobic, facultative or maturation ponds.[11] The presence or absence of oxygen varies with
the three different types of ponds, used in sequence. Anaerobic waste stabilization ponds have
very little dissolved oxygen, thus anaerobic conditions prevail. The second type of pond,
facultative stabilization ponds, sustain an aerobic surface habitat above an anaerobic benthic
habitat.[12] Maturation ponds offer aerobic conditions throughout, from the surface to the
bottom.

The main configurations of pond systems are:[4][13]

Facultative pond only;

 Anaerobic pond followed by a
facultative pond;
Facultative pond followed by maturation
ponds in series;
Anaerobic pond followed by a
facultative pond followed by maturation
ponds in series.
If an anaerobic pond is present, part of the suspended solids from the wastewater settles, thus
removing the organic matter (BOD) contributed by these solids. Additionally, some of the
dissolved organic matter is removed by anaerobic digestion. During the second stage in the
facultative pond, most of the remaining BOD is removed mainly by the heterotrophic bacteria
that receive oxygen from the photosynthesis undertaken by algae. The main function of the
tertiary stage in maturation ponds is the removal of pathogens, although it may also assist in
nutrient reduction (i.e. nitrogen).[12] However, nitrogen fixation by algae living in stabilization
pond systems may increase nitrogen levels in stabilization pond effluent.[6]

Anaerobic ponds
Anaerobic ponds receive raw wastewater. They have a smaller surface area compared to
facultative ponds and are also deeper (usually 3.0 to 5.0 m). The depth decreases the influence
of oxygen production by photosynthesis, leading to anaerobic conditions. Depending on loading
and climatic conditions, these ponds are able to remove between half to two thirds of the
influent BOD. This significantly decreases the load of organic matter that goes to the facultative
ponds, and thus decreases their required size.[4] Anaerobic stabilization ponds have the
disadvantage of potentially releasing malodorous gases. This especially includes hydrogen
sulfide with an odor of rotten eggs, if the system has operational problems.[14]

The first pond biome in a series of stabilization ponds digests the putrescible solids suspended
in the wastewater being treated. Anaerobic ponds allow solids to settle down at the bottom as
sludge. This settling removes a portion of the particulate organic material.[14] A large fraction of
the settled solids will accumulate close to the point where wastewater enters the pond.
Therefore, anaerobic ponds must be designed to be far deeper than either aerobic or facultative
ponds. The depth decreases the oxygen levels so anaerobic bacteria can efficiently digest the
waste.[14] Anaerobic ponds contain anaerobic organisms which are able to break down complex
organic waste into basic compounds that are less harmful to the environment.[15] Because
anaerobic organisms can only thrive in warm temperatures, anaerobic ponds are not suitable in
temperate or cold climates.

Sludge accumulates at the bottom of the anaerobic ponds and needs to be removed every few
years.

Facultative ponds

Facultative pond in Ruai, Kenya

Facultative stabilization ponds that receive raw wastewater are called primary facultative ponds.
If they are receiving wastewater that has already been treated in anaerobic ponds, they are
called secondary facultative ponds. Facultative stabilization ponds may also be used for
treatment following other types of treatment processes such as upflow anaerobic sludge
blanket (UASB) reactors, oxidation ditches or aerated lagoons. Compared with anaerobic ponds,
facultative ponds are shallower (1.5 to 2.5 m deep) and have much larger surface areas. The
surface area is important because it allows atmospheric oxygen to dissolve and sunlight
radiation to penetrate the water. This allows for photosynthetic activity to occur which produces
more oxygen.

In most ponds both bacteria and algae are needed in order to maximize the decomposition of
organic matter and the removal of other pollutants.[15] Algae produce oxygen (photosynthesis)
and also consume oxygen (respiration), but they leave an excess of oxygen that can then be
used by aerobic bacteria for respiration and for the processes of oxidation (or stabilization) of
the organic matter in the wastewater.

Several types of invertebrates are present in the ponds where they control the population of
algae, which then settles to the bottom.[15] Heavy algal growth may block sunlight from
penetrating into the pond. This decreases the potential for photosynthesis to contribute oxygen
to the pond.

In the treatment of sewage, systems composed of anaerobic ponds followed by facultative

ponds usually have overall BOD removal efficiencies between 75 and 85%. Higher efficiencies
are difficult to achieve because the effluent contains high concentrations of particulate organic
matter, in the form of algae, naturally produced during treatment.

The sludge comprising the sediment layer in the pond undergoes anaerobic digestion, and may
accumulate for several years without needing removal.

Maturation ponds
Some additional removal of organic matter and other pollutants may be achieved in maturation
ponds. These ponds are only included in the treatment line when high efficiencies of pathogen
removal are required, either for discharge of the treated effluent in surface water bodies, or for
use for irrigation or aquaculture. They are usually used after facultative ponds, but may also
follow other treatment processes, such as upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors.[16]
They could also be placed after an activated sludge process.

Maturation ponds must be shallow (around 1.0 m depth or less) with a great surface area so
that more oxygen can dissolve into the water giving the bacteria enough oxygen to properly
function.[14] Shallow ponds benefit from high photosynthetic activity arising from the penetration
of solar radiation. The pH values are high because of intense photosynthesis, and ultraviolet
radiation penetration takes place in the upper layers. Both of these factors promote the removal
of pathogenic bacteria and viruses. Given the high surface area of the maturation ponds,
protozoan cysts and helminth eggs are also removed, with sedimentation as the main
mechanism.[8][6]

Sludge accumulation is very low in maturation ponds.

Very high pathogen removal efficiencies may be achieved, depending on several factors:
temperature, hydraulic retention time (the amount of time the liquid remains in the system - from
entrance to exit), the number of ponds in the series, the presence of baffles and the depth of
ponds.[8]

Maturation ponds may be used in combination with a rainwater reservoir to form an ecological,
self-purifying irrigation reservoir.[17][18]

Application and suitability

Waste stabilization ponds are very efficient in their primary objective of removing organic matter
and, under some conditions, pathogenic organisms. Their design criteria have changed very little
over the years.[15] Ponds are simple to design, build, operate and maintain, which is very
important in remote areas and in developing countries where sophisticated equipment and
highly skilled labor is not easily available. Construction may be done by local contractors in
small towns.

Waste stabilization ponds work well in nearly all environments and can treat most types of
wastewater.[6] They are particularly well-suited for tropical and subtropical countries because the
intensity of the sunlight and temperature are key factors for the efficiency of the removal
processes.[6] Ponds are used throughout the world. In many countries and regions ponds are the
most widely used treatment process. For this reason, they are one of the processes
recommended by WHO for the treatment of wastewater for reuse in agriculture and aquaculture,
especially because of their effectiveness in removing nematodes (worms) and helminth eggs.[9]

Ponds cannot achieve very high efficiencies in the removal of organic matter, and usually have
low capacities for removing nitrogen and phosphorus. The effluent usually has high
concentrations of suspended solids, resulting from algal production in the ponds. Therefore,
ponds are not a suitable technology in areas where stringent discharge standards exist, unless
additional stages of post treatment are included.[19][14]

Since ponds require large areas, they may not be practical in proximity to towns where land is
expensive. A suitable topography and a suitable soil structure are also desired, in order to reduce
construction costs.

Operation and maintenance

Facultative pond at Parque

Fluminense Treatment Plant in Ceara,
Brazil

Regarding operation and maintenance, the tasks performed by the operational staff are very
simple and do not require special skills. Additionally, there is no energy consumption for
aeration, no need of heavy equipment maintenance and no frequent sludge removal, sludge
treatment and disposal.

Ponds require very little maintenance, since there is no heavy electric or mechanical equipment
that requires attention. The only routine maintenance needed is on the preliminary treatment
(cleaning of screens and removal of sand), routine checking of pipes, weirs and other hydraulic
structures, and removal of unwanted vegetation growth in embankments. [6][4]
Sludge removal
Sludge accumulates inside the ponds. It needs to be removed only in the interval of several
years. This is an important advantage of the system. However, when removal is necessary, it is
usually an expensive and labor-intensive operation. Removal is more frequent in anaerobic
ponds (every few years), because of their smaller volume and lower capacity to store the sludge,
compared with facultative ponds. In facultative ponds, sludge removal may be necessary only in
intervals around 15 to 25 years. In maturation ponds, sludge accumulation is very low.[6]

Sludge removal, also called desludging, may be done in two basic ways: (i) interrupting the
operation of the pond for desludging or (ii) keeping the pond in operation while desludging.[6] In
the first case, the influent wastewater to the pond to be desludged is closed. Afterwards, the
pond is drained and the bottom sludge is left for open drying for several weeks. During this
period, the wastewater to be treated needs to be diverted to other ponds in the system. After the
sludge has dried, its removal may be done manually (very laborious in large ponds) or
mechanically using tractors or mechanical scrapers. In the second alternative, when the pond is
left in operation during desludging, the removed sludge will be wet and will require further drying.
This is undertaken outside the pond. Sludge removal can be by suction and pumping using
vacuum trucks (only for small ponds), dredging, pumping from a raft or involving other
mechanical equipment. In either case, the amount of sludge to be removed is very high,
considering its accumulation over a period of years. This process is very laborious, expensive
and requires careful planning.[6]

Costs
In the selection of a wastewater treatment process, besides the technical aspects that are
relevant to each alternative, also cost factors play a very important role. The latter can be
basically divided into (i) construction costs and (ii) operation and maintenance costs. Waste
stabilization ponds are usually considered a cheap alternative in terms of construction costs.
However, the final costs will depend essentially on the size of ponds, presence of maturation
ponds in the process configuration, topography, soil conditions, groundwater level and land
cost.[6]

Because all these elements are site-specific, it is difficult to generalize overall construction
costs. In most cases these will be lower compared with other wastewater treatment
alternatives.[20][4] Depending on the specific situation of the area, construction costs can
increase and level up with other technologies.

Waste stabilization ponds are one of the cheapest wastewater treatment processes in terms of
operation and maintenance.[6]

Comparison with other

infrastructure
The following types of water and wastewater infrastructure may superficially resemble waste
stabilization ponds, but are not the same:

Aerated lagoons rely upon mechanical

aerators to provide oxygen to stabilize
organic matter. Aerated lagoons may be
used as the first stage in the treatment
line instead of anaerobic ponds to limit
release of malodorous gases, but with
energy and maintenance requirements
causing higher operating costs.
Constructed wetlands are designed to
improve water quality by supporting
rooted vegetation arranged to physically
remove solids and particulate material
while removing soluble nutrients in the
water by uptake into plant tissue and
supplying oxygen to the water to reduce
BOD.
Retention basins are used to manage
stormwater runoff to prevent flooding
and downstream erosion, and improve
water quality in an adjacent river,
stream, lake or bay. Detention basins are
 similar but are "dry ponds" designed to
temporarily hold runoff as a flood
control measure.
Infiltration basins are ponds designed to
percolate their contents into underlying
permeable soils.
Settling basins are designed to separate
solids from wastewaters without
provision for treatment of those solids.

See also

Industrial wastewater treatment

Lagoon
List of waste water treatment
technologies
 Natural swimming pond
Organisms used in water purification

References

1. Tilley, E., Ulrich, L., Lüthi, C., Reymond, Ph.,

Zurbrügg, C. (2014) Compendium of
Sanitation Systems and Technologies -
(2nd Revised Edition) (http://www.eawag.c
h/forschung/sandec/publikationen/compe
ndium_e/index_EN) . Swiss Federal
Institute of Aquatic Science and
Technology (Eawag), Duebendorf,
Switzerland. ISBN 978-3-906484-57-0.
2. Peña Varón, M., Mara, D. (2004).
Stabilisation ponds (https://www.bvsde.pah
o.org/bvsacd/cd27/ponds.pdf) . IRC
International Water and Sanitation Centre.
Delft, The Netherlands.

3. "Tech Notes Main Page" (http://www.lagoo

nsonline.com/technotes.htm) .
www.lagoonsonline.com. Retrieved
2018-01-19.

4. von Sperling, Marcos (2005). Biological

wastewater treatment in warm climate
regions. Chernicharo, Carlos Augusto de
Lemos. London: IWA.
ISBN 9781843390022. OCLC 62306180 (htt
ps://www.worldcat.org/oclc/62306180) .
5. von Sperling, Marcos (2007). Basic
principles of wastewater treatment (http://
www.iwapublishing.com/open-access-eboo
ks/3567) . London, UK: IWA Publishing.
ISBN 978-1843391623. OCLC 878137398
(https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/87813739
8) .

6. von Sperling, Marcos (2007-03-30). Waste

stabilisation ponds. London.
ISBN 9781843391630. OCLC 878137182 (h
ttps://www.worldcat.org/oclc/87813718
2) .
7. Weaver, L; Webber, J; Karki, N; Thomas, K;
Mackenzie, M; Lin, S; Inglis, A; Williamson,
W (2016). "Optimising wastewater ponds
for effective pathogen removal" (http://ww
w.conferensum.com/files/30204/IWA%20P
onds%20Conference%20-%20DRAFT%20PR
OGRAMME.pdf) (PDF). 11th IWA Specialist
Group Conference on Wastewater Pond
Technology, University of Leeds, March
2016.
8. Verbyla, M., von Sperling, M., Ynoussa, M.
(2017). Waste Stabilization Ponds. In: J.B.
Rose and B. Jiménez-Cisneros, (eds) Global
Water Pathogens Project (http://www.water
pathogens.org) . (C. Haas, J. Mihelcic and
M. Verbyla) (eds). Part 4. Management of
Risk from Excreta and Wastewater (http://w
ww.waterpathogens.org/book/waste-stabili
zation-ponds) ). Michigan State University,
E. Lansing, MI, UNESCO.

9. WHO (2006). WHO Guidelines for the Safe

Use of Wastewater, Excreta and Greywater -
Volume IV: Excreta and greywater use in
agriculture (http://www.susana.org/en/reso
urces/library/details/1004) . World Health
Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland
10. Stewart M. Oakley, Department of Civil
Engineering, California State University: The
Need for Wastewater Treatment in Latin
America: A Case Study of the Use of
Wastewater Stabilization Ponds in
Honduras (http://www.nesc.wvu.edu/nsfc/
Articles/SFQ/SFQ_sp05/SFQ_Sp05_juried.p
df) , Small Flows Quarterly Juried Article,
Spring 2005, Volume 6, Number 2

11. Ramadan, Hamzeh H.; Ponce, Victor M.

"Design and Performance of Waste
Stabilization Ponds" (http://stabilizationpon
ds.sdsu.edu) . San Diego State University.
Retrieved 2016-10-26.
12. Ashworth; Skinner (19 December 2011).
"Waste Stabilisation Pond Design Manual"
(https://www.powerwater.com.au/__data/a
ssets/pdf_file/0008/43946/wsp_design_m
anual.pdf) (PDF). Power and Water
Corporation.

13. USEPA (2011) Principles of Design and

Operations of Wastewater Treatment Pond
Systems for Plant Operators, Engineers,
and Managers (https://www.epa.gov/sites/
production/files/2014-09/documents/lagoo
n-pond-treatment-2011.pdf) . EPA/600/R-
10/088. United States Environmental
Protection Agency
14. Morris, J (2010). "Michigan Department of
Natural Resources" (https://www.michigan.
gov/documents/deq/wrd-ot-lagoon-manual
_426356_7.pdf) (PDF). State of Michigan
Department of Natural Resources.
15. Cincinnati, O. (2010, June 29). NEPIS
document display (http://nepis.epa.gov/Ex
e/ZyNET.exe/P100C8HC.txt?ZyActionD=Zy
Document&Client=EPA&Index=2011%20Thr
u%202015&Docs=&Query=&Time=&EndTim
e=&SearchMethod=1&TocRestrict=n&Toc=
&TocEntry=&QField=&QFieldYear=&QFieldM
onth=&QFieldDay=&UseQField=&IntQFieldO
p=0&ExtQFieldOp=0&XmlQuery=&File=D%3
A%5CZYFILES%5CINDEX%20DATA%5C11T
HRU15%5CTXT%5C00000000%5CP100C8
HC.txt&User=ANONYMOUS&Password=ano
nymous&SortMethod=h%7C-&MaximumDo
cuments=1&FuzzyDegree=0&ImageQuality=
r75g8/r75g8/x150y150g16/i425&Display=
p%7Cf&DefSeekPage=x&SearchBack=ZyAc
tionL&Back=ZyActionS&BackDesc=Result
 s%20page&MaximumPages=1&ZyEntry=4
5) .

16. Chernicharo, C.A.L. (2007). Anaerobic

reactors. Volume 4. Biological Wastewater
Treatment Series (http://www.iwapublishin
g.com/open-access-ebooks/3567) .
London, UK: IWA Publishing. ISBN 978-
1843391623.

17. "Ecologic water basins used for

agriculture/irrigation" (https://web.archive.o
rg/web/20110721014354/http://www.oiea
u.fr/ciedd/contributions/atriob/contributio
n/russian.htm) . Oieau.fr. Archived from the
original (http://www.oieau.fr/ciedd/contribu
tions/atriob/contribution/russian.htm) on
2011-07-21. Retrieved 2010-10-05.
18. SwimPond Incorporated. "reservoirs made
self-purifying through addition of treatment
pond" (https://web.archive.org/web/20110
716172126/http://www.swimpond.com/po
ols_or_ponds.html) . Swimpond.com.
Archived from the original (http://www.swi
mpond.com/pools_or_ponds.html) on
2011-07-16. Retrieved 2010-10-05.

19. von Sperling, Marcos (2016-08-01). Perroni,

Alejandra (ed.). "Urban Wastewater
Treatment in Brazil". doi:10.18235/0000397
(https://doi.org/10.18235%2F0000397) .
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires
|journal= (help)
20. Arthur, J.P. (1983). Notes on the design and
operation of waste stabilization ponds in
warm climates of developing countries.
Technical paper No 7. Washington D.C

External links

Publications on ponds (http://www.susa

na.org/en/knowledge-hub/resources-an
d-publications/library?search=pond) in
the library of the Sustainable Sanitation
Alliance
Stabilization pond pictures: Enter "pond"
into search field of SuSanA photo
database on Flickr (https://www.flickr.co
m/photos/gtzecosan/)
Retrieved from
"https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?
title=Waste_stabilization_pond&oldid=1205518752
"

This page was last edited on 9 February 2024, at

21:10 (UTC). •
Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless
otherwise noted.