MINKONSTRAK ENGINEERING & GEN.

SERVICES
Luga-it, Misamis Oriental
snippingTel. No. (063) 225-1906, Fax No. (063) 222-2513
E-mail Address: minkonstrak@yahoo.com

SAFETY, ENVIRONMENT RISK AND QUALITY RISK ASSESSMENT

Site : Concrete pouring of Silo Team Members: FVS. BALDOMERO, M.ALCOS, J.ATILLO Revision No.:

Location / Department : Approved by : Date Updated:

Holcim Lugait Plant

Note 1: If the relevant control is not in place, the local supervisor must install additional controls (Extra supervision, Tool Box talks, warning signs, PPE, etc) until the appropriate control is in place.

Note 2: This RA should consider human behavior and capabilities of all personnel (employees, contractors, visitors) who have been given an appropriate induction that covers site hazards, use of standard PPE and the site rules and are trained in their resp

Note 3: This RA shall include Routine and non-routine activities: Routine- Company's routine or intended processes/ activities- usually are scheduled and planned(daily activities of equipment, operations and process) ; Non-routine - an extension of company's non routine activities.

Risk
CONTROLS Risk New New
Safety Envi. Quality Rating Respo Due Rating
Hazard Aspect Risk Consequence/Impact Rating
(L, M, contr nsible Date (L, M,
(L, M, H) Elimination Substitution Engineering Administration PPE ols
H) H)

Process/Activity : General Activities

Influence : Direct Indirect

Condition : Normal Abnormal Emergency

Activity : Routine Non-routine

Foundation Works (SeaSide)

1. Processing of permits x L - - - L

assign traffic man during

Moving Vehicles hauling

Dust Wear Proper working

2.Hauling of materials x L - - - goggles and dust mask L

Form Issue: 04/27/2011 Page 1 of 12

 Eye Irritation due to flying
dust

Dust close the area using Wear Proper working

3.Sacking of Aggregates x L - - goggles and dust mask L
hard barricades
hit by moving vehicles

ensure equipments used

sharp edges that may
are tagged and checked
cause hand cuts before using

design the structure

ensure that the winch is Wear Proper working
4. Installation of Winch to the close the area using that will hold the
top of the silo
x Dust L - fastened properly to the goggles and dust mask L
hard barricades winch at the top of the structure
silo
the winch might fall

Eye Irritation due to flying

dust

aware the workers about

the tripping hazards in
Dust the area

Coldworks due to concrete wear proper Working

5. Concrete pouring of one Gloves, dust mask and
silo using 1 bagger and winch
x M - - - L
sharp edges that may working goggles
cause hand cuts

aware the workers about

the tripping hazards in
Dust the area

Coldworks due to concrete wear proper Working

6. Mix the concrete at the Gloves, dust mask and
bottom of the silo
x M - - - L
working goggles
sharp edges that may
cause hand cuts

aware the workers about

the tripping hazards in
Dust the area

Coldworks due to concrete wear proper Working

7. Put the mixed concrete into Gloves, dust mask and
a concrete pale
x M - - - L
working goggles
sharp edges that may
cause hand cuts

Form Issue: 04/27/2011 Page 2 of 12


7. Put the mixed concrete into
a concrete pale
8. Lift the concrete pale using
winch
9. Repeat the process until
the silo top is poured
10. Repeat the process to the 2
silos
11.Housekeeping
Form Issue: 04/27/2011
x M
Dust
x Coldworks due to concrete M -
sharp edges that may
cause hand cuts
Dust
Coldworks due to concrete
x M
sharp edges that may
cause hand cuts
Dust
x M
Coldworks due to concrete
sharp edges that may
cause hand cuts
Dust
x Coldworks due to concrete L -
sharp edges that may
cause hand cuts
wear proper Working
Gloves, dust mask and
- - - L
working goggles
ensure equipments used
are tagged and checked
before using
design the structure
ensure that the winch is Wear Proper working
that will hold the
- fastened properly to the goggles and dust mask L
winch at the top of the structure
silo
aware the workers about
the tripping hazards in
the area
wear proper Working
Gloves, dust mask and
- - - L
working goggles
aware the workers about
the tripping hazards in
the area
wear proper Working
Gloves, dust mask and
- - - L
working goggles
aware the workers about
the tripping hazards in
the area
wear proper Working
- - Gloves, dust mask and L
working goggles
Page 3 of 12
 Quality Risk Management
LIKELIHOOD/ PROBABILITY

ALMOST CERTAIN LIKELY POSSIBLE

IMPACT RATING
Occurs once a
Occurs monthly Occurs quarterly
year

Level A B C
C
Catastrophic H H H
o
5
n
s Major H H H
e 4
q
u Moderate H H M
e 3
n Minor
c M M L
2
e
Insignificant L L L
1

CATEGORY OPERATION

Catastrophic Plant operation disrupted for more than 15 days

Major Plant operation disrupted for 11 - 15 days

Moderate Operation may be disrupted for 5 to 10 days

Minor Operation disrupted for 2 - 4 days

Insignificant Operation disrupted for 1 day

ment
PROBABILITY

UNLIKELY RARE

Occurs between
Occurs once
3 years to 5
every two years
years

D E

H H

M M

M L

L L

L L

ATION

ys
H Safety Risk Assessment Matrix
More than Once or Once in Unlikely to
Once in 5
twice per twice per approx 15 happen in the
Risk Rating year year
years
years operation
A B C D E

Fatality 1 H H H M M

Permanent Disability 2 H H M M L

Lost Time Injury 3 H M M L L

Medical Treatment 4 M M L L L

First Aid Treatment

5 L L L L L
(Minor Impact)

Acceptable level of risk. Monitoring and measurements of associated

GREEN
important Environmental parameters. Effective control measures have
Low Risk (L)
already been established.

Risk level relatively considered acceptable. Action Plans should be

made to reduce the Risk - Develop or review existing document
YELLOW
procedures with defined operating criteria, including training of relevant
Medium Risk (M)
personnel where applicable, monitor and measure associated important
Environmental parameters.

Unacceptable level of risk. Work should not be started or shutdown

operation until the risk has been eliminated or reduced. Action Plans
RED should be made to reduce the Risk - Develop or review existing
High Risk (H) document procedures with defined operating criteria, including training of
relevant personnel where applicable, monitor and measure associated
important Environmental parameters.
85
 Environment Aspect and Impact Assessment Matrix
LIKELIHOOD/ PROBABILITY
NORMAL LEGACY ABNORMAL/ EMERGENCY SI

Impact Rating Occurred in the

Occurs normally Occurred in the
Occurs due to plant between a
upon operation/ plant for the
past activities year ago to 3
activity past 12 months
years ago

Environment Reputation Level F E D C

Catas-trophic
Massive Impact International Effect H H H H
C 5
o
Major
n Major Impact National Effect H H H H
4
s
e Mode-rate
q Local Impact Local Effect M M H M
3
u
e Minor
Minor Impact Limited Effect L L M L
n 2
c Insignificant
e Slight Impact Slight Effect L L L L
1
No Effect
Zero Impact No Effect L L L L
0

RISK-BASED CONTROL PLAN

 GREEN
Acceptable level of risk. Monitoring and measurements of associated important Environmental parameters. Effective control measures h
Low Risk
established.
(L)

YELLOW Risk level relatively considered acceptable. Action Plans should be made to reduce the Risk - Develop or review existing document proce
Medium Risk (M) operating criteria, including training of relevant personnel where applicable, monitor and measure associated important Environmental pa

RED Unacceptable level of risk. Work should not be started or shutdown operation until the risk has been eliminated or reduced. Action Plans
High Risk the Risk - Develop or review existing document procedures with defined operating criteria, including training of relevant personnel where
(H) measure associated important Environmental parameters.
x
BABILITY
RMAL/ EMERGENCY SITUATION

Never occurred 5
Occurred in the
years ago and
plant between 3
beyond or never
years to 5 years
occurred in the
ago
plant

B A

H M

M M

M M

L L

L L

L L
fective control measures have already been

w existing document procedures with defined

mportant Environmental parameters.

d or reduced. Action Plans should be made to reduce

relevant personnel where applicable, monitor and
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT RISK ASSESSMENT

REVISION HISTORY

Reasons for Change Details Date Approved by