Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full download Bioremediation and Bioeconomy 1st Edition Prasad file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download Bioremediation and Bioeconomy 1st Edition Prasad file pdf all chapter on 2024
Edition Prasad
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmass.com/product/bioremediation-and-bioeconomy-1st-edition-prasad/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
https://ebookmass.com/product/liquid-biofuels-fundamentals-
characterization-and-applications-1st-edition-krushna-prasad-
shadangi/
https://ebookmass.com/product/emerging-technologies-in-
environmental-bioremediation-1st-edition-maulin-p-shah/
https://ebookmass.com/product/bioeconomy-and-global-inequalities-
socio-ecological-perspectives-on-biomass-sourcing-and-
production-1st-edition-edition-maria-backhouse/
https://ebookmass.com/product/climate-change-and-soil-
interactions-1st-edition-majeti-narasimha-vara-prasad-editor/
Beginning Spring Boot 3 2nd Edition Siva Prasad Reddy
Katamreddy [K. Siva Prasad Reddy]
https://ebookmass.com/product/beginning-spring-boot-3-2nd-
edition-siva-prasad-reddy-katamreddy-k-siva-prasad-reddy/
https://ebookmass.com/product/algal-green-chemistry-recent-
progress-in-biotechnology-1st-edition-edition-rajesh-prasad-
rastogi/
https://ebookmass.com/product/atlas-of-oral-histology-2nd-
edition-harikrishnan-prasad/
https://ebookmass.com/product/indian-political-system-4th-
edition-mahendra-prasad-singh/
https://ebookmass.com/product/new-and-future-developments-in-
microbial-biotechnology-and-bioengineering-crop-improvement-
through-microbial-biotechnology-1st-edition-ram-prasad/
Bioremediation and
Bioeconomy
Bioremediation and
Bioeconomy
Edited by
M.N.V. Prasad
Department of Plant Sciences
University of Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience broaden
our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical treatment may become
necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating and using
any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such information or methods
they should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including parties for whom they have a
professional responsibility.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors, assume any
liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or
otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas contained in the
material herein.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
ISBN: 978-0-12-802830-8
This book is dedicated to Challapalli Savithri.
Contributors
S.Z. Ahammad
Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India
K. Amulya
Bioengineering & Environmental Sciences; CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology
(CSIR-IICT), Hyderabad, India
D. Annapurna
University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
B. Barbosa
Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Caparica, Portugal
N.S. Bolan
University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
A. Brandys
Institute of Natural Fibres and Medicinal Plants, Poznan, Poland
E.N.V.M. Carrilho
Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Araras, SP, Brazil
R. Chaturvedi
St. John’s College, Agra, India
T.S. Chibrik
Ural Federal University named after First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Ekaterinburg, Russia
J. Costa
Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Caparica, Portugal
Shikha Dahiya
Bioengineering & Environmental Sciences; CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology
(CSIR-IICT), Hyderabad, India
K.C. Das
University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
V. Escande
FRE 3673 – Bioinspired Chemistry and Ecological Innovations, – CNRS, University of Montpellier
2, Stratoz – Cap Alpha, Avenue de l’Europe, 34830 Clapiers, France
P.J.C. Favas
University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal
A.L. Fernando
Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Caparica, Portugal
E.I. Filimonova
Ural Federal University named after First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Ekaterinburg, Russia
xxi
xxii Contributors
Edward Gatliff
Applied Natural Sciences, Inc., Hamilton, Ohio, USA
M.A. Glazyrina
Ural Federal University named after First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Ekaterinburg, Russia
S. Gopalakrishnan
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru,
Telangana, India
C. Grison
FRE 3673 – Bioinspired Chemistry and Ecological Innovations – CNRS, University of Montpellier
2, Stratoz – Cap Alpha, Avenue de l’Europe, 34830 Clapiers, France
U. Jena
Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV, USA
V. Kanaganahalli
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru,
Telangana, India
Srujana Kathi
Pondicherry University, Kalapet, Puducherry, India
J. Koelmel
University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
A. Kumar
Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India
G. Labuto
Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
G. Lemoine
Établissement Public Foncier Nord-Pas de Calais, Euralille, France
P. James Linton
Geosyntec, Clearwater, Florida, USA
N.V. Lukina
Ural Federal University named after First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Ekaterinburg,
Russia
S.K. Maiti
Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India
M.G. Maleva
Ural Federal University named after First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Ekaterinburg,
Russia
O. Meesungnoen
Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham, Thailand
G. Mohanakrishna
VITO—Flemish Institute for Technological Research, Mol, Belgium
Contributors xxiii
R. Naidu
University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
W. Nakbanpote
Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham, Thailand
T.K. Olszewski
Organic Chemistry, Wroclaw University of Technology, Wroclaw
D. Pant
VITO—Flemish Institute for Technological Research, Mol, Belgium
E.G. Papazoglou
Agricultural University of Athens, Athens, Greece
M.S. Paul
St. John’s College, Agra, India
C. Phadermrod
Padaeng Industry Public Co. Ltd. (Mae Sot Office), Tak, Thailand
M.N.V. Prasad
University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, India, and Ural Federal University named after
First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Ekaterinburg, Russia
J. Pratas
University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
M. Rajkumar
Central University of Tamil Nadu, Thiruvarur, Tamil Nadu, India
E.A. Rakov
Ural Federal University named after First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Ekaterinburg,
Russia
P. Srinivas Rao
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru,
Telangana, India
G.A. Ravishankar
Dayananda Sagar Institutions, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Douglas J. Riddle
RELLC, Mountain Center, California, USA
D. Rose
University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
H. Sarma
N N Saikia College, Titabar, Assam, India
A. Sathya
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru,
Telangana, India
xxiv Contributors
K. Schmidt-Przewoźna
Institute of Natural Fibres and Medicinal Plants, Poznan, Poland
A. Sebastian
University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
B. Seshadri
University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
V. Sivasubramanian
Phycospectrum Environmental Research Centre (PERC), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
T.R. Sreekrishnan
Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India
S. Srikanth
VITO—Flemish Institute for Technological Research, Mol, Belgium
S. Suthari
University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
O. Sytar
Kyiv National University of Taras Shevchenko, Kyiv, Ukraine
J.C. Tewari
Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
R. Thangarajan
University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
Paul R. Thomas
Thomas Consultants, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
S. Venkata Mohan
Bioengineering & Environmental Sciences; CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology
(CSIR-IICT), Hyderabad, India
S. Vidyashankar
M/s. DaZiran Health Products, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
H. Wang
Zhejiang A & F University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
A.A. Warra
Kebbi State University of Science and Technology, Aliero, Nigeria
Foreword
Recent years have seen significant worldwide investment in the bioeconomy, in both political and eco-
nomic terms. The bioeconomy encompasses the production of renewable biological resources and their
conversion into food, feed, bio-based products and bioenergy via innovative and efficient technologies
provided by industrial biotechnology. It is already a reality offering great opportunities and solutions to
major societal, environmental and economic challenges, including climate change mitigation, energy
and food security and resource efficiency.
Bioremediation, on the other hand, is a waste management technique that involves the use of or-
ganisms to remove or neutralize pollutants from a contaminated site. Bioremediation provides a tech-
nique for cleaning up pollution by enhancing the natural attenuation, a process that occurs in nature.
Depending on the site and its contaminants, bioremediation may be safer and less expensive than alter-
native solutions such as incineration or landfilling of the contaminated materials.
This book on “Bioremediation and Bioeconomy” has the ambition to address the research gap at
the interface between pollution mitigation and boosting the bio-based economy aiming at sustainable
development. There is pressing need for pollution abatement and there is an even more pressing need to
create viable value chains from contaminated substrates especially in developing economies.
This book will tackle a number of key questions: How can scientific innovations be more efficiently
exploited to achieve bioremediation and bioeconomy? What are the needs of cutting edge environmen-
tal industries for scale-up and large-scale market penetration? What are important research priorities
for industry and policymakers? and How can environmental sustainability be maintained and simulta-
neously economic sustainability be achieved.
The chapters of this book on bioproducts, biomass energy and biofuels, ornamentals and crops from
contaminated substrates, brownfield development, algal bioproducts, bioprocesses and bioengineering,
and on new biology specifically address the interface and synergies between bioremediation and the
bioeconomy and will therefore contribute to turn into reality the promise to create viable value chains
from contaminated substrates in the context of the emerging global bioeconomy.
Dr. Rainer Janssen
WIP Renewable Energies
Head of Unit Biomass Department
München
Germany
xxv
Preface
xxvii
xxviii Preface
I would like to thank all the authors of this volume for their cogent and comprehensive contributions.
I am thankful to Candice Janco, Senior Acquisitions Editor, Environmental Science; Laura Kelleher;
Rowena Prasad; and Marisa LaFleur for excellent coordination of this fascinating project, suggestions;
thanks are due to Mr Paul Prasad Chandramohan, and his team for excellent technical help in many
ways that resulted in record time of publication of this edition.
I am grateful to Dr. Rainer Janssen, WIP Renewable Energies, Head of Unit Biomass Department,
Sylvensteinstr. 2, D-81369 Muenchen, Germany, for preparing the Foreword at short notice.
My profuse thanks to Prof. Dr. Irina Kiseleva, Head, Department of Plant Physiology and
Biochemistry, and all faculty members of the department; Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg,
Russia, for extending help in several ways.
Thanks are due to Dr James Philp (France), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development (OECD), Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry, Paris, and Anonymous re-
viewers from Germany and the United States for constructive comments that enhanced the outlook of
this work.
Last but not least I wish to acknowledge the University of Hyderabad for granting sabbatical leave
that enabled me to concentrate on this work, and the numerous colleagues from overseas, my students,
and research associates for sharing knowledge, ideas, and assistance that helped in developing and
shaping this book.
xxix
CHAPTER
PRODUCTION OF BIODIESEL
FEEDSTOCK FROM
THE TRACE ELEMENT
CONTAMINATED LANDS
1
IN UKRAINE
O. Sytar1, M.N.V. Prasad2
Kyiv National University of Taras Shevchenko, Kyiv, Ukraine1
University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, India2
1 INTRODUCTION
The total area of Ukraine is about 60.37 million ha of which agricultural land is 41.76 million ha.
Ukraine has several rivers and lakes. The prominent crops cultivated for grain production are winter rye,
oats, corn, barley, and buckwheat (in recent years about 15% of the world’s production has come from
Ukraine). Flax, hops, sugar beets, and potatoes are other important crops in Ukraine. Soybean, rape-
seed, and sunflower production has increased in recent years, boosting agro-based economy (Figure 1).
After the Chernobyl accident in 1986, the trace element pollution and contamination in Ukraine
received considerable attention. In total, air pollution-related mortality represents about 6% of total
mortality in Ukraine (Mnatsakanian, 1992; Strukova et al., 2006). In the Donets Basin (48.3°N, 38.0°E)
of eastern Ukraine, there are about 1200 mine-waste dumpsites, mostly from coal mining. These have
accumulated over more than 200 years of mining (Panov et al., 1999). Ore processing and the use of
metal-enriched coal in coal-fired electric generation and home heating have led to widespread con-
tamination of the environment (Panov et al., 1999; Kolker et al., 2009). Of the 26 elements considered
to be pollutants in the Donets Basin, arsenic (As) and mercury (Hg) are of primary concern; most of
the As-polluted soils in this region are near burning-coal waste heaps (Panov et al., 1999; Conko et al.,
2013). For more than 50 years, the largest Hg production facility of the former Soviet Union operated in
Horlivka (Gorlovka, Russian spelling), a city of approximately 300,000 residents in the Donets Basin.
During this period, about 30,000 metric tons of Hg were produced from ore extracted from the adjacent
Mykytivka (Nikitovka) mines.
The contaminated land that is unsuitable for food production and of little or no economic return
could be used for the production of bioenergy. The problem of competition for fertile land can be al-
leviated by using contaminated land for the production of bioenergy plants.
Using biomass for fuel production is an attractive option for three main reasons. First, it is a renew-
able resource and thus its development could be sustained in the future. Second, because there is no net
release of carbon dioxide and sulfur contents are low, it is environmentally attractive. Thirdly, given the
rise in fossil fuel prices, it is also economically advantageous (Demirbas, 2009).
Bioremediation and Bioeconomy. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802830-8.00001-0
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
3
4 CHAPTER 1 TRACE ELEMENT CONTAMINATED LANDS IN UKRAINE
a b
This review chapter presents the nowadays situation of heavy metals pollution on Ukraine territory
and the possibility of using oilseed crops (rapeseed, soybean, and sunflower) for 50% cleanup of the
areas polluted by heavy metals.
FIGURE 2
Probable problem areas of diffuse contamination in Europe (EEA-UNEP, 2000) * - agricultural areas which can
use chemical during plant cultivation.
Second place among heavy metals highly contaminating Ukraine soil is nickel. It’s known
that the main anthropogenic source of nickel emission is combustion of fossil fuels and traffic
(Krstić et al., 2007). Nickel is widely used in silver refineries, alloy, pigments electroplating,
zinc-based casting, and storage batteries too, which also can have the effect of increasing nickel
pollution.
6
CHAPTER 1 TRACE ELEMENT CONTAMINATED LANDS IN UKRAINE
150 km
100 mi
Chemihiv
Volyn
Sumy
Rivne
Zhytomyr
Kyiv
Lviv
Poltava Kharkiv
Ternopil Khmelnytskyi
Cherkasy Luhansk
Ivano-Frankivsk
Vinnytsia
Zakarpattia
Kirovohrad Dnipropetrovsk
Chernivtsi
Donetsk
Mykolaiv Zaporizhia
Odessa
Kherson
SEA OF AZOV
Autonomous Republic
Content of lead on territory of Ukraine of Crimea
The greatest Ni content found in soils of the regions of Zhytomyr, Kyiv, Zaporizhia Donetsk, and
Lugansk (in the soil 25-50 mg/kg when maximal permissible level 50 mg/kg) Figure 2. At these regions
it is possible to get relatively safe crops with tolerance to Ni but in limited quantities. The agricultural
land Volyn, Poltava, Vinnytsia, and partly other regions have pollution levels 5-10 and 10-15 mg/kg of
soil areas for ecological agriculture nowadays. In these areas it is possible to grow vegetable raw mate-
rials suitable for the production of baby food. Soils with the average pollution level of Ni (15-25 mg/kg)
(Figure 2) are mainly distributed in Chernihiv, Sumy, Zaporizhya, Ivano-Frankivsk, Rivne, and
Transcarpathian region (Anonymous, 2004). High level of copper found in Kiev, Chernihiv, Zgytomyr,
Volyn, Zakarpatiya regions. Chernivtsi, Kharkiv, Donetsk and Zaporizhya resgins has been character-
ized high level of chromium (Figure 3). In the Ivano-Frankivsk region, Pb concentrations exceed toxic
levels in the areas close to industrial sectors (10% of the region territory). Local background levels of
heavy metals are greatly exceeded in snow close to industrial regions. Cd and Mo accumulate in forest
soils in the Ukrainian Carpathians region (Shparyk and Parpan, 2004) (Figure 3). A similar situation
has been observed with pollution of soil with Zn and Co. The maximal permissible level of Zn and Co
in air is 300 and 50 Clarke, respectively (Clarke is unit of each element and in soil it is 50 and 8 mg/
kg, respectively). In general, for these three heavy metals (Ni, Zn, and Co) in many areas of Ukrainian
territory their content in the soil is at less than maximal permissible level (Figures 4 and 5).
It’s known that the maximum permissible level of Pb in soil is 30 mg/kg of dry soil (Samokhvalova
et al., 2001). The limits of maximum permissible level depend on the complex of soil and ecological
conditions, among which the most important are soil pH and content of hummus (Glazovskaya,
1994; Kabata-Pendias and Pendias, 1989; Obuhov et al., 1980). It has been proved that the main
quantity of heavy metals is concentrated in the upper layer of arable soil (0-10 cm) (Glazovskaya,
1994; Trahtenberg, 1998). The period of heavy metal removal from soil is near 740 to 5900 years (for
example, cadmium and lead) (Dobrovolsky, 1997). Most inorganic compounds of Pb and Cd are insol-
uble or poorly soluble in water. However, their dissolubility depends on soil pH. Dissolubility reaches
a 4.0, but in the range of 6.5-8.0, dissolubility declines distinctly, but after further increasing of pH,
slightly increases (Glazovskaya, 1994). The redox system, level of gross content, and the granulomet-
ric composition of soil have an influence on solubility of heavy metal compounds in the soil (Lysenko
et al., 2001). Soils serve as a comprehensive geochemical barrier that keeps solid compounds and water-
soluble compounds of heavy metals in the form of organo-mineral, mineral complexes, and compounds
(Glazovskaya, 1994). It is known that soil has a buffer capacity as to toxic effect of pollutants, which
provides for transformation of pollutants at not-soluble forms for plants. Granulometric structure of soil
rich in organic matter and carbonate usually has the highest buffer capacity (Grakovsky et al., 1994).
100 mi
Chemihiv
Volyn
Sumy
Rivne
Zhytomyr
Kyiv
Lviv
Kharkiv
Poltava
Ternopil Khmelnytskyi
Cherkasy Luhansk
Ivano-Frankivsk Vinnytsia
Zakarpattia
Kirovohrad Dnipropetrovsk
Chemivlsi Donetsk
Zaporizhia
Mykolaiv
Odessa
Kherson
SEA OF AZOV
Autonomous Republic
Content of nickel on territiry of Ukraine of Crimea
High level (25-30 mg/kg)
Sevastopol
Average level (15-25 mg/kg) BLACK SEA
Low level (lass than 10 mg/kg)
100 mi
Volyn
Chernihiv
Rivne
Zhytomyr Sumy
Kyiv
Mykolaiv Zaporizhia
Odesa
Kherson
SEA OF AZOV
Autonomous Republic
of Crimea
9
10 CHAPTER 1 TRACE ELEMENT CONTAMINATED LANDS IN UKRAINE
significantly surpassing France (0.3 ha/cap) and Germany (0.1 ha/cap) (FAOSTAT, 2012), for example.
The country’s geographical location as neighbor to the countries of the European Union and its access to
the Black Sea is additionally advantageous to its role as a global supplier of biomass resources. Ukraine is
a major exporter of agricultural primary products: In 2010 and in physical units, it ranked second among
the international top exporters of barley, third among the exporters of rapeseed, seventh for exports of
sunflower seed, and ninth among the exporters of wheat. Rapeseed production and exports drastically
increased from 2004 onwards and grew by a factor of almost 20 until 2008 (FAOSTAT, 2012).
In Ukraine the sunflower, rapeseed, and soybean are the most widespread oilseed crops that can be
used for phytoremediation process and production of biodiesel and biogas. In Eastern Europe, prob-
lems of diffuse soil contamination are greatest in Azerbaijan, Belarus, Moldova, Russia, and Ukraine
(Denisov et al., 1997). In the total cultivation area of these crops in Ukraine, the area of heavy metals-
contaminated soils is approximately 15-20%.
At the same time biofuels are currently not produced or consumed in relevant amounts within Ukraine.
Yet in Ukraine potential is mainly as an alternative to liquid fossil fuel use and not to the use of natural gas
and coal in industrial applications and electricity generation. The production of biofuel requires energy
inputs. But the biggest advantage that biodiesel has over gasoline and petroleum diesel is its environmen-
tal friendliness. Biodiesel burns similar to petroleum diesel as it concerns regulated pollutants. On the
other hand, biodiesel probably has better efficiency than gasoline. One such fuel for compression ignition
engines that exhibits great potential is biodiesel. Diesel fuel can also be replaced by biodiesel made from
vegetable oils. Biodiesel is now mainly being produced from soybean, rapeseed, and palm oils.
The higher heating values (HHVs) of biodiesels are relatively high. The HHVs of biodiesels
(39-41 MJ/kg) are slightly lower than that of gasoline (46 MJ/kg), petrol diesel (43 MJ/kg), or petro-
leum (42 MJ/kg), but higher than coal (32-37 MJ/kg). Biodiesel has over double the price of petrol die-
sel (Demirbas, 2007). The major economic factor to consider for input costs of biodiesel production is
the feedstock, which is about 80% of the total operating cost. The high price of biodiesel is in large part
due to the high price of the feedstock. Economic benefits of a biodiesel industry would include value
added to the feedstock, an increased number of rural manufacturing jobs, increased income taxes, and
investments in plant and equipment.
The production and utilization of biodiesel is facilitated first through the agricultural policy of sub-
sidizing the cultivation of nonfood crops (rapeseed, for example). Second, biodiesel is exempt from the
oil tax. The European Union in 2005 got nearly 89% of all biodiesel production worldwide. Germany
produced 1.9 billion liters or more than half the world total. In Germany biodiesel is also sold at a lower
price than fossil diesel fuel. Biodiesel is treated like any other vehicle fuel in the UK. Other coun-
tries with significant biodiesel markets included France, the United States, Italy, and Brazil. All other
countries combined accounted for only 11% of world biodiesel consumption. By 2004, the United
States is expected to become the world's largest single biodiesel market, accounting for roughly 18%
of world biodiesel consumption, followed by Germany (EBB, 2004). For Ukraine with its very low
share of renewables in TPES, the promise of reduced environmental burdens is especially appealing
(Schaffartzik et al., 2014).
Rapeseed, as an important feedstock for biofuel, contributed only about 2% to the agricultural
Ukrainian harvest in 2008 but wheat, maize, sugar beets, and sunflower seeds (all also potential feedstock
for biofuel production) figured much more prominently. Yet, while overall agricultural production de-
creased, rapeseed production grew by factor 65 between 1993 and 2008. Almost all of this production is
designated for export. In 2008, 83% of Ukraine's direct material input of rapeseed was exported. In 2009,
this share reached 99% (calculations by the authors based on data extracted from FAOSTAT (2012)).
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
The Project Gutenberg eBook of Nick Carter Stories
No. 158, September 18, 1915: The blue veil; or, Nick
Carter's torn trail
This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States
and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
ebook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where
you are located before using this eBook.
Title: Nick Carter Stories No. 158, September 18, 1915: The blue veil;
or, Nick Carter's torn trail
Language: English
REMARKABLE TRICKERY.
Nick Carter evidently was the man George Vandyke was seeking. He
appeared unable to speak for a moment, nevertheless, so great was his
suppressed excitement.
“I’ve been looking for you,” he finally gasped, when Nick seized him by
the arm and shook him. “They told me you were here. I——”
“Out with it!” repeated Nick more sharply. “What’s the trouble?”
“Clayton has disappeared,” choked Vandyke. “He cannot be found. His
bride also is missing. Neither of them are in their rooms, nor——”
“Good God! Has the blow fallen?”
Mr. Langham staggered as if he had, indeed, received a brutal blow.
Nick Carter immediately took the ribbons.
“Don’t create a stir!” he commanded quickly. “Leave me to look into the
matter. Since both are missing, they may have departed together, bent upon
eluding their very zealous friends and a deluge of confetti.”
“That cannot be, Nick,” Vandyke hurriedly protested. “Clayton’s suit case
is still in his room. He would have taken it with him, of course, if he——”
“Leave it to me. Don’t alarm the guests needlessly.”
“But some of them already know——”
Nick did not wait for more. He brushed by the two men, and, outwardly
perfectly calm, hastened through the crowded hall toward the main stairway.
Both Chick Carter and Patsy Garvan then were on the main floor of the
vast house, the former near the open front door, where, both in the hall and
on the granite steps and the broad veranda outside, scores of guests had
gathered to speed the happy couple on their wedding journey.
Chick saw Nick approaching and caught the ominous gleam in his
expressive eyes.
“What’s up?” he asked quietly, hastily meeting him.
Nick now said what he really thought.
“That devil has got in his work again.”
“Not Margate?”
“I fear so. Both bride and groom are missing.”
“The deuce you say!”
“Nothing could have been pulled off, however, under the eyes of this mob
on the steps and veranda. Slip around to the side door and see what you can
learn,” Nick hurriedly directed. “Keep your eyes open and nail any one
acting suspiciously. Get word to Patsy and send him to the rear door. The
trick may not have been turned yet. They can have been missing only a few
minutes.”
“I’m wise,” Chick nodded, starting for the side hall and the broad exit
under the massive porte-cochère.
Nick hastened to the second floor and toward the two rear rooms used by
the bride and groom that evening, those in front having been needed to
accommodate the throng of guests.
Nick discovered a solitary bridesmaid near the door of Clara’s room, and
somewhat apart from the group of women then near the stairs. She happened
to be one with whom he was acquainted, and he hurriedly approached her.
“What’s this I hear, Miss Arden?” he said quietly. “What do you know
about it?”
“Little enough, Mr. Carter,” she replied, pale and mystified. “I only know
that Clara sent us all from her room after she was dressed for her journey.
She explained that her father wanted to see her privately before she left, and
that she was momentarily expecting him. We left her alone, therefore, and
went downstairs.”
“You mean yourself and the other bridesmaids?”
“Yes, sir.”
“How long ago was that?”
“Not more than ten minutes; hardly as long, I think.”
“Who discovered her absence?”
“I did. I returned to get my handkerchief, which I had left in the room. I
found the room deserted. Clara had gone, but her suit case and hand bag still
are there. I came out, of course, and I at once saw Mr. Vandyke coming up
the side stairs. I told him about it, Mr. Carter, and he said that Clara probably
was with Mr. Clayton in his room. He knocked, but received no answer. He
then went in and found that Mr. Clayton also was missing.”
“Did you make any inquiries among the guests here in the hall?”
“Yes, immediately. We could find no one who had seen either of them go
out. Strange though it seems, both of them have mysteriously disappeared,
leaving their luggage in their rooms.”
“You say that Miss Langham, or, rather, Mrs. Clayton, was clad in her
outside garments?”
“Yes, sir. She had on her hat, veil, and jacket, and was ready to leave at
any moment.”
“What is her traveling costume?”
“A navy-blue suit with hat and veil to match.”
“Who, now, is in her room?”
“No one, Mr. Carter. She——”
“Wait!” Nick interrupted. “I will look in there.”
He stepped into the room while speaking. It was in considerable disorder
after the change of attire from a wedding gown to a traveling costume. There
was no sign of the missing girl, no written line explaining her sudden
departure, no evidence of when, why, or how she had gone. Both windows
were open, but in each there was a wire screen secured on the inside. Nick
saw plainly that neither of them had been tampered with.
“By Jove, this looks bad enough. It looks, indeed, as if Dave Margate has
again got in his work,” he said to himself while retracing his steps. “Has the
rascal designs upon this girl, disregarding the valuable gifts now in the
house? Those were safely guarded from every side, but who would have
thought it necessary to guard her in such a throng as this?”
“What do you think about it, Mr. Carter?” questioned Miss Arden, awed
by the more serious expression on the detective’s face when he came from
the room.
“I cannot say at present,” Nick replied. “Don’t be alarmed, nor spread the
news too quickly. There still is a possibility that they will return.”
He did not wait for an answer, but hastened into an opposite room, that
occupied by Chester Clayton.
There Nick found, at first, the same negative conditions. A single window
overlooked the rear grounds. It was closed and locked. Clayton’s suit case
stood near the door. His overcoat and hat were missing, however, though a
pair of new kid gloves lay on the dressing stand.
Nick had only time to note these features of the scene when Vandyke
hurriedly entered, looking even more pale and disturbed.
“Why did you apprehend so quickly that something was wrong?” Nick
asked a bit abruptly, turning to him.
“Only because Clayton appeared to fear some mishap,” Vandyke replied.
“He admitted he had no definite reason for it, but he seemed very nervous.”
“Where were you when he left? You were his best man.”
“True. I came here to tell you about that.”
“About what?”
“One of the caterer’s assistants came in here a short time ago, not more
than twenty minutes, and stated that Mr. Lenaire wanted to see me in the
dining room.”
“Lenaire is the caterer?”
“Yes. It was upon my recommendation that he was given this job. I asked
Clayton if he had any immediate use for me, and he told me to go ahead and
see what Lenaire wanted. I did so and found him in the dining room.”
“What did he want?”
“He wanted to thank me again for having recommended him, and also to
ask me to express his gratitude to Clayton for having seconded my
suggestion, which he feared he would not have an opportunity to do
personally before Clayton departed. He explained at some length, Nick, and
when I returned I found that Clayton was missing. Then, when unable to find
Clara, I feared something was wrong.”
“I see,” Nick nodded. “Did the waiter who came up return to the dining
room with you?”
“No, not with me,” said Vandyke. “I hurried down ahead of him. I did not
see him again.”
“Do you know his name?”
“I think Lenaire called him Toulon.”
“By Jove, I think I scent the rat in the meal,” Nick muttered. “Have you
looked in the closet, Vandyke?”
“Not yet. Who would expect to find Clayton in the closet, or concealed in
any part of the room? It would be absurd to suppose anything of the kind
——”
“Not absurd to me,” Nick suddenly interrupted. “See for yourself.”
He had, while Vandyke was speaking, looked hurriedly into the wardrobe
closet and under the bed. A broad, old-fashioned couch near one of the walls
then claimed his attention. It was draped with a valance, which he quickly
raised, and then he found what he was seeking.
Flat on his back under the couch lay the senseless form of Chester
Clayton, his eyes closed and his white face upturned, as ghastly as if the
hand of death had been laid upon him.
Vandyke recoiled with a shudder.
“Good heavens!” he cried. “Is he dead? Is he dead, Mr. Carter?”
“Quiet,” Nick cautioned. “No, not dead. The rascal who did this job
doesn’t thrust his knavish neck into a noose. Clayton has been drugged. It’s
the work of the same miscreant who downed him at the time of the jewel
robbery.”
“David Margate?”
“Yes.”
“What shall we——”
“Don’t stop to question,” Nick interrupted. “Lend me a hand and we will
place him on the couch. Slip out and find a physician, if there is one among
the guests. Don’t alarm them, however, by stating what has occurred. A
physician soon can revive him. Send Mr. Langham in here, but not a word
about this to Mrs. Julia Clayton. Leave me to inform her.”
“You think——”
“Never mind what I think,” Nick again cut in while they placed the
senseless man on the couch. “Do what I have directed.”
“But Clara, his wife—what of her?”
“There’s nothing to it, Vandyke,” said the detective. “It’s as plain as twice
two. The bride has been stolen.”
CHAPTER III.