Form:

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY NITW/AC/PhD4

WARANGAL

PROGRESS REVIEW
Part – I
(To be filled by the Research Scholar)
Section A: Details of Registration

1. Name of the Scholar

2. Roll Number

3. Department

4. Date of Registration

Full Time (Institute Scholarship / Project / Other

Category fellowship / Sponsorship / UGC / CSIR / QIP)
5. (strike out whichever not applicable) Part Time (External / Staff)
Others (Specify)
6. Name of the Supervisor
Name of the Co-Supervisor
7.
(if any)
Broad Area of Research
8.
(as decided in the 1st DSC meeting)

Section B: Progress Review

Previous Semester review date and progress

9.
(milestone) achieved as on that date.
Excellent / Very Good / Good / Satisfactory / Poor
10. Previous comments/suggestions from DSC Suggestions (if any):

Identification of research problem

Yes No
through literature survey
Status of the first research paper Not
Submitted
Under
Accepted Published
(journal) submitted Submitted Revision
Current
status of Status of the second research paper Not
Submitted
Under
Accepted Published
(journal) submitted Submitted Revision
11. research
(Tick an Number of papers accepted / Accepted Published
appropriate) published in SCI/SCIE/ABDC
journals
No of Patents Filed Granted

Plan for next

12. Attach separate sheet with the approval of DSC
six Months

1
Milestones Achieved:

Milestone
Stages
Description Date
1. Successful completion of course work (Grade in each course > 7.0)

2. Successful completion of comprehensive examination

3. Publication/Acceptance of 1st SCI/SCIE/ABDC Journal paper

4. Publication/Acceptance of 2nd SCI/SCIE/ABDC Journal paper

5. Tentative date of Submission of Synopsis

Attach supporting documents for the above milestones only at the time of first claim

Name of the Scholar Signature Date

2
 Part – II

(To be filled by the Research Supervisor(s) & Doctoral Scrutiny Committee)

1. Comments of the Supervisor(s) and DSC

Progress Rating Excellent / Very Good / Good / Satisfactory / Marginal / Poor

Comments on the Research Progress:
(specify any particular lacuna if progress is marginal or poor)

2. Milestones achieved so far by the Research Scholar

(Tick all applicable milestones as mentioned above)
1 2 3 4 5

Extension for next semester

Scholarship Enhancement (to be recommended only after
Recommendation (tick if (to be recommended only after completion of three years preferably with
applicable): completion of two years) proof of communication of at least one
manuscript to journal)

Sl. No. DSC Name Signature

1. Chairman (DSC)

2. DSC Member

3. DSC Member

4. DSC Member

5. Supervisor

6. Co-Supervisor (if any)

Part – III
3
 (To be signed by the Research Scholar)

I have noted the comments / suggestions given by the guide and the Doctoral Scrutiny Committee.

Signature of the Research Scholar with Date

Chairman (DSC) Forwarded by the HoD

Date Head of the Department

Copy to:

1. Academic Section - PhD

2. Chairman, Doctoral Scrutiny Committee
3. HoD
4. Research Supervisor(s)
5. Research Scholar

Note:
- Progress Review shall be submitted at the end of every semester until the submission
of Synopsis.
- Do not attach any proof of publications with the progress review form. However, they
shall be submitted only at the time of synopsis.