Post child arrearage hearing

Contest college expenses bases on CT Gen. Stat dated 2011.

Educational support order are not applicable to our case. Ours was a private agreement
written Into our divorce decree. Education support order Sec. 46b-56c only applicable when
one party motions or petitions the court for for educational support.

P
COLLEGE PAYMENT NOT BASED ON ANYTHING OTHHER THA 50% (not grades, not gif he
agrees with school not nothing)

Health insurance prisms considered health care expense

SEPT 16, 2008 AGREEMENT PAG1 1 STATE 25% OF UNREIMBURSED HEALTH
CARE EXPENSES. NOT MEDICAL EXXPENSES BUT HEALTHH CARE
Show error in child support deduction from support services payment sheet

Predictable, Recurring Costs above $ 250 per child per year - Unreimbursed health care
expenses in excess of $ 250 per child per year are excluded from the child support schedules.
If such expenses are predictable and recurring, they should be added to the basic support
amount using Line 11. The court should consider the duration and recurring nature of
unreimbursed health care expenses prior to adding them to the basic support amount. If both
parents provide predictable, recurring unreimbursed health care for the child, the cost to
each parent should be added together to determine the total unreimbursed health care costs.
Each parent's direct health care expenses for the child above the $ 250 per child annual
threshold are credited against this or her share of the total support award on Line 18.
Unpredictable, Non-Recurring Costs above $ 250 per child per year - Healthcare expenses
for a child that exceed $ 250 per child per year that are not predictable and recurring
should be shared between the parents in proportion to their relative incomes as incurred.
“Since these expenses are not included in the support award, the procedure for sharing
such costs should be set forth
in the general language of the order or judgment. “
Agreement states I pay thru my work. Since I no longer work for company( this is an
unpredictable situation) I pay on my own. This expense as stated above are not included in
support award and should be in set forth in support order. Just because my attorney did not
include in order it should not be discounted. Equally share the cost.

“Extraordinary expenses for a child that are not predictable and recurring should be shared
between the parents in proportion to their relative incomes as incurred. Since
these expenses are not included in the support award, the procedure for sharing such costs
should be set forth in the general language of the order or judgment.
Each parent's direct spending on court-approved extraordinary expenses for the child are
credited against his or her share of the total support award on
Line 19. “
Quotes are taken from child support guidelines and instructions

“Line 17 - Credit for Payment of Child's Health Insurance Cost

Enter the non-custodial parent's direct payments (or payroll deductions) toward the marginal
cost of adding the child to a health insurance policy in the Line 17 NCP column.
NOTE: payments cannot exceed the parent's cost of health insurance for the child added on
Line 10. “

Line 17 - Credit for Payment of Child's Health Insurance Cost

Enter the non-custodial parent's direct payments (or payroll deductions) toward the marginal
cost of adding the child to a health insurance policy in the Line 17 NCP column.
NOTE: payments cannot exceed the parent's cost of health insurance for the child added on
Line 10.

Line 17 - Credit for Payment of Child's Health Insurance Cost

Enter the non-custodial parent's direct payments (or payroll deductions) toward the marginal
cost of adding the child to a health insurance policy in the Line 17 NCP column.
NOTE: payments cannot exceed the parent's cost of health insurance for the child added on
Line 10.
Line 17 - Credit for Payment of Child's Health Insurance Cost
Enter the non-custodial parent's direct payments (or payroll deductions) toward the marginal
cost of adding the child to a health insurance policy in the Line 17 NCP column.
NOTE: payments cannot exceed the parent's cost of health insurance for the child added on
Line 10.

SPECIAL RULE. WHHEN THER IS NO CURRENT CHILD SUPPORT ORDER HHE OES 100%
CT CHHILD SUPPORT AND ARREArage guidelines 2015 46b-215a-3a.
1(d) special rule if there is no current support order

SEE PG 20
(3) Special rules for low-income obligors
● (A) Definition of “low-income obligor”
For the purposes of this subdivision only, the term “low-income obligor”

shall include those obligors whose net disposable income (amount on line 23 of the
worksheet) is within the darker shaded area of the schedule.

● (B) Child care contribution limits

○ (i) If the custodial parent’s net disposable income (amount on line 23 of the
worksheet) is within the darker shaded area of the schedule, the child care
contribution of the low- income obligor shall equal the lesser of the noncustodial
parent’s line 25 percentage or fifty percent of the qualifying child care costs.
 Enter the correct percentage, or the corresponding dollar amount in conjunction
with a finding of noncompliance, on line 34 of the worksheet.

○ (ii) If the custodial parent’s net disposable income (amount on line 23 of the
worksheet) is outside the darker shaded area of the schedule, the child care
contribution of the low- income obligor, to be entered on line 34 of the
worksheet, shall equal:
◆ (I) twenty percent of the qualifying child care costs, in lieu of the amount
provided in subdivision (2)(B)(i) of this subsection; or

◆ (II) where there is a finding of noncompliance with a prior child care

contribution, a weekly dollar amount equal to twenty percent of the
estimated average qualifying child care costs, in lieu of the amount provided
in subdivision (2)(B)(ii) of this subsection.

20
46b-215a-3a. Arrearage guidelines
● (a) Scope of section
This section shall be used to determine periodic payments on child support
arrearages, subject to section 46b-215a-5c of the Regulations of Connecticut State
Agencies. The determination of lump sum payments remains subject to the discretion
of the judge or family support magistrate, in accordance with existing law.

● (b) General rule

○ (1) Except as provided in subsections (c), (d) and (e) of this section, the weekly
arrearage payment shall equal the lesser of:
◆ (A) twenty percent of the weekly current support order, or

◆ (B) fifty-five percent of the obligor's net income, reduced by the amount of
the current support order.

○ (2) In a Title IV-D case where arrearages are owing to both the state and a
custodial parent, one payment order shall enter under which payments shall be
distributed in accordance with Title IV-D distribution requirements. Such order
shall be payable to the custodial parent until the custodial parent’s arrearage is
satisfied, and then to the state.

● (c) Special rule for low-income obligors

Subject to subsection (e)(1) of this section, the weekly arrearage payment
of a low-income obligor shall equal the greater of:
○ (1) ten percent of the weekly current support order, or
 ○ (2) one dollar per week.

● (d) Special rule if there is no current support order

Subject to subsection (e)(1) of this section, the weekly arrearage payment
when there is no current support order in effect for any child of the parties
shall equal:
○ (1) twenty percent of an imputed support obligation for the child for whom the
arrearage is owed if the parents have a present duty to provide support for the
child, or

○ (2) one hundred percent of an imputed support obligation for the individual for
whom the arrearage is owed if the parents have no present duty to provide
support for the individual.

● (e) Special rule for child living with the obligor

(1) Applicability
This subsection applies when the child for whom the arrearage is owed is living with the
obligor. If this subsection applies, subsections (c) and (d) of this section shall not be used to
determine the arrearage payment. For the purposes of this subsection, a child is deemed to
be living with the obligor if the circumstances in either subparagraph (A) or subparagraph (B)
of this subdivision are found.
● (A) The obligor is the child's legal guardian and is currently living in the same
household with such child.

● (B) The obligor is not the child's legal guardian, but the child has lived in the same
household with the obligor for at least:

(i) the six months immediately preceding the determination of the arrearage
payment, or 21
(ii) six of the twelve months immediately preceding such determination. (2) Special
rule
When this subsection applies, the weekly arrearage payment shall be:
● (A) one dollar per week if the obligor's gross income is less than or equal to two
hundred fifty percent of the poverty guideline for the obligor's household size, as
published annually in the Federal Register by the Department of Health and Human
Services; or

● (B) twenty percent of the imputed support obligation for such child if the obligor's
gross income is greater than two hundred fifty percent of the poverty guideline for
the obligor's household size, as published annually in the Federal Register by the
Department of Health and Human Services.
(f) Use of the worksheet in arrearage determinations
Line references throughout this subsection are to the worksheet included in section 46b-
215a-6 of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies, which worksheet is intended for use
with the following instructions.
● (1) Determine the total arrearage
Add all amounts described in subparagraphs (A), (B) and (C) of this subdivision to
determine the total arrearage to be paid for past support of the subject child. Enter
the sum on line 32, indicating separately, if applicable, amounts due to the state and
amounts due to the family.
Amounts comprising the total arrearage are:
0 (A) the total of all delinquent amounts that have become due and payable under
a current support order, but which have not been reduced to a judgment or an
arrearage finding;

○ (B) the total of all unpaid support amounts that have been reduced previously to
a judgment or arrearage finding; and

○ (C) the total of all support amounts due for periods prior to the initial
determination of a support order.

● (2) Determine the arrearage payment

Enter on line 29 either twenty percent of the line 30 amount or, if applicable, the
amount determined in one of subparagraphs (A) to (D), inclusive, of this subdivision
(corresponding to paragraphs A to D, inclusive, in section VI of the worksheet). The
line 29 amount is the presumptive arrearage payment. Enter this amount on line 31
unless a deviation criterion applies. If the amount entered on line 31 differs from the
line 29 amount, complete section VIII of the worksheet.
0 (A) If the noncustodial parent is a low-income obligor, enter on line 29 the
greater of ten percent of the line 30 amount or $1 per week, unless
subparagraph (B) of this subdivision applies.

○ (B) If the child is living with the obligor, enter on line 29 either: (i) $1 per week if
the obligor’s gross income is less than or equal to two hundred fifty percent of
poverty level for the obligor's household size, or (ii) twenty percent of an
imputed support obligation for the child if the obligor’s gross income is greater
than two hundred fifty percent of poverty level for the obligor's household size.

○ (C) If there is no current support order and subparagraph (B) of this subdivision
does not apply, enter on line 29 either: (i) twenty percent of an imputed support
obligation if the parents have a present duty to provide support for the child, or
(ii) one hundred percent of an imputed support obligation if the parents have no
present duty to provide support for the individual.
22
(D) If subparagraphs (A) to (C), inclusive, of this subdivision do not apply and the sum of the
current support and arrearage payments would exceed fifty-five percent of the noncustodial
parent’s line 14 amount, enter fifty-five percent of the noncustodial parent’s line 14 amount,
minus the line 30 amount, on line 29. Section 46b-215a-4b. Total presumptive child support
award as a percentage of the obligor’s net income
This section shall be used to determine if the total presumptive child support award as
calculated in accordance with sections 46b-215a-1 to 46b-215a-3a, inclusive, of the
Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies exceeds fifty-five percent of the obligor’s net
weekly income.
● (1) Enter the amounts from lines 30, 31, 33a, 34a and 34b in the Total Child Support
Award Calculation box in section VII of the worksheet.

RE UNPAID SUPPORT DEF. THHHE MISTAKE FOUNF=D IN PAYMENTS FROM

SUPPORT SERVICES DEFENDANT NEVER OFFICALLY CLOSED CHILD
SUPPORT CASE.SO FILE A MOTION FOR MODIFICATION

Def never took out required life insurance

10/20/20 DEF. STATES NEVER GIVEN ANY DOCUMENTATION RE EXPENSES LIAR

Support based on 2008 financials

Now based on 2020
Must pay 100% of payments because no order in effect

25% BASED ON PAYCHECK SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION VERIFICATION IS

ONGOING (FIND IN CT CHILD SUPPORT RULES HERE HHE WAS SUPPOSE TO
TELL COURT IF HE EARNS MORE.. IN AGREEMENT STATE BASED ON
VERIFICATION OF PAY CHHECK STUB “SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION, INCLUDING ANY AND ALL
PAY CHHECK STUBS AND COMMISSION. CHECKS. IT GOES ON TO STATE SUCH VERIFICATION
PROVIDED BY OCT 1, 2008.

IT DOES DOT STATE VERIFCATION SHOULD END. THHIS IS WHHERE YOU NEED TO FIND CT
RULE SHOWING IF DEFENDANTS ICOME INCREASES HE MUST NOTIFY COURT.
I CAN HOLD HIM IN CONTEMPT FOR NOT NOTIFYING COURT.

File production of documents ask for tax return AND PAY CHHECK STUB
RE EDUCATION EXP. FAMINLY LAW TITLE 46b /SEE CT GEN STAT CHAP 815J SEC. 46b-65c

FILL OUT FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIDTE.

I MADE AN ERROR ON ARREARAGES SHOULD BE $13,000. I MISTAKENLY DOIVIDED THEM IN

HHALF

2008 supposed paid update only because it was deducted from $30,000. I gave him as equity
on family home.

GE STOCK TRANSFER

Civil Procedure: Jurisdiction: Personal Jurisdiction & In Rem Actions: In Personam

Actions: General Overview
Unpublished decision: Where a husband had an opportunity to invoke a motion to
dismiss an order to show cause and motion for an order regarding child support,
but instead sat on his right to do so for in excess of the 30-day period under Conn.
Prac. Book § 10-30, his motion to dismiss filed thereafter on grounds of a Conn.
Gen. Stat. § 46b-212d lack of personal and subject matter jurisdiction was denied.
v. 2004 Conn. Super. LEXIS
3770 (Conn. Super. Ct. Dec. 23, 2004). Civil Procedure: Pleading & Practice: Motion
Practice: Time Limitations
Unpublished decision: Where a husband had an opportunity to invoke a motion to
dismiss an order to show cause and motion for an order regarding child support,
but instead sat on his right to do so for in excess of the 30-day period under Conn.
Prac. Book § 10-30, his motion to dismiss filed thereafter on grounds of a lack of
personal and subject matter jurisdiction was denied. v. 2004 Conn. Super. LEXIS
3770 (Conn. Super. Ct. Dec. 23, 2004).
Family Law: Child Support: Obligations: Enforcement: Interstate Enforcement:
Uniform Interstate Family Support Act
Unpublished decision: Under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, the state
of Connecticut did not have jurisdiction for an order of support over the putative
father who, at all relevant times, resided in Florida; accordingly, to the extent that
the mother sought an order of educational support, the putative father’s motion to
dismiss was granted. Mulvehill v. Pope, 2006 Conn. Super. LEXIS 1251 (Conn.
Super. Ct. Apr. 28, 2006).