Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full download Deploying Wireless Sensor Networks. Theory and Practice 1st Edition Mustapha Reda Senouci file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download Deploying Wireless Sensor Networks. Theory and Practice 1st Edition Mustapha Reda Senouci file pdf all chapter on 2024
https://ebookmass.com/product/randomly-deployed-wireless-sensor-
networks-1st-edition-xi-chen/
https://ebookmass.com/product/malware-diffusion-models-for-
wireless-complex-networks-theory-and-applications-1st-edition-
karyotis/
https://ebookmass.com/product/security-in-wireless-communication-
networks-yi-qian/
https://ebookmass.com/product/federated-learning-for-future-
intelligent-wireless-networks-yao-sun/
Artificial Intelligence and Quantum Computing for
Advanced Wireless Networks Savo G. Glisic
https://ebookmass.com/product/artificial-intelligence-and-
quantum-computing-for-advanced-wireless-networks-savo-g-glisic/
https://ebookmass.com/product/bayesian-optimization-theory-and-
practice-using-python-1st-edition-peng-liu/
https://ebookmass.com/product/theory-and-practice-of-physical-
pharmacy-1st-edition-gaurav-jain/
https://ebookmass.com/product/auditing-theory-and-practice-team-
ira-1st-edition-mike-pratt/
https://ebookmass.com/product/discover-digital-libraries-theory-
and-practice-1st-edition-iris-xie/
Deploying Wireless Sensor Networks
Sensor Networks Set
coordinated by
Abdelhamid Mellouk
Deploying Wireless
Sensor Networks
Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as
permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, this publication may only be reproduced,
stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with the prior permission in writing of the publishers,
or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms and licenses issued by the
CLA. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside these terms should be sent to the publishers at the
undermentioned address:
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience
broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical treatment
may become necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating and
using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such information
or methods they should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including parties for
whom they have a professional responsibility.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors, assume any
liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence
or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas contained in
the material herein.
The last two decades of the 20th Century have been driven by the
emergence and evolution of many types of networks and there is no doubt that
in the 21st Century the concept of the Internet of Things (IoT) and its
applications will have a key role in the way we understand our society. The
IoT describes the trend for environments, buildings, vehicles, clothing,
portable devices and other objects to have a digital representation and the
ability to sense, use or exchange information. IoT makes things more
interesting by connecting real-world objects, places and people through the
digital world. Small objects connected through the IoT are today considered
to be one of the main challenges for the business revolution in the coming
years. A widespread use of such connected objects will undoubtedly influence
people, societies and businesses.
key emerging applications and services and the currently deployed network
infrastructures.
One of the most promising technologies within the IoT today consists of
sensor networks. It will be fascinating to look back in the years ahead and
note the growing interest in the use of sensor networks in real-world
applications. In fact, these kinds of networks represent an efficient technology
to monitor and collect specific characteristics in any environment. Several
applications have already been envisioned, in a wide range of areas such as
military, commercial, emergency, biology and health care applications. A
sensor is a physical component able to accomplish three tasks: identify a
physical quantity, treat any such information and transmit this information to
a sink. In most practical applications, sensors do not change their locations
once they are deployed on the sensing field. One of the critical and important
aspects in the success of the use of these networks in real-life applications is
correlated to the deployment of sensors.
This book is a start, but also leaves many questions unanswered. We hope
that it will inspire a new generation of researchers.
The authors hope you will enjoy reading this book and hope to provide the
readers with many helpful ideas and overviews for your own study.
At the end of each chapter, practical issues that need further research are
discussed. In summary, this book discusses both theoretical and practical
aspects and provides guidelines for effective deployment of WSNs.
1
! "
The Arduino UNO has 14 digital input/output pins and six analog input
pins. The architecture of the Arduino board exposes these pins so they can be
connected to external circuits easily. The sensor board can support many
sensors types and communications modules. In Figure 1.1, the sensor node
includes a digital motion detector (PIR Parallax 555-28027 sensor), an
analogue motion detector (PIR Phidgets 1111_0 sensor), a camera module, an
IEEE 802.15.4 radio module (XBee module), and a battery. It should be noted
that the sensor node presented above is more educational than professional,
and it will be used in the next chapters to deploy a surveillance WSN. For
professional applications, besides application-specific solutions,
high-performance sensor nodes such as Stargate and Imote2 [MOO 10] might
be employed. We will discuss various WSNs architectures and models.
Before that, we first introduce the concept of sensor coverage and sensor
communication models in the following sections.
Wireless Sensor Networks 3
Because of its simplicity, the binary coverage model has been widely used
[WAN 10a]. In this model, sensors are modeled as having a predetermined
range of effectiveness. Coverage within the range, which is typically
characterized by a disk (but can also be any arbitrary shape or a collection of
shapes), is assumed to be effective and coverage outside of the given range is
assumed to be non-effective. A well-known variant of the binary model is the
disk model, wherein the sensing area of a sensor is often modeled as a disk
with radius R s (sensing range) centered at the sensor’s location. For an event
that occurs at p, the following equation calculates the probability of detection
of that event by a sensor s:
⎧
⎪
⎪
⎨1 if ||sp|| ≤ R s
P s/p =⎪
⎪ [1.1]
⎩0 otherwise
When using the binary model, several WSN problems (e.g. the coverage
problem) are mapped to geometric problems, which simplify the analysis.
However, the binary model does not consider the stochastic nature of sensing
which could cause erroneous estimation of system performance in the real
world. For that, many recent research works use probabilistic coverage
models to capture the stochastic nature of sensing. An example of a
probabilistic coverage model is given by:
C
P s/p = [1.2]
||sp||γ
where α and β are constants, and Ru is called the uncertain range. Figure 1.3
shows the coverage measure as a function of the sensor-point distance for the
above-mentioned coverage models.
1.4
Binary model
0.06
Probabilistic model ||sp||0.6
1.2 Truncated probabilistic model e−2||sp||
1
coverage measure
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
sensor–point distance
In the evidence-based coverage model [SEN 12c], two states are required
to specify whether a space point p ∈ RoI is covered: θ0 (not covered) and
θ1 (covered). Thus, the frame of discernment (FoD) is the set Θ = {θ0 , θ1 }.
Each sensor s provides information on the coverage of a space point p ∈ RoI
with a belief xs/p . The complementary information 1 − xs/p is assigned to the
whole FoD because it encodes the sensor ignorance. The output from the
sensor s about a space point p ∈ RoI can thus be represented as a basic belief
assignment (bba) m s/p , with two focal sets: the singleton {θ1 } and the FoD Θ,
defined as follows:
N
! N
&
m p ({θ1 }) = xi/p + x j/p xk/p . . . xL/p (1 − xi/p )
"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!#$!!!!!!!!!!!!!!%
i=1 i=1
1:N−1 terms
j,k,...,L=1...N
j!k!...!L!i
N
!
m p (Θ) = (1 − xi/p )
i=1
Wireless sensor nodes communicate via their radio modules. Two nodes
are directly connected if they can transmit/receive data to/from each other.
A sensor communication model (or a transmission model) is a mathematical
model that quantifies the direct connectivity between sensor nodes.
d
PL(d) = PL(d0 ) + 10γ log10 ( )+ [1.7]
d0
The received signal strength (Pr ) at a distance d is the output power of the
transmitter minus PL(d). Formally:
d
Pr (d) = Pt − PL(d) = Pt − PL(d0 ) − 10γ log10 ( )− [1.8]
d0
From equation [1.8] we have Pr (d) ∼ N(Pt − PL(d0 ) − 10γ log10 ( dd0 ), σ ).
Since Pr (d) is Gaussian, the probability of successful communication between
two sensors si and s j located at distance d from each other is:
where S S min represents the minimum acceptable signal strength and Q is the
complementary cumulative distribution function (CCDF) of a standard
Gaussian, i.e.
+∞
1 −t2
Q(x) = √ e 2 dt
2π x
8 Deploying Wireless Sensor Networks
−30
−40
−50
−60
−70
Pr (dBm)
−80
−90
−100
−110
−120
−130
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
distance (m)
Figure 1.5 shows the connectivity model related to this formulation. We see
clearly that some areas within the connectivity range receive power lower than
S S min . On the other hand, some areas outside the connectivity range receive
power higher than S S min . As mentioned before, this model reflects the fact
that there is no clear cut-off boundary between successful and unsuccessful
communication.
Figure 1.6. Typical WSN architecture. For a color version of the figure,
see www.iste.co.uk/senouci/wireless.zip
– flat versus hierarchical WSNs: in flat WSNs, all the sensor nodes are
assumed to be homogeneous and play the same role. However, in hierarchical
WSNs, a sensor node can be dedicated to a particular special function.
For instance, a sensor could be designated as a cluster-head, in charge of
communicating with adjacent clusters;
– single-hop versus multi-hop WSNs: in a single-hop WSN, sensor nodes
transmit their data directly to the sink. In a multi-hop WSN, multiple relaying
sensor nodes exist between sensors and sinks. A multi-hop WSN can be flat or
hierarchical.
Virginia Democratic.
1884—Democratic Platform.
1884.—Republican Platform.