Professional Documents
Culture Documents
204 OSCM Answer Key
204 OSCM Answer Key
:
P7264 [Total No. of Pages : 2
[5860] - 204
M.B.A. (Semester - II)
GC-10 204 : OPERATIONS AND SUPPLY CHAIN
MANAGEMENT
(2019 Pattern)
Time : 2½ Hours] [Max. Marks : 50
Instructions to the candidates :
1) All questions are compulsory.
2) Each question carries 10 marks.
3) Each question has an internal option.
4) Use of non-scientific calculator is permitted (as applicable).
Choosing the right layout for your production operation is crucial for efficiency,
productivity, and cost-effectiveness. Here's a breakdown of two common layouts, Fixed
Position and Cellular, to help you understand their differences:
• Disadvantages:
o Requires high worker flexibility and skill sets.
Cellular Layout:
• Concept: Workers and equipment are grouped into self-contained "cells" that
handle all the steps required to produce a specific product or component.
• Typical Examples: Electronic assembly lines, garment production, furniture
manufacturing.
• Advantages:
o Improves efficiency and reduces waste by minimizing movement and
processing time.
• Disadvantages:
o Requires careful planning and organization to ensure balanced workloads
within cells.
o May require more floor space and specialized equipment for each cell.
The best layout for your operation depends on several factors, including:
• Product type and volume: Fixed position is better for large, low-volume products,
while cellular is better for high-volume, standardized items.
• Production process complexity: Cellular layout is more efficient for complex
processes with many steps.
• Available space and resources: Fixed position layout requires less equipment but
more space for movement.
• Desired level of flexibility: Fixed position is more flexible for customization, while
cellular is less adaptable.
By carefully analyzing your production needs and constraints, you can choose the
layout that will optimize your operations and ensure long-term success.
Remember: These are just general guidelines, and variations of both layouts exist.
Consulting with experienced professionals can help you design the most efficient and
effective layout for your specific production environment.
Choosing the right layout for your production operation is crucial for efficiency,
productivity, and cost-effectiveness. Here's a breakdown of two common layouts, Fixed
Position and Cellular, to help you understand their differences:
• Disadvantages:
o Requires high worker flexibility and skill sets.
Cellular Layout:
• Concept: Workers and equipment are grouped into self-contained "cells" that
handle all the steps required to produce a specific product or component.
• Typical Examples: Electronic assembly lines, garment production, furniture
manufacturing.
• Advantages:
o Improves efficiency and reduces waste by minimizing movement and
processing time.
• Disadvantages:
o Requires careful planning and organization to ensure balanced workloads
within cells.
o May require more floor space and specialized equipment for each cell.
The best layout for your operation depends on several factors, including:
• Product type and volume: Fixed position is better for large, low-volume products,
while cellular is better for high-volume, standardized items.
• Production process complexity: Cellular layout is more efficient for complex
processes with many steps.
• Available space and resources: Fixed position layout requires less equipment but
more space for movement.
• Desired level of flexibility: Fixed position is more flexible for customization, while
cellular is less adaptable.
By carefully analyzing your production needs and constraints, you can choose the
layout that will optimize your operations and ensure long-term success.
Remember: These are just general guidelines, and variations of both layouts exist.
Consulting with experienced professionals can help you design the most efficient and
effective layout for your specific production environment.
Q3) a) 'Stop making assumptions regarding the production and start planning your
capacity'. Interpret this statement with respect to auto ancillary unit.
The statement "Stop making assumptions regarding production and start planning your
capacity" carries significant implications for an auto ancillary unit, urging them to shift
from guesswork to a data-driven, proactive approach to production planning. Here's a
breakdown:
Current State:
• Assumption-based production: This likely involves relying on past trends,
seasonal fluctuations, or customer orders to estimate production requirements.
This can lead to:
o Inventory imbalances: Overproduction of certain components can lead to
storage costs and obsolescence, while underproduction can cause delays
and delivery issues.
o Inefficient resource allocation: Machines and personnel may be
underutilized or overloaded, leading to inefficiencies and decreased
productivity.
o Poor responsiveness to market changes: Inability to adapt to sudden
demand spikes or dips.
Shifting to Planned Capacity:
By moving away from assumptions and embracing planned capacity, auto ancillary
units can significantly improve their efficiency, responsiveness, and profitability. This
proactive approach is crucial in today's dynamic auto market, ensuring they remain
competitive and adaptable to changing customer needs.
OR
b) Illustrate the steps involved in Material Requirement Planning with special
reference to home appliances manufacturing company.
Material Requirements Planning (MRP) in a Home Appliances
Manufacturing Company
MRP is a system that helps manufacturers plan and manage the materials
needed for production. Here's how it works in a home appliances
manufacturing company:
1. Master Production Schedule (MPS):
• The first step is to create a MPS, which outlines the production quantities
and timelines for each appliance model over a set period.
2. Bill of Materials (BOM):
• For each model, a BOM is created, listing all the raw materials,
components, and sub-assemblies required to produce it. This includes
information like quantity, specifications, and lead times.
3. Inventory Records:
• The company maintains accurate records of all materials currently in stock,
including their location, quantity, and status (available, reserved, on order).
4. Gross Requirements Calculation:
• Using the MPS and BOM, MRP calculates the total quantity of each
material needed for the entire production period. This is called the gross
requirement.
5. Net Requirements Calculation:
• MRP then subtracts the existing inventory levels (available and on order)
from the gross requirements to determine the net requirement for each
material. This is the amount that needs to be purchased or produced.
6. Purchase Orders and Production Orders:
• Based on the net requirements, MRP generates purchase orders for
materials not already available or on order. For internally produced
components, production orders are generated for the required quantities
and timeframes.
7. Order Tracking and Monitoring:
• MRP tracks the status of all purchase orders and production orders,
ensuring materials arrive or are produced on time to avoid delays in the
production schedule.
8. Adjustments and Replanning:
• MRP is a dynamic system that allows for adjustments based on changes in
demand, inventory levels, or lead times. It can automatically recalculate
requirements and update orders as needed.
Benefits of MRP for Home Appliances Manufacturing:
• Reduced inventory costs: By accurately predicting material needs, MRP
minimizes the amount of inventory that needs to be stored, reducing
carrying costs and the risk of obsolescence.
• Improved production efficiency: MRP ensures that all necessary materials
are available when needed, preventing production delays and bottlenecks.
• Increased responsiveness to demand: MRP can quickly adapt to changes in
demand by adjusting production plans and material orders.
• Improved cost control: Accurate forecasting and planning help to optimize
material purchases and minimize waste, leading to lower overall
production costs.
• Enhanced customer satisfaction: On-time delivery of finished goods
improves customer satisfaction and loyalty.
Conclusion:
MRP is a valuable tool for home appliances manufacturers, helping them
optimize their production processes, reduce costs, and improve
customer satisfaction. By implementing an effective MRP system,
manufacturers can gain a competitive edge in the market.
Note: This is a simplified overview of MRP. The specific details and
features of the system will vary depending on the size and complexity
of the manufacturing operation.
P.T.O.
Q4) a) Categorize various inventory control techniques and appraise the inventory
control policies with respect to ABC Analysis.
OR
b) M/s Unique Carb Tooling Company buys its requirement of component
at the rate of Rs. 10 each from a local vendor every quarter. The average
monthly requirement of component is 600 nos. 10% extra components
are procured to take care of in-process rejection. The procurement cost
and inventory carrying cost have been calculated at Rs. 50 per order and
20% of average inventory investment.
Calculate :
i) Economic Order Quantity to optimize the cost.
ii) What is the total inventory cost of existing inventory policy?
iii) How much company can save by switching over EOQ buying
inventory policy?
Calculating Optimal Order Quantity and Inventory Costs for Unique Carb Tooling
Company
Given Information:
• Component price: Rs. 10/unit
• Average monthly requirement: 600 units
• Order cost: Rs. 50/order
• Inventory carrying cost: 20% of average inventory investment
• Extra procurement: 10%
1. Calculate Economic Order Quantity (EOQ):
EOQ = √(2 Annual Demand Ordering Cost / Holding Cost per Unit)
• Annual Demand = Monthly Demand 12 = 600 units/month 12 months/year =
7200 units/year
• Holding Cost per Unit = Price Carrying Cost % = Rs. 10/unit 20% = Rs. 2/unit
EOQ = √(2 7200 50 / 2) = √(720000) = 849.85 units
Round down EOQ to the nearest whole number to avoid partial units: EOQ = 849 units
2. Total Inventory Cost of Existing Policy:
• Order Cost per Quarter = Ordering Cost/Quarter = Rs. 50/order 1 order/quarter
= Rs. 50/quarter
• Quarterly Requirement = Monthly Requirement 3 months/quarter = 600
units/month 3 months/quarter = 1800 units/quarter
• Inventory Carrying Cost = Average Inventory Carrying Cost %
• Average Inventory = (Reorder Level + Safety Stock) / 2
• Reorder Level = Quarterly Requirement - Lead Time (assumed as 0 for local
vendor) = 1800 units
• Safety Stock = Extra Procurement % Reorder Level = 10% 1800 units = 180
units
• Average Inventory = (1800 + 180) / 2 = 990 units
• Inventory Carrying Cost = 990 units 20% = Rs. 198/quarter
• Total Inventory Cost per quarter = Order Cost + Inventory Carrying Cost = Rs. 50
+ Rs. 198 = Rs. 248/quarter
3. Inventory Cost Savings with EOQ:
• Order Cost per year = Orders per year Ordering Cost = 4 orders/year (7200
EOQ / 1800 quarterly req.) Rs. 50/order = Rs. 200/year
• Annual Inventory Carrying Cost = EOQ Carrying Cost % / 2 = 849 units 20% / 2
= Rs. 84.90/year
• Total Inventory Cost per year with EOQ = Order Cost + Inventory Carrying Cost
= Rs. 200 + Rs. 84.90 = Rs. 284.90/year
• Inventory Cost Savings with EOQ = Existing Cost - EOQ Cost = Rs. 248/quarter
4 quarters/year - Rs. 284.90/year = Rs. 492/year
Conclusion:
By switching to an EOQ-based inventory policy, Unique Carb Tooling Company can
save Rs. 492 per year on their component inventory costs. This represents a significant
improvement in inventory management efficiency and cost reduction.
Note: This calculation assumes a constant demand throughout the year. In real-world
scenarios, demand fluctuations might require adjusting the EOQ calculation or
incorporating safety stock strategies.
Q5) a) Compose Generic Supply Chain Structure for new start-up of vegetable
and fruit selling company. The company receives the orders on their
Android and IOS APP. Workable assumptions can be considered.
1. Supplier Network:
- Identify and establish relationships with local farmers, distributors, and
wholesalers for a diverse range of fresh fruits and vegetables.
- Ensure reliable and quality sources for the products.
2. Order Placement:
- Customers place orders through the Android and iOS app.
- The app should have user-friendly features, secure payment gateways, and
real-time inventory updates.
3. Order Processing:
- Upon order placement, the system generates notifications to the warehouse
and relevant suppliers.
- Automated order processing system to streamline operations.
4. Inventory Management:
- Maintain real-time inventory through an integrated system.
- Implement barcoding or RFID technology for efficient tracking.
5. Warehousing:
- Have centralized warehouses strategically located for efficient distribution.
- Implement FIFO (First In, First Out) inventory management to ensure
product freshness.
6. Packaging:
- Design standardized packaging for different products.
- Consider eco-friendly packaging options.
7. Quality Control:
- Conduct regular quality checks at the warehouse to ensure products meet
standards.
- Implement a feedback loop to improve quality based on customer reviews.
8. Distribution:
- Utilize a fleet of delivery vehicles for local deliveries.
- Explore partnerships with third-party logistics for wider coverage.
9. Last-Mile Delivery:
- Implement a route optimization system for efficient last-mile delivery.
- Provide customers with real-time tracking of their orders.
These components provide a broad overview, and the specific details would
depend on the scale, location, and nature of the business. The key is to
create a flexible and responsive supply chain that can adapt to the
evolving needs of the business and its customers.
1. Process Layout:
- Objective: Efficient utilization of resources, flexibility in handling
diverse product types.
- Evaluation: Suitable for high variety and low to moderate volume
production. It allows for easy adaptation to changes in product types.
However, it may not be as efficient for high-volume manufacturing
due to frequent material handling and longer travel distances.
3. Fixed-Position Layout:
- Objective: Managing large and bulky products that stay in one location
while workers and equipment come to it.
- Evaluation: Suitable for projects with large-scale products, such as
shipbuilding or construction. Not ideal for high-volume manufacturing
of smaller products due to limited economies of scale and potential
inefficiencies.
Overall Evaluation:
- Yearly Product Requirement: For high-volume manufacturing units, a
product layout is generally more effective in meeting yearly product
requirements efficiently. It allows for a streamlined and continuous
production process, reducing lead times and enhancing productivity.
Considerations:
- Flexibility vs. Efficiency: The trade-off between flexibility and efficiency
is crucial. High-volume manufacturing units often prioritize efficiency
and cost-effectiveness, favoring product layouts. However, a balance
must be struck to accommodate changes in product types or
production requirements.