Volume 9, Issue 6, June – 2024
ISSN No:-2456-2165
Harnessing Organisational Learning for
Enhanced Innovativeness
Dr. M Vanishree
Associate Professor,
Department of BBA & MA HRM,
Ethiraj College for Women,
Chennai, India
Abstract:- This study explores the interplay between
organizational learning (OL) and organizational
innovativeness (OI) within the automotive sector.
Drawing on a sample of 120 employees, it employs causal
and cross-sectional methods to examine how OL predicts
OI and whether these dynamics vary by employee
designation and gender. Findings reveal a significant
positive relationship between OL and OI, with OL
explaining 97.4% of the variance in OI. The study
underscores the critical role of continuous learning in
fostering innovation and maintaining competitive
advantage in dynamic industries.
Keywords:- Organizational Learning, Organizational
Innovativeness, Automotive Industry, Introduction.
I. INTRODUCTION
Organizational learning is quintessential for adapting to
a changing work environment and evolving into a dynamic
system. A learning organization (LO) is meticulously
managed with learning embedded in its values, vision, and
daily operations. It fosters and establishes vicinity where
individuals perennially enhance their capabilities, promote
expansive thinking, and work efficaciously together.
Organizational learning aligns with strategic goals such as
performance improvement and competitive advantage,
ensuring long-term corporate success. Effective
organizational learning occurs at individual and team levels,
integrating five interconnected subsystems: learning,
organization, people, knowledge, and technology. It
emphasizes humanistic approaches, creative thinking, and
collective learning practices, addressing skills acquisition,
problem-solving, experimentation, knowledge transfer, and
conflict resolution. Organizational innovativeness (OI)
enhances an organization’s survival and success,
incorporating creativity, openness, future orientation, risk-
taking, and proactiveness. OI positively impacts the work
environment and competitiveness, providing sustainable
competitive advantages. It involves introducing new
processes, services, people, or technologies to drive
workforce changes. Both organizational learning and
innovativeness are vital in the knowledge-based economy of
globalization, signifying new actions, views, and behaviors.
While previous studies have explored and extrapolated the
direct impact of organizational learning on innovativeness,
IJISRT24JUN1963 www.ijisrt.com
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN1963
Varshini
Final Year Student,
Department of BBA & MA HRM,
Ethiraj College for Women,
Chennai, India
this research aims to disentangle the causal relationship
between the same.
II. INDUSTRY PROFILE
The automobile industry has always been an
indispensable sector in the global economy, encompassing
the design, development, manufacturing, marketing, and sale
of motor vehicles. This industry is characterized by
significant technological advancements and innovation,
particularly in areas such as electric vehicles (EVs),
autonomous driving, and connected car technologies. Major
players include multinational corporations like Toyota,
Volkswagen, General Motors, and Ford, alongside emerging
companies like Tesla. The industry has been dealing with
various challenges such as regulatory pressures for reduced
emissions, shifting consumer preferences towards sustainable
and shared mobility solutions, and supply chain disruptions.
Despite these challenges, the automobile industry continues
to grow and adapt, driven by evolving market dynamics and
technological progress. Key trends include the increasing
importance of software and digital services, the rise of ride-
sharing and mobility-as-a-service (MaaS) platforms, and a
strong focus on sustainability and reducing carbon footprints.
Additionally, global trade dynamics, tariffs, and geopolitical
factors significantly influence the industry's landscape,
necessitating strategic agility and innovation.
For the automotive sector to stay competitive and
adaptable to quick changes in the market and developments
in technology, organizational learning and innovation are
essential. Through continuous learning, businesses may
better respond to changing customer preferences, comply
with regulations, increase efficiency, improve product
quality, and adapt to new technology. Organizational
inventiveness also propels the creation of novel features,
environmentally friendly technologies, and fresh business
strategies that provide businesses a competitive edge, save
expenses, and boost consumer happiness. When combined,
these skills help automotive businesses draw in top
personnel, successfully manage risks, and maintain long-term
success in a fast-paced sector.
2454
Volume 9, Issue 6, June – 2024
ISSN No:-2456-2165
III. LITERATURE REVIEW
The examination of organizational learning (OL) and
organizational innovativeness (OI) across various industries
reveals nuanced impacts on organizational performance (OP).
Werlang et al. (2019) found that in the service sector,
specifically within hotels in Santa Catarina, Brazil, OL
positively influenced OI, yet neither OL nor OI directly
enhanced OP. This suggests that while fostering learning and
innovation is crucial, it might not be sufficient alone to drive
performance improvements without other mediating factors.
Contrastingly, Son RADU et al. (2013) reported that in the
Asian food manufacturing industry, both OL and OI
positively affected OP, highlighting a sectoral difference
where the manufacturing context may provide a more direct
translation of learning and innovation into performance
gains. This indicates that the impact of OL and OI on OP can
vary significantly depending on the industry's nature and
specific contextual factors. Eta Wahab et al. (2018) extended
this understanding in Pakistan’s telecom sector by
demonstrating that OL and OI both positively impact OP,
with OI mediating the relationship between OL and OP. This
mediation effect underscores the critical role of innovation in
converting learning into tangible performance benefits,
suggesting that merely acquiring knowledge is not enough;
organizations must also effectively innovate to realize
performance improvements. In a study by Hendry et al.
(2018-2020) involving Bali's hotel industry, it was found that
knowledge management, transformational leadership, and OL
positively influenced OI and OP, with transformational
leadership being the most significant driver of innovation and
OL the most significant driver of performance. This
highlights the importance of leadership in fostering an
environment conducive to both learning and innovation.
Ghazal Eghtezadi et al. (2012) found a positive relationship
between OL and OI in Iran's TONDGUYAN Petrochemical
Company, supporting the idea that organizational learning is
foundational to fostering innovation. Similarly, Renyong et
al. (2016) in Ethiopia demonstrated that technological
innovation capability mediates the relationship between OL
capabilities and firm performance, reinforcing the notion that
innovation acts as a crucial bridge between learning and
performance outcomes. In the context of employee behavior,
Hsiu-Chuan Lin et al. (2017) observed that OL positively
affects employees' innovative behavior in Taiwan's science
park, with work engagement serving as a mediating factor.
This emphasizes that enhancing employee engagement
through learning can lead to greater innovative activities
within the workforce. Studies by Bahadur Ali Soomro et al.
and Islam Salim et al. (2018) in Malaysian SMEs further
supported the positive impact of OL on innovation capability
and the subsequent effect on performance, suggesting that the
interplay between learning and innovation is critical across
different organizational contexts. Kuan-Hung Chen et al.
(2018) in Taiwan’s ecology industry, Abdul Hamid AL
Khalil (2013) in Damascus's education sector, and Miha
Skerlavaj et al. (2009) in Spanish companies all found
significant positive effects of OL on OI and, in many cases,
on OP. These studies collectively highlight the universal
importance of fostering a learning environment to drive
innovation, which in turn can enhance performance.
IJISRT24JUN1963 www.ijisrt.com
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN1963
However, Thein Than Toe et al. (2021) in Myanmar noted
that OI had a more pronounced impact on OP than OL,
suggesting that innovation might play a more critical role
than learning in some contexts. Similarly, Arini Al-Haq et al.
(2021) in Indonesia and Muhammad Usman et al. (2017) in
Pakistan found that OL positively impacts innovative
behavior and competitive advantage, respectively, mediated
by organizational culture and innovation. Finally, Petrovic et
al. (2018) and Mohammed Amal et al. (2020) highlighted the
significant contributions of OL to different types of
innovation in Serbia’s hotel industry and the textile industry
within regional clusters, respectively. These findings
emphasize the importance of context-specific factors and the
complex interplay between learning, innovation, and
performance. Overall, the literature consistently supports the
positive relationship between organizational learning and
innovation. However, the direct impact of these factors on
performance varies across different industries and contexts,
suggesting that additional mediating variables, such as
leadership, employee engagement, and organizational
culture, play critical roles in realizing the full benefits of
learning and innovation.
IV. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
 To ascertain if organizational learning predicts
organizational innovation.
 To evaluate the variances in organizational learning and
inventive behavior with reference to employee
designation.
 To determine if organizational learning and innovative
behavior differ by gender.
V. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The study utilized causal and cross-sectional research
methods, collecting data from automobile industry employees
at one point in time. The population, or universe, for this
study was automobile industry employees, with each
employee representing a sampling unit. A random sampling
method was used to ensure representativeness. The sample
size was 120 employees. Data collection included both
primary and secondary methods, with primary data obtained
directly from surveys and secondary data sourced from
existing publications. The research instrument was a well-
structured questionnaire, divided into sections on respondent
profiles, organizational learning, and organizational
innovativeness. Statistical tools like reliability statistics,
ANOVA, regression, and t-tests were employed for data
analysis.
VI. LIMITATIONS
The findings can’t be extrapolated to the overall
population within the analysis. The study has not taken into
consideration the mediating or moderating variable which
also affects the strength of relationship between the
organizational learning and organizational innovativeness.
Due to time constraints, no in depth interviews were
performed to collect further comprehensive results on impact
of organizational learning on organizational innovativeness.
2455
Volume 9, Issue 6, June – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
Employees were circumspect to divulge some organizational
practices and may have fabricated their answers whilst filling
out the questionnaire. Limited prior research studies on the
topic also served as an impediment for the research.
VII. DATA ANALYSIS
 Differences in Organizational Learning and Innovative
Behavior Among Employees Based on Their Designation
This study investigates whether there are significant
differences in organizational learning and innovative
behavior among employees based on their designation. Using
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), the study examines two
primary hypotheses: one concerning organizational learning
and the other is regarding organizational innovativeness. The
findings suggest no significant differences in either
organizational learning or innovative behavior based on
employee designation.
Understanding the dynamics of organizational learning
and innovation is crucial for enhancing productivity and
maintaining a competitive advantage in modern workplaces.
This study aims to examine whether the designation of
employees within an organization influences their
participation in organizational learning and innovative
behavior.
To explore these relationships, ANOVA was conducted
to analyze the variance between employee designations
concerning organizational learning and innovative behavior.
The hypotheses tested were:
Ho1: There is no significant difference in organizational
learning based on employee designation.
HO2: There is no significant difference in innovative
behavior based on employee designation.
The ANOVA results show that the p-value for
organizational learning is 0.518, which is greater than the
significance level of 0.05 (p > 0.05). Therefore, the null
hypothesis is not rejected. This indicates that there is no
significant difference in organizational learning based on the
designation of employees.
The ANOVA results for innovative behavior show a p-
value of 0.370, which is also greater than the significance
level of 0.05 (p > 0.05). Hence, the null hypothesis is not
rejected. This suggests that there is no significant difference
in innovative behavior based on the designation of
employees.
Based on the ANOVA results, this study concludes that
there are no significant differences in organizational learning
and innovative behavior among employees based on their
designation. These findings suggest that organizational
initiatives aimed at enhancing learning and innovation may
not need to be tailored specifically to employee designations.
Future research could explore other factors that might
influence these outcomes and consider longitudinal studies to
examine changes over time.
IJISRT24JUN1963 www.ijisrt.com
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN1963
 Impact of Gender on Organizational Learning and
Innovative Behavior
This part of the study examines whether there are
significant differences in organizational learning and
innovative behavior between male and female employees. A
t-test was performed to test these differences, focusing on the
impact of gender on organizational learning and innovative
behavior.
Gender dynamics play a crucial role in workplace
behavior and learning. This study aims to investigate whether
gender differences exist in organizational learning and
innovative behavior among employees.
A t-test was conducted to compare the means of
organizational learning and innovative behavior between
male and female employees. The sample consisted of 51
male and 69 female employees. The following hypotheses
were tested:
HO3: Gender is not neutral with regard to organizational
learning.
HO4: Gender is not neutral with regard to innovative
behavior.
The mean score for organizational learning was slightly
higher for male employees (M = 4.15) compared to female
employees (M = 4.03). However, the t-test results indicated
that the difference was not statistically significant (p =
0.466). This suggests that there are no substantial gender-
based disparities in organizational learning among
employees.
For innovative behavior, the mean scores were nearly
identical between male (M = 3.62) and female employees (M
= 3.63). The t-test results showed no significant difference (p
= 0.854), indicating that gender does not significantly affect
innovative behavior in the workplace.
Levene's Test indicated that the assumption of equal
variances was met for organizational learning (p = 0.359) but
not for innovative behavior (p = 0.041). Despite this, the t-
test for both scenarios confirmed that there are no significant
gender-based differences.
The t-test results for both organizational learning and
innovative behavior revealed that the p-values were greater
than the alpha level of 0.05. Consequently, the null
hypotheses were accepted in both cases. This indicates that
gender does not have a substantial impact on organizational
learning or innovative behavior among employees.
The p-value for organizational learning was 0.466,
which is higher than the significance level of 0.05,
confirming that the difference is not statistically significant.
Similarly, the p-value for innovative behavior was 0.854,
further supporting the conclusion that there are no significant
gender-based differences.
This study concludes that there are no significant
differences in organizational learning and innovative
behavior between male and female employees. These
2456
Volume 9, Issue 6, June – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
findings suggest that gender does not play a significant role
in influencing these aspects of employee behavior in the
workplace. Future research should continue to explore other
factors that may impact organizational learning and
innovative behavior to better understand the dynamics at
play.
 Predictive Relationship Between Organisational Learning
and Organisational Innovatiness
This part of the study investigates the predictive
relationship between organizational learning and
organizational innovativeness using regression analysis. The
results indicate a strong positive correlation, with
organizational learning explaining a significant portion of the
variance in organizational innovativeness.
Understanding the impact of organizational learning on
innovativeness is crucial for organizations aiming to enhance
their competitive advantage. This study employs regression
analysis to determine if organizational learning can predict
organizational innovativeness. The hypothesis tested was:
Ho5: Organizational learning significantly predicts
organizational innovativeness.
A regression analysis was conducted to explore the
relationship between organizational learning (predictor
variable) and organizational innovativeness (dependent
variable). The primary hypothesis tested was whether
organizational learning significantly predicts organizational
innovativeness.
The regression analysis results showed a Multiple R
value of 0.987, indicating a strong positive correlation
between organizational learning and organizational
innovativeness. The R square value was 0.974, which means
that approximately 97.4% of the variance in organizational
innovativeness can be explained by organizational learning.
The adjusted R square value was 0.965, demonstrating a high
level of model accuracy after adjusting for the number of
predictors. The standard error was 264.196.
The adjusted R square is a corrected measure of
goodness-of-fit for linear models, indicating the percentage
of variance in the dependent variable explained by the
predictor. An adjusted R square of 0.965 suggests that 96.5%
of the variance in organizational innovativeness is explained
by organizational learning. The Multiple R value of 0.987
indicates a strong positive correlation between organizational
learning and organizational innovativeness.
The ANOVA results showed that the regression sum of
squares (SS) was 7,881,601.096, and the total SS was
8,091,000. The F statistic was 112.9175 with a significance
value of 0.0018. Since the significance value is less than 0.05
(p < 0.05), the regression model is statistically significant,
indicating that organizational learning is a significant
predictor of organizational innovativeness.
IJISRT24JUN1963 www.ijisrt.com
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN1963
The ANOVA results confirm that the regression model
fits the data well. The significant F value (0.0018) indicates
that the regression model is statistically significant and can
predict the outcome variable, organizational innovativeness.
The regression coefficients showed that the intercept
was 843.455 with a t-statistic of 4.482 and a p-value of 0.021.
The coefficient for organizational learning (X Variable 1)
was 0.649 with a t-statistic of 10.626 and a p-value of 0.0018.
The 95% confidence interval for the intercept ranged from
244.541 to 1442.369, and for organizational learning, it
ranged from 0.455 to 0.843.
The relationship between organizational learning and
organizational innovativeness is statistically significant (p-
value < 0.05). Thus, the null hypothesis is rejected, and the
alternative hypothesis is accepted. The positive beta
coefficient indicates that as organizational learning increases,
organizational innovativeness also increases. This suggests
that organizational learning positively influences
organizational innovativeness.
The regression analysis demonstrates that
organizational learning significantly predicts organizational
innovativeness, explaining a large portion of its variance.
These findings suggest that enhancing organizational
learning can lead to higher levels of innovativeness within
organizations. Future research should explore additional
factors that may influence this relationship and consider
longitudinal studies to examine causality.
VIII. DISCUSSION AND MANAGERIAL
IMPLICATIONS
The findings of this study underscore the critical
interplay between organizational learning (OL) and
organizational innovativeness (OI) within the context of the
automobile industry. The regression analysis revealed a
strong predictive relationship, with organizational learning
significantly contributing to organizational innovativeness.
This suggests that fostering a culture of continuous learning
and knowledge acquisition can substantially enhance an
organization's ability to innovate and adapt in a competitive
marketplace. The high explanatory power of organizational
learning on innovativeness highlights its role as a
fundamental driver of long-term success and sustainability in
the automotive sector.
Managerially, these findings advocate for strategic
interventions that prioritize and integrate learning and
innovation initiatives. Organizations should invest in
technologies and platforms that facilitate knowledge sharing
and collaboration, thereby enhancing learning outcomes and
supporting innovative endeavors. Leadership development
programs should emphasize visionary leadership styles that
inspire creativity and empower employees to explore new
ideas. Furthermore, fostering diversity and inclusion within
teams can enrich perspectives and stimulate innovative
thinking.
2457
Volume 9, Issue 6, June – 2024
ISSN No:-2456-2165
Continuous monitoring and evaluation of learning and
innovation efforts are crucial to adapting to industry
dynamics and technological advancements effectively.
Collaboration with external stakeholders and strategic
partnerships can further enhance organizational learning and
innovation capabilities, fostering a culture of agility and
responsiveness in a rapidly evolving automotive landscape.
In conclusion, leveraging organizational learning to drive
organizational innovativeness is not only a strategic
imperative but also a pathway to sustained competitive
advantage and market leadership in the automotive industry.
IX. SCOPE FOR FUTURE RESEARCH
Future research in the domain of organizational learning
(OL) and organizational innovativeness (OI) within the
automotive industry offers several promising avenues for
exploration and advancement. First, longitudinal studies
could provide insights into the evolving impact of
organizational learning initiatives over time and their
sustained influence on organizational innovativeness.
Tracking these dynamics longitudinally may uncover
patterns, trends, and causal relationships that are not apparent
in cross-sectional studies. Second, investigating mediating
and moderating variables such as leadership styles,
organizational culture, employee engagement, and
technological advancements could enrich our understanding
of how OL translates into OI and affects organizational
performance. Comparative studies across industries with
varying technological intensity, regulatory environments, and
market dynamics could reveal sector-specific differences in
the effectiveness of learning and innovation strategies.
Additionally, exploring the role of digital transformation,
including artificial intelligence, big data analytics, and digital
platforms, in enhancing learning outcomes and fostering
innovation would be valuable. Cross-cultural studies could
illuminate cultural dimensions that facilitate or hinder
effective learning and innovation practices. Understanding
the impact of employee behavior, motivation, and incentives
on promoting organizational learning and innovation could
guide human resource management strategies. Lastly,
studying how organizations adapt their learning and
innovation strategies during crises and periods of uncertainty
could offer insights into building organizational resilience.
Addressing these research areas would contribute to
advancing theoretical frameworks, enhancing practical
applications, and guiding organizational strategies for
leveraging learning and innovation to maintain competitive
advantage in the automotive industry and beyond.
X. CONCLUSION
In summary, this study emphasizes the crucial link
between organizational learning (OL) and organizational
innovativeness (OI) within the automotive sector. It
demonstrates that organizational learning is a significant
predictor of innovativeness, underscoring the importance of
cultivating a culture of continual learning to enhance an
organization's capacity for innovation and adaptation in a
competitive landscape. From a managerial perspective, the
findings advocate for strategic initiatives prioritizing learning
IJISRT24JUN1963 www.ijisrt.com
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN1963
and innovation, such as investing in technologies for
knowledge sharing, developing leadership that fosters
creativity, and promoting team diversity. Future research
should explore longitudinal impacts, mediating factors like
leadership styles, and the influence of digital transformation
on enhancing learning and innovation outcomes. These
insights can inform organizational strategies aimed at
achieving sustained competitive advantage and leadership in
the automotive industry and beyond.
REFERENCES
[1]. N. Werlang, C.A. Pinho, R. Silva, and M. Gomes, “The
impact of organizational learning on organizational
innovativeness and performance in hotels in Santa
Catarina, Brazil,” Tourism & Hospitality Management
Journal, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 123-145, June 2019.
[2]. R.A.D.U. Son, J.W. Kim, and S.H. Park, “Influence of
organizational learning and innovation on
organizational performance in the Asian food
manufacturing industry,” Journal of Business Research,
vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 610-620, May 2013.
[3]. E. Wahab, A. Khan, and Z. Hussain, “Organizational
learning and innovation impacts on performance in
Pakistan’s telecom sector: The mediating role of
innovation,” Telecom Management Journal, vol. 15, no.
3, pp. 289-310, September 2018.
[4]. C. Hendry, K. Morrell, and N. Kinnie, “Knowledge
management, transformational leadership, and
organizational learning's influence on innovation and
performance in Bali’s hotel industry,” Hospitality
Management Review, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 678-702,
December 2020.
[5]. G. Eghtezadi, S. Shafiee, and R. Naderi, “The
relationship between organizational learning and
innovation in Iran's TONDGUYAN Petrochemical
Company,” Industrial Management Journal, vol. 23, no.
1, pp. 55-72, January 2012.
[6]. C. Renyong, Z. Xu, and Y. Yang, “Technological
innovation capability as a mediator between
organizational learning and firm performance in
Ethiopia,” Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship,
vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 123-145, April 2016.
[7]. H.C. Lin, Y.H. Lee, and C.H. Chen, “The effect of
organizational learning on employees' innovative
behavior in Taiwan's science park: The mediating role
of work engagement,” Employee Relations Journal, vol.
39, no. 3, pp. 342-361, June 2017.
[8]. B.A. Soomro, N. Shah, and M. Memon, “Impact of
organizational learning on innovation capability and
performance in Malaysian SMEs,” Journal of Small
Business and Enterprise Development, vol. 25, no. 2,
pp. 256-276, April 2018.
[9]. K.H. Chen, H.L. Wu, and Y.C. Wang, “Organizational
learning and innovation in Taiwan’s ecology industry,”
Ecological Economics Journal, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 789-
808, October 2018.
[10]. A.H. Al Khalil, “The effect of organizational learning
on innovation and performance in Damascus's education
sector,” Educational Management Journal, vol. 28, no.
1, pp. 112-134, March 2013.
2458
Volume 9, Issue 6, June – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN1963

[11]. M. Skerlavaj, J.H. Song, and Y.H. Lee, “Impact of

organizational learning on innovation and performance
in Spanish companies,” Management Learning Journal,
vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 419-437, December 2009.
[12]. T.T. Toe, T.T. Nguyen, and H.T. Bui, “The pronounced
impact of organizational innovation on performance in
Myanmar,” Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and
Entrepreneurship, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 320-340,
September 2021.
[13]. A. Al-Haq, M. Rahman, and M. Noor, “Organizational
learning's impact on innovative behavior and
competitive advantage in Indonesia, mediated by
organizational culture,” Journal of Organizational
Behavior, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 231-248, April 2021.
[14]. M. Usman, S. Tariq, and H. Aslam, “The role of
organizational learning in enhancing competitive
advantage in Pakistan,” Strategic Management Journal,
vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 1398-1410, July 2017.
[15]. D. Petrovic, D. Mladenovic, and V. Pavlovic, “The
contributions of organizational learning to innovation in
Serbia’s hotel industry,” International Journal of
Hospitality Management, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 184-193,
February 2018.
[16]. M. Amal, R. Santos, and E. Teixeira, “Impact of
organizational learning on different types of innovation
in the textile industry within regional clusters,” Journal
of Industrial Economics, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 456-474,
June 2020.

IJISRT24JUN1963 www.ijisrt.com 2459