Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Para
Para
Para
TP
NASA 2001
Technical c .1
Paper
2001
April 1982
-
-
-
-
0
Performance of Single-Stage 0-
4-
0 - E
Royce D. Moore
and Lonnie Reid
NASA ..
TECH LIBRARY KAFB, NM
NASA
Technical
Paper
2001
1982
Performance of Single-Stage
Axial-Flow Transonic Compressor
With Rotor and Stator Aspect
Ratios of 1.63and 1.77,
Respectively, and With Design
Pressure Ratio of 2.05
Royce D. Moore
and Lonnie Reid
Z,eur is K vsenrch Center
C le-iieIn ?i d , 0 h io
Natbonal Aeronautics
and Space Admtnislration
Scientific and Technical
Information Branch
reference 2. Detailed blade-element data for stages 35,
Summary 36, and 37 are presented in references 3, 4, and 5 ,
The overall and blade-element performance of an respectively.
axial-flow transonic compressor stage is presented. This This report presents the detailed radial distribution of
stage is one of a series of single stages that was designed performance parameters and blade-element data for the
and tested to investigate the effects of aspect ratio and higher-aspect-ratio, higher-pressure-ratio stage in this
pressure ratio on the performance characteristics of inlet series (stage 38). The overall performance of the stage is
stages of an advanced-core compressor. This stage was also included. Data are presented over the stable
designed for a pressure ratio of 2.05 at a flow of 20.2 operating flow range for rotative speeds from 50 to 100
kilograms per second and a tip speed of 455 meters per percent of design speed. Data are presented in tabular
second. The rotor aspect ratio is 1.63 and the stator form as well as in plots. The symbols are defined and the
aspect ratio is 1.77. The stage was tested over the stable equations presented in appendixes A and B.
operating flow range from 50 to 100 percent of design
speed. At design speed the rotor achieved a peak
efficiency of 0.849 at a pressure ratio of 1.969. The stage Aerodynamic Design
peak efficiency of 0.831 occurred at a pressure ratio of The detailed aerodynamic design is presented in
1.944. For both the rotor and the stage, peak efficiency reference 1 and, therefore, only a brief summary of the
occurred at the minimum flow conditions, which were aerodynamic design parameters is presented herein.
higher than the design flow. The flow path geometry, including instrumentation
stations, is shown in figure 1. The design overall
performance parameters are shown in table I. The stage
Introduction was designed for a total-pressure ratio of 2.05, an airflow
The research program on axial-flow fans and of 20.2 kilograms per second, and a rotor-tip speed of
compressors for advanced airbreathing engines at the 455 meters per second. The design blade-element
NASA Lewis Research Center includes the study of parameters are presented in table 11. The rotor-inlet
advanced-core compressor designs typical of those relative Mach number varies from 1.486 at the tip to
required to achieve pressure ratios to 20 in as few as six 1.118 at the hub; the stator-inlet Mach number varies
stages. A preliminary study of the aerodynamic and from 0.712 at the tip to 0.792 at the hub. The rotor
mechanical design was conducted for an eight-stage core diffusion factor at the hub and tip is roughly 0.58, with a
compressor with a pressure ratio of 20 and an inlet rotor- maximum value of 0.61 at 85 percent of span; the stator
tip speed of 455 meters per second. The flow path had a hub diffusion factor of 0.58 is the maximum value.
constant meanline diameter with an inlet hub-tip ratio of The blade geometry is presented in table I11 for the
0.7. Both the speed and the loading per stage are rotor and the stator. Both the rotor and the stator have
considerably higher than in current state-of-the-art core multiple-circular-arc (MCA) blade shapes. The rotor has
compressors. The design was used to pattern single stages 48 blades, the tip solidity is 1.3, and the aspect ratio is
that are representative of the inlet, middle, and rear 1.63. The stator has 62 blades, the tip solidity is 1.3, and
stages of the eight-stage 20-pressure-ratio compressor. the aspect ratio is 1.77. The rotor and the stator are
Four single stages that are representative of the inlet shown in figure 2. Manufacturing coordinates for both
stage for a multistage compressor were designed and rotor and stator are presented in reference 1.
tested. These four stages (designated stages 35, 36, 37,
and 38) represent two levels of pressure ratio and two
levels of rotor aspect ratio. Stage 35 was the first stage of Apparatus and Procedure
the eight-stage design. Stages 35 and 37 have a rotor
aspect ratio of 1.19 and design pressure ratios of 1.82 and Compressor Test Facility
2.05, respectively; stages 36 and 38 have a rotor aspect The compressor stage was tested in the Lewis single-
ratio of 1.63 and design pressure ratios of 1.82 and 2.05, stage compressor test facility (fig. 3), which is described
respectively. The design and the overall performance in detail in reference 6. Atmosphericair enters the facility
comparison for all four stages are presented in refer at an inlet located on the roof of the building and flows
ence 1. A brief summary of both the overall and blade- through the flow-measuringorifice and into the plenum
element performance of the four stages is presented in upstream of the test stage. The air passes through the
experimental compressor stage into the collector and the were set at midgap because preliminary measurements
atmospheric exhaust system. showed that the static pressure across the gap was
essentially constant. Values of total pressure,
Instrumentation temperature, and flow angle were recorded at each
circumferential position at station 3. At the last
The airflow was determined from measurements on a
circumferential position, values of pressure, temperature,
calibrated thin-plate orifice. The orifice temperature was
and flow angle were also recorded at station 1. All probes
obtained from an average of two Chromel-constantan
were then traversed to the next radial position, and the
thermocouple readings. Orifice pressures were measured
circumferential traverse procedure was repeated.
by calibrated transducers. An electronic speed counter, in
conjuction with a magnetic pickup, was used to measure
rotative speed.
Radial surveys of.flow conditions at station 1 upstream Calculation Procedure
of the rotor (fig. 1) were made with two combination Measured total pressures, static pressures, and total
probes (fig. 4(a)) and two 18" wedge probes (fig. 4(b)). temperatures were corrected for Mach number and
The combination probe measures total temperature, total streamline slope. These corrections were based on an
pressure, and flow angle. The wedge probe measures average calibration for the type of instrument used.
static pressure and flow angle. Each probe was equipped Orifice airflow, rotative speed, total pressures, static
with a null-balancing control system that automatically pressures, and temperatures were all corrected to
aligned the probe with the flow direction. Chromel standard-day conditions based on the rotor inlet.
constantan thermocouples were used to measure The circumferential distribution of static pressure
temperature. downstream of the stator was set equal to the midgap
Because of the close spacing between the rotor and the values for each radial position. At each radial position,
stator (approx. 0.7 cm), no measurements were made averaged values of nine circumferential measurements of
between them. At station 3 (downstream of the stator) total pressure, total temperature, and flow angle
two combination probes and two wedge probes were downstream of the stator (station 3) were obtained in the
traversed both circumferentially and radially to obtain following manner: The midgap static pressure was used
the distribution of pressure, temperature, and flow angle. with the local total pressure, total temperature, and flow
Static-pressure taps were installed on both the inner angle to calculate the circumferential distributions of
and outer wall casings at stations 1 and 3. The velocity, static density, and axial and tangential velocity
circumferential location of the instrumentation at components. These distributions are used in the
stations 1 and 3 is shown in figure 5 . The estimated errors circumferential mass-averaging process. The nine values
in the data, as based on inherent accuracies of the of total temperature were mass averaged to obtain the
instrumentation and the recording system, are as follows: circumferentially averaged stator-outlet total
temperature. The nine values of total pressure were
Airflow, kg/sec .............................................. &0.3 divided by the rotor-inlet total pressure and converted to
Rotative speed, rpm.. ....................................... f 30 corresponding isentropic temperature ratios. These ratios
Flow angle, deg .............................................. & 1.0 were mass averaged, and the resulting value converted
Temperature, K.. ............................................ &0.6 (through the isentropic-temperature-ratio-pressure-ratio
Rotor-inlet (station 1) total pressure, N/cm 2........ &0.01 relation) to an average total-pressure ratio. The average
Rotor-inlet (station 1) static pressure, N/cm2.. ..... f0.03 absolute velocity was obtained from the midgap static
Stator-outlet (station 3) total pressure, N/cm2.. ....f 0.17 pressure, the average total pressure, and the average total
Stator-outlet (station 3) static pressure, N/cm 2..... kO.10 temperature. The average tangential velocity component
was calculated by mass averaging the local
circumferential values of tangential velocity. The average
Test Procedure absolute velocity and the average tangential velocity
The stage survey data were taken over a range of flows component were used to calculate the average axial
and speeds. For 70, 90,and 100 percent of design speed, velocity and flow angle. This calculation was performed
data were recorded at five or more flows from maximum for each of the two sets of probes at station 3. The results
to near-stall conditions. For 50, 60,and 80 percent of from each set of probes were averaged in the same
design speed, data were recorded at the near-stall flow manner as above to obtain single, averaged values of
only. Data were taken at nine radial positions for each total pressure, total temperature, static pressure, and
flow point. flow angle at each radial position. To obtain the overall
At each radial position the two combination probes performance, the radial distributions of the
behind the stator were traversed circumferentially to nine circumferentially averaged total temperature and total
locations across the stator gap. The wedge static probes pressure were averaged by using a procedure similar to
2
that used for averaging the circumferential distributions flow conditions. The rotor and stage pressure ratios at
of these parameters. The values of pressure, temperature, the peak efficiency conditions were 1.969 and 1.944,
and flow angle at station 2 were obtained as follows: At respectively. The design values of rotor and stage
each radial position total pressure and total temperature pressure ratio are 2.105 and 2.05. The stage stall point
were translated along design streamlines from station 3. and peak efficiency point occurred at a flow slightly
The mass-averaged total temperature was used as the higher than the design value. The peak rotor efficiencies
total temperature for station 2. The arithmetic mean of at 70 and 90 percent of design speed were 0.949 and
the three highest total-pressure values from the 0.901, respectively.
circumferential distribution at station 3 was used as the
total pressure at station 2. The radial distributions of Radial Distributions
static pressure and flow angle were caculated on the basis
Radial distributions of several parameters are
of continuity of mass flow and radial equilibrium. presented in figures 8 and 9 for the rotor and the stator,
Measured airflow, rotative speed, design values of
respectively, for design speed at three flow conditions:
geometry, and annulus wall blockages were specified. maximum, midflow, and near stall. These distributions
At each measuring station the integrated airflow was
show how the blade rows operated at various spanwise
computed from the survey data and is presented in table
locations for a given flow and the change in these
IV. The data, at the three stations, were translated to the parameters over the flow range. The design distributions
blade leading and trailing edges by the method presented
are presented by the solid symbols.
in reference 4.
Rotor.-The radial distributions of diffusion factor
At each of the six rotative speeds, the backpressure on
and meridional velocity ratio were very similar to the
the stage was increased (by closing the sleeve valve in the
design distributions. The radial distribution of incidence
collector) until a stalled condition was evident. Stall was
angle was different from design, being about 3 moreO
detected by a sudden drop in stage-outlet total pressure,
than design in the tip region and about 2" less than design
which was measured by a probe located at midpassage
in the hub region. In the tip region the lowest losses
and recorded on an X-Y plotter. Stall was also correlated
occurred at the maximum flow condition. For the near-
by large increases in blade stresses on both the rotor and
stall flow of 20.4 kilograms per second the diffusion
the stator, along with a sudden increase in noise level.
factor was less than design over the entire blade span. For
The airflow at stall was obtained in the following
all three flow conditions shown, the total-pressure ratio
manner: From a condition near stall the sleeve valve was'
and total-temperature ratio were significantly below the
slowly closed in small increments. At each increment the
design values.
airflow was obtained. The airflow obtained just before Reference 1 states that the steep wall-static-pressure
stall occurred is called the stall airflow. The pressure ratio
gradients caused by strong shock patterns were probably
at stall was obtained by extrapolating the total pressure
responsible for the relatively poor flow range of this
obtained from the survey data to the stall airflow.
stage.
Stator.-Since the rotor did not operate at its design
condition, the stator operated at off-design conditions
Results and Discussion over the entire blade span. The stage stalled at a flow
higher than design, and the temperature rise was less than
The results of this investigation are presented in three design. As a result the meridional velocity was greater
parts: overall performance of both the rotor and the than design and the tangential velocity was less. Thus the
stage, radial distribution of several performance measured incidence angles were less than the design
parameters, and blade-element data for both the rotor values. In the tip region both the deviation angle and the
and the stator. The overall performance data are losses were significantly higher than design values. The
presented in table IV. For each overall performance data losses over the remainder of the blade span were less than
point, blade-element data are presented for the rotor and the design values. Although the diffusion factor was the
stator in tables V and VI, respectively. The abbreviations lowest for a flow of 21.O kilograms per second, the losses
and units used for the tabular data are defined in were highest. This indicates that the stators were
appendix C. operating on the choke side of the loss curves.
Overall Performance I Variations with Incidence Angle
The overall performances for the rotor and the stage The variations of selected blade-element parameters
are presented in figures 6 and 7, respectively. At design with suction-surface incidence angle are presented in
speed the rotor and the stage achieved peak efficienciesof figures 10 and 11 for the rotor and the stator,
0.849 and 0.831,respectively. For both the rotor and the respectively. The data are presented for 70, 90, and 100
stage the peak efficiency occurred near the minimum percent of design speed for blade elements located at 5 ,
3
10,15,30,50,70,85,90,and 95 percent of span from the The rotor and the stator are not well matched,
blade tip. Design values are represented by solid symbols, especially in the region from the tip to 30 percent of span.
and experimental values by open symbols. The data Most of the rotor elements have minimum losses at or
presented are computer plotted, and occasionally a data near the maximum flow conditions. The stator elements,
point will be omitted because it falls outside the mnge of however, appear to have their minimum losses at or near
the parameters shown in the figure. These data do the minimum flow conditions.
appear, however, in the appropriate tables in this report.
In this section comparisons are made between design
values and design speed data. Summary of Results
Rotor.-Meridional velocity ratio, inlet relative Mach This report has presented the overall and bladeelement
number, deviation angle, total-loss parameter, total-loss performance of a single-stage, axial-flow transonic
coefficient, diffusion factor, adiabatic efficiency, total- compressor that is representative of an inlet stage of an
temperature ratio, and total-pressure ratio are plotted as advanced-core compressor. This is one of a series of
functions of suction-surface incidence angle in figure 10. stages designed to investigate the effects of aspect ratio
At design speed all the rotor blade elements operated over and pressure ratio on the performance characteristics.
a very narrow incidence angle range (less than 1.5’). The rotor and stator aspect ratios are 1.63 and 1.77,
Except at 5 percent of span the minimum loss occurred at respectively. The stage was designed for a pressure ratio
lower than design incidence angles. Except in the tip of 2.05 at a flow of 20.2 kilograms per second and a tip
region (5, 10, and 15 percent of span), compressor stall speed of 455 meters per second. Detailed radial surveys of
occurred before the design incidence was encountered. the flow conditions were made over the stable operating
The minimum losses were less than the design values at 5, range at speeds from 50 to 100 percent of design. This
10, 15, and 30 percent of span. At the other locations the investigation yielded the following results:
minimum losses were greater than the design values. 1 . At design speed the peak stage efficiency of 0.831
Stator.-Meridional velocity ratio, inlet Mach occurred near the stall flow of 20.4 kilograms per second.
number, deviation angle, total-loss parameter, total-loss The pressure ratio was 1.944.
coefficent, and diffusion factor are plotted as functions 2. The rotor peak efficiency of 0.849 occurred near the
of suction-surface angle in figure 11. The upper range of minimum flow condition. The rotor pressure ratio was
incidence over which the stator operated was limited by 1.969.
rotor stall. Except at 5 percent of span the stator operated 3. The rotor and stator are not well matched, especially
at incidence angles less than the design value. At 5 in the region from the tip to 30 percent of span. Most of
percent of span the stator incidence angle at compressor the rotor elements have minimum losses at the maximum
stall was equal to the design value. flow conditions, but the stator appears to have minimum
At 5, 30, and 50 percent of span the incidence angle losses near the minimum flow conditions.
corresponding to minimum possible loss was not
encountered. For the other span locations, minimum
losses occurred at incidence less than the design. Except Lewis Research Center
for 5 and 10 percent of span, the measured losses were National Aeronautics and Space Administration
less than the design losses. Cleveland, Ohio, August 13, 1981.
5
Appendix B
Equations
Diffusion factor:
(B5)
Profile-loss coefficient:
Total-loss parameter:
J cos (oh)TE
2a
Profile-loss parameter:
6
I
NR
(P z / P 1 ) ( Y - 1 ) / Y- 1
lad =
(T2/T1)- 1
Head-rise coefficient:
(B 14)
Equivalent airflow:
WIG
-
6
Wfi
-
6
47"
Stall margin:
SM=
I, .I, I
,. ,, .
,, , ,, ..,_,. .
, , ,,,. .,. ,.- .1,.1 . .
I
.. I II
.. I -I.#...----- ---.. --.
Appendix C
Definitions and Units of Abbreviations Used in Tables
9
VEL velocity, m/sec zoc axial distance from inlet hub
ZI axial distance from inlet hub to blade trailing edge, cm
to blade leading edge, cm ZTC axial distance from inlet hub
ZMC axial distance from inlet hub to transition point, cm
to blade maximum thickness
point, cm
10
References
1. Reid. Lonnie; and Moore, Royce D.: Design and Overall 4. Moore, Royce D.; and Reid, Lonnie: Performance of Single-Stage
Performance of Four Highly Loaded, High Speed Inlet Stages for Axial-Flow Transonic Compressor with Rotor and Stator Aspect
an Ad\ anced High-Pressure-Ratio Core Compressor. NASA Ratios of 1.19 and 1.26, Respectively, and with Design Pressure
TP-1337, 1978. Ratio of 2.05. NASA TP-1659, 1980.
2. Reid, Lonnie; and Moore, Royce D.: Experimental Study of Low 5 . Moore, Royce D.; and Reid, Lonnie: Performance of Single-Stage
Aspect Ratio Compressor Blading. J. Eng. Power, vol. 102, no. 4, Axial-Flow Transonic Compressor with Rotor and Stator Aspect
OCt. 1980, pp. 875-882. (NASA TM-79280, 1979.) Ratios of 1.63 and 1.78, Respectively, and with Design Pressure
3. Reid, Lonnie; and Moore, Royce D.: Performance of Single-Stage Ratio of 1.82. NASA TP-1974, 1981.
Axial-Flow Transonic Compressor with Rotor and Stator Aspect 6. Urasek, Donald C.; and Janetzke, David C.: Performance of
Ratios of 1.19 and 1.26, Respectively, and with Design Pressure Tandem-Bladed Transonic Compressor Rotor with Rotor Tip
Ratio of 1.82. NASA TP-1338, 1978. Speed of 1375 Feet Per Second. NASA TM X-2484, 1972.
......
........... 198.877
20.188
RPn ................................ .... 17188.700
T I P SPEED
H U B - T I P RADIUS RATIO.
ROTOR ASPECT RATIO
.....................455.096
.70
1.63
STATOR ASPECT RATIO
NUHBER OF ROTOR BLADES
................ ....... 48.0
1.77
NUHEER OF STATOR BLADES ............ ....... 62.0
11
I
12
TABLE 11.-Concluded. DESIGN BLADE-ELEMENT PARAMETERS
(b) Stator 38
RP PERCENT
SPAN IMCIDEMCE
HEAN SS OEV D-FACT EFF LOSS
TOT COEFF
PROF TOT P
LOSS
TIP -00 4.2 -3.2 9.4 -566 .OOO -063 -063 -024
1 5.00 4.4 -2.9 9.4 -558 -000 -091 -091 -034
2 10.00 4.4 -2.8 9.3 -548 -000 .087 .087 -033
3 15.00 4.4 -2.7 9.2 .541 -000 -084 -084 -031
4 30.00 4.5 -2.1 9.0 -532 .OOO -080 .080 .029
5 50.00 4.7 -1.3 8.9 .535 -000 -082 -082 ,029
6 70.00 4.7 -.7 8.9 .545 .OOO -087 .087 .030
7 85.00 5.4 .4 9.1 -561 .OOO .094 .094 .032
8 90.00 5.6 .8 9.2 .567 .OOO .098 .098 .032
9 95.00 5.1 .3 9.2 -574 .OOO -103 -103 -034
HUE 100.00 4.5 -.2 9.3 -581 .OOO .lo7 .lo7 .035
13
TABLE 111.-BLADE GEOMETRY
(a) Rotor 38
14
TABLE 111.-Concluded. BLADE GEOMETRY
(b) Stator 38
PERCENT RADII BLADE ANGLES DELTA CONE
RP SPAN RI RO KIC KTC KOC I NC ANGLE
TIP 0. 24 -397 23.983 44.98 27.05 1.67 7.46 -8.087
1 5 . 24.136 23.882 44.50 27.09 1.75 7 -32 -4-998
2 10. 23 -881 23 -655 44.10 27.15 1.93 7.19 -4.455
3 15. 23.617 23.421 43.86 27.23 2.09 7.05 -3 -894
4 30. 22 -789 22.689 43.59 27.57 2.60 6.60 -2.022
5 5 0 . 21.645 21.676 43.93 28.33 3.23 6.02 .648
6 7 0 . 20.477 20.646 44.32 29.30 3.92 5.46 3 -609
7 8 5 . 19.587 19.856 44.52 30.02 4.31 5.02 5.857
8 9 0 . 19.287 19.589 44.62 30.39 4.45 4.88 6.647
9 9 5 . 18.983 19.320 45.46 31.27 4.63 4.76 7.481
HUB 100. 18.682 19.032 46-40 32.22 4.a1 4.64 7 .890
BLADE THICKNESSES
RP TI Tti TO
TIP .026 .241 .025
1 -025 .236 -025
2 -025 .232 .025
3 -025 .227 -025
4 -025 .213 .025
5 -024 -195 .024
6 -024 .177 .024
7 -023 .164 .023
8 .a23 .159 -023
9 -023 .155 -023
HUB -023 .151 -023
TURN CHOKE
RP RATE PHISS HARGIN
TIP 1.005 24.08
1 -218
1 -994 23.37 -216
2 -984 22.74 -214
3 -976, 22.25 -212
4 -961 21.14 -212
5 -939' 20.16 .210
6 -905I 19.07 -197
7 -8601 18.46 -189
8 -836i 18.16 .186
9 -811 17.81 -183
HUB -785i 17.46 .180
15
TABLE 1V.-OVERALL PERFORMANCE FOR STAGE 38
~
4129 I
I
4128 4123
~
.-
4121
~~ -
4120
~-
~~
4119
~
- ~
1.799
t .YE0
1.217
1.000
0.842
I
I
1 .E46
0 -984
1.226
1.000
0.847
1 .E58
0 -985
1.228
1.000
0 -847
1.912
0 -986
1.240
1.000
0 .E48
I .969
0 -987
1.252
1.000
0 .849
2.004
0 -987
1.259
1.000
0.848
0 -839 0 .844 0 -845 0.846 0 -845 0 .847
0.310 8 -327 0.333 0 -351 0.372 0 -386
0.409 0 -408 0 -407 0 -405 0.400 0 -394
104.41 104.13 104.11 103.75 102.91 101 - 8 0
206.57 206.00 205 - 9 6 205.25 203.60 201 - 4 0
A I R F L O W AT O R I F I C E ... .- . ..- - 20.97 20 - 9 1 20 - 9 1 20 - 8 3 20.67 20.44
A I R F L O W AT ROTOR I N L E T . .. . - .- - 20 -97 20.93 20.89 20.83 20 - 6 5 20 - 4 3
- . - . . - -
A I R F L O W A T ROTOR O U T L E T . 20198 I 20.92 20.92 20.85 20 - 6 8 20 - 4 6
.. - .
A I R F L n W A T S T A T O- R O
R O T A T i V E SPEED
P E R C E N T OF DESIGN
.
- UTLET
. . . . - . . -
... ..- -
SPEED.
21 - 1 0
,7223.9
100.2 I
I
21 - 0 1
17226.8
100.2
20 - 9 4
17185.7
100.0
20 - 9 1
17221 - 7
100.2
20.81
17227- 9
100.2
20 - 6 4
17205.9
100.1
Compressor performance
STAGE T O T A L PRESSURE R A T I O
S T A G E T O T A L TEMPERATURE R A T i O :
STAGE A D I A B A T I C E F F I C I E N C Y - ..-
:::1
- .
I 1.763
1.218
0.809
I 1 .816
1.226
0 .a21
I 1 .829
1.229
0 .823
~~ ~
1.885
1.240
0 -827
1.944
1.252
0.831
~- ~
I ~
1.977
1.259
0 -831
~~ ~~
- ~ ~~
Parameters Reading
I Compressor performance
STAGE T O T A L PRESSURE R A T I O . .. . - 1.617 1.670 1.710 I .746 1.761
STAGE T O T A L TEflPERATURE R A T i O .
STAGE A D I A B A T I C E F F I C I E N C Y - . -. .. .. -- 1.173
0.851
1.182
0 -867
1.189
0 -877
1.197
0 -877
1.201
0 .872
16
TABLE 1V.-Continued. OVERALL PERFORMANCE FOR STAGE 38
(c) 80 Percent of design speed
Parameters Reading
Compressor performance
_ _ _____-- ~
STAGE T O T A L PRESSURE R A T I O
STAGE T O T A L TEHPERATURE R A T I O .
STAGE A d I A B A T I C E F F I C I E N C Y 0 -887
Reading
4098 4099
.
4100 -1
--I--
4101 4095
ROTOR T O T A L P R E S S U R E R A T I O
STATOR T O T A L PRESSURE R A T I O .
. .. 1.333
0.974
1.360
0 -986
I .381
0 -990
1.396
0.992
1.410
0.993
1.42%
0.993
ROTOR T O T A L T E H P E R A T U R E R A T I O . 1.090 1.098 1.104 1.109 1.114 1.120
STATOR TOTAL TEHPERATURE R A T I O 1. o o e 1.ooo 1.000 1.ooo 1.000 1.ooo
ROTOR A D I A B A T I C E F F I C I E N C Y 0 -949 0 -937 0 -926 0.915 __
0- -.9 0 3 0.876
R O T O R HUMENTUN-RISE EFFICIE~C~ 0 -951 0 -935 0.927 0.914 0.903 0.874
ROTOR H E A D - R I S E C O E F F I C I E N T . . 0 -267 0.289 0.306
0.391
0.318
0.381
6.329 0.338
FLOU COEFFICIENT. 0 -416 0 -404 0.368 0.350
AIRFLOW P E R UNIT F R ~ N ~AREA: A ~ 80 - 3 9 78.14 76 - 0 2 74 -29 72.21 68 -96
A I R F L O U PER U N I T A h N U L U S AREA. 159.05 154.60 150.20 146.98 142.85 136.44
A I R F L O W AT O R I F I C E ...- 16.14 15.69 15.27 14.92 14-50 13.85
-.. -. ..-
AIRFLOW A T XITOR .
I N ~ E ~ . 16.11 15.66 15 - 2 4 14.89 14.46 13.81
1
A I R F L O W AT ROTOR O U T L E T . 16.15 15.70 15.27 i4.92 i4:iii 13. 8 5
A I R F L O W AT S T A T O R O U T L E T 16.12 15.55 15.08 14.71 14.27 13.59
R O T A T i V E SPEED I . - - - . 12026.2 12003.6 11999- 4 12002.6 12005.1 12014.2
PERCENT OF DESIGN SPEED. . - . 70 . O 69.8 69.8
-~ . -
69 a 69.8 69.9
-1 I 1 1..85T==
Compressor performance
~. _-
. - __
STAGE T O T A L PRESSURE R A T I O
.. . - . 1-y 1.098
1-341-/-,.3671 .I05 1.109 1.114 1.120
STAGE T O T A L TEHPERATURE R A l i O .
STAGE A D I A B A T I C E F F I C I E N C Y . . .- - . 1.090
0.857 0 .E92 0 -895 0 .892 0 -884 0 -859
_
17
I
FOR STAGE 38
Parameters Readini
4104
~~
ROTOR T O T A L P R E S S U R E R A T I V " .
S T A T O R T O T A L P R E S S U R E RAT,,. .. .. .. .. -. 01 .-391924
... .
- . . . 11 ..ooo 093
ROTOR T O T A L T E f l P E R A T U R E R A T I O .
STATOR TOTAL TEflPERATURE R A T I O
ROTQR A D I A B A T I C E F F I C I E N C Y
EFFICIENC~
.- -. -. -. 0 . 8 7 0
- - - - - 00 .-836292
R O T C R NOHENTUM-RISE
R O T O R H E A D - R I S E COEFFICIENT.
FLOU COEFFICIENT. . - . . . 0 -328
A I R F L O U P i ? ? N I T F R o N i A i AREA. . .- - 58 -49
A I R F L O W PER U N I T A N N U L U S A R E A .. - - . 115.71
AIRFLOU AT OR I F I C E - - .. . - - - -
- 11 - 7 5
A I R F L o U A T ROTOR I N L E T .. ..- .- - 11 - 6 6
A I R F L O W A T ROTOR O U T L E T . . - . . - - - 11 - 7 5
A I R F L O U A T STATOR O U T L E T
R O T A T I V E SPEED - .
- . - . - - . 1 1_. 6 0
. . . _ - _ _0621 -2
P E R C E N T OF D E S I G N S;EED. . ....-
- 61 - 8
- _ _
Compressor performance
$ T A G � T O T A L PRESSURE R A T I O
;TAG� T O T A L TEIIPERATURE
1.304 - .. -. .
RATIO.1 . 0 9 3
STAGE A D I A B A T I C E F F I C I E N C Y - - - - - -
0 .E51
Parameters Reading
4102
ROTOR T O T A L P R E S S U R E R A T I O - - 1.194
STATOR TOTAL PaESSURE R A T I O : 0.996
ROTOR T O T A L T E f l P E R A T U R E R A T I O . 1.059
STATOR T O T A L TEHPERATURE R A T I O 1.000
ROTOR A D I A B A T I C E F F I C I E N C Y . 0.878
c
~
RO TO R fl0 t i E T U H I R S E E F F I IC N C i 0 .879
ROTOR H E A D - R I S E C O E F F I C I E N T .
FLOU COEFFICIENT.
- 0.310
0.317
AIRFLOW PER UNIT F R I ~ N ~ A ~ AREA: 46 - 2 8
A I R F L O U PER U N I T ANNULUS AREA. 91 - 5 5
A I R F L O U A T O R I F I C E - - -. -. -. _ 9 -29
AIRFLOW A T ROTOR-iNLET - .. 9.21
.. .. .
A I R F L O U A T ROTOR O U T L E T . 9 -29
AIRFLOW A T STATOR OUTLET 9.16
R O T A T I V E SPEED
PERCENT OF DESIGN
. SPEED.
.-..
. . 8562 7 -
49.8
~~ ~~ -~ -~
Compressor performance
.- - -
I
S T A G E T O T A L PRESSURE R A T I O 1.189
. . .- -- .. ..
STAGE T O T A L TEflPERATURE R A T i O . 1.059
STAGE A D I A B A T I C E F F I C I E N C Y 0.858
18
TABLE V.-BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR ROTOR 38-SI UNITS
(a) 50 Percent of design speed; reading 4102
19
TABLE V.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR ROTOR 38-SI UNITS
(b) 60 Percent of design speed; reading 4104
6 20.236 20.417 -0.0 43.0 64.1 42.5 287.8 1.090 10.14 -326
7 19.020 19.482 0.0 43 - 4 63.2 35.8 287.7 1.0.93 10.14 1, -342
8 18.593 19.172 0 .o 43.9 63.1 32.9 288.0 1.094 10.14 1 -349
9 18.151 18.859 0.0 47.1 63.5 28.0 287.8 1.101 10.11 1 -363
20
i
TABLE V.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR ROTOR 38-SI UNITS
(c) 70 Percent of design speed; reading 4095
RAD1
~.~I ABS BETAN REL B E T A H TOTAL TEHP TOTAL P R E S S
RP IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN RATIO IN RATIO
1 24 -978 24 - 4 6 0 0.0 47.4 73.0 60.0 289.0 1.125 9.99 1.395
2 24.641 24.148 0.0 47.6 70.0 58.4 288.5 1.128 10.13 1.381
3 24 - 2 9 8 23 -838 0.0 47.9 69.0 57.0 288.1 1.130 10.14 1.383
4 23.231 22.903 0.0 44.5 66.6 53.4 288.7 1.120 10.14 1.411
5 21.763 ZI - 6 5 9 0.0 42.7 64.3 48.6 288.2 i.115 io.i4 1.415
6 20 - 2 3 6 20 - 4 1 7 -0.0 43.9 62.6 42.7 287.9 1-116 10.14 1.425
7 1 9 -020 19 -482 0.0 44.5 61.9 55-9 287.7 1.120 10.14 1.452
8 18.593 i9.172 0.0 45.3 61.8 32.5 287.4 1.124 10.14 1.464
9 18.151 18.859 0.0 46.6 62.4 28-1 287.7 1.130 10.10 1.484
21
TABLE V.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR ROTOR 38-SI UNITS
(d) 70 Percent of design speed; reading 4101
22
TABLE V.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR ROTOR 38-SI UNITS
(e) 70 Percent of design speed; reading 4100
23
TABLE V.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR ROTOR 38-SI UNITS
(f) 70 Percent of design speed; reading 4099
24
TABLE V.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR ROTOR 38-SI UNITS
(g) 70 Percent of design speed; reading 4098
25
TABLE V.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR ROTOR 38-SI UNITS
(h) 70 Percent of design speed; reading 4097
26
TABLE V.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR ROTOR 38- -SIUNITS
(i) 80 Percent of design speed; reading 4093
R A D~-
II ABS BETAfl REL BETAH TOTAL TEMP TOTAL P R E S S
RP IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN RATiu IN RATIO
1 24.978 24.460 0.0 47.8 70.9 61.2 289.9 1.159 9.93 1.524
2 24.641 24.148 0.0 46.5 68.1 59.1 289.5 1.160 10.11 1.513
3 24.298 23.838 0.0 44.6 67.2 57.5 289.8 1.155 10.12 1.524
4 23.231 22.903 0.0 41.8 64.7 52.9 288.8 1.151 1 8 - 1 4 1.565
5 21.763 21.659 0.0 42.5 61.9 47.2 287.8 1.154 10.15 1.588
6 20.235 20.417 0.0 43.3 60.0 42.2 287.4 1 .is0 10.15 1.600
7 19.020 19.482 0.0 44.3 59.2 36.9 287.1 1.154 10.15 1.603
8 18.593 19.172 0.0 4573 59.2 33.6 287.0 1.159 10.15 1.619
9 18.151 18.859 0.0 44.8 58.8 31-5 287.0 1.158 10.15 1.619
21
TABLE V.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR ROTOR 38-SI UNITS
6 ) 90 Percent of design speed; reading 4131
29
TABLE V.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR ROTOR 38-SI UNITS
(I9
)0 Percent of design speed; reading 4133
30
TABLE V.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR ROTOR 38-SI UNITS
(m) 90 Percent of design speed; reading 4139
31
TABLE V.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR ROTOR 38-SI UNITS
(n) 90 Percent of design speed; reading 4140
_I. .
RAD1 ABS BETAM REL BETAH TOTAL TEHP TOTAL PRESS
RP IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN RATIO IN RATIO
1 24.978 24.460 -0.0 42.3 68.7 64.0 288.7 1.165 9.83 1.529
2 24.641 24.148 0.0 38.9 65.3 60.7 288.3 1.164 10.13 1.539
3 24 - 2 9 8 23 - 8 3 8 -0.0 36.5 64.3 58.4 288.6 1.161 10.1 4 1 - 5 7 4
4 23.231 22.903 -0.0 35.3 61.7 53.7 288.6 1.164 10.1 3 1.629
5 2 1 -763 2 1 -659 -0.0 38.1 59.1 48.2 287.9 1.175 10.1 5 1.677
6 20 - 2 3 6 20 - 4 1 7 0.0 39.6 57.4 42.7 288.1 1.178 10.1 6 1.709
7 19.020 19.482 0.0 40.9 56.7 38.0 287.6 1.180 10.1 6 1.702
8 18.593 19.172 0.0 41.7 56.7 35.9 287.6 11.184 110.11 6 1.783
9 18.151 18.859 0.0 43.9 57.2 32.7 287.9 1.193 10.1 0 1.710
32
TABLE V.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR ROTOR 38-SI UNITS
(0) 100 Percent of design speed; reading 4119
33
TABLE V.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR ROTOR 38-SI UNITS
(p) 100 Percent of design speed; reading 4120
34
TABLE V.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR ROTOR 38-SI UNITS
(4)100 Percent of design speed; reading 4121
35
TABLE V.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR ROTOR 38-SI UNITS
(r) 100 Percent of design speed; reading 4123
ABS VEL REL VEL flERID VEL TANG VEL UHEEL SPEED
RP IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT
1 171.7 202.6 480.7 320.7 171.7 136.6 0.0 149.6 449.0 439.7
2 200.3 216.3 486.8 318.4 200.3 151.3 0.0 154.6 443.6 434.8
3 207.2 222.9 483.6 323.0 207.2 164.3 0.0 150.7 437.0 428.7
4 224.6 237.1 474.8 315.5 224.6 180.5 0.0 153.7 418.3 412.4
5 233.0 247.3 455.5 285.4 233.0 180.8 0.0 168.7 391.4 389.6
6 230.7 265.6 431.2 262.9 230.7 189.9 0.0 185.7 364.3 367.5
7 221.5 279.9 407.9 256.3 221.5 202.3 0.0 193.4 342.5 350.9
8 216.3 285.8 398.5 253.4 216.3 206.3 0.0 197.8 334.6 345-1
9 206.1 296.2 386.3 244.3 206.1 207.8 0.0 211.0 326.7 339.5
36
TABLE V.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR ROTOR 3 8 - 3 UNITS
(s) 100 Percent of design speed; reading 4128
37
TABLE V.-Concluded. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR ROTOR 38-SI UNITS
(t) 100 Percent of design speed; reading 4129
38
c
TABLE VI.-BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR STATOR 38-SI UNITS
(a) 50 Percent of design speed; reading 4102
39
TABLE VI.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR STATOR 38-SI UNITS
(b) 60 Percent of design speed; reading 4104
TABLE VI.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR STATOR 38-SI UNITS
(c) 70 Percent of design speed; reading 4095
41
TABLE VI.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR STATOR 38-SI UNITS
(d) 70 Percent of design speed; reading 4101
42
TABLE VI.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR STATOR 38-SI UNITS
(e) 70 Percent of design speed; reading 4100
ABS YACH NO
~~ REL MACH NO M E R I D MACH NO H E R I D PEAK SS
RP IN -OUT- IN OUT- IN OUT VEL R HACH NO
1 0.491 0.377 0.491 0.377 0,389 0.362 0.941 0 . 6 96
2 0.507 0.405 0.507 0.405 0.401 0.394 0.992 0.718
3 0.518 0.434 0.518 0.434 0.415 0.423 i.028 0.7I4
4 0.539 0.480 0.539 0.480 0.444 0.472 1.069 0.690
5 0.559 0.500 0.559 0.500 0.454 0.493 1.092 0.721
6 0.578 0.512 0.578 0.512 0.459 0.504 1.105 0.763
7 0.600 0.523 0.600 0.523 0.464 0.514 1.117 0.825
8 0I614 0.534 0.614 0.534 0.465 0.523 1.136 0.872
9 0.636 0.541 0.636 0.541 0.462 0.526 1.150 0.935
43
TABLE VI.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR STATOR 38-SI UNITS
(fJ 70 Percent of design speed; reading 4099
44
I
TABLE VI.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR STATOR 38-SI UNITS
(g) 70 Percent of design speed; reading 4098
45
TABLE VI.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR STATOR 38-SI UNITS
(h) 70 Percent of design speed; reading 4097
ABS H A C H NO REL H A C H NO H E R I D H A C H NO H E R I D P E A K SS
RP I)( OUT IN OUT IN OUT VEL R H A C H NO
1 0.47 1 0.464 0.471 0.464 0.412 0.446 1.082 U.199
2 0.51 4 0.521 0.514 0.521 0.462 C.5C8 1.098 0.514
3 0.540 0.559 0.540 0.559 0.484 0.548 1.131 0-540
4 0.563 0.602 0.563 0.602 0.507 0.593 1.164 0.563
5 0.587 0.627 0.587 0.627 0.520 0.617 1.180 0.587
6 0.601 0.643 0.601 0.643 0.520 0.632 1.209 0.601
7 0.631 0.653 0.631 0.653 0.530 0.640 1.204 0.707
8 0.643 0.664 0.643 0.664 0.534 0.649 1.212 0.743
9 0.658 0.667 0.658 0.667 0.521 0.647 1.240 0.832
46
TABLE VI.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR STATOR 38-SI UNITS
(i) 80 Percent of design speed; reading 4093
ABS VEL REL VEL HERID VEL TANG VEL WHEEL SPEED
RP IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT INOUT IN OUT
1 198.5 140.6 198.5 140.6 146.2 135.2 134.3 38.4 0.0 0.0
2 202.2 148.8 20272 148.8 150.0 144.4 135.6 36.0 0 .u 0-0
3 204.4 157.1 204.4 157.1 154.6 153.1 133.7 35.2 0.0 0.0
4 213.0 176.0 213.0 176.0 165.8 173.1 133.7 31.8 0 .o 0 .o
5 222.7 183.5 222.7 183.5 170.7 180.5 143.1 32.7 0.0 0-0
6 226.7 187.7 226.7 187.7 170.8 184.8 149.1 33.0 0.0 0.0
7 232.7 188.1 232.7 188.1 171.3 185.1 157.4 33-1 0 .o 0-0
8 238.5 190.4 238.5 190.4 171.7 186.8 165.6 36.9 0 .o 0 -0
9 240.1 190.0 240.1 190.0 172.6 186.4 167.0 36.9 0.0 0.0
41
TABLE VI.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR STATOR 38-SI UNITS
(i) 50 Percent of design speed; reading 4131
48
I
TABLE VI.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR STATOR 38-SI UNITS
(k) 90 Percent of design speed; reading 4132
49
I
TABLE VI.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR STATOR 38-SI UNITS
(I9
)0 Percent of design speed; reading 4133
50
1
TABLE VI.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR STATOR 38-SI UNITS
(m) 90 Percent of design speed; reading 4139
51
TABLE VI.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR STATOR 38-SI UNITS
(n) 90 Percent of design speed; reading 4140
RAD II
~~ ABS BETAH REL BETAfl TOTAL TEHP TOTAL P R E S S
RP IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN RAT IO IN RATIO
1 24.135 23.881 36.9 17.0 36.9 17.0 336.4 1.000 15.03 0 -958
2 23.881 23.655 34.4 12.9 34.4 12.9 335.6 1.ooo 15 - 5 9 0 - 9 6 9
3 23.617 23.421 32.6 11.3 32.6 11 - 3 335.1 1.000 15.96 0 -986
4 22.789 2 2 - 6 9 0 32.6 10.8 32.6 10.8 335.9 1.000 16.50 0 -980
5 2 1 -646 21 -676 35.3 11.3 35 - 3 11 -3 338 - 4 1. o o o 17.03 0 -975
6 20.477 20.645 37.2 11.4 37 - 2 11 :4 339 - 4 1.000 17.36 0 -977
7 19.588 19.855 39.1 11- 1 39.1 11 - 1 339 - 3 1.000 17.29 0 -975
8 19.286 19.588 40.3 11.3 40.3 11 -3 340.4 1.000 17.30 0 -978
9 18.984 19.319 43.2 12.5 43.2 12.5 3 4 3 -5 1. o o o 17 - 2 7 0 - 9 6 9
52
I
TABLE VI.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR STATOR 38-SI UNITS
(0) 100 Percent of design speed; reading 4119
53
I
TABLE VI.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR STATOR 38-SI UNITS
(p) 100 Percent of design speed; reading 4120
ABS flACH NO
~~ REL HACH NO f l E R I D HACH NO f l E R I D PEAK SS
RP IN OUT IN OUT- IN -OUT VEL R flACH NO
1 0.655 0.414 0.655 0.414 0.450 0.398 0.905 1.129
2 0.673 0.445 0.673 0.445 0.470 0.430 0.935 1.135
3 0.688 0.478 0.688 0.478 0.495 0.463 0.958 1.115
4 0.718 0.537 0.718 0.537 0.533 0.524 1.003 i.io3
5 0.741 0.553 0.741 0.553 0.534 0.541 1.036 1.166
6 0.788 0.588 0.788 0.588 0.553 0.573 1.061 1.255
7 0.804 0.590 0.804 0.590 0.569 0.577 1.043 1.260
8 0.814 0.591 0.814 0.591 0.564 0.578 1 .055 1.302
9 0.823 0.584 0.823 0.584 0.550 0.569 1.066 1.339
54
r
TABLE VI.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR STATOR 38-SI UNITS
(q) 100 Percent of design speed; reading 4121
56
TABLE VI.-Continued. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR STATOR 38-SI UNITS
(s) 100 Percent of design speed; reading 4128
51
TABLE VI.-Concluded. BLADE-ELEMENT DATA AT BLADE EDGES FOR STATOR 3 8 4 3 UNITS
(t) 100 Percent of design speed; reading 4129
A B S H A C H NO REL H A C H NO H E R I D H A C H NO H E R I D P E A K SS
RP IN 0U T IN OUT IN OUT VEL R H A C H NO
1 0.617 0.484 0.617 0 -484 0.480 0.464 0.979 0.902
2 0.663 0.528 0 -663 0.528 0.532 0.513 0.978 0.911
3 0.686 0.568 0 -686 0 -568 0.559 0.555 1.007 0.909
4 0.709 0.627 0 -709 0 -627 0.577 0.615 1.077 0.930
5 0.728 0.641 0.728 0 -641 0.572 0.629 1.112 1-005
6 0.773 0.678 0 -773 0 -678 0.594 0.663 1.131 1.082
7 0.813 0.692 0 -813 0 -692 0.621 0.679 1.111 1.143
8 0.825 0.690 0 -825 0.690 0.626 0.677 1.101 1.164
9 0.845 0.679 0.845 0 -679 C 619 0.663 1.096 1.226
58
Flow path cwrdinates
Inner Outer
Station: 1
I - I ll I
E M
U
vi
.-
U
3
B 10
0
-20 -10 0 10
Axial distance from rotor blade hub
leading edge, cm
a lnstrumentation survey planes.
c-77-675;
(a) Rotor (b) Stator
Figure 2. ' Stage blade rows.
59
Inlet throttle valves
Flow
Vacuum
- - - - -- 7 y - J - - d I r-----
A Combination probe
Wedge probe
a Static pressure tap
Station 1 Station 3
61
Id
L
w
Y
uc
e
m
c
I
0
e
-0
D-
c
PERCENT
DES I GN
a SPEED
w
a
a
c
1 .z
D
a
c
0
D-
I .0
w
w
a
a
A
c
D
c
0
EOUIVALENT T O T A L AIRFLONm K W f E C
62
*
-z
rJ
z
W
V n cf
Y
Y
-
W
rJ
m
e
-
m
c
0
c
-
0
m-
c
a
l.+
PERCENl
DESIGN
SPEED
W
a v 58
a
I-
a 68
c 1.2 n 78
a
W D 88
n 0 38
E
c
W 0 180
A 0 OESIGN
c
m
c
0
1.0 --- STALL LINE
2.2
2.8
0
I-
C
a 1.8
W
a
a
ul
ul 1-6
W
n
a
-I 1 .z
c
0
I
1.2
1.0
EOUIVALENT T O T A L A I R F L O H B KG/SEC
63
0
W
0
ww
0-l
cm
(Lz
OC
3
Y)W
0
zz
O W
-0
I-
00
3z
m
1 .z
0
I
I- EOUIVALENI
C AIRFLOHD
a 1.1 KWSEC
-
>
I
0
0
1.a
0 21.0
o 2B.7
W
4 P 2B.+
>
A 8.9 0 DESIGN
C
--
z
0
0 0.8
a
W
E
8.7
.
W
0
W
4
0
z
C
-
0
z
-
+
c
>
w
0
- 0 68 1 88
Figure8. - Radial distribution of performance for rotor 38. 100 Percent of design speed.
64
.ab
a
W
8-
W
X
c .0+
c
0
a
rn
UI
0
2
.82
-I
e-c
0
?-
.BB
--
c EOUIVALI
;L
W AIRFLOH
0
KSAEC
L
L 0 21.0
0
W 0 28.7
a n 26.+
rn
(L1
0
0 OESIGN
-I
-I
a-c
c
0
a
0
c
LJ
Lc
z
2
In
a
-
Y
L
0
Figure 8. - Continued. Radial distribution of performance for rotor 38. 100 Percent of design speed.
65
1 .a
>
u
--
z
W
0
Y
W
-
0
b
c
0.8
-
m
c
n
c
0.6
.+
-
0
a
c
1
EQUIVALENl
A I RFLOII.
KWSEC
a
W
a
o 21.8
3 o 213.7
c A 28.+
c
0 1.2
W 0 OESIGW
a
S
c
W
A
c
8-
0
D
1.0
2.2
-
O
c
c
2.0
a 1 .e
W
a
3
v)
v) 1.6
W
a
n
a
c
I-
1 .+
a
O
1 .2
1.0
8 28 48 68 88 I 88
Figure& - Concluded. Radial distribution of performance for rotor 38. 100 Percent of design speed.
66
U
c
W
w
S
U
c
n
In
2
2
.3
c EQUIVALENT
z AIRFLOYm
w KGAEC
.2 0 2I.B
0 20.7
P 2B.+
ua DESIGN
In
0
2 .1
-I
c
c
0
.0
Q
c
0
c
0
L
Figure 9. - Radial distribution of performance for stator 38. 100 Percent of design speed.
67
-
0
W
0
ww
V A
ca
U Z
ac
3
u)W
0
fZ
o w
-0
c
oo
'32
v)
0
I
* EOUIVALENT
c A IRFLOYD
a KG/SEC
-
>
I-
0
a 21.0
0 20.7
0
-1 P 28.+
W
>
A
0 DESIGN
c
-e
Z
0
a
W
X
15
Q
W
-
W
0
-1 10
Q
f
c
-
0
a!
-
c
c
>
W
5
-
8 28 +B 68 88 I 08
Figure 9. - Concluded. Radial distribution of performance for stator 38. 100 Percent of design speed.
68
-
0
c
c
1.2
a 1.1
*
c
I
0
0
1 .n
2
w
>
2 n. v
z
-!?
c
0
n. 8
a
W
S
n. 7
1.6
PERCENT
z
0
. OES16N
SPEED
S
0
c
x I.+ I o 70
9n
108
I
o
-
w
>
c
c
DESIGN
3
W
a 1.2
c
-
w
-
xI
1 .n
15
0
W
0
W
2
. in
a
z
c
4
-
c
c
W
5
W
0
0
-+ E +
69
-86
a
c
W
W
t
c .8+ 0
a
c
a
u)
u)
0
t
-I
-I .82
*
c
0
I-
PERCENT
DESIGN
* SPEED
--
z
W
0
0
o
78
90
LL o 180
Y
w
0
u
DESIGN
u)
u)
0
4
4
c
I
c
O
a
I
-
0
I
0
c
Y 0
-
z
0
u)
3
-
Y
Y
-+ 8 0
70
1 .E
>
u
z
-
!
0
LL
Y
W
8.8
u
I-
C
m
c
0
c
0. h
1 .+
-
0
I-
C
PERCENT
D E S 1G N
SPEED
a
W
o 70
a 90
s3
- 0 I08
c
a 1.2 DESIGN
W
n
S
W
I
2
c
I-
0
I
1 .E
2.2
2.8
o
I
c
a 1 .a
W
a
3
u)
UI 1.6
a
W
n
A 1.1
c
I-
O
I-
I .z
1 .a
n 8
71
111I I Illlll I I I
8.9
8.7
1.6
0.8 E n
PERCENJ
O E S I GW
SPEED
78
1 .+ 0
90
180
0 DESIGN
1.2
I .0
I5 I
10
8
-? 0 ?
72
-
a
w
w
I:
c .E+
a
a
-I .E2
c
8
0
c
.Ea
.3 PERCENT
DESIGN
SPEEO
c
swc c
a 70
90
0 .2 0 100
L
L
w DESIGN
u
0
-* I
x
I
.+ I
0
ul
-
3 =6
L
.z
-+ E
13
>
--
V
z
W
Ca
L
u
a-
c
-
m
c
0
L
w 8.8
s
8.6
I.+
PERCENT
0 DESIGN
t
c SPEED
a
w n 78
0 u 9B
c
=I 0 188
<
0 1.2
a
W 0 DESIGN
E
W
c
-I
c
a-
0
.I..
-
0
8
c
a
W
a
a
In
II)
W
a
a
-I
c
a-
0
t
74
-
0
c
c
1.2
a 1.1
-
>
c
V
0
1.0
w
-1
>
-I
0.9
c
z
Q
-
CI
w
0
0.0
S
8.1
1.6 PERCENT
0
.
a!
DESIGN
SPEED
n 78
I
V 0 98
c
S 1.q 0 188
w 0 OESISW
>
a
c.
w
a 1 .z
c
-
U
-I
a!
1 .a
15
-.
w
0
w 10
0
.J
a!
<
-
a!
0
-
I-
c
W
5
I
B
f +
75
...
I I
0
W
D-
W
S
c
a
c
n
u)
u)
0
-I
-I
c
I
0
D-
PERCENT
OESIGN
I- SPEED
--
z
W
0
n
o
70
90
L
0 100
W
L
0
u 0 DESIGN
In
u)
0
-I
-I
c
I
c
0
n I
--
-? # ? a
76
1.0
>
0
-L
W
I
0
I
L
w
0
-
0
c
c
0.8
-
m
e
0
c
0.6
I.+ PERCENT
0
I
DESIGN
c SPEED
c
a
w
n 70
a o 90
D 0 100
I-
C
a 1.2 OESI6Y
W
n
X
c
W
-#
c
0
I-
1.0
.. .
2.2
0
. . ..
..
-
O
c
2.0
c
a I .B
w
a
a
ln
ln 1.6
W
u.
n
.A 1.9
c
8
0
8
1.2
..
1.0
I
?.
I-
-
0
C
1 .z
0 1.1 ' ~. -~
-
a->
0
0
1 .E
A Q
W
>
-I
c
0.9
* ~
-a-
z
0
W
S
0.7 '
1 .c
PERCENT
DESIGN
0 SPEED
z
S
0 CJ 78
a I .q 90
S 0 188
-*
W
>
m 0 DESIGN
C
A
W
a 1.2
8-
-
Y
A
z
1 .E
a
W
.
0
Y
_I
0
z
C
z
0
a
-
I-
C
>
W
__
0
-+ 0 + 8
78
-06
01
w
I-
Y
t
c .O+
c.
m
a
u)
0
-I
2
.02
c
I-
0
I-
.BE
.3 PERCENT
DESIGN
c
SPEED
--
z
w
O
c3 70
90
LL .2 o 180
LL
W
0
0 OESIGN
0
u)
0
u) a
2
.I
-I
c
c
0
I
-8
a
e
0
O -* I
I
E
LL
;L
*+ I
0
3
u)
IL
(L
.z
-?
I9
>
u
-
z
W
u
I
Y
L
w
-
0
e
<
m
-
c
0
c
1 .q
0 PERCENT
I
c
DESIGN
c SPEED
a
-
U
a
3
c
a
w
1.2
n
o
0
0
78
98
100
DESIGN
a
E
c
W
L3
2
c
0
8
1.0
2.2
-*
0
c
2.8
a 1 .E
W
a
3
UI
UI 1.6
w
a
a
2
c
I.?
e
0
c
1.2
1.0
-+ a ?
80
I .2
0
c
c
a 1.1
-
>
c
V
0 I .0
A
W
>
A 0.9
z
-a
c
0
0.8
a
W
E 0.7
-
PERCENT
.
z
0
D E S ISM
SPEED
n ?E
I
0 90
c I.+ o 108
E 0
-
W
>
c
c
DESIGN
W
-I
1
0 1.2
r
W
-
A
z
1.0
-
W
0
w
A
0
z
C
z
0
-
-
I
C
>
W
CI
"
-+ E +
81
a
W
I-
W
r
c
a
c
n
In
v)
0
2
-I
c
c
0
I-
PERCENl
DES I GW
D-
z
w
0
a
SPEED
70
90
LL
I
L 0 100
W
0
0 OESIGY
v)
v)
0
-I
-I
c
I-
O
#-
a
0
#
0
c
Y
22
-
v)
3
Y
Y
I
.z
-+ 0 + 0
82
I 1.0
>
--
0
z
W
u
U
U
W
-
u
I
c
8.8
-
m
c
0
C
8.6
1 .+
-
0
I-
C
PERCENT
DESIGN
SPEEO
a
0 70
W
a o 98
a o 188
I
c
a 1.2 DESIGN
W
n
E
W
D
-1
e
A
I-
O
I
I I
1 .B
2.2 ..
-
O
I
c
2.0
a 1 .a
W
a
a
v)
v) 1.6
W
9:
m.
2 1 .?
c
I
c
O
1.2
1 .a
-+ E ?
83
I Ill
-
0
I-
C
1.2
a 1.1
:
r
*
I-
I
0
0
I .B
2
W
>
-1 0.9
z
C
--
0
0 0.8
a
W
S
8.7
PERCENT
OESIGN
0 SPEED
t
x c3 70
0
c 90
S 0 100
-
W
>
#
c
0 OESIGN
-1
W
a
I-
W
-
-1
2
I5
W
W
0
W
2
. 18
W
t
c
-
z
0
-
I
c
>
W
5
B
-+ 0 +
a4
I
-06
Q
c
W
I
W
c .E9
a
c
0
u)
v)
0
-1
J .El
c
a-0
.Ea
-3
PERCENT
OES I G N
8- SPEED
-
2
W
La
n
o
70
90
I
U .z 0 100
L
W
0 0 DESIGN
u)
0
2
.I
J
c
I-
O
c
.E
a
e
Q
o
c
L
-
z
0
u)
a .+
---i
-
Y
U
a
85
1.a
>
u
--
z
*u
u
Y
P
W
-
u
I
c
0.8
en
c
0
c
8.6
1.q
PERCENT
2
I-
DES I %W
C SPEED
a
W n ?0
-
Q
3
0-
o 98
c 0 188
a I .2
w OESIGN
a
x
W
I
c
2
c
0
I
1.8
2.2
2.0
0
I
u
c
a 1.8
Y
a
a
v)
u) 1.6
W
a
a
-I 1.+
I
c
0
1 .2
1.8
-+ 8 + I
86
II 11.11
1 .z
0
a
c
0 1.1
-
*
c
V
0
1 .B
-8
W
>
8.9
c
A
-
I
0
0
I
8. 8
a
W
S
8.7
I
1.6 PERCENT
0
.
zc
DESIGN
SPEED
Q 70
X
0 a 90
c
S 1.t 0 1-
W 0 DESIGN
>
I
c
c
-8
W
PL db
1.z
a-
W
A
z
I
i .a
IS
-
0
W
W
A
18
L1
22
c
22
0
-
I
c
c 5
>
W
0
a a 0
S U C l I l l Y S U R F M E I N C I D E N C E ANGLE. OEC
87
!I.
R
I
a
W
I-
W
S
c
0
c
0
u)
u)
0
-1
-1
c
I-
O
c
PERCENT
DES 1GY
c SPEED
zz
w
I
0 78
-
0
90
IL
Y
0 100
W
0
u DESIGN
u)
u)
0
-1
-I
c
0
#-
a
c
0
u
c
Y
-
;c
0
tn
3
-
IL
Y
88
1 .a
*
-0
V
z
W
\L
\L
W
0.8
0
c
c
m
C
a
c
8.6
l.+
PERCENT
0 DESIGN
I
e SPEEO
C
a
w a 70
a 90
c
3 0 Iff0
c
a 1.2 o DESIGN
W
a
S
w
I
d
c
r
0
1
.0
2.2
2.0
0
c
-220
c
a 1.8 ._
W
a
a
VI
-- e"b"
u,
Y
1.6
a
a
3 1 .+
c
c
0
1.2
1 .a
0 + e
a 1.1
-
*
c
0
0
1.0
-1
W
>
-1
0.9
c
z
--
0
c) 8.8
a
W
X
8.7
1.6
PERCENT
DESIGN
0 SPEED
z
I a 78
-
0
c I.? 98
S o 108
-
W
>
c
DESIGN
c
1
W
a 1.2
c
W
-1
z
I
1.8
15
.
W
0
W
10
A
0
z
c
-
z
0
-
c
c
D
W
5
c)
0
-+ 0 + 8
=
c
W
w
*
c
a
.E4
c
a
In
In
0
2
-I -82
c
c
0
c
.ea
.3 PERCENT
DESIGN
SPEED
n 70
o 90
-2 0 100
DESIGN
In
v)
0
-I
-1
2
8
c
0
-0
a
0
I
o I
O8
I
c
L
-
zc
0
In
-
=a -6
-+I
L
-2
-+ 0 8
91
>
u
z
w
2
li
IL
W
-
u
I
c
-
m
c
0
c
1. -T
-
0
c-
C
PERCENT
OESIGN
SPEED
a
W o 70
a o 90
a
I-
0 100
C
Q! 1.2
W
a 0 DESIGN
E
W
I
2
c
t
c
0
1.0
2.2
-
0
r
c
2.0
0 1.8
a
W
a
v)
u) 1.6
W
a
0
2
tc
-
1 .+
0
I
1.2
1.0
-+ a +
92
I .z
0
t
c
0 1.1
-
*
c
0 1.8
2
W
>
8. 9
eI
-
;L
0
-
I
0
W
8.8
S
8.1
1.6 PERCENT
DESIGN
SPEEO
0
z
0 78
X
c
0
0 98
S
1.q 0 108
-
W
-
> 0 DESIGN
t
c
W
3
a 1 .z
c
-
W
3
;L
1 .a I.
15
.
W
0
W
I 0
0
2
z
c
z
0
-
I
c
c 5
W
0
93
.3
PERCENT
SDESIGN
PEEO
n 70
-
.z o 90
0 180
DESIGN
In
v)
0
2
-I
c
D
0
D
.z '
-+
I
0
*
u
z
W
0
I 8&
af L
Y
m
W
0. a
-
0
c
<
-
m
c
0
c
a. 6
1.P
PERCENT
0 DESIGN
c SPEED
c
a
I P 70
w
U. ll 98
3
I
<
a
w
a
-
1.2
I o lag
0 OESIGN
--1
x
c
W
2
c
0
I
1 .B
2.2
2.0
0
I
c
c
a 1.8
W
U.
3
VI
VI 1.6
w
U.
a
A I .?
c
0
b
1.2
1 .a
a a
95
I.?
1.2
I .0
0. E
1 .e
PERCENT
O E S I GN
SPEED
n 78
0. a
n 90
0 100
DESIGY
0.6
0. ?
96
-80
a
W
8-
w:
I
c
.B6 \ h
a
c
a
In .B+
u)
0
-1
-1
c
c
-82
e
0
.E0
.3
PERCENT
DESIGN
e SPEED
-
z
W
0
n
o
78
90
I
IL .z o 188
IL
W
0
o
0 DESIGN
In
0
-1
.I
2
c
e
e
O
.kl
-8
a
e
0
o .b
<
L
I
0
In
3
-
IL
IL
0
.4
.5 0 5
91
z
I
c
a
-
>
I-
0
0
-1
W
>
-1
C
--
a!
0
n
a
W
I
:
PERCENT
DESIGN
SPEED
0
;L
r n ?E
-
0 0 90
< 0 100
x
-
W
>
I-
C
DESIGN
-1
W
a
I
-
w
-1
z
LD
.
W
0
W
-1
0
x
c
-
2
0
-
I-
c
>
w
0
-5 5
r3
PERCENl
DESIGN
t SPEEO
--
z
W
0
n
0
78
98
Y
L
.z 0 10B
W
0 0 OESIGI
u
tn
tn
0
3
.I
c
-4
8
e
0
.0
0
0
c
0
c
L
.6
z
0,
UI
a .+
-Y
L
0
.z
.
L
-28 -15 -18 -5 8 5
99
-
0
I-
C
l.*
>
c
u
0
1.2
-I
W
>
-I
c 1.0
-
z?
0
0
I
Q
w
I:
B. 8
1 .fl
PERCENT
DESIGN
SPEEO
0
z
CJ 70
2z
0
c
a 90
S
0.8 0 I00
-
w
>
I-
c
>
0 DESIGN
3
W
Q B. 6
c
W
-I
z?
I
0.4
IS
a
w
0
I 0
0
-28 -15 -I0 -5 I
100
.B8
a
W
8-
W
-86
X
c
a
c
n
UI .B+
UI
0
A
3
c
I
.E2
0
8
.80
.3
t
z
78
-
w n
I
u 0 90
IL
.2 0 188
Y
0
0
DESIGN
0
UI
0
3
.1
-I
c
I-
O
I
-0
.
.8
a
0
I
u
c
L
.b
I
-
z
0
UI
3
4
u.
Y
0
.q
.2
F -15 -1s -5 0 5
101
I l l l l l
0
I
1 .+
I-
C
a
-*
c
0
0
I .2
-1
W
>
-1
c 1.0
-
;L
0
n
Q
w
S
8.8
PERCENT
DE5IGN
0 SPEED
z
La
E a 70
-
c o 90
x 0 180
-
W
>
c
e
DESIGN
A
W
Q
E
c
-
W
-1
z
IS
Q
W
0
.
)
W
-1
Q
z
c
z
0
I
-
c
c
>
W
0
5
-20 I -10 -5 5
S U C T I O H SURFACE I N C I D E N C E ANGLE# D E 6
102
-08
Q
c
W
W
-06
E
c
a
c
a
.E+
I
In
In
0
A
-I
c
c
.E2
c
0
.BE
.3
PERCENT
D E S I GN
c SPEED
--
z
w
0
a
o
70
90
Y .2 0 180
IL
W
0
o 0 OESl6N
In
0
u)
-4
.I
A
c
c
0
.E
.a
Q
c
0
o .6
c
L
-
z
0
III
3
-
LL
Y
0
.l
.z
103
1.E
PERCENT
DES I6Y
SPEED
c3 78
-
E. a o 98
0 100
DESIGW
8.4
E.*
15
ia
104
!
-
a
W
W
t
c
.Bb
a
c
-I
c
.E2
c
PERCENT
DES I GN
SPEED
7a
0 90
.2 0 100
DESIGN
-1
-I
c
0
c
.0
u.
I
!0 -15 -10 -5 0 5
I
(e) Concluded. Location, 50 percent of span.
Figure 11. - Continued. Bladeelement performance for stator 38.
105
-
0
I-
C
1.4
-
>
c
0
0
1.2
-1
W
>
-I
c 1 .a
-z
0
0
a
W
S
8.8
1 .a
0
I
r n 70
-
0 90
c
S
B. a 0 100
W
>
I
DESIGN
e
c
-I
W
a 8.6
c
W
-
A
a2
0.0
0
W
0
W
2
.
n
I
<
I
0
-
e
c
>
W
0
106
i
U
W
I
w
S
c
a
<
0
Lo
In
0
-I
-J
c
b
c
0
--
IL
W
0
c3
0
78
98
L 0 100
w
Y
0
0
0 DESIGN
In
In
0
2
2
c
t
0
I
-
a
0
c
0
c
I
I
L
-
z
0
v)
m
3
-
k
m
0
- 15
-28 -18 -5 8 5
107
.+
-
0
c
c
1
-
>
I-
0
I .2
0
-I
w
>
-a
c 1 .a
--
x
0
n
a
w
S
a.a
1 .a
i
PERCEYT
0
z
. DESIGN
SPEED
S n 70
0 90
a 8. E
1
S 0 100
-
w
>
c
c
0 DESIGN
2
w
a 8.b
c
w
-I
I
I
a. t
IS
0
w
n
w
-
-I
18
u
x
c
-
;c
0
-
8
c
>
W
5
0
-20 -1s -I 0
108
.RE
m
W
I-
-86
W
S
c
O
c
a.
In .a+ 9\
In
0
2
A
c
I-
.E2
O
I
.80
.3 PERCENT
DESIGN
SPEED
t
--
1
W
0
0 70
90
IL
.2 0 100
P
W
0 DESIGN
0
In
0
A
.�
-I
c
I-
O
I-
.E
.E
O
0
I
0
c .b
P
z
0
I
In
a .o
-
P
P
.2
I -10 -5 0 5
I .z
I .E
D
8.8
1 .P
PERCENT
DESIGN
SPEED
c3 70
8. E 0 90
0 100
0 DESIGN
8.6
0.
15
10
0
-28 -I5 -18 -5 0 5
110
.HE
a
W
I
-06
W
S
c
a
c
a
u) .H+
an
0
A
-I
c
c
.02
0
I
.00
.3 PERCENT
OESIGN
SPEED
=
I-
W n 78
-
0
Y
m
.2
0
o I88
98
W
0 DESIGN
0
UI
UI
0
A
.I
A
c
I
c
O
.E
.a
-6
.P
.z
-28
I
I
I
-15
. __
-18
-&
-5
S U C T l O Y S U R F A C E IYCIDENCE ANGLE# O E 6
Figure 11.
(h) Concluded. Location, 90 percent of span.
- Continued.
8
i
Bladeelement performance for stator 38.
5
111
t
-
0
I.+
c
a
-
>
c
0
1.2
9ar
0
J
W
>
J
I
c 1.0
-
=?
0
-
0
a
W
x
0. B
0
z
. PERCENT
DESIGN
SPEED
I
0
n 70
c o 90
X 0 100
c
->
W
DESIGN
c
-I
W
a 0.4
e
w
-I
z
I
0. +
0
W
0
W
J
-
a
a?
c
z
0
-
I
D
c
>
W
0
112
.08
0
4
I
W
I
c
0
n
c
-06
3
I
u) -04
v)
0
-J
2
c
-02
0
I
.E2
- . .
-3 PERCENT
DESIGN
SPEED
-
C
;r
W n
0
78
98
0 .2 0 100
LL
In.
W
DESIGN
0
v)
u)
0
A
.I
3
e-c
0
I
.E
.8 -
O
c
0
c
0 -6
I
I
y.
z
0
I
v)
a .q -.
I
LL
U
I
.2 .
-15
113
I
1. Report No.
NASA TP-2001
4. Title and Subtitle
PERFORMANCE OF SINGLE -STAGE
I 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No
5. Report Date
A p r i l 1982
AXIAL-FLOW TRANSONIC COMPRESSOR WITH ROTOR AND
STATOR ASPECT RATIOS OF 1.63 AND 1.77, RESPECTIVELY, 6. Performing Organization Code
AND WITH DESIGN PRESSURE RATIO OF 2.05 505 -32 -2A
7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No
1
I
15. Supplementary Notes
The overall and blade-element performance of a transonic compressor stage is presented over
- i
the stable operating range f o r speeds f r o m 50 to 100 percent of design. The stage was designed
f o r a p r e s s u r e ratio of 2.05 at a flow of 20.2 kg/sec and a tip speed of 455 m/sec. At design
speed the rotor and stage achieved peak efficiencies of 0.849 and 0.831, respectively, at the
minimum flow condition. The stage stall point occurred at a flow higher than the design flow.
" _ -- ~
1
20. Security Classif. (of this page)
Unclassified Unclassified
. - _. .-
For sale by the National Technical Information Service, Springfield. Virginia 22161
NASA-Langl ey, 1982
....- ..
National Aeronautics and THIRD-CLASS BULK RATE Postage and Fees Paid
Nationaf Aeronautics and
Space Administration Space Administration
NASA451
Washington, D.C.
20546
.Official Business
Penalty for Private Use, $300