Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 44

Morgan & Mikhail’s Clinical

Anesthesiology, Seventh Edition John


F. Butterworth Iv
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmass.com/product/morgan-mikhails-clinical-anesthesiology-seventh-editi
on-john-f-butterworth-iv/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...

Morgan and Mikhail's Clinical Anesthesiology Cases John


F. Butterworth

https://ebookmass.com/product/morgan-and-mikhails-clinical-
anesthesiology-cases-john-f-butterworth/

Morgan & Mikhail’s Clinical Anesthesiology Cases 1st


Edition John F. Butterworth

https://ebookmass.com/product/morgan-mikhails-clinical-
anesthesiology-cases-1st-edition-john-f-butterworth/

Morgan & Mikhail’s Clinical Anesthesiology 6th edition


Edition John F. Butterworth

https://ebookmass.com/product/morgan-mikhails-clinical-
anesthesiology-6th-edition-edition-john-f-butterworth/

Morgan and Mikhail's Clinical Anesthesiology, 7e (Jul


25, 2022)_(1260473791)_(McGraw Hill).pdf David Mackey

https://ebookmass.com/product/morgan-and-mikhails-clinical-
anesthesiology-7e-jul-25-2022_1260473791_mcgraw-hill-pdf-david-
mackey/
Kanski’s Clinical Ophthalmology. A Systematic Approach
9th Edition John F. Salmon

https://ebookmass.com/product/kanskis-clinical-ophthalmology-a-
systematic-approach-9th-edition-john-f-salmon/

Master Handbook of Acoustics, Seventh Edition F. Alton


Everest

https://ebookmass.com/product/master-handbook-of-acoustics-
seventh-edition-f-alton-everest/

-Kanski's Clinical Ophthalmology: A Systematic Approach


Textbook 9th Edition John F. Salmon

https://ebookmass.com/product/kanskis-clinical-ophthalmology-a-
systematic-approach-textbook-9th-edition-john-f-salmon/

Psicologia dello sviluppo+connect IV Edition John W.


Santrock

https://ebookmass.com/product/psicologia-dello-sviluppoconnect-
iv-edition-john-w-santrock/

Private Life of Edward IV 1st Edition John Ashdown-Hill

https://ebookmass.com/product/private-life-of-edward-iv-1st-
edition-john-ashdown-hill/
Copyright © 2022 by McGraw Hill LLC. All rights reserved. Except as
permitted under the United States Copyright Act of 1976, no part of
this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by
any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the
prior written permission of the publisher.

ISBN: 978-1-26-047380-3
MHID: 1-26-047380-5

The material in this eBook also appears in the print version of this
title: ISBN: 978-1-26-047379-7, MHID: 1-26-047379-1.

eBook conversion by codeMantra


Version 1.0

All trademarks are trademarks of their respective owners. Rather


than put a trademark symbol after every occurrence of a
trademarked name, we use names in an editorial fashion only, and
to the benefit of the trademark owner, with no intention of
infringement of the trademark. Where such designations appear in
this book, they have been printed with initial caps.

McGraw-Hill Education eBooks are available at special quantity


discounts to use as premiums and sales promotions or for use in
corporate training programs. To contact a representative, please visit
the Contact Us page at www.mhprofessional.com.

Notice

Information contained in this work has been obtained by McGraw Hill


from sources believed to be reliable. However, neither McGraw Hill
nor its authors guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any
information published herein, and neither McGraw Hill nor its authors
shall be responsible for any errors, omissions, or damages arising
out of use of this information. This work is published with the
understanding that McGraw Hill and its authors are supplying
information but are not attempting to render engineering or other
professional services. If such services are required, the assistance of
an appropriate professional should be sought.

TERMS OF USE

This is a copyrighted work and McGraw-Hill Education and its


licensors reserve all rights in and to the work. Use of this work is
subject to these terms. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act
of 1976 and the right to store and retrieve one copy of the work,
you may not decompile, disassemble, reverse engineer, reproduce,
modify, create derivative works based upon, transmit, distribute,
disseminate, sell, publish or sublicense the work or any part of it
without McGraw-Hill Education’s prior consent. You may use the
work for your own noncommercial and personal use; any other use
of the work is strictly prohibited. Your right to use the work may be
terminated if you fail to comply with these terms.

THE WORK IS PROVIDED “AS IS.” McGRAW-HILL EDUCATION AND


ITS LICENSORS MAKE NO GUARANTEES OR WARRANTIES AS TO
THE ACCURACY, ADEQUACY OR COMPLETENESS OF OR RESULTS
TO BE OBTAINED FROM USING THE WORK, INCLUDING ANY
INFORMATION THAT CAN BE ACCESSED THROUGH THE WORK VIA
HYPERLINK OR OTHERWISE, AND EXPRESSLY DISCLAIM ANY
WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED
TO IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR
A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. McGraw-Hill Education and its licensors do
not warrant or guarantee that the functions contained in the work
will meet your requirements or that its operation will be
uninterrupted or error free. Neither McGraw-Hill Education nor its
licensors shall be liable to you or anyone else for any inaccuracy,
error or omission, regardless of cause, in the work or for any
damages resulting therefrom. McGraw-Hill Education has no
responsibility for the content of any information accessed through
the work. Under no circumstances shall McGraw-Hill Education
and/or its licensors be liable for any indirect, incidental, special,
punitive, consequential or similar damages that result from the use
of or inability to use the work, even if any of them has been advised
of the possibility of such damages. This limitation of liability shall
apply to any claim or cause whatsoever whether such claim or cause
arises in contract, tort or otherwise.
Contents
Chapter Authors
Past Contributors
Foreword
Preface
1 The Practice of Anesthesiology

SECTION I Anesthetic Equipment &


Monitors

2 The Operating Room Environment


3 Breathing Systems

4 The Anesthesia Workstation

5 Cardiovascular Monitoring
6 Noncardiovascular Monitoring

SECTION II Clinical Pharmacology

7 Pharmacological Principles
8 Inhalation Anesthetics

9 Intravenous Anesthetics
10 Analgesic Agents

11 Neuromuscular Blocking Agents

12 Cholinesterase Inhibitors & Other


Pharmacological Antagonists to Neuromuscular
Blocking Agents
13 Anticholinergic Drugs

14 Adrenergic Agonists & Antagonists


15 Hypotensive Agents

16 Local Anesthetics

17 Adjuncts to Anesthesia

SECTION III Anesthetic Management

18 Preoperative Assessment, Premedication, &


Perioperative Documentation

19 Airway Management

20 Cardiovascular Physiology & Anesthesia


21 Anesthesia for Patients with Cardiovascular
Disease

22 Anesthesia for Cardiovascular Surgery


Nirvik Pal, MD
23 Respiratory Physiology & Anesthesia
24 Anesthesia for Patients with Respiratory Disease

25 Anesthesia for Thoracic Surgery

26 Neurophysiology & Anesthesia


27 Anesthesia for Neurosurgery

28 Anesthesia for Patients with Neurological &


Psychiatric Diseases

29 Anesthesia for Patients with Neuromuscular


Disease
30 Kidney Physiology & Anesthesia

31 Anesthesia for Patients with Kidney Disease

32 Anesthesia for Genitourinary Surgery


33 Hepatic Physiology & Anesthesia
Michael Ramsay, MD, FRCA
34 Anesthesia for Patients with Liver Disease
Michael Ramsay, MD, FRCA
35 Anesthesia for Patients with Endocrine Disease
36 Anesthesia for Ophthalmic Surgery

37 Anesthesia for Otolaryngology–Head & Neck


Surgery

38 Anesthesia for Orthopedic Surgery


Edward R. Mariano, MD, MAS, FASA, and Jody C.
Leng, MD, MS
39 Anesthesia for Trauma & Emergency Surgery
40 Maternal & Fetal Physiology & Anesthesia
Michael A. Frölich, MD, MS
41 Obstetric Anesthesia
Michael A. Frölich, MD, MS
42 Pediatric Anesthesia
Seamas Dore, MD
43 Geriatric Anesthesia

44 Ambulatory & Non–Operating Room Anesthesia

SECTION IV Regional Anesthesia & Pain


Management
45 Spinal, Epidural, & Caudal Blocks

46 Peripheral Nerve Blocks


John J. Finneran IV, MD and Brian M. Ilfeld, MD,
MS (Clinical Investigation)
47 Chronic Pain Management
Bruce M. Vrooman, MD, MS, and Kimberly M.
Youngren, MD
48 Enhanced Recovery Protocols & Optimization of
Perioperative Outcomes
Gabriele Baldini, MD, MSc

SECTION V Perioperative & Critical Care


Medicine

49 Management of Patients with Fluid & Electrolyte


Disturbances

50 Acid–Base Management
51 Fluid Management & Blood Component Therapy

52 Thermoregulation, Hypothermia, & Malignant


Hyperthermia

53 Nutrition in Perioperative & Critical Care


54 Anesthetic Complications
55 Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
George W. Williams, MD, FASA, FCCM, FCCP
56 Postanesthesia Care

57 Common Clinical Concerns in Critical Care


Medicine
Pranav Shah, MD
58 Inhalation Therapy & Mechanical Ventilation in
the PACU & ICU

59 Safety, Quality, & Performance Improvement

Index
Chapter Authors
Gabriele Baldini, MD, MSc
Associate Professor
Medical Director, Montreal General Hospital Preoperative Centre
Department of Anesthesia
McGill University Health Centre
Montreal General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, Canada

John F. Butterworth IV, MD


Former Professor and Chairman
Department of Anesthesiology
Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine
VCU Health System
Richmond, Virginia

Seamas Dore, MD
Assistant Professor
Department of Anesthesiology
Virginia Commonwealth University
School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia

John J. Finneran IV, MD


Associate Professor of Anesthesiology
University of California, San Diego

Michael A. Frölich, MD, MS


Tenured professor
Department of Anesthesiology andPerioperative Medicine
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama

Brian M. Ilfeld, MD, MS (Clinical Investigation)


Professor of Anesthesiology, In Residence
Division of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
Department of Anesthesiology
University of California at San Diego
San Diego, California

Jody C. Leng, MD, MS


Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care Service,
Virginia
Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine,
Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California

David C. Mackey, MD
Professor
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas

Edward R. Mariano, MD, MAS


Professor
Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine
Stanford University School of Medicine
Chief, Anesthesiology & Perioperative Care Service
Associate Chief of Staff, Inpatient Surgical Services
Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System
Palo Alto, California

Nirvik Pal, MD
Associate Professor
Department of Anesthesiology
Virginia Commonwealth University
School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia

Michael Ramsay, MD, FRCA


Chairman, Department of Anesthesiology
Baylor University Medical Center
Baylor Scott and White Health Care System
Professor
Texas A&M University Health Care Faculty
Dallas, Texas

Pranav Shah, MD
Assistant Professor
Department of Anesthesiology
VCU School of Medicine
Richmond, Virginia

Bruce M. Vrooman, MD, MS, FIPP


Associate Professor of Anesthesiology
Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire

John D. Wasnick, MD, MPH


Steven L. Berk Endowed Chair for Excellence in Medicine
Professor and Chair
Department of Anesthesia
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
School of Medicine
Lubbock, Texas

George W. Williams, MD, FASA, FCCP


Associate Professor of Anesthesiology and Surgery & Vice Chair for
Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology
Medical Co-Director, Surgical Intensive Care Unit- Lyndon B. Johnson
General Hospital
Medical Director, Donor Specialty Care Unit- Memorial Hermann
Hospital TMC
Chair, American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Critical
Care Medicine

Kimberly Youngren, MD
Clinical Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology
Geisel School of Medicine
Program Director, Pain Medicine Fellowship
Dartmouth Hitchcock. Lebanon
Past Contributors
Kallol Chaudhuri, MD, PhD
Professor
Department of Anesthesia
West Virginia University School of Medicine
Morgantown, West Virginia

Swapna Chaudhuri, MD, PhD


Professor
Department of Anesthesia
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Lubbock, Texas

Lydia Conlay, MD
Professor
Department of Anesthesia
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Lubbock, Texas

Johannes De Riese, MD
Assistant Professor
Department of Anesthesiology
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Lubbock, Texas

Seamas Dore, MD
Assistant Professor
Department of Anesthesiology
Virginia Commonwealth University
School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia
Suzanne N. Northcutt, MD
Associate Professor
Department of Anesthesia
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Lubbock, Texas

Aschraf N. Farag, MD
Assistant Professor
Department of Anesthesia
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Lubbock, Texas

Pranav Shah, MD
Assistant Professor
Department of Anesthesiology
VCU School of Medicine
Richmond, Virginia

Robert Johnston, MD
Associate Professor
Department of Anesthesia
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Lubbock, Texas

Sabry Khalil, MD
Assistant Professor
Department of Anesthesiology
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Lubbock, Texas

Sanford Littwin, MD
Assistant Professor
Department of Anesthesiology
St. Luke’s Roosevelt Hospital Center and Columbia University College
of Physicians and Surgeons
New York, New York

Alina Nicoara, MD
Associate Professor
Department of Anesthesiology
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina

Nirvik Pal, MD
Associate Professor
Department of Anesthesiology
Virginia Commonwealth University
School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia

Nitin Parikh, MD
Associate Professor
Department of Anesthesia
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Lubbock, Texas

Cooper W. Phillips, MD
Assistant Professor
Department of Anesthesiology
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas

Elizabeth R. Rivas, MD
Assistant Professor
Department of Anesthesiology
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Lubbock, Texas

Bettina Schmitz, MD, PhD


Associate Professor
Department of Anesthesia
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Lubbock, Texas

Christiane Vogt-Harenkamp, MD, PhD


Assistant Professor
Department of Anesthesia
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Lubbock, Texas

Denise J. Wedel, MD
Professor of Anesthesiology
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
Army of Portugal—1st January, 1811.

Head-quarters, Torres Novas.


2d Corps, Head-quarters Santarem.
Under arms. Detached. Hosp. Effective. Horses.
Men. Horses. Men. Horses. Men. Men. Cav. Draught.
Merle’s division, 9 battalions 4,368 ” 150 ” 1,549 6,067 ” ”
Heudelet’s do. 12 do. 5,718 ” 451 ” 2,646 8,815 ” ”
Lt. cavalry, Soult, 15 squadrons 1,146 993 523 537 231 1,900 1,530 ”
Artillery and engineers 1,284 1,121 52 9 189 1,425 112 1,018
Total 12,516 2,114 1,176 546 4,515 18,207 1,642 1,018

6th Corps, Thomar.


Marchand, 11 battalions 4,987 28 529 ” 1,121 6,637 28 ”
Mermet’s, 11 do. 6,252 ” 743 ” 1,077 8,104 ” ”
Loison, 12 do. 4,589 ” 1,037 ” 3,291 8,917 ” ”
Light cavalry, Lamotte, 7 squadrons 652 651 663 663 117 1,432 1,314 ”
Artillery and engineers, 28 companies 1,769 1,372 47 78 165 1,981 52 1,398
Total 18,272 2,051 3,019 741 5,771 27,094 1,394 1,398

8th Corps, Pernes.


Clausel, 11 battalions 4,007 18 484 ” 3,989 8,627 18 ”
Solignac, 14 do. 4,997 ” 1,953 ” 3,337 10,346 ” ”
St. Croix’s dragoons, 12 squadrons 981 1,024 698 698 238 1,917 1,722 ”
Artillery and engineers 1,106 859 24 4 359 1,522 151 712
On leave ” ” ” ” ” 206 ” ”
Total 11,108 1,901 3,159 702 7,956 22,605 1,191 712

Montbrun, Ourem.
Reserve of cavalry 24 squadrons with
2,729 2,871 1,486 1,466 178 4,533 4,337
artillery
Artillery, engineers, and equipage of the
1,546 614 ” ” 283 2,090 614
army
9th Corps, Leiria.
Claparede,
15 battalions, 7,863 11 369 ” 432 8,714 ”
Almeida
Couroux,
12 battalions, 7,592 27 447 ” 1,299 9,338 27
Leiria
Fournier’s cavalry,
7 squadrons 1,698 1,591 60 67 114 1,872 1,658
at Toro
Artillery and engineers,
670 464 ” 72 742 ” 464
Ciudad Rodrigo
Total 17,823 2,093 876 139 2,637 19,924 2,149

Note.—Salamanca constituted a government containing the towns of Alba de


Tormes, Penaranda, and Salamanca, in which were deposited the sick men,
stragglers, equipages, and depôts, of the army of Portugal. The total amounting to
2,354 men and 1,102 horses.
Present under arms.
Men. Horses.
General Total of the army of Portugal in the
46,171 9,551
position of Santarem
9th Corps 17,823 2,093
——— ———
63,994 11,644
Deduct troops of the 9th corps not in Portugal 10,231 2,066
——— ———
Real numbers under Massena 53,763 9,578
——— ———
Army of Portugal—1st April, 1811.
Under arms. Detached. Hosp. Effective.
Men. Horses. Men. Horses. Men. Men. Horses.
8th corps, Junot 13,448 ” 992 ” 5,719 20,159 ”
6th do. Marmont 13,984 ” 1,374 ” 1,576 16,934 ”
2d corps, Reynier 10,837 ” 1,350 ” 4,318 16,505 ”
Montbrun
{ Dragoon, 23 squadrons 4,173 4,404 ” ” ” 4,173 4,404
{ Light cavalry, 14 squadrons 3,636 3,906 ” ” 38 3,636 3,906
{ 1 squadron of gens-d’armes 190 72 ” ” 5 102 72

Under arms. Detached. Hosp. Effective.


Men. Horses. Men. Horses. Men. Men. Horses.
Artillery and Engineers
{ Foot artillery.
936 ” ” ” 88 1,055 ”
Almeida and Rodrigo
{ Horse artillery 410 425 ” ” 23 453 425
{ Artillery of the train 2,181 2,378 ” ” 237 2,448 2,378
{ Workmen 259 ” ” ” 25 295 ”
{ Engineers 1,448 60 ” ” 140 1,623 ”
{ Military equipage 596 897 ” ” 60 668 897
Total artilleries, engineers, &c. 5,969 3,335 ” ” 573 6,542 2,760
Total of infantry 37,269 ” 3,716 ” 11,613 53,598 ”
Total of cavalry 7,999 8,382 ” ” 43 7,911 8,382
General Total 51,237 11,717 3,716 ” 12,229 68,051 11,142

Note.—In the imperial rolls there was no state of the army of Portugal for May.
Two divisions of the 9th corps, directed to be added to the army of Portugal, are
included in the state for April, and the prince of Esling was empowered to distribute
the cavalry as he pleased, provided the brigade of general Fournier, from the 9th
corps, was kept in the reserve. The detached men were in the government of
Salamanca. On the 1st of June, however, the army of Portugal is returned as
present under arms 44,548 men, 7,253 horses, and 4,620 men detached. Hence, I
have estimated the number of fighting men and officers, including the imperial
guards, at Fuentes Onoro at 45,000, a number, perhaps, too great, when the
artificers, engineers, &c. are deducted.
S E C T I O N 3 . — A R M Y O F T H E S O U T H , S O U L T, D U K E O F
D A L M AT I A , C O M M A N D I N G .
Under arms. Detached. Hosp. Effective. Horses.
Men. Horses. Men. Horses. Men. Men. Cav. Draught.
1st of January 55,602 12,092 5,744 1,999 6,412 67,758 10,868 3,223
15th May 75,133 13,124 3,915 1,336 11,420 90,468 12,156 2,304
Deduct the troops of the 9th corps in march from the north
11,917 1,619 ” ” ” 13,310 1,220 399
Real total of the army of the South
63,216 11,505 3,915 1,336 11,420 77,158 10,936 1,905
SECTION 4.

5th Corps, 15th January.


Under arms. Detached.
Men. Horses. Men. Horses.
18,766 6,158 3,035 640

16th December, 1810, le Duc de Dalmatie, va faire le siège de Badajos, avec


tout le 5em corps d’armée, 8 régimens de cavalerie formant 2,600 chevaux pris
dans les lere et 5em corps d’armée sous les orders de general Latour Maubourg,
900 hommes du 63em regiment de ligne, 2 compagnies d’artillerie légère, 4
compagnies de sappeurs, 1 compagnie de mineurs, et trois escadrons de
cavalerie Espagnols.
SECTION 5.

1st Corps before Cadiz.


Under arms. Detached. Hosp. Effective. Horses.
Men. Horses. Men. Horses. Men. Men. Cav. Train.
15th February, 1811 20,572 1,886 1,331 681 1,254 23,457 1,495 1,072
Reinforcement on the march from the Governments
5,209 775 ” ” 743 5,952 712 62
Total 25,781 2,661 1,331 681 1,997 29,409 2,407 1,035

4th corps, 15th Feb. 16,706 4,007 741 397 1,699 19,143 3,618 793
Reinforcement on the march from the Governments
6,620 1,457 ” ” 878 6,854 1,451 ”
Total 22,726 5,464 741 397 2,577 25,998 5,069 793

Note.—A reinforcement of more than one thousand men likewise joined the 5th
corps while in front of Badajos.
SECTION 6.—ARMY OF THE NORTH—BESSIERES, DUKE
OF ISTRIA, COMMANDING.
Under arms. Detached. Hosp. Effective. Horses.
Men. Horses. Men. Men. Men. Cav. Train.
1st February, 1811 58,515 8,874 1,992 6,860 67,767 7,979 1,079
15th April, 1811 53,148 6,930 2,221 5,350 60,719 6,065 879
SECTION 7.—ARMÉE IMPÉRIALE DU MIDI DE
L’ E S PA G N E 1 m e C O R P S .

Situation des présens sous les armes à l’époque du 22d Mars 1811.
Etat des Dans les Emplacement des Troupes Dispos-
dans les Forts et
presens Forts et eables.
Redoutes.
Designation des sous les Redoutes.
Division Regimens armes.

Division 1.
9me Infantrie ligne 1,000 1,000 Sta Maria.
Depuis et compris le Fort St.
24me do. do. 800 400 Catherine jusqu’au Rio St. 400 Do.
Petro
Do. San Lucar,
Esta,
96me do. do. 1,100 1,100
Chipiona, la
Viala Atta.

Division 2.
16me do. do. 350 350 Xeres et la Cartuxa
Port Reale au
8me do. do. 713 713
Trocadero.
Depuis et compris le Fort
45me do. do. 1,072 744
Napoleon jusqu’à Chiese fe
328 Port Reale.

54me do. do. 820 820 Chiclana.


Bataillon d’Elite 236 236 Do.

Division 3.
27me Infantrie ligne 1,400 1,400 Do.
63me do. do. 845 845 Port Reale.
Depuis et compris la Redoute
94me do. do. 1,500 650
jusqu’à cette de Vellati
850 Chiclana.

95me do. do. 1,414 472 Arcos, Medina, Vejer, et Conil 942 Do.

Régiment de Marine.
43me Battalions de 900 900 Au Trocadero
marine
e
2 do. d’Ouvriers do. 615 615 Do.
5e Chasseurs 320 320 Vejer et Conil.

Cavalrie.
De Montesà, Alcazar de
1e de Dragoons 230 50
Xeres
180 Xeres.

2e do. do. 218 72 Do. et à la Cartuxa 146 Arcos.

Artillerie
à pied à Cheval 678 500 Sur la ligne du Blocas 178 Santa Maria,
Puerto Reale,
et Chiclana.
Sapeurs 323 323 Au Trocadero
Mineurs 77 77 Do.
——— ——— ———
14,611 5,153 9,458
——— ——— ———

By this return, which is not extracted from the imperial rolls, but was found
amongst Colonel Lejeune’s intercepted papers, it appears that Victor had above
nine thousand disposable troops seventeen days after the battle of Barosa. He
must, therefore, have had about eleven thousand disposable before that action,
and Cassagne’s detachment being deducted leaves about nine thousand for the
battle of Barosa.
S E C T I O N 8 . — S TAT E O F T H E B R I T I S H A N D G E R M A N
T R O O P S O N T H E C O A , 2 5 T H A P R I L , 1 8 11 , E X T R A C T E D
F R O M T H E A D J U TA N T- G E N E R A L’ S R E T U R N S .

Under arms. Sick. Detached.


Men. Men. Men.
Cavalry 4 regiments 1,525 274 542
Infantry 41 battalions 20,700 8,880 3,214
Artillery 1,378 144 1,156
——— ——— ———
Total of all arms 23,613 9,298 4,912
——— ——— ———
Guns 24 British, 18 Portuguese Total 42

Note.—There are no separate returns of the army engaged in the battle of


Fuentes Onoro. Hence, the above is only an approximation to the numbers of
British and German troops; but if the Portuguese and the Partida of Julian
Sanchez be added, the whole number in line will be about thirty-five thousand men
of all arms.
No. II.

EXTRACTS OF LETTERS FROM LORD WELLINGTON TO


LORD LIVERPOOL.

SECTION 1.

“November 30, 1809.


“I enclose copies and extracts of a correspondence which I have had with Mr.
Frere on the subject of the co-operation of the British army with the corps of the
duke of Albuquerque and the duke Del Parque in this plan of diversion.
“Adverting to the opinion which I have given to his majesty’s ministers and the
ambassador at Seville, it will not be supposed that I could have encouraged the
advance of general Areizaga, or could have held out the prospect of any co-
operation by the British army.
“The first official information which I had from the government of the movement
of general Areizaga was on the 18th, the day before his defeat, and I gave the
answer on the 19th regarding the plan of which I now enclose a copy.
“I was at Seville, however, when the general commenced his march from the
Sierra Morena, and in more than one conversation with the Spanish ministers and
members of the Junta, I communicated to them my conviction that general
Areizaga would be defeated. The expectation, however, of success from this large
army, stated to consist of fifty thousand men, was so general and so sanguine that
the possibility of disappointment was not even contemplated, and, accordingly,
your lordship will find that, on the 10th only, the government began to think it
necessary to endeavour to make a diversion in favour of general Areizaga, and it
is probable that it was thought expedient to make this diversion only in
consequence of the fall of the general’s own hopes, after his first trial with the
enemy on the night of the 10th instant.”—“I am anxious to cross the Tagus with the
British army and to station it on the frontiers of Old Castile, from thinking that the
point in which I can be of most use in preventing the enemy from effecting any
important object, and which best answers for my future operations in the defence
of Portugal. With this view, I have requested Mr. Frere to urge the government to
reinforce the duke D’Albuquerque’s corps, in order to secure the passage of the
lower part of the Tagus. And, although the state of the season would render it
desirable that I should make the movement at an early period, I do not propose to
make it till I shall see most clearly the consequences of that defeat, and some
prospect that the city of Seville will be secure after I shall move.”
SECTION 2.

“December 7, 1809.
“——I had urged the Spanish government to augment the army of the duke
D’Albuquerque to twenty thousand men, in order that it might occupy, in a sufficient
manner, the passage of the Tagus at Almaraz and the passes through the
mountains leading from Arzobispo to Truxillo, in which position they would have
covered effectually the province of Estremadura, during the winter at least, and
would have afforded time and leisure for preparations for farther opposition to the
enemy, and I delayed the movement, which I have long been desirous of making,
to the northward of the Tagus, till the reinforcements could be sent to the duke
D’Albuquerque which I had lately recommended should be drawn from the army of
the duke Del Parque. During the discussions upon the subject, the government
have given orders to the duke D’Albuquerque to retire with his corps behind the
Guadiana, to a position which he cannot maintain, thus leaving open the road into
Estremadura, and incurring the risk of the loss of that province whenever the
enemy choose to take possession of it.”

SECTION 3.

“January 31, 1810.


“——There is no doubt that, if the enemy’s reinforcements have not yet entered
Spain, and are not considerably advanced within the Spanish frontiers, the
operation which they have undertaken is one of some risk, and I have maturely
considered of the means of making a diversion in favour of the allies, which might
oblige the enemy to reduce his force in Andalusia, and would expose him to risk
and loss in this quarter. But the circumstances, which are detailed in the enclosed
copy of a letter to M. Frere, have obliged me to refrain from attempting this
operation at present. I have not, however, given up all thoughts of it, and I propose
to carry it into execution hereafter, if circumstances will permit.”

SECTION 4.

“January 12, 1811.


“My former despatch will have informed your lordship that I was apprehensive
that the Spanish troops in Estremadura would not make any serious opposition to
the progress which it was my opinion the enemy would attempt to make in that
province; but as they had been directed to destroy the bridges on the Guadiana, at
Merida and Medellin, and preparations had been ordered for that purpose, and to
defend the passage of the Guadiana as long as was practicable, I was in hopes
that the enemy would have been delayed at least for some days before he should
be allowed to pass that river. But I have been disappointed in that expectation, and
the town and bridge of Merida appear to have been given up to an advanced
guard of cavalry.”

SECTION 5.

“January 19, 1811.


“At the moment when the enemy entered Estremadura from Seville general
Ballasteros received an order from the Regency, dated the 21st December last,
directing him to proceed with the troops under his command into the Condada de
Niebla. The force in Estremadura was thus diminished by one-half, and the
remainder are considered insufficient to attempt the relief of the troops in
Olivenza.”
“The circumstances which I have above related will show your lordship that the
military system of the Spanish nation is not much improved, and that it is not very
easy to combine or regulate operations with corps so ill organised, in possession
of so little intelligence, and upon whose actions so little reliance can be placed. It
will scarcely be credited that the first intelligence which general Mendizabel
received of the assembly of the enemy’s troops at Seville was from hence; and if
any combination was then made, either for retreat or defence, it was rendered
useless, or destroyed by the orders from the Regency, to detach general
Ballasteros into the Condado de Niebla, which were dated the 21st of December,
the very day on which Soult broke up from Cadiz, with a detachment of infantry,
and marched to Seville.”

SECTION 6.

“February 2, 1811.
“The various events of the war will have shown your lordship that no calculation
can be made on the result of any operation in which the Spanish troops are
engaged. But if the same number of troops of any other nation (ten thousand)
were to be employed on this operation, (the opening the communication with
Badajos,) I should have no doubt of their success, or of their ability to prevent the
French from attacking Badajos with the forces which they have now employed on
this service.”

SECTION 7.

“February 9, 1811.
“General Mendizabel has not adhered to the plan which was ordered by the late
marquess De la Romana, which provided for the security of the communication
with Elvas before the troops should be thrown to the left of the Guadiana. I don’t
believe that the strength of the enemy, on either side of the Guadiana, is
accurately known, but if they should be in strength on the right of that river, it is to
be apprehended that the whole of the troops will be shut up in Badajos, and I have
reason to believe that this place is entirely unprovided with provisions,
notwithstanding that the siege of it has been expected for the last year.”

SECTION 8.

“February 23, 1811.


“Although experience has taught me to place no reliance upon the effect of the
exertions of the Spanish troops, notwithstanding the frequent instances of their
bravery, I acknowledge that this recent disaster has disappointed and grieved me
much. The loss of this army and its probable consequences, the fall of Badajos,
have materially altered the situation of the allies in this part of the Peninsula, and it
will not be an easy task to place them in the situation in which they were, much
less in that in which they would have been, if that misfortune had not occurred. I
am concerned to add to this melancholy history, that the Portuguese brigade of
cavalry did not behave much better than the other troops. Brigadier-general
Madden did every thing in his power to induce them to charge, but in vain.” “The
operations of the Guerillas continue throughout the interior; and I have proofs that
the political hostility of the people of Spain towards the enemy is increasing rather
than diminishing. But I have not yet heard of any measure being adopted to supply
the regular funds to pay and support an army, or to raise one.”

SECTION 9.

“March 21, 1811.


“It (Campo Mayor) had been given over to the charge of the marquis of Romana,
at his request, last year. But, lately, the Spanish garrison had been first weakened
and then withdrawn, in a manner not very satisfactory to me, nor consistent with
the honourable engagements to defend the place into which the marquis entered
when it was delivered over to his charge. I am informed, however, that marshal
Bessieres has collected at Zamora about seven thousand men, composed
principally of the imperial guard, and of troops taken from all the garrisons in
Castile. He thus threatens an attack upon Gallicia, in which province there are, I
understand, sixteen thousand men under general Mahi; but, from all I hear, I am
apprehensive that that general will make no defence, and that Gallicia will fall into
the hands of the enemy.”
SECTION 10.

“May 7, 1811.
“Your lordship will have observed, in my recent reports of the state of the
Portuguese force, that their numbers are much reduced, and I don’t know what
measure to recommend which will have the effect of restoring them. All measures
recommended to the existing government in Portugal are either rejected, or are
neglected, or are so executed as to be of no use whatever; and the countenance
which the prince regent of Portugal has given to the governors of the kingdom,
who have uniformly manifested this spirit of opposition to every thing proposed for
the increase of the resources of the government and the amelioration of their
military system, must tend to aggravate these evils. The radical defect, both in
Spain and Portugal, is want of money to carry on the ordinary operations of the
government, much more to defray the expenses of such a war as that in which we
are engaged.”
“I have not received the consent of Castaños and Blake to the plan of co-
operation which I proposed for the siege of Badajos; and I have been obliged to
write to marshal Beresford to desire him to delay the siege till they will positively
promise to act as therein specified, or till I can go to him with a reinforcement from
hence.”
“Depend upon it that Portugal should be the foundation of all your operations in
the Peninsula, of whatever nature they may be, upon which point I have never
altered my opinion. If they are to be offensive, and Spain is to be the theatre of
them, your commander must be in a situation to be entirely independent of all
Spanish authorities; by which means alone he will be enabled to draw some
resources from the country and some assistance from the Spanish armies.”

SECTION 11.

“May 22, 1811.


“On the night of the 15th instant I received, from marshal sir William Beresford,
letters of the 12th and 13th instant, which reported that marshal Soult had broken
up from Seville about the 10th, and had advanced towards Estremadura,
notwithstanding the reports which had been previously received, that he was busily
occupied in strengthening Seville, and the approaches to that city, by works, and
that all his measures indicated an intention to remain on the defensive in
Andalusia.”

SECTION 12.
Letter from sir J. Moore to major-general M’Kenzie, commanding in Portugal.

Salamanca, 29th November, 1808.


sir,
The armies of Spain, commanded by generals Castaños and Blake, the one in
Biscay and the other in Arragon, have been beaten and dispersed. This renders
my junction with sir David Baird’s corps impracticable, but if it were, I cannot hope,
with the British alone, to withstand the formidable force which France has brought
against this country; and there is nothing else now in Spain to make head against
it.
I have ordered sir David Baird to fall back on Coruña, re-embark, and proceed to
the Tagus; I myself, with the corps which marched from Lisbon, mean to retire by
Ciudad Rodrigo or Almeida, and, by taking up such positions as offer, endeavour
to defend, for a time, the frontier of Portugal, and cover Lisbon. But, looking
forward that this cannot be done for any considerable time against superior
numbers, it becomes necessary for me to give you this notice, that you may
embark the stores of the army, keeping on shore as little as possible that may
impede a re-embarkation of the whole army both now with you and that which I am
bringing.
We shall have great difficulties on the frontier for subsistence; colonel Murray
wrote on this subject to colonel Donkin yesterday, that supplies might be sent for
us to Abrantes and Coimbra. Some are already at Oporto, and more may be sent.
I have desired sir D. Baird, if he has with him a victualler, of small draft of water, to
send her there. On the subject of provisions the commissary-general will write
more in detail, and I hope you will use your influence with the government of
Portugal to secure its aid and assistance. It will be right to consider with the
Portuguese officers and engineers what points may be immediately strengthened
and are most defensible, and what use you can make of the troops with you to
support me in my defence of the frontiers, and I shall be glad to hear from you
upon this subject. I cannot yet determine the line I shall take up, but generally it will
be Almeida, Guarda, Belmonte, Baracal, Celerico, Viseu. The Portuguese, on their
own mountains, can be of much use, and I should hope, at any rate, that they will
defend the Tras os Montes. Mr. Kennedy will probably write to Mr. Erskine, who
now had better remain at Lisbon; but, if he does not write to him, this, together with
colonel Murray’s letter to colonel Donkin, will be sufficient for you and Mr. Erskine
to take means for securing to us not only a supply of biscuit and salt provisions,
but the supplies of the country for ourselves and horses, &c. In order to alarm as
little as possible, it may be said that more troops are expected from England, to
join us through Portugal: this will do at first, but gradually the truth will, of course,
be known. I am in great want of money, and nothing else will secure the aid of the
country.
I have the honour to be, &c.
J. Moore.
P.S. Elvas should be provisioned.
No. III.

EXTRACTS FROM THE CORRESPONDENCE OF A FIELD-


O F F I C E R O F E N G I N E E R S , E M P L O Y E D AT C A D I Z .

SECTION 1.

“May 7, 1810.
“We have at last broke ground for some works, but I am almost at a loss to
explain to you the cause of our delay. The truth is, we left England so ill provided
with tools and other requisites for beginning works that till lately it has been
positively impossible to commence, even on a small scale, from our own resources
and number of men. These facts, with the backwardness of the Spaniards to
contribute either stores or workmen to the general cause, has kept us so long
inactive. We have now one thousand three hundred men at work, and the Board of
Ordnance has supplied us with more tools.”

SECTION 2.

“Isla, June 1, 1810.


“We might defy the power of France to expel us by force from hence if all were
done that might be done, or even what is projected, but we have only British troops
at work on this important position, and our numbers will not permit the progress
which the exigency of affairs requires.”—“We have in our respected general
(Graham) a confidence which is daily on the increase. He has a mind and temper
well adapted to encounter difficulties which less favoured dispositions could not
bear. We may possibly maintain our ground. If we do, although our success may
have none of the brilliancy of victory, yet his merits, who, by patience, prudence,
and self-possession, shall have kept all quiet within our lines, preserved tolerable
harmony, and kept an enterprizing enemy off with very inadequate means, should
be rewarded by his country’s good opinion, although none but those who have
witnessed can fully estimate the value of his exertions. On the whole, our situation
may be said to inspire hope, though not security: to animate resistance, though not
to promise victory.”

SECTION 3.

“June 29, 1810.


“I have been attending a committee of Spanish engineers and artillery officers,
to settle some determinate plan for taking up the ground near the town of La Isla;
but they will enter into no views which include the destruction of a house or
garden. They continue to propose nothing but advanced batteries upon the marsh
in front of the town, the evident object of which is to keep the shells of the enemy
rather farther from the houses. At a general attack, all this would be lost and
carried, by small parties coming in on the flanks and gorges. Instead of deepening
the ditches and constructing good redoubts at every seven hundred yards, this is
what they propose, although we offer to perform the labour for them. On a barren
spot they will agree to our working; but of what service is one redoubt, if
unsupported by a collateral defence, and if a general system is not attended to.
We have now been here three months, and although they have been constantly
urged to construct something at that weak tongue of low land, St. Petri, still nothing
of importance is begun upon, nor do I imagine they will agree to any work of
strength at that point. I am almost in despair of seeing this place strongly fortified,
so as to resist an army of from fifty to one hundred thousand men, which I am
convinced it is capable of.”—“We have now one thousand three hundred labourers
of the line and eighty carpenters, but, for the latter, the timber we are supplied with
from our ally, is so bad that these artificers produce not more than one-fifth or one-
sixth what they would be capable of if the materials were good. To judge from their
conduct it is impossible to suppose them determined to oppose a vigorous
resistance even in La Isla, and I have no idea of there ever being a siege of Cadiz
itself.”—“Of our seven subalterns of engineers two are generally ill; we are obliged,
therefore, to get assistance from the line. The consequence is that the work is
neither so well nor so speedily executed. We ought to have many more
(engineers). It is not economy in the governments; and with Lord Wellington they
have hardly any with the army.”

EXTRACTS FROM THE OFFICIAL ABSTRACT OF


M I L I TA R Y R E P O R T S F R O M T H E B R I T I S H C O M M A N D E R S
AT C A D I Z .

SECTION 4.

General William Stewart, March 13, 1810.


“The enemy’s force was supposed to be diminished, but no advantage could be
taken of it, on account of the inefficient state of the Spanish troops.”

General Graham, March 26, 1810.


“The isle of Leon required for its defence a larger force than had been assigned.
Its tenure was, in the then state of the defences, very precarious.”

May, 1810.
“General Blake, appointed to command the Spanish forces, introduced some
degree of activity and co-operation, in which the Spaniards had been very
deficient.”

October, 1810.
“The progress made by the enemy at the Trocadero assumed a very formidable
character; while the Spaniards persisted in their apathy, and neglected to fortify the
most vulnerable points of their line.”

General Graham to lord Liverpool, Cadiz, January 2, 1811.


“——As far as the exertions of the British engineers and soldiers under my
command have been concerned, I have every reason to be satisfied. I can by no
means say the same of the Spaniards, for, besides the reluctance with which some
of the most essential measures of the defence were agreed to, our people were
not permitted to carry into execution the plan for the intrenchment of the left part of
the Cortadura de St. Fernando until after much delay and very unpleasant
contests.”

You might also like