Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

PROCESS FEE FORM

IN THE COURT OF MS. POONAM SINGH, LD. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIST


CLASS( NI ACT)-01, ROOM NO. 43,PATIALA HOUSE COURT COMPLEX, NEW
DELHI
CC NI ACT 7380/2022
CLIX CAPITAL SERVICES PVT LTD VERSUS HAPANI PARESHBHAI V
LDOH: -25.04.2024 NDOH: -
DATE OF FILED BY PURPOSE NUMBE AMOUNT OF P. COURT
FILING WHOM OF FILING R FEE FEE
AFFIXED

HAPANI PARESHBHAI V
S/O: VINODBHAI
LAVJIBHAINHAPANI
Counsel for the BWS R/O: A-403, NAVKAR
Complainant ISSUED RESIDENCY, KAMRAJ
NAVAGAM, SURAT
GUJARAT-394185
MOB: 9173121477,8200577693
EMAIL:
pareshhapani79@gmail.com
GUJARAT-395008

SHAILENDRA BHATNAGAR & ASSOCIATES


U-20, BASEMENT, GREEN PARK EXTENSION, NEW DELHI – 110016
MOB: - 9711161241, 9999839185
EMAIL: - bhim@sbassociates.in
scjoshi1969@gmail.com

IN THE COURT OF MS. POONAM SINGH, LD. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIST


CLASS( NI ACT)-01, ROOM NO. 43,PATIALA HOUSE COURT COMPLEX, NEW
DELHI
CC NI ACT 7380/2022
CLIX CAPITAL SERVICES PVT LTD VERSUS HAPANI PARESHBHAI V
LDOH: - 25.04.2024 NDOH: -
DOF: -
Purpose: - BWS ISSUED
AHLMAD/ASST.
IN THE COURT OF MS. POONAM SINGH, LD. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIST
CLASS( NI ACT)-01, ROOM NO. 43,PATIALA HOUSE COURT COMPLEX, NEW
DELHI
DATE OF ORDER
DATE OF ISSUE
NEXT DATE OF HEARING
PS
CC NO.
CASE TITLE

SUMMONS TO AN ACCUSED PERSON U/S 138 NI ACT


(section 68 of the code of criminal procedure, schedule II, form 1)
TO,

WHEREAS your attendance is necessary to answer to a charge u/s. 138 NI Act whereby the
cheque issued by you in favour of the complainant towards legally enforceable debt/liability
has been dishonoured.
You are hereby required to appear in person, with or without pleader,
before the court on _________________ at 10:00 A.M. Herein Fail not.
Accused can make an application for compounding of the offence at the first
and second hearing of the case and if such an application is made, compounding may be
allowed by the Court without imposing any costs on the accused.

AFFIXATION

In case the house of the accused is found to be locked, the process server is directed to affix a
copy of the summons at some conspicuous place at the house of the accused.

NOTE: In terms of judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Damodar S Prabhu
vs. Sayed Babalal H., (2010) 5 SCC 663 You are hereby informed that you can make an
application for compounding of the offence at the first or second hearing of the case and in
that case, compounding may be allowed by the court without imposing any cost.

Note: Cheque Amount:


SEAL ss Judicial Magistrate

You might also like