Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full download Women’s Human Rights: A Social Psychological Perspective on Resistance, Liberation, and Justice Shelly Grabe file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download Women’s Human Rights: A Social Psychological Perspective on Resistance, Liberation, and Justice Shelly Grabe file pdf all chapter on 2024
Psychological Perspective on
Resistance, Liberation, and Justice
Shelly Grabe
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmass.com/product/womens-human-rights-a-social-psychological-perspe
ctive-on-resistance-liberation-and-justice-shelly-grabe/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
https://ebookmass.com/product/foundations-of-social-policy-
social-justice-in-human-perspective-amanda-s-barusch/
https://ebookmass.com/product/empowerment-series-foundations-of-
social-policy-social-justice-in-human-perspective-6th-edition-
ebook-pdf/
https://ebookmass.com/product/human-dignity-and-social-justice-
pablo-gilabert/
https://ebookmass.com/product/just-responsibility-a-human-rights-
theory-of-global-justice-brooke-a-ackerly/
Trans Women and HIV: Social Psychological Perspectives
1st ed. Edition Rusi Jaspal
https://ebookmass.com/product/trans-women-and-hiv-social-
psychological-perspectives-1st-ed-edition-rusi-jaspal/
https://ebookmass.com/product/artificial-intelligence-social-
harms-and-human-rights-ales-zavrsnik/
https://ebookmass.com/product/indigenous-peoples-and-climate-
justice-a-critical-analysis-of-international-human-rights-law-
and-governance-giada-giacomini/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-american-convention-on-human-
rights-a-commentary-ludovic-hennebel/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-african-charter-on-human-and-
peoples-rights-a-commentary-rachel-murray/
Women’s Human Rights
Women’s Human Rights
A Social Psychological Perspective
on Resistance, Liberation, and Justice
1
1
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers
the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education
by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University
Press in the UK and certain other countries.
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Printed by Sheridan Books, Inc., United States of America
ABOUT THE ARTIST
Preface ix
Contributors xiii
Introduction: The Potential for a Feminist Liberation Psychology
in the Advancement of Women’s Human Rights xv
viii | Contents
PREFACE
x | Preface
more credibility with people in positions of power. I have since collected
and disseminated data based on large-scale mixed-methods investigations,
conducted in partnership with grassroots organizations in Nicaragua and
later Tanzania, that document how processes of power impact women’s
human rights (Grabe, 2010, 2012, 2015; Grabe & Arenas, 2009; Grabe &
Dutt, 2015; Grabe, Dutt, & Dworkin, 2014; Grabe, Grose, & Dutt, 2015;
Grose & Grabe, 2014). More recently, in partnership with Nicaraguan
activists, I produced a book that analyzes testimonies of women’s resis-
tance to the intersecting powers of patriarchy and neoliberalism in the pur-
suit of women’s rights (Grabe, 2017).
Despite my growing focus on scholar-activism, when Abby Gross,
the psychology editor from Oxford University Press (OUP), approached
me to consider writing a book on women’s issues in psychology I ini-
tially rebuffed the inquiry. I informed her that the research in which
I was engaged had not stemmed from my academic training as a clinical
psychologist, but rather from my commitment as an activist. For those
reasons I understood my work to exist at the margins of academic scholar-
ship and I viewed OUP as existing anywhere but at the margins. I shared
with Abby that I had entered my research relationships with no formal
training in feminist studies or international psychology and rather, had
learned a women of color, decolonial, and rural feminism from activ-
ists in Nicaragua that continues to influence most of the work I do today.
Thus, as I became involved in research on women’s rights I violated the
traditions of mainstream social science by not arriving with ready-made
theories or an agenda driven from the literature. I went into my research
partnerships, though unaware at the time of something called “scholar-
activism,” to use my tools and training in active engagement with and in
the service of a progressive social movement (Sudbury & Okazawa-Rey,
2009). When I explained this to Abby I suspected it was a deal-breaker;
but after listening carefully, she said something to the effect of, “That’s a
great story; write about that,” and told me that she had strategically looked
for an author who could produce cutting-edge work that would move the
field forward; our meeting was no accident.
Oxford’s interest in cutting-edge work produced from within psychol-
ogy provides an exciting opportunity in this volume. One challenge to
advancing social justice and scholarship in the area of women’s human
rights has stemmed from a lack of comprehensive analysis of the mecha-
nisms by which women’s status puts them at risk for violations of their
basic rights and how these circumstances can be transformed. Even though
research psychologists (with exceptions; Lykes, Brabeck, Ferns, & Radan,
Preface | xi
1993) have not contributed substantively to the advancement of women’s
human rights, the perspectives and methods offered by the discipline of
psychology have the potential to uncover how structural and ideological
conditions function to threaten women’s rights and to analyze how the
resistance and grassroots efforts of local change agents can be best used in
the defense of human rights.
References
xii | Preface
CONTRIBUTORS
xvi | Introduction
for the Advancement of Women and at removing all the obstacles to wom-
en’s active participation in all spheres of public and private life through a
full and equal share in economic, social, cultural and political decision-
making. This means that the principle of shared power and responsibility
should be established between women and men at home, in the workplace
and in the wider national and international communities. Equality between
women and men is a matter of human rights and a condition for social jus-
tice and is also a necessary and fundamental prerequisite for equality, devel-
opment and peace. A transformed partnership based on equality between
women and men is a condition for people-centered sustainable develop-
ment. A sustained and long-term commitment is essential, so that women
and men can work together for themselves, for their children and for society
to meet the challenges of the twenty-first century.
Introduction | xvii
universalizes women’s experiences (Alexander & Mohanty, 1997; Grewal
& Kaplan, 1994; Naples & Desai, 2002). Transnational feminism arose
during the 1980s out of the interplay between global and local practices
influenced by neoliberalism that were denying women’s rights, permitting
exploitation, and reproducing subjugation, regardless of the respective
location or country (Alexander & Mohanty, 1997; Naples & Desai, 2002).
In contrast, the Western model of feminism that has traditionally been
cited and exported internationally has largely been a white, middle-class
feminism focused on power imbalances that are rooted primarily in gen-
der. Given the multiplicity of knowledge and practices that emerge from
a transnational perspective, feminist scholars interested in an inclusive
vision of rights for women underscore that there is and must be a diversity
of feminisms—responsive to the varying needs and concerns of women
throughout the world and defined by them for themselves (Sen & Grown,
1987). To be clear, because transnational feminism involves understanding
gender in the context of unfavorable global systems, this perspective can
and should also be applied when conducting research in the United States.
In another example of a grounded and inclusive agenda, many scholars,
including some in psychology, have urged thinking beyond the homog-
enization of the category “gender” to understand the intersectional effects
that other social locations related to power—such as race/ethnicity, sex-
ual orientation, and social class—have on women’s lives (Cole, 2009;
Crenshaw, 1989; Hare-Mustin & Marecek, 1994; Hurtado, 1989). In other
words, it has become increasingly clear that gender must be understood in
the context of power relations embedded in multiple social categories. As
important as the growing use of intersectional approaches to the study of
gender and power within psychology has been (Bowleg, 2008; Cole, 2009;
Fine & Sirin, 2007; Hurtado, 1989; Hurtado & Sinha, 2008; Mahalingam,
Balan, & Haritatos, 2008; Stewart & McDermott, 2004), many initial
investigations have reflected a largely Western bias. In addition to the
other dimensions of social location that are often of focus in a US context,
transnational and decolonial feminist scholars suggest that women’s expe-
rience is also inextricably linked to the systemic inequities of global power
(e.g., colonialism, globalization; Bose, 2012; Grabe, Grose, & Dutt, 2015;
Lugones, 2010; Narayan, 1997; Sen & Grown, 1987). Therefore, psycho-
logical investigation into women’s human rights needs to take into account
the theoretical frameworks offered by third world feminisms,2 which
argue that gender oppression operates through unfavorable social systems
such as global power that exacerbate or maintain violations of women’s
human rights (Crenshaw, 1989; Lugones, 2007; Sen & Grown, 1987). The
xviii | Introduction
attention given to women’s human rights in this volume is therefore not
rooted in the notion that women have universal experiences; rather it is
rooted in a shared criticism of and resistance to how policies and soci-
etal practices create structural conditions that limit women’s rights in their
respective communities and locations.
Because a main tenet of transnational feminism involves critique of
how systems of global power exacerbate or sustain gender oppression, a
focus on social structures and systems of power in understanding wom-
en’s rights violations and social justice is crucial. For example, across
countries and cultures, one of the most ubiquitous group-based inequali-
ties is based on gender, whereby men and women hold different roles
that reflect the bias of male structural and social power (Pratto, Sidanius,
Stallworth, & Malle, 1994). A quick glance at international data immedi-
ately demonstrates that almost without exception women everywhere in
the world, regardless of race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, income level,
and so forth, are, on average, disadvantaged by power differentials and
are in more subordinate positions than are men (Acosta-Belen & Bose,
1990). For example, globally, women hold only 22% of seats in national
parliaments (UN, 2016). International percentages of women in parlia-
ment range from a high of around 41% in Nordic countries, to 27% and
24% in the Americas and Europe, respectively, to 18% in Arab states
(UN, 2016). It has also been consistently demonstrated across the world,
including in the United States, that women’s earnings are approximately
70% of men’s earnings (UN, 2010a). Similar findings, which have been
static since the 1970s, suggest that women perform 66% of the world’s
work, but earn around 10% of the income and own around 1% of the
world’s property (UN, 2010b).
Feminist authors from the majority world have articulated that gendered
“public” space (i.e., male dominated)—a key to power, privilege, oppor-
tunities, and wealth—limits and controls women’s access to resources
and hinders women’s ability to administer laws that protect their rights
(Tamale, 2004). The theory of gender and power (Connell, 1987) postu-
lates that gender-based inequalities are pervasive societal characteristics
that result in men’s disproportionate power in society. The lack of women
in powerful positions in the United States, in particular, was exemplified
in the media when the first Latina, and third woman ever, was appointed
to the Supreme Court of the United States in 2009. During a news inter-
view with the white political commentator Pat Buchanan (who served as
a senior US advisor during the Nixon, Ford, and Reagan administrations),
the white female talk show host Rachael Maddow asked Buchanan, “Why
Introduction | xix
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
to “look in” on the wonders of the unique aviary, with its valuable
illustrations of the “History of Red Riding Hood,” its bright jay’s
feathers, and other childish treasures!
Heartily the little Mary laughed; and so the Christmas evening
passed on.
“I must go now,” she said; “I promised to read mother the pretty story
you gave me, ‘Simple Susan,’ and they will all sit up for it! Good bye!
You will promise not to be so sad when I am gone as you were when
I came in. You have been thinking of that pretty lady again!” she
said, with a face of anxious love—pointing to the miniature—“that
makes you so, I know! Why don’t you go to her?”
“Because she does not love me, Mary,” was the faltering reply; “and
you know we are not happy with those who do not love us.”
“Are you sure of that?” said the child, earnestly. “People often hide
their kindest thoughts—and perhaps she hides hers from you; you
must look for them, as I look for violets, in their thick leaves. Oh, I
was so unhappy once!” she continued, tears starting into her eyes at
the remembrance: “I quarrelled with my brother, and we did not
speak all day—both were so proud: but do you know” (and the sweet
little face sparkled) “that when I put my arms round his neck and
kissed him, and said, ‘Good night, Harry!’ he kissed me, and cried
too; and said how unhappy he had been all the time. I had thought
he would never, never love me again! Oh! if my brother had died, as
baby did, before we kissed each other that night!”
Poor little Mary paused, her heart quite full at the bare idea of such a
thing; but she turned again, with admiring eyes, to the miniature.
“She looks very kind and good, and so beautiful! Did you speak
gently, and ask her to love you again: or were you proud?”
The child did not notice the agitation of her companion, and little did
she imagine that, long after her head lay softly on her happy pillow,
the simple eloquence of those Magic Words was working powerfully
in his heart!
CHAPTER II.
Over many a mile of hard, frosty road, by snow-clad fields and hills
and woods, by many an ice-bound stream, must we lead the
imagination of our reader on the evening of the same Christmas Day,
and peep into another home, far from that we have just quitted.
Undrawing the warm crimson curtains of a charming little room—half
drawing-room, half library—the light of a lamp falls brightly on the
figure of a lady reading to her husband. It is manuscript, and he puts
the pages by for her as she goes on.
She often pauses, to look up with a delighted smile at his praises,
and he thinks that she never looked so beautiful before! She is very
like Correggio’s Magdalen, and has the same lovely countenance
and waving hair.
Presently she came to the last page, and the praise was repeated.
“I had no idea I could translate so well,” said she, “and am glad you
like it, for that will give me spirits to go on: I may, in time, become
quite useful to you.”
“When are you not everything to me?” was the reply. “But, Marion,
you must not work so hard; I cannot afford to see you look one bit
less bright. Besides, it is a kind of reproach to me your working so
much; indeed you must not!”
“Nonsense!” said Marion, laughing; “you can’t think how happy I am
when helping you, for I am sure you are often very weary! Poor
Edward! what anxiety I have caused you! Now for a volley of
protestations!” said she, laughing again. “But to be serious: I was
thinking, to-day, how much we have to be thankful for; and that with
all its anxieties how happy this year has been—how infinitely
happier, working and striving on together, than droning through an
insipid life of ease, as some do. I don’t know what would become of
me if you were ever to be rich,” she continued; “to be sure, one might
always find some useful employment, some good to be done; but no
one knows, except those who have experienced it, the delight of
overcoming difficulties, and earning home comforts by one’s own
exertions.”
“True, dear Marion! I never knew, until I knew you, how little is
necessary for happiness!”
“I knew what life was—I had an anxious one at home, even from a
little child,” said Marion, “and adversity taught me to know what is
best worth knowing; what flowers to gather in this great garden, that
many neglect, or do not perceive. How sweet are the uses of
adversity! I love to linger on those words; and if ever I venture to
write an essay,” said she, smiling, “it shall be on that subject. What
does it not teach us?—the practice of almost every virtue.”
“Nay, not quite so far, enthusiast,” said her husband, smiling;
“remember the effect of almost constant sun on flowers; how
splendid they become—how fully their beauty is developed!”
“Yes; but they cannot bear the storm that may, that must come. The
stout old thistle, reared in cold and sleet, is much better off—much
more useful, and protects many a little plant under its vigorous
leaves. Now, only think what adversity really does for us. To begin
with my early life:—my father and mother treated me as their friend
in all their troubles; I was accustomed to watch their anxious care-
worn faces, to try to cheer them, and to rejoice when they
brightened: this bound us together in the closest affection; I believe
no child, no parents, were ever so dear to each other. No little home
was ever so loved as mine; and I was quite broken-hearted when
away from all its cares, even for a short time, although in the midst of
what people called enjoyment. These were very different feelings
from those of children nursed in the lap of affluence, who are
frequently selfish, and often but little attached to those around them.
I knew what it was to be deprived of many comforts, which made me
grateful for those I had, and taught me to feel for the sufferings of
others infinitely worse off than myself. Naturally impetuous, I grew up
patient; for, as you know, my father was a man of eccentric genius,
who failed in all his efforts to place us in the brilliant position he
dreamed of. I felt and shared in his disappointments, until
disappointment itself became powerless! Sympathy with those I
loved roused me to exertion—taught me the value of time—the
dignity of usefulness! But, above all, the frowns of the world, the
sweet uses of adversity, made me feel the dear necessity of clinging
to and loving one another, and of living in that ‘peace which passeth
all understanding!’”
Marion paused, and looked with inexpressible tenderness on her
husband.
“I do not believe we should have loved each other half so well if we
had not borne so much anxiety together,” she presently continued,
“although it would be a dangerous experiment for those to try, who
never knew what care was! We very coolly stepped into its troubled
waters. What straits we have been in! There is really some
amusement, though, in looking back to a hundred comical little
difficulties, mingled with graver trials; in peeping into the crowded
picture-gallery of one’s own life—grave and gay! Do you remember
when we were so very poor, and your father’s friends, the Saviles,
condescended to drive over to luncheon with us?”
“Oh, yes,” said Edward, laughing; “when poor old Jock behaved so
inconsiderately!”
“Inconsiderately, indeed,” said Marion, laughing too. “I shall never
forget seeing him swallow the delicacies which I had prepared with
so much care, in the coolest manner possible, looking me hard in the
face all the time. I was in an agony to see the ham sandwiches
disappear one after another down his huge throat (knowing there
were no more in the house, too), while the capricious fine lady who
took a fancy to feed him, drawled out, ‘the d-e-a-r d-o-g! how he li-
kes them!’ I should think he did, indeed, with his appetite! I do
believe, though, Mr. Edward, that, like all men, you rather enjoyed
the scene than otherwise; for you never offered to put the cruel old
dog out of the room.”
“How could I tear him from the flattering attentions of his Patroness?
But let me see; how did you manage it, Marion? I dare say very
ingeniously and gracefully. I remember how proud I felt of you that
day.”
“Oh, I appeared to enter into the amusement and drollery of his
enormous appetite, but suggested, in the most affectionate manner
possible, that he should bow his thanks to the fair lady before tasting
another morsel! Poor Jock, who had not the slightest acquaintance
with any feat or accomplishment of the kind, was all amazement at
my gestures and commands, and only stared hard for more;
whereupon he was gently ‘fie-fied,’ and put out of the room for his
obstinacy and ingratitude!”
Day & Son, lithrs to the Queen.