Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Effect of spray aeration on organics and nitrogen removal in vertical wetland
Effect of spray aeration on organics and nitrogen removal in vertical wetland
Chemosphere
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/chemosphere
Technical Note
h i g h l i g h t s
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The objective of present study was to assess the simultaneous removal of organics and nitrogen by four
Received 7 May 2014 lab-scale vertical subsurface flow constructed wetlands (V-SFCWs). The emergent plants employed were
Received in revised form 25 August 2014 Canna indica. Five-month experiments showed that the planted and aerated system largely reduced the
Accepted 27 August 2014
COD by 95%, NH4 by 88% and total inorganic nitrogen (TIN) by 83%. It outperformed the unplanted or
Available online 26 September 2014
simple aerated system and was much better than non-aerated system. The study provided a strong
Handling Editor: O. Hao evidence to support widespread research and application of spray aeration as a low-cost and energy-ef-
ficient aeration technology in V-SFCWs.
Keywords: Ó 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Vertical subsurface flow constructed
wetland
Spray aeration
Nitrogen removal
Organics removal
Nitrification
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.08.084
0045-6535/Ó 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Y. Ding et al. / Chemosphere 117 (2014) 502–505 503
the operational cost but also creates different micro-environments took 5 months (May to September in 2013) and operated in inter-
for effective nitrogen removal. Moreover, spray aeration is much mittent way with hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 3 d.
energy-saving than continuous mode. The information on the The four systems were operated under different conditions.
application of spray aeration in wetland systems as well as its Systems A (control) and B were not planted while C and D were
effect on the performance of wetland systems is few now, which planted with Canna indica. Two wastewater distributing pipes with
hinders the proper design of CWs and limits its popularity three spraying nozzles were installed at the top of B and D with a
(Brown et al., 2004; Ochowiak and Press, 2011). Therefore, more spray rate of 0.8 ± 0.2 L min1. The distributing pipe (id 2 cm,
detailed research is necessary for better understanding the effect length 50 cm) and spraying nozzle (d 1.5 cm) could generate
of spray aeration on wastewater treatment. atomization spray effect with a coverage area of 0.5–4.0 m2. Spray
The main purpose of this paper was to evaluate the perfor- aeration was controlled by a flow controller which could prevent
mance of four wetland systems to obtain optimal conditions under the influents from spraying outside the systems. One lateral perfo-
which efficient organics and nitrogen removal occurs. The effects rated pipe was inserted into the filter layer of A and C with a stable
of spray aeration and plants, especially the combination of the inflow rate of 0.8 ± 0.2 L min1. Linear flow distribution was
two on the simultaneous removal of organics and nitrogen were 50 L h1. The total inflow of four systems was 100 L within 2 h.
analyzed for domestic wastewater treatment. The influent was prepared in a feed tank by dissolving ammonium
nitrate and glucose with tap water. The characteristics of influents
were COD, 128 ± 7 mg L1; NH4–N, 13 ± 2 mg L1; NO3–N,
2. Materials and methods 4.2 ± 1.4 mg L1; TIN, 18 ± 2 mg L1; Dissolved Oxygen (DO),
6.5 ± 0.5 mg L1.
2.1. Configuration and operation of the wetland systems
2.2. Sampling and analysis
Experiments were carried out in four lab-scale V-SFCWs with
identical dimensions, hereafter named system A, B, C and D. The
Water samples from influent, effluent and sampling spots were
four systems were located indoor and had been operated for two
collected at HRT of 3 d to evaluate treatment performance of four
years. The air temperature was controlled at 25 ± 3 °C. Fig. 1 shows
systems in removing organics and nitrogen. Experiments were
the schematic diagram of the V-SFCWs. The dimension for each
repeated three times. Data were recorded by averaging the testing
wetland system was 60 cm in length, 60 cm in width and 75 cm
values of repeated measurements. COD was measured by using a
in depth. The bottom of each wetland system was filled with
HACH colorimeter (DR/890, USA). NO3, NH4 and TIN were analyzed
15 cm coarse gravel (U = 3–4 cm) which served as the drainage
using a gas-phase absorption spectrometer (GMA3202, China).
layer, and above which was a 45 cm filter layer filled with medium
Temperature and DO were measured simultaneously after sam-
gravel (U = 1–2 cm). Finally, a 10 cm covering layer of washed sand
pling by a HANNA DO meter (HI 9143, Italy).
(U < 0.2 cm) was added at the top, facilitating the dispersion of
Data analysis and visualization were completed using built-in
wastewater and plants growth. Four sampling spots at the depth
statistical functions of Origin 8.0 analysis software (OriginLab,
of 10 (S1), 25 (S2), 40 (S3) and 55 (S4) cm from the bottom were
MA, USA). All data were presented as mean ± SD. Statistical checks
tapped along systems, among which S1 was the outlet of V-SFCWs.
was made at significance of 0.01 for all analyses.
The emergent plants employed in this study were Canna indica
which were transferred from Shanghai Chen Shan Botanical
Garden (31°040 N, 121°100 E), China. The planting density for the 3. Results and discussion
emergent plants was about two plants per m2. Before the experi-
ment, Hogland’s solution was fed for cultivation. The formal 3.1. DO profile along V-SFCWs
experiment was performed after two months of stable plant
growth, during which the micro-organic communities adapted to Fig. 2a showed the DO profile in V-SFCWs. Obvious differences
the wetland environment and had been fully developed. Effluents between the aerated systems (B and D) and non-aerated systems
were tested until water quality became stable. The experiments (A and C) were observed (P < 0.01). As shown in Fig. 2a, DO concen-
Table 1
Treatment performance of the four wetland systems.
Parameters Influent (mg L1) System Effluent (mg L1) Removal (%)
COD 128 ± 7 A 17 ± 5 87
B 9±5 93
C 14 ± 5 89
D 7±4 95
NH4–N 13 ± 2 A 8±1 40
B 2±1 84
C 6±1 52
D 2±1 88
NO3–N 4.2 ± 1.4 A .03 ± .08 99
B 2.0 ± 0.7 53
C .04 ± .06 99
D 2.0 ± 0.8 50
TIN 18 ± 2 A 8±2 55
B 4±2 76
C 8±2 59
D 3±2 83
References Maltais-Landry, G., Maranger, R., Brisson, J., Chazarenc, F., 2009b. Nitrogen
transformations and retention in planted and artificially aerated constructed
wetlands. Water Res. 43, 535–545.
Brix, H., 1997. Do macrophytes play a role in constructed treatment wetlands?
Nikolausz, M., Kappelmeyer, U., Székely, A., Rusznyák, A., Márialigeti, K., Kästner, M.,
Water Sci. Technol. 35, 11–17.
2008. Diurnal redox fluctuation and microbial activity in the rhizosphere of
Brown, R.B., Carter, M.H., Stephenson, G.R., 2004. Buffer zone and windbreak effects
wetland plants. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 44, 324–333.
on spray drift deposition in a simulated wetland. Pest Manage. Sci. 60, 1085–
Ong, S.-A., Uchiyama, K., Inadama, D., Ishida, Y., Yamagiwa, K., 2010. Performance
1090.
evaluation of laboratory scale up-flow constructed wetlands with different
Dong, C., Zhu, W., Zhao, Y.Q., Gao, M., 2011. Diurnal fluctuations in root oxygen
designs and emergent plants. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 7239–7244.
release rate and dissolved oxygen budget in wetland mesocosm. Desalination
Ochowiak, M., Press, L.B., 2011. The flow resistance and aeration in modified spray
272, 254–258.
tower. Chem. Eng. Process. 50, 345–350.
Dong, H., Qiang, Z., Li, T., Jin, H., Chen, W., 2012. Effect of artificial aeration on the
Stefanakis, A.I., Tsihrintzis, V.A., 2009. Performance of pilot-scale vertical flow
performance of vertical-flow constructed wetland treating heavily polluted
constructed wetlands treating simulated municipal wastewater: effect of
river water. J. Environ. Sci. 24, 596–601.
various design parameters. Desalination 248, 752–770.
Ding, Y., Song, X.S., Wang, Y.H., Yan, D.H., 2012. Effects of dissolved oxygen and
Saeed, T., Sun, G.Z., 2011. Enhanced denitrification and organics removal in hybrid
influent COD/N ratios on nitrogen removal in horizontal subsurface flow
wetland columns: comparative experiments. Bioresour. Technol. 102, 967–974.
constructed wetland. Ecol. Eng. 46, 107–111.
Tang, X., Huang, S., Scholz, M., 2008. Nutrient removal in wetlands during
Ding, Y., Song, X.S., Wang, Y.H., Yan, D.H., 2013. Effect of supplying a carbon
intermittent artificial aeration. Environ. Eng. Sci. 25, 1279–1290.
extracting solution on denitrification in horizontal subsurface flow constructed
Vymazal, J., 2005. Horizontal sub-surface flow and hybrid constructed wetlands
wetlands. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 30, 379–384.
systems for wastewater treatment. Ecol. Eng. 25, 478–490.
Ding, Y., Wang, W., Song, X.S., Wang, Y.H., 2014. Spatial distribution characteristics
Vymazal, J., 1999. Removal of BOD5 in constructed wetland with horizontal
of environmental parameters and nitrogenous compounds in horizontal
subsurface flow: CZECH experience. Water Sci. Technol. 40 (3), 133–138.
subsurface flow constructed wetland treating high nitrogen-content
Vymazal, J., 2007. Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands.
wastewater. Ecol. Eng. 70, 446–449.
Sci. Total Environ. 380, 48–65.
Li, F.M., Lu, L., Zheng, X., Ngo, H.H., Liang, S., Guo, W.S., Zhang, X.W., 2014. Enhanced
Yang, L., Chang, H.T., Huang, M.N.L., 2001. Nutrient removal in gravel- and soil-
nitrogen removal in constructed wetlands: effects of dissolved oxygen and step-
based wetland microcosms with and without vegetation. Ecol. Eng. 18, 91–105.
feeding. Bioresour. Technol. 169, 395–402.