Professional Documents
Culture Documents
0006_006 Loss Prevention Compliance Reviews
0006_006 Loss Prevention Compliance Reviews
CONTENT:
1 PURPOSE
2 SCOPE
3 COMPLIANCE REVIEW OBJECTIVES
4 RESPONSIBILITIES
5 SCHEDULING COMPLIANCE REVIEWS
6 COMPLIANCE REVIEW PROCEDURE
7 COMPLIANCE REVIEW REPORT
8 IMPLEMENTATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS
1.0 PURPOSE:
1.1 To provide guidelines relative to Saudi Aramco requirements to periodically conduct reviews
for compliance with the Company loss prevention policy statement per G.I. 5.002, "Loss
Prevention Policy Implementation", paragraph 4.13, and as detailed in the Corporate Loss
Prevention Manual, section 170, "Compliance Reviews".
2.0 SCOPE:
2.1 Compliance review program methodology and procedures.
2.4 Responsibilities of business lines, the Loss Prevention Department, the proponent department,
support departments and the compliance review chairman.
3.2 To emphasize parts of the loss prevention program that are working well.
3.4 To assess equipment and material deficiencies and recommend corrective actions.
3.5 To assess department and employee commitment to and participation in both Company and
departmental safety programs and recommend areas for improvement.
3.6 To review the implementation of recommendations made during previous compliance reviews.
3.7 To provide information to proponent management for improving the effectiveness of their loss
prevention program.
4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES:
4.1 Business Lines
4.1.1 Business line heads are responsible for nominating departments for compliance reviews,
as well as manager level employees (or above) to serve as chairmen for compliance
reviews. Business line heads will ensure that nominated chairmen are available full time
for the compliance reviews they chair.
4.2.1 The Loss Prevention Department shall be responsible for coordinating the compliance
review program. This coordination includes: scheduling the review; selection of the
review team chairman; identification of team members (from proponent, support and
Loss Prevention departments and in selected cases outside specialists groups) required
for each review; notifying the involved personnel; and preparation of review materials/
guidelines such as the format for the compliance review report and the interview
questionnaires.
4.2.2 The Loss Prevention Department shall be responsible for providing background
information on the proposed compliance review to the appointed chairman and team
members. The chairman and team members will also be briefed by Loss Prevention on
all aspects of the review (e.g. report format, categorization of recommendations as
"major", "moderate" or "minor" as outlined in paragraph 7.2).
4.3.1 The proponent department will provide review team members (from within their
department) with appropriate qualifications and experience as recommended by the Loss
Prevention Department. One of these team members shall be appointed as secretary of
the review team. It is recommended that the secretary be an experienced engineer who
is familiar with the operations to be reviewed.
4.3.2 The proponent department will provide access to the review team to inspect it's facilities,
interview it's employees and review it's documents as requested by the compliance
review chairman.
4.3.3 The proponent department shall provide logistical support to the review team as
appropriate. This may include items such as housing, food or meal allowances, office
space, a full-time dedicated clerk, and security permits.
4.3.4 The proponent department will implement (or resolve) and provide status reports on
review recommendations as outlined in section 8 of this G.I.
4.4.1 Support departments, such as those in the Engineering Organization, will provide
specialists to effectively support compliance reviews. Other organizations may also be
asked to provide specialists for compliance reviews and they should make every effort
to support these reviews.
4.5.1 The chairman shall have complete procedural freedom (within the general guidelines
provided by Loss Prevention during briefings before the review) to direct the course of
the review. For example, he may assign specific tasks to the members of the review team
or divide the review team into groups in order to efficiently utilize the expertise of the
members available to him.
4.5.2 The chairman, with assistance from the team secretary, shall finalize the findings of the
review team by the end of the review period, in the report format provided by Loss
Prevention during briefings prior to the review, and obtain concurring signatures from
all review team members. Under exceptional circumstances he shall allow a review team
member to record dissents and deviations from the majority view when signing the
report.
4.5.3 The chairman shall be responsible for providing the review report to the proponent
department and other organizations as outlined in section 7 of this G.I.
5.2 The Loss Prevention Department will review responses from business lines and compile the
final list of departments to be reviewed in the following year. Since the number of reviews is
limited, selection shall be based on such factors as criticality of operation, time since the last
review, and safety performance.
5.3 Based on nominations provided by business lines, the Loss Prevention Department will select
chairmen and confirm these selections with the management of the nominated persons. Where
possible, the chairman and the department to be reviewed should be from separate business
lines.
5.4 Dates for compliance reviews will be finalized and published by the Loss Prevention
Department as soon as practical after response from business lines has been received.
5.5 Depending on the function of the department to be reviewed, the Loss Prevention Department
will request other departments in the Company, or outside consultants, to provide support staff
for each review as appropriate. These requests shall be made as soon as practical after the
compliance review schedule is finalized.
5.6 Operating and support departments with significant exposure should be reviewed at intervals of
three to five years. A department may be reviewed at more frequent intervals, if warranted and
agreed to by the Loss Prevention Department and the management of the department involved.
6.2 To assess the items listed in section 6.1, the review shall consist of a detailed look into all areas
of loss prevention activity. Key people shall be interviewed, records and files reviewed,
procedures investigated, and key meetings shall be attended, if practical. In conducting the
review, checklists should be used as a reminder of things to look for, talk about, and/or review.
Such checklists will be provided by the Loss Prevention Department representatives.
6.3 Security and environmental assessments are beyond the scope of these compliance reviews.
However, since the liaison of plant operations with security personnel is important during
emergencies, the review shall confirm how a plant's emergency response plan interfaces with
plant security.
6.4 Where possible, the review team shall hold a simulated fire or disaster drill to assess response
capability and emergency control systems. This drill will need to be closely coordinated with
operations and other relevant departments. The nature of the drill will depend on the
department being reviewed.
7.2 The review recommendations shall be divided into "major", "moderate" and "minor" categories.
Generally, "major" recommendations will be those safety hazards which cite non-compliance
with Saudi Aramco G.I.s, standards, plant operating instruction manuals or the department loss
prevention program. However, the team has the prerogative of making other recommendations
if they feel it is warranted or if time prohibits a thorough comparison with "applicable"
standards.
7.3 All "major" and "moderate" recommendations shall be numbered and listed in the
"Recommendations" section of the report. An appendix to the report will include "minor"
recommendations and "punch list" items needing correction (i.e. housekeeping items, etc.).
7.4 A draft list of "major" recommendations shall be provided to the proponent department's
management for preliminary review.
7.5 The report will be addressed to the proponent department's manager, and "major"
recommendations will be discussed with the proponent department's management on the last
day of the review. The superintendent of the area Loss Prevention division shall be invited to
this review meeting.
7.6 Copies of the report will be provided to satisfy the reviewed department manager's distribution
requirements. Additionally, one copy of the report shall be provided to the Manager, Loss
Prevention Department, one copy to the area Loss Prevention superintendent, and one copy to
the administrative area head of the department being reviewed. The compliance review team
members shall be provided copies of the report upon request.
8.2 The proponent department will track the implementation (or resolution) of all recommendations.
8.3 The proponent department will provide status reports of the "major" recommendations to the
superintendent of the area Loss Prevention division every quarter until implemented or
otherwise resolved. These status reports may be in the form of minutes from SOC meetings in
which the recommendations are tracked, or they may be in a separate format.
8.4 Field verification of a sample of implemented compliance review recommendations (as reported
by proponent departments) will be formally done as part of the department's next compliance
review.
8.5 If the proponent department disagrees with or is unable to comply with a "major"
recommendation, a non-compliance letter shall be obtained from the proponent department's
administrative area head. This letter should state the justification for non-compliance. A copy
of this letter shall be forwarded to the Manager, Loss Prevention Department. If non-
compliance with Saudi Aramco engineering standards is involved it must be processed by
utilizing the waiver form SA-6409 (as outlined in Saudi Aramco Engineering Procedure 302).
Recommended:
Manager
Loss Prevention Department
Concurred:
Executive Director
Safety And Industrial Security
Approved:
President And Chief Executive Officer