Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Integration with Complex Numbers : A Primer on Complex Analysis Aisling Mccluskey full chapter instant download
Integration with Complex Numbers : A Primer on Complex Analysis Aisling Mccluskey full chapter instant download
https://ebookmass.com/product/undergraduate-analysis-a-working-
textbook-aisling-mccluskey/
https://ebookmass.com/product/data-wrangling-on-aws-clean-and-
organize-complex-data-for-analysis-shukla/
https://ebookmass.com/product/operator-analysis-hilbert-space-
methods-in-complex-analysis-jim-agler/
https://ebookmass.com/product/visual-complex-analysis-25th-
anniversary-edition-tristan-needham-2/
Visual Complex Analysis: 25th Anniversary Edition
Tristan Needham
https://ebookmass.com/product/visual-complex-analysis-25th-
anniversary-edition-tristan-needham/
https://ebookmass.com/product/genetic-analysis-of-complex-
disease-3rd-edition-william-k-scott/
https://ebookmass.com/product/complex-function-theory-takeo-
fujiwara/
https://ebookmass.com/product/feng-fu-design-and-analysis-of-
tall-and-complex-structures-elsevier-2018-desconocido/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-structure-of-complex-words-
empson/
Integration with Complex Numbers
Integration
with Complex
Numbers
A primer on complex analysis
Aisling McCluskey
Personal Professor in Mathematics
National University of Ireland Galway
Brian McMaster
Honorary Senior Lecturer
Queen’s University Belfast
3
3
Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP,
United Kingdom
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship,
and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of
Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries
© Brian McMaster and Aisling McCluskey 2022
The moral rights of the authors have been asserted
Impression: 1
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in
a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the
prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted
by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics
rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the
above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the
address above
You must not circulate this work in any other form
and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer
Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press
198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Data available
Library of Congress Control Number: 2021949554
ISBN 978–0–19–284607–5 (hbk)
ISBN 978–0–19–284643–3 (pbk.)
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780192846075.001.0001
Printed and bound by
CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY
Cover image: Fedor Selivanov/Shutterstock.com
Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and
for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials
contained in any third party website referenced in this work.
We dedicate this book to our families
with love and gratitude
and in calm acceptance of the fact that they are
never going to read more than a page or two of it.
AMcC, BMcM, October 2019
Preface
Complex analysis, more than almost any other undergraduate topic in mathemat-
ics, runs the full pure/applied gamut from the most subtle, difficult and ingenious
proofs to the most direct, hands-on, engineering-based applications. This creates
challenges for the instructor as much as for the very wide range of students whose
various programmes require a secure grasp of some of its aspects. Its techniques
are indispensable to many, but skill in the use of a mathematical tool is hazardous
and fallible without a sound understanding of why and when that tool is the right
one to pick up: this kind of understanding develops only by combining careful
exploration of ideas, analysis of proofs and practice across a range of exercises.
Part of the challenge and the joy of teaching complex analysis is that there is
no ‘typical profile’ for its customer base. Students from practically oriented disci-
plines in the physical sciences need to be able to evaluate complicated real integrals
efficiently and accurately and, in many cases, complex analysis provides the most
suitable techniques for enabling this; however, those techniques need to be under-
stood in sufficient depth that their application shall be secure and dependable. Stu-
dents whose primary interests lie within mathematics itself require experience in
developing coherent logical arguments and then communicating them in insight-
ful and convincing language. Between these two (relative) extremes lie various
smaller sub-cohorts. Indeed, virtually everyone who is enrolled on a degree path-
way within physical, engineering or mathematical sciences will encounter, during
their first and second years of undergraduate study, some of the key features of
complex analysis. Those whose degrees are explicitly in mathematics are likely to
need many of them.
The common factors in the requirements of these diverse groups include clarity
of exposition, an empathetic understanding of the difficulties that learners are
likely to meet, an ample range of examples with and without specimen solutions,
and a consistent determination to allow enough time for fundamental ideas to
bed down into a secure foundation for confident progression. Our text offers a
reader-friendly contemporary balance between idea, proof and practice, informed
by several decades of classroom experience and a seasoned understanding of
the backgrounds, motivation and competing time pressures of today’s student
cohorts. To achieve its aim of supporting and sustaining such cohorts through
those aspects of complex analysis that they encounter in first- and second-year
study, it also balances the competing needs to be self-contained, comprehensive,
accessible and engaging—all in sufficient but not in excessive measures. In partic-
ular, it begins where most students are likely to be, and invests the time and effort
that are required in order to deliver accessibility and introductory gradualness.
The principles which have guided us in constructing this text—as also in our
other OUP books—are:
viii PREFACE
This book is designed as a primer in complex analysis. It sets out to engage stu-
dents who have no previous exposure to complex numbers and to bring them up
to a good standard of confident proficiency in one major application area: that
of evaluating challenging real definite integrals by associating them with complex
contour integrals for which routine algorithms are available. This is a technique
that we have found consistently to excite and satisfy quite diverse cohorts, and
which delivers insight into the power, the applicability and something of the unex-
pected beauty and elegance of the subject. In addition, the careful construction and
exploration of the background concepts that are needed to explain and justify this
process, together with an extensive spectrum of examples and exercises aimed at
developing competence and skill in their use, give the reader a broad grounding
in most of the elementary aspects of complex analysis. Depending on how rapid-
ly your classes are able to proceed, and how much background they have already
acquired in cognate areas, there is—in our experience—enough material here for
two first-year undergraduate semesters, or for one second-year semester.
Most of the exercises and examples that are embedded in the text come with
specimen solutions complete or outlined or hinted at. Those that are gathered
together at the end of most chapters constitute a suite of around 120 problems that
will assist you in creating assessments for your student groups: specimen solutions
for these are available to you upon application to the publishers, but not directly
to your students: please see the webpage www.oup.co.uk/companion/McCluskey
for how to gain access to them.
Prior knowledge that your students should ideally have before undertaking
study of this material includes elementary manipulative algebra up to the bino-
mial theorem and partial fractions, a clear intuitive understanding of the real
number system, the use of simple inequalities including modulus, set theory as a
language and proof techniques such as proof by induction and by contradiction,
familiarity with elementary calculus (especially differentiation and integration),
and basic real analysis such as convergence of sequences and series. However, we
devote Chapters 1, 3 and 5 to reviewing and revising the main topics in this list so
it is fully practicable to use the book for less extensively prepared cohorts. Here we
also introduce and develop, so far as is needed, two topics that are often missing
from students’ backgrounds—partial differentiation and improper integrals.
A note to the student reader
Whatever your reasons may be for wanting or needing to study integration involv-
ing complex numbers, it is likely that your intended goals include the following:
This book is designed to help you achieve this and more. In particular, it allows
time to explore and develop the initial ideas that need to be securely grasped before
embarking on more challenging issues, it incorporates informal discursive sections
to build up your intuitive feel for concepts that will guide and inform you in work-
ing with their proper mathematical formulations, and it steps aside from time to
time into roughwork paragraphs that provide a kind of apprenticeship experience
through which you can look ‘over the shoulder’ of a more experienced practitioner
and ‘under the bonnet’ of a complicated problem.
It will help you to get quickly into the interesting parts of this subject if you have
already acquired basic knowledge and technique in ‘real’ calculus and analysis,
especially concerning the ideas of sets, sequences and series and of the differentia-
tion and integration of real functions. However, we revise these topics in Chapters
1, 3 and 5, together with accounts of two matters that are sometimes missing
from the background of intending readers—partial differentiation and improp-
er integrals. Chapter 2 offers an introduction to complex numbers from the very
beginning, and Chapter 4 initiates the development of calculus in the complex set-
ting. If you happen to be thoroughly familiar with these matters already then you
can start the true business of the book from Chapter 6.
Our emphatic advice to you is to try every exercise or example as you meet it,
and then either to check your answer with a model solution if the book or your
lecture course makes one available or to see if your account convinces a tutor or a
fellow student. There are over 120 exercises compiled at the ends of our chapters,
and a comparable number of examples—mostly with full solutions—embedded
in the text itself. Try them all! Mathematics is not a subject that you can learn by
passively reading: it is a practical, performance-based discipline whose skills can
only be acquired and sharpened by doing. The more mathematics you do—even do
wrongly, provided that you find out the weak points in your work and strengthen
them for the next occasion—the deeper your understanding and your skill base
will become, and the greater the enjoyment you will derive from doing more.
Contents
1 Background part A 1
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 Revision 1: sets 2
1.3 Revision 2: sequences 4
1.4 Revision 3: series 6
3 Background part B 41
3.1 Real functions 41
3.2 Limits of real functions 44
3.3 Continuity of real functions 49
3.4 Differentiation of real functions 52
3.5 A very brief look at partial differentiation 57
3.6 Exercises 61
4 Complex functions 63
4.1 Introduction 63
4.2 Limits, continuity, differentiation (again) 64
4.3 Cauchy–Riemann 73
4.4 Surprises! 78
4.5 Exercises 81
5 Background part C 85
5.1 Introduction 85
5.2 Integration by inspection 87
5.3 Integration by parts 88
5.4 Integration by substitution, or change of variable 90
5.5 A look at improper integrals 92
5.6 Cauchy principal values—a (slightly) more advanced topic 96
5.7 Exercises 105
9 Residues 179
9.1 Laurent’s theorem 179
9.2 The residue theorem 190
9.3 Residue calculation tools 193
9.4 Exercises 195
1 Background part A
set, sequence, series
.................................................................................
1.1 Introduction
Anyone who wishes to work with aspects of calculus or analysis—limits, continu-
ity, series, differentiation, integration—in the context of complex numbers will be
well advised to have first studied the corresponding ideas in the context of real
numbers. This is because most of us feel the real number system to be much closer
to everyday experience than its complex cousin, therefore leaving us freer to focus
on acquiring skill in and familiarity with these rather challenging notions without
needing to worry about the nature, or even the existence, of the numbers under-
lying what we are doing. All the same, it is important to realise that only quite a
limited grasp of real calculus/analysis is necessary before beginning to diversify
into studying its complex clone: for the basic ideas that we need in the two areas
are virtually identical, and the same can be said about many of the results that are
built upon them.
What we seek to do in Chapters 1, 3 and 5 of the present text is to summarise
as succinctly as possible the pieces of real calculus and real analysis that we should
like the reader to have met before starting to work on the main material. These
background chapters do not set out to be anything like complete accounts of the
topics that headline them, and their intended purpose varies from one learner to
another. Depending on the experience, the time constraints and the motivation of
individual readers, they are designed
1. either briefly to remind the reader who has already achieved a good grasp of
basic real analysis about the particular concepts, results and notations that we
shall directly use in later chapters,
2. or to encourage the less-well-versed reader to try to make the time to acquire
an understanding and a modest degree of skill in the concepts, results and nota-
tions listed (possibly by referring to one of the texts named under ‘Suggestions
for Further Reading’),
3. or, at absolute minimum, to list—as clearly as time and space permit us—the
ideas of real analysis upon which this account of the development of complex
analysis is going to be built.
Integration with Complex Numbers. McCluskey and McMaster, Oxford University Press.
© Brian McMaster and Aisling McCluskey (2022). DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780192846075.003.0001
2 1 BACKGROUND PART A
x ∈ ℂ, x ∉ ℝ
is simply a quick way to write that x is a complex number but that it is not a real
number.
Finite sets can be simply and conveniently represented by enclosing a list
of their elements within curly brackets; for instance, {2, 5, 7, 11} is the set of
prime divisors of 3080. Similar notations can with caution be employed for some
infinite sets; no confusion is likely to arise if we write {1, 2, 3, 4, . . .} for ℕ or
{. . . − 2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3, . . .} for ℤ. On the other hand, more seriously infinite sets
such as ℝ cannot be written in this way.
1.2.2 Definitions If A and B are sets such that every element of A is also an
element of B then we call A a subset of B and write A ⊆ B (or, equivalently, B ⊇ A).
We note the extreme cases: A ⊆ A is always true, and so is ∅ ⊆ A where ∅ denotes
the ‘empty set’, that is, the set that has no elements at all. If P(x) is any meaningful
statement about the typical element x of a set A, then the symbols
all denote the subset of A that comprises exactly those elements x of A for which
P(x) is a true statement. For instance, {x ∈ ℝ : x ∉ ℤ} is the set of all real numbers
1.2 REVISION 1: SETS 3
that are not integers, {x ∈ ℝ : −1 < x < 2} is the ‘open interval’ of all real
numbers that lie strictly between −1 and 2, often written more briefly as (−1, 2),
and {z ∈ ℂ | z8 = 1} consists of all the complex eighth roots of unity (another
matter to be discussed later). Of course, {x ∈ A : x ̸= x} is just ∅.
1.2.3 Definitions For any sets A and B we define their union A ∪ B, their inter-
section A ∩ B and their set difference A \ B as follows:
A ∪ B = {x : x ∈ A or x ∈ B (or both)},
A ∩ B = {x : x ∈ A and x ∈ B},
A \ B = {x : x ∈ A but x ∉ B}.
In the case where B ⊆ A, the set difference A \ B is usually called the relative
complement of B in A or, more briefly, the complement of B if the context makes it
obvious which background set A is being considered.
The ideas of union and intersection extend routinely to deal with more than two
sets—indeed, we can define the union of any family of sets (even an infinite family)
to comprise all the objects that are elements of at least one set in the family, and
the intersection of any family of sets to comprise all objects that belong to every
set in the family.
There are a large number of ‘rules’ that facilitate combining sets via unions,
intersections and complements in an almost mechanical way, but we are unlikely
to need them very much (and will draw attention on an ad hoc basis to any that do
turn out to be useful to us).
8. (−∞, b] = {x ∈ ℝ : x ≤ b}
9. (−∞, ∞) = ℝ
10. [a, a] = {x ∈ ℝ : a ≤ x ≤ a} = {a}
Intervals such as 1, 2, 3 and 4 (and, technically, 10) are the bounded intervals,
whereas the others are unbounded. Numbers 1, 5, 7 and 9 are open intervals and
numbers 2, 6, 8, 9 (and, technically, 10) are closed intervals. Note that item 10 is
often considered not to be an interval at all, whereas some texts classify it as a
degenerate interval.
(a1 , a2 , a3 , a4 , . . .)
and
(an )n ∈ ℕ
and even just
(an ).
In order fully to describe a particular sequence, we need to include instructions
on how to determine the typical term1 an , and that usually entails either an
explicit formula for an or a recursive procedure for creating it from earlier
terms in the sequence. A classic example of the latter is the Fibonacci sequence
(1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, . . .) in which the recursive pattern is that an+2 = an+1 + an
(that is, each term from the third one onwards is defined by adding the two that
immediately precede it); an explicit formula for the nth Fibonacci number as a
function of n can be found, but it is far from obvious at first sight.
Some sequences, but by no means all of them, settle towards an ‘equilibrium
state’ or ‘limiting value’ as we scan further and further along the list of their terms.
1 Unless, of course, the pattern of the first few terms is so obvious that nothing further is required:
for instance, in the case of the sequence
( )
1 1 1 1
1, , , , , . . .
2 4 8 16
1
it is surely unnecessary to say explicitly that the nth term is .
2n−1
1.3 REVISION 2: SEQUENCES 5
When this does occur, it is the most important thing to know about that particular
sequence. Here follows the precise definition: recall that the modulus |x| of a real
number x is the physical size of x, disregarding whether it is positive or negative,
that is,
(
x if x ≥ 0,
|x| =
−x if x < 0.
n ≥ nε ⇒ |an − L| < ε.
no matter how small the tolerance ε has been set, we can make an a good
approximation to L, that is, one whose error or inaccuracy |an − L| is smaller
than that allowed tolerance ε, just by going far enough along the sequence,
that is, by making sure that the label n on the term an is at least some threshold
value nε (which, of course, probably depends on how small the tolerance ε is
required to be).
looks like nothing more than common sense. Likewise, the limits of differences,
products, quotients and so on of convergent sequences turn out to be exactly what
common sense expects them to be (provided always that no attempt is made to
divide by zero, of course).
6 1 BACKGROUND PART A
(an ) = (a1 , a2 , a3 , a4 , . . .)
is any sequence that is formed by selecting an unending list of some of its elements
in their original order
(where n1 < n2 < n3 < n4 < . . . to ensure that the order of the selected terms is
as it was in the parent sequence). The (admittedly rather cumbersome) standard
notation for such a subsequence is
(ank )k∈ℕ .
1.3.4 Theorem
• Every convergent sequence is bounded (that is, we can find some positive con-
stant K so that every term of the sequence lies between K and −K).
• If a sequence converges to a certain limit, then every one of its subsequences also
converges (and to that same limit).
• Every bounded real sequence possesses a convergent subsequence. (Note that
this result is known as the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem.)
(Incidentally, the first and second parts of this portmanteau theorem give us the
two standard ways of trying to show that a given sequence is divergent: we should
either try to prove that it is not bounded, or else seek two subsequences of it that
possess different limits. If we succeed in either of those enterprises, the sequence
cannot have been convergent.)
1.4.1 Definition For any given real sequence (ak )k∈ℕ let (sn )n∈ℕ be the other
sequence defined by s1 = a1 , s2 = a1 + a2 , s3 = a1 + a2 + a3 and, in general,
X
n
sn = ak = a1 + a2 + a3 + . . . + an .
k=1
P∞
The series 1 ak is the pair of sequences (ak ) and (sn ). It is said to be a convergent
series if (sn ) is convergent (and then the limit of (sn ) is called the sum or, more
formally, the sum to infinity of the series); if (sn ) has no limit, the series is said to
be divergent. The two constituent sequences (ak ) and (sn ) are called the sequence
of terms and the sequence of partial sums of the series.
Common experience is that
I take the liberty of asking through you that something be done for a young lad
named Orion P. Howe, of Waukegan, Illinois, who belongs to the 55th Illinois, but
is at present from home, wounded. I think he is too young for West Point, but
would be the very thing for a midshipman.
When the assault at Vicksburg was at its height, on the 19th of May, and I was
in front near the road which formed my line of attack, this young man came up to
me wounded and bleeding, with a good, healthy boy’s cry: “General Sherman,
send some cartridges to Colonel Malmborg, the men are all out.” “What is the
matter, my boy?” “They shot me in the leg, sir, but I can go to the hospital. Send
the cartridges right away.” Even where we stood the shot fell thick, and I told him
to go to the rear at once, I would attend to the cartridges, and off he limped. Just
before he disappeared on the hill, he turned and called to me as loud as he could:
“Calibre 54.”
I have not seen the boy since, and his colonel gave me his address as above, and
says he is a bright, intelligent boy, with a fair preliminary education. What
arrested my attention there, was, and what renews my memory now, is, that one
so young, carrying a musket-ball wound through his leg, should have found his
way to me on that fatal spot, and delivered his message, not forgetting the very
important part even of the calibre of the musket, 54, which you know is an
unusual one. I’ll warrant the boy has in him the elements of a man, and I
commend him to the government as one worthy the fostering care of some of its
national institutions.
I am, with respect, your obedient servant,
W. T. Sherman,
Major-General Commanding.
BE PATRIOTIC.
It may be, my boy, that you will never be able to guide a regiment
of soldiers as did Nathan Beman, or carry cartridges as did young
Howe, but that is no reason why you should not be just as patriotic.
That boy who is law abiding, who opposes everything that tends to
undermine the national fabric, who decries Sabbath desecration, vile
language, bad literature, and all vices, is a patriot in the true sense of
the word, and can be relied upon in times of peace as well as war to
do his best for the country.
Be patriotic. Cultivate the spirit of admiration toward the national
flag. Dowered with priceless traditions its stars and stripes speak of
the sufferings of the past, the prosperity of the present, and the
glories of the future which shall attend the onward march of this
great Republic. It is the hallowed emblem of the world’s greatest
nation, and of its most resplendent civilization. Of Sherman it was
said that he never failed to salute the flag by taking off his hat in its
presence. That flag is the emblem of all we are and all we expect to
be.
“It floats that all the rights of men may every people bless
And God’s own kingdom walk the world in peace and righteousness.”
By Samuel Fallows
“Early let me seek Thy favor;
Early let me do Thy will;
Blessed Lord, and only Savior,
With Thy love my bosom fill;
Blessed Jesus,
Thou hast loved me, love me still.”
Having fairly embarked on the voyage which ceases not till the port
of eternity is reached, it is an exhibition of good seamanship to take
one’s bearings. By the log is estimated the progress of the vessel; by
the compass, the direction the ship is pursuing, and by the altitude of
the stars the latitude in which it is. In like manner the Moral
chapters indicate the progress boys should make; the Social, the
course they should take, and the Religious, the latitude in which they
should live. Of these the religious are the most essential, for a boy
cannot be truly religious without being moral and social.
When the Rebellion began a young man went to his mother and
said: “Mother, may I volunteer? I argue the matter in four plain
ways. First, my country needs me. Second, she calls me. Third, I am
able to go. Fourth, I am willing. This makes the duty very clear to me,
unless you interpose a veto, and I think you are too good a patriot to
do that.” She gave her consent, and before he departed, she said:
“You know, my son, how much I have wished to see you a Christian.
Now I want you to look at the claims of Jesus exactly as you have
looked at those of your country, simply and honestly, and see if those
same four plain propositions will not lead you into the service of
heaven.” “I’ll think of it, mother,” was his answer, and they parted.
He did not forget his promise. On his first Sabbath in camp he
resolutely set himself to the fulfilment of his mother’s request.
Remembering how he had argued duty to his country, he brought
before his mind in the same manner the subject of the divine claims
upon his heart and life. “Does Jesus want me? Does He call me? Am I
able to serve Him? Am I willing?” With an open Bible, the first three
questions were quickly answered. At the last one he hesitated, but
duty seemed so clear that he dared not falter, and falling on his knees
he gave himself to Christ. The next letter home announced him to be
a Christian soldier.
A CHRISTIAN.
Many names and titles are significant, but none means so much or
has so much honor attached to it as the word “Christian.” Young
said, “A Christian is the highest style of man.” A Christian is a Christ-
lover and a Christ-worshipper, because he sees God in Christ, and in
the God-man he sees the world’s Redeemer and his own personal
Saviour. He lives in the world, but is not of the world. While in the
world he blesses it by living a godly, upright life. His life work and
influence are a benediction to those among whom he moves. His
purpose is “not to make a living,” as Governor Russell, of
Massachusetts, used to say, “but to make a life.” He is far more
concerned about this than about dying. Death is the least of his
concerns. To live is Christ, and because of this, his life is proof of his
profession.
HOW TO BE A CHRISTIAN.
“REMEMBER.”
“Remember now thy Creator in the days of thy youth,” (Eccl. 12:1)
is the most important exhortation of the Old Testament. Remember
is just the opposite of forget, and the one to remember is the most
exalted and important in the universe, “thy Creator.” Remember His
Word and believe it, for the promise is: “He that heareth My Word
and believeth on Him that sent Me, hath everlasting life.” (John
5:24). Remember His work and accept it, for He was made to “sin for
us, Who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of
God in Him.” (2 Cor. 5:21). Remember His love and return it, for
“herein is love, not that we loved God, but that He loved us,” (1 John
4:10) and “gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in
Him should not perish but have everlasting life.” (John 3:16).
Remember this Creator now. Only one time is mentioned in the
Scriptures at which eternal life is promised. Cowley sang of an
“everlasting now,” but there is no such time, and no wise boy desires
that there shall be. There is an eternity of the past, an eternity of the
future, but “now” is limited to now. “Behold, now is the accepted
time; behold, now is the day of salvation.” (2 Cor. 6:2). And this—
“Opportunity lost, however deplored
Is eternity gone and is never restored.”
By A. C. Lorimer, D. D.
When I was a youth, I loved to climb Arthur’s Seat early in the
morning, for the purpose of breathing the air borne to our inland
home from out the mighty seas; and so it is well for every lad each
day to seek the summit of highest faith, that he may hold
communion with God; that he may inhale something of the
atmosphere of eternal worlds.
It is said that Daniel opened his window when he prayed, toward
Jerusalem. It was doubtless that he might think of the hallowed city.
Better far, however, to open the windows of the soul toward heaven,
not merely that we may think of the hereafter, but that the invisible,
at the present moment, may stream into our being.
Prayer is the soul’s voice. It is the aspiration of the highest part of
man. It is the sublime confidence, that, though foreign, still it is
within the range of possibility to hold communion with the Creator
of us all. Every time we bend the knee before the Throne of Grace, we
declare our belief in our own God-likeness and in our indestructible
affinity for the divine. Therefore, pray, my boy, and keep on praying;
for it is the true Jacob’s ladder that will lead you, round by round, up
to the Everlasting Throne.
CHAPTER XXII
Be Prayerful
During the Civil War a dozen soldiers were playing cards one night
when one exclaimed: “What on earth was that?” Listening attentively
a moment, he heard a low, solemn voice, coming from the next tent,
occupied by several recruits, who had that day arrived in camp.
Accompanied by the others he approached the tent on tip-toe. “Boys,
he’s praying, or I’m a sinner!” he roared out. “Three cheers for the
parson!” shouted another man of the group as the prayer ended.
“You watch things for three weeks. I’ll show you how to take the
religion out of him,” said the first speaker, laughing. He was a large
burly fellow, prominent in mischief. The recruit was a slight, pale-
faced boy. During the next three weeks the latter was the butt of the
camp. Then several of the boys, conquered by the lad’s gentle
patience and uniform kindness, begged the others to stop annoying
him. “Oh, the little ranter is no better than the rest of us!” answered
the ringleader. “When we get under fire, you’ll see him run. These
pious folk don’t like the smell of gunpowder. I’ve no faith in their
religion.”
In a few weeks, the regiment broke camp, marched toward
Richmond, entered the Wilderness and engaged in that fearful battle.
The company to which the young recruit belonged had a desperate
struggle. The brigade was driven back, and when the line was formed
behind the breastworks they had built in the morning, he was
missing. When last seen, he was surrounded by enemies, fighting
desperately. At his side was the brave fellow who had made the poor
lad a constant object of ridicule. Both were given up as lost. Suddenly
the big man was seen tramping through the underbrush, bearing the
dead body of the boy. Reverently he laid the corpse down, saying as
he wiped the blood from his own face: “Boys, I couldn’t leave him
behind, he fought so. I thought he deserved a decent burial.”
During a lull in the battle the men dug a shallow grave and
tenderly laid him to rest. Then, as one was cutting the name and
regiment upon a board, the big man said, with a husky voice, “I guess
you’d better put the words ‘Praying soldier’ in somewhere. He
deserves the title, and maybe it’ll console him for our abuse.”
There was not a dry eye among those rough men as they stuck the
rudely carved board at the head of the grave. “Well,” said one, “he
was a praying Christian soldier if ever there was one! And,” turning
to the ringleader, “he didn’t run, did he, when he smelt gunpowder?”
“Run!” answered the big man, his voice tender with emotion. “Why,
he didn’t budge an inch! But what’s that to standing for weeks our
fire like a man, and never sending a word back! He just stood by his
flag and let us pepper him, he did; and boys, I have made up my
mind if prayer will make a man as bold, as loving, as forgiving, as
good, as it did that boy, I’m going to resort to it. It did him good and
it’ll do me good,” and as the other fellows bent their heads he prayed
for forgiveness and salvation, at the close of which the others said,
“Amen!”
HOW TO PRAY.
Prayer is a blessed privilege, a vital necessity, an imperative duty,
but many there are who do not know how to pray. A mere repetition
of words or reading prayers is not prayer. Prayer may be a sigh, a
tear, a groan, a bungling utterance, “a true wish” as Phillips Brooks
used to say, “sent God-ward.” It is—
“the soul’s sincere desire
Uttered or unexpressed.
The motive of a hidden fire
That kindles in the breast.”