Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 42

Solution Manual for Managerial

Economics 8th Edition Samuelson


Marks 1118808940 9781118808948
Go to download the full and correct content document:
https://testbankpack.com/download/solution-manual-for-managerial-economics-8th-e
dition-samuelson-marks-1118808940-9781118808948/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...

Test Bank for Managerial Economics 8th Edition


Samuelson Marks 1118808940 9781118808948

https://testbankpack.com/download/test-bank-for-managerial-
economics-8th-edition-samuelson-marks-1118808940-9781118808948/

Solution Manual for Managerial Economics and Business


Strategy 8th Edition Baye Prince 0073523224
9780073523224

https://testbankpack.com/download/solution-manual-for-managerial-
economics-and-business-strategy-8th-edition-
baye-0073523224-9780073523224/

Test Bank for Managerial Economics and Business


Strategy 8th Edition Baye Prince 0073523224
9780073523224

https://testbankpack.com/download/test-bank-for-managerial-
economics-and-business-strategy-8th-edition-
baye-0073523224-9780073523224/

Solution Manual for Managerial Economics 4th Edition


Froeb McCann Ward Shor 1305259335 9781305259331

https://testbankpack.com/download/solution-manual-for-managerial-
economics-4th-edition-froeb-mccann-ward-
shor-1305259335-9781305259331/
Solution Manual for Managerial Economics and Strategy
2nd Edition Perloff Brander 0134167872 9780134167879

https://testbankpack.com/download/solution-manual-for-managerial-
economics-and-strategy-2nd-edition-perloff-
brander-0134167872-9780134167879/

Solution Manual for Managerial Economics and Business


Strategy 9th Edition Baye Prince1259290611
9781259290619

https://testbankpack.com/download/solution-manual-for-managerial-
economics-and-business-strategy-9th-edition-
baye-1259290611-9781259290619/

Solution Manual for Managerial Economics 3rd Edition


Froeb McCann Ward Shor 1133951481 9781133951483

https://testbankpack.com/download/solution-manual-for-managerial-
economics-3rd-edition-froeb-mccann-ward-
shor-1133951481-9781133951483/

Solution Manual for Entrepreneurial Finance 6th edition


by Adelman Marks ISBN 0133140512 9780133140514

https://testbankpack.com/download/solution-manual-for-
entrepreneurial-finance-6th-edition-by-adelman-marks-
isbn-0133140512-9780133140514/

Solution Manual for Introduction to Chemistry 3rd


Edition Bauer Birk Marks 0073402672 9780073402673

https://testbankpack.com/download/solution-manual-for-
introduction-to-chemistry-3rd-edition-bauer-birk-
marks-0073402672-9780073402673/
Solution Manual for Managerial Economics 8th
Edition Samuelson Marks 1118808940
9781118808948
Test Bank: https://testbankpack.com/p/test-bank-for-managerial-
economics-8th-edition-samuelson-marks-1118808940-
9781118808948/

Solution Manual: https://testbankpack.com/p/solution-manual-for-


managerial-economics-8th-edition-samuelson-marks-1118808940-
9781118808948/
CHAPTER TWO

OPTIMAL DECISIONS USING


MARGINAL ANALYSIS

OBJECTIVES

1. To introduce the basic economic model of the firm (A Simple Model of


the Firm)
- The main focus is on determining the firm’s profit-maximizing level
of output.
- The main assumption is that there is a single product (or multiple,
independent products) with deterministic demand and cost.

2. To depict the behavior of price, revenue, cost, and profit as output


varies. (A Microchip Manufacturer)

3. To explain the notion of marginal profit (including its relationship to


calculus) and show that maximum profit occurs at an output such that
marginal profit equal zero. (Marginal Analysis)

John Wiley & Sons


2-1
4. To reinterpret the optimality condition in terms of the basic
components, marginal revenue and marginal cost. (Marginal Revenue
and Marginal Cost)

5. To illustrate the uses of sensitivity analysis. (Sensitivity Analysis)

TEACHING SUGGESTIONS

I. Introduction and Motivation

John Wiley & Sons


2-2
A. This is a “nuts and bolts” chapter. Because it appears up front in the
text, it’s important to explain the motivation and assumptions. It is a
good idea to remind students of the following points.

John Wiley & Sons


2-3
1) The model of the firm is deliberately simplified so that its logic is laid
bare. Many additional complications will be supplied in later chapters.
The key simplifications for now are:

• The model is of a generic firm. Although microchips are chosen to


make the discussion concrete, there is no description of the kind of
market or the nature of competition within it. The description and
analysis of different market structures comes in Chapters 7 through 10.

• Profit is the sole goal of the firm; price and output are the sole decision
variables.

• The description of demand and cost is as “bare bones” as it gets. The


demand curve and cost function are taken as given. (How the firm
might estimate these are studied in Chapters 3 through 6.)

B. In general, our policy is to use extended decision examples, different


than the ones in the text, to illustrate the most important concepts. (Going
over the same examples pushes the boredom envelope.) In the present
chapter, we make an exception to this rule. It is important to make sure
that students with different economic and quantitative backgrounds
all get off roughly on the same foot. Reviewing a familiar example
(microchips) makes this much easier.

II. Teaching the “Nuts and Bolts”

A. Graphic Overview. The text presents the revenue, cost, and profit
functions in three equivalent forms: in tables, in graphs, and in equations.
In our view, the best way to convey the logic of the relationships is via
graphs. (The student who craves actual numbers can get plenty of
them in the text tables.) Here is one strategy for teaching the nuts and
bolts:

John Wiley & Sons


2-4
1. Using the microchip example, depict the demand curve, briefly note its
properties and demand equation (in both forms).

2. Next focus on revenue, noting the tradeoff between price and quantity.
Present and justify the revenue equation. Graph it and note its
properties.

3. Repeat the same process with the cost function (reminding students
about fixed versus variable cost). At this point, your blackboard graph
should be a copy of Figure 2.8. Steps 1-3 should take no more than 20
minutes.

4. Since the gap between the revenue and cost curves measures profit, one
could find the optimal output by carefully measuring the maximum gap
(perhaps using calipers). Emphasize that marginal analysis provides a
much easier and more insightful approach. Point out the economic
meaning of marginal cost and marginal revenue. Note that they are the
slopes of the respective curves.

5. Next argue that the profit gap increases (with additional output) when
MR > MC but narrows when MR < MC. (On the graph, select
quantities that are too great or too small to make the point.) Identify
Q* where the tangent to the revenue curve is parallel to the slope of the
cost function. In short, optimal output occurs where MR = MC.

B. Other Topics. The approach in part A provides a simple way of


conveying the basic logic of marginal analysis using the components of
MR and MC. Once this ground is covered, the instructor should
emphasize other basic points:
1. The equivalence between Mπ = 0 and MR = MC.
2. Calculus derivations of Mπ, MR, and MC.
3. The exact numerical solution for the microchip example.
4. The graphs of MR and MC and an exploration of comparative statics
effects (shifts in the curves) and the effects on Q*.

John Wiley & Sons


2-5
C. Applications. Besides the applications in the text, the following
problems are recommended: Problem 1 (a quick but important check),
Problems 6, 7 and 9 (numerical applications), Problem 11 (the general
solution), and Problem 12. (If the class has a good grasp of this last
problem, nothing else will seem difficult.)

Here is a stylized example that nicely illustrates marginal analysis.

1. SITING A SHOPPING MALL

A real-estate developer is planning the construction of a large


shopping mall in a coastal county. The question is where to locate it.
To help her in the decision, the developer has gathered a wealth of
information, including the stylized “map” of the region in the
accompanying figure. The county’s population centers run from west
to east along the coast (these are labeled A to H), with the ocean to
the north. Since available land and permits are not a problem, the
developer judges that she can locate the mall anywhere along the
coast, that is, anywhere along line segment AH. In fact, the mall
would be welcome in any of the towns due to its potential positive
impact on the local economy.
According to an old adage, “The three most important factors in the
real-estate business are location, location, and location.” Accordingly,
the developer seeks a site that is proximate to as many potential
customers as possible. A natural measure of locational convenience is
the total travel miles (TTM) between the mall and its customer
population. Thus, Figure 2.1 notes the distances between towns in the
county. It also shows the potential number of customers per week in
each town. The developer’s key question is: Where along the coast
should the mall be located to minimize the total travel miles?

John Wiley & Sons


2-6
Figure 1 Locating a Shopping Mall
Number of Customers per week (thousands)
15 10 10 10 5 20 10 15
West East
A| B C D E F G H
3.0 3.5 2.0 2.5 4.5 2.0 4.5
Distance between Towns (miles)

Answer
We could try to find the best location by brute force – by selecting
alternative sites and computing the TTM for each one. For example, the
TTM at the possible site labeled X (1 mile west of town C) is

(5.5)(15) + (2.5)(10) + (1.0)(10) + (3.0)(10)


+ (5.5)(5) + (10.0)(20) + (12.0)(10) + (16.5)(15) = 742.5.

The TTM is found by multiplying the distance to the mall by the


number of trips for each town (beginning with A and ending with H)
and summing. However, the method requires a good deal of
computational effort while offering no guarantee that an optimal
location (i.e., one that has the lowest TTM of all possible candidates)
will be found. The method only claims that its choice is the best of
the limited number of candidates for which TTMs have been computed.
It is far easier to determine the mall’s optimal location using
marginal analysis. Hint: Begin with an arbitrary location, say, point
X. (Do not compute its TTM.) Instead, consider a small move to a
nearby site, such as town C. Then compute the change in the TTM of
such a move.
Marginal analysis identifies the optimal location as town E. The
demonstration involves a number of steps following a very simple

John Wiley & Sons


2-7
logic. First consider the move from location X to Town C. Making
this move, we see that TTM must decline. The eastward move means
a 1-mile reduction in travel distance for all customers at C or farther
east (70,000 trip-miles in all). Therefore, the TTM is reduced by this
amount. Of course, travel distances have increased for travelers at or
to the west of X. For these customers, the TTM increase is 25,000
trip-miles. Therefore, the net overall change in TTM is -70,000 +
25,000 = -45,000 trip-miles. Total TTM has declined because the site
moved toward a greater number of travelers than it moved away from.
Town C, therefore, is a better location than site X.
Because the original move was beneficial, we try moving farther
east, say, to town D. Again, the move reduces the TTM. (Check this.)
What about a move east again to town E? This brings a further
reduction. What about a move to town F? Now we find that the TTM
has increased. (By how much?) Moreover, any further moves east
would continue to increase the TTM. Thus, town E is the best site.
The subtlety of the method lies in its focus on changes. One need
never actually calculate a TTM (or even know the distances between
towns) to prove that town E is the optimal location. (We can check
that town E’s TTM is 635.) One requires only some simple reasoning
about the effects of changes.

Here is a second application.

2. a. For five years, an oil drilling company has profitably operated in the
state of Alaska (the only place it operates). Last year, the state
legislature instituted a flat annual tax of $100,000 on any company
extracting oil (or natural gas) in Alaska. How would this tax affect the
amount of oil the company extracts? Explain.

b. Suppose instead that the state imposes a well-head tax, let’s say a tax of
$10.00 on each barrel of oil extracted. Answer the questions of part a.

John Wiley & Sons


2-8
c. Finally, suppose that the state levies a proportional income tax (say
10% of net income). Answer the questions of part a. What would be
the effect of a progressive tax?

d. Now suppose that the company has a limited number of drilling rigs
extracting oil at Alaskan sites and at other sites in the United States.
What would be the effect on the company’s oil output in Alaska if the
state levied a proportional income tax as in part c?

Answer
a. This tax acts as a fixed cost. As long as it remains profitable to produce
in Alaska, the tax has no effect on the firm’s optimal output.

b. The well-head tax increases the marginal cost of extraction by $10.00


per barrel. The upward shift in MC means the new intersection of MR
and MC occurs at a lower optimal level of output.

c. The income tax (either proportional or progressive) has no effect on the


company’s optimal output. For instance, suppose that the company’s
after-tax income is:  = .9(R-C) under a 10% proportional tax. To
maximize its after-tax income, the best the company can do is to continue
to maximize its before-tax income. Another way of seeing this is to note
that the tax causes a 10% downward shift in the firm’s MR and MC
curves. With the matching shift, the new intersection of MR and MC
is at the same optimal quantity as the old intersection.

d. When the firm operates in multiple states with limited drilling rigs,
using a rig in Alaska means less oil is pumped (and lower profit is earned)
somewhere else. There is an opportunity cost to Alaskan drilling. Thus,
one can argue that before the tax, the company should have allocated
rigs so as to equate marginal profits in the different states. With the
tax, the marginal profit in Alaska is reduced, prompting the possible
switch of rigs from Alaska to other (higher marginal profit) locations.

John Wiley & Sons


2-9
D. Mini-case: Apple Computer in the Mid-1990s
The mini-case reproduced on the next page provides a hands-on
application of profit maximization and marginal analysis.

Answer
a. Clearly, the period 1994-1995 was marked by a significant adverse
shift in demand against Apple due to major enhancements of
competing computers: lower prices, better interfaces (Windows), sales
to order (Dell), and more abundant software.
b. Setting MR = MC implies 4,500 - .3Q = 1,500, so Q* = 10,000 units
and P = $3,000. Given 1994’s state of demand, Apple’s 1994
production strategy was indeed optimal.
c. In 1995, demand and MR have declined significantly. Now, setting
MR = MC implies 3,900 - .3Q = 1,350, so Q* = 8,500 units and P =
$2,625. Apple should cut its price and its planned output.

John Wiley & Sons


2-10
Apple Computer in the Mid 90s

Between 1991 and 1994, Apple Computer engaged in a holding action in the desktop
market dominated by PCs using Intel chips and running Microsoft’s operating system.1
In 1994, Apple’s flagship model, the Power Mac, sold roughly 10,000 units per month at
an average price of $3,000 per unit. At the time, Apple claimed about a 9% market share
of the desktop market (down from greater than 15% in the 1980s).

By the end of 1995, Apple had witnessed a dramatic shift in the competitive environment.
In the preceding 18 months, Intel had cut the prices of its top-performing Pentium chip by
some 40%. Consequently, Apple’s two largest competitors, Compaq and IBM, reduced
average PC prices by 15%. Mail-order retailer Dell continued to gain market share via
aggressive pricing. At the same time, Microsoft introduced Windows 95, finally offering
the PC world the look and feel of the Mac interface. Many software developers began
producing applications only for the Windows operating system or delaying development
of Macintosh applications until months after Windows versions had been shipped.
Overall, fewer users were switching from PCs to Macs.

Apple’s top managers grappled with the appropriate pricing response to these competitive
events. Driven by the speedy new PowerPC chip, the Power Mac offered capabilities and
a user-interface that compared favorably to those of PCs. Analysts expected that Apple
could stay competitive by matching its rivals’ price cuts. However, John Sculley, Apple’s
CEO, was adamant about retaining a 50% gross profit margin and maintaining premium
prices. He was confident that Apple would remain strong in key market segments – the
home PC market, the education market, and desktop publishing.

Questions.

1. What effect (if any) did the events of 1995 have on the demand curve for Power Macs?
Should Apple preserve its profit margins or instead cut prices?

2. a) In 1994, the marginal cost of producing the Power Mac was about $1,500 per unit,
and a rough estimate of the monthly demand curve was: P = 4,500 - .15Q. At the time,
what was Apple’s optimal output and pricing policy?
b) By the end of 1995, some analysts estimated that the Power Mac’s user value (relative
to rival PCs) had fallen by as much as $600 per unit. What does this mean for Apple’s
new demand curve at end-of-year 1995? How much would sales fall if Apple held to its
1994 price? Assuming a marginal cost reduction to $1,350 per unit, what output and price
policy should Apple now adopt?

1This account is based on J. Carlton, “Apple’s Choice: Preserve Profits or Cut Prices,”
The Wall Street Journal, February 22, 1996, p. B1.

John Wiley & Sons


2-11
ADDITIONAL MATERIALS

I. Readings

A. Lowry, “Is Uber’s Surge-Pricing an Example of High-Tech Gouging?”


The New York Times Magazine, January 12, 2014, pp. 18-20.

J. Jargon and E. Glazer, “Crisis Quickens at Quiznos,” The Wall Street


Journal, December 7, 2013, p. B1.

J. Jargon, “Battle over Menu Prices Heats Up,” The Wall Street Journal,
August 23, 2013, p. B6.

R. H. Frank, “How can they Charge that? (and other questions),” The New
York Times, May 12, 2013, p. BU8.

A. Gasparro, “Amid Falling Profit, McDonald’s to Revisit ‘Dollar Menu’,”


The Wall Street Journal, October 20, 2012.

M. Kaminski, “An Airline that Makes Money, Really,” The Wall Street
Journal , February 4, 2012, p. A13.

M. Cieply, “For Movie Stars, the Big Money is now Deferred,” The New
York Times, March 4, 2010, p. A1.

N. S. Riley, “Other People’s Money,” The Wall Street Journal, October 3,


2008, p. W11.

R. Chittum, “Price Points,” The Wall Street Journal, October 30, 2006, p.
R7. (How providers of consumer services compare extra revenues and extra
costs.)

T. H. Davenport, “Competing on Analytics,” Harvard Business Review,


January 2006.

John Wiley & Sons


2-12
C. Oggier and E, Fragniere, and J. Stuby, “Nestle Improves its Financial
Reporting with Management Science,” Interfaces, July-August, 2005, pp.
271-280.

II. Case

Colgate-Palmolive Co.: The Precision Toothbrush (9-593-064), Harvard


Business School, 1993. Teaching Note (5-595-025). (Explores profit
analyses of alternative launch strategies.)

III. Quips and Quotes

Small mistakes are the stepping stones to large failures.

There was an old saying about our small town. Our town’s population
never changed. Every time a baby was born a man left town. (Does this say
something about the balance of marginal changes at an optimum?)

The head of a small commuter plane service reported that as costs rose, the
company’s breakeven point rose from 6 to 8 to 11 passengers. “I finally
figured we were in trouble since our planes only have 9 seats.”

If you laid all of the economists in the world end to end, they still wouldn’t
reach a conclusion. (George Bernard Shaw)

An economist is a person who is very good with numbers but who lacks the
personality to be an accountant.

The age of chivalry is gone; that of sophisters, economists, and calculators


has succeeded. (Edmund Burke)

Please find me a one-armed economist so we will not always hear, “On the
other hand . . .” (Herbert Hoover)

John Wiley & Sons


2-13
Answers to Back-of-the-Chapter Problems

1. This statement confuses the use of average values and marginal values.
The proper statement is that output should be expanded so long as
marginal revenue exceeds marginal cost. Clearly, average revenue is
not the same as marginal revenue, nor is average cost identical to
marginal cost. Indeed, if management followed the average-
revenue/average-cost rule, it would expand output to the point where
AR = AC, in which case it is making zero profit per unit and, therefore,
zero total profit!

2. The revenue function is R = 170Q - 20Q2. Maximizing revenue means


setting marginal revenue equal to zero. Marginal revenue is: MR =
dR/dQ = 170 - 40Q. Setting 170 - 40Q = 0 implies Q = 4.25 lots. By
contrast, profit is maximized by expanding output only to Q = 3.3 lots.
Although the firm can increase its revenue by expanding output from
3.3 to 4.5 lots, it sacrifices profit by doing so (since the extra revenue
gained falls short of the extra cost incurred.)

3. In planning for a smaller enrollment, the college would look to answer


many of the following questions: How large is the expected decline in
enrollment? (Can marketing measures be taken to counteract the drop?)
How does this decline translate into lower tuition revenue (and perhaps
lower alumni donations)? How should the university plan its down-
sizing? Via cuts in faculty and administration? Reduced spending on
buildings, labs, and books? Less scholarship aid? How great would be
the resulting cost savings? Can the university become smaller (as it must)
without compromising academic excellence?

4. a.  = PQ – C = (120 - .5Q)Q - (420 + 60Q + Q2) = -420 + 60Q -


1.5Q2. Therefore, M = d /dQ = 60 - 3Q = 0. Solving yields Q* = 20.

John Wiley & Sons


2-14
Alternatively, R = PQ = (120 - .5Q)Q = 120Q - .5Q2. Therefore, MR =
120 – Q. In turn, C = -420 + 60Q + Q2, implying: MC = 60 + 2Q.
Equating marginal revenue and marginal cost yields: 120 - Q = 60 +
2Q, or Q* = 20.

b. Here, R = 120Q; it follows that MR = 120. Equating MR and MC


yields: 120 = 60 + 2Q, or Q* = 30.

5. a. The firm exactly breaks even at the quantity Q such that  = 120Q -
[420 + 60Q] = 0. Solving for Q, we find 60Q = 420 or Q = 7 units.

b. In the general case, we set:  = PQ - [F + cQ] = 0. Solving for Q, we


have: (P - c)Q = F or Q = F/(P - c). This formula makes intuitive sense.
The firm earns a margin (or contribution) of (P - c) on each unit sold.
Dividing this margin into the fixed cost reveals the number of units
needed to exactly cover the firm’s total fixed costs.

c. Here, MR = 120 and MC = dC/dQ = 60. Because MR and MC are both


constant and distinct, it is impossible to equate them. The modified rule
is to expand output as far as possible (up to capacity), because MR >
MC.

6. a. If DVDs are given away (P = $0), demand is predicted to be: Q = 1600


- (200)(0) = 1,600 units. At this output, firm A’s cost is: 1,200 +
(2)(1,600) =$4,400, and firm B’s cost is: (4)(1,600) = $6,400. Firm A
is the cheaper option and should be chosen. (In fact, firm A is cheaper
as long as Q > 600.)

b. To maximize profit, we simply set MR = MC for each supplier and


compare the maximum profit attainable from each. We know that MR
= 8 - Q/100 and the marginal costs are MCA = 2 and MCB = 4. Thus,
for firm A, we find: 8 - QA/100 = 2, and so QA = 600 and PA = $5

John Wiley & Sons


2-15
(from the price equation). For firm B, we find QB = 400 and PB = $6.
With Firm A, the station’s profit is: 3,000 - [1,200 + (2)(600)] = $600.
With Firm B, its profit is 2,400 - 1,600 = $800. Thus, an order of 400
DVDs from firm B (priced at $6 each) is optimal.

7. a. The marginal cost per book is MC = 40 + 10 = $50. (The marketing


costs are fixed, so the $10 figure mentioned is an average fixed cost per
book.) Setting MR = MC, we find MR = 150 – 2Q = 50, implying Q* =
50 thousand books. In turn, P* = 150 –50 = $100 per book.

b. When the rival publisher raises its price dramatically, the firm’s
demand curve shifts upward and to the right. The new intersection of
MR and MC now occurs at a greater output. Thus, it is incorrect to try
to maintain sales via a full $15 price hike. For instance, in the case of a
parallel upward shift, P = 165 – Q. Setting MR = MC, we find: MR =
165 – 2Q = 50, implying Q* = 57.5 thousand books, and in turn, P* =
165 – 57.5 = $107.50 per book. Here, OS should increase its price by
only $7.50 (not $15).

c. By using an outside printer, OS is saving on fixed costs but is incurring


a higher marginal cost (i.e., printing cost) per book. With a higher
marginal cost, the intersection of MR and MC occurs at a lower
optimal quantity. OS should reduce its targeted sales quantity of the
text and raise the price it charges per book. Presumably, the fixed cost
savings outweighs the variable cost increase.

8. The fall in revenue from waiting each additional month is: MR = dR/dt
= -8. The reduction in cost of a month’s delay is: MC = dC/dt = -20 +
.5t. The optimal introduction date is found by equating MR and

John Wiley & Sons


2-16
MC: -8 = -20 + .5t, which implies: .5t = 12 or t* = 24 months. The
marketing manager’s 12-month target is too early. Delaying 12 more
months sacrifices revenue but more than compensates in reduced costs.

9. a. The MC per passenger is $20. Setting MR = MC, we find 120 - .2Q =


20, so Q = 500 passengers (carried by 5 planes). The fare is $70 and
the airline’s weekly profit is: $35,000 - 10,000 = $25,000.

b. If it carries the freight, the airline can fly only 4 passenger flights, or
400 passengers. At this lower volume of traffic, it can raise its ticket
price to P = $80. Its total revenue is (80)(400) + 4,000 = $36,000.
Since this is greater than its previous revenue ($35,000) and its costs
are the same, the airline should sign the freight agreement.

10. The latter view is correct. The additional post-sale revenues increase
MR, effectively shifting the MR curve up and to the right. The new
intersection of MR and MC occurs at a higher output, which, in turn,
implies a cut in price. (Of course, one must discount the additional
profit from service and supplies to take into account the time value of
money.)

11. Setting MR = MC, one has: a – 2bQ = c, so that Q = (a - c)/2b. We


substitute this expression into the price equation to obtain:
P = a - b[(a - c)/2b] = a - (a - c)/2 = a/2 + c/2 = (a + c)/2.
The firm’s optimal quantity increases after a favorable shift in demand −
either an increase in the intercept (a) or a fall in the slope (b). But quantity
decreases if it becomes more costly to produce extra units, that is., if the
marginal cost (c) increases. Price is raised after a favorable demand shift
(an increase in a) or after an increase in marginal cost (c). Note that only
$.50 of each dollar of cost increase is passed on to the consumer in the
form of a higher price.

John Wiley & Sons


2-17
*12. The Burger Queen (BQ) facts are P = 3 - Q/800 and MC = $.80.
a. Set MR = 0 to find BQ’s revenue-maximizing Q and P. Thus, we have
3 - Q/400 = 0, so Q = 1,200 and P = $1.50. Total revenue is $1,800
and BQ’s share is 20% or $360. The franchise owner’s revenue is
$1,440, its costs are (.8)(1,200) = $960, so its profit is $480.

b. The franchise owner maximizes its profit by setting MR = MC. Note


that the relevant MR is (.8)(3 - Q/400) = 2.4 - Q/500. After setting MR
= .80, we find Q = 800. In turn, P = $2.00 and the parties’ total profit
is (2.00 - .80)(800) = $960, which is considerably larger than $840, the
total profit in part (a).

c. Regardless of the exact split, both parties have an interest in


maximizing total profit, and this is done by setting (full) MR equal to
MC. Thus, we have 3 - Q/400 = .80, so that Q = 880. In turn, P =
$1.90, and total profit is: (1.90 - .80)(880) = $968.

d. The chief disadvantage of profit sharing is that it is difficult, time-


consuming, and expensive for the parent company to monitor the
reported profits of the numerous franchises. Revenue is relatively easy
to check (from the cash register receipts) but costs are another matter.
Individual franchisees have an incentive to exaggerate the costs they
report in order to lower the measured profits from which the parent’s split
is determined. The difficulty in monitoring cost and profit is the main
strike against profit sharing.

Discussion Question
Suppose the firm considers expanding its direct sales force from 20 to,
say 23 sales people. Clearly, the firm should be able to estimate the
marginal cost of the typical additional sales person (wages plus fringe
benefits plus support costs including company vehicle). The additional

John Wiley & Sons


2-18
net profit generated by an additional sales person is a little more
difficult to predict. An estimate might be based on the average
profitability of its current sales force. A more detailed estimate might
judge how many new client contacts a salesperson makes, historically
what fraction of these contacts result in new business, what is the
average profit of these new accounts, and so on. If the marginal profit of
a sales person is estimated to be between $100,000 and $120,000 while
the marginal cost is $85,000, then the firm has a clear-cut course of action,
namely hire the additional 1, 2, or 3 employees.

Spreadsheet Problems

S1. a and b. Setting MR = MC implies: 800 – 4Q = 200 + Q. Therefore,


Q* = 120 parts and P* = $560.

c. To confirm these values on a spreadsheet, we maximize cell F7 by


changing cell B7. Maximum profit in cell F7 is $16,000.

S2. a. Given  = 20[A/(A+8)] –A, it follows that M = 20[8/(A+8)2] – 1.


2
Setting M = 0 implies (A+8) = 160, or A* = $4.649 million.

b. Confirm this value on your spreadsheet by maximizing cell F7 by


changing cell C7. Maximum profit in F7 is $2.702 million.

S3. a. To confirm these values on our spreadsheet, we maximize cell F7 by


changing cell B7. The optimal sales volume is: Q* = 2.4 million
units and the optimal price is P* = $210. Amazon’s margin on each
reader is: 210 – 126 = $84, and its maximum profit (or, more
precisely contribution) is $201.6 million.

b. We extend the spreadsheet by including contribution from sales of


e-books ($100 per kindle sold) in cell G7 and add this to Kindle

John Wiley & Sons


2-19
profit to compute total profit in cell H7. Maximizing total profit, we
find the new optimal solution to be: Q* = 3.829 million units and P*
= $160. (This price is close to current price levels for the Kindle.)
By lowering price, Amazon increases its Kindle sales. The increased
profit from e-books more than makes up for reduced Kindle profit.
Note that e-book profit is almost three times Kindle profit.
Amazon’s total profit comes to some $513.0 million.

Appendix Problems

1. When tax rates become very high, individuals will make great efforts
to shield their income from taxes. Furthermore, higher taxes will
discourage the taxed activities altogether. (In the extreme case of a
100% tax, there is no point in undertaking income-generating
activities.) Thus, a higher tax rate mean a smaller tax base.
Increasing the tax rate from zero, the revenue curve first increases,
eventually peaks, and then falls to zero (at a 100% tax). Thus, the
curve is shaped like an upside-down U.

2. a. B(t) = 80 - 100t. Therefore, R = 80t - 100t2. Setting MR = dR/dt = 0,


we find: 80 - 200t = 0, or t = .4.

b. B(t) = 80 - 240t2. Therefore, R = 80t - 240t3. Setting MR = dR/dt =


0, we find: 80 - 720t2 = 0. Therefore, t2 = 1/9, or t = 1/3.

c. B(t) = 80 - 80t.5. Therefore, R = 80t - 80t1.5. Setting MR = dR/dt = 0,


we find: 80 - 120t.5 = 0. Thus, t.5 = 2/3, or t = 4/9.

John Wiley & Sons


2-20
3. a.  = 20x - x2 + 16y - 2y2. Setting d/dx = 0 and d/dy = 0 implies
x = 10 and y = 4.

b. The Lagrangian is L =  + z(8 - x - y). Therefore, the optimality


conditions are: 20 - 2x - z = 0, 16 - 4y - z = 0, and x + y = 8. The
solution is x = 6, y = 2, and z = 8.

c. The Lagrangian is L =  + z(7.5 - x - .5y). Therefore, the optimality


conditions are: 20 - 2x - z = 0, 16 - 4y - .5z = 0, and x + .5y = 7.5.
The solution is x = 6, y = 3, and z = 8.

John Wiley & Sons


2-21
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
je ne saisirais pas le premier prétexte venu pour me dégager de ma
parole.
A ces mots, je partis d’un éclat de rire homérique, et m’étant
installé dans un fauteuil, aussi loin d’elle que possible : — C’est trop
fort, ma chère, lui dis-je. Vous verrez que le criminel, c’est moi ; que
vous avez à vous plaindre de mes trahisons et de mes perfidies ;
que l’autre soir, après vous avoir tendrement embrassée, je suis allé
tout courant offrir à une autre femme mon cœur et mes lèvres. Ne
pourriez-vous être sincère une fois dans votre vie et m’accorder que,
si vous êtes plus sensible que tendre, vous êtes encore plus
ambitieuse que sensible ? Le secret de votre conduite est dans le
mot de la bohémienne. Convenez que les femmes de votre
caractère ont la manie de courir deux gibiers à la fois, et que vous
vous êtes amusée à coucher en joue tour à tour un lapin, qui est
votre serviteur, et un lièvre qui s’est appelé tantôt le baron Grüneck,
tantôt M. de Mauserre. Le lièvre a gagné pays ; je vous défie bien de
rattraper le lapin.
Elle jeta un cri d’horreur, me somma de me taire, de ne pas
insulter à son amour ; pourtant elle finit par avouer qu’il y avait une
part de vérité dans mon explication. — Eh bien ! oui, je la confesse,
s’écria-t-elle d’une voix déchirante, hier encore j’avais deux âmes qui
se combattaient comme en champ clos. Dieu soit loué, l’une a
succombé, le malheur l’a foudroyée ; il n’y a plus de vivant en moi
que l’âme qui vous aime, qui est à vous tout entière.
Trois secondes après, avant que je m’en fusse avisé, elle s’était
agenouillée à mes pieds, et j’eus beau me débattre, elle s’empara de
vive force de mes deux mains. Que ne puis-je vous rendre les
emportements de son éloquence ! Elle me fit les déclarations les
plus tendres, les plus passionnées, que ma modestie se refuse à
répéter, à savoir qu’elle m’adorait, qu’elle avait eu envers moi des
torts inqualifiables ; — que, si je lui faisais grâce, elle emploierait sa
vie à les racheter ; que je serais aimé comme jamais homme ne
l’avait été ; que je ne me doutais pas des trésors d’enthousiasme et
de dévouement que renfermait son cœur ; qu’elle ne vivrait, ne
respirerait que pour moi ; que je serais son tout, son univers, son
idéal et son dieu.
Au risque d’être taxé par vous de fatuité, j’oserai avancer qu’en
ce moment elle était sincère ; j’ajoute que, sincère ou non, elle était
étrangement belle, d’une beauté qui tenait tout à la fois du diable et
de l’ange. La douleur et la passion semblaient modeler son visage
comme le doigt du sculpteur la terre molle qu’il façonne ; il y avait sur
son cou, sur ses joues, sur son front, un jeu d’ombres et de lumières
dont je désespère de retrouver le secret. Dans la vivacité de son
action, ses cheveux s’étaient défaits et se répandaient en désordre
sur ses épaules ; sa guimpe aussi avait essuyé quelque avarie et
laissait à mon regard une périlleuse liberté. Elle avait les lèvres
ardentes ; ses yeux noyés ne quittaient pas les miens. Ils me
disaient clairement : — Ne vois-tu pas que je suis à toi ? Fais de moi
ce qu’il te plaira ! — Ils disaient aussi par manière d’a parte : — Si tu
succombes à la tentation, tu me garderas, et je t’épouserai.
Ce fut, madame, un moment critique. J’étais fort ému, je respirais
avec effort, ma tête s’allumait comme une rampe d’opéra, et je ne
sais en vérité comment cette scène aurait fini, quand il arriva tout à
coup… Madame, il arriva tout simplement qu’un des coqs du
château se mit à chanter à gorge déployée dans son pailler, et sa
voix claire, perçante, métallique et guerrière me fit bondir dans mon
fauteuil. Je revis mon père à son lit de mort : il me regardait. Le coq
chanta de nouveau ; j’entendis le tonnelier de Beaune qui me criait :
Tony, la vie est un combat ; défie-toi de tes entraînements ! — Et, le
coq ayant pour la troisième fois sonné sa fanfare, je contemplai
fixement Meta ; il me parut que ses grands yeux limpides
ressemblaient à ces beaux lacs africains aux eaux d’azur, dans
lesquels il y a des crocodiles.
Elle m’observait avec anxiété, se demandant à qui j’en avais. Je
la repoussai doucement, je me remis sur mes pieds, je la contraignis
d’en faire autant ; je la pris par le bras, je traversai la chambre avec
elle, j’ouvris la porte, je lui montrai du doigt le corridor, l’escalier et la
lampe qui les éclairait. Elle eut une défaillance, elle en triompha sur-
le-champ. Froissant ses cheveux dans ses mains, elle me cria d’un
ton prophétique et comme saisie subitement des fureurs d’une
sibylle : — Maudite soit la femme que tu aimeras ! — Cela dit, elle
disparut comme un fantôme.
Trois heures plus tard, elle avait quitté les Charmilles, où son
départ laissait quelques cœurs soulagés et une petite fille tout à fait
inconsolable. En voyant s’ébranler la voiture qui emmenait sa
gouvernante, la pauvre enfant perça l’air de ses cris.
Est-il nécessaire d’ajouter que M. et Mme de Mauserre sont
mariés ? Lulu n’aura plus d’autre institutrice que sa mère, qui depuis
son aventure est devenue un peu moins confiante et un peu plus
matineuse. M. de Mauserre est rentré dans la vie publique par la
députation ; il siége à la chambre dans la partie la plus raisonnable
du centre droit, mais en ayant soin de voter quelquefois contre le
gouvernement. On assurait l’autre jour qu’il était à la veille d’obtenir
un poste considérable.
Une nuit de l’hiver dernier, je faisais route de Lyon à Valence, où
j’allais voir un ami. Je partis de la gare de Perrache seul dans mon
wagon, dont la lampe éclairait faiblement. Je rabattis mon bonnet
fourré sur mes yeux, je m’allongeai sur un coussin, et je
commençais à m’endormir, lorsque à Vienne trois femmes montèrent
dans mon compartiment. A leur costume, je les reconnus pour des
diaconesses protestantes, et par quelques propos, que je saisis à la
volée, je crus comprendre qu’elles se rendaient en Italie pour y
diriger une école évangélique. Elles étaient jeunes et fort jaseuses ;
parlant allemand, elles ne firent pas difficulté de continuer leur
conversation devant moi. Le visage enfoui dans le collet de ma
pelisse, je ne donnais aucun signe de vie ; Dieu sait pourtant que je
les écoutais.
L’une des trois paraissait exercer sur les deux autres le prestige
d’une abbesse, et, quoique sa voix fût douce, elle avait un ton
d’autorité où il entrait une nuance de hauteur. A propos de la
dernière guerre, elle en vint à dire que les Français sont un peuple
aimable, mais très-immoral et très-corrompu ; comme pièce à
l’appui, elle rapporta et déposa qu’elle était entrée comme institutrice
dans une maison française où se trouvait un peintre de grand
renom ; que dès le premier jour il s’était permis de lui faire un aveu à
la hussarde ; que le père de son élève, s’étant déclaré à son tour,
avait tout mis en œuvre pour la séduire ; que ces deux coqs
amoureux et fous de jalousie avaient failli se couper la gorge, et que,
pour se soustraire à leurs obsession, elle s’était vue réduite à
s’enfuir une nuit à travers mille périls, dont la grâce du ciel l’avait
sauvée.
Quand le train atteignit Valence, la conversation avait cessé. Les
deux plus jeunes de ces filles de Sion dormaient du sommeil de
l’innocence ; la troisième, celle qui parlait si bien, les yeux à demi
clos, rêvait à son passé ou à son avenir. Avant de descendre de
wagon, je me penchai vers elle, et à sa vive surprise je lui récitai les
deux premiers vers du Roi de Thulé, que je pris la liberté, — Goethe
me le pardonne ! — de retoucher un peu : « Il y avait à Thulé, lui dis-
je à l’oreille, une petite souris qui mentit jusqu’à son lit de mort. »

Es war ein Maüschen in Thule


Das log bis an das Grab.

Vous me demanderez, madame, si j’y pense encore à cette


souris, et si dans le fond du cœur… Ceci est mon secret ; devinez.
Vous me demanderez aussi ce qu’il faut conclure de mon histoire,
car vous n’aimez pas les histoires qui ne concluent point. La mienne
prouve qu’il est utile de savoir ce que signifie le chant du coq ; si
mon père ne m’avait enseigné cette belle science, je ferais peut-être
aujourd’hui le voyage de la vie avec une compagne bien distinguée,
mais bien dangereuse. Ensuite mon histoire vous explique pourquoi,
en m’offrant la main d’une charmante fille qui a des yeux célestes,
vous m’avez mis en défiance. J’en conviens, les yeux célestes me
font peur ; il y faut regarder de près et jusqu’au fond. Dieu vous
bénisse, madame, vous qui n’avez pas deux âmes, et qu’il nous
préserve à tout jamais des terrains glissants, des chemins à
fondrières, des volontés flottantes, des caractères équivoques, des
cœurs troubles et des consciences subtiles !
FIN
*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK META
HOLDENIS ***

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions


will be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S.


copyright law means that no one owns a United States copyright
in these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and
distribute it in the United States without permission and without
paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General
Terms of Use part of this license, apply to copying and
distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the
PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and trademark. Project
Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if
you charge for an eBook, except by following the terms of the
trademark license, including paying royalties for use of the
Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is
very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such
as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
research. Project Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and
printed and given away—you may do practically ANYTHING in
the United States with eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright
law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license, especially
commercial redistribution.

START: FULL LICENSE


THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the


free distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this
work (or any other work associated in any way with the phrase
“Project Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of
the Full Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or
online at www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and


Redistributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works
1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™
electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand,
agree to and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual
property (trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to
abide by all the terms of this agreement, you must cease using
and return or destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works in your possession. If you paid a fee for
obtaining a copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg™
electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the terms
of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only


be used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by
people who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement.
There are a few things that you can do with most Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works even without complying with the
full terms of this agreement. See paragraph 1.C below. There
are a lot of things you can do with Project Gutenberg™
electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement and
help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™
electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the
Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the
collection of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the
individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the
United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright
law in the United States and you are located in the United
States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from copying,
distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative works
based on the work as long as all references to Project
Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope that you will
support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting free
access to electronic works by freely sharing Project
Gutenberg™ works in compliance with the terms of this
agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg™ name
associated with the work. You can easily comply with the terms
of this agreement by keeping this work in the same format with
its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when you share it
without charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside
the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to
the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying,
displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works
based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The
Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright
status of any work in any country other than the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project


Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other


immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must
appear prominently whenever any copy of a Project
Gutenberg™ work (any work on which the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed,
viewed, copied or distributed:

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United


States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it
away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg
License included with this eBook or online at
www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United
States, you will have to check the laws of the country where
you are located before using this eBook.

1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is


derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to
anyone in the United States without paying any fees or charges.
If you are redistributing or providing access to a work with the
phrase “Project Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the
work, you must comply either with the requirements of
paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use
of the work and the Project Gutenberg™ trademark as set forth
in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is


posted with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and
distribution must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through
1.E.7 and any additional terms imposed by the copyright holder.
Additional terms will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™
License for all works posted with the permission of the copyright
holder found at the beginning of this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project


Gutenberg™ License terms from this work, or any files
containing a part of this work or any other work associated with
Project Gutenberg™.
1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute
this electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1
with active links or immediate access to the full terms of the
Project Gutenberg™ License.

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form,
including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if
you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project
Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or
other format used in the official version posted on the official
Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at
no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a
means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other
form. Any alternate format must include the full Project
Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,


performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™
works unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or


providing access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works provided that:

• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive
from the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using
the method you already use to calculate your applicable
taxes. The fee is owed to the owner of the Project
Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has agreed to donate
royalties under this paragraph to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or
are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns.
Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at
the address specified in Section 4, “Information about
donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”

• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who


notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt
that s/he does not agree to the terms of the full Project
Gutenberg™ License. You must require such a user to return
or destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical
medium and discontinue all use of and all access to other
copies of Project Gutenberg™ works.

• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full


refund of any money paid for a work or a replacement copy,
if a defect in the electronic work is discovered and reported
to you within 90 days of receipt of the work.

• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project


Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different
terms than are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain
permission in writing from the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, the manager of the Project Gutenberg™
trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3
below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend


considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on,
transcribe and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright
law in creating the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite
these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the
medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,”
such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt
data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other
medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES -


Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in
paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
and any other party distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic
work under this agreement, disclaim all liability to you for
damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees. YOU
AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE,
STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH
OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH
1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER
THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR
ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE
OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF
THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If


you discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of
receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you
paid for it by sending a written explanation to the person you
received the work from. If you received the work on a physical
medium, you must return the medium with your written
explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the
defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu
of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or
entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund.
If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund
in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set


forth in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’,
WITH NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR
ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied


warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this
agreement violates the law of the state applicable to this
agreement, the agreement shall be interpreted to make the
maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by the applicable
state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of
this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the


Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the
Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any
volunteers associated with the production, promotion and
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless
from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that
arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project
Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or
deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any Defect
you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of


Project Gutenberg™
Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new
computers. It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of
volunteers and donations from people in all walks of life.
Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
assistance they need are critical to reaching Project
Gutenberg™’s goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™
collection will remain freely available for generations to come. In
2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was
created to provide a secure and permanent future for Project
Gutenberg™ and future generations. To learn more about the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your
efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the
Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project


Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-
profit 501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the
laws of the state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by
the Internal Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal
tax identification number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax
deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S. federal laws and
your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500


West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact
links and up to date contact information can be found at the
Foundation’s website and official page at
www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to


the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation
Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without
widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission
of increasing the number of public domain and licensed works
that can be freely distributed in machine-readable form
accessible by the widest array of equipment including outdated
equipment. Many small donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly
important to maintaining tax exempt status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws


regulating charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of
the United States. Compliance requirements are not uniform
and it takes a considerable effort, much paperwork and many
fees to meet and keep up with these requirements. We do not
solicit donations in locations where we have not received written
confirmation of compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or
determine the status of compliance for any particular state visit
www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states


where we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know
of no prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from
donors in such states who approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot


make any statements concerning tax treatment of donations
received from outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp
our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current


donation methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a
number of other ways including checks, online payments and
credit card donations. To donate, please visit:
www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project


Gutenberg™ electronic works
Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could
be freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose
network of volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several


printed editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by
copyright in the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus,
we do not necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any
particular paper edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™,


including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new
eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear
about new eBooks.

You might also like