Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full download Sartre on Sin: Between Being and Nothingness Kate Kirkpatrick file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download Sartre on Sin: Between Being and Nothingness Kate Kirkpatrick file pdf all chapter on 2024
https://ebookmass.com/product/body-utopianism-prosthetic-being-
between-enhancement-and-estrangement-franziska-bork-petersen/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-will-to-nothingness-an-essay-
on-nietzsches-on-the-genealogy-of-morality-reginster/
https://ebookmass.com/product/anxiety-and-wonder-on-being-human-
maria-balaska/
https://ebookmass.com/product/heidegger-on-being-self-concealing-
katherine-withy/
Being and Reason: An Essay on Spinoza's Metaphysics
Martin Lin
https://ebookmass.com/product/being-and-reason-an-essay-on-
spinozas-metaphysics-martin-lin/
https://ebookmass.com/product/just-words-on-speech-and-hidden-
harm-mary-kate-mcgowan/
https://ebookmass.com/product/and-then-i-turned-into-a-
mermaid-2-dont-tell-him-im-a-mermaid-laura-kirkpatrick-
kirkpatrick/
https://ebookmass.com/product/and-then-i-turned-into-a-mermaid-
laura-kirkpatrick/
https://ebookmass.com/product/being-and-not-being-2nd-edition-
richard-iveson/
OXFORD THEOLOGY A ND R ELIGION M ONOGRAPHS
Editorial Committee
D . ACH AR YA M. N . A. B O CK M UEH L
M . J. ED WAR D S P. S. F I DD ES
S . R . I . F OO T D. N. J. MACCULLOCH
H . N A JM A N G . WAR D
OXFORD THEOLOGY AND RELIGION MONOGRAPHS
KATE KIRKPATRICK
1
3
Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP,
United Kingdom
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship,
and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of
Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries
© Kate Kirkpatrick 2017
The moral rights of the author have been asserted
First Edition published in 2017
Impression: 1
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in
a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the
prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted
by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics
rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the
above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the
address above
You must not circulate this work in any other form
and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer
Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press
198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Data available
Library of Congress Control Number: 2017942086
ISBN 978–0–19–881173–2
Printed and bound by
CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY
Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and
for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials
contained in any third party website referenced in this work.
Acknowledgements
This research would not have been possible were it not for the support
of many individuals and institutions. I am grateful for the support of
the AHRC’s Block Grant Partnership for funding this project; to
St Cross College, the Faculty of Theology and Religion, and the
Udo Keller Stiftung Forum Humanum for travel grants that enabled
me to present work in progress at several conferences during the
period of research; and to the Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript
Library at Yale University and Grégory Cormann for their assistance
in procuring the ‘Sartre’s Readings of Youth’ manuscript and mémoire,
respectively.
TORCH, the Maison Française d’Oxford, and the UK Sartre Society
supported the ‘Thinking with Sartre Today/Penser avec Sartre au-
jourd’hui’ conference I co-organized at the Maison Française d’Oxford
(30–31 January 2015), which was a source of both research leads and
relationships—in particular with Ârash Aminian-Tabrizi and Marieke
Mueller, whom I thank for their collaboration and camaraderie.
Several scholars have read and commented on aspects of this work
at various stages of its development. I am especially grateful to Pamela
Sue Anderson and George Pattison for the care and commitment they
have shown this project; to OUP’s anonymous reviewers; as well as
to Graham Ward, Joel Rasmussen, James Hanvey SJ, Katherine Morris,
Clare Carlisle, and Stephen Mulhall; and to Richard Parish, who
generously met with me to discuss Pascal’s works and twentieth-
century reception.
Excerpts from Jean-Paul Sartre, Being and Nothingness, translated
by Hazel Barnes © 1958 and the Philosophical Library (US & Canada)
and Routledge (UK & rest of world), are reproduced by permission
of the Philosophical Library Inc (philosophicallibrary.com) and by
Taylor & Francis Books UK. All rights reserved.
Finally I would like to acknowledge, with gratitude, the support
and love of my family. In particular, I would like to thank Matt—for
his encouragement and partnership, in words and in deeds.
Contents
References 243
Index 259
Chronology of Sartre’s Works, 1924–46
Dates are dates of publication unless given in parentheses, in which case they
are dates of writing for works that were published later or that remain
unpublished. English titles are given in square brackets for works that have
been translated into English. This chronology ends at 1946 because this book
concerns Sartre’s pre-humanist phase, i.e. Sartre’s philosophy before Exist-
entialism is a Humanism.
I have used the Hazel Barnes translation of L’Être et le néant, although there
are some instances where I have found it necessary to cite the French, in
particular where the same English word is used for different French words
with different theological connotations. These instances are noted at relevant
points in the argument. Where citations refer to other works in French
(by Sartre or others) and cited matter is in English all translations are the
author’s own unless otherwise stated.
Part I
Introduction
1
Hopkins 1994: 113.
2
By ‘ambiguous’ I mean that there are many possible interpretations (see Gellman
2009; Kirkpatrick 2013; Gillespie 2013, 2014; Chabot 2016). I will elaborate on this in
the next section of this chapter.
3
Lévy (2003) dubbed him ‘the philosopher of the twentieth century’.
4 5
Economist 2003. Economist 2003.
4 Sartre on Sin
necessary depth. Several readers of Sartre have made passing com-
ments on resemblances between Being and Nothingness and Christian-
ity in general,6 and in particular to the doctrine of original sin and to
its interpreters, St Augustine,7 Kierkegaard,8 or Kant.9 In the English-
speaking philosophical literature Stephen Mulhall notes Sartre’s
‘Christian theological horizons’;10 Merold Westphal describes Sartre
as a ‘secular theologian of original sin’;11 Robert Solomon and Jonathan
Webber note similarities between bad faith and original sin;12 and
Hans van Stralen notes the close similarity between Sartre’s later view
of history and original sin.13
That there is no sustained scholarly work exploring the reputed
relationship between Sartre and sin can be explained on historical,
textual, and theological bases. Historically, Sartre’s existentialism is
just beginning to emerge from a period in scholarly purgatoire: it has
been seen by many as ‘of its time’—a philosophy of the post-war
period for the post-war period—or even as the ‘height of kitsch’.14
Textually, there is a neat proof text for Sartre’s disbelief in sin: in the
War Diaries he wrote that ‘what is certain is that from the start I had a
morality without God—without sin, but not without Evil’.15 And
theologically, the most common objection I have encountered to
this project is that ‘Sartre didn’t have a theological formation!’ How
could he keep theological concepts?
Cognizant that the latter two reasons for dismissal posed a greater
threat to my argument than the first, this research, therefore, initially
set out to test earlier scholars’ claims of resemblance—to compare
Sartre’s ontology of freedom to Augustine’s ontology of sin—and to
see what case (if any) could be made for Sartre having a ‘theological’
formation. On both historical and textual bases the research
found that Sartre’s intellectual formation included a theological elem-
ent which is often overlooked by Sartre scholars—especially in the
6
See Kirkpatrick 2017 on the influence of theology on Sartre and Sartre on twentieth-
century theology.
7
Westphal 2010: 172.
8
Theunissen writes that ‘In a certain sense, Sartre even incorporates Kierkegaard’s
theological conception of sin’ (2005: 31).
9
Philonenko suggests radical evil, rather than ‘original sin’, as the problem Sartre
sought to address (1981: 154), although radical evil itself can be considered a ‘secu-
larization’ or, in Kant’s case, a philosophical version, of original sin.
10
Mulhall 2005: 13, 31. See also Harries 2004: 28.
11 12
See Westphal 2010: 172. Webber 2009: 143; Solomon 2006: 13.
13 14 15
Van Stralen 2005: 182. Lévy 2003: 3. WD 70.
Introduction 5
English-speaking philosophical community, where his German phe-
nomenological influences receive greater attention. Moreover, it found
that this theology was indeed Augustinian, but it was the Augustinian-
ism of l’école française de spiritualité and Jansenism, in both of which
the concept of le néant (nothingness) plays a profound role.
Before presenting my own reading of Being and Nothingness, there-
fore, I must advance a preliminary contention: namely, that the recep-
tion of Being and Nothingness among English-speaking philosophers
has placed such an emphasis on Sartre’s position in (or deviation from)
the German phenomenological tradition that it has missed significant
formative influences on his thought. In particular, I argue, French
theological and literary traditions are in evidence, but since these are
less well known to Anglo-American philosophers—or not considered
to be ‘philosophy’16—the text is often not read for this register.17
Sartre himself is partly to blame for the ease with which it can be
overlooked. In Sartre’s self-contextualization in Being and Nothingness
he frequently defines himself in agreement or opposition with ‘les trois
Hs’—Hegel, Husserl, and Heidegger—and with Descartes; theological
figures are rarely named. But this, I argue, is because Sartre’s own
methodology involved what I will call a ‘morganatic marriage’.
Sartre clearly drew on the German phenomenological tradition. But
his philosophical education was well under way by the time he encoun-
tered phenomenology in the early 1930s. English-speaking commen-
tators note his debts to Descartes and Bergson, but Sartre’s intellectual
formation did not just expose him to thinkers respected by the English-
speaking canon of philosophy, but to theological writers—whether
they went by the other names of mystiques or moralistes.
Where ‘mystics’ are concerned, Sartre’s little-studied ‘mémoire’ for
the Diplôme d’Études Supérieures (written in 1926–7) was dedicated
to the ‘image’ and included a section on Christian mystics. The work,
16
Roger Scruton, for example, notes that the French have ‘a completely different
conception of what philosophy is’ (2014: n.p.).
17
See, e.g., Flynn’s intellectual biography (2014), which starts in the 1930s with
Sartre’s discovery of phenomenology; or Catalano 1985, which moves from ‘Des-
cartes’ to ‘Husserl’ in its treatment of Sartre’s ‘background’. Many English-language
texts neglect his earlier intellectual development. Cormann 2015 (in French) examines
one of Sartre’s pre-phenomenological philosophical interlocutors (Alain), but there is
very little work devoted to this early formation in English. The ‘Sartre’s readings in
youth’ MS is helpful in this respect, for showing the sources that Sartre took to be
significant in his early development.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
with swelling heart. He hesitated. Was it his imagination? He gazed a
moment. The bush bent again, and the head of the little wanderer
was seen! He rushed forward, and found the little girl seated upon a
log, and breaking the twigs she had plucked from the bush which so
providentially led to her discovery. She did not appear to be
frightened; said she had lain in the woods three nights, and had not
seen or heard any wild beasts, and that she thought she should get
to Mr. Howard’s for the flour before night! At first she did not appear
hungry or weak, but after eating a piece of bread her cries for more
were very piteous. She was found about three miles from where she
entered the woods. Her clothing was very thin, and the large shawl
she had on when she left home she had carefully folded and placed
in the pillowcase, not even putting it over her during the night, as she
innocently said, ‘to keep from dirtying it, or her mother would whip
her.’ Our informant states that she is now as well and happy as the
other children.”
CHAPTER XI.
CHAPTER III.