Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What Makes Effective Whistleblowing: Global Comparative Studies From The Public And Private Sector 1st Edition Edition Carmen R. Apaza full chapter instant download
What Makes Effective Whistleblowing: Global Comparative Studies From The Public And Private Sector 1st Edition Edition Carmen R. Apaza full chapter instant download
https://ebookmass.com/product/public-private-families-1st-
edition-andrew-j-cherlin/
https://ebookmass.com/product/professional-service-firms-and-
politics-in-a-global-era-public-policy-private-expertise-1st-
edition-chris-hurl/
https://ebookmass.com/product/whistleblowing-and-the-
sociological-imagination-1st-edition-tina-uys/
Assessing Progress Towards Sustainability: Frameworks,
Tools and Case Studies 1st Edition Carmen Teodosiu
https://ebookmass.com/product/assessing-progress-towards-
sustainability-frameworks-tools-and-case-studies-1st-edition-
carmen-teodosiu/
https://ebookmass.com/product/public-vs-private-the-early-
history-of-school-choice-in-america-gross/
https://ebookmass.com/product/public-private-partnerships-in-
health-improving-infrastructure-and-technology-1st-edition-
veronica-vecchi/
https://ebookmass.com/product/kazakhstans-diversification-from-
the-natural-resources-sector-strategic-and-economic-
opportunities-1st-edition-irina-heim/
https://ebookmass.com/product/financing-nature-based-solutions-
exploring-public-private-and-blended-finance-models-and-case-
studies-robert-c-brears/
What Makes Effective
Whistleblowing
Global Comparative
Studies from the Public
and Private Sector
Edited by
Carmen R. Apaza
Yongjin Chang
What Makes Effective Whistleblowing
Carmen R. Apaza • Yongjin Chang
Editors
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer
Nature Switzerland AG 2020
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the
Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of
translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on
microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval,
electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now
known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this
publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are
exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information
in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the
publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to
the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The
publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and
institutional affiliations.
This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature
Switzerland AG.
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Contents
2 Whistleblowing in Belgium 11
Frankie Schram
3 Whistleblowing in Brazil 31
Carmen R. Apaza
4 Whistleblowing in Finland 49
Olli-Pekka Viinamäki, Niina Mäntylä, and Annukka Jokipii
v
vi Contents
Index113
List of Tables
vii
Introduction
ix
x Introduction
Reference
Apaza, C., & Chang, Y. (2011). What makes whistleblowing effective:
Whistleblowing in Peru and South Korea. Public Integrity, 13(2), 113–130.
CHAPTER 1
C. R. Apaza (*)
Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, Lima, Peru
Y. Chang
Faculty of Global Management, Chuo University, Tokyo, Japan
e-mail: yongjin.01g@g.chuo-u.ac.jp
4. No retaliation
An effective whistleblowing means that the whistleblower did not
suffer a brutal retaliation. But in the real world a whistleblower
always suffers a certain level of retaliation, which may be defined as
an undesirable action taken against a whistleblower (Rehg et al.
2008). These actions include intimidation (Guerrero 2018) nega-
tive performance appraisals, inappropriate work assignments or
transfer, threats of physical harm, harassment, humiliation, or isola-
tion (Park et al. 2018), sent to jail (Jakes 2003), dismissal or even
killed (Devraj 2003).
When the whistle was blown through internal channels public
organizations common retaliations include: denial of a job promo-
tion (Apaza 2008), dismissal or forcing to resignation (Jos et al.
1989) or to retire (Rothschild and Miethe 1999).
But when the whistle was blown through external channels, orga-
nizations used more comprehensive forms of retaliation against
external reporting (Dworkin and Baucus 1998).
In any case, retaliation frequently happens after the whistleblow-
ing (Guerrero 2018; Kenny et al. 2018), and it is closely associated
with whistleblowing intention (Cho and Song 2015). Nevertheless,
in the dimension of an effective whistleblowing retaliation should be
prevented through a well-established and implemented whistle-
blowing legal protection system (Apaza and Chang 2017).
5. Legal protection
The existence of a legal protection system for whistleblowers is basic
for an effective whistleblowing. Recently many whistleblowing pro-
tection laws have been issued and implemented (Amoedo 2017).
Based on our case studies we find that whistleblowing were more
effective in countries where there was a legal protection system
already implemented for whistleblowers.
2 Methodology
To evaluate the aforementioned factors influencing effective whistleblow-
ing, we apply the case study method, as in the previous edition. A case
study is an empirical inquiry that investigates a contemporary phenome-
non within its real-life context, especially when the boundaries between
phenomenon and context are not clearly evident (Yin 2003, p. 13, 2009,
p. 18). The case study method is well suited to whistleblowing research
because it can show conditional findings in detail and can examine interac-
tions of a cause-and-effect relationship (Jensen and Rodgers 2001).
Moreover, the case study method helps to do an in-depth study of an
organization culture (Benson and Ross 1998), which is crucial for under-
standing why whistleblowers decide not to blow the whistle within their
own organizations.
1 EFFECTIVE WHISTLEBLOWING CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK 7
References
Amoedo, D. (2017). Elementos Esenciales para un Sistema de Protección de
Denunciantes. R.I.T.I. 4 (Mayo-Agosto 2017).
Apaza, C. (2008, June). Whistleblowing and the federal employee: Effective legal
protection, open communication and organizational attitude. PA Times,
ASPA. Special Section, p. 6.
Apaza, C. (2017). Whistleblowing in Peru. In Chapter in whistleblowing in the
world. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Apaza, C., & Chang, Y. (2011). What makes whistleblowing effective:
Whistleblowing in Peru and South Korea. Public Integrity, 13(2), 113–130.
Apaza, C., & Chang, Y. (2017). Whistleblowing in the world. Cham: Palgrave
Macmillan.
Banisar, D. (2006, March 23–25). Whistleblowing international standards and
developments. Paper presented at the Primera Conferencia International Sobre
Corruption y Transparencia, Ciudad de Mexico.
Benson, J. A., & Ross, D. L. (1998). Sundstrand: A case study in transformation
of cultural ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(14), 1517–1527.
Callahan, E. S., & Dworkin, T. M. (1994). Who blows the whistle to the media,
and why organizational characteristics of media whistleblowers. American
Business Law Journal, 32(2), 151–184.
8 C. R. APAZA AND Y. CHANG
Rehg, M. T., Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P., & Van Scotter, J. R. (2008). Antecedents
and outcomes of retaliation against whistleblowers: Gender differences and
power relationships. Organization Science, 19(2), 221–240.
Rosen, B. (1998). Holding government bureaucracies accountable (3rd ed.).
Westport: Praeger Publishers.
Rosenbloom, D. H. (1994). The use of case studies in public administrative edu-
cation in the USA. Journal of Management History, 1(1), 33–46.
Rosenbloom, D. H. (2003). Administrative law for public managers. Boulder:
Westview Press.
Rosenbloom, D. H. (2015). Administrative law for public managers (2nd ed.).
Boulder: Westview Press.
Rothschild, J. (2008). Freedom of speech denied, dignity assaulted: What the
whistleblowers experience in the US. Current Sociology, 56(6), 884–903.
Rothschild, J., & Miethe, T. D. (1999). Whistle-blower disclosures and manage-
ment retaliation. Work and Occupations, 26(1), 107–128.
Salas A. (2017, May 8). Are Latin America’s new whistleblowing Laws working?
Latin America Advisor.
Skivenes, M., & Trygstad, S. (2017). Explaining whistle blowing processes in the
Norwegian labour market: Between individual power resources and institu-
tional arrangements. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 38(1), 119–143.
Vandekerckhove, W. (2010). European whistleblowing policies: Tiers or tears? In
D. Lewis (Ed.), A global approach to public interest disclosure: What can we learn
from existing whistleblowing legislation and research? (pp. 15–35). Cheltenham:
Edward Elgar.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand
Oaks: Sage Publications.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand
Oaks: Sage Publications.
CHAPTER 2
Whistleblowing in Belgium
Frankie Schram
F. Schram (*)
Faculty of Social Science, Public Governance Institute, University KU Leuven,
Leuven, Belgium
e-mail: Frankie.schram@kuleuven.be
© The Author(s) 2020 11
C. R. Apaza, Y. Chang (eds.), What Makes Effective Whistleblowing,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40200-6_2
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
es souvenirs, ce soir, me séparent de toi;
Au-dessus de tes yeux, de ta voix qui me parle,
De ce frais horizon d’églises et de toits,
J’entends, dans ma mémoire où frémit leur émoi,
Les hirondelles sur le ciel d’Arles!