Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Oxford History of Phonology B. Elan Dresher (Editor) full chapter instant download
The Oxford History of Phonology B. Elan Dresher (Editor) full chapter instant download
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-oxford-handbook-of-the-history-
phenomenology-oxford-handbooks/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-oxford-illustrated-history-of-
the-renaissance-campbell/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-oxford-handbook-of-w-b-yeats-
lauren-arrington/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-concise-oxford-history-of-
music-abraham/
The Oxford Handbook of Commodity History Stubbs
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-oxford-handbook-of-commodity-
history-stubbs/
https://ebookmass.com/product/from-the-ashes-of-history-adam-b-
lerner/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-oxford-history-of-the-
reformation-peter-marshall/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-oxford-history-of-the-
renaissance-gordon-campbell/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-oxford-history-of-science-iwan-
rhys-morus/
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 17/2/2022, SPi
Contents
9. The Kazan School: Jan Baudouin de Courtenay and Mikołaj Kruszewski 179
Joanna Radwańska-Williams
10. Saussure and structural phonology 203
John E. Joseph
11. The Prague School: Nikolai Trubetzkoy and Roman Jakobson 221
Edwin Battistella
12. John R. Firth and the London School 242
Elena Battaner Moro and Richard Ogden
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 17/2/2022, SPi
vi
III. MID-TWENTIETH-CENTURY
DEVELOPMENTS IN PHONOLOGY
15. Phonology in the Soviet Union 309
Pavel Iosad
16. Phonology in Glossematics in Northern and Western Europe 331
Hans Basbøll
17. Mid-century American phonology: The post-Bloomfieldians 356
D. Robert Ladd
18. Developments leading towards generative phonology 372
B. Elan Dresher and Daniel Currie Hall
19. The Sound Pattern of English and early generative phonology 396
Michael J. Kenstowicz
vii
References 707
Name Index 817
Language Index 832
Subject Index 835
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 17/2/2022, SPi
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 17/2/2022, SPi
Figures
2.1. Planar taxonomy of writing systems 23
2.2. The sonority hierarchy 28
2.3. Blissymbols for ‘table’, ‘chair’, and ‘chest of drawers’ 35
2.4. Blissymbols for ‘love’ and ‘mind’ 35
2.5. Blissymbols for ‘writer’ and ‘taxes’ 35
2.6. Blissymbols for ‘horse’, ‘mule’, and ‘ass’ 35
2.7. ‘Red’, ‘orange’, ‘yellow’, ‘Persian blue’ 35
7.1. A sample of Steele’s Prosodia Rationalis analysis 136
7.2. Saran’s ganzes metrisches Gebäude exemplified 144
13.1. Sapir’s Language A: Full phonetic and ‘objective’ inventory of sound segments 270
13.2. Sapir’s Language A: Phonological structure posited 271
14.1. Signs for HAPPY, ACCENT, ACTOR, and DISAPPEAR 286
14.2. Sequential model of Liddell & Johnson (1985, 1989) 298
16.1. System of oppositions of the Danish vowels 343
18.1. Correspondences between ‘logical’ (phonetic) and ‘actual’ (phonological) oppositions 374
18.2. Consonant place features proposed by Jakobson ([1939a] 1962) 375
18.3. Cherry et al.’s (1953) contrastive hierarchy for Russian 384
18.4. Two orderings of [continuant] and [voiced] 391
18.5. Levels in post-Bloomfieldian American structuralist phonology 392
21.1. Feature geometry proposed by Clements (1985: 229) 451
21.2. Icelandic preaspiration rule (Clements 1985: 233) 452
29.1. Relationship between minimal pair count and merger, from Wedel, Kaplan,
& Jackson (2013: 183) 634
31.1. A finite-state acceptor and the set of strings it describes 658
31.2. Finite-state transducers corresponding to simultaneous (T₁) and iterative (T₂)
application of the rule a ! b / b __ 658
31.3. Derivation of the output of T₁ (left) and T₂ (right) for an input baaa. The first
row in each diagram shows the input string; the middle row shows the transition
between states given each input symbol; and the final row shows the output at
each transition 659
31.4. Autosegmental representation of the association of morphemes to produce the
surface form for the Arabic verb stem [kattab] ‘to write (caus.)’
(McCarthy 1979, 1986) 662
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 17/2/2022, SPi
31.5. Linearization under Kay (1987)’s proposal of the autosegmental diagram for
[kattab] (adapted from Bird & Ellison 1994). Here, G refers to the first of a
geminate consonant; this prevents the consonantal stem tape from moving forward 662
31.6. Examples of Kornai (1995)’s scanning code 663
31.7. A simple autosegmental representation and its corresponding synchronized FSA
from Bird & Ellison (1994: 67) 665
31.8. Constituent timeline representations for CVC.V (left) and CV.CV (right) 667
31.9. A weighted acceptor for C and V transitions 670
31.10. A fragment of a weighted context-free grammar for English syllable structure
(adapted from Coleman & Pierrehumbert 1997). (Only the rules generating the
syllable pæt are shown.) 671
31.11. Constraints with a stochastic ranking (Boersma & Hayes 2002) 672
31.12. Scanning interpretation of SL grammar 675
32.1. Natural language patterns within the Chomsky hierarchy 681
32.2. The subset principle 685
Tables
4.1. Correspondences between Chinese characters and kana syllabary 74
4.2. Modern gojūon-zu (table of sounds) 75
8.1. Differences between Neogrammarian change and lexical diffusion 173
11.1. Jakobsonian distinctive features 236
12.1. Carnochan’s analysis of the phonological structure of gemination in Hausa 247
12.2. Extract of the right part of Table 12.1 249
12.3. Orthography and phonological formulae for rows 2 and 3 of Table 12.1 250
12.4. Prosodic sub-systems of P3 for the formulae in Table 12.1 251
15.1. Examples of Russian verbal classes 314
15.2. Examples of morphologically conditioned alternations 315
16.1. System of oppositions of the Danish modulations 337
16.2. System of oppositions of the Danish accents 338
16.3. System of oppositions (glossemes) of the Danish consonants 340
o
16.4. System of oppositions of the category III of the French pseudo-consonants 347
o
16.5. System of oppositions of the category IV of the French pseudo-consonants 348
16.6. Høysgaard’s Aandelav representing four syllable types 350
18.1. Combining two binary features into one ternary one 376
27.1. Morphological boundaries and TD Deletion rates 578
27.2. TD Deletion in lexical phonology 580
27.3. Probability of TD Retention at each level 580
27.4. l-darkening processes that can apply to bell 581
27.5. l-darkening processes that can apply to mail it 581
27.6. Predicted TD Deletion rates given at most just one specified precedence relation 584
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 17/2/2022, SPi
List of Abbreviations
INF infinitive
IP Intonational Phrase
IPA International Phonetic Alphabet
IPFV imperfective aspect
KLC Kazan Linguistic Circle
KLV Kaye, Lowenstamm, and Vergnaud
KSN Koutsoudas, Sanders, & Noll
L light syllable
LAPSyD Lyon-Albuquerque Phonological Systems Database
LingPy Python library for historical linguistics
LOT Linear Optimality Theory
LSA Linguistic Society of America
LSJ Liddell, Scott, and Jones
maxent maximum entropy
ML Machine Learning
MLE Multicultural London English
MM Markedness Module
MSCs morpheme structure conditions (constraints)
MSR Main Stress Rule
NGP Natural Generative Phonology
NELS North East Linguistics Society
NLTK Natural Language Toolkit
NP noun phrase
NSF National Science Foundation
NP Natural Phonology
OCP Obligatory Contour Principle
OLD Oxford Latin Dictionary
OPOYAZ Society for the Study of Poetic Language
OT Optimality Theory
PCT Phonological CorpusTools
PIC Phase Impenetrability Condition
PISL Plains Indian Sign Language
PM Prosodic Morphology
P&P Principles and Parameters
PSA Preliminaries to Speech Analysis
PyNLPl Python library for Natural Language Processing
RANION The Russian Association of Research Institutes in the Social Sciences
RCD Recursive Constraint Demotion
RcvP Radical CV Phonology
SCC Strict Cycle Condition
SD structural description
SL Strictly Local
SLP-AA Sign Language Phonetic Annotator-Analyzer
SOAS School of Oriental and African Studies
SoL The Signs of Language
SPE The Sound Pattern of English
SPR The Sound Pattern of Russian
SR surface representation
SSC Surface Structure Constraints
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 17/2/2022, SPi
xv
The Contributors
Hans Basbøll was Professor of Scandinavian Linguistics at Odense (Southern Denmark) University
1975‒2012. He served as Dean and Prorector and on the Danish Language Council and Research
Council. He is a member of the Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters, the Austrian
Academy of Sciences (corresponding), and Academia Europaea. He has directed projects in language
acquisition and has published widely in phonology, morphology, and the history of linguistics,
focusing on syllable structure, prosody, interactions between phonology and morphology, and the
acquisition of morphology. His main work is The Phonology of Danish (including prosodic morph-
ology) at Oxford University Press (2005).
Elena Battaner Moro holds a degree in Hispanic Philology (1997) and a PhD in Linguistics (2002)
from the University of Salamanca. She is currently a tenured Associate Professor of General
Linguistics at Rey Juan Carlos University (Madrid, Spain). Her main lines of research focus on
linguistic historiography and phonology and phonetics, particularly forensic phonetics, Spanish
phonetics, history of phonetics, and Firthian phonology. In these areas, Dr Battaner has authored
or co-authored books, articles, and book chapters, presented invited talks and research papers at
national and international conferences, and served on committees and as a journal reviewer and
editor-in-chief.
Edwin Battistella teaches linguistics and writing at Southern Oregon University in Ashland, Oregon.
His book Markedness: The Evaluative Superstructure of Language was a study of the Prague School
principle of structural asymmetry as developed by Nikolai Trubetzkoy and Roman Jakobson. In his
later book The Logic of Markedness, Battistella more explicitly developed the connections between
Jakobson’s ideas and those of Noam Chomsky and Morris Halle, attempting to reconcile structuralist
and generative views. Battistella is the co-editor-in-chief of the Wiley-Blackwell journal Language
and Linguistics Compass, and he contributes a monthly blog to Oxford University Press, called
‘Between the Lines with Edwin Battistella’.
Georges Bohas is Professor Emeritus at École Normale Supérieure, Lyon. He has extensively published
on the phonology, morphology, and lexicon of Arabic and other Semitic languages, on the grammatical
tradition of Arabic and Aramaic, and on qur’anic metrics. He is the initiator of the Theory of Matrices
& Etymons. Along with other projects, Bohas is currently working on the eighteenth and final volume
of the Arabic edition of a popular version of the Romance of Baybars.
Andrea Calabrese was born in Campi Salentina in the southeastern tip of Italy. He obtained his PhD
in Linguistics at MIT in 1988 and is currently teaching at the University of Connecticut. His interests
are phonology, morphology, and historical linguistics. He has published more than eighty articles in
books and journals such as Brain and Language, Journal of Neurolinguistics, Isogloss, Linguistic
Inquiry, Morphology, Probus, Rivista di Linguistica, The Linguistic Review. His book, Markedness and
Economy in a Derivational Model of Phonology (Mouton de Gruyter, 2005) proposes a theory
integrating phonological rules and repairs triggered by markedness constraints into a derivational
model of phonology.
Jane Chandlee is an Assistant Professor in the Tri-Co Department of Linguistics at Haverford
College in Haverford, Pennsylvania. After earning her PhD from the University of Delaware in
2014 she was a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Nemours Biomedical Research Center for Pediatric
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 17/2/2022, SPi
Auditory and Speech Sciences and then a Visiting Assistant Professor in Computer Science at
Haverford before moving into her current position. Her research has appeared in the journals
Linguistic Inquiry, Phonology, Morphology, and the Transactions of the Association for
Computational Linguistics.
Bart de Boer works at the artificial intelligence laboratory of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, where he
investigates the evolution of speech using computer models. His interests are in modelling all aspects
of the evolution of linguistic signals, biological evolution of the anatomy related to speech, and of the
cognitive ability to deal with linguistic signals, as well as cultural evolution of systems of linguistic
signals. He uses population- and agent-based models, machine learning systems, and physical
simulation in his work.
B. Elan Dresher is Professor Emeritus of Linguistics at the University of Toronto. He received his
PhD (Linguistics) from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, in 1978. He has published on
phonological theory, learnability, historical linguistics, West Germanic and Biblical Hebrew phon-
ology and prosody, and the history of phonology. His books include Old English and the Theory of
Phonology (1985/2019) and The Contrastive Hierarchy in Phonology (2009). He is the author of ‘The
Phoneme’ in The Blackwell Companion to Phonology (2011) and articles on the history of contrast in
phonology.
San Duanmu is Professor of Linguistics, University of Michigan. He received his PhD in Linguistics
from MIT in 1990 and has held teaching posts at Fudan University, Shanghai (1981‒6), and the
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (1991‒present). His research focuses on general properties of
language, especially those in phonology. He is the author of The Phonology of Standard Chinese (2nd
edition, Oxford University Press, 2007), Syllable Structure: The Limits of Variation (Oxford
University Press, 2008), Foot and Stress (in Chinese, Beijing Language and Culture University
Press, 2016), and A Theory of Phonological Features (Oxford University Press, 2016).
Josef Fruehwald is an Assistant Professor at the University of Kentucky. He received his PhD from
the University of Pennsylvania in 2013. His research focuses on phonological and phonetic variation
and change, utilizing quantitative and computational methods, and has appeared in journals such as
Language Variation and Change, Annual Review of Linguistics, Language, and Linguistic Variation.
Daniel Currie Hall is an Associate Professor and coordinator of the Program in Linguistics at Saint
Mary’s University in Halifax, Nova Scotia. Before taking up his current position, he completed a PhD
at the University of Toronto in 2007 and worked as a postdoctoral researcher at the Meertens
Instituut in Amsterdam. His research deals with features and contrasts in phonology and morpho-
syntax, and has appeared in journals such as Linguistic Variation, Glossa, Nordlyd, Lingue e
linguaggio, Phonology, and the Canadian Journal of Linguistics. He is a co-editor of the journal
Phonology and of the OUP volume Contrast and Representations in Syntax.
Kathleen Currie Hall is an Associate Professor in the Department of Linguistics at the University of
British Columbia. Her research focuses on answering questions in theoretical phonology, especially
about phonological relationships, using techniques from a wide variety of areas, including experi-
mental phonetics, psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, sociolinguistics, and information theory. She
and her research team have produced two pieces of open-source software for facilitating phonological
corpus analysis: Phonological CorpusTools and Sign Language Phonetic Annotator-Analyzer.
Jeffrey Heinz is a Professor of Linguistics at Stony Brook University with an appointment in the
Institute for Advanced Computational Science. He conducts research in several related areas
including theoretical and mathematical linguistics and computational learning theory. He obtained
his PhD from UCLA and spent ten years as a professor at the University of Delaware before coming
to Stony Brook. The Linguistic Society of America recognized Heinz with its 2017 Early Career
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 17/2/2022, SPi
Award for his ‘contributions leading to a new computational science of inference and learning as
applied to language’.
Pavel Iosad is a Senior Lecturer in Linguistics and English Language at the University of Edinburgh,
Scotland. Prior to this, he trained at Moscow State University and the University of Tromsø and held
a lectureship at the University of Ulster. His primary interests are in theories of phonological
representation, phonology-morphology and phonology-phonetics interfaces, and historical phon-
ology. He works primarily on the Celtic, Germanic, and Slavic languages.
Adam Jardine is an Assistant Professor in the Rutgers University Department of Linguistics. His
research applies the theory of computation and computational learning theory to problems in
phonological theory. In particular, his work has focused on phonological tone, especially in the
Bantu languages, and how the computational properties of these patterns help us refine our theories
of how humans represent and learn phonology. He received his PhD from the University of Delaware
in 2016.
John E. Joseph is Professor of Applied Linguistics in the University of Edinburgh. His books include
Eloquence and Power (Blackwell, 1987), Limiting the Arbitrary (Benjamins, 2000), From Whitney to
Chomsky (Benjamins, 2002), Language and Identity (Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), Language and
Politics (Edinburgh University Press, 2006), Saussure (Oxford University Press, 2012), and
Language, Mind and Body: A Conceptual History (Cambridge University Press, 2018).
Michael J. Kenstowicz received his PhD in Linguistics (1971) from the University of Illinois where he
was on the faculty until 1990 when he moved to MIT. He is the author of over a hundred research
articles and two widely used phonology textbooks published in 1979 (with Charles W. Kisseberth)
and 1994. His research interests have included tone and accent, cyclic phonology, and more recently
the phonetic basis of phonological contrasts. He has studied the structure of many languages
including Balto-Slavic, Arabic, Bantu, Gur, and East Asian. He has also edited the phonology sections
of NLLT and JEAL for many years.
John Kingston earned a PhD in linguistics from the University of California, Berkeley, in 1985. He
taught in the Linguistics Department at the University of Texas, Austin, 1984‒6, and in the
Department of Modern Languages and Linguistics at Cornell University, 1986‒90. Since 1990, he
has been a member of the faculty of the Linguistics Department at the University of Massachusetts,
Amherst. His research is focused on speech perception and the relationship between phonetics and
phonology. He is also working on documenting languages which belong to the Chatino and
Chinantec families, spoken in Oaxaca, Mexico.
Paul Kiparsky, a native of Finland, received his PhD from MIT in 1965 and taught there until he
joined Stanford’s linguistics department in 1984. He is interested in how words are structured, how
the vocabulary of a language is organized, how the meaning of words determines their syntactic
properties, how language changes and is deployed in verbal art, and what all these things tell us about
the human mind.
Charles W. Kisseberth received his PhD from the University of Illinois in 1969. The most significant
themes of his thesis on Yawelmani phonology concerned the abstractness of phonology and the
problem posed by ‘conspiracies’ for the The Sound Pattern of English conception of derivations.
These themes have remained at the centre of his work for the past fifty years. In the 1970s he began to
concentrate on field work and the description of Bantu languages, with particular focus on tonology.
He began to explore Chimiini and the way that it parses sentences into phrases in 1973, and during
the past ten years has delved ever more deeply into this matter.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
current. The cotton was ruined, fit only to be plowed under to fertilize
next year’s crop. The corn was rotting on its stalks. The poor little,
unpainted, windowless frame houses were unspeakably desolate;
the walls marked to the very eaves with white mud left by the
receding waters, and everything within the homes—bedding, clothes,
furniture—wrecked and ruined, and saturated with mud. Nearly all
the live stock had perished. They showed us the stockade on a small
knoll, a little higher than the surrounding country, into which they had
driven all their animals. Here they had managed to save most of their
mules, but even at this elevation nearly all the cattle had been
drowned.
The largest land-holder in the colony, a very intelligent negro, with
a reputation for honesty and industry, had lost 16 acres of corn and
16 of cotton, 6 head of cattle and 10 hogs.
A week before, when Mr. Lykes first visited the colony after the
flood, he found the people literally starving. At one house the hungry
children were trying to eat the rotten corn. He at once secured
$50.00, through Captain Gonzales, from the South Carolina branch
of the Red Cross, with which he purchased provisions and supplies
to meet the immediate need.
The flood sufferers, who had at first seemed dazed by the
calamity, were now making efforts to rehabilitate themselves. Some
were rebuilding their chimneys and outbuildings; others had secured
work; one man had gone to work on a plantation five miles away,
walking that distance twice daily; the women and children had also
begun to pick cotton on neighboring plantations. The conditions on
this little colony illustrated the situation of the small land holder, who
has no resources except the crop, which he had hoped to harvest as
the result of his year’s labor.
The flood also had seriously crippled the larger landowners, who
could ordinarily be looked to for the relief of their poorer neighbors.
From Mr. B. S. Rawls, who has a “general store” on the bluff road
that parallels the river between Columbia and Kingsville, we learned,
that he had lost 235 acres of his own crops, and would get practically
no rent from the 2,000 acres he had rented out. Worse than this he
expected to be “out” from $1,200 to $1,500 for supplies advanced to
his tenants.
Florence, S. C.
The next point visited was Florence, Florence County, 81 miles
from Columbia. Reports of heavy flood losses had come in from the
Lynches River section. A Relief Committee had been formed by the
Honorable Hartwell Ayer, editor of the Florence Daily Times and a
small sum of money raised.
After conferring with the committee, I concluded that it would be
desirable for me to make some investigation of conditions for myself,
and went down to Cowards, which is located in the flooded district,
16 miles from Florence. Here, at the recommendation of the
committee, I called upon Mr. Z. C. Lynch, who keeps a large general
store and supplies the needs of over 200 farmers in that vicinity.
Immediately after the flood Mr. Lynch had spent three days in
riding around through the section that had been flooded, noting
carefully the conditions of the crops, and talking with the farmers. He
gave me a positive assurance that he had not met a single case of
destitution, and that, as a rule, the loss in that section would not
average more than 10% to 25% of the crop. After this frank
statement from a man who is in a far better position to get the exact
truth than I could possibly be, I decided to make no further
investigation, but to await the report of Dr. Hicks.
After spending two days in the flooded district, under
circumstances which enabled him to come into touch with
representatives from every point, Dr. Hicks returned with exactly the
same report as that given by Mr. Lynch. He said that while the losses
had been heavy, and many people were considerably crippled, there
was no destitution and there was not likely to be any that could not
easily be met by local resources.
Marion, S. C.
Proceeding to Marion on Friday night, with the expectation of
being able to complete the investigation in another 24 hours, I found
a situation which made it imperative that I should spend two or three
days in that section.
A very active and interested Relief Committee, with Mayor S. T.
Miles as chairman, was fully alive to the needs of the situation, and
had succeeded in raising a fund of over $500.00, in addition to what
had been sent by the Red Cross. I learned from this committee that
the four townships of Marion County had been practically
submerged. These townships form a tongue of land lying between
Big Peedee and Little Peedee Rivers. During the flood the water of
Big Peedee had risen and flowed clear over the intervening strip of
land until they met the water of Little Peedee. A sandy ridge
extending North and South through the interior ordinarily forms the
water shed between the two rivers, and, at many points, the water
had covered even this comparatively high land.
Arrangements were at once made for me to proceed to Eulonia,
the home of Mr. S. U. Davis, who was said to be more thoroughly
familiar with conditions in the flooded section than any one else.
After dinner Mr. Davis drove me through several miles of flooded
country. It was a matter of regret with him that I had not come a
week earlier when—nearly two weeks after the flood—the whole
country was still under water, and boats were the only available
means of transit from point to point. At that time most of the homes
were vacant, and the occupants, with their cattle and household
effects, were camping out wherever they were lucky enough to find a
spot that was “high and dry.”
Pee Dee River Flood.
Florence.
From the foregoing report of conditions in this section it will be
readily seen that no outside help is necessary at this point.
In 1868 the Russian Red Cross had 35 institutions of all kinds and
in 1906, 920.
On the first of January, 1907, the Red Cross Society of Russia
consisted of the following institutions: 1 Chief Board of
Administration; 8 Boards of District Administration; 95 local Boards of
Administration; 509 local Red Cross Committees; 40 Committees of
communities of Red Cross nurses; 60 communities of Red Cross
nurses; 90 ambulatory clinics; 6 emergency hospitals; 5 asylums for
former Red Cross nurses; 1 asylum for invalids; 9 asylums for
crippled soldiers; 1 asylum for soldiers’ widows; 3 asylums and 3
sanitariums for children of disabled soldiers; 7 convalescent houses;
1 maternity hospital.
Red Cross Hospital Ship.
BY E. S. MARTIN.