Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full download The scientific sublime : popular science unravels the mysteries of the universe Alan G. Gross file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download The scientific sublime : popular science unravels the mysteries of the universe Alan G. Gross file pdf all chapter on 2024
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-democratic-sublime-on-
aesthetics-and-popular-assembly-jason-frank/
https://ebookmass.com/product/contemporary-scientific-realism-
the-challenge-from-the-history-of-science-timothy-d-lyons/
https://ebookmass.com/product/energy-and-power-germany-in-the-
age-of-oil-atoms-and-climate-change-stephen-g-gross/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-special-liveliness-of-hooks-in-
popular-music-and-beyond-steven-g-smith/
Logical Empiricism as Scientific Philosophy Alan
Richardson
https://ebookmass.com/product/logical-empiricism-as-scientific-
philosophy-alan-richardson/
https://ebookmass.com/product/causation-in-science-and-the-
methods-of-scientific-discovery-rani-lill-anjum/
https://ebookmass.com/product/energy-and-power-germany-in-the-
age-of-oil-atoms-and-climate-change-6th-edition-stephen-g-gross/
https://ebookmass.com/product/science-without-god-rethinking-the-
history-of-scientific-naturalism-first-edition-edition-harrison/
https://ebookmass.com/product/statistics-the-art-and-science-of-
learning-from-data-5th-edition-alan-agresti/
The Scientific Sublime
The Scientific Sublime
Popular Science Unravels the
Mysteries of the Universe
Alan G. Gross
1
1
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers
the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education
by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University
Press in the UK and certain other countries.
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Printed by Sheridan Books, Inc., United States of America
For Bradley Benson and Aleksandr Lazaryan
Two extraordinary and caring physicians
CONTENTS
Acknowledgments ix
Notes 285
Index 311
viii | Contents
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I am the author of this book; my name appears alone on the title page. But
if you are lucky—and I was lucky—you are a member of a team dedi-
cated to your assistance. For their insightful efforts at improving my draft
I would like to thank Randy Allen Harris and the two other reviewers who,
regretfully, chose to remain anonymous. Nothing can adequately repay
this gift of constructive criticism. I would also like to thank the ten authors
I have chosen as my subject. One of my pre-publication reviewers was
kind enough to say that my chapters read like pieces in the New Yorker.
However true this may be, one fact must be noted: it is impossible for
one’s sentences not to improve when writing in the shadow of these mas-
ters and mistresses of English prose.
I would also thank my editor Hallie Stebbins for her continued sup-
port and my former editor, Peter Ohlin, who referred me to her. I would
like also to pay tribute to Arthur Fine and to remember David Hull, who
together taught a middle-aged man philosophy of science, and the late
Joseph Williams, who taught me how to write. Last but not least, I would
like to thank my long-time co-author, Joseph Harmon, who started this
project with me, helped it along manfully, but decided in the end to bow
out. I shall miss him; I miss him already.
It goes without saying that I alone am responsible for any errors in fact
or in judgment.
The Scientific Sublime
CHAPTER 1 Isn’t Science Sublime?
For over a half century, popular science books have been embraced enthu-
siastically by the welcoming public, from Richard Dawkins on evolution
to Brian Greene on string theory. But while shelf upon shelf of books
of popular science exist, only one book exists on these books, Elizabeth
Leane’s Reading Popular Physics.3 Perhaps that’s because no other book
is needed; perhaps there is no more mystery to solve, no conundrum to
unravel. Take A Brief History of Time: it is selling far better than Gone
with the Wind, apparently with good reason: it is a better read. A reviewer
on Amazon opines: “Stephen Hawking is an established scientific gen-
ius, but this book establishes him as a brilliant writer—an extremely rare,
yet valuable combination.” A blog critic pronounces his verdict: “A Brief
History of Time is far more than a science book. It’s one of the renaissance
books that is so seminal to the notion of who we are, and where we might
be in the next 50 years, that it should be required reading for every person
from high school on. If that seems like a big ask you’ve got the wrong
idea about this book. It’s light and easy and fun, full of subtle humor and
provocative notions.”4 These are views about a book chock-full of abstruse
ideas strenuously avoided in their school years by all but future physicists.
The universal attraction of such books is the mystery I would like to solve,
the conundrum I would like to unravel.
Jon Turney, a scholar of popular science and former editor of Penguin
Books, questions whether such a book can be written: “At some point,” he
says, “one must ask if it is possible . . . to consider the whole ensemble of
books. I have my doubts. Even books on the same topic, quantum physics
say, are tremendously diverse, in style, level, approach, and in which genres
they draw on.”5 Turney is not totally despairing of success; he suggests that
potential authors see popular science books as symptoms of larger forces in
our culture. I intend to act on Turney’s suggestion. I acknowledge the diver-
sity of style, level, and approach that Turney sees as an obstacle to a compre-
hensive account. But I attribute this diversity not to a difference in goals but to
differing literary talents and to different takes on what science is and what it
can accomplish. However different their skills and their subject matter, these
writers are in the business of generating in their readers a sense of wonder at
a nature whose workings science, and only science, can comprehend.
To create this transcendental effect, this sense of emotional and intellec-
tual uplift, these writers rely on a form of experience well established in the
West: the sublime. We experience the sublime in literature when we read
John Milton’s sonnet on his blindness; we experience it in nature when
we visit the Grand Canyon; we experience it in science when we real-
ize that one short equation—e = mc2—led to Hiroshima and Fukushima.
Turney agrees that “science writers evoke their most telling effects by
evoking the sublime”6; however, he reserves this effect for the heightened
prose of isolated passages. This limitation also characterizes Marjorie
Hope Nicolson’s pioneering classic, Mountain Gloom and Glory: The
Development of the Aesthetics of the Infinite.7 For her, the sublime is an
aspect of Romantic poetry, of the Romantic vision of the world. I differ
from Turney and Nicholson in generalizing the sublime to whole works.
I contend that heightened passages in the works of popular science I have
chosen are outward signs of the sublimity that inheres in their structure, a
spirit that informs their every aspect.
My views are not without distinguished predecessors. In Victorian
Sensation, James Secord explores the impact on its many readers of Robert
beginning with the depths of space and the regions of the remotest nebulae,
we will gradually descend through the starry zone to which our solar system
belongs, to our own terrestrial spheroid, circled by air and ocean, there to
direct our attention to its form, temperature, and magnetic tension, and to
consider the fullness of organic life unfolding itself upon its surface beneath
the vivifying influence of light.11
The sublime takes its first step toward cultural immortality in an essay
written around the first or second century of our era and attributed, in
all probability misattributed, to Longinus. On the Sublime observes that
sublimity in poetry or prose “consists in a consummate excellence and
distinction of language.”16 These works do not “persuade the audience
but . . . transport them out of themselves,”17 by drawing their attention
away “from reasoning to the enthralling effect of the imagination.”18 Such
works lift them “near the mighty mind of God.”19
On the Sublime mysteriously disappears for over fourteen hundred
years, only to resurface two-thirds intact, published in Basel in 1554. By
the end of the 18th century, a steady stream of Greek editions and Latin
translations follows. 20 Although turned into English as early as 1652, it is
not until 1704, in John Dennis’s The Grounds of Criticism in Poetry that
The Sublime finds its way into English literary criticism. Dennis defines
the sublime as “nothing else but a great thought, or great thoughts moving
the soul from its ordinary situation by the enthusiasm that naturally attends
them.”21 It is literature not life that creates this effect:
For the spirits being set in a violent emotion, and the imagination being fired
by that agitation; and the brain being deeply penetrated by those impres-
sions, the very objects themselves are set as it were before us, and conse-
quently we are sensible of the same passion that we should feel from the
things themselves. For the warmer the imagination is, the less able we are to
reflect, and consequently the things are the more present to us of which we
draw the images; and therefore where the imagination is so inflamed as to
render the soul utterly incapable of reflecting, there is no difference between
the images and the things themselves.22
Dennis shares with his fellow Britons Joseph Addison, John Baillie,
Joseph Priestley, and Hugh Blair the view that the literary sublime applies
Longinus tells us why this passage elicits awe. It is Homer’s lofty language
combined with a conceptual grandeur: “The earth is split to its founda-
tions, hell itself laid bare, the whole universe sundered and turned upside
down; and meanwhile everything, heaven and hell, mortal and immoral
alike, shares in the conflict and dangers of that battle.”24 Inspired by this
inspired analysis, the young Edward Gibbon, not yet the great historian of
ancient Rome, says that its author “tells me his own feelings upon reading
it; and tells them with such energy, that he communicates them. I almost
doubt which is most sublime, Homer’s Battle of the Gods or Longinus’s
apostrophe . . . upon it.”25
The restriction to isolated passages is not long honored. Even Hugh
Blair admits that “some, indeed there are, who, by a strength and dignity in
their conceptions, and a current of high ideas that runs through their whole
composition, preserve the reader’s mind always in a tone nearly allied to
the sublime; for which reason they may, in a limited sense, merit the name
of continued sublime writers.”26 And Gibbon notices that there was no
reason to hesitate on Longinus’s account. Longinus thinks of the whole of
It is by some natural instinct that we admire, surely not small streams, clear
and useful as they are, but the Nile, the Danube, the Rhine, and far above
all, the sea. The little fire we kindle for ourselves keeps clear and steady, yet
we do not therefore regard it with more amazement than the fires of Heaven,
which are often darkened, or think it more wonderful than the craters of
Etna in eruption, hurling up rocks and whole hills from their depths and
sometimes shooting forth rivers of that pure Titanic fire. But on all such
matters I would say only this . . . it is always the unusual which wins our
wonder.33
If the pain and terror are so modified as not to be actually noxious; if the
pain is not carried to violence, and the terror is not conversant about the
present destruction of the person, as these emotions clear the parts, whether
fine or gross, of a dangerous and troublesome encumbrance, they are capa-
ble of producing delight; not pleasure, but a sort of delightful horror, a sort
of tranquility tinged with terror; which, as it belongs to self-preservation, is
one of the strongest of all the passions. Its object is the sublime. Its highest
degree I call astonishment; the subordinate degrees are awe, reverence, and
respect, which, by the very etymology of the words, show from what source
they are derived, and how they stand distinguished from positive pleasure.34
Illustrator: H. C. Edwards
Language: English