Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tutorial-09 Multi-cell Beams (1)
Tutorial-09 Multi-cell Beams (1)
The idealised cross-section of a two-cell thin-wall wing box is shown below. The wing supports forces
and moments as shown. Assume that the webs do not buckle and carry shear only, and that the shear
modulus is 28 GPa.
Calculate and sketch the shear flow distribution under the applied load
24500 N 20000 N
5
11000 N 6 7,000,000
4
N mm
254 I II 202 406
3
1
2
distances in mm
635 763
Wall Length (mm) Thickness (mm) Boom Area (mm2)
1-6 254 1.625 1, 6 1290
2-5 406 2.032 2, 5 1936
3-4 202 1.220 3, 4 645
1-2 647 0.915
5-6 647 0.915 Cell Area (mm2)
2-3 775 0.559 I 232,000
4-5 775 0.559 II 258,000
It can be useful to determine cross-section properties in a tabular manner. In addition, this example uses
exact values as calculated in a spreadsheet. It is recommended to solve using a spreadsheet.
where
x* and y* are coordinates relative to an arbitrary location (here the mid-point of 1-6)
𝑥̄ 𝛴𝐴𝑥 ∗ /𝛴𝐴 550.5 mm, 𝑦̄ 𝛴𝐴𝑦 ∗ /𝛴𝐴 0,
𝑥 𝑥∗ 𝑥̄ , 𝑦 𝑦∗ 𝑦̄ , 𝐴𝑥 𝐴 𝑥 , 𝐴𝑦 𝐴 𝑦 , 𝐴𝑥𝑦 𝐴 𝑥 𝑦
𝐼 𝛴𝐴𝑦 214,333,358 mm , 𝐼 𝛴𝐴𝑥 1,736,967,252 mm , 𝐼 𝛴𝐴𝑥𝑦 0
Page 1 of 4
Sx = sum of all x direction forces = -11000 N (-ve as in -ve x direction, i.e. to the left)
Sy = sum of all y direction forces = 24500 + 20000 = 44500 N (+ve as in +ve y direction, i.e. up)
Cut at 6-5 and 5-4, and solve in from “free” edges at 6, 5 and 4
𝑆 𝐼 𝑆 𝐼 𝑆 𝐼 𝑆 𝐼 1 3
𝑞 𝐴 𝑥 𝐴 𝑦 𝑞
𝐼 𝐼 𝐼 𝐼 𝐼 𝐼 2
𝑞 6.34 10 𝐴 𝑥 2.08 10 𝐴 𝑦 𝑞 𝐴 6.34 10 𝑥 2.08 10 𝑦 𝑞
As a check, it is possible to calculate q23,b from boom 2, by adding in the shear flows from panels 1-2 and
5-2 as a combined q0 term (in general, if +ve directions of shear flow point in to the same junction then
they add together).
sketching qb is useful at this point (keep arrows in +ve direction at this point)
Useful also to sketch unknowns qc,I and qc,I (closing qc in each cell, assume +ve anti-clockwise)
qb (N/mm) qc
6 4 6 4
5 5
1 3 1 3
-9.0 2 6.9 2
Page 2 of 4
Create a d/dz equation for each cell, assume anti-clockwise positive
I: 𝑞 , 2 𝑞 , 38.5 9.0
, , . . . . . .
80.6
.
Take moments about boom 5, anti-clockwise +ve, remembering to add in moments from 2 vertical
forces, 1 horizontal force and the clockwise moment (note the moment is simply added in regardless of
the moment centre as it results in the same shear flow system regardless of its moment centre)
Also note that the enclosed area created by panel 1-2 and boom 5 and the enclosed area created by
panel 2-3 and boom 5 are calculated from geometry and equal to 140,130 mm2 and 167,913 mm2. This
is shown below (triangle 1-2-5-1 + enclosed area 1-2-1 and triangle 5-2-3-5 + enclosed area 3-2-3).
At this point, it’s worth to recall that Eq. (3) should be the same regardless of the point that moments are
taken about. This means that the term found from putting all known terms on the same side of the
equation (i.e. torque from external subtracted by torque from qb terms, Text – Tqb, which here would be
–8133500 – (–9509628) = 1376128) is always the same. So, we can take moments about another point
as a check that this term is correct.
Taking moments about boom 2, anti-clockwise +ve, and noting that the enclosed area created by panel
1-2 and boom 2 is calculated as half the area found from subtracting the enclosed area of cell I from the
trapezium formed by panels 1-6 and 2-5 (and likewise for cell II):
And checking the sum of known terms, Text – Tqb = –3667500 – (–5043628) = 1376128 as before
trapezium 5 trapezium
6-1-2-5-6 = 5-2-3-4-5 =
209550 mm2
6 4 231952 mm2
triangle triangle
1-2-5-1 5-2-3-5
= 128905 mm2 = 154889 mm2
3.7 6.0
12.7 0.9
Discuss the results
How would the calculation change if the cross-section was not symmetric?
Is the cross-section undergoing torsion? Is it rotating? If so, which way? If not, why not?
If you have used a spreadsheet, then try exploring how changing the load values changes the shear
flows, e.g. try having only single forces or moments in isolation, reverse signs, change magnitude, etc.
Response
How would the calculation change if the cross-section was not symmetric?
- basically as above, where the full equation for q is needed (but cannot be simplified as Ixy 0), which
adds q terms and affects the torsional equivalence.
Is the cross-section undergoing torsion? Is it rotating? If so, which way? If not, why not?
- Yes, there is torsion. This can be seen from the non-zero rate of twist. As the rate of twist is negative,
this means the cross-section is rotating clockwise (as anti-clockwise was the assumed positive direction
for rotation). (for reference, the shear centre is 88.6 mm to the left of web 2-5 on the axis of symmetry).
Page 4 of 4