Client : STEEL WORKS OF THE Date : SEP-20

CAROLINAS Calc. by : PKS

Project : The New Forrester Center for C'ked by : KVP
Behavioral Health Revision : 00
Job No :

(Connection at intersection of grid line Q & grid line 1

CONNECTION :- C006 at Roof framing plan, Refer drawing S2.2)
(Code:- ASD 15th Edition)

LOADS :- Vertical shear

Beam  "W16x31" V1  50kip (50% UDL) (MAX)

V  32kip (Connection capacity)

(E.O.R to Verify)

1
2"
HSS5X5X5/16

W16X31 (MIN)

HSS5X5X5/16
A A
1"
143"

)
3"

AX

5/16
(M

11
2"
2"

3" 1/2(3/8)
3"

31

11
X

2"
16
W
1"
14

PROVIDE 1/4"(MAX) SHIM

(IF REQUIRED)
1/2" THK SHEAR PLATE
(13/16''X1'' SSL HOLES) VIEW A-A
45°

Notes :-

All bolts are 3/4" dia, grade A325-N Type,

All bolt holes are STD in main members and SSL holes (13/16"x1") in shear plate.

Weld electrode is E70XX.

WF shapes are grade A992, connection plates are A36 and HSS are A500 grade C.
 Client : STEEL WORKS OF THE Date : SEP-20
CAROLINAS Calc. by : PKS
Project : The New Forrester Center for C'ked by : KVP
Behavioral Health Revision : 00
Job No :

Section properties :-
Column  "HSS5X5X5/16"
2
dc  5  in bc  5  in tc  0.313  in tcdes  0.291  in Abc  5.26  in
Beam  "W16x31"
2
db  15.9  in bfb  5.53  in tfb  0.44  in twb  0.275  in k b  1.125  in k 1b  0.75  in Abs  9.13  in

Material properties :-
Yield strength of A992 material Fym  50ksi UItimate strength of A992 material Fum  65ksi

Yield strength of A36 material Fyc  36ksi UItimate strength of A36 material Fuc  58ksi

Yield strength of A500-C material Fyh  50ksi UItimate strength of A500-C material Fuh  62ksi

Design strength of weld FEXX  70ksi Nominal shear strength of A325 bolt Fnv  54ksi

Bolt properties :-
Bolt diameter d  0.75in

Bolt grade (A325 or A490) BGr  "A325"

Connection type (N or SC or X)& class Type  "N"

Hole type ( @ member) Hole  "STD"

Hole type ( @ shear plate) Hole1  "SSL"

Edge distance (vertical) ev  1.25  in

Edge distance (horizontal) eh  1.5  in

End clearance ecl  0.5in

Diameter of hole Dh  0.8125  in

Slot length Dh1  1  in

2
π d 2
Area of bolt Abolt  Abolt  0.442  in
4

Shear capacity of bolt Scap  0.5  Fnv  Abolt Scap  11.93  kip

Thickness of the shear plate ts  0.5in

Check for bolts :-

Number of bolt rows nr  4

Number of bolt columns nc  2

Total number of bolts n  nr  nc n8

Bolt gage g  3in if nc = 2 g  3  in

0in if nc = 1
 Client : STEEL WORKS OF THE Date : SEP-20
CAROLINAS Calc. by : PKS
Project : The New Forrester Center for C'ked by : KVP
Behavioral Health Revision : 00
Job No :

Bolt spacing S  3in

nc  1  g  Dh1  d  1in

Eccentricity b/w the C.G of bolt group ez  ecl  eh  ez  4.625  in
and the face of column web 2 2
(Conservatively)
Coefficient Cz  4.435

Shear capacity Fs  Cz  Scap Fs  52.9  kip

F.s(52.9 kip) > V(32 kip): Therefore O.K.

Check for bearing / tearing capacity of beam web :-

Bearing out at extreme bolt T1  1.2  d  twb Fum T1  16.09  kip

Bearing / tearing at intermediate bolt

  
T2  min 1.2  d  twb  Fum 0.6  S  Dh  twb  Fum
 T2  16.09  kip
Cz
Bearing / tearing capacity     
Ra  nc min T1 Scap  nr  1 min T2 Scap  
  n  Ra  52.9  kip

R.a(52.9 kip) > V(32 kip): Therefore O.K.

Check for bearing / tearing capacity of shear plate :-

  Dh  
Bearing / tearing at extreme bolt T1  min 1.2  d  ts  Fuc 0.6   ev    ts  Fuc T1  14.681  kip
  2  

  
Bearing / tearing at intermediate bolt T2  min 1.2  d  ts  Fuc 0.6  S  Dh  ts  Fuc
 T2  26.1  kip
Cz
Bearing / tearing capacity     
Ra  nc min T1 Scap  nr  1 min T2 Scap  
  n  Ra  52.9  kip

R.a(52.9 kip) > V(32 kip): Therefore O.K.

Check for shear capacity of the Incoming beam web :-

2
Gross shear area Ags  db  twb Ags  4.37  in

Net area

Ans  Ags  nr Dh 
1 
in  t Ans  3.41  in
2
 16  wb

Shear capacity 
Fcap  min 0.4  Ags  Fym 0.3  Ans  Fum  Fcap  66.49  kip

F.cap(66.5 kip) > V(32 kip): Therefore O.K.

Check for shear capacity of the shear plate :-

 nr  1  S  2  ev  ts
2
Gross shear area Asp  Asp  5.75  in

 1  2
Net shear area Ansp  Asp  nr Dh  in  t Ansp  4  in
 16  s

Shear capacity 
Fcap  min 0.4  Asp  Fyc 0.3Ansp  Fuc  Fcap  69.6  kip

F.cap(69.6 kip) > V(32 kip): Therefore O.K.

 Client : STEEL WORKS OF THE Date : SEP-20
CAROLINAS Calc. by : PKS
Project : The New Forrester Center for C'ked by : KVP
Behavioral Health Revision : 00
Job No :

Check for block shear capacity of shear plate :-

 nr  1  S  ev  ts
2
Gross shear area Agv  Agv  5.125  in

 1 
Net shear area 
Anv  Agv  nr  0.5  Dh 


in  t
16  s
Anv  3.594  in
2

 n  1  g  e  n  0.5  D  1 in  t
 c  h  c  h1 16  s 2
Net tension area Ant  Ant  1.45  in

Ubs  0.5 (Reduction coefficient) (Refer J.4.3 AISC 15th Ed)

Block shear capacity  

Bcap  min 0.3  Agv  Fyc 0.3Anv  Fuc  0.5  Ubs  Ant  Fuc Bcap  76.42  kip

B.cap(76.42 kip) > V(32 kip): Therefore O.K.

Check for combined flexural and shear stress of shear plate (Gross) :-

Dh1  d
Eccentricity between first column of ec  ecl  eh   1in ec  3.125  in
bolt and connection interface 2

Clear depth of shear plate  

Dp  nr  1 S  2  ev Dp  11.5  in
2
Gross shear area Agv  Dp  ts Agv  5.75  in

Shear capacity of plate Vc1  0.4  Agv  Fyc Vc1  82.8  kip

 D 2  t 
p s 3
Plastic section modulus Zmod    Zmod  16.53  in
 4 

Moment capacity of plate Mcap1  0.6  Zmod  Fyc Mcap1  357.07  kip  in

2  V e  2
 V 

c 
Ratio of combined stress on plate R    R  0.228

 Vc1   Mcap1 
R(0.228) <1:Therefore O.K.

Check for combined flexural and shear stress of shear plate ( Net ) :-
  1  2
Net Shear area Anv  Dp  nr Dh  in  t Anv  4  in
  16  s

Net shear capacity of shear plate Vc2  0.3Anv  Fuc Vc2  69.6  kip

 2  1   1  
2

ts  Dp   Dh   2 
in  S  nr  1   Dh  in 
  16     16   3
Net Plastic modulus of Zodd  Zodd  11.51  in
shear plate for odd bolt 4
rows
 D 2   D  1 in  S  n 2
 p  h 16  r 
 
Zeven  ts    3
Net Plastic modulus of Zeven  11.28  in
shear plate for even bolt  4 
rows

c  mod nr 2  c0
 Client : STEEL WORKS OF THE Date : SEP-20
CAROLINAS Calc. by : PKS
Project : The New Forrester Center for C'ked by : KVP
Behavioral Health Revision : 00
Job No :

3
Net Plastic modulus of Znet  Zodd if c = 1 Znet  11.28  in
the shear plate
Zeven if c = 0

Moment capacity of shear plate Mcap2  0.5Znet  Fuc Mcap2  327.16  kip  in

2  V e  2
 V 

c 
Ratio of combined stress on plate R1    R1  0.305
 Mcap2 
 Vc2 
R.1(0.305) <1:Therefore O.K.

Check for buckling capacity of shear plate :-

Induced moment due to vertical shear Mv  V  ec Mv  100  kip  in

2
Dp  ts
3
Elastic section modulus Smod  Smod  11.02  in
6
2
Dp  ts
3
Plastic section modulus Z1  Z1  16.531  in
4
 db   nr  1 S 
First bolt distance dct  max  3in dct  3.45  in
 2 
  ec    dct 
Cb1   3  ln  1  Cb1  1.188
  Dp    Dp 

Lateral torsional buckling modification factor Cb  Cb1 if Cb1  1.84 Cb  1.84

1.84 otherwise
Young's modulus Es  29000 ksi

1.9  Es  Cb
Critical buckling stress Fcr  Fcr  705.28  ksi
 ec  Dp 
 
 t 2 
 s 
Plastic bending momemnt Mp  Fyc  Z1 Mp  595.12  kip  in
Yielding of the plate
 ec  Dp   0.08  Es 
Mn  
0.6  min Mp 1.6  Fyc  Smod   2    F 
if
 ts  
yc 

   ec  Dp  Fyc   0.08  Es   ec  Dp   1.9  Es 

0.6 min Cb  1.52  0.274        Fyc  Smod Mp if   
   t 2  Es    Fyc   t 2   Fyc 
   s     s 
 ec  Dp   1.9  Es 
0.6 min  Fcr  Smod Mp if   Mn  357.07  kip  in
 t 2   Fyc 
 s 
M.n(357.08 kip-in) > M.v(100 kip-in): Therefore O.K.
 Client : STEEL WORKS OF THE Date : SEP-20
CAROLINAS Calc. by : PKS
Project : The New Forrester Center for C'ked by : KVP
Behavioral Health Revision : 00
Job No :

Check for weld b/w shear plate and column :-

Length of the weld  
Lw  nr  1  S  2  ev Lw  11.5  in

V kip
Shear per inch on weld FL  FL  2.783 
Lw in

 FL 
Size of weld W   0.125in W  0.32  in
 min  0.3  FEXX 0.4  Fyc 0.3  Fuc 

Adopt 1/2" PJP weld with 5/16" Fillet weld

Check for thickness of shear plate :-
Clear depth of shear plate  
Dp  nr  1 S  2  ev Dp  11.5  in

Coefficient C1  26.031  in

Moment strength of bolt group Mmax1  1.11  Fnv  Abolt  C1 Mmax1  57.44  kip  ft

tpl  
min t wb ts  if nc = 1  eh  2d tpl  0.5  in

ts if nc  2

 d  1 in if n = 1  e  2d
Maximum thickness of plate Tpmax    c h Tpmax  0.869  in
 2 16 
6Mmax1
if nc  2
2
Fyc  Dp

T.pmax(0.869 in) > t.s(0.5 in): Therefore O.K.

Check for lateral torsional buckling capacity of shear plate :-

Ωb  1.67 Ωv  1.5
3
Available strength to resist 1 Dp  ts
Rn   1500  π   ksi Rn  415.37  kip
the lateral displacement Ωb 2
ec
R.n(415.37 kip) > V(32 kip): Therefore O.K.

Maximum thickness of tshim  0.25in

shim plate

 twb ts 
Eccentricity ec1    tshim   ec1  0.638  in
 2 2

Moment induced due to eccentricity Mta  V  ec1 Mta  20.4  kip  in

2
 0.6  Fym V  Dp  ts
Moment capacity Mcap    Mcap  20.75  kip  in
 Ωv Dp  ts  2
(For Non Composite beam) 
Mcap(20.75 kip-in) > M.ta(20.4 kip-in): Therefore O.K.
 Client : STEEL WORKS OF THE Date : SEP-20
CAROLINAS Calc. by : PKS
Project : The New Forrester Center for C'ked by : KVP
Behavioral Health Revision : 00
Job No :

Check for HSS punching shear :-

Ω  2
Length of shear plate Dp  Lw Dp  11.5  in

Eccentricity between CG of bolt ez  4.625  in

group and connection interface
Induced moment due to eccentricity M  V  ez M  12.33  kip  ft
2
Fuh  tcdes  Dp
Moment capacity of HSS section Mcap1  Mcap1  19.88  kip  ft
5Ω
M.cap1 (19.88 kip-ft) > M(12.33 kip-ft): Therefore O.K.

Check for HSS Wall slenderness under shear loading :-

 
max dc bc  3  tcdes
Width and thick ratio s  s  14.182
tcdes

Es
Slenderness ratio of HSS a  1.40  a  33.72
Fyh
a(33.72) > s(14.18): Therefore O.K.

Check for HSS Wall slenderness:-

 dc bc 
Slenderness ratio a  max    a  17.18
 tcdes tcdes 
a(17.18 ) < 40: Therefore O.K.

End of calculation.