Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 11

Rev0a

Client : STEEL WORKS OF THE CAROLINAS Date : SEP-20


Project : The New Forrester Center for Calc by : ANP
Behavioral Health Chekd by : KVP
Job No : Revision : 00
Calc no : C004 / 1

CONNECTION:- C004 (Connection along grid line "R" & at grid line "30"
in 1st Floor Framing Plan, Refer dwg S2.0.)
(Code : ASD 15th Edition)

LOADS :- Vertical Shear Major axis moment


Beam  "W16x31" V  25kip (50% UDL) M  24kip  ft (Connection
capacity)
(E.O.R to Verify)

(CJP) 0'-4 1/2"X3/8" THK FLANGE PLATE


(TYP)

0'-7" (MIN) (3 SIDES)


1/4
141"
141"

3/8" THK SHEAR PLATE


1"
14

(13/16"X1" SSL HOLES)


3"
HSS5X5X5/16

1
2"
3"

1"
12 1"
12
3"
1"
14

1/4 (TYP)
1/4 1/4

0'-7" (MIN) W16X31 W16X31

1/4 0'-6 1/2"X3/8" THK FLANGE PLATE


1/4
A VIEW A-A

SHOP DRAWING NOTE:


STRONG AXIS MOMENT CAPACITY = 24kip-ft (E.O.R TO VERIFY)

NOTES:-

All bolts are 3/4" dia, grade A325 N type.

All bolt holes are STD in main members and SSL holes (13/16"X1") in shear plate.

Weld electrode E70XX.

All WF steel is grade A992, connection material is A36, HSS are A500 grade C.
Client : STEEL WORKS OF THE CAROLINAS Date : SEP-20
Project : The New Forrester Center for Calc by : ANP
Behavioral Health Chekd by : KVP
Job No : Revision : 00
Calc no : C004 / 2

Section properties :-
Column  "HSS5X5X5/16"
2
dc  5  in bc  5  in tc  0.313  in tcdes  0.291  in Ac  5.26  in
Beam  "W16x31"
db1  15.9  in bfb1  5.53  in tfb1  0.44  in twb1  0.275  in k b1  1.125  in k 1b1  0.75  in

Material properties:-
Yield strength of A992 material Fym  50ksi UItimate strength of A992 material Fum  65ksi

Yield strength of A500 grade C material Fyh  50ksi UItimate strength of A500 grade C material Fuh  62ksi

Yield strength of A36 material Fyc  36ksi UItimate strength of A36 material Fuc  58ksi

Design strength of weld FEXX  70ksi Nominal shear strength of A325 bolt Fnv  54ksi

Bolt properties :-
Bolt diameter d  0.75in
Bolt grade (A325 or A490) BGr  "A325"

Connection type (N, X or SC) & Class Type  "N"


Hole type (STD or SSL) Hole  "STD" (in main members)
Hole type (STD or SSL) Hole1  "SSL" (in shear plate)
Thickness of shear plate ts  0.375in

Bolt spacing S  3in

Edge distance (vertical) ev  1.25in

Edge distance (Horizontal) eh  1.5in


2
π d 2
Area of bolt Ab  Ab  0.442  in
4
Shear capacity of bolt Scap  0.5Fnv  Ab Scap  11.93  kip

1
Diameter of hole Dh  d  in Dh  0.8125  in
16
Diameter of hole (Horizontal slot) Dh1  1in

End clearance ecl  0.5in


Check for bolts:-
Number of bolt rows nr  4

Number of bolt column nc  1

Total number of bolts n  nr  nc n4


Dh1  d
Eccentricity b/w bolt group C.G. and e1  ecl  eh  e1  2.125  in
force acting point 2
Client : STEEL WORKS OF THE CAROLINAS Date : SEP-20
Project : The New Forrester Center for Calc by : ANP
Behavioral Health Chekd by : KVP
Job No : Revision : 00
Calc no : C004 / 3

C  3.257

Shear capacity of the bolt group Fbg  C  Scap Fbg  38.85  kip

F.bg(38.85 kip) > V(25 kip): Therefore O.K.

Check for shear capacity of shear plate :-

 nr  1  S  2ev  ts
2
Gross shear area Ag  Ag  4.312  in

 1  2
Net shear area An  Ag  nr Dh  in  t An  3  in
 16  s

Shear capacity 
Fcap  min 0.3An  Fuc 0.4  Ag  Fyc  Fcap  52.2  kip

F.cap(52.2 kip) > V(25 kip): Therefore O.K.

Check for shear capacity of beam web :-

Top cope depth dct  1.25in

Gross shear area 


Ag  db1  dct  twb1  Ag  4.029  in
2

 1  2
Net shear area An  Ag  nr Dh  in  t An  3.066  in
 16  wb1

Shear capacity 
Fcap  min 0.3An  Fum 0.4  Ag  Fym  Fcap  59.79  kip

F.cap(59.79 kip) > V(25 kip): Therefore O.K.

Check for bearing/tearing capacity of shear plate:-

  Dh  
Bearing / tearing capacity at extreme bolt T1  min 1.2  d  ts  Fuc 0.6   ev    ts  Fuc T1  11.011  kip
  2  
Bearing / tearing capacity at
intermediate bolt
  
T2  min 1.2  d  ts  Fuc 0.6  S  Dh  ts  Fuc
 T2  19.57  kip

C
Bearing / tearing capacity     
Ra  nc min T1 Scap  nr  1 min T2 Scap  
  n  Ra  38.1  kip

R.a(38.1 kip) > V(25 kip): Therefore O.K.

Check for bearing/tearing capacity of beam web :-


Bearing capacity at extreme bolt T1  1.2  d  twb1  Fum T1  16.087  kip

Bearing / tearing capacity at


intermediate bolt
  
T2  min 1.2  d  twb1  Fum 0.6  S  Dh  twb1  Fum
 T1  16.09  kip

C
Bearing / tearing capacity of beam web     
Ra  nc min T1 Scap  nr  1 min T2 Scap  
  n  Ra  38.85  kip

R.a(38.85 kip) > V(25 kip): Therefore O.K.

Check for block shear capacity of shear plate :-

 nr  1  S  ev  ts
2
Gross shear area Agv  Agv  3.844  in
Client : STEEL WORKS OF THE CAROLINAS Date : SEP-20
Project : The New Forrester Center for Calc by : ANP
Behavioral Health Chekd by : KVP
Job No : Revision : 00
Calc no : C004 / 4

 n  0.5  D  1 in  t 
 r  h 16  s 2
Net shear area Anv  Agv  Anv  2.695  in

  1 
Net Tension area


Ant  eh  nc  0.5  Dh1 

 in  t
16  s
Ant  0.363  in
2

Ubs  1 (Reduction Coefficient ) (Refer J4.3 AISC 15th Ed)

Block shear capacity  


Bcap  min 0.3Agv  Fyc 0.3Anv  Fuc  Ubs  0.5  Ant  Fuc Bcap  52.05  kip

B.cap(52.05 kip) > V(25 kip): Therefore O.K.

Check for block shear capacity of beam web :- (Conservatively)

 nr  1  S  ev  twb1


2
Gross shear area Agv  Agv  2.819  in

 n  0.5  D  1 in  t 
 r  h 16  wb1 2
Net shear area Anv  Agv  Anv  1.977  in

  1 
Net Tension area


Ant  eh  nc  0.5  Dh 

 in  t
16  wb1
Ant  0.292  in
2

Ubs  1 (Reduction Coefficient ) (Refer J4.3 AISC 15th Ed)

Block shear capacity  


Bcap  min 0.3Agv  Fym 0.3Anv  Fum  Ubs  0.5  Ant  Fum Bcap  48.04  kip

B.cap(48.04 kip) > V(25 kip): Therefore O.K.

Check for combined flexural and shear stress of shear plate ( Gross ) :-
Dh1  d
Eccentricity between first column of e1  ecl  eh  e1  2.125  in
bolt and connection interface 2

Induced moment on shear plate Ms  V  e1 Ms  53.13  kip  in

Clear depth of shear plate  


Dp  nr  1  S  2ev Dp  11.5  in
2
Gross shear area Agv  Dp  ts Agv  4.312  in

2
Dp  ts
Moment capacity of plate Mc  0.6   Fyc Mc  267.81  kip  in
4

Shear capacity of plate Vc  0.4  Agv  Fyc Vc  62.1  kip

2 M  2
 V 

s
Ratio of combined flexural and shear R1    R1  0.201

stress on plate  Vc   Mc 
1 > R.1(0.201): Therefore O.K.

Check for combined flexural and shear stress of shear plate ( Net ) :-
 n  1  S  2e   1 
 r 
2
Net Shear area Anv  v nr Dh  in  t Anv  3  in
  16  s
Client : STEEL WORKS OF THE CAROLINAS Date : SEP-20
Project : The New Forrester Center for Calc by : ANP
Behavioral Health Chekd by : KVP
Job No : Revision : 00
Calc no : C004 / 5

 2 
ts  Dp   Dh 
1  2
in  S  nr 
  16   3
Zneteve  Zneteve  8.461  in
4
 2  1   1 
2
in  S   nr  1   Dh 
2
ts  Dp   Dh  in 
  16     16   3
Znetodd  Znetodd  8.635  in
4


c  mod nr 2 
3
Net plastic modulus of the shear plate Znet  Zneteve if c = 0 Znet  8.461  in

Znetodd if c = 1

Moment capacity of plate Mc  0.5  Znet  Fuc Mc  245.37  kip  in

Shear capacity of plate Vc  0.3  Anv  Fuc Vc  52.2  kip

2
 V    Ms 
2
Ratio of combined flexural and shear R1    R1  0.276
 Mc 
stress on plate  Vc 
1 > R.1(0.276): Therefore O.K.

Check for buckling capacity of shear plate :-


2
Dp  ts
3
Elastic section modulus Smod  Smod  8.27  in
6

First bolt distance



db1  nr  1  S 
dbd  dbd  3.45  in
2

  e1    dbd 
Cb1   3  ln  1  Cb1  0.918
  Dp    Dp 

Lateral torsional buckling modification factor Cb  Cb1 if Cb1  1.84 Cb  1.84

1.84 otherwise

Young's modulus Es  29000ksi

1.9  Es  Cb
Critical buckling stress Fcr  Fcr  583.41  ksi
 e1  Dp 
 
 t 2 
 s 
2
Dp  ts
Plastic bending momemnt Mp  Fyc  Mp  446.34  kip  in
4
Client : STEEL WORKS OF THE CAROLINAS Date : SEP-20
Project : The New Forrester Center for Calc by : ANP
Behavioral Health Chekd by : KVP
Job No : Revision : 00
Calc no : C004 / 6

Yielding of the plate

 e1  Dp   0.08  Es 
Mn  
0.6  min Mp 1.6  Fyc  Smod if  
 t 2   Fyc 
 s 
   e1  Dp  Fyc   0.08  Es   e1  Dp   1.9  Es 
0.6 min Cb  1.52  0.274      F S
yc mod  Mp if   
   t 2  Es    Fyc   2   Fyc 
   s     ts 
 e1  Dp   1.9  Es 
0.6 min  Fcr  Smod Mp if   Mn  267.81  kip  in
 t 2   Fyc 
 s 
M.n(267.81 kip-in) > M.s(53.12 kip-in): Therefore O.K.

Check for thickness of shear plate :-


d 1
Maximum thickness of shear plate Tpmax   in Tpmax  0.44  in
2 16
T.pmax(0.44 in) > t.s(0.375 in): Therefore O.K.

Check for weld b/w HSS wall and shear plate :-


Length of the weld 
Lw  nr  1 S  2ev  Lw  11.5  in

V kip
Shear force per inch on weld FL  FL  1.087 
2Lw in

5 FL 
Size of fillet weld required D  max  ts   16 D  4  in
 8 0.707  0.3FEXX 
per 16th of inch  
Adopt 1/4" Fillet Weld
 FL  16 
 3.09  
 0.707  0.3FEXX 
Min HSS wall thickness tmin     ksi tmin  0.058  in
Fuh
 
t.cdes(0.291 in) > t.min(0.058 in): Therefore O.K.

 FL  16 
 6.19  
 0.707  0.3FEXX 
Min plate thickness tmin     ksi tmin  0.125  in
Fuc
 
t.s(0.375 in) > t.min(0.125 in): Therefore O.K.

Check for HSS column punching shear :-


Induced moment due to eccentricity Mind  V  e1 Mind  4.43  kip  ft

2
0.5  Fuh  tcdes  Lw
Moment capacity of HSS section Mch  Mch  19.88  kip  ft
5
M.ch(19.88 kip*ft) > M.ind(4.43 kip*ft): Therefore O.K.
Client : STEEL WORKS OF THE CAROLINAS Date : SEP-20
Project : The New Forrester Center for Calc by : ANP
Behavioral Health Chekd by : KVP
Job No : Revision : 00
Calc no : C004 / 7

Check for HSS Wall slenderness under shear loading (Rectangular):-


Es  29000ksi

Width and thick ratio


 
max dc bc  3  tcdes
s  s  14.182
tcdes

Es
Slenderness ratio of HSS a  1.40  a  33.72
Fyh

a(33.72) > s(14.18): Therefore O.K.

Check for HSS Wall slenderness (Rectangular):-

Width and thick ratio



max dc bc 
s  s  17.182
tcdes

40 > s(17.18): Therefore O.K.

Check for flange plate connection :-

Check for weld b/w HSS wall and top flange plate :-

Thickness of top/bottom flange plate tfp  0.375in

Width of top flange plate Wfpt  4.5in

Width of bottom flange plate Wfpb  6.5in

M
Total force due to moment Cf  Cf  18.11  kip
db1

Length of the weld


  
Lw  min Wfpt  bc  2  2.25  tc 
 Lw  3.594  in

Cf kip
Tension/compression force per inch of weld FT  FT  5.04 
Lw in

FT
Size of weld W1  W1  0.233  in
    
min 0.6 min Fyc Fyh 0.5 min Fuc Fuh 0.53  0.6  FEXX 
Adopt CJP weld

t.fp(0.375 in) > W.1(0.233 in): Therefore O.K.

Check for axial capacity of top flange plate :-

Axial capacity 
Fcap  min 0.5Lw  tfp  Fuc 0.6  Lw  tfp  Fyc  Fcap  29.11  kip

F.cap(29.11 kip) > C.f(18.11 kip): Therefore O.K.


Client : STEEL WORKS OF THE CAROLINAS Date : SEP-20
Project : The New Forrester Center for Calc by : ANP
Behavioral Health Chekd by : KVP
Job No : Revision : 00
Calc no : C004 / 8

Check for axial capacity of top flange plate :-


tfb1
Xb  Xb  0.22  in
2
2
3Lw2  Xb 
U  1  U  0.833
2 2  Lw2 
3Lw2  Wfpt 

Axial capacity 
Fcap  min 0.5Wfpt  tfp  U  Fuc 0.6  Wfpt  tfp  Fyc  Fcap  36.45  kip

F.cap(36.45 kip) > C.f(18.11 kip): Therefore O.K.

Check for weld b/w HSS wall and bottom flange plate :-

  10    Fyh  tcdes   b  2  2.25  t 


 
Length of the weld Lw1  min Wfpb  bc  2  2.25  tc  c c Lw1  2.254  in
  bc   Fyc  tfp  
  tcdes  
   
Cf kip
Tension/compression force per inch of weld FT1  FT1  4.018 
2Lw1 in

1 FT1 
Size of fillet weld required D  max  in   16 D  4  in
 4 0.707  0.3FEXX  1.5 
per 16th of inch  
Adopt 1/4" Fillet Weld
 FT1  16 
 3.09  
 0.707  0.3FEXX  1.5 
Min HSS wall thickness tmin     ksi tmin  0.144  in
Fuh
 
t.cdes(0.291 in) > t.min(0.144 in): Therefore O.K.

 FT1  16 
 6.19  
 0.707  0.3FEXX  1.5 
Min plate thickness tmin     ksi tmin  0.308  in
Fuc
 
t.fp(0.375 in) > t.min(0.308 in): Therefore O.K.

Check for axial capacity of flange plate :-


Axial capacity 
Fcap  min 0.5Lw1  tfp  Fuc 0.6  Lw1 tfp  Fyc  Fcap  18.26  kip

F.cap(18.26 kip) > C.f(18.11 kip): Therefore O.K.

Check for axial capacity of flange plate :-

2
3Lw2  Xb 
U  1  U  0.725
2 2  Lw2 
3Lw2  Wfpb 
Client : STEEL WORKS OF THE CAROLINAS Date : SEP-20
Project : The New Forrester Center for Calc by : ANP
Behavioral Health Chekd by : KVP
Job No : Revision : 00
Calc no : C004 / 9

Axial capacity 
Fcap  min 0.5Wfpb  tfp  U  Fuc 0.6  Wfpb  tfp  Fyc  Fcap  51.22  kip

F.cap(51.22 kip) > C.f(18.11 kip): Therefore O.K.

Check for weld b/w beam flange and top/bottom flange plate :-
Length of the weld Lw2  7in  2  0.25in Lw2  6.5  in

Cf kip
Shear force per inch of weld FL1  FL1  1.393 
2Lw2 in

1 FL1 
Size of fillet weld required D  max  in   16 D  4  in
 4 0.707  0.3FEXX 
per 16th of inch  
Adopt 1/4" Fillet Weld
 FL1  16 
 3.09  
 0.707  0.3FEXX 
Min beam flange thickness tmin     ksi tmin  0.071  in
Fum
 
t.fb1(0.44 in) > t.min(0.071 in): Therefore O.K.

 FL1  16 
 6.19  
 0.707  0.3FEXX  1.5 
Min plate thickness tmin     ksi tmin  0.107  in
Fuc
 
t.fp(0.375 in) > t.min(0.107 in): Therefore O.K.

Check for shear capacity of flange plate :-

Shear capacity 
Fcap  2 min 0.3Lw2 tfp  Fuc 0.4  Lw2  tfp  Fyc  Fcap  70.2  kip

F.cap(70.2 kip) > C.f(18.11 kip): Therefore O.K.

Check for compression buckling capacity of flange plate :-

Buckling length Leff  ecl  1.25in Leff  1.75  in

Effective length factor k  1.2


2
tfp
Min radius of gyration ry  ry  0.11  in
12
Leff
Slenderness ratio λ  k  λ  19.40
ry

Young's modulus Es  29000ksi

2
π  Es
Critical buckling stress Fcr  Fcr  760.57  ksi
2
λ
Client : STEEL WORKS OF THE CAROLINAS Date : SEP-20
Project : The New Forrester Center for Calc by : ANP
Behavioral Health Chekd by : KVP
Job No : Revision : 00
Calc no : C004 / 10

 Fyc 
 Fcr 
Allowable compressive strength Fax  0.658   F
yc if Fcr  0.44  Fyc Fax  35.29  ksi

0.877  Fcr if Fcr  0.44  Fyc

Maximum dispersion 
wd  min Wfpt Wfpb 2Lw2  tan ( 30deg)  wd  4.5  in

Buckling capacity of the section Fbsh  0.6wd  ts  Fax Fbsh  35.73  kip

F.bsh(35.74 kip) > C.f(18.11 kip): Therefore O.K.

Check for HSS width ratio :-


bc  2  2.25  tc
Width and thick ratio a  a  0.72
bc
a(0.72 ) < 1: Therefore O.K.

bc  2  2.25  tc
Width and thick ratio a  a  0.72
bc

a(0.72 ) > 0.25: Therefore O.K

Check for HSS wall slenderness :-


 bc dc 
Slenderness ratio a  max    a  17.18
 tcdes tcdes 
a(17.18 ) < 35: Therefore O.K.

Check for supporting HSS yielding capacity :- (for all β )


10
Design strength of HSS Rn  0.63
bc

 Fyh  tcdes  bc  2  2.25  tc  Rn  19.17  kip

tcdes

Design strength of flange plate 


Rn1  0.63Fyc  tfp  bc  2  2.25  tc  Rn1  30.56  kip

R.n1(30.56 kip) > R.n(19.17 kip): Therefore O.K.

R.n(19.17 kip) > C.f(18.11 kip: Therefore O.K

Check for supporting HSS side wall yielding capacity :- (for β = 1 )


Design strength of HSS
 
Rn  0.667 2  Fyh  tcdes  5 1.5t cdes  tfp
  Rn  49.64  kip

R.n(49.64 kip) > C.f(18.11 kip: Therefore O.K

Check for supporting HSS side wall crippling capacity :- (for β = 1 )

U  1 β  1

U
Qf  1.3  0.4  Qf  0.9
β
Client : STEEL WORKS OF THE CAROLINAS Date : SEP-20
Project : The New Forrester Center for Calc by : ANP
Behavioral Health Chekd by : KVP
Job No : Revision : 00
Calc no : C004 / 11

2 
3tfp 
Design strength of HSS Rn  0.5  1.6  tcdes   1    E F Q
s yh f Rn  93.75  kip
 dc  3tc 

R.n(93.75 kip) > C.f(18.11 kip: Therefore O.K

Check for shear yielding (punching) of supporting HSS :-


10  bc  2  2.25  tc 
Bep  Bep  2.092  in
bc

tcdes

0.6
Design strength of HSS Rn  F t
1.58 yh cdes

 2tfp  2Bep  Rn  27.26  kip

R.n(27.26 kip) > C.f(18.11 kip: Therefore O.K

End of calculation

You might also like