Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full download Working from Within: The Nature and Development of Quine’s Naturalism Sander Verhaegh file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download Working from Within: The Nature and Development of Quine’s Naturalism Sander Verhaegh file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download Working from Within: The Nature and Development of Quine’s Naturalism Sander Verhaegh file pdf all chapter on 2024
https://ebookmass.com/product/cognitive-and-working-memory-
training-perspectives-from-psychology-neuroscience-and-human-
development-jared-m-novick/
https://ebookmass.com/product/from-psychology-to-morality-essays-
in-ethical-naturalism-john-deigh/
https://ebookmass.com/product/work-well-from-home-staying-
effective-in-the-age-of-remote-and-hybrid-working-bloomsbury-
publishing/
Thermofluids: From Nature to Engineering Ting
https://ebookmass.com/product/thermofluids-from-nature-to-
engineering-ting/
https://ebookmass.com/product/all-talked-out-naturalism-and-the-
future-of-philosophy-j-d-trout/
https://ebookmass.com/product/innovation-from-within-redefining-
how-nonprofits-solve-problems-stephanie-berzin/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-working-class-from-marx-to-our-
times-marcelo-badaro-mattos/
https://ebookmass.com/product/wiley-schnellkurs-europarecht-
gerald-sander/
Working from Within
Working from Within
The Nature and Development
of Quine’s Naturalism
1
1
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers
the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education
by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University
Press in the UK and certain other countries.
1 3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2
Printed by Sheridan Books, Inc., United States of America
Cover picture by Marjorie Boynton Quine (1947). Reprinted with permission from
Douglas B. Quine, Ph.D., Quine Literary Estate.
It is understandable [ . . . ] that the philosopher should seek a transcen-
dental vantage point, outside the world that imprisons [the] natural
scientist and mathematician. He would make himself independent of
the conceptual scheme which it is his task to study and revise. “Give
me πoυ στω [a place to stand],” Archimedes said, “and I will move the
world.” However, there is no such cosmic exile. [ . . . ] The philosopher
is in the position rather, as Neurath says, “of a mariner who must re-
build his ship on the open sea.”
—W. V. Quine (notes for Sign and Object, November 5, 1944)
CONTENTS
Preface xi
List of Abbreviations xv
1. Introduction 1
1.1. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 1
1.2. NATURALISM AND ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY 4
1.3. WORKING FROM WITHIN 6
1.4. READING QUINE IN HISTORICAL CONTEXT 8
1.5. PLAN 10
PART I NATURE
2. Naturalizing Epistemology 15
2.1. INTRODUCTION 15
2.2. FROM CERTAINTY TO STRAIGHT PSYCHOLOGY 18
2.3. TWO STRATEGIES 24
2.4. SELF-SUFFICIENT SENSORY LANGUAGES 26
2.5. QUINE’S RESPONSE TO THE SKEPTIC 30
2.6. REINTERPRETING “EPISTEMOLOGY NATURALIZED” 32
3. Naturalizing Metaphysics 36
3.1. INTRODUCTION 36
3.2. INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL EXISTENCE CLAIMS 39
3.3. TWO DISTINCTIONS 42
viii Contents
4. In Mediis Rebus 54
4.1. INTRODUCTION 54
4.2. THREE COMMITMENTS 56
4.3. A QUIRK OF USAGE 62
4.4. DEFLATION, DEFLATION, DEFLATION 66
4.5. THE BOUNDS OF SCIENCE 69
4.6. IMMANENCE AND TRANSCENDENCE 71
4.7. ARTIFICIAL LANGUAGES 74
4.8. CONCLUSION 75
PART II DEVELOPMENT
8. Conclusion 162
Appendix 165
A.1. Editorial Introduction 165
A.1.1. Editorial Remarks 166
A.2. Logic, Mathematics, Science (1940) 167
A.3. Sign and Object; or, The Semantics of Being (1944) 172
A.3.1. The Reality of the External World 172
A.3.2. Things and Events 173
A.4. An Extensionalist Definition of Meaning (1949) 177
A.5. The Present State of Empiricism (1951) 180
A.6. The Sophisticated Irrational (1965) 189
Bibliography 191
Index 209
P R E FA C E
This book is the result of almost nine years of thinking and writing about Quine’s
naturalism. The project started with a term paper on the Carnap-Quine debate
for Jeanne Peijnenburg’s inspiring course on the history of analytic philosophy
in 2008 and gradually evolved into a dissertation about the relation between ho-
lism and naturalism in Quine’s philosophy, which I defended in Groningen in
2015. Encouraged by the warm support of my colleagues and a number of fellow
Quine scholars, I spent the last three years revising and extending the manu-
script. Having acquired a serious case of “archive fever,” a significant chunk of
this period was spent at the W. V. Quine Papers at Houghton Library, Harvard
University. Using his published corpus as well as thousands of letters, notes,
draft manuscripts, lectures, grant proposals, teaching materials, and annotations
collected at the archives, I have aimed to write a book that reconstructs both
the nature and the development of Quine’s naturalism. The notes, letters, and
lectures that have most influenced my views about (the development of) Quine’s
naturalism are transcribed and collected in the appendix.
Parts of this book have been published elsewhere. I thank the respective
journals for granting me permission to reprint these papers:
Quine’s argument from despair (2014). British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 22(1), 150–73.
(Chapter 2)
Blurring boundaries: Carnap, Quine, and the internal-external distinction (2017). Erkenntnis,
82(4), 873–90. (Chapter 3)
Boarding Neurath’s boat: The early development of Quine’s naturalism (2017). Journal for the
History of Philosophy, 55(2), 317–42. (Sections 4.1–4.2, 6.2, and 6.6)
Quine on the nature of naturalism (2017). Southern Journal of Philosophy, 55(1), 96–115.
(Section 4.5)
Sign and object: Quine’s forgotten book project (forthcoming). Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s11229-018-1693-z. (Chapter 5)
Quine’s “needlessly strong” holism (2017). Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part A,
61(1), 11–20. (Sections 6.8–6.11)
Setting sail: The development and reception of Quine’s naturalism (forthcoming). Philosophers’
Imprint. (Chapter 7)
xi
xii Preface
Still, this book aims to be more than a collection of papers. Many sections have
been revised, extended, and rewritten for the purposes of this book. Moreover,
an introductory chapter, a conclusion, several new sections (i.e., 4.3–4.4, 4.6–
4.8, 5.5, 6.3–6.5, 6.7), and an appendix have been included to fill the gaps and to
present a comprehensive account of Quine’s naturalism.
Much of this research has been funded by the Netherlands Organisation for
Scientific Research (grants 322-20-001 and 275-20-064). My research visits to
Harvard University, Houghton Library, Bethel, Connecticut, and the Harvard
University Archives have been funded by a Kristeller-Popkin Travel Fellowship
from the Journal of the History of Philosophy, a Rodney G. Dennis Fellowship in
the Study of Manuscripts from Houghton Library, and a Travel Bursary from
the Evert Willem Beth Foundation. I am very grateful for this financial support.
Finally, it is my great pleasure to thank the many people without whom
I could not have completed this book: Jeanne Peijnenburg, Allard Tamminga,
Lieven Decock, Gary Ebbs, Hans-Johann Glock, Peter Hylton, Gary Kemp,
Fred Muller, Martin Lenz, and two anonymous referees for Oxford University
Press who commented on earlier versions of this book; Harvard’s Department
of Philosophy, Nyasha Borde, Monique Duhaime, Juliet Floyd, Warren
Goldfarb, Leslie Morris, Mark Richard, Thomas Ricketts, and the staff at
Houghton Library and the Harvard University Archives for their warm wel-
come during my research visits; Douglas and Maryclaire Quine for welcoming
me into their house to examine the remaining fifty-seven boxes of unproc-
essed archive material; Hannah Doyle, Lucy Randall, Richard Isomaki, Leslie
Johson, and Tharani Ramachandran at Oxford University Press and Newgen
for smoothly guiding my manuscript through the editing and production pro-
cess; Jody Azzouni, Richard Creath, Fons Dewulf, Dagfinn Føllesdal, James
Levine, Eric Schliesser, Andrew Smith, Serdal Tumkaya, Thomas Uebel, Wim
Vanrie, the members of the EPS seminar in Tilburg, the members of the PCCP
and the WiP seminars in Groningen, and audiences in Amsterdam, Athens,
Bloomington, Bologna, Calgary, Chicago, Denver, Edinburgh, Groningen,
Konstanz, Manchester, Milan, Modena, Munich, Rotterdam, Tampa,
Tilburg, and Zurich for their comments on various papers and chapters in
various stages; Reto Gubelmann, Frederique Janssen-Lauret, Gary Kemp,
and Sean Morris for their wonderful Quine workshops in Denver, Glasgow,
Manchester, and Zurich; and Douglas B. Quine (W. V. Quine Literary Estate)
and Catherine Z. Elgin (Literary executor for Nelson Goodman) for granting
me permission to publish some of Quine’s and Goodman’s papers, notes, and
letters in an appendix to this book. Of course, the above individuals do not
necessarily agree with my conclusions, and they are not responsible for any
residual errors or omissions.
Preface xiii
Archival Sources
Item 31 Correspondence with the American Philosophical
Association (1936–1986)
Item 40 Correspondence Ap-through As-(various dates)
Item 86 Correspondence with Lars Bergström (1988–1996)
Item 96 Correspondence with Evert Willem Beth (1947–1964)
Item 205 Correspondence with the Center for Advanced Study in the
Behavioral Sciences (1955–1979)
Item 224 Correspondence with Alonzo Church (1935–1994)
Item 231 Correspondence with Joseph T. Clark (1951–1953)
Item 234 Correspondence Co-(various dates)
Item 248 Correspondence with Columbia University (1949–1970)
xv
xvi Abbreviations
Published Works
ANM Animadversion on the Notion of Meaning (1949)
AWVQ Autobiography of W. V. Quine (1986)
CA Carnap (1987)
CB Comment on Berger (1990)
CCE Confessions of a Confirmed Extensionalist and Other
Essays (2008)
Abbreviations xix
"But you must have been crazy," cried Edith brokenly. "I thought
you were going to fix it all up there and shake hands. That's why I
went away."
"Did you want us to fix it up?" "Of course not, I never want to see
them again. But I thought of course that was what you were going to
do." She was touching the bruises on his neck and back with iodine
as he sat placidly in a hot bath. "I'm going to get the doctor," she said
insistently. "You may be hurt internally."
He shook his head. "Not a chance," he answered. "I don't want
this to get all over town."
"I don't understand yet how it all happened."
"Neither do I." He smiled grimly. "I guess these baby parties are
pretty rough affairs."
"Well, one thing—" suggested Edith hopefully, "I'm certainly glad
we have beefsteak in the house for to-morrow's dinner."
"Why?"
"For your eye, of course. Do you know I came within an ace of
ordering veal? Wasn't that the luckiest thing?"
Half an hour later, dressed except that his neck would
accommodate no collar, John moved his limbs experimentally before
the glass. "I believe I'll get myself in better shape," he said
thoughtfully. "I must be getting old."
"You mean so that next time you can beat him?"
"I did beat him," he announced. "At least, I beat him as much as
he beat me. And there isn't going to be any next time. Don't you go
calling people common any more. If you get in any trouble, you just
take your coat and go home. Understand?"
"Yes, dear," she said meekly. "I was very foolish and now I
understand."
Out in the hall, he paused abruptly by the baby's door.
"Is she asleep?"
"Sound asleep. But you can go in and peek at her—just to say
good night."
They tiptoed in and bent together over the bed. Little Ede, her
cheeks flushed with health, her pink hands clasped tight together,
was sleeping soundly in the cool, dark room. John reached over the
railing of the bed and passed his hand lightly over the silken hair.
"She's asleep," he murmured in a puzzled way.
"Naturally, after such an afternoon."
"Miz Andros," the colored maid's stage whisper floated in from the
hall, "Mr. and Miz Markey down-stairs an' want to see you. Mr.
Markey he's all cut up in pieces, mam'n. His face look like a roast
beef. An' Miz Markey she 'pear mighty mad."
"Why, what incomparable nerve!" exclaimed Edith. "Just tell them
we're not home. I wouldn't go down for anything in the world."
"You most certainly will." John's voice was hard and set.
"What?"
"You'll go down right now, and, what's more, whatever that other
woman does, you'll apologize for what you said this afternoon. After
that you don't ever have to see her again."
"Why—John, I can't."
"You've got to. And just remember that she probably hated to
come over here just twice as much as you hate to go down-stairs."
"Aren't you coming? Do I have to go alone?" "I'll be down—in just
a minute."
John Andros waited until she had closed the door behind her;
then he reached over into the bed, and picking up his daughter,
blankets and all, sat down in the rocking-chair holding her tightly in
his arms. She moved a little, and he held his breath, but she was
sleeping soundly, and in a moment she was resting quietly in the
hollow of his elbow. Slowly he bent his head until his cheek was
against her bright hair. "Dear little girl," he whispered. "Dear little girl,
dear little girl."
John Andros knew at length what it was he had fought for so
savagely that evening. He had it now, he possessed it forever, and
for some time he sat there rocking very slowly to and fro in the
darkness.
ABSOLUTION
There was once a priest with cold, watery eyes, who, in the still of
the night, wept cold tears. He wept because the afternoons were
warm and long, and he was unable to attain a complete mystical
union with our Lord. Sometimes, near four o'clock, there was a rustle
of Swede girls along the path by his window, and in their shrill
laughter he found a terrible dissonance that made him pray aloud for
the twilight to come. At twilight the laughter and the voices were
quieter, but several times he had walked past Romberg's Drug Store
when it was dusk and the yellow lights shone inside and the nickel
taps of the soda-fountain were gleaming, and he had found the scent
of cheap toilet soap desperately sweet upon the air. He passed that
way when he returned from hearing confessions on Saturday nights,
and he grew careful to walk on the other side of the street so that the
smell of the soap would float upward before it reached his nostrils as
it drifted, rather like incense, toward the summer moon.
But there was no escape from the hot madness of four o'clock.
From his window, as far as he could see, the Dakota wheat thronged
the valley of the Red River. The wheat was terrible to look upon and
the carpet pattern to which in agony he bent his eyes sent his
thought brooding through grotesque labyrinths, open always to the
unavoidable sun.
One afternoon when he had reached the point where the mind
runs down like an old clock, his housekeeper brought into his study a
beautiful, intense little boy of eleven named Rudolph Miller. The little
boy sat down in a patch of sunshine, and the priest, at his walnut
desk, pretended to be very busy. This was to conceal his relief that
some one had come into his haunted room.
Presently he turned around and found himself staring into two
enormous, staccato eyes, lit with gleaming points of cobalt light. For
a moment their expression startled him—then he saw that his visitor
was in a state of abject fear.
"Your mouth is trembling," said Father Schwartz, in a haggard
voice.
The little boy covered his quivering mouth with his hand.
"Are you in trouble?" asked Father Schwartz, sharply. "Take your
hand away from your mouth and tell me what's the matter."
The boy—Father Schwartz recognized him now as the son of a
parishioner, Mr. Miller, the freight-agent—moved his hand reluctantly
off his mouth and became articulate in a despairing whisper.
"Father Schwartz—I've committed a terrible sin."
"A sin against purity?"
"No, Father ... worse."
Father Schwartz's body jerked sharply.
"Have you killed somebody?"
"No—but I'm afraid—" the voice rose to a shrill whimper.
"Do you want to go to confession?"
The little boy shook his head miserably. Father Schwartz cleared
his throat so that he could make his voice soft and say some quiet,
kind thing. In this moment he should forget his own agony, and try to
act like God. He repeated to himself a devotional phrase, hoping that
in return God would help him to act correctly.
"Tell me what you've done," said his new soft voice.
The little boy looked at him through his tears, and was reassured
by the impression of moral resiliency which the distraught priest had
created. Abandoning as much of himself as he was able to this man,
Rudolph Miller began to tell his story.
"On Saturday, three days ago, my father he said I had to go to
confession, because I hadn't been for a month, and the family they
go every week, and I hadn't been. So I just as leave go, I didn't care.
So I put it off till after supper because I was playing with a bunch of
kids and father asked me if I went, and I said 'no,' and he took me by
the neck and he said 'You go now,' so I said 'All right,' so I went over
to church. And he yelled after me: 'Don't come back till you go.'..."
II
III