Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 17

Industrial Relations in Canada 3rd

Edition Hebdon Solutions Manual


Go to download the full and correct content document:
https://testbankfan.com/product/industrial-relations-in-canada-3rd-edition-hebdon-solu
tions-manual/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...

Industrial Relations in Canada 3rd Edition Hebdon Test


Bank

https://testbankfan.com/product/industrial-relations-in-
canada-3rd-edition-hebdon-test-bank/

Industrial Relations in Canada 2nd Edition Hebdon Test


Bank

https://testbankfan.com/product/industrial-relations-in-
canada-2nd-edition-hebdon-test-bank/

Industrial Relations in Canada 4th Edition McQuarrie


Solutions Manual

https://testbankfan.com/product/industrial-relations-in-
canada-4th-edition-mcquarrie-solutions-manual/

Canadian Industrial Relations 3rd Edition Peirce Test


Bank

https://testbankfan.com/product/canadian-industrial-
relations-3rd-edition-peirce-test-bank/
Medical Surgical Nursing in Canada 3rd Edition Lewis
Solutions Manual

https://testbankfan.com/product/medical-surgical-nursing-in-
canada-3rd-edition-lewis-solutions-manual/

Nursing Research in Canada 3rd Edition Wood Test Bank

https://testbankfan.com/product/nursing-research-in-canada-3rd-
edition-wood-test-bank/

Community Health Nursing in Canada 3rd Edition Stanhope


Test Bank

https://testbankfan.com/product/community-health-nursing-in-
canada-3rd-edition-stanhope-test-bank/

Medical Surgical Nursing in Canada 3rd Edition Lewis


Test Bank

https://testbankfan.com/product/medical-surgical-nursing-in-
canada-3rd-edition-lewis-test-bank/

Business Mathematics In Canada 7th Edition Jerome


Solutions Manual

https://testbankfan.com/product/business-mathematics-in-
canada-7th-edition-jerome-solutions-manual/
Chapter 6: The Management Perspective

Chapter 6 – The Management Perspective

Chapter Objectives
By the end of this chapter, you will be able to discuss
• the evolving managerial view;
• the growing role of management in the industrial relations system;
• the relationship between business and industrial relations strategies;
• the various management strategies as they relate to unionization; and
• current managerial perspectives and trends.

Chapter Summary

Chapter 6 provides an in-depth review of the management actor of the IR system. The chapter
starts with a historical overview of management views (e.g., Taylorism) and then moves to more
current management perspectives (e.g., high performance HRM). Considerable emphasis is
placed on the role of strategy in HRM, changing management practices, as well as high
performance HRM practices.

Several of the chapter elements can be delivered in three components.


1. Lecture. Use PowerPoints® to highlight key points of the chapter.
2. Class exercise based on a media story concerning an employer in the local community (or
uses a web clip/video that focuses on the employer’s perspective). Distribute a copy of the
article in class (or present web clip/video via whatever technology exists in the classroom).
Ask students (either in groups or individually) to apply chapter concepts to the article.
3. End of chapter cases and exercises. Cases and exercises that examine the field of IR can be
utilized at the end of the chapter to test the students on the chapter elements. They can also
be utilized as test questions, hand in assignments, or in-class exercises.

Instructor’s Manual to accompany Industrial Relations in Canada, 3e 6-1


Chapter 6: The Management Perspective

Lecture Outline

COMMENTS ACTIVITY

A. The Evolving Managerial View Present Learning Objectives in PPT Slide 6-2.
Briefly Review
• Master-servant relationship Prior to start of lecture, have students view/read a
• Scientific management (Taylorism) media article that focuses on the employer’s
• Human relations perspective on a local issue. Alternatively, have
• HRM and organizational justice them read the opening CHL vignette or present
YouTube videos concerning Westjet (focuses on
culture):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J07hF8vmq0s
and
CHL players’ lawsuit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YqIey8SXFi8

Review PPT Slides 6-3 and 6-4

B. Growing Role of Management in IR Review PPT Slides 6-5 through 6-7


Strategic Choice Framework of Kochan,
Katz, and McKersie (KKM) Referring to the article or YouTube videos from
• Trends in US 1960s-1980s part A, ask students if they feel that Dunlop’s
• Key elements of model (three concept of shared ideology still exists today
levels of decision making, they (emphasize the increasing role of management and
must work together over long-term the fact that, in some cases, we see movement to
to achieve major goal) union-free workplaces).

Canadian implications of KKM Ask students to describe if KKM applies in Canada.


• Does KKM apply in Canada Record views on board, then present arguments
from text.

Business and IR strategies Present PPT Slides 6-8 and 6-9.


• Assessment of the external and
internal environments
• Strategy formation
• Strategy implementation
• Strategy evaluation
• HRM strategies (practices,
policies, philosophy

6-2 Copyright © 2016 by Nelson Education Ltd.


Chapter 6: The Management Perspective

COMMENTS ACTIVITY

Management strategies related to unions Ask students to describe how different employers
(including Canadian evidence) may react to unionization (or potential
• Union acceptance unionization). Record answers on a board. Then
• Union avoidance present management strategies related to unions
• Union removal (review PPT Slides 6-10 and 6-11) and link
• Union substitution student points to the four strategies.

Alternatives:

1. Refer to opening article or YouTube clips


(see point A). Have students identify the
management strategy that best identifies the
management view of each article/clip.
2. Prior to class, have speaker from local
business come into class. In next class, ask
students to identify management strategy
related to unions.
3. Ask students to think of where they work
and then identify the management strategy
in their workplace as it relates to unions.

Instructor’s Manual to accompany Industrial Relations in Canada, 3e 6-3


Chapter 6: The Management Perspective

COMMENTS ACTIVITY

C. Current Managerial Perspectives Review PPT Slides 6-12 through 6-17.


Trends
Alternatives for after presentation:
High performance workplaces and 1. Refer to the article or clips used for part A.
practices Have students examine the extent that they
• Ability enhancing practices. can find examples of new managerial
• Motivation-enhancing practices. perspectives/trends.
• Opportunity-enhancing practices. 2. Prior to class, have guest speaker from local
business come in. In next class, examine
Nonunion employee-management (NER) the extent that the speaker discussed
plans examples of new managerial
• Evolutionary perspectives/trends.
• Unity of Interest 3. Ask students to think of where they work
• Union Avoidance and then apply key elements of this section
to their workplace.
• Complementary Voice
4. Ask students to read IR Notebook 6.2.
• Professional Associations
Have them discuss the extent that the
NLMA employment relationship with the
Non-standard work
employer is akin to a union-management
• Employment terms
relationship.
• Location
• Work schedules
• Pay

D. Summary Review PPT Slide 6-18.

End of Chapter Materials

Suggested answers (or teaching points) are in bold.

Discussion Questions

1. Some argue that high-performance work practices, nonunion representation, and nonstandard
work practices are designed to be forms of union substitution and/or union avoidance. Do
you feel this is true? Why or why not?
Potential answer. Many of the items (high-performance work practices, nonunion
representation) are designed to improve employee perceptions of justice and voice.
Justice and voice are key functions of unions and collective representation. Whether
intentional or not on the part of the employer, these practices can be seen as union
avoidance. Non-standard work is more focused on meeting competitive business needs
than employee equity/voice needs – less likely to be a pure union avoidance issue.

6-4 Copyright © 2016 by Nelson Education Ltd.


Chapter 6: The Management Perspective

2. Many students using this textbook have yet to start a full-time career path. These students
will enter the full-time labour force at a time of massive retirements due to the aging baby
boomers. Do you feel that the movement toward high-performance work practices, nonunion
representation, and nonstandard work practices will continue during these students’ careers?
Justify your answer.
Potential answer. The movement to some of these practices (high-performance work
practices, NER) are designed to improve employee perceptions of justice and voice.
Justice and voice are important to youth – and indeed all workers. This trend will
likely continue in students’ careers – unless NER is seen as less effective than
unionization – then we may see a movement away from NER and towards
unionization.

The movement to non-standard work is largely a response to efficiency and cost


containment. The increased focus on global competitiveness, the need for increased (if
not continuous) availability to the customer base (24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365
days a year), the global nature of market place (where customers can be from
anywhere in the world), combined with employees increasingly seeking work-life
balance, will likely mean that non-standard jobs will continue long term.

3. Assume you are a labour leader and that you are trying to organize a nonunion firm that has
high-performance work practices and nonunion employee representation practices in place.
What would you tell employees are the advantages of unionization even with these
progressive HRM practices
Potential answer. While the movements to such practices are designed to improve
employee perceptions of justice and voice, the lack of a formal unionization restricts
employee power. Employees, even with these progressive HRM practices and NER, are
still employed under common law. An employee can therefore be fired at any time (no
just cause needed – only issue is notice), and there are no formal, independent third
party dispute resolution requirements (e.g., arbitration), and the employees do not have
the legal right to strike as a formal protest. In short, the employees have less power
relative to formal, certified, union representation.

4. Given the number of multinational companies and companies that operate in both Canada
and the United States, do you believe that Canada will see an increased usage of the union
removal and substitution strategies that are more common in the U.S.? Why or why not?
No set answer here. Students may argue that the history of Canada follows U.S. trends,
the slight decrease in unionization in Canada, and the limited ability of unions to
organize youth may see an increased usage of union removal and substitution strategies.
However, we must also note that Canadian Labour Relations Boards have been less
likely to turn a blind-eye to anti-union activities of employers.

Instructor’s Manual to accompany Industrial Relations in Canada, 3e 6-5


Chapter 6: The Management Perspective

5. In your opinion, can employers expect highly engaged employees who seek to improve the
performance of the firm if they continue to use nonstandard work arrangements? Justify your
answer.
No set answer here. Students may argue that these practices are geared more to meet
business versus employee needs. The evidence to date suggests that employees in
nonstandard work arrangements have fewer benefits, lower wages, and less job security
relative to workers in “standard” jobs. This could result in a less commitment
workplace for employers who use these practices heavily – especially if they are not
buffed with progressive HRM practices (high-performance work practices) discussed in
the chapter.

Using the Internet

1. Many colleges and universities use part-time instructors, faculty, and teachers in addition
to full-time staff. As examples, look at the websites for the Association of Part-Time
Professors at the University of Ottawa (http://www.aptpuo.ca) and the Concordia
University Part-Time Faculty Association (http://www.cupfa.org). Also examine an
article on the Canadian Association of University Teachers, or CAUT, website written by
Diane Huberman-Arnold that outlines the challenges of part-time faculty
(http://www.cautbulletin.ca/en_article.asp?articleid=2185).

On the basis of what you have learned from this chapter, and of insights gleaned from
these websites, why do you think university administrations (i.e., management) use part-
timers and would prefer that they remain nonunion?
Emphasize cost minimization (less benefits, pay etc.), employer flexibility in terms of
staff utilization, hiring, work assignment, termination, etc.

Exercises

1. Have a look at the faculty collective agreement (or handbook if your faculty is not
unionized). Does it contain language concerning any of the current managerial trends in
terms of high-performance work practices, nonunion employee representation, and
nonstandard work practices? Look for keywords like committees, work schedules,
alternative work arrangements, contractual, part-time appointments, quality, teams,
TQM, etc.
Highlight relevant sections.

2. Look at recent job postings for your academic institution. How many of the postings are
for nonstandard work versus permanent full-time work? How many are for unionized
versus nonunionized positions? Highlight trends (note any differences based on
clerical versus non-clerical roles, entry level positions versus senior positions, etc.).

6-6 Copyright © 2016 by Nelson Education Ltd.


Chapter 6: The Management Perspective

3. In looking at the job postings and/or the collective agreement, would you say your
university or college has a traditional (i.e., hourly or salaried human resources) model or
a high-performance model? Justify your answer.
University is traditional – probably as public sector. Highlight trends (note any
differences based on clerical versus non-clerical roles, entry level positions versus
senior positions, etc.). Discuss whether labour market (supply and demand for
labour) has played a role in any of the differences found.

4. Of the forms of management strategies toward unions, which do you feel exists on your
campus? Why?
Union acceptance likely given public sector, funding of governments (not likely to be
anti-union), highly unionized industry throughout Canada, etc.

Case Questions

Case: Provincial Wine Corporation (PWC)

1. What type of union strategy is PWC using?


Union acceptance – no indication of anti-union activity or desire to become
nonunion – they seek stable and committed workforce

2. Do you see evidence of the managerial trends of high-performance work practices,


nonunion employee representation, and nonstandard work practices present in the case?
High performance work practices such as information sharing and teamwork all
seen as important plus focus on employee commitment. Nonunion representation
does not exist. Nonstandard work practices exist in terms of casual and part-time
staff.

3. Has there been a strong linkage between the industrial relations and business strategies of
the organization? To what extent?
We see linkage as restructuring plan required collective agreement changes (e.g.,
wage increases that were lower than what other provincial employees received as a
way to establish the new organization and enhance job security). The resulting
collective agreement also allowed PWC increased flexibility to hire more part-time
and casual workers.

4. Given the case at hand, what would you suggest the firm do in terms of making changes
to its current strategies?
May need to reinforce training, consider group level variable pay, and any other
reasonable issue given case facts.

Instructor’s Manual to accompany Industrial Relations in Canada, 3e 6-7


Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”

• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who


notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that
s/he does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™
License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and
discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of Project
Gutenberg™ works.

• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of


any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in
the electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90
days of receipt of the work.

• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project


Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different
terms than are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain
permission in writing from the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, the manager of the Project Gutenberg™
trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3
below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend


considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on,
transcribe and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright
law in creating the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite
these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the
medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,”
such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt
data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other
medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES -


Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in
paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
and any other party distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic
work under this agreement, disclaim all liability to you for
damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees. YOU
AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE,
STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH
OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH
1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER
THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR
ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE
OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF
THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If


you discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of
receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you
paid for it by sending a written explanation to the person you
received the work from. If you received the work on a physical
medium, you must return the medium with your written
explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the
defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu
of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or
entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund.
If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund
in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set


forth in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’,
WITH NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR
ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied


warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this
agreement violates the law of the state applicable to this
agreement, the agreement shall be interpreted to make the
maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by the applicable
state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of
this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the


Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the
Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any
volunteers associated with the production, promotion and
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless
from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that
arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project
Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or
deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any Defect
you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of


Project Gutenberg™
Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new
computers. It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of
volunteers and donations from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the


assistance they need are critical to reaching Project
Gutenberg™’s goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™
collection will remain freely available for generations to come. In
2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was
created to provide a secure and permanent future for Project
Gutenberg™ and future generations. To learn more about the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your
efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the
Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project


Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-
profit 501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the
laws of the state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by
the Internal Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal
tax identification number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax
deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S. federal laws and
your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500


West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact
links and up to date contact information can be found at the
Foundation’s website and official page at
www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to


the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation
Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without
widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission
of increasing the number of public domain and licensed works
that can be freely distributed in machine-readable form
accessible by the widest array of equipment including outdated
equipment. Many small donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly
important to maintaining tax exempt status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws


regulating charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of
the United States. Compliance requirements are not uniform
and it takes a considerable effort, much paperwork and many
fees to meet and keep up with these requirements. We do not
solicit donations in locations where we have not received written
confirmation of compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or
determine the status of compliance for any particular state visit
www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states


where we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know
of no prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from
donors in such states who approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot


make any statements concerning tax treatment of donations
received from outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp
our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current


donation methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a
number of other ways including checks, online payments and
credit card donations. To donate, please visit:
www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project


Gutenberg™ electronic works
Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could
be freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose
network of volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several


printed editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by
copyright in the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus,
we do not necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any
particular paper edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™,


including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new
eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear
about new eBooks.

You might also like