DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING

COMMUNITIES
Project proposal for Angola

submitted by:
 DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES
KEY ELEMENTS

CORE
For
whom?
TARGET SEGMENT

How? Where?

PLAN SCENARIOS
What?

What
Who?
if?
TEAM Why? CONTINGENCIES

Backbone of the proposal Linking elements

EXPECTATIONS 2
 DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES
TEAM

Partners
Financial

Equity
Resources
Material
Resources

Operational
Resources
Consultants

Organizational
Resources
Enabling
3
Resources
DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

4
DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

5
WATER AND SANITATION :
Liquid to be truly life
and health for the
Angolans

GREENHOUSES AND
AGRICULTURE :
A friendly management of
Angolan countryside

SOCIAL SELF‐SUSTAINING
ROOM :
Efficient and worthy
housing for the Angolans

ENERGY AND HEAT :

To move to Angola
DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

WASTE USAGE AND

DEPURATION :
Reduction, reuse and
recycling
6
DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

7
 Population = 27.2 millions ( = 0.4 millions)

Millions of
houses
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

Existing = 4.146

Impairment loss = 0.263

Latent deficit = 1.439

8
 DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

Limited public
resources for
social room
High occupation Minimum
costs private
investment for
High construction
social housing
costs

Minimum payment
capacity
High % ‐ living
No saving Unattainable in informal
capacity down payment settlements
Undeveloped dwelling
finance system 9
DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

10
 DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

Benefit
Beneficio

Production
Produção
of
depanels
painéis Burn
Queima

Destination of waste

Construction Crop
Colheita
Sowing
Plantação 11
of dwellings
 DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

1‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Reductions in construction costs, land
and funding, and therefore the .
market price of social housing
2‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Improving the health of beneficiary .
communities and, consequently, a .
reduction in health corrective costs .
3‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
A reduction in CO2 emissions
4‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Decreased work and .
school absenteeism
5‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Increase family members self‐steam
. and better options for having a
. . formal insertion into the society
6‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Increase the safety of beneficiary
.communities
7‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Reduction of generalized travel
costs (CTC’s)
8‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
An additional yield for farmers for
generating sub products

12
 DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

Land for factory Land for construction of

of panels houses and local services
= 25 Ha = 37 Ha

Building permits for 500 homes

13
DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

14
 DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

Food imports
US$ 129 bill US$ 5.273 (2014)
at current prices per capita Between
50 e 90%

4.2% 11%
5.645 US$ mill 35
real Agricultural
growth % of GDP Imports Agricultural Exports

124 mill Ha 90% of total

Total land Agricultural units,
small to medium

58 mill Ha 4,6 mill Ha

15
Area of arable land Area of arable land (exploited)
 DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

Greenhouse
crops
Use
Uso of
de
agricultural
desperdícios
waste
agrícolas

Mangrove Harvests
Man
Man
swamp opencast

Treated water 16
 DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

Performance ‐18%

Breakeven
Transgenic 7%

Traditional Greenhouses

Prices + 32%
$ 17
 DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

Discount Extra income for

12%
rate farmers

I.R.R. Between 45 ‐ 55% US$ 9.870/1.000 Ton3

Return Between 3 ‐ 4
US$ 12.570/1.000 Ha
period years

18
 DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

1‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Increase of the agricultural
production ..
2‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Improvement in the quality of
the agricultural production.
3‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Improvement in the quality of feeding .
of the benefited communities and, .
derived, reduction in corrective
costs of health
4‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Increase in the self‐esteem of the
. members of the family and better
. opptions of formal insertion in the society
5‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Retention and rooting of the
population in the rural zones
6‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Growth of the net utility in
the agricultural activities
7‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
. Reduction of the negative impacts
on the ecosystems

 8 Reduction
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
of costs of the
agricultural production 19
 DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

Total exemptions
for 3 years
Production of Land for
raw materials for houses Agricultural production
(straw of rice) (glasshouses)
= 1.900 ton3 = 1.235 – 2.470 Ha

Support for certificates

DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

21
 DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

19 Mill

Improved Unimproved Improved Unimproved

unimproved
Other

17%
31%
premises
Piped on

unimproved
21%

Other

3.361

58%
3.984
5.921
30%

defecation
improved

25%
Open
Other

Surface
water

18%

11.056
5.774 3.433 4.665
22
 DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

Waters treated Storage pool

for agriculture

Crops
Colheita
Foods

Swamp
Mangue of
Drinking
water out degray
águas
waters
cinzas
of thin air

Biodigestor
Sewage
Waste
water
water
23
DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

24
 DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

1‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Increased in treated water
+ consumption ..
2‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Postponement or cancellation of
investments in treated water .
3‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Value of water resources in which .
negative impacts are avoided.
4‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Costs avoided by lower .
morbidity and lower mortality
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐5
Increase in net surplus of productive
. activities
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐6
Decreased work and school
. absenteeism
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐7
.Reduction of bad smells and harmful
fauna
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐8
. Reduction of negative impacts on
ecosystems

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐9
Opportunity costs of time saved 25
DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

26
 DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

2000 2012 % inc

Rural Urban Total m3 of
Access to
electricity 12% 46% 30%
wood fuel 3,2 3,8 21%
consumption
Annual growth Main access
12% to energy
2000‐2012 64%
(Rural)

Emissions
Energy (Kt) 2000 2008
consumed by 60%
households 9,400 25,700
Time of annual lighting,
Emissions 2000 2008
considering total attention
per capita
3,3 to the population 0,63 1,37
(tm) 27
(months)
 DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

Oil
Biodigestor

Usable
Biomass Gas Gas energy

Micro
Mangrove Pyrolysis CHP
Exploitation
Solar panels
Coal

28
DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

29
 DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

1‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 5‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Increased in treated water Increase family members self‐esteem
+ consumption .. . and better options for having a
2‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ . formal insertion into the society
Postponement or cancellation of 6‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
investments in treated water . Increase the safety of beneficiary
3‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ .communities
Improving the health of beneficiary . 7‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
communities and, consequently, a . Increase in net surplus of productive
.reduction in health corrective costs . .activities
4‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 8‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
A reduction in CO2 emissions . Reduction of negative impacts on
ecosystems
9‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Decreased work and
school absenteeism 30
 DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

Land for the Land for the

production of energy production of solar
through biomass energy
= 4,940 Ha = Ha

Power purchase agreement (PPA)

31
DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

32
DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

33
DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

34
 DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

Human Organic
consumption waste

Crops Agricultural
waste

Waste Construction
35
separation materials
 DEVELOPING SELF‐SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES

1‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
a. Release of resources by eliminating
transportation costs of volumes
 mobilized to disposal areas
3‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Increase of the useful life of
or
 the areas of final disposition

b. Improvement of health
conditions inside the
generating communities 4‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
 Release of resources for
production of ammonium sulfate
2‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
 (most common chemical fertilizer)

 Improvement of environmental
conditions
36
PROPOSALS BECOME A REALITY

Thank you
developed by: