Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full download (eTextbook PDF) for Sustainability: Global Issues, Global Perspectives by Astrid Cerny file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download (eTextbook PDF) for Sustainability: Global Issues, Global Perspectives by Astrid Cerny file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download (eTextbook PDF) for Sustainability: Global Issues, Global Perspectives by Astrid Cerny file pdf all chapter on 2024
https://ebookmass.com/product/global-problems-the-search-for-
equity-peace-and-sustainability-3rd-edition-ebook-pdf/
https://ebookmass.com/product/global-health-care-issues-and-
policies-3rd-edition-ebook-pdf/
https://ebookmass.com/product/etextbook-pdf-for-global-
banking-3rd-edition-by-roy-c-smith/
https://ebookmass.com/product/green-energy-to-sustainability-
strategies-for-global-industries-hideaki-yukawa/
The Palgrave Handbook of Global Sustainability Robert
Brinkmann
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-palgrave-handbook-of-global-
sustainability-robert-brinkmann/
https://ebookmass.com/product/feminist-theory-reader-local-and-
global-perspectives-4th-edition-ebook-pdf-version/
https://ebookmass.com/product/challenges-in-science-education-
global-perspectives-for-the-future-gregory-p-thomas/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-rural-migration-nexus-global-
problems-rural-issues-nathan-kerrigan/
https://ebookmass.com/product/global-psychology-from-indigenous-
perspectives-visions-inspired-by-k-s-yang-1st-ed-edition-louise-
sundararajan/
F I R S T E D I T I O N
SUSTAINABILITY
GLOBAL ISSUES, GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES
EDITED
BY Astrid Cerny
Bassim Hamadeh, CEO and Publisher
Michael Simpson, Vice President of Acquisitions and Sales
Jamie Giganti, Senior Managing Editor
Jess Busch, Senior Graphic Designer
John Remington, Senior Field Acquisitions Editor
Monika Dziamka, Project Editor
Brian Fahey, Licensing Specialist
Allie Kiekhofer, Interior Designer
Copyright © 2016 by Cognella, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be re-
printed, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other
means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or
in any information retrieval system without the written permission of Cognella, Inc.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and
are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION 1
CH. 1 An Introduction to Environmental Thought 3
BY BETH KINNE
SECTION 2
CHALLENGES FOR GLOBAL
SUSTAINABILITY TODAY 25
CH. 2 Energy: Changing the Rules with Efficiency and
Renewables 27
BY DARRIN MAGEE AND BETH KINNE
IV
LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES
TABLES
5.1 Greenhouses gases found in the earth’s atmosphere
5.2 Short- and long-term effects of climate change
5.3 Annual average concentrations of CO2 from 1959 to 2014
5.4 Availability of water in the Andean countries
5.5 Emissions of CO2 by Andean countries in MtCO2
FIGURES
2.1 A tree fern, a plant little changed since the time of the dinosaurs
2.2 Simplified schematic of an electric power grid and typical efficiencies
2.3 A rooftop-mounted solar hot water heater in China
2.4 Ivanpah Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) in southern California
2.5 Parkent solar furnace in Uzbekistan
2.6 Two HAWTs in New York and a dual VAWT in Taiwan
2.7 Hoover Dam in the western United States and a run-of-river hydropower
station in Japan
V
5.1 Global temperature trends
5.2 Climate attributes for the Andean Region
1 In fact, the original language (modern version) is as follows: “In all of your deliberations
in the Confederate Council, in your efforts at law making, in all your official acts, self-
interest shall be cast into oblivion. … Look and listen for the welfare of the whole people
and have always in view not only the present but also the coming generations, even those
whose faces are yet beneath the surface of the ground—the unborn of the future Nation.”
Gerald Murphy, “About the Iroquois Confederation.” Modern History Sourcebook accessed
October 27, 2014, http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/iroquois.asp.
VII
Chiefs, speaking at the Association of American Geographers conference
in New York in 2012 said, “Look to the seventh generation. When you do
that, you yourself will have peace.”
It is no coincidence that the Kazak herders and Iroquois are peoples
of Asia and North America who still today are deeply aware of the land
they inhabit. Their historical and customary rights to land and territory
were diminished by the encroachment of new settlers who asserted their
own stakes on property. Today, remaining Native American and other
native populations seek strength in numbers through the identification as
indigenous people, for which they fought 30 years to get recognition at
the United Nations. This recognition came in the form of the Declaration
of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, on September 13, 2007, adopted at
the General Assembly of the United Nations in New York. Their unique,
distinct cultures have been recognized, and their voices speak from an-
other kind of wisdom—about what it means to live an honorable life,
with respect for traditional knowledge from the generations of the past
still present in their actions today.
The length of a generation is commonly understood as 20 years. Thus,
the Kazaks know their lineage at least 140 years into the past, and the
Iroquois consider the needs of people 140 years into the future. The idea
of intergenerational equity, that which binds generations together in con-
sciousness and responsibility, is slowly gaining ground.
In 1987, a seminal document was published, also at the United
Nations, which considered environment and development as inexora-
bly linked with each other. Officially called Our Common Future, it is
also referred to as “the Brundtland Report” after its chairwoman, Gro
Harlem Brundtland (United Nations General Assembly, Report of the
World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common
Future, 1987). The effort to write this report was monumental for its
day, to select and bring to words the most pressing issues of the time,
and to articulate the anticipated wishes and needs for all of humanity on
a finite planet Earth into the future. Officially registered as a UN docu-
ment bearing the classification A/42/427, it generated many important
new international debates, and it is today, like the Constitution of the
Iroquois Confederacy, a document circulating in its entirety in the public
domain of the Internet.
Our Common Future articulated the moral and ethical obligation to
make significant changes in how we treat our oceans and atmosphere, and
how we regulate to ensure equity among generations and nations. Its most
quoted statement is the definition of sustainable development in chapter
PREFACE IX
gadgets, is increasingly becoming available to people in poorer nations
and even in the most remote regions like the Himalayan plateau and sub-
Saharan Africa is somewhat of a game changer. Cell phones allow farm-
ers to make deals with middlemen to buy the new harvest, just as these
phones allow Wall Street traders to reach their most important customers
for rapid and convenient transactions.
We appreciate the convenience of these technologies, but increasingly
we are also bearing the costs of their existence. More and more people
can see a new truth emerging. This truth is still diffuse, arising in the
consciousness of individuals such as Chief Lyons, in global political fo-
rums such as the General Assembly at the United Nations, and in research
across the sciences and social sciences.
This understanding is that humans have gone too far in taking natural
resources from Earth, and too far in putting back into the air, soil, and
water only our wastes and innumerable forms of contamination.
This book builds on the emerging understandings of sustainability as a
holistic endeavor for humanity, and that embracing sustainability, indeed
changing the paradigm of what we mean by development, is the only
way we have of handling the massive geophysical changes we are already
beginning to experience under climate change.
In this book we examine a few of the major topics of concern for
students and professionals from the Environment with a capital E, to
the very loaded term sustainability. We take a global perspective, though
of course we had to limit our scope to a reasonable page limit. This is
the first edition of a book we will expand to include more topics and
perspectives. The goal of this textbook is to provide the interested reader
with a snapshot of the dominant concerns, even major crises that we all
face together, whether they are visible to us in our immediate location or
not. Intended for classroom use and personal enjoyment in introductory
environmental, sustainability, or global studies courses, the authors share
their many years of research and their professional perspectives from a
range of academic disciplines and activist practice. In this edition, the
authors write about Mali, Mauritania, and Africa as a whole, the United
States at the state and national level, and select examples from many Latin
American, European, and Asian locations.
We discuss the major topics for sustainability, and we also intro-
duce important components for a new paradigm. We are perhaps not
revolutionary in our concepts, but we are part of the new paradigm
emerging. We posit a holistic perspective. In this book we question the
legacy of globalization and promote ideas of inclusion of people and
Astrid Cerny
Editor
REFERENCES
PREFACE XI
INTRODUCTION
N 1
TIO
C
SE
Chapter 1
AN INTRODUCTION TO
ENVIRONMENTAL THOUGHT
BY BETH KINNE
3
consume meat and vegetables at cafeterias and restaurants, purchase gro-
ceries regularly at the local market, and take showers and flush toilets,
seldom giving a thought to where that food or water came from or where
it will go after we are finished with it. The popularity of environmental
science and environmental studies as a respectable area of academic pur-
suit is growing, but our individual connections to the environment are
arguably weakening as people—particularly in the developed world—live
in increasingly dense populations of humans and their man-made arti-
facts: buildings, sidewalks, airports, shopping malls, houses. It is ironic
that as our scientific knowledge of the state of the environment grows
increasingly sophisticated, our personal relationship or direct experience
with that environment grows increasingly limited.
This is not to say that the value of individual experiences is more im-
portant than having a theoretical, big-picture understanding. It is impos-
sible to make good long-term policy decisions based solely on individual
experiences over short periods of time. For example, our understanding
of climate change is based on data collected over many decades in many
locations around the globe. Individual experiences of weather in the
short term—such as the abnormally cold winter in North America in
2014–2015—seem to contradict the longer trend of global temperature
increase, and without a more comprehensive picture could lead us to a
very different conclusion. Nevertheless, the short-term, immediate expe-
riences such as weather are still important. We have to survive today’s
hurricane or tornado, this year’s winter, in order to survive the coming
century. It is the challenge of sound environmental thinking to take both
into consideration—the immediate and the relatively far-off welfare of
ourselves, future generations, and our environment.
Like science and art, the concept of environment is not static but
changes with time, place, and individuals or groups. History, culture, and
social norms impact how people think of “the environment” and how
they perceive their relationship to it.
An appreciation for the natural world as “the environment” or “nature”
has led to innovations such as national parks. The US national park system
is a model for national park systems around the world. National parks
are areas set aside for the preservation of ecological diversity, shielded
from human intervention. But national parks are managed by people who
effectively stop natural processes from occurring in them. Park manag-
ers halt the march of invasive species; preserve specific habitats through
controlled burn regimens, and cull or encourage various populations of
animals and plants in particular places. Human intervention is still there,
1 God led the Israelites out of Egypt and into the wilderness in Exodus.
2 See Matthew 4:1, where God led Jesus into the wilderness to be tested by the devil.
3 The Israelites formed a new relationship with God while in the wilderness, for example.
8 Note that freshwater and ocean fisheries also fell victim to the same fate, but were
arguably less easy to remediate.
9 For a map of areas protected under the NWPS, see http://www.wilderness.net/map.
cfm.
10 “National Wilderness Preservation System,” The Wilderness Society, http://wilderness.
org/article/national-wilderness-preservation-system.
11 One could argue that all resources are renewable, but the time frame over which that
occurs may or may not be useful to humans. A forest that regrows in 25 years is renewable
from a human perspective; coal that might be formed millions of years from now from the
remains of these trees is not, in all practicality, renewable.
12 See “Conservation,” The US Department of Agriculture: Forest Service, http://www.
fs.fed.us/gt/local-links/historical-info/gifford/conservation.shtml.
13 “Invasive Species: What Are They and Why Are They a Problem?” National Park
Service, http://www.nature.nps.gov/biology/invasivespecies.
14 Quoted in “National Wilderness Preservation System,” The Wilderness Society,
http://wilderness.org/article/national-wilderness-preservation-system.
“It will be interesting to see whether the people who like the
somewhat over-sentimental ‘Friendship Village’ stories continue to
like Zona Gale as the far from sentimental and exceedingly skilful
author of ‘Miss Lulu Bett.’”
“To say that here also [in the conclusion] the author rises to the
occasion is simply to credit her once again with that fine and finished
art that make all her writing an abiding joy to the discriminating.” F:
T. Cooper
“The artist in her has guided her pen in careful work, and the
characters are as clearly and completely delineated as if seen on the
stage.”
+ Springf’d Republican p11a My 30 ’20
250w
The Times [London] Lit Sup p685 O 21
’20 70w
20–15149
“The Asiatic chapters, the bulk of the book, are complete enough;
they are a little too full. There is too much that is documentary, and
the vivacity of the author’s high-gaited style suffers a little, though
there is always a story or a joke to take the curse off. There is, too, a
little confusion in a treatment that takes us unawares from one
period back to an earlier without sufficient warning.”
Reviewed by W. R. Wheeler
20–6280
“In justice to Mrs Hartley I must admit that in the earlier part of
‘Women’s wild oats’ she argues for the home as against the factory.
But the second half of her book is a defense of all the things which
tend to break up the home. Even in Mrs Hartley’s early chapters the
hysterical note in her ‘womanly womanliness’ led me to expect that it
would not last.” T: Maynard
“There are those, however, who will be inclined to think that her
comparisons of English with American conditions are rather too
flattering to American life of the present day. Either that or we must
read into the English situation even darker colors than those with
which she paints it. Nevertheless hers has been a healthful effort and
should do good in clearing away some of the illusions of the
situation.” D. L. M.
“It is with some hesitation that one sets to work to criticise a book
such as ‘Women’s wild oats,’ for one wants to recognize its courage
and its sincerity, and at the same time one disagrees with certain
points of view, as one necessarily must when one is dealing with the
work which touches so many sides of a great question. One thing we
can say is that Mrs Hartley is always honest and always wise.” W. L.
George
Reviewed by K. F. Gerould
20–15339
These letters are from an uncle to his nephew, beginning when the
boy is sixteen and extending over a period of five years. They are on
puberty, with its accompanying unrest and longings, and on sex and
marital hygiene and treat these subjects with large insight, sanity and
sympathy.
20–20951
This child idyll concerns the first eight years of the latest of the
Jolyon Forsytes, whose birth was announced toward the close of the
author’s novel “In chancery.” Little Jon is a healthy and, in the words
of his mother, “loving, lovable, imaginative, sanguinary” little savage,
and, so successful in the choice of his parents that he is enabled to
live the life prompted by his dramatic instinct. The illustrations by R.
H. Sauter are a feature of the book. The story appeared in Scribner’s
magazine, November, 1920.
“The story is slight and the note of tenderness is perhaps too long
drawn out. But it throws an agreeable sidelight on the ‘Forsyte saga’
and on Mr Galsworthy’s affection for some of his creatures.” L. L.
“Since little Jon was born in 1901 it seems a safe presumption that
Mr Galsworthy’s forthcoming volume will take him up to the
threshhold of manhood. But Jon’s childhood, as here set forth, is so
charming and perfect a thing in itself that, however interesting Mr
Galsworthy may make his future career, one is almost tempted to
wish that he might remain in memory as we know him in this little
volume.”
“A few episodes in the life of a little boy of eight years old, vividly
realized and described with great charm.”
20–18929
The story is a sequel to the author’s earlier novel, “The man of
property,” and relates the further fortunes of the Forsyte family.
With one exception the possessive instinct is still strong in the male
generation, who include their wives and progeny in their property.
Soames Forsyte, after his wife, Irene, had run away with another
man lives on into middle life nursing his injuries until he poignantly
realizes that he is still without a son to inherit his fortune and his
name. Meeting Irene again, after a separation of fifteen years,
awakens the old desire to possess her, and failing of her consent,
nothing in law is too sordid for him for the attainment of a divorce.
Even the family tradition for respectability must go by the board as
he forces his cousin Jolyon—the one Forsyte that has not run true to
type—into the rôle of correspondent. At the end he marries the pretty
French girl, whom he does not love, and smothers his
disappointment at having a girl child, and no hope of another, in his
sense of proprietorship. At least—“that thing was his.”
“As a story of human persons, ‘In chancery’ should rank among his
best.” H. W. Boynton
“With grace and clearness and with a skill that holds the reader’s
attention unfailingly, the tale is told. Its accomplishment is fine and
delicate, though its convincingness is not complete.”
Reviewed by H. W. Boynton
“Once more Mr Galsworthy shows his quiet mastery, now and then
a little pontifical perhaps, but always suggesting the good rider on
the spirited horse. And once more he lights up his sober fabric with
the golden thread of beauty.”
20–9081
The book contains three plays: A bit o’ love; The foundations; The
skin game. In the first play a young clergyman, Michael Strangway, is
deserted by his wife, who returns during the first act to plead with
her husband not to divorce her out of consideration for the career of
her lover. He consents and thereby makes himself impossible with
his narrow-minded parishioners. His struggle is between his love as a
cosmic manifestation and the essence of Christianity, and his love for
the woman, his wrongs and his worldly prospects. When, at the
moment of the most hopeless desolation, he has prepared a suicide’s
noose for himself, the cry of a little child for “a bit o’ love,” and the
brave fight with his sorrow of a brother in affliction, recall him to the
world and his stronger self.
“It is sufficient of the first two, ‘A bit o’ love’ and ‘The foundations,’
to say that they are ‘good Galsworthy,’ which means that they are
more than readable and that they are beautifully constructed and
phrased. More must be said of ‘The skin game,’ the third play. It is
Galsworthy at his best.”
“Mr Galsworthy has written better plays than these, but if you care
for his plays at all you will find them worth reading.”
“Of the new plays the first, A bit of love, is undeniably the
weakest.... The skin-game has a more timeless touch. It takes the
tragicomedy of all human conflict, localizes it narrowly, embodies it
with the utmost concreteness, and yet exhausts its whole
significance. Galsworthy has never derived a dramatic action from
deeper sources in the nature of man; he has never put forth a more
far-reaching idea nor shown it more adequately in terms of flesh and
blood.” Ludwig Lewisohn
“To the reader who revolts against the rather sickly sentiment of
the first of them and who has smiled half-heartedly at the forced
comedy, in which the same sentiment still appears, in the second, the
virility and grasp of the third comes as a tonic.” S. C. C.
“These three plays will hardly add much to the fame of John
Galsworthy, although, on the other hand, enough skill and command
of character is evidenced to render them interesting additions to his
work.”
“‘A bit o’ love,’ ‘The foundations,’ and ‘The skin game’ display
ability of a high order. That fact is presumed in their authorship and
is verified in their perusal. But all three have an effect of interlude or
byplay; they are corollaries to earlier and weightier dicta.” O. W.
Firkins
20–5770
“In his earlier novels and tales there was a marked predominance
of the emotional quality over the intellectual. The two are here more
nearly in accord. With possibly one exception none of the
impressions is overwrought, or marred by sentimentality, or blurred
by loud-voiced passion. Mr Galsworthy’s restrained, softly
modulated style, as of an instrument with few overtones, wins its
effect without recourse to obvious eloquence or special pleading.” S.
C. C.
“The contents of the volume are diverse in the extreme; yet the
keynote of the whole can be expressed in one word—beauty.”
“There are pieces in this book which will probably drop out of his
collected works some decades hence. Yet we would willingly miss
none of them from the book before us. If circumstance has deprived
some of these tales and studies of the finest touch of craftsmanship
which Mr Galsworthy can give, the book as a whole is clear revelation
of one of the best and bravest minds of our time.”
“The novel is, quite simply and frankly, propaganda for the cause
of Sinn Fein. Its heroine is a vigorous, eager, impulsive, large-
hearted young woman whom the reader first sees as a gawky,
somewhat impish slip of a girl in her first teens. She gets caught in a
street fight between Orangemen and Hibernians, brought on because
some drummers of the former refuse to give way to the band heading
a procession of the others; she is knocked down, trampled and has a
narrow escape from being killed. The first thing she says when she
comes back to consciousness is to declare solemnly that she hates
both factions and thereafter will be a Fenian. To this determination
she holds with enthusiasm, becoming a Sinn Feiner when that
organization comes into activity. At one time, moved by the desire to
make a sacrifice, she enters a convent with the intention of becoming
a nun, but her desire to take part in the active measures Sinn Fein is
planning brings her out again and into the ranks of that
organization’s most ardent protagonists.”—N Y Times
Reviewed by H. W. Boynton
20–10304