Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Re-evaluating Pico: Aristotelianism, Kabbalism, and Platonism in the Philosophy of Giovanni Pico della Mirandola Sophia Howlett full chapter instant download
Re-evaluating Pico: Aristotelianism, Kabbalism, and Platonism in the Philosophy of Giovanni Pico della Mirandola Sophia Howlett full chapter instant download
https://ebookmass.com/product/re-evaluating-pico-aristotelianism-
kabbalism-and-platonism-in-the-philosophy-of-giovanni-pico-della-
mirandola-1st-ed-edition-sophia-howlett/
https://ebookmass.com/product/wittgenstein-on-logic-as-the-
method-of-philosophy-re-examining-the-roots-and-development-of-
analytic-philosophy-oskari-kuusela/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-eleventh-and-twelfth-books-of-
giovanni-villanis-new-chronicle-giovanni-villani/
https://ebookmass.com/product/virtues-of-greatness-in-the-arabic-
tradition-sophia-vasalou/
Re-Evaluating Women's Page Journalism in the Post-World
War II Era: Celebrating Soft News 1st ed. Edition
Kimberly Wilmot Voss
https://ebookmass.com/product/re-evaluating-womens-page-
journalism-in-the-post-world-war-ii-era-celebrating-soft-
news-1st-ed-edition-kimberly-wilmot-voss/
https://ebookmass.com/product/philosophy-in-the-condition-of-
modernism-ana-falcato/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-measure-of-greatness-
philosophers-on-magnanimity-sophia-vasalou/
https://ebookmass.com/product/international-law-and-the-
protection-of-climate-refugees-1st-ed-edition-giovanni-
sciaccaluga/
https://ebookmass.com/product/prince-of-fire-warriors-of-the-
fianna-book-2-sophia-nye/
CRITICAL POLITICAL THEORY AND RADICAL PRACTICE
Re-evaluating Pico
Aristotelianism, Kabbalism,
and Platonism in the Philosophy of
Giovanni Pico della Mirandola
Sophia Howlett
Critical Political Theory and Radical Practice
Series Editor
Stephen Eric Bronner
Department of Political Science
Rutgers University
New Brunswick, NJ, USA
The series introduces new authors, unorthodox themes, critical interpre-
tations of the classics and salient works by older and more established
thinkers. A new generation of academics is becoming engaged with imma-
nent critique, interdisciplinary work, actual political problems, and more
broadly the link between theory and practice. Each in this series will,
after his or her fashion, explore the ways in which political theory can
enrich our understanding of the arts and social sciences. Criminal justice,
psychology, sociology, theater and a host of other disciplines come into
play for a critical political theory. The series also opens new avenues by
engaging alternative traditions, animal rights, Islamic politics, mass move-
ments, sovereignty, and the institutional problems of power. Critical Polit-
ical Theory and Radical Practice thus fills an important niche. Innovatively
blending tradition and experimentation, this intellectual enterprise with a
political intent hopes to help reinvigorate what is fast becoming a petri-
fied field of study and to perhaps provide a bit of inspiration for future
scholars and activists.
Re-evaluating Pico
Aristotelianism, Kabbalism, and Platonism in the
Philosophy of Giovanni Pico della Mirandola
Sophia Howlett
School for International Training
Brattleboro, VT, USA
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer
Nature Switzerland AG 2021
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the
Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights
of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on
microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and
retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology
now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc.
in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such
names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for
general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and informa-
tion in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither
the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with
respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been
made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps
and institutional affiliations.
This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature
Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Preface
Pico has been an interesting journey. I had written about Pico a little
before while preparing my dissertation in the early 1990s. But then I had
understood Pico as Ficino’s disciple, and part of the Platonic Academy
of Florence. I had not spent time with the broader critical material
of what I call here, ‘Pico Studies,’ which tends to avoid Ficino alto-
gether. Coming back to Pico, everything had changed, from the Platonic
Academic concept itself to the direction of ‘Pico Studies’ away from a
focus on the ‘Dignity of Man’ (here referred to as the Oration) toward the
impact of Kabbalism. I was also confused by the level of interest in Pico
particularly in his homeland and France. As primarily a Ficino scholar, I
had understood Ficino as ‘the titan’ and Pico as a relatively minor satellite
(particularly because of his incomplete career). Of course, the Oration was
an important text, but as a short expression of philosophical optimism,
rather than the magnum opus of Ficino’s Platonic Theology. Yet it seemed
that in popular culture many had heard of Pico, not so many of Ficino.
So, part of the project became to understand Pico’s allure, introducing
the theme of exceptionalism.
After most of the research was complete, I had decided this book would
focus on the theme of syncretism. An inevitable decision, no doubt, if
trying to provide an overview of Pico’s philosophy. But then there was a
halt. I was appointed to the leadership role at the School for International
Training in Vermont. Returning to the writing process this past year, I
realized that my relationship with Pico had become rather complicated:
v
vi PREFACE
highly judgmental, if not critical. During the research, I had come to see
Pico in a very different way from our first introduction in the 1990s, and
I was now forced to build some distance into the relationship. What had
originated as a project to introduce Pico to a wider audience in the US and
UK, rapidly became a reevaluation, including a comparison with Ficino.
As with any academic endeavor, we stand on the work of others. In
Pico’s case, there has been so much interesting new work in the twenty-
first century, particularly on his use of Kabbalism and Kabbalistic sources.
The work of the Pico Project group (Pier Cesare Bori, Michael Papio,
Massimo Riva, and Francesco Borghese, among others), of those working
on Pico’s Kabbalistic Library (led by Giulio Busi and Michele Ciliberto),
and of Moshe Idel and Brian Copenhaver has been particularly inspiring.
When I started working on my dissertation in the UK, writing about
Kabbalism seemed difficult, as if one would not be taken seriously as a
scholar. Scholars such as Scholem, Idel, Wirszubski, Busi, and Copen-
haver have transformed that conversation. There are more new editions
coming soon; and a lot more to explore. Indeed, now we have moved
beyond a focus on the dignity of man, the multiplicity of Pico’s sources
combined with the brevity of his existing works makes ‘Pico studies’
even more alluring. We are faced with pages of puzzles, and the constant
promise of real answers just out of present reach. Finishing a work, writing
this preface, inevitably makes me appreciate how much more there is to
explore.
I would like to thank my friend and colleague, Prof. Stephen Bronner
of Rutgers University, for suggesting that I work on another piece for the
Critical Theory series. My thanks go to the librarians of Kean University,
where the main research for this work was conducted, and those of SIT.
And my colleagues at School for International Training, for leaving me a
few hours on a Sunday (sometimes, not always!) to put the research into
a coherent text.
1 Introduction 1
A Contested Site 1
Pico’s Contribution 5
vii
viii CONTENTS
7 Conclusion 209
Index 233
About the Author
Sophia Howlett obtained her M.A. from Cambridge University and her
Ph.D. from the Medieval Studies Center of York University in the United
Kingdom. Her field of expertise is Renaissance Philosophy and Litera-
ture, most recently publishing Marsilio Ficino and His World (Palgrave
Macmillan, 2016). She taught at York University, was a permanent
lecturer at the University of Teesside, and a visiting professor at the
National University of Kiev Mohyla Academy, the National University of
Kyiv, Taras Shevchenko and Kaliningrad State University, before moving
to Central European University in Budapest, Hungary, as a dean and
professor in the twin fields of literature/philosophy and comparative and
international higher education policy. During this time, she was an Open
Society Institute fellow and a visiting scholar at Harvard. In 2012, Dr.
Howlett moved to Kean University, New Jersey as associate vice-president
for academic affairs, and then in 2017 was appointed as president of
School for International Training (SIT) in Vermont.
ix
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
A Contested Site
Pico della Mirandola was a late fifteenth-century Italian nobleman-
philosopher with an interest in religious reform who died young under
mysterious circumstances. He is part of a milieu that we quickly recognize
when we think of the Italian Renaissance whether historically or within
the history of ideas. Pico lived and worked in places such as Florence,
Padua, and Ferrara. He was friends with the great Platonist Marsilio
Ficino, with the humanist and poet Angelo Poliziano, and the major Aris-
totelian reformers of his generation such as Augustino Nifo as well as the
eminence grise of Christian reform, Girolamo Savonarola. He was close to
Lorenzo de’ Medici, the Estes, the Sforzas, probably the King of France,
and famously feuded with the pope. Pico’s use of Jewish Kabbalism intro-
duced a new and ongoing strand to Christian esoterica. Obviously, Pico
is so much more than this—but beyond basic facts, the story of Pico and
his intellectual legacy is highly contested.
Indeed, the level of Pico’s fame in Italy and France both then and now
sometimes seems out of proportion to his limited output with multiple
grandiose characterizations, whether in popular culture or academia: Pico
the hero philosopher-prince,1 the count with the miraculous memory;
St. Pico, the nobleman-penitent who gave everything away to die closer
to God; in academic circles, Pico the lone genius whose work prefigures
the modern individual: the philosopher who requires us to understand
would have done so. The tension between his ambitions, his religiosity,
and the mystical asceticism of his philosophy was present throughout
his career—he started by wanting a public voice and was ambitious to
make a big impact, but his philosophical approach was turned inward, was
highly personalized, and eschewed communion with others. He became
increasingly involved with religious reformers, including Savonarola, but
whatever his religious beliefs, or vision of an ascetic life, it was ‘not
yet.’ St. Pico was a construct of Gianfrancesco’s biography, Savonarola’s
attempted appropriation of his famous friend, and a history of reception
particularly through Thomas More.
Pico’s Contribution
While there is much to set aside or re-examine, re-evaluation predomi-
nantly offers a new sense of Pico’s contribution to the history of thought.
He is working at a specific time and place. This is a time of intellectual
excitement generated by an influx of new ideas and old texts. Old texts
‘return’ to the Latin world during the collapse of the Byzantine Empire.
Refugees, particularly from the Eastern Empire, bring access to Greek,
Hebrew, and Arabic language. The rise of publishing supports dissem-
ination of ideas and literacy encouraging a ‘return to text’ for biblical
sources too, rather than reliance on church doctrine. But it was also (and
it is difficult to know how much cause and effect may have been in play)
a time of general anxiety in northern and central Italy around the end of
the fifteenth century, with a consequent desire for change.8
Pico is surrounded by philosophical and spiritual revivals based on a
‘return to text’: he studies with the leaders of the Aristotelian Recovery,
works throughout his life with Marsilio Ficino, responsible for the
Platonic revival, and is friends with a variety of Christian reformers. He
is surrounded by a desire for a new world based on growing anxiety and
discontent with the old. This was not just a question of scholarship or
theology. In Pico’s time, and partly through his agency, a Christian reform
movement under the Dominican friar, Girolamo Savonarola, temporarily
took over Florentine politics. Nineteen years after Savonarola was burnt
as a heretic, Luther would publish his theses resulting in reformation and
the splintering of the Catholic Church. These movements share many of
the same characteristics and are born out of the same impetus: something
has gone wrong, or we have taken a wrong turn, and we can make it
better. For the optimistic, a new Golden Age could be born out of crisis;
6 S. HOWLETT
for the less so, the times required penitence and asceticism—a theocracy
based on our sense of sin.
Whatever his distinctive vision, Pico was also very much part of this
milieu. He spent time in environments that fostered the primary intel-
lectual movements of his era: whether the Aristotelians of Padua, the
Platonist of Florence, or the proponents of the via moderna (the new
branch of scholasticism) in Paris. He attempted a revival of both philos-
ophy and theology at the center of church power in Rome. He was
responsible for bringing Savonarola to Florence, and for unclear reasons,
he was possibly mysteriously murdered—poisoned at a crisis point in
Florence’s history as the King of France was marching into the city. But he
was never part of any of these movements, philosophical groups, or reli-
gious orders. Rather he brought together Aristotelianism, Platonism and
Kabbalism with his Christianity in a distinctive mix that set him ultimately
outside of those with whom he connected. He was on a different journey.
But characteristically, he combined Golden Age thinking, the sense of a
crisis, and the ascetic sensibility into his work.
For example, the closest point of comparison, Marsilio Ficino, is very
much part of the collective desire for change. He was on a mission to
renew the world: he sets out a blueprint for us to renew ourselves (a
mystical path) in order to reform the world (an active path as the inspired
magus ). He saw himself as at the center of this new potential community,
that he would lead. He spoke often in the plural—which is one of the
reasons why the phrase ‘academy’ is so often used in his work. Pico is
part of this desire for change too, but for him, this was a journey of
the self: an ascetic, personal journey of the individual soul developing its
relationship to God. He provided a blueprint for the journey upward,
but with no second step of return and reform. He certainly wanted, or
originally wanted, to change his world, but through the provision and
pursuit of his ideas, rather than the accrual and use of special abilities
derived from touching the mind of God.
Ficino uses the generic ‘man’ to talk about the movement upward to
God (though ‘man’ is ultimately part of a collective—groups of char-
iots, the entourage of a particular planet, riding up to the firmament).
But Ficino also has a way back. He wants to be the new Socrates: he
wants to lead everybody else. Pico describes a lonely journey upward to
God, and then…. Who knows? The end point appears to be death. His
proposed new approach was not then the rebirth of a Golden Age, though
he may have supported others’ work to this end, but the achievement of
1 INTRODUCTION 7
his version of henosis : the route to achieve communion and finally assim-
ilation with God. He laid down the path of the mystic. An ascetic path.
He engages in the milieu of community anxiety at multiple levels, but
perhaps ultimately his anxiety is teleological: he is not looking for rebirth
or revival, but an ending.
Meanwhile, Pico worked to build his career and live up to his own
promise as the ‘prince of concord’: bringing faith and reason, theology
and philosophy, back together9 ; bringing the allegorical ‘truths’ of litera-
ture into the mix; and establishing a new foundation for philosophy. This
was an ambitious agenda especially as that sense of division (faith from
reason, for example) was very much part of the general anxiety. The next
chapter will introduce that career and his agenda through the key works
that survived him, presenting them as a mainly coherent and contiguous
oeuvre. Chapters 3 and 4 introduce his three pillars within the context of
their history and the broader intellectual movements of his day, including
an introduction to his academic entourage. Inevitably, Kabbalism, an
unusual addition to a work on philosophy, requires longer introduction.
It has also become an important focus of contemporary scholarship on
Pico. Research on Pico’s Kabbalistic sources and the introduction of
Jewish scholars, among others, to Pico criticism has allowed what used to
be a peripheral topic, difficult to touch as Christian esoterica, to become
much more central to our understanding of his work. Finally, Chapters 5
and 6 examine his vision in detail: first from a metaphysical perspective;
and secondly as the journey of the individual soul to Pico’s specific form
of henosis .
There will always be mysteries around Pico, and the contortions he
makes to bring together the three traditions on which he primarily relies
are not always persuasive. But in bringing the history of thought as he
knew it into conversation with itself, Pico challenges us and opens debate
even as he aims to resolve conflict. A story of concord is ultimately also
a story of ruptures. Perhaps this is his final contribution. He interrogated
philosophical traditions, made clear those ruptures, the disconnects, and
provoked further questions even as he attempted to consolidate. The final
piece of Pico’s legacy ironically is what is unresolved: those questions that
arise as he pushes us to look ‘otherwise.’
8 S. HOWLETT
Notes
1. For example: ‘He was the raw material of a poet, lacking in literary gift yet
possessed of an inherent poetry of mind and character that illumines his life
and breaks in veiled flashes through the inchoate clouds of his learning.’
Robb (1935, 2).
2. Garin (1972, 211) citing an eyewitness account: ‘On a trip to Ferrara in
the company of the Cardinal of Aragon, the papal legate, I saw there this
youth, who, although yet a novice, was clad in the robes of a protonotary
and, to the profound admiration of the audience, was engaged in a debate
with Leonardo Nugarolo.’
3. Pico, Commentary (1986, 80).
4. The overall narrative arc of a person’s ‘complete works’ or central vision
is normally seen from the distance of a lengthy career: what remained
important, what remained central, where did the hallmarks of an original
viewpoint begin? What occurred before that point is then juvenilia: opin-
ions that are interesting and can allow insight into the developing mind
but can also be dispensed with given later work. We can also discern stages
to the career: genuine changes of viewpoint. With Pico, we cannot tell if or
what might be juvenilia, and due to the interventions of those who shaped
his legacy, we have no definitive external evidence of whether he might
have been changing viewpoint around the time of his death. The direct
result of these problems is that we are left with a series of short pieces,
drafts, and letters, that may or may not be consistent as a body of work,
may or may not represent views that changed later, may or may not be
part of larger ambitious works. But as I will explore throughout this book,
there really is a large degree of consistency across his lifetime, sufficient to
be able to put these works together to form at least a partial picture of his
vision. Viewpoints from other critics differ, for example, Garin who argues
that ‘Attempts to unify his short and fragmented career produced “bias
and distortions” – like the “alleged supremacy” of Kabbalah.’ (according
to Copenhaver 2019, 127), or Valcke (2005, 377) who argues that Pico
died too young to have a systematic philosophy, while Papio (2012, 92)
suggests that a ‘profound change in Pico’s attitude took place after the
failure of the projected disputation in Rome,’ specifically that he is more
apologetic about his use of non-Christian sources.
5. Farmer (1998, 11 n30): Pico used the spelling, Cabala, but I will use
Kabbalah/Kabbalism throughout.
6. Pico, Oration (2012, 186–87): ‘And I say all these things (not without the
deepest grief and indignation) not against the lords of our times but against
the philosophers who believe and openly declare that no one should pursue
philosophy if only because there is no market for philosophers, no remuner-
ation given to them, as if they did not reveal in this very word that they are
1 INTRODUCTION 9
not true philosophers. Hence insofar as their whole life has been dedicated
to moneymaking and ambition they are incapable of embracing the knowl-
edge of truth for its own sake.’ (‘Quae omnia ego non sine summo dolore
et indignatione in huius temporis non principes, sed philosophos dico, qui
ideo non esse philosophandum et credunt et praedicant, quod philosophis
nulla merces, nulla sint praemia constituta; quasi non ostendant ipsi, hoc
uno nomine, se non esse philosophos, quod cum tota eorum vita sit vel
in questu, vel in ambitione posita, ipsam per se veritatis cognitionem non
amplectuntur.’)
7. Pico, Oration (2012, 186–87 n184) Pico’s letter to Andrea Corneo:
‘Would it therefore be ignoble or wholly improper for a nobleman gratu-
itously to pursue wisdom?… No one who has practiced philosophy in such
a way as to be able or unable to do so has ever truly been a philosopher.
Such a man has engaged in commerce, not philosophy.’
8. Garin (1983, 77): ‘the atmosphere of the 1480s and 1490s… was full of
hermetic prophetism, of eschatological statements on the overthrow (de
eversione) or the approach of Antichrist (de adventu Antichristi), no less
than on renewal (de renovatio) and new eras, between conjunctions and
fatal changes. These are the years of Mercurio da Correggio’s hermetic
prediction, and of Arquato’s famous prophecy of the “destruction of
Europe”.’
9. Borghesi (2012, 62) argues that his aim was to build a new theology out
of the past: ‘This “new” theology would be superior to those already in
existence because it would give a richer understanding of Christian truths.’
CHAPTER 2
What has just been said foreshadows the method in which the
subject in hand is to be here examined, and the present article
naturally divides itself into two sections—the first considering the
coexistence of anatomical alterations occurring in the cerebral
substance with syphilitic affections of the brain-membranes or blood-
vessels, the second being a clinical study of syphilitic insanity.
In looking over the literature of the subject I have found the following
cases in which a cerebral sclerotic affection coincided with a
gummatous disease of the membrane. Gros and Lancereaux60
report a case having a clear syphilitic history in which the dura mater
was adherent to the skull. The pia mater was not adherent. Beneath,
upon the vault of the brain, was a gelatinous exudation. The upper
cerebral substance was indurated, and pronounced by Robin after
microscopic examination to be sclerosed. At the base of the brain
there were atheromatous arteries and spots of marked softening.
60 Affec. Nerv. Syphilis, 1861, p. 245.
Reporter
No. Symptoms. Results.—Remarks.
and Journal.
1 Luis Epilepsy, delirium of exaltation, alteration of Rapid cure with mercury.
Streisand speech, headache, failure of memory.
Die Lues als
Ursache der
Dementia,
Inaug. Diss.,
Berlin, 1878.
2 Ibid. Delusions, delirium, general mania, great Cure with mercury.
muscular weakness.
3 Müller of Symptoms resembling general paralysis, and Cure by iodide of
Leutkirch diagnosis of such made until a sternal node potassium.
Journ. of was discovered.
Mental Dis.,
1873–74,
561.
4 Esmarch Sleeplessness, great excitement, restlessness, Cure by mercury.
and W. great activity, incoherence, and violence.
Jersen
Allgem.
Zeitschrift f.
Psychiatrie.
5 Leidesdorf Complete mania; played with his excrement, Complete cure by iodide
Medizin. and entirely irrational. of potassium.
Jahrbucher,
xx., 1864, 1.
6 Beauregard Symptoms resembling those of general Cure by iodide of
Gaz. paralysis. potassium.
hébdom. de
Sci. méd. de
Bordeaux,
1880, p. 64.
7 M. Rendu Loss of memory, headache, irregularity of Mercurial treatment, cure.
Ibid. pupils, ambitious delirium, periods of
excitement, others of depression,
embarrassment of speech, access of furious
delirium, ending in stupor.
8 M. Rendu Hypochondria, irregularity of pupils, headache, Mercurial treatment, cure.
Gaz. failure of memory, melancholy, stupor.
hébdom. de
Sci. méd. de
Bordeaux,
1880, p. 64.
9 Albrecht Melancholia with hypochondriasis, Iodide of potassium, cure.
Erlenmeyer sleeplessness, fear of men, and belief they
Die were all leagued against him.
Luëtischen
Psychosen,
Neuwied,
1877.
10 Ibid. Religious melancholia, with two attempts at Iodide of potassium, cure.
suicide, ending in mania.
11 Ibid. At times very violent, yelling, shrieking, Iodide of potassium, cure.
destroying everything she could get hands on,
at times erotomania; no distinct history of
infection, but her habits known to be bad, and
had bone ozæna and other physical syphilitic
signs.
12 Ibid. Epileptic attack followed by a long soporose Cured by mercurial
condition, ending in mental confusion, he not inunction.
knowing his nearest friends, etc.; almost
dementia.
13 Ibid. Great fear of gensd'armes, etc., mania, with Cured by mercurial
hallucinations, loud crying, yelling, etc., then inunctions with iodide
convulsion, followed by great difficulty of internally; subsequently
speech. return of convulsions,
followed by hemiplegia
and death.
14 Ibid. Great unnatural vivacity and loquacity, wanted Iodide of potassium, cure.
to buy everything, bragged of enormous gains Attended to business,
at play, etc.; some trouble of speech. and seems as well as
before. Relapsed. (See
Symptoms.)
Ibid. Fifteen months after discharge from asylum Failure of various anti-
Relapse of relapse; symptoms developing very rapidly, specific treatment.
Case 14. delirium of grandeur of the most aggravated
type, with marked progressive dementia, failure
of power of speech, and finally of locomotion.
15 A. Failure of mental powers, inequality of pupils, Iodide of potassium in
Erlenmeyer trembling of lip when speaking, uncertainty of ascending doses failed.
Die gait, almost entire loss of memory, once Recovery under mercurial
Luëtischen, temporary ptosis and strabismus. inunctions.
etc.
16 Ibid. Failure of mental powers, pronounced delirium Iodide of potassium,
of grandeur, hallucinations of hearing, failure of corrosive-sublimate
memory, strabismus and ptosis coming on late. injections. Cure.
17 Ibid. Failure of memory and mental powers, slight Cure with use of iodide
ideas of grandeur, disturbance of sensibility and mercurial inunctions.
and motility, aphasia coming on late.
18 Ibid. Melancholy, great excitability, ideas of Iodide of potassium
grandeur; after a long time sudden ptosis and failed; mercurial course
strabismus. improved; joint use cured
patient.
19 Ibid. Various cerebral nerve palsies, great relief by
use of mercurial inunctions, then development
of great excitement, delirium of grandeur,
failure of memory and mental powers, and
finally death from apoplexy; no autopsy.
20 J. B. Chapin Melancholia with attempted suicide, epilepsy, Iodide of potassium, cure.
Amer. Journ. headache, somnolent spells.
Insanity, vol.
xv. p. 249.
21 Ibid. Acute mania, noisy, very destructive; syphilitic Iodide of potassium, cure.
disease of tibia.
22 Snel Maniacal excitement. Cured by specific
treatment.
23 Wm. Smith Apathetic melancholy, indelicate, speaking only Rapidly cured by conjoint
Brit. Med. in monosyllables, and much of the time not at use of iodide and
Journ., July, all, sullen and menacing. mercurials. The
1868, p. 30. symptoms first developed
3 months after chancre.
A study of the brief analyses of the symptoms just given shows that
syphilitic disease of the brain may cause any form of mania, but that
the symptoms, however various they may be at first, end almost
always in dementia unless relieved.
70 Loc. cit.
When the conditions in any case correspond with the characters just
paragraphed, or when any of the distinguishing characteristics of
brain syphilis, as previously given, are present, the probability is that
the disorder is specific and remediable. But the absence of these
marks of specific disease is not proof that the patient is not suffering
from syphilis. Headache may be absent in cerebral syphilis, as also
may insomnia and somnolence. Epileptiform attacks are not always
present in the pseudo-paralysis, and may be present in the genuine
affection; a review of the cases previously tabulated shows that in
several of them the megalomania was most pronounced; and a case
with very pronounced delirium of grandeur, in which the autopsy
revealed unquestionably specific brain lesions, may be found in
Chauvet's Thesis, p. 31.
Spinal Syphilis.
Tumors of the brain occur oftener among men than women. This fact
is dependent largely upon the difference between the habits and
occupations of the two sexes. Men, in the first place, are much more
addicted to alcoholic, venereal, and other abuses which give rise to
special degenerations or constitutional infection; and secondly, they
are more exposed to traumatisms. In 100 cases the tumors occurred
among males in 58 cases, among females in 40 cases, and sex was
not recorded in 2 cases.