Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full download Memories in the Service of the Hindu Nation: The Afterlife of the Partition of India Kohli file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download Memories in the Service of the Hindu Nation: The Afterlife of the Partition of India Kohli file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download Memories in the Service of the Hindu Nation: The Afterlife of the Partition of India Kohli file pdf all chapter on 2024
https://ebookmass.com/product/philanthropy-and-the-development-
of-modern-india-in-the-name-of-nation-arun-kumar/
https://ebookmass.com/product/vajpayee-the-ascent-of-the-hindu-
right-1924-1977-abhishek-choudhary/
https://ebookmass.com/product/in-the-shadow-of-the-birth-of-a-
nation-racism-reception-and-resistance-melvyn-stokes/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-refugee-woman-partition-of-
bengal-genderand-the-political-paulomi-chakraborty/
Recollection in the Republics: Memories of the British
Civil Wars in England, 1649-1659 Imogen Peck
https://ebookmass.com/product/recollection-in-the-republics-
memories-of-the-british-civil-wars-in-england-1649-1659-imogen-
peck/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-afterlife-of-anne-boleyn-
representations-of-anne-boleyn-in-fiction-and-on-the-screen-1st-
ed-edition-stephanie-russo/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-unfinished-nation-a-concise-
history-of-the-american-people/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-new-cambridge-history-of-india-
volume-1-part-1-the-portuguese-in-india-m-n-pearson/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-nation-form-in-the-global-age-
irfan-ahmad/
Memories in the Service of the
Hindu Nation
Memories in the Service of the Hindu Nation is based on 14 months of
ethnographic fieldwork in Delhi and its surroundings between 2017 and
2018 with Partition survivors from west Punjab and the North-West Frontier
Province. It locates the global rise of far-right nationalism within
globalisation and memories of victimhood. Focusing on Hindu nationalism
in India, this book is an important and timely contribution to the literature
on South Asian Partition Studies that shows how tragedy begets tragedy. It
tries to answer an urgent, provocative but nevertheless necessary question:
What does it mean to remember the Partition in the time of fascism?
The author shows what makes up cycles of violence by connecting the
reinscription of trauma in Partition memories to the self-serving justifications
of the contemporary violence of Hindu nationalism. It analyses how the
hegemony of Hindu nationalism has structured the narratives of Hindu
Partition survivors and recruited them in the service of a putative Hindu
nation.
South Asia has become a laboratory for devising new institutions and
practices of modern social life. Forms of capitalist enterprise, providing
welfare and social services, the public role of religion, the management of
ethnic conflict, popular culture and mass democracy in the countries of the
region have shown a marked divergence from known patterns in other parts
of the world. South Asia is now being studied for its relevance to the general
theoretical understanding of modernity itself.
South Asia in the Social Sciences will feature books that offer innovative
research on contemporary South Asia. It will focus on the place of the region
in the various global disciplines of the social sciences and highlight research
that uses unconventional sources of information and novel research
methods. While recognising that most current research is focused on the
larger countries, the series will attempt to showcase research on the smaller
countries of the region.
General Editor
Partha Chatterjee
Columbia University
Editorial Board
Pranab Bardhan
University of California at Berkeley
Stuart Corbridge
Durham University
Satish Deshpande
University of Delhi
Christophe Jaffrelot
Centre d’etudes et de recherches internationales, Paris
Nivedita Menon
Jawaharlal Nehru University
Other books in the series:
Government as Practice: Democratic Left in a Transforming India
Dwaipayan Bhattacharyya
Courting the People: Public Interest Litigation in Post-Emergency India
Anuj Bhuwania
Development after Statism: Industrial Firms and the Political Economy of
South Asia
Adnan Naseemullah
Politics of the Poor: Negotiating Democracy in Contemporary India
Indrajit Roy
Nationalism, Development and Ethnic Conflict in Sri Lanka
Rajesh Venugopal
South Asian Governmentalities: Michel Foucault and the Question of
Postcolonial Orderings
Stephen Legg and Deana Heath (eds.)
Adivasis and the State: Subalternity and Citizenship in India’s Bhil
Heartland
Alf Gunvald Nilsen
Maoist People’s War and the Revolution of Everyday Life in Nepal
Ina Zharkevich
New Perspectives on Pakistan’s Political Economy: State, Class and Social
Change
Matthew McCartney and S. Akbar Zaidi (eds.)
Crafty Oligarchs, Savvy Voters: Democracy under Inequality in Rural
Pakistan
Shandana Khan Mohmand
Dynamics of Caste and Law: Dalits, Oppression and Constitutional
Democracy in India
Dag-Erik Berg
Simultaneous Identities: Language, Education and the Nepali Nation
Uma Pradhan
Deceptive Majority: Dalits, Hinduism, and Underground Religion
Joel Lee
Colossus: The Anatomy of Delhi
Sanjoy Chakravorty and Neelanjan Sircar (eds.)
When Ideas Matter: Democracy and Corruption in India
Bilal A. Baloch
In Search of Home: Citizenship, Law and the Politics of the Poor
Kaveri Haritas
Bureaucratic Archaeology: State, Science, and Past in Postcolonial India
Ashish Avikunthak
Political Economy of the Development of Bangladesh
K. A. S. Murshid
An Uneasy Hegemony: Politics of State-building and Struggles for Justice in
Sri Lanka
Shyamika Jayasundara-Smits
Founding Mothers of the Indian Republic: Gender Politics of the Framing of
the Constitution
Achyut Chetan
Freedom in Captivity: Negotiations of Belonging along Kashmir’s Frontier
Radhika Gupta
Memories in the Service of
the Hindu Nation
The Afterlife of the Partition of India
Pranav Kohli
Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8EA, United Kingdom
One Liberty Plaza, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10006, USA
477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia
314–321, 3rd Floor, Plot No. 3, Splendor Forum, Jasola District Centre, New Delhi 110025, India
103 Penang Road, #05–06/07, Visioncrest Commercial, Singapore 238467
www.cambridge.org
Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9781009318686
© Pranav Kohli 2023
This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions
of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take
place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press & Assessment.
List of Figures xi
Acknowledgements xiii
Glossary 327
References 334
Index364
Figures
There are a number of people to whom thanks are due. First and foremost,
to my mom: thank you for being the best sociological mom ever! You are
the best!
To Choti Nani and my family in Faridabad – Nani Masi, Tony mamu,
Poonam mami and Sagar bhaiya – thank you for taking care of me during
my fieldwork. None of this would have been possible without your
kindness, hospitality, care and generosity. Thanks are also due to my
extended family who helped me in various ways, including my search for
informants.
To my informants, thank you for opening up your homes and hearts to
me. You are my kin and ancestors, and I will always love and respect you. I
will keep you alive in writing and memory. Thanks are also due to Mr and
Mrs Adlakha for assisting me in my search for informants.
To my PhD supervisor, Thomas Strong, thank you for everything. You
have been an inspiring mentor and role model, an exemplar of the kind of
engaged anthropologist I aspire to be.
Thanks are also due to Chandana Mathur, Steve Coleman and Andrew
Finlay for having been my supervisors at different stages of my academic
journey. Your spirit animates this monograph. Thanks also to Peter van der
Veer for his invaluable feedback as the external examiner of my PhD thesis.
I bear the memory of passing my viva with zero corrections, with honour.
Thanks are also due to my academic colleagues Eamonn Slater, John Brown
and Barry Cannon for their advice and timely pep-talks at various stages of
the publication process.
xiv Acknowledgements
Thanks are also due to my whimsical Irish foster parents Ela and
Michael Kennedy; to my friends Adeen Solaiman, Mahvish Khan, Miriam
Teehan, Sara O’Rourke, Danielle Ng, Maire Ni Mhordha, and to my fellow
Reading Room Rats (especially Gabriella for the lifetime free Dropbox
space). A special thanks to Sherin and Nitin Williams – my family in
Helsinki – for their feedback on the final draft of this manuscript.
Thanks also to Romila Thapar, Tanika Sarkar, Urvashi Butalia and
Nonica Datta for taking the time to talk to me during my fieldwork. Thank
you for inspiring me with your work and words.
Thanks are due to Maynooth University, whose John and Pat Hume
Doctoral Studentship supported my PhD studies.
Last but not least, thanks to my editors Anwesha Rana and Qudsiya
Ahmed, to series editor Partha Chatterjee, the members of the series
editorial board and the three anonymous peer reviewers for believing in
this project.
Prologue
The Linguistic Setting
this reason that detailing the ethnic and linguistic setting of my research
gains added relevance.
Being a third-generation Partition migrant, my connection to the
Partition is deeply intimate. Delhi was the obvious site for my fieldwork
because my family’s Partition survivors and their friends are settled
there. This personal connection is visible throughout my research,
shaping my search for informants as well as my engagement with
theory. Due to the snowballing nature of my search for informants – that
branched out into the kith and kin networks of my family’s elders – all
of my informants hail from the Derajat region and the North-West
Frontier Province. All my informants were aged 80 and above at the time
of interviews (2017–2018). Most of the people who find a mention in
this book were close to 85 years of age. Roughly two-thirds of my
informants happened to be men, an accident of social relations. All of
my informants were upper-caste, middle-class and Hindu. They belonged
to a mix of castes such as Khatri, Arora, Bhatia, Malik and Brahmin.1 All
of them came from well-off zamindar families. Quite a few even owned
businesses in addition to hereditary land titles.
The stories I have documented here tell the story of the Partition as
it unfolded in this north-western region of Pakistan. The Derajat region
is located in the area where the Pakistani provinces of Punjab,
Balochistan and Khyber-Pakhtunkhawa (formerly North-West Frontier
Province) meet. The Derajat region is identified as a culturally distinct
region, partly due to the fact that it is home to the Saraiki language. The
historical districts of Dera Ghazi Khan, Dera Ismail Khan, Quetta,
Mianwali and Multan are most closely associated with the Derajat
region and the Saraiki language (Hashmi and Majeed 2014). However,
as my informants continuously reminded me, Saraiki is something of an
umbrella term for the closely related dialects of Derawali, Mianwali-boli
(or Mianwali dialect) and Multani. These dialects also bear a close
resemblance to Punjabi. Today, Saraiki is the major language of this
region (in Pakistan) and is spoken by approximately 25–40 million
people (Hashmi and Majeed 2014).
North-west of the Derajat region, in the North-West Frontier
Province, the main languages spoken were Pashto, Persian and Urdu.
My informants from Bannu and other remote parts of this province saw
themselves as neither Saraiki nor Punjabi, but as Pashtuns and/or
Prologue 3
Note
1 I have not mentioned the specific castes of specific informants in their
introductions as part of persistent efforts to preserve their anonymity.
Some of my informants shared their last name with the name of their
caste (for example, Arora and Bhatia). I have therefore used the
somewhat generalising gloss of ‘upper-caste’ with a twofold objective:
to make the caste dynamics at play intelligible to a larger non-South
Asian non-specialist audience and to obscure biographical details.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
criterion, I may mention his separation of the sulphates of baryta and
strontia, which had 323 previously been confounded. Among crystals
which in the collections were ranked together as “heavy spar,” and
which were so perfect as to admit of accurate measurement, he
found that those which were brought from Sicily, and those of
Derbyshire, differed in their cleavage angle by three degrees and a
half. “I could not suppose,” he says, 22 “that this difference was the
effect of any law of decrement; for it would have been necessary to
suppose so rapid and complex a law, that such an hypothesis might
have been justly regarded as an abuse of the theory.” He was,
therefore, in great perplexity. But a little while previous to this,
Klaproth had discovered that there is an earth which, though in many
respects it resembles baryta, is different from it in other respects;
and this earth, from the place where it was found (in Scotland), had
been named Strontia. The French chemists had ascertained that the
two earths had, in some cases, been mixed or confounded; and
Vauquelin, on examining the Sicilian crystals, found that their base
was strontia, and not, as in the Derbyshire ones, baryta. The riddle
was now read; all the crystals with the larger angle belong to the
one, all those with the smaller, to the other, of these two sulphates;
and crystallometry was clearly recognized as an authorized test of
the difference of substances which nearly resemble each other.
22 Traité, ii. 320.
Unfortunately Romé de Lisle and Haüy were not only rivals, but in
some measure enemies. The former might naturally feel some
vexation at finding himself, in his later years (he died in 1790),
thrown into shade by his more brilliant successor. In reference to
Haüy’s use of cleavage, he speaks 23 of “innovators in
crystallography, who may properly be called crystalloclasts.” Yet he
adopted, in great measure, the same views of the formation of
crystals by laminæ, 24 which Haüy illustrated by the destructive
process at which he thus sneers. His sensitiveness was kept alive by
the conduct of the Academy of Sciences, which took no notice of him
and his labors; 25 probably because it was led by Buffon, who
disliked Linnæus, and might dislike Romé as his follower; and who,
as we have seen, despised crystallography. Haüy revenged himself
by rarely mentioning Romé in his works, though it was manifest that
his obligations to him were immense; and by recording his errors
while he corrected them. More fortunate than his rival, Haüy was,
from the first, received with favor and applause. His lectures at Paris
were eagerly listened to by persons from all quarters of the world.
His views were, in this manner, speedily diffused; and the subject
was soon pursued, in various ways, by mathematicians and
mineralogists in every country of Europe.
23 Pref. p. xxvii.
24 T. ii. p. 21.
Nor need I dwell long on those who added to the knowledge which
Haüy left, of derived forms. The most remarkable work of this kind
was that of Count Bournon, who published a work on a single
mineral (calcspar) in three quarto volumes. 27 He has here given
representations of seven hundred forms of crystals, of which,
however, only fifty-six are essentially different. From this example the
reader may judge what a length of time, and what a number of
observers and calculators, were requisite to exhaust the subject.
27 Traité complet de la Chaux Carbonatée et d’Aragonite, par M.
le Comte de Bournon. London, 1808.
If the calculations, thus occasioned, had been conducted upon the
basis of Haüy’s system, without any further generalization, they
would have belonged to that process, the natural sequel of inductive
discoveries, which we call deduction; and would have needed only a
very brief notice here. But some additional steps were made in the
upward road to scientific truth, and of these we must now give an
account.
CHAPTER IV.
32 Ibid.
33 Göttingen, 1821.
Correction of the Law of the same Angle for the same Substance.
This truth had been caught sight of, probably as a guess only, by
Fuchs as early as 1815. In speaking of a mineral which had been
called Gehlenite, he says, “I hold the oxide of iron, not for an
essential component part of this genus, but only as a vicarious
element, replacing so much lime. We shall find it necessary to
consider the results of several analyses of mineral bodies in this
point of view, if we wish, on the one hand, to bring them into
agreement with the doctrine of chemical proportions, and on the
other, to avoid unnecessarily splitting up genera.” In a lecture On the
Mutual Influence of 335 Chemistry and Mineralogy, 36 he again draws
attention to his term vicarious (vicarirende), which undoubtedly
expresses the nature of the general law afterwards established by
Mitscherlich in 1822.
36 Munich, 1820.