Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

BIG HISTORY PROJECT / LESSON 1.

3 ACTIVITY STUDENT MATERIALS


WRITING – CLAIM AND FOCUS WARM-UP
Preparation
• Carefully read the Investigation prompt you will be responding to. Be sure to have read and analyzed the documents prior to doing this warm-up activity.

Purpose
As you develop your close reading, critical thinking, and historical thinking skills, you also build writing skills that will help you in a lot of other classes.
This warm-up introduces the Claim and Focus row of the Writing Rubric and allows you to better understand those concepts and how they apply to
thinking and writing. At the same time, this activity gives you an opportunity to practice in preparation for writing an essay using OER Project’s automatic
essay-scoring feature, Score.

Process
In this quick warm-up activity, you’ll learn how to use the language of an essay prompt to make a claim, provide focus for that claim, and then make a
counterclaim. Your teacher might ask you to do just some of the steps in this activity, so be sure to listen for instructions.
Part 1 – Claim
What is a thesis or major claim in an essay? Discuss your ideas with your class.
How do we figure out how to write a thesis/major claim in response to a prompt? One way to do this is by turning the essay prompt/question into the stem
of a statement, and then adding a little more information to make it a claim. Then, you can make an even stronger claim statement by getting even more
specific. Work through an example of this with your class.
Then, repeat this process using the prompt you are getting ready to respond to.
Part 2 – Focus
What is focus in an essay? Discuss your ideas with your class and refer to the BHP Writing Rubric for more information.
How do you maintain focus in an essay? One way to do this is by linking back to key words and ideas from the thesis/major claim. Review the thesis/major
claim from Step 1 and underline the key points that were included that you could write more about in the body of the paper. Then, work with your class to
create three supporting claims that mirror the language or ideas from the original claim.
Now, do the same thing using the thesis/major claim you wrote in Step 1 in response to the prompt you’ve been assigned.
Part 3 – Counterclaim
What is a counterclaim? Discuss your thinking with your class.
How do you make a counterclaim? To weave a counterclaim into your thesis/major claim statement, ask yourself this: Who would disagree with your
statement and why? What alternative or opposing viewpoints might you encounter when discussing this topic? Once you’ve considered other viewpoints,
try weaving them in. Work through the following example with your class.
Now, create a counterclaim related to the prompt you will be responding to.
Once you’re done, you’re ready to write!
S-1
BIG HISTORY PROJECT / LESSON 1.3 ACTIVITY STUDENT MATERIALS
WRITING – CLAIM AND FOCUS WARM-UP Name: Date:

Directions: Work through each of the steps to help prepare yourself to respond to the essay prompt.

Step 1 – Thesis/Major Claim


Write the essay prompt Turn the prompt into the stem of a statement Complete the sentence stem to produce a clear thesis/
major claim statement

Now, rewrite your thesis/major claim to make it more specific by including a preview into some of the reasons why you support your thesis/major claim.

S-2
BIG HISTORY PROJECT / LESSON 1.3 ACTIVITY STUDENT MATERIALS
WRITING – CLAIM AND FOCUS WARM-UP Name: Date:

Having trouble? The sentence stems below may help. These kinds of stems can also appear throughout the body of the argument, where you might
address more than one counterpoint as you are building your argument.
• On one hand…. On the other hand….
• Though some historians argue…, a deeper analysis shows…
• Despite the fact that many people believe…
• While many say that..

S-3
BIG HISTORY PROJECT / LESSON 1.3 ACTIVITY STUDENT MATERIALS
WRITING – CLAIM AND FOCUS WARM-UP Name: Date:

BHP Writing Rubric

Advanced Proficient Developing Emerging


Claim and Focus* The essay makes a precise and The essay makes a clear claim The essay makes a claim based on The essay makes an overly
significant claim based on the topic based on the topic and/or the topic and/or source(s), but it may simplistic or vague claim, or
Make a clear claim about the
and/or source(s). The essay maintains source(s). The essay maintains not fully address the demands of the a position on the topic and/
topic early in the essay and
a strong focus on defending a directly focus on defending an identifiable prompt. Counterclaims may not be or source(s) may not be
focus on proving it.
stated position, using the whole essay position, using most of the essay to acknowledged, and the essay may stated. Counterclaims are not
to support and develop the claim support and develop the claim and not stay focused on the purpose and acknowledged, and the essay does
and counterclaims while thoroughly counterclaims while addressing task. not address the purpose, task, or
addressing the demands of the prompt. the demands of the prompt. demands of the prompt.

Analysis and Evidence The essay cites the most appropriate The essay cites sufficient and The essay cites evidence to support The essay cites minimal or
and valid evidence to support appropriate evidence to support its claim, but it may be insufficient irrelevant evidence to support
Choose the right evidence
its claim, drawing information its claim, drawing information or draw unevenly from available its claim. Support may rely
and explain how it supports
substantively from multiple sources from multiple sources to defend sources. Support may be inadequate primarily on opinion, reasoning,
the claim and analysis.
to defend its position and effectively its position and refute counter- in defense of the position and or summary of the source(s)
refute counterclaims. The essay claims. The essay demonstrates refutation of the counterclaim without clear cited evidence. The
demonstrates insightful reasoning and reasoning and understanding or rely too heavily on summary. essay demonstrates little to no
careful understanding of the sources, of the sources, potentially The essay demonstrates some reasoning and/or understanding of
acknowledging inconsistencies or acknowledging inconsistencies reasoning and/or understanding of the sources. An explanation of the
weaknesses in evidence, and fully or weaknesses in evidence, the sources, though explanations of relationship between claims and
explains the relationship between and adequately explains the the relationship between claims and support is not present.
claims and support. relationship between claims and support are not always clear.
support.

Organization The essay incorporates precise The essay employs an The essay uses a simplistic An organizational structure is not
transitions within a sophisticated organizational structure that organizational structure, though evident, and relationships between
Present ideas in a structure
organizational structure that shows the relationships between relationships between ideas may ideas are not consistently clear.
that enhances the analysis.
enhances the relationships between and among ideas, yielding a not be consistently clear. Use of The essay may read as a series
Use transitions throughout
and among ideas and promotes cohesive analysis. Clear transitions transitions is sparse, repetitive, and/ of unrelated ideas, as the absence
the essay to make
cohesion and clarity. A well-executed, support a logical progression or does not show the connections of transitions makes it difficult to
connections clear.
logical progression of ideas is clearly of ideas, including an effective among sections of the text. A see connections among sections
constructed, including an effective introduction and a conclusion progression of ideas is evident, of the text. An introduction and/
introduction and a conclusion which which follows from and supports however, the introduction and/ or conclusion is missing from the
follows from and supports the claim the claim and analysis. or conclusion may not be fully essay.
and analysis. developed or follow from and
support the claim and/or analysis.

S-4
BIG HISTORY PROJECT / LESSON 1.3 ACTIVITY STUDENT MATERIALS
WRITING – CLAIM AND FOCUS WARM-UP Name: Date:

Advanced Proficient Developing Emerging


Language and Style The essay has an established, formal The essay has an established, formal The essay attempts to establish The essay does not establish and/
style and objective tone that is style that is maintained throughout. a formal style that may not be or maintain a formal style. The
Use specific, interesting
maintained throughout. The essay The essay uses mostly correct, maintained throughout. The essay essay uses little variety in sentence
language and clear sentence
uses varied sentence structure, varied sentence structure and attempts to vary sentence structure structure, and the language is
structure to communicate
precise language, and domain-specific generally uses precise language and uses some precise language general and not domain-specific.
ideas.
vocabulary in a way that addresses and domain-specific vocabulary in that may be domain-specific at times The essay contains errors that
the complexity of the topic. Few a way that generally addresses the but may address the complexity of interfere with meaning.
errors are present, and they do not complexity of the topic. The essay the topic inconsistently. The essay
interfere with meaning. may have some errors, but they do contains some errors that may
not interfere with meaning. interfere with meaning.

Applying BHP Concepts† The essay applies at least two The essay applies one BHP course- The essay tries to apply at least The essay incorrectly or
BHP course-level concepts and/or level concept and/or unit-level one BHP course-level and/or unit- inappropriately mentions at least
Choose and accurately apply
unit-level concepts or content. The concept or content. The concept level concept or content, but does one BHP course-level concept and/
the relevant BHP concepts
concepts or content are connected or content is connected to the not fully articulate the concept's or unit-level concept or content,
in a way that shows
to the argument or evidence in argument or evidence in the essay, meaning or connection to the and it may include misconceptions
understanding, and further
the essay, and misconceptions are and misconceptions are avoided. argument and/or evidence. It does of that concept. The essay may
supports the argument and
avoided. There are no errors in There are no errors in applying avoid explicit misconceptions of the make many minor errors or a major
evidence presented in the
applying BHP concepts or content, BHP concepts or content to concept but may make an occasional error in applying BHP facts or
essay.
and the essay demonstrates a clear illustrate or support concepts and minor error in applying BHP facts concepts.
understanding of the topic and the claims, or to inform the essay. or concepts to illustrate or support
concepts. The essay might include concepts and claims, or to inform
information about the overall time the essay.
period discussed in the essay and
might make use of broader historical
content than is located in the
course.

*Turnitin, LLC, created the first four rows of this rubric for use with their Revision Assistant and Turnitin tools.

†The “Applying BHP Concepts” row of the rubric should be used by teachers and students to assess student learning and understanding in this area. Teachers should not assess student
writing using Turnitin reports exclusively.

S-5

You might also like