Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full download Internet of Multimedia Things (IoMT): Techniques and Applications Shailendra Shukla file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download Internet of Multimedia Things (IoMT): Techniques and Applications Shailendra Shukla file pdf all chapter on 2024
https://ebookmass.com/product/enabling-the-internet-of-things-
fundamentals-design-and-applications-muhammad-azhar-iqbal/
https://ebookmass.com/product/chemical-gas-and-biosensors-for-
internet-of-things-and-related-applications-kohji-mitsubayashi/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-internet-of-things-john-davies/
https://ebookmass.com/product/machine-learning-and-the-internet-
of-things-in-education-models-and-applications-john-bush-idoko/
Internet Of Things 1st Edition Raj Kamal
https://ebookmass.com/product/internet-of-things-1st-edition-raj-
kamal/
https://ebookmass.com/product/internet-of-things-systems-design-
lab-book-charith-perera/
https://ebookmass.com/product/connecting-the-internet-of-things-
iot-connectivity-standards-and-solutions-anil-kumar/
https://ebookmass.com/product/human-technology-communication-
internet-of-robotic-things-and-ubiquitous-r-anandan/
https://ebookmass.com/product/micropython-for-the-internet-of-
things-2nd-edition-charles-bell/
Internet of Multimedia Things
(IoMT)
FIRST EDITION
Shailendra Shukla
MNNIT Allahabad, Allahabad, India
Gautam Srivastava
Brandon University, Brandon, MB, Canada
Fatos Xhafa
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Spain
Table of Contents
Cover image
Title page
Copyright
Contributors
Abstract
1.1. Introduction
References
2.1. Introduction
2.6. Conclusion
References
Abstract
3.1. Introduction
References
4.1. Introduction
4.6. Summary
References
Abstract
5.1. Introduction
5.9. Summary
References
Chapter 6: The use of deep learning in image analysis for the study
of oncology
Abstract
6.7. Conclusion
References
Abstract
7.1. Introduction
7.6. Conclusions
References
Abstract
8.1. Introduction
8.5. Conclusion
References
Abstract
9.1. Introduction
9.4. Definitions
9.6. Framework
9.7. Experiments
9.8. Conclusion
References
Abstract
10.1. Introduction
10.7. Conclusion
References
Index
Copyright
Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier
125 London Wall, London EC2Y 5AS, United Kingdom
525 B Street, Suite 1650, San Diego, CA 92101, United States
50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States
The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, United
Kingdom
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing.
As new research and experience broaden our understanding,
changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical
treatment may become necessary.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the
authors, contributors, or editors, assume any liability for any injury
and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products
liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of
any methods, products, instructions, or ideas contained in the
material herein.
ISBN: 978-0-323-85845-8
Typeset by VTeX
Contributors
Chady Abou Jaoude Antonine University, Faculty of Engineering
– TICKET Lab, Beirut, Lebanon
Gaurav Bhatnagar Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of
Technology Jodhpur, India
Zahi Al Chami
Antonine University, Faculty of Engineering – TICKET Lab, Beirut,
Lebanon
Universite de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour, E2S UPPA, LIUPPA,
Anglet, France
Chiranjoy Chattopadhyay Department of Computer Science and
Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, India
Richard Chbeir Universite de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour, E2S
UPPA, LIUPPA, Anglet, France
Rupesh Kumar Dewang Department of Computer Science &
Engineering, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology
Allahabad, Prayagraj, India
Vivek K. Dwivedi Department of Electronics and Communication
Engineering, Jaypee Institute of Information Technology, Noida,
India
Shreya Goyal Department of Computer Science and Engineering,
Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, India
Puneet Kumar Jain Department of Computer Science and
Engineering, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Odisha,
India
Bailey Janeczko Department of Math and Computer Science,
Brandon University, Brandon, MB, Canada
Niharika Keshari Department of Computer Science &
Engineering, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology
Allahabad, Prayagraj, India
Prateek Ishwar Khade Department of Computer Science &
Information Systems, Birla Institute of Technology and Science,
Pilani, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan, India
Alok Kumar Department of Electronics and Communication
Engineering, Jaypee University of Information Technology, Solan,
India
Om Prakash Mahela Power System Planning Division, Rajasthan
Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd., Jaipur, India
Ashish Kumar Maurya Department of Computer Science &
Engineering, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology
Allahabad, Prayagraj, India
Shweta Pandit Department of Electronics and Communication
Engineering, Jaypee University of Information Technology, Solan,
India
Amitesh Singh Rajput Department of Computer Science &
Information Systems, Birla Institute of Technology and Science,
Pilani, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan, India
Yasar Abbas Ur Rehman TCL Corporate Research Hong Kong,
Hong Kong
Shailendra Shukla Computer Science and Engineering
Department, MNNIT Allahabad, Allahabad, India
Amit Kumar Singh Computer Science and Engineering
Department, NIT Patna, Patna, India
Dinesh Singh Department of Computer Science & Engineering,
Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad,
Prayagraj, India
Ghanshyam Singh Centre for Smart Information and
Communication Systems, Department of Electrical and Electronics
Engineering Science, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg,
South Africa
Shyam Pratap Singh Department of Electronics and
Communication Engineering, Galgotia College of Engineering and
Technology, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
Gautam Srivastava Department of Math and Computer Science,
Brandon University, Brandon, MB, Canada
Muhammad Tariq National University of Computer and
Emerging Sciences (NUCES), Peshawar, Pakistan
Prabhat Thakur Department of Electrical and Electronics
Engineering Science, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg,
South Africa
Asheesh Kumar Mani Tripathi Information and Cyber Security
Services, HCL, Noida, India
Chapter 1: A review on Internet
of Multimedia Things (IoMT)
routing protocols and quality of
service
Dinesh Singh; Ashish Kumar Maurya; Rupesh
Kumar Dewang; Niharika Keshari Department of Computer Science &
Engineering, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad,
Prayagraj, India
Abstract
An interconnected network of multimedia devices is known as
the Internet of Multimedia Things (IoMT). The characteristic of
IoT to produce scalar sensor data differentiates this from IoMT.
The IoMT consists of tiny multimedia devices that require less
energy consumption and real-time data delivery. IoMT requires
many multimedia devices connected through a stable network,
efficient routing protocol, and lightweight computation to
achieve the objective. The suitable design of the routing protocol
improves the performance of IoMT in many folds. The Internet
Engineering Task Force (IETF) user working group has
standardized the IPv6 routing protocol for low power and lossy
networks (RPL). The RPL is ubiquitous for resource-constrained
devices and perfectly suitable for IoMT. In IoMT, the significant
issues with the routing protocols are a large number of
heterogeneous devices, high bit error rate, frequent link breaks,
assurance of the quality of service, and emission of CO2. In
addition to the suitable traditional routing protocol of IoT, many
green routing protocols, fault-tolerant routing protocols,
context-aware, and energy harvesting-aware routing protocols
are specially designed for IoMT. The efficient design of routing
protocol and improved quality of service (QoS) widens the
application spectrum of IoMT in intelligent environments. This
chapter presents a comprehensive review of traditional and
most recent routing protocols and QoS in IoMT. The design of
these protocols successfully satisfies the current and future
requirements of the IoMT network in terms of handling a large
volume of data, heterogeneous data types, and energy issues.
Keywords
Internet of Multimedia Things; Routing protocols; Quality of service;
IoMT; RPL; IoT; Multimedia applications; Survey
1.1 Introduction
During the last decade, Internet of Things (IoT) has grown very fast
and connected numerous devices worldwide. IoT can provide
anytime, anyplace connectivity for anyone and anything [1,2].
Presently, 23.8 billion units of devices are connected to the Internet,
and this amount is expected to jump 41.2 billion units by 2025 [3].
The IoT devices have limited memory, size, energy, and computing
capabilities [4]. Thus, these IoT connected devices highly depend on
reliable communication network and efficient routing protocols [5].
Technical developments in IoT operating systems [6], IoT enabling
platforms [7], 5G IoT [8,9], wireless sensor networks (WSNs) [10,11],
software defined networks (SDNs) [12], mobile ad hoc networks
(MANETs) [13–16], vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) [17,18],
fog/edge computing [19,20], cloud computing [21], are facilitating
IoT to comprehend to connect anything and anywhere [22].
The massive growth in multimedia on-demand traffics such as
images, audios, and videos, has evolved the concept of Internet of
Multimedia Things (IoMT) from IoT [22]. IoMT devices produce
massive amount of multimedia data and are more constrained than
IoT devices. They need more processing power, massive memory
storage, adequate bandwidth, and consumes more power to support
the underlying application efficiently [22,23]. The comparison
between key data characteristics of IoT and IoMT [22] has shown in
Table 1.1. The IoMT has diverse applications like smart grid, smart
cities, industrial IoT, smart homes, health IoT, smart farming and
agriculture, traffic monitoring, soil health monitoring, and satellite
control systems. Most of these applications are interactive
applications that involve reliable and timely delivery of data. Hence,
it demands efficient routing protocols, and enforces stringent quality
of service (QoS) parameters [23]. Due to transmission of
unstructured, bulky and multimedia data over the network, IoMT
needs revision of existing routing protocols of IoT which focus on
energy aware computing, efficient feature extraction, and optimizing
routing criteria to minimize delays [23]. The quality of service
performance in IoMT is determined by various metrics such as
bandwidth, packet loss ratio, delay, throughput, resource
management, and energy conservation [23]. The quality of service in
technical white paper [24] is defined by Microsoft as: “Network QoS
refers to the ability of the network to handle this traffic such that it
meets the service needs of certain applications.” The frequent packet
loss and redundant packet delivery degrade the quality of
constrained multimedia applications in IoMT network. The massive
amount of data produced in IoMT network from many
heterogeneous sources creates the processing overburden on the
routing devices, resulting in packet loss.
Table 1.1