VAKALATNAMA

(SCR Order IV Rule 18)

IN THE SUPREME COURI OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
(CIVIL/SLPWP No of 20

SessioN TRIAL No 91290) PETITIONE R(>)

Abhas miy n @ Abhas i Abas A APPELL ANT G)
VERSUS
U n of JNDr A
RESPONDENT(S)

I Abas ALi slo- SUKar miyan vi). pek sa

pis- hichos Barisaki the Dís- (hataa Thaehnd
Petitioner / Respondent in the above Petition / Appeal / Reterence do hereby
appoint and rela1n Shiv Shc nlcey Sahy Advocate to act
and appear for melus in the above Suit/Appeal /Reference and on my / our behalf
to conduct and prosecute or (defend) the same and all proceed1ngs that may be
taken in respect of any application connected with the same or any deuree or order
passed therein includ1ng proceed1ngs in taxation and application for Review to file
and obtain return of documents and to depos1t and recerve money on my Iour
behalf in the said Suit /Appeal Petition / Reference and in application of Review
and to represent me/us and to take allnecessary steps on my / our tbehalf in the
above matter We agree to ratify all acts done by the aforesad advocate in
persuance of ths authority
Dated this the day of 20
Accepted

Advocate
cOUNTERSIGNED
Sepqotyeon
L.J.N. Central <ail! Hazaribag PETITIONER
MEMO OF APPEARANCE
SIG-ATTESTED
To.
The Reg1strar JAILOR
L.J.N. Central Jail, Hazaribaqg
Supreme Court of Inda
New Delhi-110001

Sir,
Please enter my appearance on behalf of the Petitioner(s) Appellant(s)
Respondent(s)in the above mentioned matter
Dated this the day of .20

Yours faithfully

ADVOCATE
The Address for Service of the sad advocate is
72506S966
 )
I18
rm 143) yrafteát (E.LR) Sa572426
(do yo io i I 154 3 i )

(S. Div.) PS) (Yr.) (PLR. No ) (Date)

(Distt.)

2 ) "aff44 (Ac) *Urag (Sections)

395
(J) fufrán (Act)... *UTIT (Sctions)

(Ui) *fufu4 (Act) *URIT (Sections)

(IV) "3 fuffqH £ yIí (Other Acts and Sections).

3 (#)
(Occurrence of offence)
"fA. ."tiftu à 27 |p3|1 6 fafy
(Date from)
a6
(Dale to)
(Day)

*afu (8) *qà .

(Time period) (Time from) (Time to)

...03.:20
(1) yefirt à fafy 27|3|16. i3.:co.9t
( ) er } f 4-yfaf io 43..00.Gr
4 H l yGI (Type of information) *fefga/nfuh (Witten/Oral)

(a) " (Adress) erz.AaT 0 g1t31..2ITturot

ENT (&) I4

()fu i 4 .t..RHHHDIRIZT.
UPEE -fafa () gryaI.

(3) YVa o

() t I C A
JTqYal 47, vVa do |I8 (2)

7.

*GH-ffy
*fein (fafeyrHTH/q)
(Sex) Date of Birth (Build) (Jdentification
Height (Complexion)
(Date/tMonth/Ycar) (in cms) mark)
2 3 4 5

(Deformities/ (Teeth) (Hair) (Eyc) (Habits) (Dress Hatits)

peculiarities)
7 8 9 10 12

(Language *fat *H f
Dialect) (Burm Mark) (Leucoderma) (Mole) :(Scar) (Tattoo)
13 J4 15,3 16 18

N
 osfoa/n518)

(3)

10. ` Tt/314AIYG Hfri pi ye (Total value of properties stolen/involved/recovered)

11. 3arTCE YG h0a Ho, yf t (U.D. Case No., if any)

20cO
TLNTY
RUPEI

ND
 (4)

FáraR faq sTt 34Ì qa sft ftartrqaai fAig rîi

(Action taken: Since the above repcrt revcals
commiasion: of offence(s) u/s as mentioned at Item No. 2, registered
directed*. the case ahd tookup the investigation
Rank.... .to ake up the investigation.)

2703136

PL-F26-7000Bks-13/06-07

Certitied to be a tTupy

Sar
-ui 872*
Comyadby
"Authorised UederS.:.
 iurrroar

ol
20o
UPEE gpa'hane

alrerdy

akep

rt
mestyt,
IN THE HIGH COURT oF JHARKIIAND AT RANCHI
B. A. No. 573 of 2023

Petitioner
Ablhash Miyan (@ Abas Ali @Abash Miyan
Versus
The State of Jharkhand Opp. Party

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICEGAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY

For the Petitioner :Mr. Lukesh Kumar, Advocate

For the State :Mr. Sanat Kr. Jha, A.P.P.

Oral Order
04 / Dated : 29.03.2023

Heard leamed counsel for the parties.

in counection with
The petitioner named abovc has been made accused
the offence
Chouparan P.S. Case No. 52 of 2016 (G.R. No. 909 of 2016) for
under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.
petitioner has
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the
on test identification
been falsely implicated in this case and he has not been put
parade.
Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and
loaded with 16
submitted that the matter involves hijacking and looting a truck
similar nature.
tons of rice and the petitioner has criminal antecedent of
Considering the gravity of offence, am not inclined to enlarge the

petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is hereby rejected.

(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.)

AKT
 (38)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. S359 of 2016
Md. Umar Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Jharkhand ..Opp. Party.

CORAM :HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN

For the Petitioner Mrs. Jasvindar Mazumda, Advocate.

For the State A.P.P.

sections 395 of
4/05.09.2016: The petitioner is an accused for the offence under
the Indian Penal code.
The
It is alleged that the truck loaded with rice was looted.
petitioner was not named in the first information report. The petitioner has been
made accused on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Md. Amjad
Abbas on the
and the recovery of looted rice was made from the house of Md.
pointing out by the co-accused Md. Amjad, which is apparent from paragraph 61
of the case diary. The petitioner was only accompanying the police while
recovery of looted rice was made.
Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Regard being had to the aforesaid facts, the petitioner, namely, Md.
Umar, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/
(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the
Smt. Garima Mishra, learned Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribagh, in connection
with Chaupran P.S. Case No. 52 of 2016, corresponding to G.R. No. 909 of 2016,
subject to the condition that he should mark his presence before Chaupran P.S.
One in a month.

(ANANDA SEN,J)
Sharma/
 (2)

IN THE HIGHCOURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

B.A. No, 8618 of 2016

Village-Datmi, PO. &

Md. Amjad, son of Md. Kalbiruddin, resident of Petitioner
PS.-Hunterganj, District-Chatra
Versus
The State of Jharklhand Opposite Party

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR

Advocate
For the Petitioner : Mr. Prabhat Kumar Sinha,
For the State :Mr. Rajesh Kumar Mishra, A.PP

02/11.11.2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

registered under
The petitioner is an accused in a case
Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.
submits that the
The learned counsel for the petitioner
has been falsely been
petitioner is not named in the EI.R. and
information given
implicated in the present case on the basis of certain
Md. Umar is concerned, he
by the spy. So far as the co-accused namely,
co-ordinate Bench of this Court
has already been enlarged on bail by a
2016. Moreover, the
vide order dated 05.09.2016 in B.A. No. 5359 of
petitioner is in judicial custody since 11.04.2016.
The learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for
bailof the petitioner.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the
released on bail on his
petitioner above named is directed to be
thousand) with twO
furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten
satisfaction of learned Sessions
sureties of the like amount each to the
of 2016, subject to
Judge, Hazaribagh, in connection with S.T. No. 214
the trial and shall
the condition that the petitioner shall co-operate in
when his presence is
be physically present before the trial court as and
at liberty to pass
required, failing which the trial court shall be
law.
appropriate orders in accordance with

(Rajesh Shankar, J.)

Manish
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 929 of 2017
Petitioner
Md. Laddan @Javed Alam
Versus
The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN

Advocate
For the Petitioner : Mr. Munna Lal Yadav,
For the State A.P.P
02/Dated: 15th February, 2017
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
offence under section
The petitioner is an accused for the
395 of the Indian Penal Code.
the
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
been falsely
petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and has
name of the
implicated in the present case. He submits that the
of co
petitioner transpires from the confessional statement
that the other
accused, namely, Md. Amjad. He lastly submits
Hon'ble Court
co-accused person has been granted bail by this
in B.A. No. 8618 of 2016.
Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
of this
Regard being had to the facts and circumstances
be released on bail
case, petitioner named above, is directed to
Thousand)
on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten
satisfaction of
with two sureties of like amount each, to the
in
learned Principal District and Session Judge, Hazaribag,
connection with Chouparan P.S. Case No. 52 of 2016,
2016).
corresponding to G.R. No. 909 of 2016 (S.T. No. 214 of

(Ananda Sen, J.)

Amar
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 2951 of 2017
Sohail @ Afroz Alam ...Petitioner
Vs.
The State of }harkhand ...Opposite Party
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA
For the Petitioner: Mr. Vishal Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the State: Mr. Vijay Kumar Gupta, APP
4/02.05.2017: Heard both the counsels.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that
three other co-accused, namely, Md. Umar, Md. Amjad and Md.
Ladden @Javed Alam have already been granted bail in B.A. No. 5359
of 2016 vide order dated 05.09.2016, in B.A. No. 8618 of 20l6 vide
order dated 11.11.2016 and in B.A. No. 929 of 2017 vide order dated
15.2.2017 respectively and he seeks parity. He has further submitted
that the allegation was against unknown, therefore, he is not named in
the FIR, later on during the course of investigation his name has come
and petitioner is in custody from 15.4.2016, therefore he may be
released on bail.
Learned counsel for the State has opposed the bail
application, but not denied the cited bail orders.
Having heard counsels for both the side; having gone
through the records of the case and in the facts and circumstances of
the case, I direct the court below to enlarçe the petitioner, above
named, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- ( Twenty
Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction
of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1* Class, Hazaribagh in connection with
Chouparan P.S. Case No. 52 of 2016 (G.R. No. 909 of 2016), subject
to the condition that the petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and
shall be physically present before the trial court as and when his
presence is required, failing which the trial court shall be at liberty to
pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

(Ratnaker Bhengra,).)
Sharda/
 Tn the (ount af Si (eanan fausen, A0J- ,
G-T. N0 -18/00
4tate- v(s

E GRI 218 /2023 CNR-JHHBO1004462-2023

Misc Criminal Appl. No. 1175/2023
23,06,23

nNDIA20c
ENI
afH
FUPEES
2306 23

N
I|-52 /2016
fh-2703.2016 30la R 395

.
151-5838 hT
alc| i-26.03 2016 l GdT c R
 Ha qK H|-218/2023

23.06.23

20
RUPEES
TEY
UTINDIA
 qK 0I-218/2023

23.06.23
 HE AC HOI-218/2023

23.06.23
 Government of Indie

Md Mubarak Ansan
Authority of india
HeH a IYear of Birth: 2001 Uniqueldentification
T Minya,
q09/Male Address S/O Mahru
vill mahesha.po-mandhaniy.0s-itkhor
S/O. As fAu
Mahesa, Chatra Mandhania
Jharkhand,82540A

2277 5721 0882 825408

2277 57210882
hale @uidai gov is
47
1800 300 t947
-

iksh kuma