Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full download Case Studies in Geospatial Applications to Groundwater Resources Pravat Kumar Shit file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download Case Studies in Geospatial Applications to Groundwater Resources Pravat Kumar Shit file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download Case Studies in Geospatial Applications to Groundwater Resources Pravat Kumar Shit file pdf all chapter on 2024
Applications to Groundwater
Resources Pravat Kumar Shit
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmass.com/product/case-studies-in-geospatial-applications-to-groundwat
er-resources-pravat-kumar-shit/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
https://ebookmass.com/product/advances-in-remediation-techniques-
for-polluted-soils-and-groundwater-pankaj-kumar-gupta/
https://ebookmass.com/product/business-research-an-illustrative-
guide-to-practical-methodological-applications-in-selected-case-
studies-pieter-w-buys/
https://ebookmass.com/product/c-how-to-program-with-case-studies-
in-applications-and-systems-programming-global-edition-paul-
deitel/
https://ebookmass.com/product/case-studies-in-multicultural-
counseling-and-therapy/
Hard Evidence: Case Studies in Forensic Anthropology
https://ebookmass.com/product/hard-evidence-case-studies-in-
forensic-anthropology/
https://ebookmass.com/product/case-studies-in-psychotherapy-7th-
edition-ebook-pdf/
https://ebookmass.com/product/case-studies-in-pediatric-
dysphagia-jennifer-j-wilson/
https://ebookmass.com/product/nanomaterials-for-clinical-
applications-case-studies-in-nanomedicines-micro-and-nano-
technologies-1st-edition-costas-demetzos-editor/
https://ebookmass.com/product/case-studies-in-abnormal-
psychology-2nd-edition-ebook-pdf/
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical,
including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing
from the publisher. Details on how to seek permission, further information about the Publisher’s permissions policies
and our arrangements with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency,
can be found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions.
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the Publisher (other than
as may be noted herein).
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience broaden our
understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical treatment may become necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating and using any
information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such information or methods they
should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including parties for whom they have a professional
responsibility.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors, assume any liability for
any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any
use or operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein.
ISBN: 978-0-323-99963-2
Contents
Contributors xv
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 GIS and groundwater 2
1.3 Remote sensing and groundwater 3
1.4 Geostatistics and groundwater 4
1.5 Geocomputational modeling and groundwater 5
1.6 Geospatial intelligence and groundwater modeling 6
1.7 WebGIS and groundwater resource 7
1.8 Conclusion and future direction 8
References 8
2.1 Introduction 11
2.2 Basic theory of indicator kriging 12
2.3 Criticisms of indicator kriging 13
2.4 Merits of indicator kriging 14
2.5 Practical corrections to use indicator kriging 15
2.6 Applications in water science 16
2.7 Conclusions 23
References 24
v
vi Contents
3.1 Introduction 27
3.2 Hydrosphere–geosphere–anthroposphere interlinked
dynamics 29
3.3 Spatial and machine learning model for groundwater
mapping 29
3.4 Big data analytics and groundwater mapping 30
3.5 Geospatial intelligence and information communication
technology 32
3.6 Expert knowledge and GIScience 33
3.7 Data imbalances and new professionalism 34
3.8 Conclusion 34
References 35
4.1 Introduction 39
4.2 Study area 40
4.3 Data source and methodology 42
4.4 Result and discussions 49
4.5 Conclusion 62
Conflict of interest 63
References 63
Contents vii
5.1 Introduction 67
5.2 Study area 68
5.3 Methodology 69
5.4 Results & discussion 72
5.5 Conclusion 86
References 87
6.1 Introduction 91
6.2 Study area 92
6.3 Database and methodology 93
6.4 Results and discussion 99
6.5 Conclusion 104
Conflict of interest 105
References 105
Index 411
Contributors
xv
xvi Contributors
Mantu Das
Department of Geography and Applied Geography, University of North Bengal, Raja
Rammohunpur, Darjeeling, West Bengal, India
Sandipan Das
Symbiosis Institute of Geoinformatics (SIG), Symbiosis International (Deemed University),
Pune, India
Pritiranjan Das
Department of Geography, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore, West Bengal, India
Pulakesh Das
World Resources Institute India, New Delhi, India
Subhrangsu Das
Department of Geography, Utkal University, Odisha, India
Nirmalya Das
Department of Geography, Panskura Banamali College (Autonomous), Panskura, West Bengal,
India
Tapan Kumar Das
Department of Geography, Cooch Behar College, Cooch Behar, West Bengal, India
Nilanjana Das Chatterjee
Department of Geography, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore, West Bengal, India
Ch. Jyotiprava Dash
ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Koraput, Odisha, India
Gour Dolui
Department of Geography, Panskura Banamali College (Autonomous), Panskura, West Bengal,
India
Adebayo Oluwole Eludoyin
Department of Geography, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
Adewole Abraham Fajiwe
Department of Geography, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
Sanjoy Garai
Institute of Forest Productivity, Lalgutwa, Ranchi, India
Anadi Gayen
Central Ground Water Board, Eastern Region, Kolkata, Department of Water Resources,
River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation, Ministry of Jal Shakti,
Government of India, India
Contributors xvii
Arijit Ghosh
Department of Geography, Sidho-Kanho-Birsha University, Purulia, India
Santu Guchhait
Department of Geography, Panskura Banamali College (Autonomous), Panskura, West Bengal,
India
Aznarul Islam
Department of Geography, Aliah University, Kolkata, India
Subrata Jana
Department of Geography, Belda College, Belda, Paschim Medinipur, India
Sriparna Jana
Department of Geography, Bajkul Milani Mahavidyalaya, Bajkul, Purba Medinipur, India
Masjuda Khatun
Institute of Forest Productivity, Lalgutwa, Ranchi, India
Satish S. Kulkarni
Department of Geology, Bharatiya Mahavidyalaya, Amravati, India
Jotirmayee Lenka
ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Koraput, Odisha, India
Sadik Mahammad
Department of Geography, Aliah University, Kolkata, India
Biswajit Maity
Department of Geography, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore, West Bengal, India
Arijit Majumder
Department of Geography, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India
Tapash Mandal
Department of Geography and Applied Geography, University of North Bengal, Darjeeling,
India
S. Mohanty
ICAR-Indian Institute of Water Management, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
xviii Contributors
Swatilekha Parihari
Department of Geography, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore, West Bengal, India
Priyank Pravin Patel
Department of Geography, Presidency University, Kolkata
Pranav Pratik
Department of Geography, Presidency University, Kolkata
Sk Mujibar Rahaman
Institute of Forest Productivity, Lalgutwa, Ranchi, India
Somnath Rudra
Department of Geography, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore, West Bengal, India
Snehasish Saha
Department of Geography and Applied Geography, University of North Bengal, Darjeeling,
India
Dipankar Saha
Department of Geography, Coochbehar Panchanan Barma University, Cooch Behar,
West Bengal, India
Ujjal Senapati
Department of Geography, Coochbehar Panchanan Barma University, Cooch Behar,
West Bengal, India
Pravat Kumar Shit
Department of Geography, Raja N. L. Khan Women’s College (Autonomous), Midnapore,
West Bengal, India
Debasish Talukdar
Department of Geography, Coochbehar Panchanan Barma University, Cooch Behar,
West Bengal, India
Sharad Tiwari
Institute of Forest Productivity, Lalgutwa, Ranchi, India
Sumedh R. Warghat
Department of Geology, Bharatiya Mahavidyalaya, Amravati, India
1
1.1 Introduction
The origins of GIScience can be traced back to two keynote speeches by Michael F. Goodchild
of the University of California, Santa Barbara at a conference in Europe. “Progress of the GIS
Research Agenda” at the 2nd European GIS Conference held in Brussels, Belgium in July 1990
and April 1991. GIScience is an existing technology and research field of geographic informa-
tion system (GIS), mapping (mapping), geodesy (measurement of the earth itself ), surveying
(measurement of natural and man-made features on the earth), orphotographs (measurements
using photographs), global positioning systems or GPS (accurate and accurate positioning of the
ground surface using satellites), digital image processing (processing and analysis of image data),
remote sensing (RS) (observation of the Earth from space or underwater), quantitative spatial
analysis and modeling (Rouhani and Hall, 1989). Therefore, GIScience covers issues such as
spatial data structure, analysis, accuracy, meaning, cognition, and visualization, some traditional
dealings with the physical processes of the earth, and the interaction between humans and
the earth. Overlapping areas of the discipline (e.g., geography, geology, and geophysics, marine
science, ecology, environmental sciences, applied mathematics, spatial statistics, physics), and
mutual between humans and computer technology. Fields dealing with action (e.g., computer
science, information science, cognitive science, cognitive psychology, artificial intelligence).
It is important to distinguish between GIS and GIScience. While GIS is primarily concerned
with hardware and software for capturing, manipulating, and displaying geographic data and
information (e.g., GIS as a container for data, maps, and software tools), GIScience is essentially
“The science behind GIS” or “the science behind the system.” In addition, starting with the
basic questions that occur using GIS (such as tracking errors through the system), a systematic
survey of geographic information from scientific methods (scale, accuracy, and quantitative
analysis of geospatial data). Science performed using GIS (e.g., developing spatial models to
predict susceptibility to local landslides, or developing agent-based models) simulating vehicle
Case Studies in Geospatial Applications to Groundwater Resources. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99963-2.00012-2
Copyright
c 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
1
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
The sporangia are in all cases capsule-like, and burst open when
ripe to eject the spores. They are nearly always situated on the
leaves (in Lycopodiaceæ, in the axils of the leaves, or above these,
on the stems themselves). In some forms (Leptosporangiatæ), the
sporangia are developed from a single epidermal cell; in others
(Eusporangiatæ), from a group of epidermal cells, or from cells
which lie beneath the epidermis. In the first group a primitive mother-
cell (archesporium) is formed, which divides commonly into sixteen
special mother-cells. In the latter group, on the other hand, a number
of primitive spore-mother-cells are developed. In each sporangium
three different tissues are generally developed; an innermost
sporogenous one (s in Fig. 204 A), which arises from the
archesporangium; an outermost one, which forms the wall (a), and
may be one or, more rarely, several layers in thickness; and an
intermediate one, the tapetum (Fig. 204 A, B, b t), which is rich in
protoplasm, and whose cells are dissolved so that the spores float
freely in the fluid thus provided. The spores arise as in the Mosses
(in tetrads), by the cross-division of the special mother-cells, and
according to the manner in which they are arranged in the mother-
cell have either a tetrahedral form, with a large base resembling a
segment of a ball, or are oblong (bilateral spores). Their construction
is the same as in the Mosses (p. 187).
Fig. 204.—Selaginella inæqualifolia. A A young sporangium, which may
develope either into a macro-, or a microsporangium. B A microsporangium.
The spore-formation in its earliest commencement takes place in
the same way in the Isosporous and the Heterosporous Vascular
Cryptogams; but from a certain point, after the tetrahedral division, a
difference occurs with regard to the macrosporangia. All the spores
formed in the microsporangium may complete their development; but
those which are formed in the macrosporangium are generally
aborted, with the exception of one or four, and these consequently
attain a much larger size (see Fig. 239.—The series to the left are
microsporangia; those to the right, macrosporangia).
Apogamy. In some Ferns (Pteris cretica; Aspidium filix mas, var. cristatum; A.
falcatum; Todea africana) the young plant is not developed as a consequence of
fertilisation, but as a bud from the prothallium. This is known as apogamy, or loss
of the power of sexual reproduction. The antheridia are generally more or less
developed; archegonia are entirely wanting in Asp. filix mas, var. cristatum. This
variety has probably only become apogamous through cultivation. Many
specimens of Isoëtes lacustris, in a lake in the Vosges mountains, produce in the
place where the sporangia are usually found, a vegetative shoot which grows into
a new plant, so that the sexual generation is wanting in this case. Some
specimens have sporangia on some leaves, and shoots on others.
Apospory, or the formation of prothallia instead of sporangia and spores on the
leaves, is found in Athyrium filix femina, var. clarissimum. In this case the
development of the sporangia proceeds only to a certain point, and from these
arrested sporangia the prothallia are produced. Normal sporangia are entirely
wanting in this variety, and in Aspidium angulare, var. pulcherrimum, sporangia are
completely wanting. Compare the Mosses (page 188).
Family 1. Eusporangiatæ.
Order 1. Ophioglossaceæ. The prothallium differs from that of all
other Ferns in being subterranean, free from chlorophyll, pale and
tuberous. The stem is extremely short, with short internodes, most
frequently unbranched, vertical, and entirely buried in the ground
(Fig. 208 st). In several species (among which are the native ones)
one leaf is produced every year, which has taken three to four years
for its development. In Botrychium a closed, sheath-like basal part of
each leaf covers the subsequent leaves during their development. In
Ophioglossum and others each leaf has at its base an intrapetiolar,
cap-like sheath, which protects the succeeding leaf. The leaves are
of two kinds: (a) foliage, which in Ophioglossum vulgatum are
lanceolate and entire, but in Botrychium however, are pinnate (b in
Fig. 208 A, B); and (b) fertile, which are found facing the upper side
of the foliage-leaves. These latter in Ophioglossum are undivided
and spike-like (Fig. 209 A), but pinnate in Botrychium (Fig. 208 B).
Each foliage and fertile leaf are branches from the same petiole. The
large sporangia are placed laterally, and open by two valves. No
annulus is formed (Fig. 209).—Ophioglossum reproduces
vegetatively by adventitious buds on the roots.
Fig. 208.—A Ophioglossum vulgatum (Adder’s-tongue); B
Botrychium lunaria (Moonwort), both natural size; r-r roots; bs
leaf-stalk; st stem; b foliage-leaf; f fertile leaf.
Fig. 209.—Fertile
leaf of
Ophioglossum.
Three genera with about twelve species.
Order 2. Marattiaceæ are tropical Ferns, whose gigantic leaves
resemble those of the Polypodiaceæ, but have stipules in addition.
The sporangia are grouped in sori, situated on the lower side of the
leaves, the sporangia in each sorus being arranged either in two
rows or in a ring. In Angiopteris they are isolated (Fig. 210 A), but in
the other species (Kaulfussia, Danæa, Marattia), they are united,
and form “synangia” divided into a number of chambers
corresponding to the sporangia. These open by clefts or pores.
Marattia presents the highest development, as its sporangia are
completely united in a capsule-like synangium, which is closed until
maturity, and then opens by two valves. In each valve there is a row
of three to eleven sporangia, each opening by a slit towards the
inside (Fig. 210 B, C). An indusium encloses the sorus, except in
Kaulfussia; it is formed of flat and lobed hairs, which resemble the
hairs of the other portions of the leaves. In Angiopteris and Marattia
the indusium is very rudimentary; in Danæa it forms a kind of cupule.
The numerous fossil Marattiaceæ (15 genera, with 98 species) present similar
differences to those now living, but more various forms are found, for example,
with solitary free sporangia. Those now living are the last small remnant (4 genera
with only 23 species) of a once dominant family, which existed from very early
times, and whose culminating point was reached in the Kulm and Coal periods.
The Ophioglossaceæ appear also in the Kulm and Coal periods, and were
about as numerous as at the present time (presumably 2 genera, with 19 species).
Leptosporangiate Ferns appear however to have occurred first of all in the Trias-
formation.