Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PDF document
PDF document
•At this stage, the screening criteria are vague and rough, that become specific and
refined as project planning advances.
•During the preliminary screening to eliminate ideas, which prima facie are not
promising, it is required to look into the aspects such as:
16
Stakeholder Analysis
It is a process:
– To identify the people involved in and affected by the project
(stakeholders)
– To determine the opinion of the stakeholders and
– To facilitate their contribution to the project activities at all stages of
the project cycle.
❖ Stakeholders: - are people affected by the impact of an activity & people
who can influence the impact of an activity
• Stakeholders are:
❖ individuals or groups with a direct, significant and specific stake or
interest in a given territory or set of natural resources and, thus, in a
proposed project.
❖ People affected by the project
❖ People who can influence the impact of an activity
• Participation or stakeholder analysis seeks to identify the major interest
groups involved (all those affected by or involved) in the project. 17
• The project manager
Key players
• Is responsible for achieving project objectives.
• Manages the project:
– Planning, organizing, leading, controlling (monitoring progress)
– Sharing success, accepts all blame!
• Sponsor– the person or group that provides the financial resources, in cash
or kind, for the project
– Project Initiator
• Customer/user/client– the person or organization that will use the project/s
product.
• Performing organization—the enterprise whose employees are most
directly involved in doing the work of the project.
• Project team members– the group that is performing the work of the
project
• Project management team– the members of the project team who are
directly involved in project management activities
• Potential opponents: Groups which may oppose or obstruct a project.
• Supplier-- Provides resources 18
Stakeholder Analysis
• It is a four-step process
1. Identify key stakeholders
2. Assess stakeholder interests and the potential impact of the
project on these interests (expectations, benefits, willingness
to mobilize resources, interests)
3. Assess the stakeholder influence and importance (power,
control of strategic resources)
4. Outline stakeholder participation strategy
19
Stakeholder Analysis
• Why stakeholder analysis:
– To identify stakeholders’ interests in, importance to, and
influence over the operation
– To identify local institutions and processes upon which to
build
– To provide a foundation and strategy for participation
– To develop a strategic view of the human and
institutional situation, and the relationship between the
different stakeholders and the objectives identified.
– provides a useful starting point for problem analysis.
– It involves the identification of all stakeholder groups
likely to be affected (either positively or negatively) 20
Identifying stakeholders
Core issue
21
Problem Analysis
• What is the problem to be addressed?
• What as the event or series of events that was a catalyst for
action?
• Is it a problem or crisis that demands immediate attention?
• Is the problem one of national security, economic
development, diplomacy?
• What interests are at stake for the actor (e.g. state)overall?
22
Problem Analysis
• State the problem meaningfully:
• Determine the magnitude and extent of the problem
• Continually re-define the problem in light of what is
possible
• Question the accepted thinking about the problem
• Question initial formulations of the problem
• Say it with data
• Clear definitions allow people to communicate with one
another
• Measures are important for clarification (e.g., how many
people are living in poverty)
• Often have different ways to measure problems
• Quantification 23
Problem Analysis
• Politics of problem definition
– Based on perspectives
• What will change in the future?
– Projections and forecasting
• Think about causes
– Must ask why the problem came about
– Answers may help determine how to resolve problem
• Often problems have multiple causes; conflict over which one to
addressTo establish the hierarchy of problems in the light of the
cause and effect relationships to find the focal problem
• Identification of priority problem
• Problem analysis
– Problem tree
– Solution tree
• Linking the solution tree to Log frame (we will discuss this under
Planning)
24
Problem Analysis
• Steps in problem analysis:
1. Agree on the main problem
2. Identify the causes of the main problem by asking
‘But why?’
3. Identify the effects of the main problem by asking
‘So what?’ until we can go no further.
4. Copy the complete tree on a paper
• Establishing a hierarchy of problems in a problem
tree helps to form a base for the objectives.
25
ProblemTree
Relationships Causes and Effects
EFFECTS
CAUSES
26
Objective Analysis
It’s a process to
27
From Problem to Objective/solution
Problem Objective
28
Objective Tree
▪Technique to describe the future situation that will be achieved by
solving the problems
▪Turning negative conditions into positive in a certain time
.
Overall Objective ENDS
Project
objectives
Outputs MEANS
Activities
29
30
OBJECTIVE TREE ANALYSIS: QUIZ
Impacts
Long Term
consequences
Immediate
consequence
s
Secondary
causes
Immediate
causes
Root 31
Causes
Strategy Analysis
•The final stage of the analysis phase involves the selection of
the strategy(ies) which will be used to achieve the desired
objectives.
33
Criteria of Choosing a Project Selection Model
⚫ The following criteria are used when choosing a project selection model.
a) Realism: the model should reflect the reality of the firm’s decision
situation. The firm’s limitations on facilities, capital, personnel, technical
and market risks, performance, cost, etc should be taken into account.
b) Capability: the model should be sophisticated enough to deal with the
relevant factors, multiple time periods, internal and external situations,
(interest rates, etc).
c) Flexibility: the model should give valid results within the range of
conditions that the firm might experience. It should be easy to modify in
response to changes in the firm’s environment (e.g., new technological
advancements, new laws)
d) Ease of use: the model should be reasonably convenient, not take a long
time to execute and be easy to use and understand.
e) Cost: data gathering and modeling costs should be low relative to the cost
of the project
f) Easy computerization: it should be easy and convenient to gather and
store the information in a computer database, and to manipulate data in the
model through the use of a widely available, standard computer package
such as Excel. 34
Project Identification & Screening
• Needs identification is the initial phase of the project life cycle.
⚫ A project can be conceived on the basis of:
⚫ Needs – to make available to all people in an area minimum amount of
certain basic material requirements or services.
⚫ A needs assessment survey establishes the urgency for intervention;
⚫ Market demand –domestic or overseas;
⚫ Resource availability – opportunity to make profitable use of available
resource.
⚫ Technology – to make use of available technology
⚫ Natural calamity – hedging against the adverse effects of natural events
as drought or floods; and
⚫ Political consideration.
35
Top-Down Approach
• Projects are identified based on demands from beyond the
community.
• This may include directives from:
– international conventions (such as Kyoto
Protocol/climate change)
– international institutions or NGOs that have determined
particular priorities and thus projects
– national policy makers identifying projects that pertain to
party manifestos and/or national Formulations.
36
Advantages of Top-Down Approach
• It may be a rapid response to disasters like floods, war outbreak because
there is limited time and chance to consult the beneficiaries.
• It can be effective in providing important services like education, health,
water, roads etc.
• It can contribute to wider national or international objectives and goals
– and therefore potentially be part of a wider benefit
(as in the case of trans-boundary resources, such as climate, water or
others)
Limitations of Top-Down Approach
• Does not help in modifying strongly established ideas and beliefs of people.
• Assumes external individuals know better than the beneficiaries of the
service.
• Communities have little say in Planning process rendering approach devoid
of human resource development.
• Community develops dependency syndrome on outside assistance and does
not exploit their own potential.
• The development workers (change agents) become stumbling blocks to
people-led development
– tendency to impose their own biases, etc. on people.
37
Bottom-Up Approach
• In this approach community/beneficiaries are encouraged to
identify and Formulation the projects themselves with or without
outsiders.
• Advantages of Bottom-Up Approach
– Interveners accomplish more with limited resources since
people tend to safeguard what they have provided for
themselves.
– Develops people’s capacity to identify problems and needs
and to seek possible solutions to them.
– Provides opportunities of educating people.
– Helps people to work as a team and develop a “WE” attitude
- makes project progressive and sustainable.
– Resources are effectively managed; dependence reduces,
there is increased equity, initiative, accountability, financial
and economic discipline. 38
Limitations of Bottom-Up Approach
• Not always effective for projects that require urgency to
implement
• Time-consuming and requires patience and tolerance.
• People sometimes dislike approach because they do not want
to take responsibility for action.
• The agency using this approach is never in control and
cannot guarantee the results it would want.
• The priorities of communities may not fit with national or
international priorities that seek to have a broader impact
39
PROBLEMS IN PROJECT
IDENTIFICATION
Ambiguity about the development objectives of the country
Priority issues in the existing development objectives
Limited information and data and obstacles in data/information
flow and accessibility
Conflict of interest between local beneficiary group: (i.e. some
groups may bear the cost and others may get the benefit)