Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full download John Webster: The Shape and Development of His Theology: The Shape and Development of His Theology Jordan Senner file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download John Webster: The Shape and Development of His Theology: The Shape and Development of His Theology Jordan Senner file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download John Webster: The Shape and Development of His Theology: The Shape and Development of His Theology Jordan Senner file pdf all chapter on 2024
https://ebookmass.com/product/john-webster-the-shape-and-
development-of-his-theology-jordan-senner/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-shape-of-motion-cinema-and-the-
aesthetics-of-movement-jordan-schonig/
https://ebookmass.com/product/john-the-theologian-and-his-
paschal-gospel-a-prologue-to-theology-first-edition-edition-behr/
https://ebookmass.com/product/athanasius-and-the-holy-spirit-the-
development-of-his-early-pneumatology-kevin-douglas-hill/
The Narrative Shape of Emotion in the Preaching of John
Chrysostom Blake Leyerle
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-narrative-shape-of-emotion-in-
the-preaching-of-john-chrysostom-blake-leyerle/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-narrative-shape-of-emotion-in-
the-preaching-of-john-chrysostom-blake-leyerle-2/
https://ebookmass.com/product/providence-and-narrative-in-the-
theology-of-john-chrysostom-robert-edwards/
https://ebookmass.com/product/patristic-theology-the-university-
lectures-of-fr-john-romanides-romanides/
JOHN WEBSTER
T&T Clark Studies in English Theology
Series editors
Karen Kilby
Michael Higton
Stephen R. Holmes
JOHN WEBSTER
Jordan Senner
T&T CLARK
Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
50 Bedford Square, London, WC1B 3DP, UK
1385 Broadway, New York, NY 10018, USA
29 Earlsfort Terrace, Dublin 2, Ireland
BLOOMSBURY, T&T CLARK and the T&T Clark logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
Bloomsbury Publishing Plc does not have any control over, or responsibility for,
any third-party websites referred to or in this book. All internet addresses given
in this book were correct at the time of going to press. The author and publisher
regret any inconvenience caused if addresses have changed or sites have
ceased to exist, but can accept no responsibility for any such changes.
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
To find out more about our authors and books visit www.bloomsbury.com
and sign up for our newsletters.
CONTENTS
Acknowledgementsvii
Abbreviationsix
Introduction1
Research parameters 4
Secondary literature 5
Chapter 1
ORDERING AND GROUNDING THE GOD-CREATURE RELATION 9
1.1 Introduction 9
1.2 Christocentric approach to the God-creature relation 10
1.3 Trinitarian approach to the God-creature relation 13
1.4 Theocentric approach to the God-creature relation 19
1.5 Key aspects of Webster’s mature theology of the God-creature
relation25
1.5.1 Doctrine of divine perfection 26
1.5.2 Theory of mixed relations 30
1.5.3 Concept of dual causality 36
1.6 Conclusion 42
Chapter 2
CHRISTOLOGY 45
2.1 Introduction 45
2.2 Early Christology: Divine identity and narrative description 46
2.3 Christology in transition: The priority of God in se53
2.4 Mature Christology: Divine perfection and metaphysical
distinction60
2.5 Excursus: Narrative description and metaphysical ambition 76
2.6 Conclusion 81
Chapter 3
ECCLESIOLOGY 83
3.1 Introduction 83
3.2 Early ecclesiology: Coinherence and continuity 84
3.3 Ecclesiology in transition: Trinitarian deduction 87
3.4 Ecclesiology in transition: Divine perfection 96
3.5 Mature ecclesiology: Distinction and mediation 104
3.6 Conclusion 113
vi Contents
Chapter 4
BIBLIOLOGY 115
4.1 Introduction 115
4.2 Holy Scripture (2003) 116
4.2.1 Dogmatic location of Scripture and its readers 116
4.2.2 Theological ontology of Scripture 118
4.2.3 Ecclesiology and anthropology of reading 126
4.2.4 Summary 133
4.3 Domain of the Word (2012) 134
4.3.1 Dogmatic location of Scripture and its readers 134
4.3.2 Theological ontology of Scripture 137
4.3.3 Ecclesiology and anthropology of reading 142
4.4 Conclusion 146
Chapter 5
THEOLOGICAL THEOLOGY 149
5.1 Introduction 149
5.2 Thomas Burns Lectures (1998) 150
5.2.1 Dogmatic location of reason 151
5.2.2 Theological anthropology of the theologian 155
5.2.3 Operations of reason 158
5.3 Summary 161
5.4 God without Measure (2016) 164
5.4.1 Cognitive principles of reason 165
5.4.2 Dogmatic location and anthropology of the theologian 166
5.4.3 Operations of reason 174
5.5 Conclusion 177
Conclusion179
Bibliography186
Index of names 198
Index of subjects 200
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The writing of this book was made possible by the support and encouragement of
friends, family and mentors. First, I would like to thank the Institute of Religion
and Culture (Canada) for awarding me a research grant in 2016. I hope this book
embodies some of the virtues of the institute’s founder, Jim Houston, whose passion
for the ‘personal’ has left its mark on a whole generation of students like me.
I wish to thank those professors, past and present, who have made significant
contributions to my theological formation: Mickey Klink, for first introducing me
to the ancient vision of a ‘pastor theologian’; Hans Boersma and Bruce Hindmarsh,
for showing me that reason and piety are coinherent realities; Tim Baylor, Steve
Holmes and Judith Wolfe, for guiding me through the PhD process with patience
and wisdom.
The community at St Andrews was a hospitable and vibrant place to engage in
the theological reflection that culminated in this book. A handful of friends and
conversation partners were particularly important companions on the journey:
Rebekah Earnshaw, Jared Michelson, David Westfall, Kim Kroll, Simon Dürr,
Christa McKirland, Dennis Bray, and last but not least, my golf-partner Matt
McKirland. It has been a privilege to know these people not only as academics but
also as brothers and sisters in Christ.
Theology is an ecclesial science, done in and for the church. So I would like to
thank the clergy of the Anglican Network in Canada for believing that stepping
away from full-time pastoral responsibilities for the sake of study could be a gift
to the church in the long run. And I would like to thank Saint Andrews Episcopal
Church and Holy Trinity Anglican Church for giving me the privilege of preaching
the gospel and praying with them, and for reminding me that the church (in all her
diversity and permutations) belongs to God.
I owe a debt of gratitude to my parents, whose prayer and financial support
have made all of my education possible, regardless of whether they understood
why I would possibly want to study that long. Their ability to bless their children
and grandchildren amidst significant geographical distance has been a wonder
and joy. My in-laws have been a source of practical support and encouragement,
knowing well the demands that academic work places on both scholar and family.
Finally, I would like to thank my family. My children, Annabelle and Jeremy,
have been a source of many sacred interruptions – just what a theologian needs
to be reminded that life is about much more than grand ideas. They have been
persistent in their requests that I pay attention to the ladybirds, watch their dance
shows, read a few books and play at the park. They have borne with an occasionally
absent-minded father, expressed excitement over the prospect of ‘reading’ my
book and reminded me that the kingdom of God belongs to those who are like
these ‘little ones’.
viii Acknowledgements
My wife, Susie, deserves more gratitude and credit than I can give. She sacrificed
the comfort of home in order to go on this intellectual and ministerial journey
and has managed not only to survive but also to bless the community around her.
She has listened to many theological ramblings, corrected far too many typos and
allowed me to spend many evenings in the office. More than all this, she has been
a faithful friend, loving companion and image of God’s goodness.
Someone once said, ‘To whom much has been given, much will be required.’ By
God’s grace, I have been given much.
ABBREVIATIONS
ATR Anglican Theological Review
Barth John Webster. Barth. London: Continuum, 2000.
BER John Webster. Barth’s Ethics of Reconciliation. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-
versity Press, 1995.
BMT John Webster. Barth’s Moral Theology: Human Action in Barth’s Thought.
Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1998.
CD Karl Barth. Church Dogmatics. 14 Volumes. Translated by G. W. Bromiley.
Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1936ff.
CG John Webster. Confessing God: Essays in Christian Dogmatics II. London:
Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2005.
DW John Webster. The Domain of the Word: Scripture and Theological Reason.
London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2012.
GIH John Webster. God Is Here: Believing in the Incarnation Today. Hampshire:
Marshall Morgan & Scott, 1983.
GWM John Webster. God without Measure: Working Papers in Christian Theology. 2
Volumes. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2016.
EJ John Webster. Eberhard Jüngel: An Introduction to His Theology. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 1986.
Holiness John Webster. Holiness. London: SCM Press, 2003.
HS John Webster. Holy Scripture: A Dogmatic Sketch. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2003.
IJST International Journal of Systematic Theology
MoTh Modern Theology
NB New Blackfriars
SJT Scottish Journal of Theology
ST Thomas Aquinas. Summa Theologiae. Latin/English Edition of the Works of
St. Thomas Aquinas. Volumes 13–20. Translated by Fr. Laurence Shapcote,
O.P. Edited by John Mortensen and Enrique Alarcón. Lander, WY: The
Aquinas Institute for the Study of Sacred Doctrine, 2012.
WC John Webster. Word and Church: Essays in Christian Dogmatics. London:
Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2001.
x
I N T R O DU C T IO N
observed about Barth’s early theology holds true for his own theology: the topics
that drew his attention ‘were those in which the character of God’s relation to
creatures assumes great importance’.3 For Webster, this included Christology,
ecclesiology, bibliology, moral theology, the nature of theology and much more.
Thus, the God-creature relation will provide a helpful vantage point from which
to view the systematic shape and logic of his theology. It will also provide an
opportunity to trace the development of his thought over time, for changes in
Webster’s understanding of the God-creature relation are often indicative of
larger shifts in his thought concerning the order and interrelation of doctrines,
especially judgements about what constitutes the ‘material epicentre’ of Christian
doctrine.
Therefore, Chapter 1 will be devoted to mapping the material and architectural
developments in Webster’s theology that shape his understanding of the God-
creature relation. In particular, I will seek to convey the ways in which his evolving
conception of the ‘material centre’ and ‘heuristic key’ of Christian theology
shapes the way he grounds, contextualizes and depicts the relation-in-distinction
between God and creatures. The first half of the chapter will map the development
of Webster’s thought in terms of three phases – Christocentric, Trinitarian and
Theocentric – whereby the ‘material centre’ that governs his theology shifts from
Christology to the economic Trinity, and finally, to the immanent perfection of
God. The second half of the chapter will offer a conceptual analysis of three aspects
of Webster’s mature theology – his doctrine of divine perfection, theory of mixed
relations and concept of dual causality – that are pivotal to his mature way of
framing and characterizing the relation-in-distinction between God and creatures.
In this way, Chapter 1 will propose a heuristic framework for interpreting Webster’s
theology, the defence of which will be the purview of Chapters 2–5.
Chapters 2–5 will explore different aspects of Webster’s account of the God-
creature relation: Christology (hypostatic relation), ecclesiology (redemptive
relation), bibliology (communicative relation) and theological theology (rational
relation). Chapter 2 will offer an analysis of Webster’s Christology with a particular
focus on the hypostatic union. I will argue that his understanding of the relation
between the divine and human natures of Christ evolves from an emphasis on
indivisibility and identity to an emphasis on distinction and asymmetry. This
occurs as the theological ground of Jesus’ unsubstitutable identity shifts from
his human history to the immanent life of God. Moreover, I will argue that these
developments reflect a larger movement in his thought regarding the relation
between theology and economy, which is also mirrored in his understanding of
the relation between narrative description and metaphysical ambition. The result
is a Christology that seeks to register the divine depth and salvific efficacy of Jesus’
human history.
Chapter 3 will offer an analysis of Webster’s ecclesiology. I will argue that
his understanding of the relation between God and the church evolves from
3. John Webster, Barth’s Earlier Theology: Four Studies (London: T&T Clark, 2005), 12.
Introduction 3
4. At the most basic level, God’s perfection is ‘inclusive’ if his relation to or activity in
the world is somehow intrinsic or integral to his fullness and ‘exclusive’ if no aspect of his
beatitude or fullness would be lost were the world not to exist.
4 John Webster
Research parameters
First, the primary subject matter of this book is the internal logic and development
of Webster’s theological ideas, not his biographical narrative or social and
historical setting, although I hope my work reflects an appropriate awareness of
these. This means, for example, that I will not devote much space to explaining
the socio-political dynamics of intellectual life at Cambridge during Webster’s
years as a student or to discussing the influence of his friendship with George
Schner while teaching at Wycliffe College in Canada. My discussion of his context
will be limited to the realm of intellectual ideas, drawing attention to particular
theologians or movements insofar as they influenced or provide an illuminating
contrast to his thought.
Second, this book will focus on Webster’s constructive theology and on his
historical theology (e.g. his many books on Jüngel and Barth) only insofar as it
Introduction 5
sheds light on Webster’s own theological development.5 On the one hand, this
means I will not engage in many questions related to the accuracy of Webster’s
interpretation of these German theologians, leaving that task to experts in
Jüngelian and Barthian theology. On the other hand, this means I will have space
to engage constructive works from the 1980 to 90s – for example, Webster’s first
published monograph (God Is Here: Believing in the Incarnation Today (1983))
and his first lecture series (Thomas Burns Lectures (1998)) – that have remained
hidden in the shadow of Webster’s historical scholarship during this period.
Third, this book intends to build an argument regarding the explanatory power
of the heuristic framework developed in Chapter 1. But I hope my work displays
an appropriate sense of the limitations and provisionality of the framework as
well as a sensitivity to the complexities of Webster’s theological development.
Evaluative judgements of Webster’s dogmatic theology will be kept to a minimum
in an effort to foreground its inner logic. This book intends to make a synthetic
and synchronic proposal about how to read Webster’s theology as whole, since no
such proposal exists to date, but it does so in the hopes that others will confirm its
strengths, reveal its weaknesses and push the field of Webster scholarship forward
in the years to come.
Secondary literature
5. Webster professed that his historical engagement with the theology of Karl Barth
was driven by constructive theological questions: ‘[M]y chief interest in reading and
commenting on Barth has been and remains theological: What moved this person to speak
of God in these astonishing ways? What instruction may we take from his astonishment in
the matter of our own theological witness?’ (Barth’s Earlier Theology, viii). Webster was a
sympathetic, yet by no means uncritical, reader of Barth.
6. Darren Sarisky, ‘The Ontology of Scripture and the Ethics of Interpretation in the
Theology of John Webster’, IJST 21:1 (2019): 59. For secondary literature on Webster’s
bibliology, see Chapter 4.
7. For secondary literature on Webster’s ecclesiology, see Chapter 3; on the nature of
theology, see Chapter 5.
6 John Webster
East and Westerholm have written articles that are pertinent to the topic of this
book because they have sought to identify defining shifts in Webster’s theological
evolution.8 East argued that the primary shift occurs when the doctrine of the
Trinity replaces Christology as that which governs Webster’s theology. I agree with
East and seek to build upon his work in Chapter 1 by suggesting that we need to
think of a second defining shift for Webster, namely a shift within his Trinitarian
theology from a focus on the economy to a focus on God’s immanent life.
Westerholm, on the other hand, has identified a shift of a different sort. He argues
that Webster’s thought never abandons the ‘typically modern notion that human
being and activity are decisively illumined by the history in which they stand’.9
Thus, the defining shift in Webster’s thought (regarding the nature of theological
inquiry in particular) has to do with his conception of the kind of history in
which humans are located: from the ‘history of ideas’ to the ‘history of salvation’.10
Westerholm interprets other shifts in Webster’s thought – i.e. the increased
prominence of the doctrine of creation – as a secondary move by which Webster
seeks to secure the history of salvation from collapsing into mere contingency.
I think Westerholm has correctly brought issues related to Webster’s conception
of history to the fore, so I seek to build upon his work in Chapters 4 and 5 by
showing how the concept of ‘location’ plays a significant role in shaping Webster’s
bibliology and theological theology. Yet I will also suggest that Westerholm is not
quite accurate when he identifies a focus on the ‘history of ideas’ with Webster’s
thought in the ‘Theological Theology’ lecture (1997) and a focus on the ‘history
of salvation’ with his thought in God without Measure (2016). Instead, I will argue
that it is better to think of Webster as already locating human beings (and their
reasoning activities) primarily within the ‘history of salvation’ in the late 1990s,
but that his understanding of salvation history itself changes in subsequent years
8. Brad East, ‘John Webster, Theologian Proper’, ATR 99:2 (2017): 333–51; Martin
Westerholm, ‘On Webster’s God without Measure and the Practice of Theological Theology’,
IJST 19:4 (2017): 444–61. Michael Allen’s articles also offer helpful descriptions of aspects of
Webster’s development, yet their analysis runs rather close to the details of Webster’s texts
and thus do not offer much in terms of a heuristic by which to synthesize the underlying
currents of his thought (see ‘Toward Theological Theology: Tracing the Methodological
Principles of John Webster’, Themelios 41:2 (2016): 217–37; ‘Toward Theological
Anthropology: Tracing the Anthropological Principles of John Webster’, IJST 19:1 (2017):
6–29; ‘Reading John Webster: An Introduction’, in T&T Clark Reader in John Webster, ed.
Michael Allen (London: T&T Clark, 2020), 1–19).
9. Westerholm, ‘Practice of Theological Theology’, 447.
10. According to Westerholm, the former focuses on ‘some penultimate aspect of human
history’ (e.g. the rise of nominalism, German idealism or postmodernism), and the latter
on the moral and spiritual history of God’s relation with humanity. It is not a question of
either-or, but which one ‘provides the orienting context for theological work’ (Westerholm,
‘Practice of Theological Theology’, 451).
Introduction 7
as teaching about divine perfection, creation, providence and the Spirit takes on
more prominence in his thought.
This brings us, finally, to the excellent essays on Webster’s doctrine of God
penned by Katherine Sonderegger and Tyler Wittman.11 Sonderegger deftly draws
attention to the personalist elements in Webster’s doctrine of God, which I note
in Chapters 4 and 5. She also suggests that Webster’s desire to develop a non-
competitive account of the relation between theology and economy led him to
speak of the economy as somehow ‘included’ in God’s inner life. Sonderegger has
raised a central issue for understanding Webster’s account of the God-creature
relation. Yet, unlike Sonderegger, I am convinced that Webster’s mature account of
divine perfection (seen most clearly in his essays on the doctrine of creation) does
not conceive of the economy as ‘included’ in God’s inner life, although his earlier
accounts did. Like Wittman, I argue that Webster’s mature theology articulates an
‘exclusive’ account of God’s perfection, motivated in part by a desire to register
the qualitative distinction between theology and economy, which in turn funds
a gracious and non-competitive characterization of their relation. This reading of
Webster’s mature doctrine of God is laid out in nuce at the end of Chapter 1, to
which we now turn, and expanded upon in Chapters 2 and 3.
1.1 Introduction
This chapter is intended to function as an overture for the subsequent four chapters,
sketching the significant points of development in Webster’s thought that shape his
understanding of the relation between God and creatures. In particular, I will seek
to convey the ways in which Webster’s evolving conception of the ‘material centre’
and ‘heuristic key’ of Christian theology shapes the way he grounds, contextualizes
and depicts the relation-in-distinction between God and creatures. The narrative
I lay out here will be broad, attempting to give a sense of the whole. It will be
left to the subsequent four chapters to demonstrate the explanatory power of this
developmental narrative as well as offer a more detailed and nuanced analysis of
various aspects of Webster’s understanding of the God-creature relation. Hence,
I will not attempt to defend the framework in Chapter 1 (beyond offering a few
illustrative quotations); its defence will be the demonstration of its usefulness in
Chapters 2–5.
The argument of this chapter will unfold in two parts. The first half (Sections
1.2–1.4) will briefly map the development of Webster’s thought in terms of three
phases – Christocentric, Trinitarian and Theocentric – each of which is marked
by a distinctive account of which doctrine(s) constitutes the ‘material centre’ and
provides the ‘heuristic key’ for Christian theology as a whole and thereby orders
thought about the God-creature relation. This threefold schema identifies two
primary shifts in Webster’s thought that impact his understanding of the God-
creature relation: (1) a shift from Christology to the doctrine of the Trinity as
the cardinal Christian doctrine, and (2) a shift from the economic action of the
Trinity to the immanent perfection of the Trinity as the material epicentre of
Christian doctrine. There are other very significant developments – e.g. from an
eschatological doctrine of grace to a Thomist doctrine of creation as that which
provides the most basic context within which to talk about the God-creature
relation – but they are corollaries of these primary shifts. The second half of the
chapter (Section 1.5) will offer a conceptual analysis of three aspects of Webster’s
mature theology – his doctrine of divine perfection, theory of mixed relations
and concept of dual causality – that are pivotal to his mature way of framing and
characterizing the relation-in-distinction between God and creatures. In this
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
THE TEMPLE OF
THE GOD OF LITERATURE
AT MUKDEN
THE TEMPLE OF
THE FOX, MUKDEN.
Found all over the country, and commonly known as “Joss Houses.”
There is an idol in each of them. They are of interest as presenting a
similar feature to the shrine and wayside crucifixes found all over
Catholic countries in Europe.
A WAYSIDE SHRINE
A WAYSIDE SHRINE
THE FICUS RELIGIOSA.
A kind of banyan tree found in every village of the South and South
Central Provinces of China. Its foliage covers an enormous extent of
ground. The tree itself is an object of worship, and an altar for the
burning of incense is always found beneath it.
THE FICUS RELIGIOSA
THE ALTAR OF
HEAVEN.