Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full download Water - Energy - Food Nexus Narratives and Resource Securities Tafadzwa Mabhaudhi file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download Water - Energy - Food Nexus Narratives and Resource Securities Tafadzwa Mabhaudhi file pdf all chapter on 2024
https://ebookmass.com/product/sustainable-food-waste-to-energy-
systems-babbitt/
https://ebookmass.com/product/sexual-and-reproductive-health-of-
adolescents-with-disabilities-tafadzwa-rugoho/
https://ebookmass.com/product/current-developments-in-
biotechnology-and-bioengineering-sustainable-food-waste-
management-resource-recovery-and-treatment-jonathan-wong/
https://ebookmass.com/product/integrated-sustainable-urban-water-
energy-and-solids-managementpresents-an-integrated-and-
sustainable-system-of-vladimir-novotny/
The Survival Nexus: Science, Technology, and World
Affairs Charles Weiss
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-survival-nexus-science-
technology-and-world-affairs-charles-weiss/
https://ebookmass.com/product/wiley-series-57-securities-
licensing-exam-review-2020-test-bank-the-securities-trader-
examination-1st-edition-the-securities-institute-of-america/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-nexus-knight-a-lit-thriller-
adventure-the-nexus-games-book-2-1st-edition-shami-stovall/
https://ebookmass.com/product/biopolymer-membranes-and-films-
health-food-environment-and-energy-applications-1st-edition-
mariana-agostini-de-moraes-editor/
https://ebookmass.com/product/saving-food-production-supply-
chain-food-waste-and-food-consumption-galanakis/
Water - Energy - Food
Nexus Narratives and
Resource Securities
A Global South Perspective
Edited by
Tafadzwa Mabhaudhi
Centre for Transformative Agricultural and Food Systems (CTAFS), School of Agricultural, Earth and
Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa; International Water
Management Institute (IWMI-GH) e West Africa Office, Accra, Ghana
Aidan Senzanje
School of Engineering, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa;
Centre for Water Resources Research, College of Agriculture,
Engineering and Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
Albert Modi
Centre for Transformative Agricultural and Food Systems (CTAFS), School of Agricultural, Earth and
Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
Graham Jewitt
IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Delft, the Netherlands;
Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands;
Centre for Water Resources Research, School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences,
University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN), Durban, South Africa
Festo Massawe
School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Jalan Broga, Seminyih, Malaysia; Centre for
Transformative Agricultural and Food Systems (CTAFS), School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental
Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
Elsevier
Radarweg 29, PO Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, Netherlands
The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, United Kingdom
50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical,
including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from
the publisher. Details on how to seek permission, further information about the Publisher’s permissions policies and our
arrangements with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency, can be
found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions.
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the Publisher (other than as
may be noted herein).
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience broaden our
understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical treatment may become necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating and using any
information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such information or methods they should
be mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including parties for whom they have a professional responsibility.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors, assume any liability for any
injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or
operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein.
ISBN: 978-0-323-91223-5
Dhesigen Naidoo
We live in an age of paradox. Never before have we have such a comprehensive toolbox. Science and
technology have afforded us a level of local and global connectivity unimagined in history. There is
hardly a village in the world, even in the most rural and extreme settings, which does not have some
level of access to the information superhighway. It is estimated that 4.66 billion people have Internet
access, and 4.32 billion people have access to a mobile device.
And yet, at the same time, UN-Water reminds us that 2 billion people still do not have access to safe
water, and 3.66 billion need improved sanitation. Nearly half the schools in the world have no safe
handwashing facilities. UNICEF estimates that 700 under-5’s die each day from diarrheal diseases
related to unsafe water and sanitation. In fact, in the world’s major conflict zones, under-5’s are 20 times
more likely to die from ailments related to unclean water than the conflict itself.
In the domain of food security, we have seen the COVID-19 pandemic pushback on vital gains as all the
major statistics showing increases. We now have 811m or 9.9% of the global population suffering from
hunger (up from 8.4% in 2019). With the continued pandemic, this number is rising. As the UN Food
Summit has now passed, we are still faced with the reality that 2.3 billion people do not have year-
round access to food and are food insecure. When we delve into the domain of nutritional security
and malnutritional, this number enters the realm of alarming.
Global access to energy initiatives has made great gains. However, by 2019 the IEA, IRENA and the UN
System estimated that 759 million people still did not have access to reliable energy. Some 2.6 billion
still did not have access to clean cooking facilities. We also know that this number will increase further
on the back of the new burdens introduced by COVID-19. There are potentially further challenges to
achieving the Just Transition from a fossil fueledominated energy system to a low-carbon global
economy.
It is abundantly clear that new approaches have to dominate the recovery from the pandemic and
catalyze the actions needed to get close to the Sustainable Development Goals by 2030. Key among
xvii
xviii Foreword
1. Introduction
The watereenergyefood (WEF) nexus has grown into an important transfor-
mative and circular approach since 2011 when it was presented at the World
Economic Forum by the Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) in anticipation
of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which came into effect in 2015
(FAO, 2014; Hoff, 2011; UNGA, 2015). This was the same period when the
SDGs were being formulated in response to the continued insecurity of water,
energy, and food resources (FAO, 2014; Liphadzi et al., 2021). The three re-
sources, termed WEF resources, are vital for human well-being, poverty reduc-
tion, and sustainable development, the reason why all the 17 SDGs are
developed around the three resources (Mabhaudhi et al., 2021; UNGA,
2015). The need for the formulation of the SDGs mainly around the WEF re-
sources was also motivated by global projections indicating that the demand
for the three resources will increase significantly in the coming years due to
population growth, economic development, international trade, urbanization,
diversifying diets, depletion of natural resources, technological advances, and
climate change (FAO, 2014; Hoff, 2011). This is happening at a time when re-
sources are depleting due to climate change (Mpandeli et al., 2018). As a result,
1
Water - Energy - Food Nexus Narratives and Resource Securities. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91223-5.00004-6
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
2 CHAPTER 1: The watereenergyefood nexus
FIGURE 1.1
The main contents covered in the chapter in understanding nexus planning.
the SDGs in 2015, this chapter also discusses the definition of nexus planning,
providing reasons for its rapid growth and prominence in recent years and
highlighting the benefits of adopting the approach, particularly in assessing
and achieving the 2030 global agenda of SDGs. This is based on the declaration
of the United Nations General Assembly’s (UNGA), which states that: “The
interlinkages and integrated nature of the Sustainable Development Goals are of
crucial importance in ensuring that the purpose of the new Agenda is realized”
(UNGA, 2015). The chapter outline (Fig. 1.1) seeks to also identify the various
types of nexus planning and the benefits of operationalizing the approach.
FIGURE 1.2
The three-way interconnectedness between water, energy, and food resources.
(WHEN) nexus, among others (Lehmann, 2018; Nhamo and Ndlela, 2020;
Nhamo et al., 2021b; Willis, 2015). The existence of many nexuses indicates
the need to assess and manage interlinked sectors holistically without priori-
tizing one above the others (Nhamo and Ndlela, 2020). Thus, the WEF nexus
is only one of the many nexuses that have been established (Nhamo and
Ndlela, 2020; Willis, 2015). As there are many nexus types, the concept has
evolved from a narrow term of WEF nexus to broader nexus planning (Mab-
haudhi et al., 2021; Nhamo and Ndlela, 2020).
The WEF nexus provides an opportunity for analyzing the trade-offs and syn-
ergies between various sectors to stimulate efficiency, mobilize resources, and
create opportunities for policy coherent among those sectors. This develop-
ment has eliminated the notion that any nexus type is always WEF nexus,
which is widely known. The broader term “nexus planning” emphasizes
2. The evolution of nexus planning 5
FIGURE 1.3
The progression of the WEF nexus concept before and after 2015 and its importance in achieving sustainable development by 2030.
specific resilience initiatives are often associated with systemic risks, which
emanate from strategies that lead to suboptimal efficiencies in one sector at
the expense of others (Madhav et al., 2017; Naidoo et al., 2021a).
The COVID-19 experiences have exposed the limitations of the widely used
linear models. However, circular models such as nexus planning, circular econ-
omy, scenario planning, and sustainable food systems have emerged as alterna-
tive approaches to the existing linear ones that have now been shown to have
reached their physical limitations (Hofstetter et al., 2021). The disruptions
caused by the COVID-19 pandemic have further exposed the fragility of linear
models in addressing today’s complex, cross-cutting, and interconnected chal-
lenges (Ibn-Mohammed et al., 2020; Naidoo et al., 2021a). The pandemic
caused immense disruptions in all sectors of the economy while policy- and
decision-makers were proving reactive measures, focusing on the health sector.
The COVID-19 experience has demonstrated that focusing on a single sector
during a crisis only exacerbates the stressors in other sectors as decision-
makers have often viewed the world from a linear perspective, with the thought
that a click of a button would get the economy and society back on track
(Nhamo and Ndlela, 2020). Yet the lockdowns implemented during the
various COVID-19 waves resulted in job losses, company closures, and eco-
nomic recessions, demonstrating that linear approaches often overemphasize
a limited set of system attributes, notably efficiency, at the expense of other as-
pects (Ibn-Mohammed et al., 2020; Nhamo and Ndlela, 2020). While linear
approaches have been beneficial to some extent, the COVID-19 pandemic
and climate change have exposed how they transfer stresses to other sectors,
compromise resilience-building initiatives, weaken the adaptive capacity, and
allow failure to cascade from one sector to the other.
FIGURE 1.4
The advantages of adopting circular models over linear approaches in resource planning and management.
time was that other sectors should revolve around a supreme sector and should
direct the other sectors. This belief was compounded by the existing sector-
based policies sitting in siloed departments and ministries, a scenario that ag-
gravates contemporary crises by the optimal development of certain sectors at
the expense of other equally important sectors (Mpandeli et al., 2018; Nhamo
et al., 2018; Peters, 2018). An example of such a sector-based and monocentric
approach that dominated this period is the IWRM, which emphasizes that
everything should evolve around water or start and end from a water perspec-
tive (Garcia, 2008).
However, this viewpoint of nexus planning as a linear approach has changed
since 2015 with the promulgation of the SDGs. This period has witnessed a dy-
namic transitioning of the approach from only being a conceptual and
discourse framework into a useful analytical decision support tool that informs
strategic policy decisions for sustainable resource management (Daher and
Mohtar, 2015; Mabhaudhi et al., 2019; Naidoo et al., 2021b; Nhamo et al.,
2020a). To date, the approach has transitioned into a cross-sectoral, circular,
and transformative model advancing the transformational change agenda
and sustainable development (Mabhaudhi et al., 2021; Naidoo et al., 2021a;
Nhamo and Ndlela, 2020). It unpacks the intricate interlinkages between
distinct but related sectors, identifying priority areas for intervention
(Mabhaudhi et al., 2019; Nhamo et al., 2020a). It now forms an integral
part of initiatives aimed at achieving SDGs, mainly Goal 1 (poverty eradica-
tion), Goal 2 (zero hunger), Goal 6 (provision of water and sanitation), and
Goal 7 (access to affordable and reliable energy), but with linkages to the other
13 goals (Mabhaudhi et al., 2021). It has grown into an important tool essen-
tial for assessing progress done to achieve the SDGs. Thus, nexus planning pro-
vides the following sustainable attributes: (1) the promotion and guidance of
sustainable and efficient use of resources, (2) the provision of access to and
equal distribution of resources to all, and (3) enhance sustainable conservation
of the natural resource base (Liphadzi et al., 2021).
3. Benefits for adopting nexus planning 9
4. Concluding remarks
Nexus planning has evolved into an important transformative, circular, and in-
tegrated model for informing contemporary transformative systems, including
sustainable food systems, circular economy, scenario planning, SDGs progress
assessment, and livelihoods transformation. Since 2015, it has transitioned
into an indispensable decision support tool that provides evidence on complex
sustainability challenges. These developments have allowed nexus planning to
transition from a conceptual and discourse framework into an operational de-
cision support model. It has developed into a model that provides pathways
toward sustainable development and transformative solutions that lead to
resilience and adaptation. As a transformative approach that assesses the
spatiotemporal management of resources, it is vital to assess progress toward
SDGs. These attributes are enhanced by integrating other transformative ap-
proaches such as scenario planning, circular economy, and sustainable food
systems. However, it is essential to mention that nexus planning is not a
panacea of humankind’s many existing challenges. Still, it provides valuable in-
formation on resource management and sustainable development. It should
also be noted that WEF nexus does not intend or advance creating a mega nexus
ministry or department. It is a multistakeholder platform for related sectors to
discuss and develop cross-sectoral strategic policies and decisions. Lastly, it is
important to note that water, energy, and food production has historically
been managed independently with little consideration or cognizance of
cross-sectoral benefits or interactions.
References
Albrecht, T.R., Crootof, A., Scott, C.A., 2018. The Water-Energy-Food Nexus: a systematic review of
methods for nexus assessment. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 043002.
Biggs, E.M., Bruce, E., Boruff, B., Duncan, J.M., Horsley, J., Pauli, N., McNeill, K., Neef, A., Van
Ogtrop, F., Curnow, J., 2015. Sustainable development and the watereenergyefood nexus: a
perspective on livelihoods. Environ. Sci. Pol. 54, 389e397.
Boas, I., Biermann, F., Kanie, N., 2016. Cross-sectoral strategies in global sustainability governance:
towards a nexus approach. Int. Environ. Agreements Polit. Law Econ. 16, 449e464.
Braithwaite, J., Churruca, K., Long, J.C., Ellis, L.A., Herkes, J., 2018. When complexity science meets
implementation science: a theoretical and empirical analysis of systems change. BMC Med. 16,
1e14.
Clarke, A., Crane, A., 2018. Cross-sector partnerships for systemic change: systematized literature
review and agenda for further research. J. Bus. Ethics 150, 303e313.
Daher, B.T., Mohtar, R.H., 2015. Watereenergyefood (WEF) Nexus Tool 2.0: guiding integrative
resource planning and decision-making. Water Int. 40, 748e771.
FAO, 2014. The Water-energy-food Nexus: A New Approach in Support of Food Security and Sus-
tainable Agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Rome.
References 11
Ferroukhi, R., Nagpal, D., Lopez-Peña, A., Hodges, T., Mohtar, R.H., Daher, B., Mohtar, S.,
Keulertz, M., 2015. Renewable Energy in the Water, Energy & Food Nexus. The International
Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), Abu Dhabi.
Fogarassy, C., Finger, D., 2020. Theoretical and practical approaches of circular economy for busi-
ness models and technological solutions. Resources 9 (6), 76.
Fróna, D., Szenderák, J., Harangi-Rákos, M., 2019. The challenge of feeding the world. Sustainability
11, 5816.
Garcia, L.E., 2008. Integrated water resources management: a ‘small’step for conceptualists, a giant
step for practitioners. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 24, 23e36.
Giampietro, M., Mayumi, K., Ramos-Martin, J., 2009. Multi-scale integrated analysis of societal and
ecosystem metabolism (MuSIASEM): theoretical concepts and basic rationale. Energy 34,
313e322.
Grigg, N.S., 2019. IWRM and the nexus approach: versatile concepts for water resources education.
J. Contemp. Water Res. Educ. 166, 24e34.
Hellegers, P., Zilberman, D., Steduto, P., McCornick, P., 2008. Interactions between water, energy,
food and environment: evolving perspectives and policy issues. Water Pol. 10, 1e10.
Hoff, H., 2011. Understanding the Nexus: Background Paper for the Bonn 2011 Conference: The
Water, Energy and Food Security Nexus. Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI), Stockholm.
Hofstetter, J.S., De Marchi, V., Sarkis, J., Govindan, K., Klassen, R., Ometto, A.R., Spraul, K.S.,
Bocken, N., Ashton, W.S., Sharma, S., 2021. From sustainable global value chains to circular
economyddifferent silos, different perspectives, but many opportunities to build bridges.
Circ. Econ. Sustain. 1, 21e47.
Ibn-Mohammed, T., Mustapha, K., Godsell, J., Adamu, Z., Babatunde, K., Akintade, D., Acquaye, A.,
Fujii, H., Ndiaye, M., Yamoah, F., 2020. A critical review of the impacts of COVID-19 on the
global economy and ecosystems and opportunities for circular economy strategies. Resour.
Conserv. Recycl. 164, 105169.
IEA, 2016. Energy and Air Pollution: World Energy Outlook Special Report 2016. International En-
ergy Agency (IEA), Paris.
Jørgensen, S., Pedersen, L.J.T., 2018. The circular rather than the linear economy. In: Shrivastava, P.,
Zsolnai, L. (Eds.), RESTART Sustainable Business Model Innovation. Springer, Geneva,
Switzerland, pp. 103e120.
Khan, S., Hanjra, M.A., 2009. Footprints of water and energy inputs in food productioneGlobal
perspectives. Food Pol. 34, 130e140.
Lehmann, S., 2018. Implementing the Urban Nexus approach for improved resource-efficiency of
developing cities in Southeast-Asia. City Cult. Soc. 13, 46e56.
Liphadzi, S., Mpandeli, S., Mabhaudhi, T., Naidoo, D., Nhamo, L., 2021. The evolution of the
watereenergyefood nexus as a transformative approach for sustainable development in South
Africa. In: Muthu, S. (Ed.), The WatereEnergyeFood Nexus: Concept and Assessments.
Springer, Kowloon, Hong Kong, pp. 35e67.
Mabhaudhi, T., Nhamo, L., Chibarabada, T.P., Mabaya, G., Mpandeli, S., Liphadzi, S., Senzanje, A.,
Naidoo, D., Modi, A.T., Chivenge, P.P., 2021. Assessing progress towards sustainable develop-
ment goals through nexus planning. Water 13, 1321.
Mabhaudhi, T., Nhamo, L., Mpandeli, S., Nhemachena, C., Senzanje, A., Sobratee, N.,
Chivenge, P.P., Slotow, R., Naidoo, D., Liphadzi, S., 2019. The watereenergyefood nexus as
a tool to transform rural livelihoods and well-being in southern Africa. Int. J. Environ. Res.
Publ. Health 16, 2970.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
Medium 8vo, 800 pp.
Just Ready.
Cloth. Price 21s. net.
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the
United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms
of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying,
performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this
work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes
no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in
any country other than the United States.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of
other ways including checks, online payments and credit card
donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.