Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full download Austria 1867-1955 John W. Boyer file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download Austria 1867-1955 John W. Boyer file pdf all chapter on 2024
Boyer
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmass.com/product/austria-1867-1955-john-w-boyer/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
https://ebookmass.com/product/analog-7-1967-by-john-w-campbell-
ed-john-w-campbell-ed/
https://ebookmass.com/product/political-economy-of-
capitalisms-1st-edition-robert-boyer/
https://ebookmass.com/product/john-websters-borrowing-r-w-dent/
https://ebookmass.com/product/wideband-microwave-materials-
characterization-john-w-schultz/
Medical Biochemistry 5th Edition John W. Baynes
https://ebookmass.com/product/medical-biochemistry-5th-edition-
john-w-baynes/
https://ebookmass.com/product/children-thirteenth-edition-
edition-john-w-santrock/
https://ebookmass.com/product/additive-manufacturing-for-the-
aerospace-industry-francis-froes-rodney-boyer/
https://ebookmass.com/product/1000-mate-in-1-2-3-chess-puzzles-
volume-1-john-w-edwards-2020-tls-john-w-edwards/
https://ebookmass.com/product/life-span-development-john-w-
santrock/
OXFORD HISTORY OF MODERN EUROPE
General Editors
LORD BULLOCK AND SIR WILLIAM DEAKIN
Austria, 1867–1955
Austria, 1867–1955 connects the political history of German-speaking provinces of
the Habsburg Empire before 1914 (Vienna and the Alpine lands) with the history
of the Austrian Republic that emerged in 1918. John W. Boyer presents the case of
modern Austria as a fascinating example of democratic nation-building. The con-
struction of an Austrian political nation began in 1867 under Habsburg Imperial
auspices, with the German-speaking bourgeois Liberals defining the concept of a
political people (Volk) and giving that Volk a constitution and a liberal legal and
parliamentary order to protect their rights against the Crown. The decades that
followed saw the administrative and judicial institutions of the Liberal state solidified,
but in the 1880s and 1890s the membership of the Volk exploded to include new
social and economic strata from the lower bourgeoisie and the working classes.
Ethnic identity was not the final structuring principle of everyday politics, as it was
in the Czech lands. Rather social class, occupational culture, and religion became
more prominent variables in the sortition of civic interests, exemplified by the
emergence of two great ideological parties, Christian Socialism and Social
Democracy, in Vienna in the 1890s. The war crisis of 1914/1918 exploded the
Empire, with the Crown self-destructing in the face of military defeat, chronic
domestic unrest, and bitter national partisanship. But this crisis also accelerated the
emergence of new structures of democratic self-governance in the German-speaking
Austrian lands, enshrined in the republican Constitution of 1920. Initial attempts to
make this new project of democratic nation-building work failed in the 1920s and
1930s, culminating in the catastrophe of the 1938 Nazi occupation. After 1945 the
surviving legatees of the Revolution of 1918 reassembled under the four-power Allied
occupation, fashioning a shared political culture which proved sufficiently flexible to
accommodate intense partisanship, resulting, by the 1970s, in a successful republican
system. This system was organized under the aegis of elite democratic and corporatist
negotiating structures, in which the Catholics and Socialists learned to embrace the
skills of collective but shared self-governance.
John W. Boyer is the Martin A. Ryerson Distinguished Service Professor in
History at the University of Chicago and an Editor of the Journal of Modern
History. A specialist in Central European history, Boyer has written three books in
the field of Austrian political and social history, most recently Karl Lueger
(1844–1910): Christlichsoziale Politik als Beruf, published in 2010. In 2015 he
published The University of Chicago: A History. Boyer has received the Cross of
Honor for Science and Art, First Class, from the Republic of Austria, in recogni-
tion of his scholarly work on the Habsburg Empire. He is also a Corresponding
Member of the Austrian Academy of Sciences. Since 1992 he has served as Dean of
the College at the University of Chicago.
OXFORD HISTORY OF MODERN EUROPE
The Shock of America
Europe and the Challenge of the Century
David Ellwood
The Triumph of the Dark
European International History 1933–1939
Zara Steiner
The Lights that Failed
European International History 1919–1933
Zara Steiner
Bulgaria
R. J. Crampton
A People Apart
The Jews in Europe, 1789–1939
David Vital
Rumania 1866–1947
Keith Hitchins
German History, 1770–1866
James J. Sheehan
Austria, 1867–1955
JOHN W. BOYER
Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP,
United Kingdom
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship,
and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of
Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries
© John W. Boyer 2022
The moral rights of the author have been asserted
First Edition published in 2022
Impression: 1
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in
a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the
prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted
by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics
rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the
above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the
address above
You must not circulate this work in any other form
and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer
Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press
198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Data available
Library of Congress Control Number: 2022935995
ISBN 978–0–19–822129–6
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198221296.001.0001
Printed and bound by
CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY
Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and
for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials
contained in any third party website referenced in this work.
This book is for my children and grandchildren
Contents
Acknowledgments ix
List of Abbreviations xi
Bibliography 981
Index 1091
Acknowledgments
This book is the result of many years of archival and library research, undertaken
in Vienna, Oxford, London, Munich, and Chicago. As noted in the Introduction,
the assignment was all the more challenging because the book seeks to bridge the
traditional (and formidable) boundary of 1918, connecting the history of the
Habsburg Empire with that of the Austrian Republics in a systematic way.
I am grateful to Margarete Grandner, Lothar Höbelt, Oliver Rathkolb, James
Sheehan, Guenter Bischof, John Deak, Jonathan Lyon, Matti Bunzl, and Phillip
Henry for reading all of the manuscript or some of the individual chapters and for
offering suggestions for improvements and revisions.
Florian Wenninger, Leora Auslander, Doris Corradini, Helmut Wohnout,
Marija Wakounig, Jonathan Gumz, Berthold Molden, Leopold Kögler, Thomas
Grischany, Andreas Huber, and Rudolf Jeřábek also helped me obtain various
archival documents, for which I am also very grateful.
For many stimulating and enriching conversations in Vienna about Austria and
the Habsburg Monarchy I am in the debt of Gerald Stourzh, Margarete Grandner,
Lothar Höbelt, Oliver Rathkolb, Peter Becker, Lonnie Johnson, Helmut Wohnout,
Grete Klingenstein, Hans Petschar, Otmar Binder, Mitchell Ash, Anton Pelinka,
Thomas Grischany, Berthold Molden, Lucile Dreidemy, Florian Wenninger, and
the late Fritz Fellner.
In the United States I have profited greatly from fruitful discussions and debates
about Austria with Zachary Barr, Robert Beachy, Matthew Berg, Guenter Bischof,
Christof Brandtner, James Bjork, Gary Cohen, John Deak, Cate Giustino,
Jonathan Gumz, Paul Hanebrink, Maureen Healy, Phillip Henry, Derek
Hastings, Patrick Houlihan, Ke-Chin Hsia, Pieter Judson, Daniel Koehler,
Suzanne Marchand, Paul Silverman, Jonathan Sperber, Anthony Steinhoff, and
James Van Horn Melton.
My colleagues at Chicago, Leora Auslander, Paul Cheney, Constantin Fasolt,
Michael Geyer, Jan Goldstein, Hanna H. Gray, Jonathan Lyon, Robert Morrissey,
David Nirenberg, Christopher Wild, Tara Zahra, and the late Moishe Postone,
have created a stimulating scholarly community in which to think and write about
broad and challenging problems in European history. I have also profited from the
research assistance of a number of Chicago graduate students, including Nicholas
Huzsvai, Michael Ziegler, Ian Lewenstein, Jill Buccola, Eric Phillips, and Gerard
Siarny.
Cathryn Steele of Oxford University Press has been an unwavering and most
supportive editor, whose patience should be deemed legendary. Edwin Pritchard,
x
Jackie Pritchard, Joe Stupar, Marta Steele, Dominic Boyer, Dan Koehler, Dina
Rashed, Gerard Siarny, Sarah Walter, Chris Wild, and Gayathri Venkatesan
provided extraordinary help during the production process for the book.
Finally, my most profound debt is to Barbara Boyer, who has helped me in so
many crucial and discerning ways to be able to complete this project.
Austria, 1867–1955. John W. Boyer, Oxford University Press. © John W. Boyer 2022.
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198221296.003.0001
2 , –
and opportunity.¹ This would become the preeminent and classic struggle
confronting the Austrian state itself in the twentieth century.
The present book has been long in gestation and reflects many new primary
and secondary sources and competing perspectives involving the wider history of
the Empire and the Republic, but it does focus on the state-level politics and
administration in and around Vienna as key elements of its narrative. The history
of small Austria after 1918, emerging as part of large Austria before 1914, must be
framed in light of the many tensions between empire and nationhood that
emerged over the course of the nineteenth century. In recent years many scholars
have taken up these tensions afresh with new contributions about the ways in
which the Habsburg Empire was defined by ethnic/national regions that depended
on the Empire’s territorial unity for their relative economic well-being, but with
those regions also giving birth to nationalist and populist constituencies that,
paradoxically, brought the Empire to its knees in 1918.² In a contribution to the
longstanding debate about the nature and scope of the Austrian past Arno
Strohmeyer has wisely observed that “there is no ‘single’ Austrian history at the
present time, but rather this history has to be seen from the perspective of an
ensemble of different spatial narratives, with each its own developmental logic as
to its origins and evolution.”³ Maciej Janowski has argued that the Habsburg
Crown had a protean character, with the Empire as a bundle of normative legal
principles seeking territorial legitimation in a special time and place. The imperial
model of legitimation finally adopted—stressing diversity and multi-ethnicity—
was as plausible as the nation-state model, when viewed from the starting point of
the nineteenth century.⁴ This interpretation stands in contrast to that of Ivan
Berend, who views east Central Europe as marked by backwardness, laggardness, a
crisis zone dominated by peripheral concerns, and manifesting an east Central
European Sonderweg, barely able to achieve parity with Western Europe and
Germany.⁵
The history of the Empire in the later nineteenth and early twentieth centuries
presents a particularly challenging assignment for any historian, since the models
¹ K, 1 (1907–8): 3–4. For the dual meaning of Austria as the traditional (and largely German-
speaking) “Erblande” on the one hand and the whole of the Empire on the other, see the classic account
of R. J. W. Evans, The Making of the Habsburg Monarchy 1550–1700: An Interpretation (Oxford, 1979),
pp. 157–94.
² Focusing on Pieter Judson’s outstanding interpretive history of the Empire, published in 2016, see
Laurence Cole, “Visions and Revisions of Empire: Reflections on a New History of the Habsburg
Monarchy,” AHY, 49 (2018): 261–80.
³ Arno Strohmeyer, “ ‘Österreichische’ Geschichte der Neuzeit als multiperspektivische
Raumgeschichte: ein Versuch,” in Martin Scheutz and Arno Strohmeyer, eds, Was heißt
“österreichische” Geschichte? Probleme, Perspektiven und Räume der Neuzeitforschung (Innsbruck,
2008), p. 185.
⁴ Maciej Janowski, “Justifying Political Power in 19th Century Europe: The Habsburg Monarchy
and Beyond,” in Alexei Miller and Alfred J. Rieber, eds, Imperial Rule (Budapest, 2004), pp. 78–80.
⁵ Ivan T. Berend, The Crisis Zone of Europe: An Interpretation of East-Central European History in
the First Half of the Twentieth Century (Cambridge, 1986), pp. 1–21.
3
⁶ See, for example, Andrea Komlosy, “Imperial Cohesion, Nation-Building, and Regional
Integration in the Habsburg Monarchy, 1804‒1918,” in Stefan Berger and Alexei Miller, eds,
Nationalizing Empires (Budapest, 2015), pp. 369–427; Franz Leander Fillafer, “Imperium oder
Kulturstaat? Die Habsburgermonarchie und die Historisierung der Nationalkulturen im 19.
Jahrhundert,” in Philipp Ther, ed., Kulturpolitik und Theater: Die kontinentalen Imperien in Europa
im Vergleich (Vienna, 2012), pp. 23–53; Bálint Varga, “Writing Imperial History in the Age of High
Nationalism: Imperial Historians on the Fringes of the Habsburg Monarchy,” ERH, 24 (2017): 80–95;
Peter Becker, “Stolpersteine auf dem Weg zum kooperativen Imperium: Bürokratische Praxis,
gesellschaftliche Erwartungen und sozialpolitische Strategien,” in Jana Osterkamp, ed., Kooperatives
Imperium: Politische Zusammenarbeit in der späten Habsburgermonarchie (Göttingen, 2018),
pp. 23–53; Peter Becker, “Der Staat: Eine österreichische Geschichte?,” MIÖG, 126 (2018): 317–40;
Fredrik Lindström, “The State and Bureaucracy as a Key Field of Research in Habsburg Studies,” in
Franz Adlgasser and Fredrik Lindström, eds, The Habsburg Civil Service and Beyond: Bureaucracy and
Civil Servants from the Vormärz to the Inter-War Years (Vienna, 2019), pp. 13–47; and John Deak,
“The Great War and the Forgotten Realm: The Habsburg Monarchy and the First World War,” JMH,
86 (2014): 336–80.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
The rest of the members on both sides submitted to be fined rather than attempt the
knotty subject; but by common consent, the penal rule was dispensed with. Nothing
now remained to close the exercises, but the decision of the Chair.
The President, John Nuble, was a young man, not unlike Craig in his turn of mind;
though he possessed an intellect a little more sprightly than Craig's. His decision was
short.
"Gentlemen," said he, "I do not understand the subject. This," continued he, (pulling
out his knife, and pointing to the silvered or cross side of it,) "is 'Internal Suggestions.'
And this" (pointing to the other, or pile side,) "is 'Bias of Jurisprudence:'" so saying, he
threw up his knife, and upon its fall, determined that 'Internal Suggestions' had got it;
and ordered the decision to be registered accordingly.
It is worthy of note, that in their zeal to accomplish their purpose, Longworth and
McDermot forgot to destroy the lists of subjects, from which they had selected the one
so often mentioned; and one of these lists containing the subject discussed, with a
number more like it, was picked up by Mr. Craig, who made a public exhibition of it,
threatening to arraign the conspirators before the society, for a contempt. But, as the
parting hour was at hand, he overlooked it with the rest of the brotherhood, and often
laughed heartily at the trick.
"The Militia Company Drill," is not by the author of the other pieces
but has a strong family resemblance, and is very well executed.
Among the innumerable descriptions of Militia musters which are so
rife in the land, we have met with nothing at all equal to this in the
matter of broad farce.
"The Turf" is also capital, and bears with it a kind of dry and sarcastic
morality which will recommend it to many readers.
"The Fox-Hunt," "The Wax Works," and "A Sage Conversation," are
all good—but neither as good as many other articles in the book.
"The Shooting Match," which concludes the volume, may rank with
the best of the Tales which precede it. As a portraiture of the
manners of our South-Western peasantry, in especial, it is perhaps
better than any.
Altogether this very humorous, and very clever book forms an æra in
our reading. It has reached us per mail, and without a cover. We will
have it bound forthwith, and give it a niche in our library as a sure
omen of better days for the literature of the South.
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the
United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms
of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying,
performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this
work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes
no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in
any country other than the United States.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of
other ways including checks, online payments and credit card
donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.