Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Reign of Speech full chapter instant download
The Reign of Speech full chapter instant download
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-reign-of-speech-on-applied-
lacanian-psychoanalysis-1st-edition-dries-g-m-dulsster/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-rise-and-reign-of-the-mammals-
steve-brusatte/
https://ebookmass.com/product/ontology-and-phenomenology-of-
speech-an-existential-theory-of-speech-marklen-e-konurbaev/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-reign-of-anti-logos-
performance-in-postmodernity-david-hawkes/
Offensive Speech, Religion, and the Limits of the Law
Nicholas Hatzis
https://ebookmass.com/product/offensive-speech-religion-and-the-
limits-of-the-law-nicholas-hatzis-2/
https://ebookmass.com/product/reign-of-blood-book-17-of-the-grey-
wolves-series-quinn-loftis/
https://ebookmass.com/product/firefighters-secret-flame-reign/
https://ebookmass.com/product/speech-science-primer-physiology-
acoustics-and-perception-of-speech-6th-edition-ebook-pdf/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-handbook-of-language-and-
speech-disorders-2nd-edition-jack-s-damico/
THE PALGRAVE LACAN SERIES
SERIES EDITORS: CALUM NEILL · DEREK HOOK
Series Editors
Calum Neill
Edinburgh Napier University
Edinburgh, UK
Derek Hook
Duquesne University
Pittsburgh, USA
Jacques Lacan is one of the most important and influential thinkers of the
20th century. The reach of this influence continues to grow as we settle
into the 21st century, the resonance of Lacan’s thought arguably only
beginning now to be properly felt, both in terms of its application to
clinical matters and in its application to a range of human activities and
interests. The Palgrave Lacan Series is a book series for the best new
writing in the Lacanian field, giving voice to the leading writers of a new
generation of Lacanian thought. The series will comprise original mono-
graphs and thematic, multi-authored collections. The books in the series
will explore aspects of Lacan’s theory from new perspectives and with
original insights. There will be books focused on particular areas of or
issues in clinical work. There will be books focused on applying Lacanian
theory to areas and issues beyond the clinic, to matters of society, politics,
the arts and culture. Each book, whatever its particular concern, will work
to expand our understanding of Lacan’s theory and its value in the 21st
century.
This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature
Switzerland AG.
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Psychoanalysis is the reign of speech, there’s no other cure.
—Jacques Lacan, 1974
Acknowledgments
This book would not have been possible without the “work-of-many.” As
such, some thanks are in order. First of all, I would like to thank Stijn
Vanheule for taking me on as one of his PhD students. His guidance while
I was writing my dissertation and then transforming it into this book has
proven to be of incredible value. I cannot thank him enough. He provided
me not just with the opportunity to study the theoretical and clinical
aspects of Lacanian psychoanalysis but also, and more importantly for me,
a chance to teach. Taking the floor, elaborating on Lacanian psychoanaly-
sis, having to try to explain myself to students and being questioned by
them, has been extremely formative. There isn’t another way I would have
preferred to spend the last few years. It has truly been an honor.
Additionally, I would like to express my appreciation and gratitude to
Lieven Jonckheere, Lieve Billiet, and Mattias Desmet—the members of
my doctoral guidance committee—for offering advice throughout the
process of writing my dissertation. Thanks are also in order for all those
who provided me with useful feedback on various parts and drafts of this
book. Thanks to my former, current, and future coworkers at the
Department of Psychoanalysis and Clinical Consulting at Ghent University
for all the interesting conversations, those we have had and those to come.
A special thanks to Goedele Hermans, Tom Lintacker, Erik Mertens, and
Kimberly Van Nieuwenhove, who offered to be first readers of my final
manuscript, for their constructive feedback.
My deepest gratitude to my analyst and supervisors for the only kind of
formation that really matters, and thanks to all those who trust me when
they enter my clinical practice. Your influence is present in every word
vii
viii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
written in this book. I would also like to express my appreciation for the
Kring voor Psychoanalyse van de New Lacanian School and its members,
who, through the teachings of Jacques-Alain Miller, offer an orientation in
the Lacanian field. It has never stopped being inspiring. Special thanks to
Joost Demuynck, who, when I had just graduated as a clinical psycholo-
gist, accepted my invitation to start a reading group and took up the posi-
tion of a plus-one. He never stopped making clear that young clinicians
interested in psychoanalysis are worth being heard and that they have
something to say. His engagement and commitment inspired me to keep
on working on Lacanian psychoanalysis on more than one occasion.
I would also like to express my deepest gratitude to all those who were
willing to discuss their therapeutic process with me, and I would also like
to thank their respective analysts. Furthermore, I would also like to thank
those who discussed their process of supervision with me. Without these
people, this book would have been impossible. I cannot thank you
all enough.
A heartfelt thanks to those few I consider to be my friends. You know
who you are.
Thanks to Fauve, for the Apartment Story.
Contents
1 Introduction 1
Works Cited 7
ix
x Contents
5 Lacanian Superaudition 99
Supervision in “the Function and Field of Speech and Language
in Psychoanalysis” 100
Supervision in the Sinthome 105
Supervision and Analysis 121
Works Cited 125
Index139
About the Author
xi
List of Figures
xiii
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
1
For reasons of confidentiality, pseudonyms are used for patients throughout this book.
therapeutic process revolved around this diminutive and the fact that she
saw herself as little, as someone who made herself small and let herself be
abused by others. It struck me how an unintentional intervention could
have had such an effect, and this flipped my therapeutic practice upside
down. It made me wonder about the psychoanalytic process and the way
I intervened or positioned myself as a psychotherapist. As “there is cause
only in something that does not work” (Lacan (1973 [1964], p. 25), I
decided to work on this and started to investigate the concrete processes
through which patients, consulting a Lacanian psychoanalyst, can be
relieved of their symptoms and the role of the psychoanalyst in this process.
When one wants to study the Lacanian psychoanalytic process, one
quickly stumbles on the testimonies of the pass, introduced by Lacan in his
text “Proposition of 9 October 1967 on the Psychoanalyst of the School”
(Lacan, 2001b [1967]). The pass is a procedure in which analysts, having
(presumably) finished their analysis, testify about their own trajectory as
analysants.2 A committee of peers then discusses the testimony of an ana-
lyst and decides whether to grant an analyst the title of Analyst of the
School. The aim of this procedure is to account in a transparent way for
what an analytical cure can bring about. As Lacan writes, “the Analyst of
the School is characterized as being among those who are able to testify to
the crucial problems, at the vital point they have come to, for analysis,
especially in so far as they themselves are working on them or at least
working towards resolving them” (Lacan, 2001b [1967], p. 2). The pass
was Lacan’s way of introducing an instrument for the evaluation and inter-
rogation of the results of a psychoanalysis (Billiet et al., 2007). These tes-
timonies undoubtedly provide a unique insight into what is at stake in a
Lacanian psychoanalysis, and I agree with Dumézil (in Didier-Weill, 2001)
that they offer an extraordinary observatory, from which to survey the
2
The procedure of the pass starts with the decision of an analyst, who has come to the
conclusion that their analysis has ended. The first step in the procedure is to contact the
Secretariat of the Pass. This is a body within a Lacanian school that receives the question and
represents the Other to whom this question is addressed. The analyst speaks with two other
analysts who are appointed by the Secretariat of the Pass. These are the passeurs. These pas-
seurs are analysts who are expected to be at roughly the same stage in their analysis and thus
may be receptive to what the analyst is saying. The analyst tells their story to each passeur
separately, after which both passeurs are expected to convey the testimony to the committee,
or cartel, of the pass. This committee, whose composition varies, works on a case that it did
not hear directly itself, and it must judge whether there is indeed a subjective metamorphosis.
If the testimony is declared admissible, the candidate will then be appointed Analyst of the
School, or Analyste de l’Ecole (AE).
1 INTRODUCTION 3
3
Although some will argue that because of the frequency or duration of the treatment this
cannot be called psychoanalytic, I wholeheartedly disagree. We could discuss the semantics
of psychoanalytic treatment, psychoanalysis, psychoanalytic therapy and so on but not on the
basis of duration and frequency. It is the psychoanalytic act that makes a session psychoana-
lytic. I discuss this in more detail in Chap. 4.
1 INTRODUCTION 5
chose a new professional career. She consulted the analyst for two years,
with a frequency of two sessions per week.
Anna, 40 years old, works in marketing. She talked about a therapy of
16 years, which actually consisted of 3 years of intense therapy and then
several short periods of therapy throughout the following years. She con-
sulted the analyst because of chronic alcohol abuse. Throughout the
course of the therapy, her drinking stopped, but for her what seemed to be
more important was being able to move beyond the drama she had expe-
rienced in relation to her parents. This allowed her to move more freely
in life.
Hans, a 44-year-old IT specialist, completed 10 years of therapy, with a
frequency of two sessions per week. His reason for consulting the psycho-
analyst was the breakdown of a relationship. During the therapy, it became
clear that he had a problematic relationship with a female friend and suf-
fered from procrastination. Eventually his position toward his friend
changed, and he could finally act on what he had been postponing.
Finally, Daniel, a 56-year-old teacher, entered therapy because of
chronic stress that resulted in physical symptoms. He ended the therapy
after seeing the analyst for two years, with a frequency of one session per
week. During the analysis he changed his attitude towards his parents and
his own affective experiences, realizing that his symptoms were linked to
affective distress.
Talking with these ex-analysants about their therapeutic journey, each
of them gave a detailed personal account of the reasons why they started
therapy, what they thought had changed because of the therapy, and how
they made sense of this change. I also asked about the end of the therapy
and how they experienced the interaction with their analyst. Very briefly
summarized, they told me they came to the therapy at a moment of crisis
and that they had found someone who paid close attention to their speech.
Because of this, they experienced a surprising reframing and also began to
consider their speech, and this helped them to see themselves in a new
light. More specifically, it helped them reflect on what they really wanted.
In some previously published papers, I used these interviews to ques-
tion the Lacanian therapeutic process (Dulsster et al., 2019; Dulsster
et al., 2021). In this book, I will use these interviews as a thread to elabo-
rate more on this process through a theoretical perspective and discuss
some aspects not presented in the published papers. What these interviews
demonstrate most of all, I contend, is that the psychoanalytic experience is
the reign of speech and that this cannot be underestimated. All of the
6 D. G. M. DULSSTER
4
Some might have noticed I did not specify any diagnosis concerning the ex-analysants I
interviewed. Although this could be debated, I must state that most of the theory discussed
in this book concerns the matter of the structure of neurosis.
1 INTRODUCTION 7
Works Cited
Billiet, L., Hoornaert, G., Lysy, A., & Vander Vennet, L. (2007). Voorstelling van
het Werkseminarie ‘Lacans School en Passe’. Inwit, 2(3), 268–269.
Bonnaud, H. (2012). Tearing away the real. Hurly-Burly, 8, 93–96.
8 D. G. M. DULSSTER
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside
the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to
the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying,
displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works
based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The
Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright
status of any work in any country other than the United States.
1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form,
including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if
you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project
Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or
other format used in the official version posted on the official
Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at
no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a
means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other
form. Any alternate format must include the full Project
Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.