Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CRWP protection Rani and Pankaj vs State of UT Chandigarh 2024
CRWP protection Rani and Pankaj vs State of UT Chandigarh 2024
and 3 to protect the life and personal liberty of the petitioners and
petitioners.
marriage
Place:- Chandigarh
Date:- 16.05.2024
(Mohit Kakkar)
Advocate
Counsel for the petitioners
P/628/17 NOR : PH 223105
IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF THE PUNJAB AND
HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Writ Petition ______________ of 2024
MEMO OF PARTIES
1. Rani, age about 18 Years, born on 15.03.2005, wife of Pankaj Kumar,
daughter of Sh. Ram Nath, resident of Tubewell No. 10, Kaimbwala, PO
Naya Gaon, UT Chandigarh at present residing at House No. 999, Sector
45, Burail, UT Chandigarh.
(Asadhar Card No. 2749 4703 9029) Phone No.
(Mohit Kakkar)
Advocate
Counsel for the petitioners
P/628/17 NOR : PH 223105
Criminal Writ Petition under Articles 226 of the
RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:
1. That the petitioners are permanent residents of above said address and
being citizens of India they are entitle to invoke extra jurisdiction of this
Hon’ble court and therefore seeking the indulgence of this Hon’ble Court
for directing respondents No. 2 and 3 to protect the life and personal
to interfere with the liberty and lives of petitioners or harass them in any
petitioners.
2. That the petitioners knew each other for the last about 2 years and
having likings for each other and wanted to marry with each other, when
they disclosed about their relations and desire to their respective family
members then they got agitated over the relationship between the
but respondents no. 4 to 9 and other relatives did not agree for the
herein that the petitioners were having no child from their relationship
and Petitioner no. 2 belongs to General Caste and are educated as the
marry her with the boy of their choice and as such petitioners jointly
decided to marry with each other after running away from their homes
Hindu Rights and Rituals at Pracheen Guga Marhi Rama Krishna Mandir,
evidencing the same are annexed as ANNEXURE P-3 & ANNEXURE P-4..
After the solemnization of marriage both the petitioners told about the
same to their respective family members, but they got furious and
have not accepted the marriage of the petitioners but later on the family
member of the petitioner no. 2 got agreed with the marriage of the
petitioners but the family members of petitioner no. 1 most probably
consequences and since then the petitioner are running pillar to post to
save their life but no one adhere their genuine grievance and accordingly
petition.
no. 1 and now they came to know about the factum of marriage and
being apprehended danger to their personal life and liberty are away
from their houses and have also moved representation dated 15.05.2024
6. That the petitioners have not committed any offence in the eyes of law as
they are having marriageable age and are able to know what is right and
wrong. They are innocent, law abiding and peace loving citizens and
7. That the marriage concept as emerging from the times back, it was a
trend in the society to marry the boy and girl according to wishes of their
parents. There used to be no concern about the likes and dislikes of the
boy and girl. Though in our modern times, with the growing of
girl and boy, but still the approach of the society is constrained to marry
within their choice and any alteration to this is still not acceptable to the
horizons have expanded, but when we talk of the marriage, still the
narrow mindedness rules the mind. It seems that though the society or
people how much educated that are still find themselves to be bounded
boy and girl and many other factors, which otherwise have nothing to do
have to face stiff opposition from all the sections of the society and their
9. That both the petitioners were unmarried at the time of their marriage
10. That Article 21 of the Constitution of India envisages that no person shall
11. That the main questions of law arises for the kind consideration of this
the life & personal liberty of the petitioners who are having
Constitution of India?
12. That the petitioners in the facts and circumstances of the present case
are not left with any other alternative remedy of appeal or revision
except to approach this Hon’ble Court by way of filing the present writ
India.
the case be called for and after perusing the same this Hon’ble Court may
be pleased to:-
out hereunder;
OR
manner;
(c) Issue any other appropriate writ, order or direction as this
Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and
dispensed with;
notices;
Place:- Chandigarh
Date:- 16.05.2024
(Mohit Kakkar)
Advocate
Counsel for the petitioners
P/628/17 NOR : PH 223105
IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF THE PUNJAB
AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Writ Petition ______________ of 2024
Rani and another ...Petitioners
Versus
State of UT, Chandigarh and others ...Respondents
Affidavit of Rani, age about 18 Years, born on 15.03.2005, wife of
Pankaj Kumar, daughter of Sh. Ram Nath, resident of Tubewell No. 10,
Kaimbwala, PO Naya Gaon, UT Chandigarh at present residing at residing
at House No. 999, Sector 45, Burail, UT Chandigarh.
(Aadhar Card No. 2749 4703 9029) Phone No.
I the above named deponent do hereby solemnly affirm and
declare as under:
1. That the statement of facts made in the para of accompanying
petition are true and correct to my knowledge and as per the
documents placed on record.
2. That the deponent and is fully conversant with the facts the
accompanying petition is prepared by the counsel under the
instructions of the deponent and no such or similar petition has
earlier been filed by the petitioners either in this Hon’ble Court or
in the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India or before Ld.
Sessions/District Courts.
3. That the deponent has annexed his Aadhar card with the petition
and the details mentioned in memo of parties i.e. Aadhar card
number and mobile number is true and correct.
Place:- CHANDIGARH
DATED: DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
Verified that the contents of para No. 1 to 3 of my above said
affidavit are true and correct to my knowledge and belief and
same has been explained to deponent in Simple Punjabi. Nothing
material has been concealed therein.
Place:- CHANDIGARH
DATED: DEPONENT
IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF THE PUNJAB
AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Writ Petition ______________ of 2024
Rani and another ...Petitioners
Versus
State of UT, Chandigarh and others ...Respondents
Affidavit of Pankaj Kumar, age about 24 Years, born on 01.01.2000, son
of Sh. Hemaraj, resident of Village Rukunpur, Post Surhurpur, Ambedkar
Nagar, Uttar Pradesh at present residing at House No. 999, Sector 45,
Burail, UT Chandigarh..
(Aadhar Card No. 5451 7686 1691) Phone No.
I the above named deponent do hereby solemnly affirm and
declare as under:
2. That the deponent and is fully conversant with the facts the
accompanying petition is prepared by the counsel under the
instructions of the deponent and no such or similar petition has
earlier been filed by the petitioners either in this Hon’ble Court or
in the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India or before Ld.
Sessions/District Courts.
3. That the deponent has annexed his Aadhar card with the petition
Place:- CHANDIGARH
DATED: DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
Verified that the contents of para No. 1 to 3 of my above said
affidavit are true and correct to my knowledge and belief and
same has been explained to deponent in Simple Punjabi. Nothing
material has been concealed therein.
Place:- CHANDIGARH
DATED: DEPONENT
ANNEXURE P-2
Photograph Rani
DOB: 15.03.2005
Female
Bar Code
ADVOCATE
ANNEXURE P-3
Pankaj Kumar
DOB : 01.01.2000
Male
My Aadhar My Identity
Chandigarh, 160047
ADVOCATE
ANNEXURE P-4
Marriage Certificate
CHANDIGARH
ADVOCATE
ANNEXURE P-4
True copy
Advocate
To
Senior Superintendent of Police, Chandigarh
Police Post Burail Sector 45
Subject: Application for protection of life and liberty of the
UT Chandigarh, India
Sir,
2. That the applicant is major and well known to the right and
persons.
each other and were liking each other from last 1 years. The
per their wishes, but the above said persons did not agreed
with the same because the above said persons want to marry
applicant Rani with the boy of their choice and accordingly the
solemnized marriage.
4. That after getting the information about the solemnization of
that they will kill them and the applicants want to reside at
Sd/-
(i) Rani D/o Ram Nath
(ii) Pankaj Kumar son of Sh.
Hemaraj,
Both residents of House No. 999,
Sector 45, Burail, UT Chandigarh.
IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF THE PUNJAB
AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Place:- Chandigarh
Date:- 16.05.2024
(Mohit Kakkar)
Advocate
Counsel for the petitioners
P/628/17 NOR : PH 223105
IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF THE PUNJAB
AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Versus
Court Fees
______________________________________________ _____
______________________________________________ _____
Place:- Chandigarh
Date:- 16.05.2024
(Mohit Kakkar)
Advocate
Counsel for the petitioners
P/628/17 NOR : PH 223105
IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF THE PUNJAB
To
Chandigarh.
Versus
Sir,
Yours faithfully
Place:- Chandigarh
Date:- 16.05.2024
(Mohit Kakkar)
Advocate
Counsel for the petitioners
P/628/17 NOR : PH 223105