Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full download Ferruccio Busoni as Architect of Sound Erinn E. Knyt file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download Ferruccio Busoni as Architect of Sound Erinn E. Knyt file pdf all chapter on 2024
Erinn E. Knyt
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmass.com/product/ferruccio-busoni-as-architect-of-sound-erinn-e-knyt/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
https://ebookmass.com/product/sound-and-reason-synesthesia-as-
metacognition-sven-hroar-klempe/
https://ebookmass.com/product/articulation-and-phonological-
disorders-speech-sound-disorders-in-children-8th-edition-john-e-
bernthal/
https://ebookmass.com/product/aws-certified-solutions-architect-
official-study-guide-associate-exam-aws-certified-solutions-
architect-official-associate-exam/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-fallen-architect-1st-edition-
charles-belfoure/
Hollywood Harmony: Musical Wonder and the Sound of
Cinema Frank Lehman
https://ebookmass.com/product/hollywood-harmony-musical-wonder-
and-the-sound-of-cinema-frank-lehman/
https://ebookmass.com/product/place-management-and-crime-
ownership-and-property-rights-as-a-source-of-social-control-john-
e-eck/
https://ebookmass.com/product/speech-sound-disorders-first-
edition-ebook-pdf-version/
https://ebookmass.com/product/menergy-san-franciscos-gay-disco-
sound-louis-niebur/
https://ebookmass.com/product/where-sight-meets-sound-the-
poetics-of-late-medieval-music-writing-emily-zazulia/
Ferruccio Busoni as Architect of Sound
Ferruccio Busoni
as Architect of Sound
ERINN E. KNYT
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers
the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education
by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University
Press in the UK and certain other countries.
The publisher gratefully acknowledges assistance from the General Fund of the American Musicological Society,
supported in part by the National Endowment for the Humanities and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197625491.001.0001
1 3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2
Printed by Integrated Books International, United States of America
For My Father
Contents
Figures
1.1. Busoni, sketch of a cathedral on the envelope from a letter by Max Reger of
September 6, 1895, to Busoni 21
1.2. Busoni, list of architecture books in Busoni’s Zurich book collection 23
1.3. Busoni, diagram related to the formal structure of the Fugue in C Major
from J. S. Bach’s Well-Tempered Clavier, book I 47
1.4. Photo of Ferruccio Busoni with Frederick August Stock, Wilhelm
Middelschulte, and Georg Hütter, 1911 56
1.5. Photo of Henry van de Velde’s Bloemenwerf House, c. 1895 67
1.6. Program from the Weimar Bauhaus Week, August 18, 1923 73
2.1. Van de Velde’s Weimar-Haus Hohe Pappeln. View from the south.
Bildarchiv Foto Marburg. Photographer unknown. Photograph from
c. 1915 to 1917 94
2.2. Image of the Victoria-Luis-Platz on a postcard from 1908 95
2.3. Busoni, sketchbook, plans for the Piano Concerto in C Major, BV 247,
indicating borrowings from Sigune, BV 231 100
2.4. Busoni’s drawing depicting the structure of the Piano Concerto, enhanced
by Heinrich Vogeler 101
2.5. Busoni, diagram of the formal structure of Busoni’s Grosse Fuge:
Kontrapunktische Fantasie über Joh. Seb. Bach’s letztes unvollendetes
Werk für Klavier ausgeführt 110
2.6. Busoni, drawing illustrating the form of the two-piano version of the
Fantasia contrappuntistica 111
2.7. Image of the Papal Palace at Avignon. Photograph in the Public Domain 112
2.8. Schlemmer’s ambulant architecture drawing in “Mensch und
Kunstfigur” 116
2.9. Busoni, sketch of Arlecchino 119
2.10. Georg Muche, architect, Haus am Horn, from the 1923 Bauhaus
Exhibition, Bauhaus-Archiv Berlin 136
3.1. Busoni, letter of January 7, 1920, to Gerda Busoni and Otto Amsler 165
x List of Figures, Examples, and Tables
3.2. Image of the Münster Cathedral Westwerk with Late Gothic portal from
c. 1900 175
3.3. Busoni’s diagram of the visible and invisible stage (in the unpublished
version) that he hoped music would encompass (Prospektus-Linie Bühne) 181
3.4. Busoni, pencil sketch to illustrate his plan for the staging of Bach’s
St. Matthew Passion 186
3.5. Busoni’s proposed and rejected visions for the spatial theater of the future 188
3.6. Busoni, sketch for a theatrical space with a triple opening. From “Projekt
für eine Dreifache Bühnenöffnung” (Zurich, 1918) 190
4.1. Photograph of the Boston Music Hall from c. 1900 197
4.2. Image of the Zurich Tonhalle from c. 1905 199
4.3. Busoni’s diagram illustrating the form of J. S. Bach’s Little Prelude in
C Minor, BWV 999 212
4.4. Busoni, concert program, January 24, 1907 216
4.5. Busoni’s modification of the solo piano part of Mozart’s Piano Concerto
in G Major, K. 453 219
5.1. Henrik Neugeboren (Henri Nouveau), proposal for a Bach monument
based on mm. 52–55 of the E-flat Minor Fugue of J.S. Bach,
designed in 1928 229
5.2. Vogel, arrangement of Ludwig van Beethoven’s Grosse Fuge for Two Pianos 234
5.3. Program for the composition recital by Busoni’s composition master class
pupils on December 7, 1922 239
5.4. Vogel, Komposition für ein und zwei Klaviere, p. 1 241
5.5. Vogel, Sonata für ein und zwei Klaviere, p. 7 244
5.6. Photograph of Ferruccio Busoni in his apartment at Viktoria-Luise-Platz
with some of his Berlin master class pupils (Kurt Weill, Walther Geiser,
Luc Balmer, and Wladimir Vogel), c. 1923 252
5.7. Weill, Sonata for Cello and Piano (1920), mvmt. 1, p. 1 256
5.8. Varèse’s pyramid diagram from Berlin, 1910 277
5.9. Varèse, sketch for the end of Poème électronique 284
Examples
Tables
This book would not have been written without support from numerous
scholars, colleagues, friends, and family members. I appreciate advice
from colleagues at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, including
Evan MacCarthy, Ernest May, Marianna Ritchey, Emiliano Ricciardi, Jason
Hooper, Brent Auerbach, Gary Karpinski, Chris White, and Salvatore
Macchia, some of whom listened to presentations or read chapter drafts. I am
also thankful for encouragement from George Barth, Karol Berger, Anna
Maria Busse Berger, Sandra Graham, Tom Grey, Heather Hadlock, Stephen
Hinton, and Christopher Reynolds. I am particularly indebted to my editor,
Norman Hirschy, for his advice and counsel, and to my anonymous readers
for their valuable suggestions. This project would not have been as complete
without assistance locating obscure letters, documents, and scores from
people at the following institutions: Archives et Musée de la Littérature (Kosta
Siskakis), Archivio storico comunale (Paola Furlan), Bauhaus-Archiv (Erika
Babatz), Bildarchiv Foto Marburg (Annette Otterbach), Fotoatelier Louis
Held (Stefan Renno), Klassik Stiftung Weimar (Christiana Herrgott, Evelyn
Liepsch, and Sabine Walter), Kurt Weill Foundation (Dave Stein), Library
of Congress (Paul Allen Sommerfeld), Mills College (Janice Braun), Paul
Sacher Stiftung (Felix Meyer, Michèle Noirjean, and Heidy Zimmermann),
San Francisco Conservatory of Music (Jeong Lee), Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin
(Jean-Christophe Gero and Marina Gordienko), Stanford University (Leif
Anderson, Ray Heigemeir, Jerry McBride, Tim Edward Noakes, and Larry
Scott), The Rudolph Ganz Papers (Lisa Schoblasky), University of California
at Berkeley (Dean Smith), University of Massachusetts Amherst (Erin
Jerome and Anne Moore), Yale University Library (Jake Fewx and Jonathan
Manton), and Zentralbibliothek Zürich (Heinrich Aerni). I am also grateful
to the following people for sharing their memories about Egon Petri: Lois
Brandwynne (University of California at Davis), Ken Bruckmeier, Daniell
Revenaugh (d. 2021), and my former piano teacher, Julian White (d. 2006),
who studied with Petri and spoke of him often during lessons. Special thanks
are also due Benjamin Ayotte for his typesetting of the examples, to Timothy
xiv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
DeWerff for his copyediting, and to Colleen Wetzel for her assistance in
procuring sources.
This book would not have been possible without the generous support of
a Faculty Research Grant from the University of Massachusetts Amherst.
I would also like to thank my parents and parents-in-law for their support
while traveling to archives. The unexpected loss of my father in December
2021 deserves special mention, and I am dedicating this book to him. Finally,
I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my husband Eric, and to my
children, for their patience as I worked on book drafts and went on numerous
trips to archives and libraries.
Introduction
Ferruccio Busoni and Architecture
I wanted to become an architect, but how was it possible? The course was
already fixed by the continuous directions, teachings, commitments, and
models offered by my father—a clarinetist—and my mother—teacher of
piano!2
1 [Die Felsensäulen fangen an tief und leise zu ertönen.] Adam Oehlenschläger, Aladdin oder die
Wunderlampe: Ein dramatisches Gedicht in zwei Spielen (Amsterdam: Kunst und Industrie, 1808),
560. Quoted in Busoni, Piano Concerto, BV 247 (Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel, 1906), 294.
2 [Mein Wunsch ging dahin, Architekt zu werden. Aber wie sollte das kommen. War doch der
Weg festgestellt durch die steten Unterweisungen, Lehren, Bemühungen und Vorbilder, die mir der
Vater—Clarinettist—und die Mutter—Klavierlehrerin—ständig lieferten! So waren ja die Gleise
gelegt und befestigt, und mein Schicksalsrad rollt sicher und unverrückbar in dieser Richtung.]
Busoni, quoted in Gottfried Galston, diary entry of March 29, 1924, Kalendernotizen über Ferruccio
Busoni, Taschenbücher zur Musikwissenschaft 144 (Wilhelmshaven: Florian Noetzel, 2000), 30.
Busoni elaborated about his desire to become an architect in a memoir recorded by his friend, the
architect Henry van de Velde. Van de Velde remembers that Busoni particularly disliked being
promoted as a child prodigy—and it was in those instances that he most strongly hoped to switch
to the field of architecture: “Busoni explained that when he felt an insurmountable reluctance to be
shown to the public and the European Court as a child prodigy, such a passion for architecture arose
in him, that he was ready to renounce music and to devote himself to architecture.” [Im Anschluss an
eine diskrete Bemerkung seiner Frau erklärte Busoni, dass als ihn eine unüberwindliche abneigung
ergriff, dem Publikum und den europäischen Höfen als Wunderkind vorgeführt zu werden, eine
solche Leidenschaft für die Architektur in ihm erwachte, dass er bereit war, auf die Musik zu
verzichten, um sich der Architektur zu widmen.] Henry van de Velde, Geschichte meines Lebens, ed.
Hans Curjel (Munich: R. Piper and Co., 1962), 392–99/503.
Ferruccio Busoni as Architect of Sound. Erinn E. Knyt, Oxford University Press. © Oxford University Press 2023.
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197625491.003.0001
2 Introduction
3 Busoni, Sketch of a New Aesthetic of Music, trans. Th. Baker (New York: G. Schirmer, 1911), 4.
Introduction 3
is transparent. It is sonorous air.”4 While the other art forms took up phys-
ical space, and according to Busoni, imitated nature mimetically, music was
more abstract and could travel freely: “Even the poetic word ranks lower in
point of incorporealness. It [music] can gather together and disperse, can be
motionless repose or wildest tempestuosity; it has the extremest heights per-
ceptible to man—what other art has these?”5 That said, these waves could be
translated into physical symbols that take up space on paper (if imperfectly),
according to Busoni, and they emanate from physical beings and objects
when they are conceived, delivered, and received.
Thinking about sound and the space it occupies expanded Busoni’s ideas
about music organization, about tones and timbres, and about the spatial
placement of sounds. And while some of his abstract notions of music and
space transcended any physical boundaries, as he cried that music is “free
(‘frei’),” some of his ideas about spatialized Tonkunst were more tangibly
realized in relation to architecture.6 Busoni’s creative activities were informed
by the study of buildings and floor plans as well as by the ideas of contemporary
architects, such as Henry van de Velde and members of the Weimar Bauhaus.
His approach to form resembles Jugendstil art and architecture in the 1910s
and Bauhaus art, theater, and architecture in the 1920s. He drew architectural
diagrams to describe his structural conception for pieces and the space they
occupied. These diagrams represent a departure from linear notions of form
as possessing a beginning, middle, and end. In some of his operas, architec-
ture determined spatial aspects of the music and staging. In his arrangements,
he imposed his own ideas about architectural shape on compositions of others
to create unique structures. He also enlarged textures in the compositions of
others to fill the large new concert halls in which he performed.
Even despite the importance of architecture for Busoni’s work, scholars
have only touched upon the topic lightly.7 Through close readings of his
4 Busoni, Sketch of a New Aesthetic of Music, 4. [Das Kind—es schwebt! Es berührt nicht die Erde
mit seinen Füssen. Es ist nicht der Schwere unterworfen. Es ist fast unkörperlich. Seine Materie ist
durchsichtig. Es ist tönende Luft. Es ist fast die Natur selbst. Es ist frei.] Busoni, Entwurf einer neuen
Ästhetik der Tonkunst (Wilhelmshaven: Florian Noetzel, 2001), 12.
5 Busoni, Sketch of a New Aesthetic of Music, 5. [Selbst das dichterische Wort steht ihr an
Unkörperlichkeit nach; sie kann sich zusammenballen und kann auseinanderfliessen, die regloteste
Ruhe und das lebhafteste Stürmen sein; sie hat die höchsten höhen, die Menschen wahrnehmbar
sind—welche andere Kunst hat das?] Busoni, Entwurf, 13.
6 Busoni, Sketch of a New Aesthetic of Music, 4.
7 Antony Beaumont, for instance, has written about the connection between Busoni’s architectural
sketches and the Piano Concerto, BV 247. Beaumont, Busoni the Composer (Bloomington: Indiana
University Press, 1985).
4 Introduction
writings, music, and recordings, this book provides the first comprehen-
sive view of how architecture informed his composition and performance
approaches. In the process, the book reveals continuity among his activities
as composer, arranger, performer, and thinker. At the same time, it reveals
connections between music and architecture.
This book also addresses Busoni’s historiographic significance as a com-
poser. Uncertainty about how to situate Busoni historically has led to ne-
glect of his music in general. As Carl Dahlhaus has observed, he, along with
one of his mentees, Jean Sibelius, does not fit easily in any historiographic
categories. He cannot be clearly considered as either a progressive or a tra-
ditionalist: “Composers as Jean Sibelius and Ferruccio Busoni, undoubtedly
belonged to the modernists—as they were understood at that time, but were
afraid to take the final step towards new music; for critics unable to make
an aesthetic judgment without first ascertaining their historical significance,
they ended up in an aesthetic ‘no-man’s land’ by failing to conform to histori-
ographical formulae.”8
Part of the confusion about Busoni’s historiographic significance can be
attributed to the fact that he never broke with earlier musical traditions even
as he wrote about and explored experimental ideas. That makes it difficult to
understand his works in relation to much of the discourse about modernism
in music.9 Many of Busoni’s contemporaries were also critical of the com-
poser for his Janus-faced interest in and reliance on historical styles and to-
nality and his seeming failure to implement all of his radical aesthetic ideals.
Arnold Schoenberg, for instance, was surprised by Busoni’s compositions,
expecting a more direct break with past musical traditions based on his novel
ideas about the future of music. On September 4, 1910, Schoenberg wrote to
Busoni, requesting to see some pieces that more fully implemented his vision
for new music: “And now something which I have long been meaning to ask
8 [Komponisten wie Jean Sibelius und Ferruccio Busoni, die zweifellos der Moderne— wie
man sie damals verstand—angehörten, sich jedoch scheuten, den Schritt zur Neuen Musik zu
vollziehen, gerieten für eine Kritik, die kaum noch ästhetisch zu urteilen vermochte, ohne sich
des geschichtlichen “Stellenwerts” einer Erscheinung zu vergewissern, dadurch in ästhetisches
Niemandsland, dass sie sich den historiographischen Formeln entzogen.] Carl Dahlhaus, Die
Musik des 19. Jahrhunderts: Mit 75 Notenbeispielen, 91 Abbildungen und 2 Farbtafeln, Akademische
Verlagsgesellschaft Athenaion (Wiesbaden: Laaber Verlag, 1980), 309.
9 Michael Levenson, for instance, has described modernism as involving new treatments of the
tonal language and instruments, disunities, and experimentation, These were topics Busoni was in-
terested in, wrote about, and practiced. Yet, these notions described by Levenson were often associ-
ated with historical rupture and a break with past traditions, such as tonality, which Busoni never
wanted to do. Michael Levenson, “Introduction,” in The Cambridge Companion to Modernism, ed.
Michael Levenson (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 3.
Introduction 5
you. I would like to know some other works of yours. Those which actually
put into practice what you have promised in your pamphlet [Sketch of a New
Aesthetic of Music].”10 At the same time, Daniel Grimley has contended that,
in spite of the fact that Busoni promoted the music of Carl Nielsen in Berlin,
Nielsen “always seems to have had more respect for Busoni as a pianist than
as a conductor or composer.”11 Even Sibelius considered many of Busoni’s
compositions more traditional than his own works.12
In addition, while recent scholars have recognized the importance
of Busoni’s ideas, they have not always given the same weight or atten-
tion to finding congruence between his compositions and his ideas. John
Williamson, for instance, has written a compelling article about the unique-
ness of Busoni’s vision of the musical work, but his writings focus predom-
inantly on Busoni’s aesthetic writings, as opposed to his compositions.13
Martina Weindel has similarly written a very thorough text that focuses pri-
marily on Busoni’s aesthetics.14 While comprehensive studies of Busoni’s
compositions by Antony Beaumont and Larry Sitsky have done much to
spread knowledge about his compositional output, they have primarily fo-
cused on the valuable activities of cataloguing, documenting, and analyzing
his most important compositions, rather than in showing continuity be-
tween Busoni’s visionary ideas and his compositional practice.15 More recent
studies have focused on issues of continuity between his ideas and musical
practice, such as Paul Fleet’s study on phenomenology in the music and
10 Arnold Schoenberg, letter of September 4, 1910, in Ferruccio Busoni: Selected Letters, ed. Antony
2010), 192. Grimley supports his statement with a quote from a diary entry of 1891. He does not
provide additional assessments of Busoni from Busoni’s maturity. Nielsen dedicated his Symphony
no. 2 “The Four Temperaments,” op. 16, to Busoni. Busoni was instrumental in having the piece
performed in Berlin on November 5, 1903, by the Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra (with Nielsen
conducting).
12 Jean Sibelius, entry of June 13, 1912, in Dagbok: 1909–1944, ed. Fabian Dahlström, Skrifter
Ferruccio Busoni,” in The Musical Work: Reality or Invention?, Liverpool Music Symposium, ed.
Michael Talbot (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2000), 187–204.
14 Martina Weindel, Ferruccio Busonis Ästhetik in seinen Briefen und Schriften, ed. Richard Schaal
(Wilhelmshaven: Heinrichsofen-Bücher, 1996). Albrecht Riethmüller has also explored Busoni’s aes-
thetics, but primarily in relation to specific music examples. While primarily exploring the ambig-
uous boundaries between transcription, arrangement, and compositions, as well as Busoni’s theories
of Junge Klassizität, Riethmüller does not emphasize Busoni’s experimentation with the more exper-
imental aspects covered in this book. Albrecht Riethmüller, Ferruccio Busonis Poetik, Neue Studien
zur Musikwissenschaft 4 (Mainz: Schott, 1988).
15 Beaumont, Busoni the Composer; Larry Sitsky, Busoni and the Piano: The Works, the Writings,
and the Recordings, Distinguished Reprints 3, 2nd ed. (Hillsdale, NY: Pendragon Press, 2009).
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
provinces. It is not quite easy to forecast where the centre of gravity
of the Central Province will ultimately fall, but if, as is possible, the
Bauchi highlands become in time a second Simla for the Central
Executive, the headquarters of the Central Province would
presumably be fixed at Zungeru, the present capital of the Northern
Protectorate. III. The Western Province, comprising all that is now
incorporated in the existing western province of Southern Nigeria,
plus—to the north—Kabba, Ilorin and Borgu, while the right bank of
the Forcados and Niger would form the eastern boundary, the
boundaries of the Province following natural lines. Its headquarters
would be Oshogbo, or its immediate neighbourhood. IV. The Eastern
Province, comprising what is now the eastern province of South
Nigeria, but with its western frontier coterminous with the left bank of
the Niger and Forcados and its northern frontiers pushed up to the
south bank of the Benue, embracing Bassa and part of Muri, Yola,
however, being left, for political reasons, in the Central Province, as
noted above. Its headquarters would be Old Calabar, the starting-
point of the future eastern railway (see map).
Each of these great provinces would be ruled by a Lieutenant-
Governor, with Residents and Assistant Residents under him, and,
wherever possible, the present political boundaries of what are now
provinces, but would become known as districts and sub-districts,
would be retained. Thus in the Northern or Sudan Province nothing
would be changed in this respect, save the separation of
Mohammedan Zaria from pagan Zaria; nothing would be changed in
the Central Province, so far as the units remaining within it were
concerned, except the division of Muri, which would offer no political
embarrassments. The enlargement of the Eastern Province as
proposed, would in some respects facilitate the work of
administration and would not cut across any ethnic divisions. In the
Western Province the principal alteration would be the re-grouping of
the different Yoruba sections in their old state form (vide Part II.)
under a Resident who would reside at Oyo; Ilorin, Kabba, and Borgu
would remain under Residents as at present. Warri (the capital of the
existing central province of Southern Nigeria) would become the seat
of a Residency for the Bini, Sobo, Ijaw and Jekri speaking peoples.
Lagos town would continue to be what the expenditure of much
money, and the enterprise of the Yorubas, have made it, the
commercial emporium of at least the western portion of the
Protectorate, and the headquarters of the small surrounding area
known as the “Colony” (vide Part II.), administered by a “Lagos
Council,” which would replace the present “Lagos Legislative
Council,” and be composed of much the same elements as the latter
now consists of, presided over by a Resident. The functions of the
Lagos Council would be confined to the Colony.
The headquarters of the Governor-General and the central seat of
Government would be the high plateau immediately behind Lokoja,
known as Mount Patte, situated in the very centre of the
Protectorate, commanding the Niger and the Benue, within easy
steam of Baro the starting-point of the central railway, and linked up
with the western railway by a branch line to Oshogbo as indicated on
the map. The Governor-General would be assisted by an Executive
and Legislative Council. Of the former the Lieutenant-Governors and
Senior Residents would be ex officio members, together with the
Chief Justice, the Colonial Secretary, the Financial Secretary, and
the officer commanding the troops. The official members of the
Legislative Council would include the Directors of rail and river
transport, of public works, of agriculture, of forestry and of
commercial intelligence; the Director of mining; and the Principal
Medical Officer. The unofficial members would include selected
representatives of the educated native community, and, later on, one
or two distinguished Mallams, and selected representatives of the
European commercial and mining communities.
Possibly, in course of time, the work of the Council could be
carried out in conjunction with periodical Durbars attended by all the
important Emirs, but in no case would the functions of the Council be
allowed to conflict with the Native Administrations of the
Mohammedan Provinces.
SKETCH MAP OF NIGERIA, SHOWING SUGGESTED REARRANGEMENT OF
PROVINCES.
1906 2,695,923
1907 4,089,530
1908 2,237,370
1909 4,929,646
1910 2,399,857