Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full download Globalization: a Very Short Introduction 6th Edition Manfred B. Steger file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download Globalization: a Very Short Introduction 6th Edition Manfred B. Steger file pdf all chapter on 2024
https://ebookmass.com/product/globalization-a-very-short-
introduction-very-introductions-4th-edition/
https://ebookmass.com/product/bacteria-a-very-short-
introduction-2nd-edition-sebastian-g-b-amyes/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-spartans-a-very-short-
introduction-andrew-j-bayliss/
https://ebookmass.com/product/democracy-a-very-short-
introduction-very-short-introductions-2023rd-edition-zack/
Nanotechnology: A Very Short Introduction Philip
Moriarty
https://ebookmass.com/product/nanotechnology-a-very-short-
introduction-philip-moriarty/
https://ebookmass.com/product/genes-a-very-short-
introduction-2nd-edition-jonathan-slack/
https://ebookmass.com/product/poststructuralism-a-very-short-
introduction-2nd-edition-catherine-belsey-2/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-spartans-a-very-short-
introduction-andrew-j-bayliss-2/
https://ebookmass.com/product/american-immigration-a-very-short-
introduction-very-short-introductions-1st-edition-ebook-pdf/
Globalization: A Very Short Introduction
VERY SHORT INTRODUCTIONS are for anyone wanting a stimulating
and accessible way into a new subject. They are written by experts, and
have been translated into more than 45 different languages.
The series began in 1995, and now covers a wide variety of topics in
every d
iscipline. The VSI library currently contains over 700 volumes—a
Very Short Introduction to everything from Psychology and Philosophy of
Science to American History and Relativity—and continues to grow in
every subject area.
Available soon:
IMAGINATION THE VICTORIANS
Jennifer Gosetti-Ferencei Martin Hewitt
GLOBALIZATION
A Very Short Introduction
sixth edition
Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP,
United Kingdom
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship,
and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of
Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries
© Manfred B. Steger 2023
The moral rights of the author have been asserted
First edition published 2003
Second edition published 2009
Third edition published 2013
Fourth edition published 2017
Fifth edition published 2020
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in
a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the
prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted
by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics
rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the
above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the
address above
You must not circulate this work in any other form
and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer
Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press
198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Data available
Library of Congress Control Number: 2022951456
ISBN 978–0–19–288619–4
Printed and bound by
CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY
Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and
for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials
contained in any third party website referenced in this work.
In memory of Roland Robertson (1938–2022),
Model scholar, colleague, friend
Contents
1 What is globalization? 1
2 Globalization in history 12
Index 145
Preface to the sixth edition
69 : 10. See T. Rice Holmes, 2, pp. 185–199. The same thing may
have happened in Britain at Cæsar’s conquest, and still more in the
Saxon conquest.
70 : 4 seq. See p. 206 : 13 and note.
70 : 12–71: 6. These paragraphs elicited a very interesting letter
from a British officer in Howrah, Bengal, India, in October, 1919. He
says: “May I offer one or two remarks on points of detail? On p. 70 it
is stated ‘The Hindu to-day speaks a very ancient form of Aryan
language but there remains not one recognizable trace of the blood of
the white conquerors who poured in through the passes of the
Northwest,’ and again at p. 261, ‘Of all the wonderful conquests of
the Sacæ there remain as evidence of their invasions only these
Indian and Afghan languages. Dim traces of their blood, as stated
before, have been found in the Pamirs and in Afghanistan, but in the
South their blond traits have vanished, even from the Punjab. It may
be that the stature of some of the Afghan hill tribes and of the Sikhs,
and some of the facial characters of the latter, are derived from this
source, but all blondness of skin, hair and eye of the original Sacæ
have utterly vanished.’
“This hardly agrees with my own observations during two years’
service in the Punjab and Northwest Frontier Province. I should say
that among the Pathans living in British territory about Peshawar,
blond traits,—fair skin, the color of old ivory, red or brown hair, grey,
green, or blue eyes,—are as common as really black hair is in
Scotland; while among Panjabi Mussulmans living about Jhelum
these traits are, if not common, at least not extremely rare. Judging
from the experience of one squadron of cavalry, I should put the
proportion of men with blond traits at not less than one per cent. The
women, whom one does not see, must be fairer than the men, as
elsewhere. I have seen a small Panjabi Mahommedan girl, from
about Dera Ismail Khan with yellow hair. I have also seen a Sikh
with red hair, but that was certainly exceptional.
“These remarks are based on what I have seen myself, though no
statistics are kept and it is possible that I am generalizing from
insufficient data. It would not, however, I think, be too much to say
that ‘Blond traits are not uncommon in Afghanistan, and are even to
be found among Mussulmans in the Northwestern Panjab.’ (Afghans
and Indian Mussulmans of course sometimes dye their beards red,
but this artificial blondness has not been confused with the real
thing.)”
The following quotation is from The Outlook for March 10, 1920,
which contains an article entitled “The Present Situation in India,”
by Major-General Thomas D. Pilcher, of the British Army.
“Beside these castes there are tribes, and the Brahmin from the
Punjab has very little indeed in common with the Brahmin from
Bengal or Madras. Many Pathans and Punjabi Mohammedans have
blue eyes and are no darker than a southern European, whereas
some of the depressed tribes are as black as Negroes. Many of the
northern peoples are at least as tall as men of our own race, whereas
other tribes do not average five feet.”
70 : 16. Castes. Deniker, 2, p. 403: “About 2,000 castes may be
enumerated at the present day, but year by year new ones are being
called into existence as a certain number disappear.” In his footnote
Deniker says: “The so-called primitive division into four castes:
Brahmans (priests), Kshatriya (soldiers), Vaisyas (husbandmen and
merchants), and Sudra (common people, outcasts, subject peoples?),
mentioned in the later texts of the Vedas, is rather an indication of
the division into three principal classes of the ruling race as opposed,
in a homogeneous whole, to the conquered aboriginal race (fourth
caste).” He continues: “The essential characteristics of all castes,
persisting amid every change of form, are endogamy within
themselves and the regulation forbidding them to come into contact
one with another and partake of food together.”
See also Zaborowski, Les peuples aryens, p. 65. There is, of course,
an enormous number of books which deal with the caste system of
India.
71 : 7. Sir G. Archdall Reid, 2, p. 186: “If history teaches any lesson
with clearness, it is this, that conquest, to be permanent, must be
accompanied with extermination; otherwise, in the fulness of time,
the natives expel or absorb the conquerors. The Saxon conquest of
England was permanent; of the Norman conquest there remains
scarcely a trace.”
71 : 24. See pp. 217–222 and notes.
72 : 4. See the notes to p. 141 : 4 seq.
72 : 19. Ripley, pp. 219–220, says: “The race question in Germany
came to the front some years ago under rather peculiar
circumstances. Shortly after the Franco-Prussian War, De
Quatrefages promulgated the theory ... that the dominant people in
Germany were not Teutons at all, but were directly descended from
the Finns. Being nothing but Finns, they were to be classed with the
Lapps and other peoples of western Russia.... Coming at a time of
profound national humiliation in France ... the book created a
profound sensation.... A champion of the Germans was not hard to
find. Professor Virchow of Berlin set himself to work to disprove the
theory which thus damned the dominant people of the empire. The
controversy, half political and half scientific, waxed hot at times....
One great benefit flowed indirectly from it all, however. The German
government was induced to authorize the official census of the color
of hair and eyes of the six million school children of the empire.... It
established beyond question the differences in pigmentation between
the North and the South of Germany. At the same time it showed the
similarity in blondness between all the peoples along the Baltic. The
Hohenzollern territory was as Teutonic in this respect as the
Hanoverian.”
73 : 6. Deniker is one of these. See his Races of Man, p. 334.
Collignon is another. See the Bulletin de la Société d’anthropologie,
Paris, 1883, p. 463; and L’Anthropologie, no. 2, for 1890.
73 : 11. See Keith, 3, p. 19; Beddoe, 4, p. 39; and Ripley, section on
Germany.
73 : 19. Beddoe, 4, pp. 39–40; Deniker, 2, p. 339; Ripley, p. 294.
74 : 12. See the note to p. 198 : 22.
Italians 2,259,933
Spaniards 1,492,848
French 225,049
English 56,448
Austrians 81,186
Swiss 33,326
Germans 62,329
Belgians 23,091
Russians 135,962
Ottomans 121,177
Other nationalities 189,664
The natives are mostly of the Malayan race with the exception of
25,000 Negrito tribesmen.
78 : 24. Dutch East Indies. The figures are taken from the census
of 1905.
Total population is approximately 38,000,000
Europeans 80,910
Chinese 563,000
Arabs 29,000
Other Orientals 23,000
78 : 25. British India. The figures are from the census of 1911:
119: 1. See the Osborn tables. As evidence of far earlier dates of the
Neolithic in the east we may quote Sir A. J. Evans, 2, p. 721. He
calculates that the earliest settlement at Knossos in Crete, which was
Neolithic, is about 12,000 years old, for he assumes that in the
western court of the palace the average rate of deposit was fairly
continuous. Professor Montelius, in L’Anthropologie, t. XVII, p. 137,
argues from the stratigraphy of finds at Susa that the beginning of
the Neolithic Age in the east may be dated about 18,000 B. C.
119: 6. See the note to p. 147.
119: 15. Balkh. Balkh, in Afghanistan, was the capital of Bactria, the
ancient name of the country between the range of the Hindu Kush
and the Oxus, and is now for the most part a mass of ruins, situated
on the right bank of the Balkh River. The antiquity and greatness of
the place are recognized by the native populations who speak of it as
the “Mother of Cities,” and it is certain that at a very early date it was
the rival of Ecbatana, Nineveh, and Babylon.
Bactria was subjugated by Cyrus and from then on formed one of
the satrapies of the Persian Empire. Zaborowski, 1, p. 43, says: “After
the conquests of Alexander there was founded a Greco-Bactrian
kingdom ... which embraced Sogdiana, Bactria and Afghanistan. The
Greco-Bactrian kings struck a quantity of coins. They bore a double
legend, the one Greek, the other still called Bactrian, which is not
Zend, nor even the language really spoken in Bactria. It is a popular
dialect derived from Sanskrit.” Again on p. 185: “Zend has been
called, and is still called, Bactrian or Old Bactrian, it may be because
Bactria has been conceived as the original country or an ancient
place of sojourn of the Persians; it may be because Zoroaster, a
Median Magus, had, according to a legend, fled to the Bactrians
where he found protection under Prince Vishtaspa. Eulogy of this
prince is often incorporated in the sayings of Zoroaster.”
Later a new race appeared, tribes called Scythians by the Greeks,
amongst which the Tochari, identical with the Yuë-Chih of the
Chinese, were the most important. According to Chinese sources,
they entered Sogdiana in 159 B. C.; in 139 they conquered Bactria,
and during the next generation they had made an end to the Greek
rule in eastern Iran. In the middle of the first century B. C. the whole
of eastern Iran and western India belonged to the great “Indo-
Scythian” Empire. In the third century the Kushan dynasty began to
decline; about 320 A. D. the Gupta Empire was founded in India. In
the fifth the Ephtalites, or “White Huns,” subjugated Bactria; then
the Turks, about A. D. 560, overran the country north of the Oxus. In
1220 Jenghis Khan sacked Balkh and levelled all buildings capable of
defence, while Timur repeated this treatment in the fourteenth
century. Notwithstanding this, Marco Polo could still, in the
following century, describe it as “a noble city and a great.”
See also Raphael Pumpelly, Explorations in Turkestan, where
10,000 years is said to be the age of the remains of early civilization.
More modern authorities, however, do not accept these ancient
dates.
119: 21. Osborn, 1, p. 479.
120: 1 seq. Osborn, 1, pp. 493–495; Ripley, pp. 486–487, and also
S. Reinach, 3, and G. Sergi, 2, pp. 199–220.
120: 28 seq. Oman, England before the Norman Conquest, pp.
642 seq., says: “The position which he [Harold] chose is that where
the road from London to Hastings emerges from the forest, on the
ground named Senlac, where the village of Rattle now stands.... This
hill formed the battleground.... On reaching the lower slopes of the
English position the archers began to let fly their shafts, and not
without effect, for as long as the shooting was at long range, there
was little reply, since Harold had but few bowmen in his ranks, (the
Fyrd, it is said, came to the fight with no defensive weapons but the
shield, and were ill-equipped, with javelins and instruments of
husbandry turned to warlike uses), and the abattis, whatever its
length or height, would not give complete protection to the English.
But when the advance reached closer quarters, it was met with a
furious hail of missiles of all sorts—darts, lances, casting axes, and
stone clubs such as William of Poictiers describes, and the Bayeux
Tapestry portrays—rude weapons, more appropriate to the neolithic
age.... Many a moral has been drawn from this great fight.... Neither
desperate courage, nor numbers that must have been at least equal
to those of the invader, could save from defeat an army which was
composed in too great a proportion of untrained troops, and which
was behind the times in its organization.... But the English stood by
the customs of their ancestors, and, a few years before, Earl Ralph’s
attempt to make the thegnhood learn cavalry tactics (see the Anglo-
Saxon Chronicle), had been met by sullen resistance and had no
effect.”
121 : 4. See the note top. 128 : 2.
121 : 15. F. Keller, The Lake-Dwellings of Switzerland and Other
Parts of Europe; Schenck, La Suisse préhistorique, pp. 533–549; G.
and A. de Mortillet, Le Préhistorique, part 3, and Munro, The Lake
Dwellings of Europe. The lake-dwelling, known as Pont de la Thièle,
between the lakes of Bienne and Neuchâtel, according to Grilliéron’s
calculations, is dated 5000 B. C. See Keller, p. 462; Lyell, Antiquity