Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full download Cohen's Pathways of the Pulp 12th Edition Louis H. Berman Dds Facd file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download Cohen's Pathways of the Pulp 12th Edition Louis H. Berman Dds Facd file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download Cohen's Pathways of the Pulp 12th Edition Louis H. Berman Dds Facd file pdf all chapter on 2024
https://ebookmass.com/product/cohens-pathways-of-the-pulp-expert-
consult-12th-edition-kenneth-m-hargreaves/
https://ebookmass.com/product/dermoscopy-the-essentials-3rd-
edition-h-peter-soyer-md-facd-autor/
https://ebookmass.com/product/ebook-pdf-theatre-brief-12th-
edition-by-robert-cohen/
https://ebookmass.com/product/biology-12th-edition-peter-h-raven/
Gradual Greg Berman
https://ebookmass.com/product/gradual-greg-berman/
https://ebookmass.com/product/win-or-learn-harlan-cohen-cohen/
https://ebookmass.com/product/disease-pathways-an-atlas-of-human-
disease-signaling-pathways-anastasia-nesterova-et-al/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-handbook-of-religion-and-
communication-1st-ed-edition-yoel-cohen/
https://ebookmass.com/product/nonwood-plant-fibers-for-pulp-and-
paper-1st-edition-pratima-bajpai/
Cohen’s TWELFTH
EDITION
PATHWAYS
of
the
PULP
EDITORS
LOUIS H. BERMAN, DDS, FACD
Clinical Associate Professor
Department of Endodontics
School of Dentistry
University of Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland
Faculty
Albert Einstein Medical Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Private Practice
Annapolis Endodontics
Annapolis, Maryland
Diplomate, American Board of Endodontics
Web Editor
ILAN ROTSTEIN, DDS
Associate Dean of Continuing Education and Chair
Division of Endodontics, Orthodontics, and General Practice Dentistry
Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California
ELSEVIER
3251 Riverport Lane
St. Louis, Missouri 63043
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or
mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without
permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to seek permission, further information about the
Publisher’s permissions policies and our arrangements with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance
Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency, can be found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions.
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the Publisher
(other than as may be noted herein).
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience
broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical treatment
may become necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating
and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such
information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including
parties for whom they have a professional responsibility.
With respect to any drug or pharmaceutical products identified, readers are advised to check the most
current information provided (i) on procedures featured or (ii) by the manufacturer of each product to
be administered, to verify the recommended dose or formula, the method and duration of administra-
tion, and contraindications. It is the responsibility of practitioners, relying on their own experience and
knowledge of their patients, to make diagnoses, to determine dosages and the best treatment for each
individual patient, and to take all appropriate safety precautions.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors, assume
any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability,
negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas
contained in the material herein.
Printed in Canada
Louis H. Berman
Dr. Berman received his dental degree from the University of Maryland School of
Dentistry and his Certificate in Endodontics from the Albert Einstein Medical Center. He
is Clinical Associate Professor of Endodontics at the University of Maryland School of
Dentistry and a Clinical Instructor and Guest Lecturer at the Albert Einstein Medical
Center. He has lectured internationally in the field of endodontics and has published in
several peer-reviewed international dental journals as well as co-authoring textbook
chapters on numerous topics in various endodontic textbooks. He is past president of
the Maryland State Association of Endodontics and is a member of the Journal of End-
odontics Scientific Advisory Board. A Diplomate of the American Board of Endodontics
and Fellow of the American College of Dentistry, Dr. Berman has been in full-time
private practice in Annapolis, Maryland since 1983.
Kenneth M. Hargreaves
Dr. Hargreaves is Professor and Chair of the Department of Endodontics at the
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio. He is a Diplomate of
the American Board of Endodontics and maintains a private practice limited to
endodontics. He is an active researcher, lecturer, and teacher and serves as the
Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Endodontics. He is principal investigator on several
nationally funded grants that combine his interests in pain, pharmacology, and
regenerative endodontics. He has received several awards, including a National In-
stitutes of Health MERIT Award for pain research, the AAE Louis I. Grossman
Award for cumulative publication of research studies, and two IADR Distinguished
Scientist Awards.
Ilan Rotstein
Dr. Rotstein is Professor and Chair of Endodontics, Orthodontics, and General Practice
Residency and Associate Dean at the Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry of the Univer-
sity of Southern California in Los Angeles. He is on the Executive Leadership Team of the
School of Dentistry and an ambassador member of the University of Southern California.
He has served in leadership roles for various dental organizations, including Chair of
the International Federation of Endodontic Associations’ Research Committee; as a
committee member of the American Association of Endodontists and European Society
of Endodontology; and as a scientific reviewer for international endodontic and dental
journals. He has also served as President of the Southern California Academy of Endo-
dontists, Israel Endodontic Society, and International Association for Dental Research—
Israel Division and as Chair of the Israel National Board of Diplomates in Endodontics.
Dr. Rotstein has published more than 150 scientific papers and research abstracts in
the dental literature as well as chapters in international endodontic textbooks, includ-
ing Pathways of the Pulp, Ingle’s Endodontics, Endodontics: Principles and Practice, Seltzer
and Bender’s Dental Pulp, and Harty’s Endodontics in Clinical Practice. He has lectured
extensively in more than 25 countries throughout 5 continents.
iii
This page intentionally left blank
Dr. John Ingle
The development of every edition of Cohen’s Pathways of the Washington Study established proof of outcome for endo
Pulp, for all of its editors and contributors, is a journey into dontic treatment and remains a seminal work in the
both the future and the past of endodontics. What we as literature for our field.
clinicians know today and the care that knowledge enables New fields offer many new challenges to their pioneers,
us to provide to our patients are the result of the curiosity, and Dr. Ingle soon turned his attention to the development
dedication, and commitment of the teachers, researchers, of standardization of endodontic instruments. His work
and clinicians who have come before us. Dr. John Ingle, resulted in the metric measurements and the 0.2 taper of
who contributed to the science, practice, and teaching endodontics files that were established in 1957.
of endodontics for more than 7 decades, is one of those In 1965, Dr. Ingle brought together his experience
extraordinary pioneers. as both a clinician and an educator in the publication of
Dr. Ingle began his career as an educator at the Univer- his foundational textbook Ingle’s Endodontics. Now in its
sity of Washington in Seattle, where he taught periodon- sixth edition, Ingle’s Endodontics has provided an essential
tics. While teaching, he became interested in the new field evidence-based reference to students and clinicians for
of endodontics and, perhaps drawing on the example of more than 50 years.
his pioneer great-grandfather, Daniel Boone, he entered While Dr. Ingle’s many accomplishments are known and
a specialty program in endodontics at the University of admired, the attributes of his character are equally revered.
Michigan to explore this new discipline, earning graduate Dr. Ingle was modest about his many contributions to end-
degrees in endodontics and periodontics. odontics and was unfailingly generous in his support and
As an educator and clinician, Dr. Ingle knew the impor- encouragement of others. The compassion and empathy
tance of evidence in establishing the efficacy of endodontic that motivated his work were experienced by all those he
treatment as a new specialty. To meet this need, he evalu- touched throughout his long and exemplary career and life.
ated the results of endodontic treatment in 3000 patients It is with profound gratitude and appreciation that we
and presented his findings to the annual session of dedicate this twelfth edition of Cohen’s Pathways of the Pulp
the American Association of Endodontists in 1953. The to Dr. John Ingle, a scholar, a leader, and a gentleman.
v
Contributors
Abdulaziz A. Bakhsh, BDS, MClinDent, Nicholas Chandler, BDS (Lond), MSc (Manc),
MEndo (RCSed) PhD (Lond), LDSRCS (Eng), MRACDS (Endo),
Endodontist FDSRCPS (Glas), FDSRCS (Edin), FFDRCSI, FICD
Department of Restorative Dentistry Professor of Endodontics
Faculty of Dentistry Faculty of Dentistry
Umm Al-Qura University University of Otago
Makkah, Saudi Arabia Dunedin, New Zealand
Bettina Basrani, DDS, PhD Gary S.P. Cheung, PhD, BDS, MDS, MSc, FHKAM,
Program Director FCDSHK (Endo), SFHEA, FICD, FAMS, FRACDS,
MSc Endodontics MRACDS (Endo), FDSRCSEd
Department of Endodontics Clinical Professor
University of Toronto Division of Restorative Dental Sciences
Toronto, Canada Associate Dean of Undergraduate Education
Faculty of Dentistry
Ellen Berggreen, PhD University of Hong Kong
Professor Pokfulam, Hong Kong
Biomedicine
University of Bergen Till Dammaschke, Prof, Dr Med Dent
Head of Research Dentist and Assistant Medical Director
Vestland County Department of Periodontology and Operative Dentistry
Bergen, Norway Westphalian Wilhelms University
Münster, Germany
Louis H. Berman, DDS, FACD
Clinical Associate Professor Didier Dietschi, DMD, PhD, Privat-Docent
Department of Endodontics Senior Lecturer
School of Dentistry School of Dental Medicine
University of Maryland Department of Cardiology and Endodontics
Baltimore, Maryland University of Geneva
Faculty Geneva, Switzerland
Albert Einstein Medical Center Adjunct Professor
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania School of Dentistry
Private Practice Department of Comprehensive Care
Annapolis Endodontics Case Western Reserve University
Annapolis, Maryland Cleveland, Ohio
Diplomate, American Board of Endodontics
Anibal Diogenes, DDS, MS, PhD
George Bogen, BS, DDS Assistant Professor
Senior Lecturer Endodontics
Department of Endodontics University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
School of Dentistry San Antonio, Texas
University of Queensland
Brisbane, Australia Melissa Drum, DDS, MS
Diplomate, American Board of Endodontics Professor and Advanced Endodontics Director
Endodontics
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio
vi
CONTRIBUTORS vii
Conor Durack, BDS NUI, MFDS RCSI, James L. Gutmann, DDS, Cert Endo, PhD, FICD,
MClinDent (Endo), MEndo RCS (Lond) FACD, FIAD, FAAHD, FDSRCSEd, Dipl ABE
Specialist Endodontist and Practice Partner Professor, Chair, and Postdoctoral Program Director
Riverpoint Specialist Dental Clinic Endodontics
Limerick, Ireland College of Dental Medicine
Nova Southeastern University
Bing Fan, DDS, PhD Davie, Florida
Professor and Chair Professor Emeritus
Endodontic Center Restorative Sciences/Endodontics
School and Hospital of Stomatology College of Dentistry
Wuhan University Texas A&M University
Wuhan City, China Dallas, Texas
Adjunct Professor Honorary Professor
Department of Endodontics Stomatology
Dental College of Georgia School of Stomatology
Augusta University Wuhan University
Augusta, Georgia Wuhan, China
The radiographic interpretation of odontogenic and non Science Topics, and Part III: Advanced Clinical Topics. The
odontogenic lesions is exactly that: an “interpretation.” twelve chapters in Part 1 focus on the core clinical con
This new twelfth edition boasts a completely new chapter cepts for dental students, while the chapters in Parts II and
entitled Lesions That Mimic Endodontic Pathosis that eluci III provide the information that advanced students and
dates and differentiates lesions that may appear as endo endodontic residents and clinicians need to know. In addi
dontic origin. This is a perfect adjunct to the chapters on tion, three additional chapters are included in the online
Diagnosis and Radiographic Interpretation. version.
The chapter on Managing Iatrogenic Events has been The new organization better reflects the chronology of
completely rewritten to include an expansive section on endodontic treatment.
injury to the inferior alveolar nerve.
Damage to the inferior alveolar nerve secondary to endo
dontic treatment is an avoidable dilemma. There is now Digital Content
specific content elaborating on the avoidance and manage
ment of these types of injuries. New features included on the companion site include:
Root resorption and root fractures can be some of the n Three chapters found exclusively online:
most difficult defects to clinically manage. The Root Resorp n Chapter 26: Bleaching Procedures
tion chapter on these subjects has been completely updated n Chapter 27: Endodontic Records and Legal Responsi
and will prove beneficial to the clinician and academician.
bilities
This edition updates all of the previous chapters to reflect n Chapter 28: Key Principles of Endodontic Practice
the changes in the literature since the last edition.
Management
n Case Studies
Review Articles
New Chapter Organization n
n Review Questions
n Videos
Chapters have been reorganized and grouped into three parts:
Part I: The Core Science of Endodontics, Part II: Advanced
x
Introduction
The foundation of the specialty of endodontics is a gift from clinician, or with the augmented reality of digital microsur-
the generations of great endodontists and researchers be- gical devices? In the years to come, will we be able to truly
fore us. They guided us with the goals of treatment, the eliminate all of the canal microorganisms, biofilms, and
benefits of their advancements, and the frailties of their pulpal tissue? Will we be facilitating our canal cleaning with
deficiencies. From volumes of research, we have collectively less toxic and more directed irrigants? Once we are finally
built a virtual library of knowledge that leads us to the evi- able to totally clean and disinfect the canals to a microscopic
dence we need for mastering our clinical procedures and level, will we have an obturation material that finally satis-
benefiting our patients. As we look into our future, we fies ALL the material requirements that Dr. Louis Grossman
should be directed toward developing the necessary tools enumerated at the inception of our specialty? Will this obtu-
for maximizing our outcomes with consistency, longevity, rating material be newly regenerated vital pulp?
and, above all, patient well-being. Clearly, our endodontic future lies in out-of-the-box
Over the past several decades, we have gone from arsenic thinking, with the next generation of transformations
to sodium hypochlorite, from bird droppings to gutta- coming with collaborations not just from within the bio-
percha, from hand files to motor-driven files, from culturing logical sciences, but also in conjunction with physicists,
to one-visit appointments, from 2D to 3D radiography, and chemists, engineers, and a multitude of other great inno-
from pulp removal to pulpal regeneration. Yet still, the vative minds. The predictability of endodontics must be
clinical and academic controversies are pervasive. incontestable, not just with better technology to guide us
With patients living longer and with the inescapable toward greater success, but also to better elucidate exactly
comparison of endodontics to endosseous implants, the when endodontic treatment cannot be successful. Our fu-
demand for endodontic excellence has greatly increased. ture needs to focus on predictability and consistency, which
Surprisingly, we still base our diagnosis on a presumed and will only be achieved with disruptive technologies, rather
almost subjective pulpal status. Imagine a future in which than persisting with variations and modifications of our
endodontic diagnosis could be made more objective by current convictions. As a specialty, we have advanced by
noninvasively scanning the pulp tissue. Imagine algorithms leaps and bounds since our inception; but we are still in our
built into all digital radiography for interpreting and infancy with a brilliant future ahead of us. Since 1976,
extrapolating disease processes. CBCT has made a huge and now with 12 editions, Cohen’s Pathways of the Pulp has
impact on endodontic diagnosis, but can we enhance these always been about the art and science of endodontics, with
digital captures with a resolution that would approach an emphasis on evidenced-based direction rather than an-
microcomputed tomography, and with less radiation? Will ecdotal guidance. The dedicated contributing authors have
these 3D scans guide us not just with diagnostic objectivity, generously given their time to meticulously describe what
but also with direct treatment facilitation to guide us dur- is considered the state of the art of our specialty. We are
ing surgical and nonsurgical treatment? Truly, we are now hopeful that future editions will guide us toward enhanced
on the cusp of gaining the knowledge and technology endodontic outcomes, with the never-ending pursuit of
for accomplishing this. As for clinical visualization, will 3D endodontic excellence.
visualization and monitor-based observation change the
way we visualize and implement our procedures? Will our Louis H. Berman
procedures still be done with the fine motor skills of the Kenneth M. Hargreaves
xi
Contents
5 Case Assessment and Treatment Planning, 139 19 Management of Endodontic Emergencies, 737
PAUL A. ROSENBERG and MATTHEW MALEK FABRICIO B. TEIXEIRA and GARY S.P. CHEUNG
7 Tooth Morphology and Pulpal Access 21 The Role of Endodontics After Dental Traumatic
Cavities, 192 Injuries, 808
JAMES L. GUTMANN and BING FAN BILL KAHLER
8 Cleaning and Shaping of the Root Canal 22 Chronic Cracks and Fractures, 848
System, 236 LOUIS H. BERMAN and AVIAD TAMSE
OVE A. PETERS, CHRISTINE I. PETERS, and BETTINA BASRANI
23 Restoration of the Endodontically
9 Obturation of the Cleaned and Shaped Root Canal Treated Tooth, 870
System, 304 DIDIER DIETSCHI, SERGE BOUILLAGUET, AVISHAI SADAN,
ANITA AMINOSHARIAE, WILLIAM T. JOHNSON, JAMES C. KULILD, and KENNETH M. HARGREAVES
and FRANKLIN TAY
24 Vital Pulp Therapy, 902
10 Nonsurgical Retreatment, 343 GEORGE BOGEN, TILL DAMMASCHKE, and NICHOLAS CHANDLER
ROBERT S. RODA, BRADLEY H. GETTLEMAN, and SCOTT C. JOHNSON
25 Endo-Perio, 939
11 Periradicular Surgery, 411 GERALD N. GLICKMAN and VINCENT J. IACONO
BRADFORD R. JOHNSON, MOHAMED I. FAYAD,
and LOUIS H. BERMAN
xii
PART I
Art and Science of Diagnosis and carefully interpreting the answers. In essence, the pro-
cess of determining the existence of an oral pathosis is the
Diagnosis is the art and science of detecting and distin- culmination of the art and science of making an accurate
guishing deviations from health and the cause and nature diagnosis.
thereof.6 The purpose of a diagnosis is to determine what The process of making a diagnosis can be divided into five
problem the patient is having and why the patient is having stages:
that problem. Ultimately, this will directly relate to what
1. The patient tells the clinician the reasons for seeking
treatment, if any, will be necessary. No appropriate treat-
advice.
ment recommendation can be made until all of the whys
2. The clinician questions the patient about the symptoms
are answered. Therefore, careful data gathering as well as
and history that led to the visit.
a planned, methodical, and systematic approach to this
3. The clinician performs objective clinical tests.
investigatory process is crucial.
4. The clinician correlates the objective findings with the
Gathering objective data and obtaining subjective find-
subjective details and creates a tentative list of differential
ings are not enough to formulate an accurate clinical
diagnoses.
diagnosis. The data must be interpreted and processed to
5. The clinician formulates a definitive diagnosis.
determine what information is significant, and what infor-
mation might be questionable. The facts need to be col- This information is accumulated by means of an orga-
lected with an active dialogue between the clinician and nized and systematic approach that requires considerable
the patient, with the clinician asking the right questions clinical judgment. The clinician must be able to approach
2
1 • Diagnosis 3
the problem by crafting what questions to ask the patient and complete update of the patient’s medical history should
and how to ask these pertinent questions. Careful listening be taken if the patient has not been seen for over a year.51,52
is paramount to begin painting the picture that details the Baseline blood pressure and pulse should be recorded for
patient’s complaint. These subjective findings combined the patient at each treatment visit. Elevation in blood pres-
with the results of diagnostic tests provide the critical infor- sure or a rapid pulse rate may indicate an anxious patient
mation needed to establish the diagnosis. who may require a stress reduction protocol, or it may indi-
Neither the art nor the science is effective alone. Estab- cate that the patient has hypertension or other cardiovas-
lishing a differential diagnosis in endodontics requires a cular health problems. Referral to a physician or medical
unique blend of knowledge, skills, and the ability to inter- facility may be indicated. It is imperative that vital signs
pret and interact with a patient in real time. Questioning, be gathered at each treatment visit for any patient with
listening, testing, interpreting, and finally answering the a history of major medical problems. The temperature
ultimate question of why will lead to an accurate diagnosis of patients presenting with subjective fever or any signs or
and in turn result in a more successful treatment plan. symptoms of a dental infection should be taken.57,80,105
The clinician should evaluate a patient’s response to the
CHIEF COMPLAINT health questionnaire from two perspectives: (1) those medi-
cal conditions and current medications that will necessitate
On arrival for a dental consultation, the patient should com- altering the manner in which dental care will be provided
plete a thorough registration that includes information per- and (2) those medical conditions that may have oral mani-
taining to medical and dental history (Figs. 1.1 and 1.2). festations or mimic dental pathosis.
This should be signed and dated by the patient, as well as Patients with serious medical conditions may require
initialed by the clinician as verification that all of the sub- either a modification in the manner in which the dental
mitted information has been reviewed (see Chapter 27 for care will be delivered or a modification in the dental treat-
more information). ment plan (Box 1.1). In addition, the clinician should be
The reasons patients give for consulting with a clinician aware if the patient has any drug allergies or interactions,
are often as important as the diagnostic tests performed. allergies to dental products, an artificial joint prosthesis,
Their remarks serve as initial important clues that will help organ transplants, or is taking medications that may nega-
the clinician to formulate a correct diagnosis. Without tively interact with common local anesthetics, analgesics,
these direct and unbiased comments, objective findings sedatives, and antibiotics.80 This may seem overwhelming,
may lead to an incorrect diagnosis. The clinician may find a but it emphasizes the importance of obtaining a thorough
dental pathosis, but it may not contribute to the pathologic and accurate medical history while considering the various
condition that mediates the patient’s chief complaint. In- medical conditions and dental treatment modifications that
vestigating these complaints may indicate that the patient’s may be necessary before dental treatment is provided.
concerns are related to a medical condition or to recent Several medical conditions have oral manifestations,
dental treatment. Certain patients may even receive initial which must be carefully considered when attempting to
emergency treatment for pulpal or periapical symptoms in arrive at an accurate dental diagnosis. Many of the oral
a general hospital.93 On occasion, the chief complaint is soft-tissue changes that occur are more related to the medi-
simply that another clinician correctly or incorrectly ad- cations used to treat the medical condition rather than to
vised the patient that he or she had a dental problem, with the condition itself. More common examples of medication
the patient not necessarily having any symptoms or any side effects are stomatitis, xerostomia, petechiae, ecchymo-
objective pathosis. Therefore, the clinician must pay close ses, lichenoid mucosal lesions, and bleeding of the oral soft
attention to the actual expressed complaint, determine the tissues.80
chronology of events that led to this complaint, and ques- When developing a dental diagnosis, a clinician must
tion the patient about other pertinent issues, including also be aware that some medical conditions can have
medical and dental history. For future reference and in order clinical presentations that mimic oral pathologic
to ascertain a correct diagnosis, the patient’s chief com- lesions.13,28,32,74,80,102,107,133 For example, tuberculosis in-
plaint should be properly documented, using the patient’s volvement of the cervical and submandibular lymph nodes
own words. can lead to a misdiagnosis of lymph node enlargement
secondary to an odontogenic infection. Lymphomas can
MEDICAL HISTORY involve these same lymph nodes.80 Immunocompromised
patients and patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
The clinician is responsible for taking a proper medical his- respond poorly to dental treatment and may exhibit recur-
tory from every patient who presents for treatment. Numer- ring abscesses in the oral cavity that must be differentiated
ous examples of medical history forms are available from a from abscesses of dental origin.43,76,80,83 Patients with iron
variety of sources, or clinicians may choose to customize deficiency anemia, pernicious anemia, and leukemia fre-
their own forms. After the form is completed by the patient, quently exhibit paresthesia of the oral soft tissues. This find-
or by the parent or guardian in the case of a minor, the cli- ing may complicate making a diagnosis when other dental
nician should review the responses with the patient, par- pathosis is present in the same area of the oral cavity. Sickle
ent, or guardian, and then initial the medical history form cell anemia has the complicating factor of bone pain, which
to indicate that this review has been done. The patient “of mimics odontogenic pain, and loss of trabecular bone pat-
record” should be questioned at each treatment visit to tern on radiographs, which can be confused with radio-
determine whether there have been any changes in the graphic lesions of endodontic origin. Multiple myeloma can
patient’s medical history or medications. A more thorough result in unexplained mobility of teeth. Radiation therapy
4 PART I • The Core Science of Endodontics
1. Are you experiencing any pain at this time? If not, please go to question 6. Yes No
2. If yes, can you locate the tooth that is causing the pain? Yes No
5. Please check the frequency and quality of the discomfort, and the number that most closely
reflects the intensity of your pain:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Constant Sharp
Intermittent Dull
Momentary Throbbing
Occasional
If yes, what?
If yes, what?
When eating or drinking, is your tooth sensitive to: Heat Cold Sweets
Does your tooth hurt when you bite down or chew? Yes No
Does it hurt if you press the gum tissue around this tooth? Yes No
Does a change in posture (lying down or bending over) cause your tooth to hurt? Yes No
8. Has a restoration (filling or crown) been placed on this tooth recently? Yes No
9. Prior to this appointment, has root canal therapy been initiated on this tooth? Yes No
10. Is there anything else we should know about your teeth, gums, or sinuses that would assist us in our
diagnosis?
Fig. 1.1 Dental history form that also allows the patient to record pain experience in an organized and descriptive manner.
1 • Diagnosis 5
How would you rate your health? Please circle one. Excellent Good Fair Poor
If you are under the care of a physician, please give reason(s) for treatment.
Name Address
Date
Have you ever had any trouble with prolonged bleeding after surgery? Yes No
Do you wear a pacemaker or any other kind of prosthetic device? Yes No
Are you taking any kind of medication or drugs at this time? Yes No
If yes, please give name(s) of the medicine(s) and reason(s) for taking them:
Name Reason
Have you ever had an unusual reaction to an anesthetic or drug (like penicillin)? Yes No
Is there any other information that should be known about your health?
Fig. 1.2 Succinct, comprehensive medical history form designed to provide insight into systemic conditions that could produce or affect the patient’s
symptoms, mandate alterations in treatment modality, or change the treatment plan.
6 PART I • The Core Science of Endodontics
Fig. 1.3 When taking a dental history and performing a diagnostic examination, often a premade form can facilitate complete and accurate documen-
tation. (Courtesy Dr. Ravi Koka, San Francisco, CA.)
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Devil's
picture-books
This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United
States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away
or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License
included with this ebook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you
are not located in the United States, you will have to check the
laws of the country where you are located before using this
eBook.
Language: English
Obvious typographical errors have been silently corrected. All other spelling and
punctuation remains unchanged.
Plate 1.
THE
DEVIL’S PICTURE-BOOKS
A History of Playing-Cards
BY
ILLUSTRATED
NEW YORK
DODD, MEAD, AND COMPANY
PUBLISHERS
Copyright, 1890
By Dodd, Mead, and Company
Burns.
THE DEVIL’S PICTURE-BOOKS.
THE TAROTS.
A youth of frolic, an old age of cards.
The first cards known in Europe, and which were named Tarots,
Tarocchi, etc., seem to differ in almost every respect from those of
the fifteenth century, although these probably inspired their invention.
The latter resemble much more those of the present day than they
do the original Tarots. The first packs consisted of seventy-eight
cards,—that is, of four suits of numeral cards; and besides these
there were twenty-two emblematical pictured cards, which were
called Atous, or Atouts,—a word which M. Duchesne, a French
writer, declares signifies “above all.” This word used in French has
the same meaning as our word Trump. The marks which distinguish
the Tarot suits are usually Swords, Cups, Sticks, and Money; and
each one consists of fourteen cards, ten of which are “pips” and
three or four “coat” cards,—namely, King, Queen, Knight, and
Knave. The Queen was not always admitted. These suits seem to be
the origin of the modern packs; and the emblems used on them have
been adopted in many countries where the Atout part was discarded
while the rest of the pack with its original symbols was retained.
Mr. Singer gives a graphic description of these cards and the
games to be played with them, and says that “among different
nations the suits [as will be hereafter shown] are distinguished by
marks peculiar to themselves, while only the general features of the
numbered cards headed by figures or court cards have been
retained.”
The second division of the Tarot pack, called Atouts, are
numbered up to twenty-one, each of these having its proper value;
and besides all these there is one, not numbered and not belonging
to the division of the suit cards, which is called a Fou, and in playing
the game is designated Mat, or il Matto. This “Joker,” as we should
term it, has no value of its own, but augments that of any of the
Atouts to which it may be joined, and is sometimes played instead of
a Queen, being then called “her Excuse.”
These Atouts are each represented by a print which is supposed
to resemble some character, and the name is generally placed on
the card. Among them are an Emperor, a Cupid, a Chariot, a Hermit,
a Gallows, Death, The Day of Judgment, a Pope, Fortune,
Temperance, Justice, the Moon, the Sun, etc. The order in which
they are placed is not always the same, and is seemingly
unimportant. The game may be played by two or four persons. “The
one who holds the ‘Fool’ regains his stake; ‘La Force’ (or Strength)
takes twice as much from the pool, while ‘La Mort’ (or Death) most
appropriately sweeps the board.”
It is said that the distribution of the suit cards has a peculiar
signification. Each one is distinguished by an emblem which
represents the four classes into which communities were once
divided. First comes the Churchman, represented by the Chalice (or
Copas); next in rank, the Warrior, whose emblem is the Sword; third,
the Merchant, symbolized by a Coin; and fourth, the Workman with
his Staff. It will be shown hereafter that almost all writers on the
subject allow the possibility of the divisions of the suits being shown
in the cards.
The earliest known specimens of these Tarot cards are now to be
found in the Cabinet des Estampes in Paris, and are supposed to
have formed part of the pack which was painted for King Charles the
Seventh of France in 1393, to cheer and amuse him during an illness
which had been caused by a coup-de-soleil in 1392, and which
made him a melancholy but not a dangerous lunatic. M. Paul la Croix
describes these Tarots as having been most delicately painted and
resembling in treatment the illuminations of manuscripts. They are
on a golden background on which dots forming an ornamental
pattern were impressed. A border of silver surrounded and as it were
framed each picture, through which a dotted line twisted spirally like
a ribbon. M. la Croix points out that this dotted line, in his language
technically termed a tare (which also means a “fault” or “defect”),
was a sort of fluting produced by small holes pricked into the
substance of which the cards were made, and fancies that to these
Tares the Tarots owe their name. Other writers, however, dispute this
derivation of the word, and discover new ones for themselves which
are generally quite as fanciful and far-fetched.
These well preserved Tarots are eighteen centimetres by nine, and
are painted in water colours on a thin card. The composition of the
figures is ingenious and artistic. The drawing is correct and full of
character, and the colours are still brilliant. A narrow border of black
and white checks surrounds each one. This border is a piece of
checkered paper pasted on the back of the card and neatly folded
over its edge as if to protect it, showing on the face of the card and
forming a frame for the pictures. This fashion of having a checkered
or diapered back was closely followed in many of the countries
where cards have been used; and these backs are still seen,
although this old pattern (which, as will hereafter be seen, had
probably a very interesting origin) has been generally discarded, and
each card-maker adopts a different device with which to decorate the
backs of his cards according to his own fancy. In France the backs
are generally plain, and coloured red, pink, or blue. In Spain the
pattern is dotted on the surface in lines and circles, while in other
countries interlaced and meaningless designs are employed.