Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full download Fifty Years of Evolution in Biological Research: Progress and Decline Jacques Balthazart file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download Fifty Years of Evolution in Biological Research: Progress and Decline Jacques Balthazart file pdf all chapter on 2024
https://ebookmass.com/product/fifty-years-of-
bangladesh-1971-2021-crises-of-culture-development-governance-
and-identity-taj-hashmi/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-evolution-of-moral-progress-a-
biocultural-theory-allen-buchanan/
https://ebookmass.com/product/a-caring-life-what-fifty-years-in-
nursing-has-taught-me-about-humanity-compassion-and-community-
keith-cox/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-evolution-of-biological-
information-how-evolution-creates-complexity-from-viruses-to-
brains-christoph-adami/
Biological Approaches to Controlling Pollutants:
Advances in Pollution Research Sunil Kumar
https://ebookmass.com/product/biological-approaches-to-
controlling-pollutants-advances-in-pollution-research-sunil-
kumar/
https://ebookmass.com/product/cheating-academic-integrity-
lessons-from-30-years-of-research-david-a-rettinger/
https://ebookmass.com/product/methods-for-human-history-studying-
social-cultural-and-biological-evolution-1st-ed-edition-patrick-
manning/
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-parody-exception-in-copyright-
law-sabine-jacques/
https://ebookmass.com/product/life-history-evolution-a-
biological-meta-theory-for-the-social-sciences-steven-c-hertler/
Fifty Years of Evolution in Biological Research
Series Editor
Marie-Christine Maurel
Jacques Balthazart
First published 2023 in Great Britain and the United States by ISTE Ltd and John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as
permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, this publication may only be reproduced,
stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with the prior permission in writing of the publishers,
or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms and licenses issued by the
CLA. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside these terms should be sent to the publishers at the
undermentioned address:
www.iste.co.uk www.wiley.com
Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the
author(s), contributor(s) or editor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of ISTE Group.
Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix
Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xi
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xv
Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151
Preface
May 2023
Acknowledgments
All the work I have published has been carried out with a large number of
collaborators, including more than 30 students doing their undergraduate
thesis (now renamed graduate work), 21 PhD students, 17 postdoctoral
students, 15 international collaborators who stayed in the laboratory for long
periods of time and finally my long-time collaborators with whom I have
worked for 10, 20 and sometimes 30 years with great pleasure and success.
xii Fifty Years of Evolution in Biological Research
It is impossible to mention all these people here and I will only mention the
collaborators who have played a major role in this story:
– Michael Schumacher, who developed the first measurement of
aromatase activity in the laboratory.
– Michelle Baillien, who developed a faster test for the activity of this
enzyme, based on the measurement of tritiated water production. She was
also instrumental in launching our research program on rapid regulation of
brain aromatase activity.
– Gian Carlo Panzica and his wife Carla Viglietti, from the University of
Turin, who taught me neuroanatomy and with whom I have published many
articles since 1986.
– Annemie Van der Linden (University of Antwerp), who introduced me
to the world of in vivo nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. We have
published regularly together since 1998.
– And of course Gregory (Greg) Ball, my scientific twin. He developed
an interest in ethology, endocrinology and neurosciences through paths very
similar to mine. Having received very similar training, we understood each
other from the beginning implicitly. In fact, one word evoked a whole stream
of ideas for us where others would have needed whole sentences to
understand. This collaboration which began in 1985 can be considered a
model, I think, of creativity, productivity and, above all, fun!
I would also like to offer special thanks to Charlotte Cornil who has
worked in collusion with me since her dissertation in 1999 and took over the
leadership of the behavioral neuroendocrinology research group when I
became emeritus in 2014.
And finally, I would like to publicly thank my wife Claire. She has not
only given me 50 years of love and two beautiful boys who now have
children of their own, that is our private life, but more relevantly for this
discussion concerning science, she has also been my friend and companion
during all these years, attentively encouraging me when I was demoralized,
giving me advice when I was in doubt and trying to calm me down when I
was irritated. And, above all, she created for me an incredibly favorable
environment for me to develop my work and my passion. For many, many
Acknowledgments xiii
years, she took on most, I should probably say almost all, of the burden of
daily life: all the tasks that go into raising a family and maintaining a
functional and very pleasant home. I will be forever grateful to her for what
she did for all those years when I was developing my scientific career.
Thank you, Claire, I love you!
Introduction
This book speaks of the profound changes which have affected the
conditions in which fundamental scientific research is pursued, i.e. research
motivated essentially, if not exclusively, by curiosity and the desire to
discover the laws that govern the functioning of the universe. It concerns
very directly research in biology and more particularly the field of
behavioral endocrinology which was the subject of the author’s studies, but
most of the observations and conclusions apply mutatis mutandis to all fields
of fundamental research.
two years. Quite quickly, the impact factor was more or less unconsciously
transformed into a measure of the quality of the articles themselves and thus
of the work of the researchers. This has resulted in a race to publish in
journals with a high impact factor, which in my opinion has been very
damaging for the overall quality of research. I will come back to this in more
detail.
At the same time, and whether or not this is related, we can discuss it, we
have seen a significant decrease in the confidence that the general public has
in the scientific process over the last 50 years. In 1960–1970, the general
public thought that science was able to solve all our problems and to lead us
to the Moon, which it did. Paradoxically, while scientific progress has never
been so important, we have witnessed in the last few decades a resurgence of
various irrational beliefs and a questioning of the value of the scientific
consensus. I will try to explain, at least in part, this surprising shift in public
opinion. The “profession” of researcher in biology has thus changed
considerably over the last 50 years, for the better (technical progress) and
also in a less positive way (various constraints, relative disaffection of the
general public). It is this change that I would like to present here.
The author’s scientific activity has indeed shifted over time from one
issue to another. Even though all these questions were intellectually linked, it
is clear that serendipity has played an important role in this evolution. These
changes in research themes were made through discoveries, meetings at
conferences, contacts with other researchers first by mail and then by e-mail,
and finally through the reading of particularly impressive articles. This
Introduction xvii
Over the past few decades, there has been an increasing tendency to
allocate research funds to respond to specific questions defined by planning
bodies. Thus, the majority of research credits distributed by the European
Union finance projects submitted in response to specific requests in a
defined field. This is what is known as the “top-down” approach: researchers
are asked to solve a specific problem. This approach works, of course, in
applied research, but not in fundamental research. For a long time,
fundamental research was based on a “bottom-up” approach, where
researchers propose a work program based on their interests and skills. The
federal research support agencies in the United States, the NIH (National
Institutes of Health) and the NSF (National Science Foundation) have made
extensive use of this funding method. This funding mode was also
widespread during the second half of the 20th century among the national
funds that finance research in the countries of Western Europe (Belgium,
France, Italy, etc.). Many countries, however, have gradually transferred
their resources to the European Community, which has become a major
source of research funding in Europe and has operated for 20–30 years
almost exclusively using the “top-down” model. This attitude has been
problematic for fundamental research and has led to the virtual
disappearance of entire fields of research in Europe. The creation of the ERC
(European Research Council) in 2007 has fortunately partially reversed this
situation, and this organization now funds research programs initiated by the
researchers themselves. It is only regrettable that the amount of money
distributed by the ERC remains far less (less than 20% of the total) than that
made available to researchers via the interventionist approach. One of the
goals of this book will therefore be to try to convince as wide an audience as
possible that the planning of fundamental science leads largely to its
sterilization.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
intellectual and cultural activities—Gary plan
provides a school adapted to every kind of a child—
Gary vocational training of peculiar benefit to young
worker—Gary plan keeps pupils in school—
Reasons why Gary school has national significance.
Appendix 179
Index 203
ILLUSTRATIONS