Professional Documents
Culture Documents
S23_4304_Ch5
S23_4304_Ch5
Summary of Results M ≡ (4π)ρ(a3 - b3) • These results are very important, especially
outside the shell those for R > a, Φ = -(GM)/R
R > a, Φ = -(GM)/R (1) This says: The potential at any point outside
The same as if M were a point mass at the origin! a spherically symmetric distribution of
completely inside the shell matter is independent of the size of the
R < b, Φ = -2πρG(a2 - b2) (2) distribution & is the same as that for a
Φ = constant, independent of position. point mass at the origin.
within the shell To calculate the potential for such a distribution we
b ≤ R ≤ a, Φ = -4πρG[a2- (b3/R) - R2] (3) can consider all mass to be concentrated at the center.
• Also, Φ is continuous!
If R → a, (1) & (3) are the same! If R → b, (2) & (3) are the same!
• Also, the results are very important for • Given the results for the potential Φ, we can compute
the GRAVITATIONAL FIELD g inside, outside &
within the spherical shell: g ≡ - ∇Φ
R < b, Φ = -2πρG(a2 - b2) • Φ depends on R only g is radially directed
g = g er = - (dΦ/dR)er [M ≡ (4π)ρ(a3 - b3)]
outside the shell R > a, g = - (GM)/R2
The potential is constant anywhere The same as if M were a point mass at the origin!
inside a spherical shell. completely inside the shell R < b, g = 0
The force on a test mass m Since Φ = constant, independent of position.
within the shell
inside the shell is 0!
b ≤ R ≤ a, g = (4π)ρG[(b3/R2) - R]
Example 5.2
• Plots of the
potential • Astronomical
measurements
Φ & the field g show that the
inside, outside & ← Φ = constant
orbital speed of
masses in spiral
within a Φ = -(GM)/R galaxies rotating
spherical shell. ↓ about their centers
is approximately
g ≡ - ∇Φ constant as a
g = - (dΦ/dR) g = - (GM)/R2 function of distance R from the galaxy center, as in the figure (for
↓ the Andromeda Galaxy). Show that this is inconsistent with the
galaxy having its mass concentrated at its center & can be explained
↑
if the galaxy mass increases with distance R from the center.
g=0
• Solution: Assume that the galaxy mass M has a spherically Example 5.3
symmetric distribution ρ. We can solve the problem, despite the fact that • Consider a thin, uniform circular ring of radius a & mass M.
the radius R might be hundreds of light years! The orbital speed v of a A small mass m is placed in the plane of the ring.
small mass m in orbit at R about the galaxy center is found (Phys. I!) by
Q: Find a position of equilibrium & determine if it is stable.
setting the gravitational force = (mass) x (centripetal acceleration)
or: [(GMm)/R2] = [m(v2)/R]
v = (GM/R)½ (1)
or: v R-½ (2)
If (2) is true, v vs. R would
be like the dashed curve! For the
solid (expt.) curve to be consistent
with (1) requires M = M(R) R CONCLUSION: There
must be more matter in a galaxy than is observed (“dark matter” =
~90% of mass in the universe). At the forefront of research.
• The equilibrium position is given by • Comparison of properties of gravitational fields with similar
properties of electrostatic fields (Maxwell’s equations!)
(dU/dr’) = 0 = -m(MGr’)/(2a3)
• Consider an arbitrary surface
r’ = 0 is an equilibrium position! S, as in the figure. A point
This should be obvious by symmetry! mass m is placed inside.
• Stability (or not) is obtained from the • Define:
2nd derivative: (d2U/dr’2) 0 = -m(MG)/(2a3) <0 Gravitational Flux
Þ r’ = 0 is a position of unstable through S: Φm ≡ ∫S n•g da
equilibrium! = “amount of g passing
(“Not obvious”!) through surface S”
n ≡ Unit vector normal to S at differential area da.
g: gravitational field vector
• Find the force on a • A Major Complication!! The surface of the Earth is not an
point mass m on the axis.
inertial system! (& Newton’s 2nd Law is valid in inertial systems only!)
Motion in non-inertial systems in general is discussed in Ch. 10!
• Related Complications:
– Earth & Moon rotate about their center of mass + also orbit the Sun.
– The Earth is rotating + the Moon is orbiting the Earth.
– Assume: The water nearest the Moon is is ~ “pulled away” from the
Earth & the water farthest away is ~ “pushed towards” the Earth.
• Results, both by the potential method & by direct force calculation:
• Before discussing even the simple model in Sect. 5.5, we’ll first
Fz = 2πρG[z(a2 + z2)-½ - 1] (<0 ) discuss the general Qualitative Physics of the Tides.
Effect of the Moon’s Gravitational Attraction This Effect is Superimposed on the Earth’s Rotation
on the Earth’s Oceans
Viewed from a
perspective
outside the
Moon-Earth
system:
Viewed from a
perspective at
the center of
the Earth:
Spring Tides & Neap Tides Spring Tides & Neap Tides
• The Sun also contributes to Earth’s • The Sun also contributes to Earth’s
tides. tides.
– When the Sun & Moon line up to produce – Neap Tides occur when the gravitational forces
higher tides, this is called Spring Tides. due to the Moon & the Sun partially cancel each
other.
Neap Tide
Spring Tide
• Newton’s 2nd Law (in the inertial • Goal: Find the vector
frame) for mass m: acceleration (d2r/dt2) as
m(d2rm′/dt2) = (Ftotal )m measured in the non-inertial
= (FG)m-E + (FG)m-M (1) system with origin at the
(FG)m-E = Gravitational force between the mass m & Earth. Earth’s center.
(FG)m-M = Gravitational force between the mass m & Moon. From the figure:
(Ftotal )m = - G(mMEr-2)er - G(mMmR-2)eR (2) r = rm′- rE′ (d2r/dt2) = (d2rm′/dt2) – (d2rE′/dt2) (5)
• Newton’s 2nd Law (in the inertial frame) for the Earth ME • Combining Eqs. (1) - (5) & doing some algebra gives:
(attraction to the Moon): (d2r/dt2) = -(GMEr-2)er -(GMm)[(eRR-2) - (eDD-2)] (6)
ME(d2rE′/dt2) = (Ftotal)E (3) 1st term ≡ acceleration of m due to Earth’s gravitational force
(Ftotal)E = Gravitational force between the Moon & the Earth.
2nd 2 terms ≡ acceleration from the Tidal Force (responsible
(Ftotal)E = - G(MEMmD-2)eD (4)
for tides) = difference between the gravitational acceleration
All F’s & r’s are vectors. All e’s are unit vectors! (arrows, hats left off!) due to the Moon, felt at Earth’s center & that due to the Moon,
felt on Earth’s surface. These are what we are interested in!
• The effect of the tidal force at various points on the • The Tidal Force on a mass m on the Earth’s surface:
Earth: The figure shows a polar view, with polar axis = z-axis FT = -GmMm[(eRR-2) - (eDD-2)] (7)
& looks at the force at different points (a,b,c,d) on the Earth.
• Look at various points on the Earth’s surface:
←--------------------- D ----------------------→ ←------------ D -------------------→
←------------------ R --------------------→
• At point a: The farthest point on Earth from the Moon:
At a, eR, eD are (approximately) in the same direction,
• The tidal force on a mass m on the Earth’s surface (using
along the x-axis. R > D The 2nd term dominates & FT is
only the 2nd 2 terms from Newton’s 2nd Law, Eq. (6)):
along the + x-axis, as in the diagram.
(d2r/dt2) = -(GMEr-2)er -(GMm)[(eRR-2) - (eDD-2)]
FT = m (d2r/dt2) = - GmMm[(eRR-2) - (eDD-2)] (7)
R = D +r
FTx -GmMm[(D+r)-2 - D-2)] ←------------ R --------------→
←------------ R --------------→ = -G(mMmD-2)[(1+{rD-1})-2 - 1]
Note that: |rD-1| ≈ 0.02 <<1
• At point b: The nearest point on Earth from the Moon: Expand (1+{rD-1})-2 in a Taylor’s series for small |rD-1|
At b, eR, eD are in (approximately) in the same direction, FTx -G(mMmD-2) [1- 2(r/D)+ 3(r/D)2 -....-1]
along the x-axis. R < D The 1st term dominates & FT is
or FTx + 2GmMmrD-3 (8)
along the + x-axis, as in the diagram. Also, r << D
• On the x-axis @ b: By the reasoning we just had, the force there
FT has approximately the same magnitude as at a, but it is (approx.) the same magnitude as in (8), but opposite in direction.
is in the opposite direction.
• The Tidal Force on a mass m on the Earth’s surface: • Summary of the (approximate) directions of
FT = -GmMm[(eRR-2) - (eDD-2)] (7) the tidal forces at points a, b, c, & d
←------------- D -------------------→
←-------------- R -------------------→
• At point c: eR is approximately parallel to eD x-components
of the 2 terms in FT approximately cancel because R D & the
x-components of eR & eD are approximately the same.
The y component of (7) at c, using eRy ≈ (rD-1) j is
FTy -G(mMm)rD-3 (Along the + y-axis, towards Earth’s center)
At point d: FTy has approximately the same magnitude as at d, but
it is along the negative y-axis, away from Earth’s center.
Example 5.5
• Calculate the maximum height change in the tides caused by
• This simple model of tidal forces has neglected
the Moon. Use the same simple model along with a solution
the effect of the Sun’s gravitational attraction! proposed by Newton himself! Imagine 2 wells; 1 in the direction
• A simple calculation shows: of the high tide (x-axis) & 1 in the direction of the low tide (y-axis).
• Actual tides are higher! Because of neglected effects, our • Actual tides are higher! Because of neglected effects, our
simple model is much too simple! simple model is much too simple!
For example: For example:
• 1. Earth is not covered with water! • 8. The plane of the Moon orbit around the Earth is not to
• 2. Land masses play role. the rotation axis One high tide per day is higher than the
• 3. Local effects can increase high tide levels to several other!
meters! • 9. Tidal friction results in the Earth “dragging” the ocean
• 4. Tidal friction between the water & the Earth causes energy with it as it rotates. This results in high tides not being
loss by Earth. along the Earth-Moon axis, but several degrees apart, as in
the figure on the next page.
• 5. Earth land masses aren’t rigid & are distorted by tidal
forces.
• 6. The Earth rotates.
• 7. The Moon orbits the Earth. All of these together mean that
there are not exactly 2 tides per day. (Time between them: 12
hr. 26 min.)
Cartoon of “Actual” Tides