Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full download Prophecy, Madness, and Holy War in Early Modern Europe Leigh T.I. Penman file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download Prophecy, Madness, and Holy War in Early Modern Europe Leigh T.I. Penman file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download Prophecy, Madness, and Holy War in Early Modern Europe Leigh T.I. Penman file pdf all chapter on 2024
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-war-within-private-interests-
and-the-fiscal-state-in-early-modern-europe-1st-ed-edition-joel-
felix/
https://ebookmass.com/product/architecture-and-the-politics-of-
gender-in-early-modern-europe-1st-edition-helen-hills-editor/
https://ebookmass.com/product/historicizing-life-writing-and-
egodocuments-in-early-modern-europe-james-r-farr/
https://ebookmass.com/product/economies-of-literature-and-
knowledge-in-early-modern-europe-change-and-exchange-subha-
mukherji/
The Dialectics of Orientalism in Early Modern Europe
1st Edition Marcus Keller
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-dialectics-of-orientalism-in-
early-modern-europe-1st-edition-marcus-keller/
https://ebookmass.com/product/womens-work-and-rights-in-early-
modern-urban-europe-1st-ed-edition-anna-bellavitis/
https://ebookmass.com/product/historicizing-life-writing-and-
egodocuments-in-early-modern-europe-palgrave-macmillan-2022-farr-
james-r/
https://ebookmass.com/product/loves-wounds-violence-and-the-
politics-of-poetry-in-early-modern-europe-1st-edition-nazarian/
https://ebookmass.com/product/lives-uncovered-a-sourcebook-of-
early-modern-europe-nicholas-terpstra/
Prophecy, Madness, and Holy War in Early Modern
Europe
OXFORD STUDIES IN WESTERN ESOTERICISM
Series Editor
Henrik Bogdan, University of Gothenburg
Editorial Board
Jean-Pierre Brach, École Pratique des Hautes Études
Carole Cusack, University of Sydney
Christine Ferguson, University of Stirling
Olav Hammer, University of Southern Denmark
Wouter Hanegraaff, University of Amsterdam
Ronald Hutton, University of Bristol
Jeffrey Kripal, Rice University
James R. Lewis, University of Tromsø
Michael Stausberg, University of Bergen
Egil Asprem, University of Stockholm
Dylan Burns, Freie Universität Berlin
Gordan Djurdjevic, Simon Fraser University
Peter Forshaw, University of Amsterdam
Jesper Aa. Petersen, Norwegian University of Science and Technology
MYSTIFYING KABBALAH
Academic Scholarship, National Theology, and
New Age Spirituality
Boaz Huss
SPIRITUAL ALCHEMY
From Jacob Boehme to
Mary Anne Atwood, 1600–1910
Mike A. Zuber
OCCULT IMPERIUM
Arturo Reghini, Roman Traditionalism, and the
Anti-Modern Reaction in Fascist Italy
Christian Giudice
You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same
condition on any acquirer.
Library of Congress Control Number: 2022058612
ISBN 978–0–19–762393–0
eISBN 978–0–19–762395–4
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197623930.001.0001
For Olija
Contents
Figures
Acknowledgements
A Note on Conventions
1. An Unknown Prophet
2. The Sins of the Fathers
3. Crisis and Rebirth
4. The Sword of God’s Vengeance
5. War and Peace
6. The End of Days
7. Spiritual Sons
Epilogue
Notes
Bibliography
Index
Figures
For by fire and by His sword will the Lord judge all flesh.
Isaiah 66:16
⋆⋆⋆
Although today Gifftheil has fallen into obscurity, an account of the
prophet’s life and exploits has long been a desideratum. His
contemporaries, fascinated by the divisive and tempestuous prophet,
desired such an account as a proof—or refutation—of his godly bona
fides. In the 1640s, one of Gifftheil’s long-time collaborators declared
that ‘a whole Volume could bee written of his strange Life.’4 In the
first decade of the eighteenth century, some forty years after the
prophet’s death, just such a manuscript vita circulated among
Europe’s religious dissenters, which even interested those who were
nominally opposed to his martial doctrines.5 Naturally, modern
historians have seen a different utility in such an account. Since the
nineteenth century, scholars have believed that a biographical
portrait of Gifftheil could furnish ‘deep insight into the religious
undercurrents’ of early modernity.6 In 1934, Ernst Benz, the doyen
of German church historians, declared that a monograph on the
prophet was ‘required urgently,’ both to inform scholarly debates on
the origins of German Pietism and to address the seventeenth-
century legacies of the Radical Reformation.7
This book offers the first full-length account of Gifftheil’s life,
thought, and exploits. From humble beginnings as the offspring of a
pastor’s family in the mountain ranges of the Swabian Jura, Gifftheil
earned his living as a barber surgeon before a succession of tragic
incidents—among them his father’s expulsion from successive
pastorates and his brother’s suicide—pushed him toward the fringes
of society. From December 1624 until his death in Amsterdam in
1661, Gifftheil wandered Europe as a prophet, one who uttered
divine speech. During this time he secured audiences with the great
and the good, certainly. But he also attempted to murder at least
two Lutheran pastors, demanded troops and gold bullion from
diverse authorities to pay for an army of Holy Warriors, escaped
from three prisons, and published at least 130 tracts and pamphlets
in several European languages. After his death, Gifftheil’s writings
were sent to leading Pietists such as Philip Jakob Spener and August
Hermann Francke, and were perused by Protestant missionaries
before they embarked on journeys to the Americas, India, the East
Indies, and Greenland. In the 1730s, Schwenckfelders fleeing
persecution in Europe carried with them to Pennsylvania manuscript
accounts of his adventures. Born from a family tragedy in rural
southwestern Germany, fired by a strange religious and political zeal,
Gifftheil’s ideas ultimately reached people across the world and
played a role, albeit a minor one, in the rise of Lutheran missions
and the story of global Christianity.
⋆⋆⋆
Biography and other contingent narratives are a fraught genre in
historiography, especially since the emergence of the ‘biographical
turn’ around 1980. According to critics, the narrative form of a
biographical study lacks partiality; a subject can easily be divorced
from their surroundings, and available evidence and knowledge of
‘what came next’ can be over-determinative. Questions have also
been raised about how representative the lives of extraordinary
individuals—like Gifftheil—can be.8 But the past is made up of a
diversity of voices, all of whose stories are valuable in illuminating
the conflicts and possibilities of the past.9 As a lay prophet, Gifftheil
offers an exceptionally unusual point of departure, for his story casts
new light on the murky underworld of seventeenth-century prophecy
and religious dissent.
Recent studies on prophecy in Lutheran Europe have overturned
prior scholarly opinion about the exceptionality of lay prophets in
early modern confessional culture. Once considered anomalous and
rare manifestations of ‘popular’ religious enthusiasm among the
lower classes, Jürgen Beyer’s indispensable work, in particular, has
demonstrated the seeming ubiquity of lay prophets and the diverse
backgrounds from which they stemmed. They could be found in
almost every territory, came from rural and urban areas, came from
all walks of life, could be young or old, married or unmarried, men or
women. Most were literate, some were educated, and many shared
modes of speech and comportment, often developed by imitating
local pastors.10 Despite their backgrounds, however, the vast
majority of these lay prophets preached messages of repentance
and penance, intended to increase piety within the territorial church.
Most, furthermore, were inspired by visions of angelic intelligences
to share their messages. Ludwig Friedrich Gifftheil, however, was
very different. He too was raised in the apocalyptic foment of
Lutheran confessional culture, but ultimately rejected its tenets in
favour of a heterodox spiritualist religiosity.11 He was one of a select
group described by theological opponents as a ‘new prophet,’ a
person who, in the guise of legitimate prophecy, sought to
challenge, not strengthen, the territorial churches.
The crucible of Gifftheil’s dissenting political and religious thought
lay in what Antoine Faivre has called the ‘theosophical current,’ a
central pillar of the esoteric tradition in Europe.12 As Carlos Gilly has
shown, the term theosophia emerged in dissenting religious circles
around 1570 to designate an unmediated godly knowledge, instead
of a knowledge won through study or observation. It was first used
to describe the teachings of the infamous Swiss physician
Paracelsus, whose suppressed theological doctrines encouraged
experimental wisdom and prophetic knowledge informed by the
‘lights of grace and nature.’ In 1580, Johann Arndt, who later
became a Lutheran pastor and an influence on Gifftheil, described
theosophia as the ‘true age-old philosophy,’ a ‘divine and natural
wisdom of the ancients’ which trumped all ‘paper erudition.’13 In the
seventeenth century the term was adopted by Protestant dissenters,
Christian kabbalists, and lay prophets like Heinrich Khunrath, Jacob
Böhme, Paul Nagel, Johann Valentin Andreae, and Abraham von
Franckenberg, to represent a prophetic alternative, sometimes
stridently anticlerical, to institutionalised religious, educational, and
political authority.14
Faivre has identified three characteristics common to most early
modern theosophical works. The first is speculation about the
complex interrelations between God, humanity, and nature. The
second is the primacy of the mythic and mytheme—like the story of
the Fall—as foundations for this speculation; and the third is the
belief that humanity, through creative imagination, can access higher
supernatural worlds.15 Although the canon of theosophical literature
has typically been limited to the works of a handful of well-known
figures—Faivre himself names but eight German representatives—
the reality is that the number of theosophers in early modern
Germany was large, and the diversity of their teachings remarkable.
Unmentioned by Faivre, Gifftheil was both a student and exponent of
this tradition. His earliest tracts were influenced by Paracelsian and
Arndtian thought, and featured sweeping speculations about the Fall,
about spiritual rebirth, and about the interconnectedness of the
created world. Even as Gifftheil’s writings in later years inclined to
more simplistic anti-war rebukes and apocalyptic tirades, his
worldview remained theosophical. Theosophy provides a key to
unlocking his approach to the world, how he understood its failings,
and how he conceived of his own prophetic calling as a remedy to
them.
Gifftheil’s place in this tradition is confirmed by his supporters,
who, to a man, were supporters or exponents of theosophia. They
included followers of Jacob Böhme, Arndtians, and Schwenckfelders.
After his death, Gifftheil’s mission was taken up by figures like
Friedrich Breckling, Johann Georg Gichtel, and Quirinus Kuhlmann,
all of whom were deeply indebted to theosophical doctrines. As
such, Gifftheil’s story sheds considerable light on German
theosophical currents in the crucial period between Jacob Böhme’s
death in 1624 and the rise of Pietism in the 1670s. It casts this
current in a new and sometimes disturbing light. For while in modern
scholarship theosophy is chiefly associated with a gentle
introspective pacifism, Gifftheil’s story shows that several adherents
flirted closely with militarism, and that the theosophical movement
as a whole was forced to navigate a potential martial turn in the
early 1640s.16
⋆⋆⋆
Traditionally, historians have struggled to make sense of Gifftheil.
This is unsurprising for, even in the digital age, evidence concerning
his life and work is difficult to identify and to access. Printed editions
of his many writings, distributed in limited numbers in ephemeral
formats, were and are rare. Given that virtually all were printed
anonymously or pseudonymously, they are all but unidentifiable in
library catalogues whether traditional or modern.17 Similarly, though
manuscript material concerning Gifftheil’s life and writings can be
found in numerous libraries and archives throughout Europe, they
are often incompletely catalogued, or only identifiable by dogged
research and good fortune.
The struggle for historians to find contexts for Gifftheil has
resulted in two distinct historiographical traditions concerning the
prophet. The first of these represents Gifftheil as a preternaturally
well-travelled and influential religious adventurer, typically described
as a pacifist, whose writings and agitations in England and
elsewhere were an inspiration for English Fifth Monarchism and
Quakerism.18 These remarkable claims, however, have their origins
not in statements made by any of the key figures, but are instead
repetitions and variations of the alarmist heresiographical ‘lumping’
undertaken by some of Gifftheil’s polemical detractors.19 Repeated
by multiple authorities, the prophet’s links to these movements have
assumed a patina of historical verity merely by dint of their
repetition. The result of the cross-pollination of Gifftheil’s obscurity
with associations inherited from early modern religious polemic is
nowhere better demonstrated than in the bizarre tale of Gifftheil’s
supposed audience with a sultan of the Ottoman Empire as a Quaker
missionary. As far as I can determine, this first appeared in a Dutch
scholarly work of 1902, which informed us that:
Gifftheil was so confident in his prophetic mission that he visited the Sultan.
The Sultan willingly listened to him, albeit with bemusement and good
humour, and, thanking him for his words, assured him in the manner of
Alexander’s testimony to Diogenes that he would be delighted to become a
Quaker, if he were not already a Muslim.20
Needless to say, this incident never occurred. While the prophet sent
at least one letter to ‘the Turks’ during his lifetime, the only other
indication that Gifftheil or his exhortations ever reached the Sublime
Porte comes, fittingly, in the pages of a 1691 novel.21 The story is
almost certainly the result of a confusion of Gifftheil with the Quaker
missionary Mary Fisher, who visited Sultan Mehmed IV at Adrianople
in 1658.22 Whether the interpolation of the German prophet into the
tale was the historian’s error, or appeared in an as-yet unidentified
anti-Quaker polemic of early modernity, is less important than the
circumstance that, although not corroborated by a skerrick of
primary evidence, it has been repeated several times, and its echoes
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
He watched, making certain of his plans, until the ship's ports closed.
Then he poised and made ready himself. Then from the ship's drivers
came that giveaway glare of violet-actinic light that seared the
eyeballs of he who looked. The ship trembled slightly, and lifted at 3-
Gs—its acceleration with respect to Mars was three Terran G minus
the surface gravity of the Red Planet. It went up, gaining speed. The
actinic glow increased as the distance from ground increased, and it
cast its glare over the entire spaceport.
Then, unseen against the glare—he was but a small mote against a
sea of blinding violet—Black Morgan took off.
A-space, the glare died out. It was an atmosphere-ionization, and by
the time there was no atmosphere, Black Morgan was safe.
At turnover, the ship was hailed, as before. Black Morgan entered the
ship as he had done many times, looted the passengers and the
vault, made mocking jokes, and left. The ship went on, its passengers
and crew cowed and beaten.
Black Morgan laughed uproariously.
Again!
He exulted, and feeling certain of his future, Black Morgan waited
patiently. An hour—two—and then he was off toward Terra, laughing
and plotting more piracy.
Then his alarm rang. Morgan blinked. A meteor—but no meteor ever
rang the drive detector. That took energy output!
Morgan snarled and looked out of his port.
And there he saw a sight that terrified him. Through his mind passed
the recollection of all the thousands that had seen a similar sight,
though the markings were different. Instead of the chromium and
black pirate craft, there rode a quiet Guardship, big and potent.
Morgan was outgunned, for three solid turrets of three rifles each
covered his smaller ship in an inevadable bracket of heavy fire.
Resistance was impossible; he could not even fight like a cornered
rat. He was forced, if anything, to suicide. Ignominious suicide, for
there would not even be the chance to go out fighting.
The space door opened to admit a single man, clad in the uniform of
the Solar Guard.
Morgan gulped and swore. "Jeffries!"
"Right," snapped the Guardsman.
Morgan grabbed for his guns and the cabin of the small craft was
filled with the crack-crack of swift gun fire. Morgan fired once; Jeffries
twice. Black Morgan missed, but Jeffries' first shot shattered the
pirate's right wrist. The other gun dropped out of his hand from shock,
and Jeffries strode up and covered the beaten pirate.
Jeffries did not return to his ship, but he took over the pirate's small
craft and drove it to Terra. He handed the pirate over to Captain
Edwards with a smile.
"This is he," he grunted. "And now what?"
"You've won," smiled Edwards. His pleasure was honest. "If he's
Black Morgan, you've won, and we can easily hush up any trouble.
But can you prove it?"
"Sure," grinned Jeffries. "Cell him, and then come up to training
school on the roof. This takes demonstration."
"O.K.," smiled Edwards. "It's your show."
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the
United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms
of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying,
performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this
work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes
no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in
any country other than the United States.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of
other ways including checks, online payments and credit card
donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.