Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full download Materials Science in Photocatalysis 1st Edition Elisa I. Garcia Lopez (Editor) file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download Materials Science in Photocatalysis 1st Edition Elisa I. Garcia Lopez (Editor) file pdf all chapter on 2024
https://ebookmass.com/product/nanostructured-materials-for-
visible-light-photocatalysis-micro-and-nano-technologies-1st-
edition-arpan-kumar-nayak-editor/
https://ebookmass.com/product/mossbauer-spectroscopy-
applications-in-chemistry-and-materials-science-yann-garcia/
https://ebookmass.com/product/epigenetics-in-precision-
medicine-1st-edition-jose-luis-garcia-gimenez/
https://ebookmass.com/product/concepts-of-materials-science-
sutton-frs/
Operator Theory by Example 1st Edition Stephan Ramon
Garcia
https://ebookmass.com/product/operator-theory-by-example-1st-
edition-stephan-ramon-garcia/
https://ebookmass.com/product/electronic-materials-principles-
and-applied-science-poplavko/
https://ebookmass.com/product/metaphysics-and-cognitive-science-
alvin-i-goldman/
https://ebookmass.com/product/dangerous-weapons-the-ruy-lopez-
cox/
https://ebookmass.com/product/foundations-of-materials-science-
and-engineering-7th-edition-william-fortune-smith/
Materials Science in Photocatalysis
Materials Science
in Photocatalysis
Edited by
Elisa I. Garcı́a-López
Professor, Department of Biological Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies
(STEBICEF), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
Leonardo Palmisano
“Schiavello-Grillone” Photocatalysis Group, Department of Engineering, University of Palermo,
Palermo, Italy
Elsevier
Radarweg 29, PO Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, Netherlands
The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, United Kingdom
50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or
mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without
permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to seek permission, further information about the
Publisher’s permissions policies and our arrangements with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance
Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency, can be found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions.
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the Publisher
(other than as may be noted herein).
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience broaden our
understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical treatment may become
necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating and using
any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such information or methods
they should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including parties for whom they have a
professional responsibility.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors, assume any liability
for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or
from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein.
Numbers in parentheses indicate the pages on which the authors’ University, Center for Membrane Technology, Aalborg,
contributions begin. Denmark
Zahra Abbasi (235), Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Vlasta Brezová (125), Institute of Physical Chemistry and
Science, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Chemical Physics, Faculty of Chemical and Food Tech-
Iran nology, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava,
Sambandam Anandan (283), Department of Chemistry, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
National Institute of Technology, Trichy, India Adele Brunetti (523), Institute on Membrane Technology
Masakazu Anpo (171), Department of Applied Chemistry, (ITM-CNR), National Research Council c/o The
Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka Prefecture Uni- University of Calabria, Rende CS, Italy
versity, Sakai, Osaka, Japan V. Capucci (649), IrisCeramica Group, Fiorano M.se, Italy
K Aswani Raj (505), Department of Chemistry, IIT Erik Cerrato (221), Department of Chemistry and NIS
Dharwad, Dharwad, Karnataka, India Centre, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
Ana Bahamonde (83), Environmental Catalystis Engi- G. Cerrato (649), Department of Chemistry, Università
neering Group, Institute of Catalysis and Petrochem- degli Studi di Torino, Torino, Italy
istry, Madrid, Spain Federico Cesano (385), Chemistry Department; NIS Inter-
F. Baldassarre (603), Biological and Environmental departmental Centre, Torino University, Torino, Italy
Sciences Department & UdR INSTM of Lecce, University G. Ciccarella (603), Biological and Environmental
of Salento; Institute of Nanotechnology, CNR Sciences Department & UdR INSTM of Lecce,
NANOTEC, National Research Council, Lecce, Italy University of Salento; Institute of Nanotechnology,
Giuseppe Barbieri (523), Department of Environmental CNR NANOTEC, National Research Council, Lecce,
and Chemical Engineering, The University of Calabria, Italy
Rende CS, Italy Juan C. Colmenares (575), Institute of Physical Chem-
Zuzana Barbieriková (125), Institute of Physical Chem- istry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
istry and Chemical Physics, Faculty of Chemical and Jose C. Conesa (267), Institute of Catalysis and Petrochem-
Food Technology, Slovak University of Technology istry, CSIC, Madrid, Spain
in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
Juan M. Coronado (139), Institute of Catalysis and Petro-
E. Bernardini (357), Chemistry Department, Torino chemistry, CSIC, Madrid, Spain
University, Torino, Italy
M. Covei (371), Center for Renewable Energy System and
C.L. Bianchi (649), Department of Chemistry, Università Recycling, Transilvania University of Brasov, Braşov,
degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy Romania
Vittorio Boffa (385), Aalborg University, Center for F. Deganello (357), Institute for the Study of Nanostruc-
Membrane Technology, Aalborg, Denmark tured Materials (ISMN)—Italian National Research
C. Bogatu (371), Center for Renewable Energy System and Council (CNR), Palermo, Italy
Recycling, Transilvania University of Brasov, Braşov, Francesco Di Franco (115), Dipartimento di Ingegneria,
Romania Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy
Fabrı́cio Eduardo Bortot Coelho (385), Chemistry R. Djellabi (649), Department of Chemistry, Università
Department, Torino University, Torino, Italy; Aalborg degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
xv
xvi Contributors
A. Duta (371), Center for Renewable Energy System and Cd. Universitaria, San Nicolás de los Garza, NL,
Recycling, Transilvania University of Brasov, Braşov, Mexico
Romania Sam Hseien-Y. Hsu (575), School of Energy and
Dana Dvoranová (125), Institute of Physical Chemistry Environment, Hong Kong, China
and Chemical Physics, Faculty of Chemical and Food Shin-Ting Hwang (283), Department of Environmental
Technology, Slovak University of Technology in Engineering and Science, Feng Chia University,
Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovak Republic Taichung, Taiwan
Gabriela Dyrda (183), Institute of Chemistry, University Ana Iglesias-Juez (139), Institute of Catalysis and Petro-
of Opole, Opole, Poland chemistry, CSIC, Madrid, Spain
Maya Endo-Kimura (421), Institute for Catalysis (ICAT), Lakshmanan Karuppasamy (283), Department of Envi-
Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan ronmental Engineering and Science, Feng Chia
D. Fabbri (357), Chemistry Department, Torino University, Taichung, Taiwan
University, Torino, Italy Marcin Kobielusz (95), Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian
Irina M. Factori (341), Human and Natural Sciences Center, University, Kraków, Poland
Federal University of ABC—UFABC, Santo Andre, SP, Ewa Kowalska (421), Institute for Catalysis (ICAT);
Brazil Graduate School of Environmental Science, Hokkaido
Marisol Faraldos (83), Environmental Catalystis Engi- University, Sapporo, Japan
neering Group, Institute of Catalysis and Petrochem- Anna Kubacka (409), Institute of Catalysis and Petro-
istry, Madrid, Spain chemistry, CSIC, Madrid, Spain
Junting Feng (485), State Key Laboratory of Chemical Joanna Kuncewicz (95), Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiel-
Resource Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical lonian University, Kraków, Poland
Technology, Beijing, China
Maria Kuznetsova (341), Human and Natural Sciences
Pablo S. Fernández (341), Chemistry Institute, State Center, Federal University of ABC—UFABC, Santo
University of Campinas—UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Andre, SP, Brazil
Brazil
Xianjun Lang (561), Sauvage Center for Molecular Sci-
Marcos Fernández-Garcı́a (409), Institute of Catalysis ences, College of Chemistry and Molecular Sciences,
and Petrochemistry, CSIC, Madrid, Spain Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
Belen Ferrer (543), Chemistry Department, Universitat Enzo Laurenti (589), Chemistry Department, Torino
Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain University, Torino, Italy
Paolo Fornasiero (485), Chemistry Department, INSTM
Xia Li (561), Sauvage Center for Molecular Sciences,
and ICCOM-CNR Trieste Research Unit, University
College of Chemistry and Molecular Sciences, Wuhan
of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
University, Wuhan, China
Fernando Fresno (139), Photoactivated Processes Unit,
Leonarda F. Liotta (13), Institute for the Study of Nano-
Institute IMDEA Energy, Madrid, Spain
structured Materials, Palermo, Italy
R. Galli (649), DiSTAS-Department for Sustainable Food
Wojciech Macyk (95), Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian
Process, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza,
University, Kraków, Poland
Italy
Giuliana Magnacca (357, 385, 589), Chemistry Department;
Hermenegildo Garcı́a (543), Instituto Universitario de
NIS Interdepartmental Centre, Torino University, Torino,
Tecnologı́a Quı́mica, CSIC-UPV, Universitat Poli-
Italy
tècnica de València, Valencia, Spain
Elisa I. Garcı́a-López (3, 13, 37, 235, 319), Department Giuseppe Marcı̀ (13, 37, 319), Department of Engineering,
University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences
and Technologies (STEBICEF), University of Palermo, Michele Mazzanti (301), Department of Chemical,
Palermo, Italy Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, University
of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
Dimitrios A. Giannakoudakis (575), Institute of Physical
Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Giuseppe Mele (183), Department of Engineering for
Poland Innovation, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy
D.B. Hernandez-Uresti (211), Autonomous University of Arianna Melillo (543), Chemistry Department, Universitat
Nuevo León, Physical-Mathematical Sciences Faculty, Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain
Contributors xvii
Marco Minella (449), Department of Chemistry and Ilenia Rossetti (63), Chemical Plants and Industrial Chem-
NIS—Nanostructured Interfaces and Surfaces Inte- istry Group, Department of Chemistry, Università degli
rdepartmental Centre, University of Turin, Turin, Studi di Milano and INSTM Unit Milano Università,
Italy Milan, Italy
Claudio Minero (449), Department of Chemistry and D. Sánchez-Martı́nez (211), Autonomous University of
NIS—Nanostructured Interfaces and Surfaces Interde- Nuevo León, Civil Engineering Faculty— Ecomaterials
partmental Centre, University of Turin, Turin, Italy and Energy Department, Cd. Universitaria, San Nicolás
Alessandra Molinari (301), Department of Chemical, de los Garza, NL, Mexico
Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, University Monica Santamaria (115), Dipartimento di Ingegneria,
of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy
Nikolaos G. Moustakas (255), Leibinz Institute for Patricia V.B. Santiago (341), Chemistry Institute, State
Catalysis (LIKAT), Rostock, Germany University of Campinas—UNICAMP, Campinas, SP,
Brazil
Vaishakh Nair (575), National Institute of Technology
Karnataka, Mangalore, India Rudolf Słota (183), Institute of Chemistry, University of
Opole, Opole, Poland
Sergio Navalón (543), Chemistry Department, Universitat
Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain Fabrizio Sordello (449), Department of Chemistry and
NIS—Nanostructured Interfaces and Surfaces Interde-
Bunsho Ohtani (159), Institute for Catalysis, Hokkaido
partmental Centre, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
University, Sapporo, Japan
Juliana S. Souza (341), Human and Natural Sciences
Sibila A.A. Oliveira (341), Human and Natural Sciences
Center, Federal University of ABC—UFABC, Santo
Center, Federal University of ABC—UFABC, Santo
Andre, SP, Brazil
Andre, SP, Brazil
G. Spigno (649), DiSTAS-Department for Sustainable
L. Operti (649), Department of Chemistry, Università degli
Food Process, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore,
Studi di Torino, Torino, Italy
Piacenza, Italy
Maria Cristina Paganini (221), Department of Chemistry
Taymaz Tabari (95), Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian
and NIS Centre, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
University, Kraków, Poland
L. Palmisano (3), Engineering Department, University of
Mai Takashima (159), Institute for Catalysis, Hokkaido
Palermo, Palermo, Italy
University, Sapporo, Japan
D. Perniu (371), Center for Renewable Energy System and
Masato Takeuchi (171), Department of Applied Chem-
Recycling, Transilvania University of Brasov, Braşov,
istry, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka Prefecture
Romania
University, Sakai, Osaka, Japan
Albin Pintar (397), Laboratory for Environmental Sci-
ences and Engineering, Department of Inorganic Chem- Maria Luisa Testa (589), Institute for the Study of Nano-
istry and Technology, National Institute of Chemistry, structured Materials, Italian National Research Council,
Ljubljana, Slovenia Palermo, Italy
Jovana R. Prekodravac (575), Vinca Institute of Nuclear Álvaro Tolosana-Moranchel (83), Nanotechnology and
Sciences—National Institute of the Republic of Integrated BioEngineering Centre, School of Engi-
Serbia, University of Belgrade Belgrade, Belgrade, neering, Ulster University, Belfast, Northern Ireland,
Serbia United Kingdom
Alessandra Bianco Prevot (357, 589), Chemistry Mateusz Trochowski (95), Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiel-
Department, Torino University, Torino, Italy lonian University, Kraków, Poland
Tharishinny Raja-Mogan (421), Institute for Catalysis Maria Laura Tummino (357, 589), Chemistry Department,
(ICAT); Graduate School of Environmental Science, Torino University, Torino, Italy
Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan Kunlei Wang (421), Institute for Catalysis (ICAT),
M Rajeswara Rao (505), Department of Chemistry, IIT Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan; Northwest Research
Dharwad, Dharwad, Karnataka, India Institute, Co. Ltd. of C.R.E.C., Lanzhou, P.R. China
Bárbara S. Rodrigues (341), Human and Natural Sciences Qian Wang (485), State Key Laboratory of Chemical
Center, Federal University of ABC—UFABC, Santo Resource Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical
Andre, SP, Brazil Technology, Beijing, China; Chemistry Department,
xviii Contributors
INSTM and ICCOM-CNR Trieste Research Unit, Uni- Gregor Žerjav (397), Laboratory for Environmental Sci-
versity of Trieste, Trieste, Italy ences and Engineering, Department of Inorganic Chem-
Zhishun Wei (421), School of Materials and Chemical Engi- istry and Technology, National Institute of Chemistry,
neering, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan, China Ljubljana, Slovenia
Jerry J. Wu (283), Department of Environmental Engineering Shuaizhi Zheng (421), Key Laboratory of Low Dimen-
and Science, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan sional Materials and Application Technology of Min-
istry of Education, School of Materials Science and
Andrea Zaffora (115), Dipartimento di Ingegneria, Uni- Engineering, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, China
versità degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy
Preface
Materials science has become an extremely broad and multidisciplinary field of research and the emerging technologies
where it is applied in the recent years have been astonishingly increasing. Photocatalysis, as a branch of catalysis, has been
one of these technologic fields, where the study of the materials science resulted particularly important. This book attempts
to cover the main aspects in the very broad field of materials science addressed to materials applied in heterogeneous photo-
catalytic process of various nature. A very wide class of photocatalytic materials have been treated here in an attempt of
cover both the main basic aspects to approach the study of photocatalytic materials and also examples of solid photoca-
talysts, their features and applications, without, of course, being exhaustive due to the plethora of materials and aspects
which would be treated in such an effort.
This book reports information on several types of materials used in heterogeneous photocatalysis both from a theoretical
and an applicative point of view. We hope that the 6 sections comprising 37 chapters will provide a fairly broad overview
for readers interested in this fascinating field of research. In addition to very popular bare and mixed metal oxides and
sulfides such as TiO2, ZnO, WO3, MoS2, other more complex and innovative materials are proposed such as metal-organic
structures, graphene and graphene oxide, magnetic materials, plasmonic nanoparticles, and 2D materials among others. The
reader will be able to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of using the various materials, taking into account not only
their cost but also their (photo)stability, toxicity, and ease of preparation. Moreover, readers can find in the book different
types of examples of photocatalytic reactions of oxidation and reduction carried out in liquid–solid and in gas–solid systems
where the different heterogeneous photocatalysts would be suitable. The various materials presented have been tested,
among other reactions, for pollutants degradation, chemical transformations including CO2 activation, organic synthesis
and applications of biomimetic photocatalytic systems, fungal abatement in photocatalytic surfaces. We would like to
underline that the authors have tried to deal with the topics so that the reader who wishes to deepen them can find the
necessary literature among the numerous references cited in each chapter. We believe that a book that summarizes concepts
and topics from a certain field that can then be further explored in the scientific literature is particularly useful for young
researchers and PhD students, as well as for experienced researchers who are about to start research in that field. Finally, we
want to thank all the colleagues and friends who enthusiastically joined us in writing the book, and a last but not least thanks
goes to Elsevier and the staff who accompanied us with great professionalism and patience during this rewarding adventure.
xix
Chapter 1
1 Introduction
The contemporary world is facing energy shortages and environmental problems, which hinder the evolution of human
civilization giving rise to various types of crises. The huge consumption of energy and environmental pollution from tra-
ditional industrial processes, along with the increasing need for synthetic chemicals to satisfy current requirements, are
urgent issues to be addressed for the development of new foundations for a sustainable future. These critical challenges
need solutions that require an important upgrade in energy sources and the conception of new generation processes and
manufacturing technologies. Researchers, over the past few decades, have been studying several methods to understand
how to overcome these problems. In this context, heterogeneous photocatalysis appears as one of the useful technologies
to help these urgent efforts, and it can contribute to managing the conversion of solar energy into chemical energy in a
sustainable way.
This introductory chapter discusses some essential characteristics of heterogeneous photocatalysis by making connec-
tions with thermal catalysis. We hope that their analysis together with the explanation of some key concepts leads to better
understanding the contents of the chapters in this book. In particular, the chapter highlights the importance of the features
and parameters of solid photocatalysts.
production of hydrogen, the performing of green organic syntheses, and the reduction of carbon dioxide are among some of
the potential applications of heterogeneous photocatalysis.
In the 1990s, heterogeneous photocatalysis was considered among the “advanced oxidation technologies” and was
mainly applied to the degradation of very toxic and nonbiodegradable species both in the vapor and liquid phase [11–13].
However, more recently photocatalytic reactions have been directed toward the formation of compounds with high added
value under mild experimental conditions, although in water, the green solvent par excellence, it is difficult to obtain high
selectivity and the solubility of most organic molecules is low [14]. After the document by Fujishima and Honda, a great
number of articles have been published concerning the heterogeneous field of photocatalysis. In this situation, the proposals
of terms and definitions to correctly articulate the photocatalytic investigations seem to be important tools [15–18]. However,
a definitive “Glossary of terms used in photocatalysis and radiation catalysis” (IUPAC recommendations) was published with
a final agreement in 2011 [19], although it should be considered that the rapid evolution of science could suggest updates and
changes to terms and definitions found in that document. The definition of photocatalysis was accepted as the “change in the
rate of a chemical reaction or its initiation under the action of ultraviolet, visible, or infrared radiation in the presence of a
substance, the photocatalyst, that absorbs light and is involved in the chemical transformation of the reaction partners.” The
definition of photocatalyst was established as: “substance able to produce, by absorption of ultraviolet, visible, or infrared
radiation, chemical transformations of the reaction partners, repeatedly coming with them into intermediate chemical inter-
actions and regenerating its chemical composition after each cycle of such interactions.” This last definition was very much
related to that of the catalyst. Heterogeneous catalysts are solids or mixtures of solids that cause or accelerate a chemical
reaction without being modified. Heterogeneous catalysts can be metals, oxides, metal salts, sulfides, zeolites, and perov-
skites. Heterogeneous photocatalysts are solid semiconductors that act catalytically under light radiation.
In a heterogeneous photocatalytic process, the solid photocatalyst is excited by a light radiation with suitable energy. In
this process, an electron in the valence band (VB) of the semiconductor is excited by the photo-irradiation toward the empty
conduction band (CB) of the solid, which is separated by a band gap from the VB. The electron in the VB, being promoted,
leaves a positive hole in the VB. The photo-generated electrons and holes (e/h+) are responsible for the reduction and
oxidation reactions, respectively, occurring at the surface of the photocatalyst. Indeed, species adsorbed on the surface
of a photocatalyst would be either reduced or oxidized. The material is, in practice, a heterogeneous catalyst, albeit it
is active only when it absorbs photons with a suitable energy generating the (e/h+) couple. The photocatalyst, like the
catalyst, remains chemically unchanged during and after the reaction, and accelerates a chemical reaction participating
in the mechanism of the reaction but not in the overall chemical process.
A heterogeneous photocatalytic reaction can be followed, and its occurrence can be ascertained by (1) measuring the
consumption of the starting substrates, (2) determining the reaction products once the irradiation has started, and (3) ver-
ifying the actual role of the solid as a catalyst by checking if its properties have been modified during the photoreaction.
The relationship between photocatalysis and catalysis was addressed by Childs and Ollis, who questioned the actual
nature of the photocatalyst and how to correctly compare the activity of the different photocatalytic materials [20].
A catalytic reaction can be divided into the following steps: (1) diffusion of the reactants from the fluid phase to the
catalyst surface, (2) adsorption of the reagent(s), (3) reaction occurring in the adsorbed phase, (4) desorption of the product
(s), and (5) its (their) transfer to the bulk of the fluid phase [21]. The steps that should be considered in a heterogeneous
photocatalytic process are similar, but (2) and (3) seem quite different from those expected in thermal catalysis. This is
because in a photocatalytic process the reactants are generally only physically adsorbed on the surface because the reaction
is carried out at low temperature. After adsorption, several reactions and physical processes activated by light occur,
including possible photo-adsorption and photo-desorption stages. On the contrary, in a catalytic process the adsorption
can itself be considered a thermally activated chemical reaction, and it generally involves a chemisorption where at least
one reactant is destabilized and gives rise to the desired product(s) [22].
Heating is not necessary for the photonic activation of a solid photocatalyst, but it is required in catalysis to activate the
chemisorption of the reactant on the surface of the catalyst, its transformation, and its subsequent desorption.
The main difference between a catalyst and a photocatalyst is that in thermal heterogeneous catalysis the solid is ready
to perform its function, while in photocatalysis it must be “activated” by light generating hole-electron pairs before being
considered a photocatalyst. Furthermore, the activity of the photocatalyst is maintained only by the continuous absorption
of light.
It is worth noting here that the photo-adsorption is a process due to the light absorption by the solid surface according to
the following mechanism [23]:
S + hn ! S∗ (1)
Fundamentals of photocatalysis Chapter 1 5
S∗ ! S (2)
S∗ + R ! Rads (3)
where S is the photo-adsorption center onto the photocatalytic surface, S* is the active state of the photo-adsorption center,
R is the reactant molecule in the fluid phase, and Rads is the photo-adsorbed substrate onto the active site of the solid
photocatalyst.
The physical steps reported in (1)–(3) represent the initial steps in a catalytic photo-assisted reaction, that is, the radi-
ation absorption by the solid photocatalyst (1) and (2) and the successive adsorption of the substrate (3). The irradiation of
the solid surface modifies the properties of the photocatalyst surface [24, 25]. One can mention, for example, the hydro-
philic/hydrophobic nature of the surface of the semiconductors, which become more hydrophilic (smaller contact angle)
when irradiated and gradually go back to a more hydrophobic state when left in the dark or exposed to visible light [26]. In
particular, modification of the properties of the surface is reversible and the surface returns to its original state in the
absence of irradiation.
After the activation of the photocatalyst due to absorption of light of suitable energy, the photocatalytic process takes
place in some pure physical or chemical stages. In fact, as described previously for the catalytic cycle, the reactant(s) must
reach the external surface of the photocatalyst, spread in the pores, photo-adsorb, and photoreact and therefore the product
(s) must be desorbed. The main stages occurring in a photocatalytic process on the “activated-by-light” semiconductor
particle surface are (1) the diffusion of reactant(s) to the photocatalyst surface through the boundary layer, (2) diffusion
of reactant(s) from the reacting system into the pores of the photocatalyst, (3) photo-adsorption of reactant(s) on the pore
surface, (4) photo-oxidation and photo-reduction reactions, (5) photo-desorption of the reaction product(s) from the pore
surface, (6) diffusion of the product(s) out of the pores, and (7) diffusion of the products(s) away from the surface of the
photocatalyst through the boundary layer.
The diffusion processes may be easily affected by modifying the fluid dynamics of the system, while adsorption and
desorption of the reagents inside of the pores and from the pores could be addressed by the textural properties of the solid
photocatalyst, mainly the size and shape of the pores.
The adsorption and desorption induced by light phenomena, whose extent depends on the type of species involved, are
difficult to be quantified. The measurements of light absorption by the solid photocatalyst in dark conditions are only indic-
ative of what would occur in the presence of light. This is an important issue for explaining the overall mechanism of a
photocatalytic reaction. In addition, photo-adsorption and photo-desorption effects overlap with the disappearance or the
appearance of the species due to the reaction steps, influencing their measured concentration values in the gaseous fluids or
in the bulk of the liquid. Consequently, it is difficult to evaluate the extent of physical adsorption under irradiation due to the
concurrent disappearance of reagent(s) during the photocatalytic reaction.
As reported in Fig. 1, the photocatalyst, in this scheme exemplified by a TiO2 particle, absorbs a photon generating an
electron/hole couple (step 1) that recombines (step 2) or gives rise to oxidation and reduction reactions (steps 3 and 4) on the
surface or very close to it. The reagent(s) present on the fluid can adsorb more or less strongly depending on their chemical-
physical properties in relation to the surface of the catalyst. The impinging light produces electron-hole pairs if the ther-
modynamics constraints are fulfilled. Holes can be trapped by donor species as water molecules forming hydroxyl radicals
(∙OH). Contemporaneously, electrons reduce acceptor molecules as O2, which also can produce hydroxyl or hydroperoxide
radicals. These oxidant species formed in both oxidant and reductive paths attack generally unselectively the reagent(s)
Ox
6 1
e- 4
Ti
Red 1
2 1
Ti Ox 2
CO2 + H2O
5
h+ 3
HO 7
Red 2
FIG. 1 Steps of heterogeneous photocatalysis in a TiO2 particle. (Adapted from C.B. Mendive, D. Hansmann, T. Bredow, D. Bahnemann, New Insights
into the mechanism of TiO2 photocatalysis: thermal processes beyond the electron–hole creation, J. Phys. Chem. C 115 (2011), 19676, with permission of
the American Chemical Society.)
6 SECTION A Introduction
transforming it into intermediates and into the final products by means of various consecutive steps, which are resumed in
step 5. The surface of the photocatalyst itself can trap electrons and holes, and Ti(IV) and/or Ti-OH sites, for instance in the
case of TiO2 surface, can respectively play this role (steps 6 and 7).
The features of a good photocatalyst include chemical and biological inertness, stability toward light irradiation
(absence of photo-corrosion), easy and cheap production, and being harmless to the environment and living beings.
The most attractive photocatalyst should be activated by natural solar light. Among all the semiconductors tested, the most
popular has been TiO2. The majority of photocatalysts are inorganic solid materials, generally oxides that exist in various
crystalline phases. Nevertheless, sulfides, metal salts, zeolites, and perovskites have also been used. More recently, some
organic semiconductors such as boron nitride (BN) or carbon nitride solid (C3N4) have been studied as well. The subsequent
chapters propose a wide range of examples.
A heterogeneous photocatalyst should be a semiconductor possessing a crystalline structure. The absence of crystal-
linity prevents the solid to be used as photocatalyst. Indeed, only a crystalline semiconductor may absorb radiation of
suitable energy (equal to or greater than the bandgap) generating efficient electron-hole pairs. The light absorption and
the formation of photoproduced couples only occur in the spatially ordered atoms of a crystal, in which the radiation
can enter in resonance. Amorphous phases absorb radiation, but the separation of electrons and holes that are responsible
for surface redox processes is impossible. The crystalline morphology of the photocatalyst significantly influences the
optical, chemical, and topographical characteristics of its surface, and consequently its activity. The ability to guarantee
an optimization of these factors is the key to obtaining highly performing photocatalysts [27].
An interesting further aspect has been highlighted by some authors who report that 3D networks can be formed by some
nanoparticles of metal oxides, which can work as photocatalysts. In the 3D network the particles are not ordered randomly,
but their atomic planes are aligned in a precise way so that their contact can allow the transfer of the e/h+ pairs, reducing
greatly the interfacial trapping processes. This effect is called “antenna effect” [28].
Electrons and gaps can move to/on the surface and be trapped. The presence of a “cooperative network” in place of
individual photocatalyst particles improves the photocatalytic activity of the entire system.
Many reactions can be performed both catalytically and photocatalytically, but the two mechanisms are generally dif-
ferent [2, 13, 29]. The catalytic and photocatalytic processes can also occur simultaneously [30].
We have seen that the photocatalyst should (photo)adsorb two types of reactants, one to be oxidized and the other to be
reduced, in order to assure the electroneutrality of the photocatalytic cycle. A photocatalytic reaction can produce partial
and total oxidation reactions or give rise to a synthesis, depending on the negative or positive sign, respectively, of the
variation of Gibbs free energy (DG) of the reaction.
The photoinduced electron-hole carriers’ mobility, to react with the species adsorbed on the solid photocatalyst surface,
mainly depends on two factors: the band energy positions of the semiconductor and the redox potential of the adsorbates.
The higher energy level of the valence band (HOMO) determines the hole-oxidizing ability, whereas the lower energy level
of the conduction band (LUMO) stands for the electron reduction potential. These two values measure the possibility of the
photocatalyst to promote oxidations and reductions, respectively. An oxidation reaction is more favored the more positive
the position of the VB, while a reduction reaction is more favored the more negative the position of the CB. In Fig. 2 the
band positions for some semiconductors used often in heterogeneous photocatalysis are reported together with the reduction
potentials of H2O to O2 and H+ to H2.
From a thermodynamic point of view, the reduction of the oxidized species of an adsorbed couple whose redox potential
is more positive than the flat band potential of the CB is allowed, whereas the reduced species of a couple whose redox
potential is more negative than the flat band potential of the VB can be oxidized. Fig. 2 depicts this situation, where three
families of photocatalysts are illustrated in red, blue, and green. The red group includes those semiconductors possessing a
very oxidant VB, and thus in the aqueous suspension they assure the formation of holes and therefore OH radicals (also
O2 ∙ and H2O2), which induce oxidation reactions. The formation of OH radicals occurs because the potential of the VB is
more positive than that of the OH radical formation (see Fig. 2). The green group includes those photocatalysts with more
negative CB positions; the photo-generated electrons produced under illumination of these materials have a strong
reduction ability, and H2 evolution from H2O and/or CO2 reduction are possible. In other words, they can photo-reduce
CO2 and give rise to water photo-splitting from a thermodynamic point of view. It should be remembered, however, that
the actual occurrence of these mentioned processes is connected to many factors that influence the theoretical thermody-
namic values shown in Fig. 2. For example, the presence of interband states between VBs and CBs hinders the photoca-
talytic reaction because these states favor electron-hole recombination; the lifetime of the photo-produced pairs decreases,
preventing them from reaching the surface of the photocatalyst where the redox reaction takes place.
From a kinetic point of view, the efficiency of the photocatalyst is maximum when the rate of the e/h+ deactivation
process (i.e., their recombination in the bulk or on the surface) is lower than that of these photo-produced pairs with the
adsorbed substrates.
The chemical reaction, involving the photo-adsorbed substrates is the most important step. As mentioned, heteroge-
neous photocatalysis can drive thermodynamically uphill reactions, for example, the splitting of water and reduction of
CO2. Notably, differently to what occurs in catalysis, a photocatalytic process can come about also for reactions with
DG > 0 that, under catalytic conditions, cannot occur to a significant extent unless energy is supplied. In the case of photo-
catalytic reactions, this energy is provided in the form of photons, as in the case of natural photosynthesis driven by sunlight.
As mentioned, the efficiency of a heterogeneous photocatalytic reaction depends on many chemical and physical prop-
erties of the photocatalyst, for example, the presence of acid and basic sites, zero charge point, hydroxylation degree of the
surface, specific surface area, shape and size of the particles, crystallinity, and porosity. An optimal combination of dif-
ferent properties such as activity, selectivity toward products with high added value, preparation with a nonpolluting
method and ease of regeneration, long lifetime, nontoxicity, and low cost is also important. The relative weight of these
properties is different, depending on the type of photocatalytic reaction to be performed and on the system (gas-solid or
liquid-solid), photoreactor, and set-up chosen. Also, when designing a photocatalyst it may be necessary to find a com-
promise between the different properties. The different synthetic methods could concern some properties compared to
others, thus favoring the required performances.
It could be useful to remind here the most significant parameters used to assess the performance of a heterogeneous
photocatalytic system, as defined by IUPAC [19]. All of them depend on the characteristics of the photocatalyst together
with those of the set-up system used. Four parameters can be defined: quantum yield (F), photonic efficiency (x), turnover
frequency (TOF), and turnover number (TON) [19].
The F is calculated as the number of product species formed in a photocatalytic process or, alternatively, the number of
molecules of a reacted reagent (defined events, according to IUPAC), divided by the number of photons at a certain wave-
length, absorbed by the system. This quantity has a well-quantified value only when the reaction conditions are also estab-
lished, and it is necessary to know the quantity of photons absorbed by the solid photocatalyst. To simplify the
quantification of the parameter, we can only consider the impinging radiation on the system before absorption. The x
is commonly used in heterogeneous photocatalysis instead of F. Its definition is similar to that of F, but a specified wave-
length range is considered instead of a certain wavelength. The TOF is the number of photoinduced transformations
(product formed or reactant consumed), per catalytic site and per period of time. In heterogeneous photocatalysis, the
number of active sites on the surface of the photocatalyst is often unknown, and the TOF value is determined by considering
the surface area, although the comparison of the obtained values for photocatalysts prepared by using different methods is
questionable.
The TON is the number of times that the photochemical transformation goes through a photocatalytic cycle. This
parameter is widely used in catalysis, but is quite descriptive for a photocatalytic process because the irradiation conditions
influence the reaction rate and, for the reaction to occur, incident photons of adequate energy must be absorbed by the
semiconductor, which usually consists of polycrystalline porous nanoparticles. Therefore, it is necessary to carefully
measure the extent of the absorption of photons [31]. An open debate on the experimental methodologies that should
be used to obtain these parameters is still ongoing [32].
Determination of the kinetics in photocatalytic reactions also requires careful determination of the radiation intensity
field within the reactor. In fact, it has been experimentally confirmed that the intensity of light determines the reaction rate
8 SECTION A Introduction
[33] because the absorption of the photons by the photocatalyst is, as previously mentioned, the main stage in a photoca-
talytic process. In this context, it can be emphasized that the results of photo-reactivity depend not only on the geometry and
size of the reactor but also on some characteristics of the photocatalyst such as particle size, morphology, and illumination
modes [34].
Since photocatalytic reactions occur on the surface [35], the driving forces are expressed on the basis of (1) the surface
concentration of the charge carriers, which are a function of the absorbed light and (2) the surface concentration of the
species to be oxidized and reduced.
The dependence of the reaction rate, r, on the intensity of light can be represented with a power law. For low light
intensity, the dependence of the rate on the photon flow is linear. This confirms the photo-induced nature of the activation
of the catalytic process, with the participation of photo-induced electric e/h+ charges in the reaction mechanism. However,
above a certain value (ca. 250 W/m2) the reaction rate becomes proportional to the square root because the formation rate of
the e/h+ pairs exceed the reaction rate, and their recombination is favored. The optimal use of light power corresponds to the
domain in which r is proportional to the radiant flux [36].
Generally, the initial reaction rate, r0, increases with the concentration of the substrate and the kinetics can be considered
pseudo-first order, tending to the limit value of order zero [36, 37]. This behavior can be interpreted by the Langmuir-
Hinshelwood (LH) model considering that the species to be reduced and oxidized are adsorbed on the surface of the
photocatalyst at different sites. Notably, other models in addition to the LH one have been used to study the kinetics of
the photocatalytic reactions, but it is not aim of this chapter to present them.
The LH model, according to which the reaction must involve surface sites induced by light absorption and by the
presence of photo-adsorbed species, contemplates two essential parameters: the surface kinetic constant and the equi-
librium adsorption constant, which refers to photo-adsorption/photo-desorption equilibrium phenomena. It is important
to underline that both of these may be determined by the fitting applied to photo-reactivity data [38, 39] and depend
on the local radiation intensity and on the characteristics of the photocatalyst.
The high-performance applications of the photocatalytic reaction are linked to the possibility that the photocatalyst is
made up of several crystalline phases of the same compound or that it is a composite made up of different materials whose
contact creates a heterojunction, which plays a key role by improving the separation of the photoproduced pairs increasing
their lifetime. In that case it is even more difficult than in the case of a single catalyst to rationalize the phenomena of photo-
adsorption/photo-desorption, due to the presence of different types of surfaces with different features. Notably, the size of
the crystallites, the specific surface area, and the porosity are crucial parameters to guarantee good accessibility to the
species to be adsorbed and reacted on the surface; in particular, the high-surface materials provide a great interface for
any type of photocatalytic reaction with high-performance applications.
3 Conclusions
Heterogeneous photocatalysis has emerged as a technology that can help solve some urgent energy and environmental
problems. This chapter discussed how the choice of materials generally used as catalysts can influence the efficiency
of photocatalytic reactions; more details can be found by reading the various chapters of this book. Among the main advan-
tages of a photocatalytic process are the mild experimental conditions in which the reactions are carried out, often at atmo-
spheric pressure and at room temperature using cheap and nontoxic solid photocatalysts, and the potential exploitation of
sunlight. The main parameters that influence the photocatalytic performance are in close relationship with the character-
istics of the material used as a photocatalyst. An accessible interface with the appropriate functionality plays a vital role in
the whole process. Many materials have traditionally been used as heterogeneous photocatalysts, such as bare and loaded/
doped inorganic semiconductors, glasses, fabrics, polymers, and various types of composites that often include or are sup-
ported on stoichiometric and nonstoichiometric oxides. In addition, many new innovative strategies have been designed in
recent decades, as reported in the coming chapters of this book.
References
[1] J.M. Thomas, W.J. Thomas, Principles and Practice of Heterogeneous Catalysis, VCH Publishers Inc., New York, NY, USA, 1997.
[2] M. Schiavello (Ed.), Photocatalysis and Environment: Trends and Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1988.
[3] D.F. Ollis, H. El-Ekabi (Eds.), Photocatalytic Purification and Treatment of Water and Air, Elsevier, New York, NY, 1993.
[4] M. Schiavello (Ed.), Heterogeneous Photocatalysis, Wiley Series in Photoscience and Photoengineering, vol. 3, Wiley, Chichester, UK, 1997.
[5] L. Bruner, J. Kozak, Information on the photocatalysis I the light reaction in uranium salt plus oxalic acid mixtures, Z. Elktrochem. Angew. 17
(9) (1911) 354–360.
Fundamentals of photocatalysis Chapter 1 9
[6] E.C.C. Baly, I.M. Heilbron, W.F. Barker, Photocatalysis. Part I. The synthesis of formaldehyde and carbohydrates from carbon dioxide and water,
JCS Trans. 119 (1921) 1025–1035.
[7] W. Doerffler, K. Hauffe, Heterogeneous photocatalysis I. The influence of oxidizing and reducing gases on the electrical conductivity of dark and
illuminated zinc oxide surfaces, J. Catal. 3 (1964) 156–170.
[8] W. Doerffler, K. Hauffe, Heterogeneous photocatalysis II. The mechanism of the carbon monoxide oxidation at dark and illuminated zinc oxide
surfaces, J. Catal. 3 (1964) 171–178.
[9] T. Inoue, A. Fujishima, S. Konishi, K. Honda, Photoelectrocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide in aqueous suspensions of semiconductor powders,
Nature 277 (5698) (1979) 637–638.
[10] A. Fujishima, K. Honda, Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode, Nature 238 (1972) 37–38.
[11] G. Marcı̀, L. Palmisano (Eds.), Heterogeneous Photocatalysis, Relationships with Heterogeneous Catalysis and Perspectives, Elsevier, 2019, ISBN:
9780444640154.
[12] J.C. Colmenares, Y.-J. Xu (Eds.), Heterogeneous Photocatalysis: From Fundamentals to Green Applications, Springer, 2016, ISBN: 978-3-662-
48719-8.
[13] J. Chen, F. Qiu, W. Xu, S. Cao, H. Zhu, Recent progress in enhancing photocatalytic efficiency of TiO2-based materials, Appl. Catal. A. Gen. 495
(2015) 131.
[14] F. Parrino, M. Bellardita, E.I. Garcı́a-López, G. Marcı̀, V. Loddo, L. Palmisano, Heterogeneous photocatalysis for selective formation of high-value-
added molecules: some chemical and engineering aspects, ACS Catal. 8 (2018) 11191–11225.
[15] N. Serpone, A.V. Emeline, Suggested terms and definitions in photocatalysis and radiocatalysis, Int. J. Photoenergy 4 (2002) 92–131.
[16] V.N. Parmon, Photocatalysis as a phenomenon: aspects of terminology, Catal. Today 39 (1997) 137–144.
[17] S.E. Braslavsky, K.N. Houk, Glossary of terms used in photochemistry (IUPAC recommendations 1988), Pure Appl. Chem. 60 (1988) 1055–1106.
[18] J.W. Verhoeven, Glossary of terms used in photochemistry (IUPAC recommendations 1996), Pure Appl. Chem. 68 (1996) 2223–2286.
[19] S.E. Braslavsky, A.M. Braun, A.E. Cassano, A.V. Emeline, M.I. Litter, L. Palmisano, V.N. Parmon, N. Serpone, Glossary of terms used in photo-
catalysis and radiation catalysis (IUPAC recommendations 2011), Pure Appl. Chem. 83 (2011) 931–1014.
[20] L.P. Childs, D.F. Ollis, Is photocatalysis catalytic? J. Catal. 66 (1980) 383–390.
[21] M. Thomas, W.J. Thomas, Principles and Practice of Heterogeneous Catalysis, Wiley, 1996.
[22] L. Palmisano, E.I. Garcı́a-López, G. Marcı̀, Inorganic materials acting as heterogeneous photocatalysts and catalysts in the same reactions, Dalton
Trans. 45 (2016) 11596–11605.
[23] N. Serpone, A.V. Emeline, Suggested terms and definitions in photocatalysis and radiocatalysis, Int. J. Photoenergy 4 (2002) 91–131.
[24] G. Munuera, V. Rives Arnau, A. Sauceso, Photo-adsorption and photo-desorption of oxygen on highly hydroxylated TiO2 surfaces. 1. Role of
hydroxyl-groups in photo-adsorption, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 75 (1979) 736–747.
[25] R.F. Howe, M. Gratzel, Electron-paramagnetic study of hydrated anatase under UV irradiation, J. Phys. Chem. 91 (1987) 3906–3909.
[26] A. Fujishima, T.N. Rao, D.A. Tryk, Titanium dioxide photocatalysis, J. Photochem. Photobiol. C 1 (2000) 1–21.
[27] C.B. Mendive, D. Hansmann, T. Bredow, D. Bahnemann, New insights into the mechanism of TiO2 photocatalysis: thermal processes beyond the
electron–hole creation, J. Phys. Chem. C 115 (2011) 19676.
[28] C.Y. Wang, C. Bttcher, D.W. Bahnemann, J.K. Dohrmann, A comparative study of nanometer sized Fe (III)-doped TiO2 photocatalysts: synthesis,
characterization and activity, J. Mater. Chem. 13 (2003) 2322.
[29] S. Dong, J. Feng, M. Fan, Y. Pi, L. Hu, X. Han, M. Liu, J. Sun, J. Sun, Recent developments in heterogeneous photocatalytic water treatment using
visible light-responsive photocatalysts: a review, RSC Adv. 5 (2015) 14610.
[30] E.I. Garcı́a-López, G. Marcı̀, F.R. Pomilla, L. Palmisano, Enhanced (photo)catalytic activity of Wells-Dawson (H6P2W18O62) in comparison to
Keggin (H3PW12O40) heteropolyacids for 2-propanol dehydration in gas-solid regime, Appl. Catal. A. Gen. 528 (2016) 113–122.
[31] M.D. Ballari, M.L. Satuf, O.M. Alfano, Photocatalytic reactor modeling: application to advanced oxidation processes for chemical pollution
abatement, Top. Curr. Chem. (Cham.) 377 (2019) 22.
[32] V. Augugliaro, M. Schiavello, L. Palmisano, Rate of photon absorption and turnover number: two parameters for the comparison of heterogeneous
photocatalytic systems in a quantitative way, Coord. Chem. Rev. 125 (1993) 173–182.
[33] C.S. Turchi, D.F. Ollis, Photocatalytic degradation of organic water contaminants: mechanisms involving hydroxyl radical attack, J. Catal. 122
(1990) 178–192.
[34] R.J. Brandi, C.A. Martin, O.M. Alfano, A.E. Cassano, A laboratory reactor for photocatalytic studies in slurry operation, J. Adv. Oxid. Technol. 5
(2002) 175–185.
[35] C. Minero, F. Catozzo, E. Pelizzetti, Role of adsorption in photocatalyzed reactions of organic molecules in aqueous titania suspensions, Langmuir 8
(1992) 481–486.
[36] J.M. Herrmann, Heterogeneous photocatalysis: an emerging discipline involving multiphase systems, Catal. Today 24 (1995) 157–164.
[37] V. Augugliaro, E. Garcı́a-López, V. Loddo, S. Malato-Rodrı́guez, I. Maldonado, G. Marcı̀, R. Molinari, L. Palmisano, Degradation of lincomycin in
aqueous medium: coupling of solar photocatalysis and membrane separation, Sol. Energy 79 (2005) 402–408.
[38] M. Addamo, V. Augugliaro, A. Di Paola, E. Garcı́a-López, V. Loddo, G. Marcı̀, L. Palmisano, Removal of drugs in aqueous systems by photoassisted
degradation, J. Appl. Electrochem. 35 (2005) 765–774.
[39] M. Addamo, V. Augugliaro, E. Garcı́a-López, V. Loddo, G. Marcı̀, L. Palmisano, Oxidation of oxalate ion in aqueous suspensions of TiO2 by photo-
catalysis and ozonation, Catal. Today 107–108 (2005) 612–618.
Chapter 2
1 Introduction
The increasing energy demand caused by population growth, the extensive utilization of fossil fuels, and the fast devel-
opment of industry have resulted in a serious energy crisis and have caused massive environmental pollution. Photocata-
lysis is considered one of the most potent techniques to solve energy and environmental issues by the use of abundant,
omnipresent, and free solar irradiation. Heterogeneous photocatalysts allow light energy to be transformed into chemical
energy useful for environmental remediation processes or energy production. The essence of the heterogeneous photoca-
talytic process is the solid photocatalyst. Many inorganic semiconductors have been widely investigated as photocatalysts.
From already 40 years, by the understanding of the photocatalytic processes, many kinds of photocatalysts have been
studied among them TiO2 soon emerged as one of the most interesting, along with other metal oxides and sulfides. Several
alternative materials as nitrides, phosphates, non-metal and organic photocatalysts as this book will present in the fol-
lowing, have been developed. An enormous variety of chemicals have been used for the preparation of these and other
(photo)catalysts and forsooth, photocatalytic materials can be prepared by many different routes, also because a plethora
of solids can be conceived as photocatalysts, as exemplified in this text itself. Indeed, in the following chapters, a profusion
of materials will be described as valid photocatalysts for a variety of applications.
In the wide scenario of the preparation of (photo)catalysts, some general elementary steps should be always accom-
plished. According to Hutchings and Vedrine, these operations are based on two fundamentals: (a) a detailed knowledge
of the scientific laws governing chemical and physical transformations, which are based on the fundamentals of inorganic
and/or solid-state chemistry, and (b) the empirical observation related to the carefully preserved know-how [1]. Many
industries are highly secretive concerning the preparation methodologies conceived for the materials to be used as
(photo)catalysts because they can be subjected to patents and this could be one reason for a certain paucity in affording
definitive and general studies in the field. This perception has been in part eradicated under the several scientific publi-
cations devoted to the field. Detailed preparation studies have been undertaken to establish general rules related to the
(photo)catalytic reaction to be attained. Many preparation methods are disclosed in the patent literature, and also frequently
are difficult to replicate for the lack of details in the methodologies or because of differences in the purity of reagents.
The efficiency of heterogeneous photocatalysts is determined by many chemical and physical features: i.e., the nature of
the material, shape of the particles, crystallinity degree, crystallite size point of zero charge, acidic and basic centers onto
the surface, specific surface area, and porosity, the surface-to-volume ratio among others. Specifically, a photocatalyst is a
semiconductor and among the above-mentioned parameters that influence semiconductor efficiency, in addition to the ther-
modynamic and kinetic constraints of the light-related processes, those playing a major role are crystallinity and surface
area. Crystallinity determines the charge separation/recombination rate and charge mobility, while high surface area is
necessary for efficient interfacial charge transfer processes beyond the particle domain. The surface area is an essential
requirement as long as reactants should be accessible to a maximum number of active sites. However, it is worth mentioning
that a very high SSA could lead to non-selective heterogeneous (photo)catalysts because, for instance, this material would
be easily able to over-oxidize the desired product. On the contrary, in an alternative reaction, the optimum (photo)catalyst
would require a high surface area. Consequently, we need to consider the optimum texture required for the solid by taking
into account the reaction that will be carried out.
Moreover, other important features to consider in the designing of a (photo)catalyst is to possess the appropriate texture
attrition resistance, adequate shape, and texture for the application and suitable pore structure.
Generally speaking, all of the physico-chemical features of the photocatalytic material would be combined to obtain an
efficient catalyst possessing the optimum combination to obtain the better activity and selectivity, to be easily regenerated,
durable, nontoxic, economic, and sustainable in terms of preparation methodology and lifetime. Often all the requirements
appear to contrast and the best compromise must be fulfilled during the photocatalyst conception and attainment. For this
aim, different preparation methodologies and techniques allow addressing the required performances.
There are many methods of nanostructures preparation, which can be divided into two approaches: “top-down” and
“bottom-up” methods [2]. The first one is based on the splitting of the bulk, macroscopic materials to nanoparticles. Crum-
bling, ball milling, and different kinds of lithography are “top-down” methodologies. Much better results, giving materials
with fewer defects and narrower size/shape distribution of grains provide the “bottom-up” methodologies, based on nano-
crystallites growth by the formation of nanostructures “atom by atom.” This self-assembling process gives rise to the aggre-
gation until the obtaining of nanoparticles. The “bottom-up” approaches are based mainly on chemical synthesis as, for
example, precipitation, decomposition of organic precursors, synthesis under hydrothermal conditions, hydrolysis and sub-
sequent condensation of reactants, surface redox exchange but also physical procedures as sputtering in a vacuum, con-
densation in liquid or gaseous phase among others.
A scheme of “bottom-up” and “top-down” approaches to obtain photocatalytic nanoparticles is reported in Fig. 1.
The development of new fabrication and processing technologies, along with a fundamental understanding of the rela-
tionship between the structure and properties of the powders continuously generates a variety of possibilities to produce
photocatalysts not only as powders but also as films, composites, and coatings.
The preparation methodologies of (photo)catalysts would be divided into two groups: (i) chemical and (ii) physical
methods, as schematized in Fig. 1. The strategies of the physical methods are based on a top to down approach, starting
from a bulk material that generates the final (photo)catalyst. Conversely, chemical methodologies are bottom-up
approaches, aiming to assemble molecules to form a final solid, showing the advantage of tailoring the solid to address
the suitable size, composition, and structure, appropriate for the target application. Moreover, chemical methods require
low temperatures and less energy than the physical procedures resulting in more economical and sustainable [2].
In this chapter, we will discuss some general principles concerning the methods for the preparation of heterogeneous
photocatalysts utilizing the chemical methodologies reported in Fig. 2.
A survey of the main chemical approaches for the preparation of (photo)catalysts will be reported in the following
paragraphs, along with some brief examples of photocatalysts prepared according to the described methodology.
Assembly from
Atoms/Molecules
Size Reduction
to nano-scale
for Assembly
TOP-DOWN BOTTOM-UP
FIG. 1 Scheme of two approaches to obtain nanoparticles that could be used as photocatalysts.
Preparation of photocatalysts by chemical methodologies Chapter 2 15
Pyrolysis
Precipitation/co-precipitation
Sputtering
Sol-gel
Ball-milling
Laser ablation Hydrothermal/Solvothermal
Electron-beam evaporation Microemulsion
Electrospraying Solid-state reactions
Electrochemical Solution combustion synthesis
Microwaves/Electromagnetic field
The main objective in the preparation of a photocatalyst is to produce (and be able to reproduce) a solid which can be
used as a stable, active, and selective catalyst offering high surface area, good porosity, and suitable mechanical strength.
The properties of a good catalyst, extended to the good photocatalysts is divided into two categories: (1) properties
which determine directly catalytic activity and selectivity, such as bulk and surface chemical composition, local micro-
structure, and phase composition; and (2) properties which ensure their successful implementation in the catalytic process,
as mechanical stability, porosity, shape, and size of catalyst particles. These needs generally require a compromise to
produce a material that meets the contradictory demands imposed by industrial processes. We will focus in this chapter
on the first category.
Classically, three types of catalyst, and hence photocatalysts, can be distinguished: (i) bulk catalysts; (ii) impregnated
catalysts; (iii) mixed-agglomerated powders.
Bulk catalysts are the most classical solids used as photocatalysts; supports are prepared by similar procedures. Impreg-
nated catalysts are usually obtained from preformed supports by impregnation with the active phase. Various substrates
have been used as heterogeneous supports including oxides, glass, fabric, or polymers. The mixed-agglomerated catalysts
comprise those materials obtained by mixing the active substances with powdered support or a support precursor and then
agglomerating the mixture [3].
In this scenario, two general strategies will be discussed in this Chapter, i.e., precipitation and impregnation. These can
be divided into various categories that will be described in the following. We will illustrate the main operations to obtain
bulk solids to use as photocatalysts and also as supports, then we will consider the preparation of supported catalysts.
The main unit operations applied for the preparation of (photo)catalysts involve the following procedures: (i) A pre-
cipitation step or an alternative process to obtain a solid (sol–gel, hydrothermal, solid–solid reaction, among others);
(ii) filtration, (iii) washing; (iv) grinding and (v) calcination. The scheme reported in Fig. 3 represents the steps that
could be followed. The preparation of a supporting material can foresee one or more further steps. Supported catalysts
are prepared for a large variety of reasons such as obtaining bifunctional catalysts, improve some features as the dis-
persion of the active phase, mechanical resistance, or induced active phase-support interaction to further improve the
(photo)catalyst activity.
Precursor
Precipitation
(Sol-gel, hydrothermal, etc…)
Precipitate
Aging, wash, filtering
Aging,
sprydrying Filtered cake
Shaping Calcination
Calcination Shaping
FIG. 4 Supersaturation dependence on concentration, T, and pH. Adapted with permission from C. Perego, P. Villa, Catalyst preparation methods, Catal.
Today 34 (1997) 281–305. Copyright by Elsevier.
supersaturation, the system turns unstable and the precipitation of the solid occurs as a consequence of a small perturbation.
The solid then is formed by the nucleation of small elementary particles and their further agglomeration.
The formation of clusters, which spontaneously grow by the subsequent addition of monomers is the first stage of the
nucleation process. The clusters reaching a critical size continue to grow. These primary particles begin to form a shared
structure, the aggregates. The size of the crystals obtained depends on the ratio of the rate of nucleation to that of the crystal
growth. The greater this ratio is, the smaller will be the crystallites and vice versa. If the rate of nucleation is faster than the
rate of growth, numerous very small particles are formed and the obtained solid tend to be amorphous.
The most common catalysts and photocatalysts prepared by precipitation are oxides and salts. The precursors are mainly
metallic salts or hydroxides. The precursors are preferably chosen among salts possessing the metal cation accompanied by
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
hypochondriasis, intellectual feebleness, and insanity. Two forms of
hereditary alcoholism have been recognized: First, that in which the
disease or defect of the parent is transmitted to the offspring; and
second, that in which the disease or defect is not directly transmitted
to the offspring, but a morbid tendency which manifests itself in
diseases or defects of a different kind.49
49 1. Heredite de similitude, Alcoolisme hereditaire homotype; 2. Heredite de
transformation, Alcoolisme hereditaire heterotype.
IV. Dipsomania.
To sum up, the chief indications for treatment are complete isolation,
the withdrawal of alcohol, abundant, readily assimilable, nutritious
food, and control of the reflex excitability of the nervous system.
First, then, during the paroxysm the patient must be saved, in so far
as is possible, from the danger of injuring himself or others and from
squandering his property. If the excesses are of such a degree as to
render it practicable, the same treatment must be carried out as in
cases of acute alcoholic mania and delirium tremens—namely,
confinement in a suitable apartment under the care of an
experienced nurse and the control of the doctor. Unfortunately, this
plan is not always practicable in the early days of the outbreak. Here
tonics, coca, and repeated small doses of quinia and strychnia are of
advantage. Courses of arsenic at the conclusion of, and in the
intervals between, the paroxysms are of use, on account of the
excellent influence they exert on the general nutrition. These may be
advantageously alternated with iron, cod-liver oil, and the compound
syrup of the phosphates or of the hypophosphites. Hydrotherapy
may also be used with advantage, and the influences of a well-
regulated hydropathic establishment are much more favorable than
those of institutions specially devoted to the treatment of alcoholic
subjects. In the latter the moral atmosphere is apt to be bad; the
patients support each other, and too often conspire to obtain in
secret that which is denied them openly, or, if the discipline be too
strict for this, they sympathize with each other in their restraint, react
unfavorably upon each other in the matter of shame and loss of self-
respect, and plot together to secure their liberty.
Few dipsomaniacs in the earlier periods are proper subjects for
treatment in hospitals for the insane. If cerebral excitement or
sleeplessness persist after the paroxysms, chloral, paraldehyde, or
the bromides in large doses may be used to secure sleep. Various
combinations of the bromides are often of use where the single salts
fail. It must not be forgotten that during the paroxysm there is great
danger lest the patient do himself or others harm. When there are
indications of an impending attack, and during the period of
depression following the attacks, benefit is derived from the daily use
of bitter infusions. As a matter of fact, however, the management of
these cases is among the most unsatisfactory of medical
undertakings. The difficulty is increased by the latent character of the
mental disorder in the intervals between the attacks. Even when
such patients voluntarily enter hospitals for the insane, they cannot
be retained there sufficiently long to derive any permanent benefit.
What we want is, in the words of Clouston, “an island where whiskey
is unknown; guardianship, combined with authority, firmness,
attractiveness, and high, bracing moral tone; work in the open air, a
simple natural life, a return to mother Earth and to Nature, a diet of
fruits, vegetables, bread, milk, eggs, and fish, no opportunity for one
case to corrupt another, and suitable punishments and deprivations
for offences against the rules of life laid down. All these continued for
several years in each case, and the legal power to send patients to
this Utopia for as long a period as medical authority determines, with
or without their consent.”