Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full download An Introduction to quantum optics and quantum fluctuations First Edition. Edition Milonni file pdf all chapter on 2024
Full download An Introduction to quantum optics and quantum fluctuations First Edition. Edition Milonni file pdf all chapter on 2024
https://ebookmass.com/product/introduction-to-quantum-field-
theory-with-applications-to-quantum-gravity-1st-edition-iosif-l-
buchbinder/
https://ebookmass.com/product/categories-for-quantum-theory-an-
introduction-chris-heunen/
https://ebookmass.com/product/introduction-to-quantum-mechanics-
john-dirk-walecka/
https://ebookmass.com/product/quantum-communication-quantum-
networks-and-quantum-sensing-ivan-djordjevic/
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th
Anniversary Edition – Ebook PDF Version
https://ebookmass.com/product/quantum-computation-and-quantum-
information-10th-anniversary-edition-ebook-pdf-version/
https://ebookmass.com/product/ideas-of-quantum-chemistry-
volume-1-from-quantum-physics-to-chemistry-3rd-edition-lucjan-
piela/
https://ebookmass.com/product/consciousness-and-quantum-
mechanics-1st-edition-shan-gao-editor/
https://ebookmass.com/product/models-of-quantum-matter-a-first-
course-on-integrability-and-the-bethe-ansatz-first-edition-
edition-eckle/
https://ebookmass.com/product/quantum-like-networks-an-approach-
to-neural-behavior-through-their-mathematics-and-logic-1st-
edition-stephen-a-selesnick/
AN INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM OPTICS AND
QUANTUM FLUCTUATIONS
An Introduction to Quantum Optics and
Quantum Fluctuations
Peter W. Milonni
Los Alamos National Laboratory and University of Rochester
1
3
Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP,
United Kingdom
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship,
and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of
Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries
© Peter W. Milonni 2019
The moral rights of the author have been asserted
First Edition published in 2019
Impression: 1
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in
a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the
prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted
by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics
rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the
above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the
address above
You must not circulate this work in any other form
and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer
Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press
198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Data available
Library of Congress Control Number: 2018955000
ISBN 978–0–19–921561–4
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780199215614.001.0001
Printed and bound by
CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY
Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and
for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials
contained in any third party website referenced in this work.
To my mother, Antoinette Marie Milonni
and
The quantum theory of light and its fluctuations are applied in areas as diverse as
the conceptual foundations of quantum theory, nanotechnology, communications, and
gravitational wave detection. The primary purpose of this book is to introduce some of
the most basic theory for scientists who have studied quantum mechanics and classical
electrodynamics at a graduate or advanced undergraduate level. Perhaps it might also
offer some different perspectives and some material that are not presented in much detail
elsewhere.
Any book purporting to be a serious introduction to quantum optics and fluctua-
tions should include field quantization and some of its consequences. It is not so easy to
decide which other aspects of this broad field are most apt or instructive. I have for the
most part written about matters of fundamental and presumably long-lasting signifi-
cance. These include spontaneous emission and its role as a source of quantum noise;
field fluctuations and fluctuation-induced forces; fluctuation–dissipation relations; and
some distinctly quantum aspects of light. I have tried to focus on the essential physics,
and in calculations have favored the Heisenberg picture, as it often suggests interpre-
tations along classically familiar lines. Some historical notes that might be of interest
to some readers are included; these and other digressions appear in small type. Also
included are exercises for readers wishing to delve further into some of the material.
I am grateful to my longtime friends Paul R. Berman, Richard J. Cook, Joseph H.
Eberly, James D. Louck, and G. Jordan Maclay for discussions over many years about
much of the material in this book. Jordan read most of the book in its nearly final ver-
sion and made insightful comments and suggestions. Thanks also go to Sönke Adlung
and Harriet Konishi of Oxford University Press for their patience and encouragement.
Peter W. Milonni
Los Alamos, New Mexico
Contents
Equation (1.1.4) relates the integral of B around a loop C to the current I in C and
the flux of E through C; the first term expresses Oersted’s law (an electric current
can deflect a compass needle), while the second term corresponds to the displacement
current that Maxwell, relying on mechanical analogies, added to the current density J.
With this additional term (1.1.1) and (1.1.4), together with the identity ∇·(∇×B) = 0,
imply the continuity equation
∂ρ
∇·J+ = 0, (1.1.6)
∂t
which says, in particular, that electric charge is conserved. (The additional term also
implied wave equations for the electric and magnetic fields and therefore the possibility
of nearly instantaneous communication between any two points on Earth!) Maxwell’s
equations express all the laws of electromagnetism discovered experimentally by the
pioneers (Ampère, Cavendish, Coulomb, Faraday, Lenz, Oersted, etc.) in a wonderfully
compact form.
If the charge density ρ does not change with time, it follows that ∇ · J = 0 and,
from Maxwell’s equations, that the electric and magnetic fields do not change with
time and are uncoupled:
µ0 I 1 2I
B= = (1.1.9)
2π r 4πǫ0 c2 r
at a distance r from the wire and points in directions specified by the right-hand rule.1
It then follows from (1.1.5) that the (attractive) force f per unit length between two
long, parallel wires separated by a distance r and carrying currents I and I ′ is
µ0 II ′ 1 2II ′
f= = . (1.1.10)
2π r 4πǫ0 c2 r
Until recently this was used to define the ampere (A) as the current I = I ′ in two long
parallel wires that results in a force of 2 × 10−7 N/m when the wires are separated by
1 m. This definition of the ampere implied the definition µ0 = 4π × 10−7 Wb/A·m,
the weber (Wb) being the unit of magnetic flux. With this definition of the ampere,
1 The fact that a wire carrying an electric current generates what Faraday would later identify as
a magnetic field was discovered by Oersted. While lecturing to students in the spring of 1820, Oersted
noticed that when the circuit of a “voltaic pile” was closed, there was a deflection of the needle of
a magnetic compass that happened to be nearby. Ampère, at the time a mathematics professor in
Paris, performed and analyzed further experiments on the magnetic effects of electric currents.
Electric and Magnetic Fields 3
the coulomb (C) was defined as the charge transported in 1 s by a steady current of 1
A. Then, in the Coulomb law,
1 q1 q2
F2 = 3 r12 (1.1.11)
4πǫ0 r12
for the force on a point charge q2 due to a point charge q1 , with r12 the vector pointing
from q1 to q2 , ǫ0 is inferred from the defined values of µ0 and c: ǫ0 = 8.854 × 10−12
C2 /N·m2 , or 1/4πǫ0 = 8.9874 × 109 N·m2 /C2 .
In the revised International System of Units (SI), the ampere is defined, based on
a fixed value for the electron charge, as the current corresponding to 1/(1.602176634 ×
10−19 ) electrons per second. The free-space permittivity ǫ0 and permeability µ0 in the
revised system are experimentally determined rather than exactly defined quantities;
the relation ǫ0 µ0 = 1/c2 , with c defined as 299792458 m/s, remains exact.
Equation (1.1.11) implies that the Coulomb interaction energy of two equal charges
q separated by a distance r is
1 q2
U (r) = . (1.1.12)
4πǫ0 r
We can use this formula to make rough estimates of binding energies. Consider, for
example, the H+ 2 ion. The total energy is Etot = Enn + Een + Ekin , where Enn is the
proton–proton Coulomb energy, Een is the Coulomb interaction energy of the electron
with the two protons, and Ekin is the kinetic energy. According to the virial theorem
of classical mechanics, Etot = −Ekin , implying
1
Etot = (Enn + Een ). (1.1.13)
2
Enn = e2 /(4πǫ0 r), where e = 1.602 × 10−19 C and r ∼ = 0.106 nm is the internuclear
separation. A rough estimate of Een is obtained by assuming that the electron sits at
the midpoint between the two protons:
1 e2
Een ≈ − × 2 × 1 = −4Enn . (1.1.14)
4πǫ0 2r
Then,
3 1 e2
Etot = − × ≈ −20.4 eV. (1.1.15)
2 4πǫ0 r
Since the binding (ionization) energy of the hydrogen atom is 13.6 eV, the binding
energy of H+2 , defined as the binding energy between a hydrogen atom and a proton, is
estimated to be (20.4 - 13.6) eV = 6.8 eV. Quantum-mechanical calculations yield 2.7
eV for this binding energy. Chemical binding energies on the order of a few electron
volts are typical.
4 Elements of Classical Electrodynamics
Consider as another example the energy released in the fission of a U235 nucleus.
Since there are 92 protons, the Coulomb interaction energy of the protons is
1 (92e)2
U1 ≈ , (1.1.16)
4πǫ0 R
where R is the nuclear radius. If the nucleus is split in two, the volume decreases
be a factor of 2, and the radius therefore decreases to (1/2)1/3 R, since the volume is
proportional to the radius cubed. The sum of the Coulomb interaction energies of the
daughter nuclei is therefore
1
U2 ≈ 2 × × (46e)2 /[(1/2)1/3 R] = 0.63U1 . (1.1.17)
4πǫ0
The energy released in fission is Uf = U1 − U2 = 0.37U1 . Taking R = 10−14 m for the
nuclear radius, we obtain Uf = 4.8 × 108 eV = 480 MeV, compared with the actual
value of about 170 MeV per nucleus. Thus we obtain the correct order of magnitude
with only electrostatic interactions, without accounting for the strong force between
nucleons and without having to know that E = mc2 .2 The physical origin of the energy
released in this simple model is the Coulomb interaction of charged particles, just as in
a chemical combustion reaction. But the energy released in chemical reactions typically
amounts to just a few electron volts per atom; the enormously larger energy released
per nucleus in the fission of U235 is due to the small size of the nucleus compared with
an atom and to the large number of charges (protons) involved.
Fig. 1.1 A point inside some imagined closed surface in free space. For that point to be one
of stable equilibrium for a positive point charge, for example, the electric field must point
everywhere toward it, which would imply a negative flux of electric field through the surface.
This would violate Gauss’s law, because ∇ · E = 0 in free space.
A more formal proof of Earnshaw’s theorem starts from the force F = qE = −q∇φ
on a point charge q, or, equivalently, the potential energy U (r) = qφ(r); ∇ · E = 0 in
free space implies Laplace’s equation,
which means that the potential energy has no local maximum or minimum inside
the surface of Figure 1.1; a local maximum or minimum would require that all three
second derivatives in Laplace’s equation have the same sign, which would contradict
the equation. It is only possible at any point to have a maximum along one direction
and a minimum along another (saddle points). In particular, no combination of forces
involving 1/r potential energies, such as, for example, electrostatic plus gravitational
interactions, can result in points of stable equilibrium, since the sum of the Laplacians
over all the potentials is zero.
The Reverend Samuel Earnshaw presented his theorem in 1842 in the context of the
“luminiferous ether” and elasticity theory. He showed that forces varying as the inverse square
of the distance between particles could not produce a stable equilibrium, and concluded that
the ether must be held together by non-inverse-square forces. Maxwell stated the theorem
as “a charged body placed in a field of electric force cannot be in stable equilibrium,” and
proved it for electrostatics.3
Earnshaw’s theorem in electrostatics only says that stable equilibrium cannot occur with
electrostatic forces alone. If other forces act to hold negative charges in place, a positive
charge can, of course, be kept in stable equilibrium by a suitable distribution of the negative
charges. Similarly, a charge can be in stable equilibrium in electric fields that vary in time, or
in a dielectric medium (held together by non-electrostatic forces!) in which any displacement
of the charge results in a restoring force acting back on it, as occurs for a charge at the center
of a dielectric sphere with permittivity ǫ < ǫ0 .4
Things are a little more complicated in magnetostatics. There are no magnetic monopoles,
and the potential energy of interest is U (r) = −m · B for a magnetic dipole m in a magnetic
field B. For induced magnetic dipoles, m = αm B, where αm > 0 for a paramagnetic material
3 J. C. Maxwell, Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, Volume 1, Dover Publications, New York,
1954, p. 174.
4 See, for instance, D. F. V. James, P. W. Milonni, and H. Fearn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3194 (1995).
6 Elements of Classical Electrodynamics
(the dipole tends to align with the B field), αm < 0 for a diamagnetic material (the dipole
tends to “anti-align” with the field), the potential energy is
Z B(r)
1
U (r) = − αm B · dB = − αm B 2 (r), (1.2.4)
0 2
and ∇2 U = −(1/2)αm ∇2 B 2 . For there to be a point of stable equilibrium the flux of the force
F through any surface surrounding the point in free space must be negative, which, from the
divergence theorem, requires that ∇ · F = −∇2 U < 0, or αm ∇2 B 2 < 0 at that point. Now in
free space ∇ × B = 0, and, consequently, ∇ × (∇ × B) = ∇(∇ · B) − ∇2 B = 0, so ∇2 B = 0
and
∇2 (B · B) = 2B · ∇2 B + 2|∇B|2 = 2|∇B|2 ≥ 0. (1.2.5)
Therefore, we cannot have αm ∇2 B 2 < 0 in the paramagnetic case, that is, a paramagnetic
particle cannot be held in stable equilibrium in a magnetostatic field. But it is possible for a
diamagnetic particle to be in stable equilibrium in a magnetostatic field: this is simply because
B 2 , unlike any of the three components of B itself, does not satisfy Laplace’s equation and can
have a local minimum. Ordinary diamagnetic materials (wood, water, proteins, etc.) are only
very weakly diamagnetic, but levitation is possible in sufficiently strong magnetic fields. The
most spectacular practical application at present of magnetic levitation—“maglev” trains—is
based on the levitation of superconductors (αm → −∞) in magnetic fields.
1 ∂φ 2 1 ∂2A
∇(∇ · A + ) − ∇ A + = µ0 J. (1.3.1)
c2 ∂t c2 ∂t2
In terms of φ and A, (1.1.1) becomes
∂
∇2 φ + (∇ · A) = −ρ/ǫ0 . (1.3.2)
∂t
These last two equations for the potentials φ and A are equivalent to the Maxwell
equations (1.1.3) and (1.1.1), and the definitions of φ and A ensure that the remaining
two Maxwell equations are satisfied. But φ and A are not uniquely specified by B =
∇ × A and E = −∇φ − ∂A/∂t: we can satisfy Maxwell’s equations with different
potentials A′ and φ′ obtained from the gauge transformations A = A′ + ∇χ, and φ =
φ′ − ∂χ/∂t with B = ∇ × A = ∇ × A′ , and E = −∇φ − ∂A/∂t = −∇φ′ − ∂A′ /∂t.5
5 The word “gauge” in this context was introduced by Hermann Weyl in 1929.
Gauges and the Relativity of Fields 7
1 ∂φ
∇·A+ = 0. (1.3.3)
c2 ∂t
Then, from (1.3.1) and (1.3.2),
1 ∂2A
∇2 A − = −µ0 J, (1.3.4)
c2 ∂t2
2
1 ∂ φ
∇2 φ − 2 2 = −ρ/ǫ0 . (1.3.5)
c ∂t
The advantage of the Lorentz gauge, as the name suggests, comes when the equations
of electrodynamics are formulated so as to be “manifestly” invariant under the Lorentz
transformations of relativity theory, as discussed below.
Recall a solution of the scalar wave equation
1 ∂2ψ
∇2 ψ − = f (r, t) (1.3.6)
c2 ∂t2
using the Green function G satisfying
1 ∂2
(∇2 − )G(r, t; r′ , t′ ) = δ 3 (r − r′ )δ(t − t′ ). (1.3.7)
c2 ∂t2
From a standard representation for the delta function,
4 Z ∞
1
Z
3 ′ ′ 3
δ (r − r )δ(t − t ) = d k dωei(k·R−ωT ) , (1.3.8)
2π −∞
6 Recall that the “Lorentz gauge” is really a class of gauges, as we can replace A by A + ∇ψ, and
φ by φ − ∂ψ/∂t, and still satisfy (1.3.3) as long as ∇2 ψ − (1/c2 ) ∂ 2 ψ/∂t2 = 0. The Coulomb gauge
condition, similarly, remains satisfied under such “restricted” gauge transformations with ∇2 ψ = 0,
but for potentials that fall off at least as fast as 1/r, r being the distance from the center of a localized
charge distribution, ψ = 0. What is generally called the Lorentz gauge condition was actually proposed
a quarter-century before H. A. Lorentz by L. V. Lorenz, who also formulated equations equivalent to
Maxwell’s, independently of Maxwell but a few years later. See J. D. Jackson and L. B. Okun, Rev.
Mod. Phys. 73, 663 (2001).
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
The Daughter of the Dawn.
CHAPTER I.
A SPLENDID MADMAN.
For some minutes the aged chief sat silent, looking out far away
over the sea, where the white-winged taniwhas7 of the Pakeha pass
through Raukawa, to gain the great ocean of Kiwa. His thoughts
were as far away as the blue Isle of Rangitoto, marked vaguely in
the horizon. What thing was he pursuing over the dim trail of the
past? Of a truth he seemed to see those who were not present, to
hear those who did not speak. Would he begin his story at the time
when those fierce old history-makers of yore—the Waitahi and the
Ngaitahu—dwelt in the valley of the “Pensive Water,” and held their
land against the fierce invaders coming down from the land of Tara?
No, he turned towards us, and the words from his breast were of
things long, long before the Waitahi fought their frays upon the
sounding shore.
He spoke in a hushed voice; for our ears alone were the secret
things he was about to unfold.
“O men of the great land beyond the mountains and the sea, why
should I tell to you those things which none but our priesthood of
ancient night have known? It is because I have heard the voices of
the Great Tohungas of the Earth speaking to me in sleep, and I have
had no rest. Therefore I will obey the words that have come to me in
the whistling winds of heaven, and reveal a secret of the ancient
tohungas of my race. Yet in doing this I know full well that, by the
occult law of the ages, I shall incur my death.
“Know then, O children of another world, that the blood of the
Great River of Heaven has run through the veins of an unbroken
hereditary priesthood from the further shore of Time to this day that
we see beneath the shining sun. Men who do not know speak of Te
Kahui Tipua; a band of man-eating demons, they say, who dwelt
here in Aopawa. Sons! these are no demons, but the powerful
priesthood of which I speak to you, extending back into the far night
of the world. The Rangitane and the Ngaitahu have nursed our
priests in their wahine’s laps; the Ngatimamoe also, and before them
the Waitahi, skilled in spells—all these came and passed away like
the leaves of the kohutukutu,8 but the father blood of the ancient
Kahui Tipua is of the Great River of Heaven flowing down the ages
from times when this land of the Maori was without a shore from the
rising to the setting sun.
“What the west wind has whispered in the branches of the
Kahikatea, what his friend has spoken with his tongue about the
woman, and my own word to you about a lost child, are the head, the
back, and the tail of one story. Hearken to me then, O men from over
the sea, while I show to you a hidden thing which has never been
shown to a pakeha before, nor revealed to any but our own
priesthood. Then, when Te Makawawa has trodden the Highway of
Tane, and you see his eye set as a star in the sky, you will tell this
sacred thing to your brethren of the other side, for it is a word of
power to the Maori and Pakeha alike. But know that whoever reveals
this hidden thing to the outside world must die.
“Not three days’ journey towards the setting sun is a high plain
rolling like a yellow sea beneath a great mountain wall. On that
sacred plain waves now the golden toi-toi, and it is desolate; but
there was a time when a great city stood there in which dwelt a
mighty race of long ago. And within that mountain wall is the vast
temple of Ruatapu, cut out of the ancient rock by the giant tohungas
of old. This, O children of the sun that rose to-day, was long before
the wharekura9 of our lesser tohungas, many ages before the Maori
set sail from Hawaiki to find these shores. In that temple of the ages
are strange things preserved from the wreck of the ancient world—
things which one day you shall see, but I now shorten my words to
tell of a sacred stone under the protection of the Good Tohungas of
the Brow of Ruatapu, and yet again of another, an accursed stone,
the plaything of the Vile Tohungas of the Pit.
“In that far time, when this land of the Maori was but a small part of
a vast land now eaten by the sea, the people who dwelt in the city of
the high plain were powerful giants, and they were ruled by a
priesthood of tohungas, among whom two kinds of magic were
practised: the Good and the Vile. The Good Tohungas derived their
spells, like Tawhaki, from the heavens above, where the Great